Surgical resection of brain metastases-impact on neurological outcome

Trehalose enhanced cold atmospheric plasma-mediated cancer treatment

Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) is a unique form of physical plasma that has shown great potential for cancer therapy. CAP uses ionized gas to induce lethal oxidative stress on cancer cells; however, the efficacy of CAP therapy continues to be improved. Here, we report an injectable hydrogel-mediated approach to enhance the anti-tumor efficacy of CAP by regulating the phosphorylation of eIF2α. We discovered that reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS/RNS), two main anti-tumor components in CAP, can lead to lethal oxidative stress on tumor cells. Elevated oxidative stress subsequently induces eIF2α phosphorylation, a pathognomonic marker of immunogenic cell death (ICD). Trehalose, a natural disaccharide sugar, can further enhance CAP-induced ICD by elevating the phosphorylation of eIF2α. Moreover, injectable hydrogel-mediated delivery of CAP/trehalose treatment promoted dendritic cell (DC) maturation, initiating tumor-specific T-cell mediated anti-tumor immune responses. The combination therapy also supported the polarization of tumor-associated macrophages to an M1-like phenotype, reversing the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and promoting tumor antigen presentation to T cells. In combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (i.e., anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, aPD1), CAP/trehalose therapy further inhibited tumor growth. Importantly, our findings also indicated that this hydrogel-mediated local combination therapy engaged the host systemic innate and adaptive immune systems to impair the growth of distant tumors.

Multicentric Assessment of Safety and Efficacy of Combinatorial Adjuvant Brain Metastasis Treatment by Intraoperative Radiation Therapy and Immunotherapy

PURPOSE

After surgical resection of brain metastases (BMs), intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) provides a promising alternative to adjuvant external beam radiation therapy by enabling superior organ-at-risk preservation, reduction of in-hospital times, and timely admission to subsequent systemic treatments, which increasingly comprise novel targeted immunotherapeutic approaches. We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of IORT in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and other targeted therapies (TTs).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In a multicentric approach incorporating individual patient data from 6 international IORT centers, all patients with BMs undergoing IORT were retrospectively assessed for combinatorial treatment with ICIs/TTs and evaluated for toxicity and cumulative rates, including wound dehiscence, radiation necrosis, leptomeningeal spread, local control, distant brain progression (DBP), and estimated overall survival.

RESULTS

In total, 103 lesions with a median diameter of 34 mm receiving IORT combined with immunomodulatory systemic treatment or other TTs were included. The median follow-up was 13.2 (range, 1.2-102.4) months, and the median IORT dose was 25 (range, 18-30) Gy prescribed to the applicator surface. There was 1 grade 3 adverse event related to IORT recorded (2.2%). A 4.9% cumulative radiation necrosis rate was observed. The 1-year local control rate was 98.0%, and the 1-year DBP-free survival rate was 60.0%. Median time to DBP was 5.5 (range, 1.0-18.5) months in the subgroup of patients experiencing DBP, and the cumulative leptomeningeal spread rate was 4.9%. The median estimated overall survival was 26 (range, 1.2 to not reached) months with a 1-year survival rate of 74.0%. Early initiation of immunotherapy/TTs was associated with a nonsignificant trend toward improved DBP rate and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of ICIs/TTs with IORT for resected BMs does not seem to increase toxicity and yields encouraging local control outcomes in the difficult-to-treat subgroup of larger BMs. Time gaps between surgery and systemic treatment could be shortened or avoided. The definitive role of IORT in local control after BM resection will be defined in a prospective trial.

Symptomatic brain metastases in melanoma

Although clinical outcomes in metastatic melanoma have improved in recent years, the morbidity and mortality of symptomatic brain metastases remain challenging. Response rates and survival outcomes of patients with symptomatic melanoma brain metastases (MBM) are significantly inferior to patients with asymptomatic disease. This review focusses upon the specific challenges associated with the management of symptomatic MBM, discussing current treatment paradigms, obstacles to improving clinical outcomes and directions for future research.

