Stigma Experienced by Rural Pregnant Women with Substance Use Disorder: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Synthesis

Perceptions of overdose response hotlines and applications among rural and remote individuals who use drugs in Canada: a qualitative study

INTRODUCTION

The overdose epidemic continues to be one of the largest public health crises in Canada. Various harm reduction supports have been implemented to curb this epidemic; however, they remain concentrated within urban settings. To address this limitation, overdose response hotlines and applications (ORHA) are novel, technologybased harm reduction services that may reduce drug-related mortality for people who use substances (PWUS) living in rural communities through virtual supervised consumption. These services enable more timely and remote activation of emergency responses, should an individual become unresponsive. We aimed to explore the experiences, perceptions and attitudes surrounding ORHA of individuals living in rural areas.

METHODS

We conducted semistructured interviews with 15 PWUS (7 [46.7%] male, 9 [60%] Indigenous) who lived in rural, remote or Indigenous communities. Interviews were conducted until data saturation was reached. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Six key themes emerged: (1) participants viewed ORHA as a pragmatic intervention for rural areas but noted potential limitations to its uptake and effectiveness; (2) rural geography may hinder EMS response times, reducing the efficacy of ORHA; (3) ORHA uptake may be limited due to significant stigma faced by PWUS in these communities; (4) lack of access to technology remains a barrier to ORHA access; (5) harm reduction awareness is often limited in rural communities; and (6) there are unique social implications around substance use and harm reduction for rural Indigenous PWUS.

CONCLUSION

While participants believed that ORHA may be a feasible harm reduction strategy for rural PWUS, limitations, including response times, technological access and substance use stigma, remain.

Population perinatal substance use and an environmental scan of health services in British Columbia, Canada

BACKGROUND

Substance use during pregnancy is underreported globally and there is limited data on its prevalence and the availability of supportive services. This study determined population perinatal substance use in British Columbia (BC) by region and examined the availability of clinical and community-based programs.

METHODS

Using linked provincial health administrative data, we conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study including all BC residents accessing care for substance use (alcohol, opioids, stimulants, sedatives, and cannabis) within 12 months of first perinatal care record to delivery during 2016-2021. We also conducted an environmental scan to identify all programs offering perinatal care and substance use treatment/support in BC as of December 2022 and described program components by region.

RESULTS

The population included 12,439 people with perinatal substance use with 13,814 linked livebirths during the study period. The incidence rate of perinatal substance use was nearly eight times higher in rural/remote Northern BC compared to the metropolitan Vancouver Coastal region (1044.2 vs. 131.3 per 100,000 population, respectively). We identified 29 related services (19 wrap-around programs, 8 supportive housing, and only 2 acute care programs). Residents outside of Metro Vancouver accounted for 60 % (N=1745) of people with perinatal substance use; however, these regions represented only 35 % of BC's specialized acute care and supportive housing beds (N=140).

CONCLUSIONS

Expanding supports for perinatal substance use - particularly acute care and supportive housing within more rural/remote regions in BC - will be critical to address geographic inequities in access to perinatal care and improve health outcomes for pregnant people who use substances and their infants.

Substance use during pregnancy: the role of mindfulness in reducing stigma

Stigmatization is a significant healthcare barrier among individuals who utilize substances during pregnancy. Of the 3.6 million U.S. births each year, approximately 10% are affected by perinatal substance use, an estimate which is likely underestimated due to fear of stigma and prosecution. Of those experiencing perinatal substance use, less than 11% receive treatment, while maternal deaths due to overdose during the postpartum period have increased by 81% from 2017 to 2020. Societal perception of non-pregnant individuals experiencing substance use disorders recognizes the biological basis of addiction, whereas for pregnant individuals, societal perception slides into moral failing as the basis of addiction. Many recommendations and guidelines for decreasing substance use stigmatization among non-pregnant and pregnant individuals exist. We focus on the use of mindfulness in recognizing and addressing structural and social stigma within healthcare systems. Mindfulness has been extracted from its roots as an essential element of the Eightfold Path in Buddhism, which largely centers on living ethically to reduce suffering of self and others. By acknowledging the roots of mindfulness, providers can engage mindfully in practices that help identify one's overarching personal values and encourage one to lead healthcare encounters compassion and willingness to support help-seeking community members who are experiencing suffering. A deeper awareness of mindfulness practices within the context of ethical conduct can support healthcare shifts away from criminalization toward more patient- and family-centered approaches.

Perinatal women in substance use disorder treatment: Interest in partnering with family and friends to support recovery needs

BACKGROUND

Perinatal women treated for substance use disorder (SUD) face considerable barriers to recovery that might be ameliorated through activation of community support.

OBJECTIVES

This descriptive study evaluated the presence of drug-free family and friends in the social networks of perinatal women treated for SUD. It also assessed the interest of these women to partner with network members to mobilize support across several recovery needs.

METHODS

Social network interviews were conducted with 40 pre- and post-partum women treated at the Center for Addiction and Pregnancy (CAP) in Baltimore, Maryland. These interviews also prompted participants to consider which network members to invite to the program to support recovery efforts.