Phase unwrapping for MHz optical coherence elastography and application to brain tumor tissue

During neuro-oncologic surgery, phase-sensitive optical coherence elastography (OCE) can be valuable for distinguishing between healthy and diseased tissue. However, the phase unwrapping process required to retrieve the original phase signal is a challenging and critical task. To address this issue, we demonstrate a one-dimensional unwrapping algorithm that recovers the phase signal from a 3.2 MHz OCE system. With a processing time of approximately 0.11 s per frame on the GPU, multiple 2π wraps are detected and corrected. By utilizing this approach, exact and reproducible information on tissue deformation can be obtained with pixel accuracy over the entire acquisition time. Measurements of brain tumor-mimicking phantoms and human ex vivo brain tumor samples verified the algorithm's reliability. The tissue samples were subjected to a 200 ms short air pulse. A correlation with histological findings confirmed the algorithm's dependability.

[Brain metastases]

Cerebral metastases in patients with metastatic lung cancer are found in more than 30% of patients at baseline and manifest themselves in two out of three patients during disease evolution. For a long time, the cerebral manifestation of the disease was classified as prognostically unfavorable and hence such patients were regularly excluded from therapy studies. In the context of targeted molecular therapy strategies and established immuno-oncological systemic therapies, the blood-brain barrier no longer represents an insurmountable barrier. However, the treatment of brain metastases requires decision making in a multidisciplinary team within dedicated lung cancer and/or oncology centers. The differentiated treatment decision is based on the number, size and location of the brain metastases, neurology and general condition, comorbidities, potential life expectancy and the patient's wishes, but also tumor biology including molecular targets, extra-cranial tumor burden and availability of a CNS-effective therapy. Systemic therapies as well as neurosurgical and radiotherapeutic concepts are now often combined for optimized and prognosis-improving therapeutic strategies.

Enhancing outcomes: neurosurgical resection in brain metastasis patients with poor Karnofsky performance score - a comprehensive survival analysis

Background

A reduced Karnofsky performance score (KPS) often leads to the discontinuation of surgical and adjuvant therapy, owing to a lack of evidence of survival and quality of life benefits. This study aimed to examine the clinical and treatment outcomes of patients with KPS < 70 after neurosurgical resection and identify prognostic factors associated with better survival.

Methods

Patients with a preoperative KPS < 70 who underwent surgical resection for newly diagnosed brain metastases (BM) between 2007 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The KPS, age, sex, tumor localization, cumulative tumor volume, number of lesions, extent of resection, prognostic assessment scores, adjuvant radiotherapy and systemic therapy, and presence of disease progression were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with better survival. Survival > 3 months was considered favorable and ≤ 3 months as poor.

Results

A total of 140 patients were identified. Median overall survival was 5.6 months (range 0-58). There was no difference in the preoperative KPS between the groups of > 3 and ≤ 3 months (50; range, 20-60 vs. 50; range, 10-60, p = 0.077). There was a significant improvement in KPS after surgery in patients with a preoperative KPS of 20% (20 vs 40 ± 20, p = 0.048). In the other groups, no significant changes in KPS were observed. Adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with better survival (44 [84.6%] vs. 32 [36.4%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.0363; confidence interval [CI], 0.197-0.670, p = 0.00199). Adjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy resulted in prolonged survival (24 [46.2%] vs. 12 [13.6%]; HR 0.474, CI 0.263-0.854, p = 0.013]. Systemic disease progression was associated with poor survival (36 [50%] vs. 71 [80.7%]; HR 5.975, CI 2.610-13.677, p < 0.001].

Conclusion

Neurosurgical resection is an appropriate treatment modality for patients with low KPS. Surgery may improve functional status and facilitate further tumor-specific treatment. Combined treatment with adjuvant radiotherapy and systemic therapy was associated with improved survival in this cohort of patients. Systemic tumor progression has been identified as an independent factor for a poor prognosis. There is almost no information regarding surgical and adjuvant treatment in patients with low KPS. Our paper provides novel data on clinical outcome and survival analysis of patients with BM who underwent surgical treatment.

Functional MRI applications for intra-axial brain tumours: uses and nuances in surgical practise

PURPOSE

Functional MRI (fMRI) has well-established uses to inform risks and plan maximally safe approaches in neurosurgery. In the field of brain tumour surgery, however, fMRI is currently in a state of clinical equipoise due to debate around both its sensitivity and specificity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this review, we summarise the role and our experience of fMRI in neurosurgery for gliomas and metastases. We discuss nuances in the conduct and interpretation of fMRI that, based on our practise, most directly impact fMRI's usefulness in the neurosurgical setting.

RESULTS

Illustrated examples in which fMRI in our hands directly influences the neurosurgical treatment of brain tumours include evaluating the probability and nature of functional risks, especially for language functions. These presurgical risk assessments, in turn, help to predict the resectability of tumours, select or deselect patients for awake surgery, indicate the need for neurophysiological monitoring and guide the optimal use of intra-operative stimulation mapping. A further emerging application of fMRI is in measuring functional adaptation of functional networks after (partial) surgery, of potential use in the timing of further surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In appropriately selected patients with a clearly defined surgical question, fMRI offers a valuable complementary tool in the pre-surgical evaluation of brain tumours. However, there is a great need for standards in the administration and analysis of fMRI as much as in the techniques that it is commonly evaluated against. Surprisingly little data exists that evaluates the accuracy of fMRI not just against complementary methods, but in terms of its ultimate clinical aim of minimising post-surgical morbidity.

Outcome assessment of intraoperative radiotherapy for brain metastases: results of a prospective observational study with comparative matched-pair analysis

PURPOSE

Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is an emerging alternative to adjuvant stereotactic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) following resection of brain metastases (BM). Advantages of IORT include an instant prevention of tumor regrowth, optimized dose-sparing of adjacent healthy brain tissue and immediate completion of BM treatment, allowing an earlier admission to subsequent systemic treatments. However, prospective outcome data are limited. We sought to assess long-term outcome of IORT in comparison to EBRT.

METHODS

A total of 35 consecutive patients, prospectively recruited within a study registry, who received IORT following BM resection at a single neuro-oncological center were evaluated for radiation necrosis (RN) incidence rates, local control rates (LCR), distant brain progression (DBP) and overall survival (OS) as long-term outcome parameters. The 1 year-estimated OS and survival rates were compared in a balanced comparative matched-pair analysis to those of our institutional database, encompassing 388 consecutive patients who underwent adjuvant EBRT after BM resection.

RESULTS

The median IORT dose was 30 Gy prescribed to the applicator surface. A 2.9% RN rate was observed. The estimated 1 year-LCR was 97.1% and the 1 year-DBP-free survival 73.5%. Median time to DBP was 6.4 (range 1.7-24) months in the subgroup of patients experiencing intracerebral progression. The median OS was 17.5 (0.5-not reached) months with a 1 year-survival rate of 61.3%, which did not not significantly differ from the comparative cohort (p = 0.55 and p = 0.82, respectively).

CONCLUSION

IORT is a safe and effective fast-track approach following BM resection, with comparable long-term outcomes as adjuvant EBRT.

Opportunities and Alternatives of Modern Radiation Oncology and Surgery for the Management of Resectable Brain Metastases

Postsurgical radiotherapy (RT) has been early proven to prevent local tumor recurrence, initially performed with whole brain RT (WBRT). Subsequent to disadvantageous cognitive sequalae for the patient and the broad distribution of modern linear accelerators, focal irradiation of the tumor has omitted WBRT in most cases. In many studies, the effectiveness of local RT of the resection cavity, either as single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or hypo-fractionated stereotactic RT (hFSRT), has been demonstrated to be effective and safe. However, whereas prospective high-level incidence is still lacking on which dose and fractionation scheme is the best choice for the patient, further ablative techniques have come into play. Neoadjuvant SRS (N-SRS) prior to resection combines straightforward target delineation with an accelerated post-surgical phase, allowing an earlier start of systemic treatment or rehabilitation as indicated. In addition, low-energy intraoperative RT (IORT) on the surgical bed has been introduced as another alternative to external beam RT, offering sterilization of the cavity surface with steep dose gradients towards the healthy brain. This consensus paper summarizes current local treatment strategies for resectable brain metastases regarding available data and patient-centered decision-making.