RESULTS

Study participants reported that their personal social networks included 4.4 drug-free adults. An overwhelming majority (80%) of participants reported a willingness to invite at least one person to the CAP program. Participants also endorsed several opportunities for collaboration between the program and community support.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that treatment program guided activation of network support offers a testable strategy to help perinatal women reduce barriers to recovery and improve treatment outcomes.

A case study on variations in network structure and cross-sector alignment in two local systems serving pregnant and parenting women in recovery

OBJECTIVE

To describe network structure and alignment across organizations in healthcare, public health, and social services sectors that serve pregnant and parenting women with substance use disorder (SUD) in an urban and a rural community.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTINGS

Two community networks, one urban and one rural with each including a residential substance use treatment program, in Kentucky during 2021.

STUDY DESIGN

Social network analysis measured system collaboration and cross-sector alignment between healthcare, public health, and social services organizations, applying the Framework for Aligning Sectors. To understand the alignment and structure of each network, we measured network density overall and between sectors, network centralization, and each organization's degree centrality and effective size.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

Computer-assisted telephone interviews were conducted to document alignment around shared purpose, data, financing, and governance.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

On average, overall and cross-sector network densities in both communities were similar. However, alignment was highest for data sharing and financing in the urban community and for shared purpose and governance in the rural community. Cross-sector partnerships involving healthcare organizations were more prevalent in the rural county (44% vs. 38% for healthcare/public health, 44% vs. 29% for healthcare/social services), but more prevalent for those involving public health/social services organizations in the urban county (42% vs. 24%). A single healthcare organization had the highest degree centrality (Mdn [IQR] = 26 [26-9.5]) and effective size (Mdn [IQR] = 15.9 [20.6-8.7]) within the rural county. Social services organizations held more central positions in the urban county (degree centrality Mdn [IQR] = 13 [14.8-9.5]; effective size Mdn [IQR] = 10.4 [11.4-7.9]).

CONCLUSIONS

Cross-sector alignment may strengthen local capacity for comprehensive SUD care for pregnant and parenting women. Healthcare organizations are key players in cross-sector partnerships in the rural community, where one healthcare facility holds the central brokerage role. In contrast, public health agencies are key to cross-sector collaboration with social services in the urban community.

Spirituality in Australian Health Professional Practice: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Synthesis of Findings

This study explores how spirituality is integrated into practice across the different Australian health professions. Utilising the Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) protocol, six databases were searched, and sixty-seven articles were finally included. To present the findings, a qualitative synthesis was used. 'Meaning' and 'purpose in life' were found to be key to many spirituality definitions. The most frequently reported approach for Australian health professionals (HPs) in asking about client spirituality was using one or two questions within a comprehensive assessment. Major facilitators included a holistic care approach and prior training, whereas a key barrier was a lack of time.

Sex- and Gender-Specific Drug Abuse Dynamics: The Need for Tailored Therapeutic Approaches

Sex and gender have been gaining ever greater attention due to their associated risks, dynamics, patterns and protective factors underlying substance abuse and addiction. Such differentiations and the clarification of complexities thereof take on even greater relevance in light of drug abuse scope worldwide. According to the 2022 World Drug Report released by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), in 2020 an estimated 284 million people worldwide aged 15-64 had used a drug within the last 12 months. The authors have set out to shed a light on determinants and contributing factors of drug abuse based on sex and gender and outline policy and medicolegal remarks aimed at delineating sex- and gender-based approaches towards drug abuse therapeutic interventions that are both therapeutically and ethically/legally viable and grounded in an evidence-based set of standards. Neurobiological data suggest that estrogen may facilitate drug taking by interacting with reward- and stress-related systems. In animal research, the administration of estrogen increases drug taking and facilitates the acquisition, escalation, and reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior. From a medicolegal perspective, it is of utmost importance to take into account the whole picture constituting each patient profile, which certainly includes gender factors and contributors, when outlining a therapeutic approach. Failure to do so could lead to negligence-based malpractice allegations, in light of the scientific findings representing best practices with which clinicians need to comply when caring for SUD patients.

Leveraging Digital Technology to Support Pregnant and Early Parenting Women in Recovery from Addictive Substances: A Scoping Review

Little is known about digital health interventions used to support treatment for pregnant and early parenting women (PEPW) with substance use disorders (SUD).

METHODS

Guided by the Arksey and O'Malley's Scoping Review Framework, empirical studies were identified within the CINAHL, PsycInfo, PubMed, and ProQuest databases using subject headings and free-text keywords. Studies were selected based on a priori inclusion/exclusion criteria, and data extraction and descriptive analysis were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 27 original studies and 30 articles were included. Varying study designs were used, including several feasibility and acceptability studies. However, efficacious findings on abstinence and other clinically important outcomes were reported in several studies. Most studies focused on digital interventions for pregnant women (89.7%), suggesting a dearth of research on how digital technologies may support early parenting women with SUD. No studies included PEPW family members or involved PEPW women in the intervention design.

CONCLUSIONS

The science of digital interventions to support treatment for PEPW is in an early stage, but feasibility and efficacy results are promising. Future research should explore community-based participatory partnerships with PEPW to develop or tailor digital interventions and include family or external support systems to engage in the intervention alongside PEPW.