Mind the gap-the use of sodium fluoresceine for resection of brain metastases to improve the resection rate

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

Brain metastases appear to be well resectable due to dissectable tumor margins, but postoperative MRI quite often depicts residual tumor with potential influence on tumor control and overall survival. Therefore, we introduced sodium fluoresceine into the routine workflow for brain metastasis resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the use of fluorescence-guided surgery has an impact on postoperative tumor volume and local recurrence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively included patients who underwent surgical resection for intracranial metastases of systemic cancer between 11/2017 and 05/2021 at our institution. Tumor volumes were assessed pre- and postoperatively on T1-CE MRI. Clinical and epidemiological data as well as follow-up were gathered from our prospective database.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients (33 male, 46 female) were included in this study. Median preoperative tumor volume amounted to 11.7cm3 and fluoresceine was used in 53 patients (67%). Surgeons reported an estimated gross total resection (GTR) in 95% of the cases, while early postoperative MRI could confirm GTR in 72%. Patients resected using fluoresceine demonstrated significantly lower postoperative residual tumor volumes with a difference of 0.7cm3 (p = 0.044) and lower risk of local tumor recurrence (p = 0.033). The use of fluorescence did not influence the overall survival (OS). Postoperative radiotherapy resulted in a significantly longer OS (p = 0.001).

DISCUSSION

While GTR rates may be overrated, the use of intraoperative fluorescence may help neurosurgeons to achieve a more radical resection. Fluoresceine seems to facilitate surgical resection and increase the extent of resection thus reducing the risk for local recurrence.

Surgery for brain metastases: radiooncology scores predict survival-score index for radiosurgery, graded prognostic assessment, recursive partitioning analysis

BACKGROUND

Radiooncological scores are used to stratify patients for radiation therapy. We assessed their ability to predict overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing surgery for metastatic brain disease.

METHODS

We performed a post-hoc single-center analysis of 175 patients, prospectively enrolled in the MetastaSys study data. Score index of radiosurgery (SIR), graded prognostic assessment (GPA), and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) were assessed. All scores consider age, systemic disease, and performance status prior to surgery. Furthermore, GPA and SIR include the number of intracranial lesions while SIR additionally requires metastatic lesion volume. Predictive values for case fatality at 1 year after surgery were compared among scoring systems.

RESULTS

All scores produced accurate reflections on OS after surgery (p ≤ 0.003). Median survival was 21-24 weeks in patients scored in the unfavorable cohorts, respectively. In cohorts with favorable scores, median survival ranged from 42 to 60 weeks. Favorable SIR was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.44 [0.29, 0.66] for death within 1 year. For GPA, the HR amounted to 0.44 [0.25, 0.75], while RPA had a HR of 0.30 [0.14, 0.63]. Overall test performance was highest for the SIR.

CONCLUSIONS

All scores proved useful in predicting OS. Considering our data, we recommend using the SIR for preoperative prognostic evaluation and counseling.

Endoscope-assisted visualization of 5-aminolevulinic acid fluorescence in surgery for brain metastases

OBJECTIVE

Fluorescence-guided resection of cerebral metastases has been proposed as an approach to visualize residual tumor tissue and maximize the extent of resection. Critics have argued that tumor cells at the resection margins might be overlooked under microscopic visualization because of technical limitations. Therefore, an endoscope, which is capable of inducing fluorescence, has been applied with the aim of improving exposure of fluorescent tumor tissue. In this retrospective analysis, authors assessed the utility of endoscope assistance in 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) fluorescence-guided resection of brain metastases.

METHODS

Between June 2013 and December 2016, a standard 20-mg/kg dose of 5-ALA was administered 4 hours prior to surgery in 26 patients with suspected single brain metastases. After standard neuronavigated microsurgical tumor resection, a microscope capable of inducing fluorescence was used to examine tumor margins. The authors classified the remaining fluorescence into 3 grades (0 = none, 1 = weak, and 2 = strong). Endoscopic assistance was employed if no or only weak fluorescence was visualized at the resection margins under the microscope. Endoscopically identified fluorescent tissue at the margins was resected and evaluated separately via histological examination to prove or disprove tumor infiltration.

RESULTS

Under the microscope, weakly fluorescent tissue was seen at the margins of the resection cavity in 15/26 (57.7%) patients. In contrast, endoscopic inspection revealed strongly fluorescent tissue in 22/26 (84.6%) metastases. In 11/26 (42.3%) metastases no fluorescence at the tumor margins was detected by the microscope; however, strong fluorescence was visualized under the endoscope in 7 (63.6%) of these 11 metastases. In the 15 metastases with microscopically weak fluorescence, strong fluorescence was seen when using the endoscope. Neither microscopic nor endoscopic fluorescence was found in 4/26 (15.4%) cases. In the 26 patients, 96 histological specimens were obtained from the margins of the resection cavity. Findings from these specimens were in conjunction with the histopathological findings, allowing identification of metastatic infiltration with a sensitivity of 95.5% and a specificity of 75% using endoscope assistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluorescence-guided endoscope assistance may overcome the technical limitations of the conventional microscopic exposure of 5-ALA-fluorescent metastases and thereby increase visualization of fluorescent tumor tissue at the margins of the resection cavity with high sensitivity and acceptable specificity.

Wide Dissection Trans-Sulcal Approach for Resection of Deep Intra-Axial Lesions in Eloquent Brain Areas

Introduction: Resection of intra-axial tumors (IaT) in eloquent brain regions risks major postoperative neurological deficits. Awake craniotomy is often used to navigate these areas; however, some patients are ineligible for awake procedures. The trans-sulcal approach (TScal) was introduced to reduce parenchymal trauma during tumor resection. We report our experiences utilizing TScal for resection of deep IaT located in eloquent areas. Materials and Methods: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of patients who underwent IaT resection in eloquent areas via TScal from January 2013 to April 2021. Seventeen cases were reviewed, and relevant data was collected. Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and intraoperative ultrasound was performed in some cases. Results: Seventeen patients (10 males, 7 females) averaging 61.2 years-old (range, 21-76) were included in this study. Average length of stay was 4.8 days, and only 2 patients (11.8%) required hospital readmission within 30 days. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 15 patients (88.2%), while subtotal resection occurred in 2 patients (11.8%). Eleven patients (64.7%) reported full resolution of symptoms, 4 patients (23.5%) reported deficit improvement, and 2 patients (11.8%) experienced no change from their preoperative deficits. No patient developed new permanent deficits postoperatively. Discussion: GTR, preoperative deficit reduction, and complications were comparable to awake craniotomy and other TScal studies. Ancillary intraoperative techniques, such as brain mapping, 5-ALA and intraoperative ultrasound, are afforded by TScal to improve resection rates and overall outcomes. Conclusions: TScal can be an option for patients with deep lesions in eloquent areas who are not candidates for awake surgeries.

Delirium-related factors and their prognostic value in patients undergoing craniotomy for brain metastasis

Background

Delirium is characterized by acute brain dysfunction. Although delirium significantly affects the quality of life of patients with brain metastases, little is known about delirium in patients who undergo craniotomy for brain metastases. This study aimed to identify the factors influencing the occurrence of delirium following craniotomy for brain metastases and determine its impact on patient prognosis.

Method

A total of 153 patients who underwent craniotomy for brain metastases between March 2013 and December 2020 were evaluated for clinical and radiological factors related to the occurrence of delirium. Statistical analysis was conducted by dividing the patients into two groups based on the presence of delirium, and statistical significance was confirmed by adjusting the clinical characteristics of the patients with brain metastases using propensity score matching (PSM). The effect of delirium on patient survival was subsequently evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis.

Results

Of 153 patients, 14 (9.2%) had delirium. Age (P = 0.002), sex (P = 0.007), and presence of postoperative hematoma (P = 0.001) were significantly different between the delirium and non-delirium groups. When the matched patients (14 patients in each group) were compared using PSM, postoperative hematoma showed a statistically significant difference (P = 0.036) between the delirium and non-delirium groups. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed that the delirium group had poorer prognosis (log-rank score of 0.0032) than the non-delirium group.

Conclusion

In addition to the previously identified factors, postoperative hematoma was identified as a strong predictor of postoperative delirium. Also, the negative impact of delirium on patient prognosis including low survival rate was confirmed.

Prognostic factors following resection of intracranial metastases

Background:

The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors associated with resection of intracranial metastases.

Methods:

A retrospective case series including patients who underwent resection of cranial metastases from March 2014 to April 2021 at a single center. This identified 112 patients who underwent 124 resections. The median age was 65 years old (24–84) and the most frequent primary cancers were nonsmall cell lung cancer (56%), breast adenocarcinoma (13%), melanoma (6%), and colorectal adenocarcinoma (6%). Postoperative MRI with contrast was performed within 48 hours in 56% of patients and radiation treatment was administered in 41%. GraphPad Prism 9.2.0 was used for the survival analysis.

Results:

At the time of data collection, 23% were still alive with a median follow-up of 1070 days (68–2484). The 30- and 90-day, and 1- and 5-year overall survival rates were 93%, 83%, 35%, and 17%, respectively. The most common causes of death within 90 days were as follows: unknown (32%), systemic or intracranial disease progression (26%), and pneumonia (21%). Age and extent of neurosurgical resection were associated with overall survival (P < 0.05). Patients aged >70 had a median survival of 5.4 months compared with 9.7, 11.4, and 11.4 for patients <50, 50–59, and 60–69, respectively. Gross-total resection achieved an overall survival of 11.8 months whereas sub-total, debulking, and unclear extent of resection led to a median survival of 5.7, 7.0, and 9.0 months, respectively.

Conclusion:

Age and extent of resection are potential predictors of long-term survival.

Real-world data on melanoma brain metastases and survival outcome

Novel medical therapies have revolutionized outcome for patients with melanoma. However, patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) still have poor survival. Data are limited as these patients are generally excluded from clinical trials, wherefore real-world data on clinical outcome may support evidence-based treatment choices for patients with MBM. Patients diagnosed with MBM between 2008 and 2020 were included retrospectively. Patient characteristics, treatment, and outcome data were recorded from The Danish Metastatic Melanoma Database, pathology registries, electronic patient files, and radiation plans. Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibodies and the combination of BRAF/MEK-inhibitors were introduced in Denmark in 2015, and the cohort was split accordingly for comparison. A total of 527 patients were identified; 148 underwent surgical excision of MBM, 167 had stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), 270 received whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), and 343 received systemic therapies. Median overall survival (mOS) for patients diagnosed with MBM before and after 2015 was 4.4 and 7.6 months, respectively. Patients receiving surgical excision as first choice of treatment had the best mOS of 10.9 months, whereas patients receiving WBRT had the worst outcome (mOS, 3.4 months). Postoperative SRS did not improve survival or local control after surgical excision of brain metastases. Of the 40 patients alive >3 years after diagnosis of MBM, 80% received immunotherapy at some point after diagnosis. Patients with meningeal carcinosis did not benefit from treatment with CPI. Outcome for patients with MBM has significantly improved after 2015, but long-term survivors are rare. Most patients alive >3 years after diagnosis of MBM received immunotherapy.

Intracranial Metastatic Disease: Present Challenges, Future Opportunities

Intracranial metastatic disease (IMD) is a prevalent complication of cancer that significantly limits patient survival and quality of life. Over the past half-century, our understanding of the epidemiology and pathogenesis of IMD has improved and enabled the development of surveillance and treatment algorithms based on prognostic factors and tumor biomolecular characteristics. In addition to advances in surgical resection and radiation therapy, the treatment of IMD has evolved to include monoclonal antibodies and small molecule antagonists of tumor-promoting proteins or endogenous immune checkpoint inhibitors. Moreover, improvements in the sensitivity and specificity of imaging as well as the development of new serological assays to detect brain metastases promise to revolutionize IMD diagnosis. In this review, we will explore current treatment principles in patients with IMD, including the emerging role of targeted and immunotherapy in select primary cancers, and discuss potential areas for further investigation.

Improved Protoporphyrin IX-Guided Neurosurgical Tumor Detection with Frequency-Domain Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging

Precise intraoperative brain tumor visualization supports surgeons in achieving maximal safe resection. In this sense, improved prognosis in patients with high-grade gliomas undergoing protoporphyrin IX fluorescence-guided surgery has been demonstrated. Phase fluorescence lifetime imaging in the frequency-domain has shown promise to distinguish weak protoporphyrin IX fluorescence from competing endogenous tissue fluorophores, thus allowing for brain tumor detection with high sensitivity. In this work, we show that this technique can be further improved by minimizing the crosstalk of autofluorescence signal contributions when only detecting the fluorescence emission above 615 nm. Combining fluorescence lifetime and spectroscopic measurements on a set of 130 ex vivo brain tumor specimens (14 low- and 56 high-grade gliomas, 39 meningiomas and 21 metastases) coherently substantiated the resulting increase of the fluorescence lifetime with respect to the detection band employed in previous work. This is of major interest for obtaining a clear-cut distinction from the autofluorescence background of the physiological brain. In particular, the median fluorescence lifetime of low- and high-grade glioma specimens lacking visual fluorescence during surgical resection was increased from 4.7 ns to 5.4 ns and 2.9 ns to 3.3 ns, respectively. While more data are needed to create statistical evidence, the coherence of what was observed throughout all tumor groups emphasized that this optimization should be taken into account for future studies.

Surgery for brain metastases-impact of the extent of resection

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection of brain metastases improves symptoms and survival in selected patients. The benefit of gross total resection is disputed, as most patients are believed to succumb from their non-CNS tumor burden. We investigated the association between overall survival and residual tumor after surgery for single brain metastases.

METHODS

We reviewed adults who underwent surgery for a single brain metastasis at a regional referral center (2011-2018). Gross total resection was defined as no visible residual tumor on cerebral MRI 12-48 h postoperatively.

RESULTS

We included 373 patients. The most common primary tumors were lung cancer (36%) and melanoma (24%). We identified gross total resection in 238 patients (64%). Median overall survival was 11.0 months, 8.0 (6.2-9.8) months for patients with subtotal resection and 13.0 (9.7-16.3) months for patients with gross total resection. In a multivariate regression analysis including preoperative prognostic factors, gross total resection was associated with longer overall survival (HR: 0.66, p = 0.003). Postoperative radiotherapy administered within 6 weeks did not significantly alter the hazard ratio estimates for grade of resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests improved survival with gross total resection compared to subtotal resection. The importance of extent of resection in surgery for brain metastases should not be discarded.

Robotic-Assisted Digital Exoscope for Resection of Cerebral Metastases: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection is the primary treatment for cerebral metastases with safe complete resection as the goal. The robotically assisted digital surgical exoscope is a novel system with advanced visualization methods with recent applications in neurosurgery.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes for patients with cerebral metastases undergoing resection with the surgical exoscope.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected from patients with cerebral metastases where resection was achieved with using the surgical exoscope from 2016 to 2020. Demographics, clinical, imaging, and operative and outcome findings were collected. The relationship between perioperative data and discharge disposition as well as progression-free survival (PFS) and 12 mo overall survival (OS) was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients (19 males) with a median patient age 63 yr (range 38-80) were included. Average pre- and postoperative volumes were 18.1 cc and 0.75 cc, respectively. Mean depth of the resected lesions was 0.6 cm (range 0-3.6 cm). Complete resection was achieved in 64.5% of patients. The mean extent of resection was 96.7%, with 71.0% achieving PFS at 6 mo. Overall PFS rate was 58.1% and the OS rate at 12 mo was 83.9%. Neurological complications included motor (35.5%) and sensory (12.9%) deficits, with 12 patients reporting no postoperative symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The surgical exoscope can delineate tumor tissues with high resolution, as shown by a gross total resection achieved for the majority of cases in our series. Postoperative complications and patient outcomes were similar to those reported with use of the operative microscope. Use of the exoscope can provide optimal visualization and delineation of cerebral metastases.

The evolving role of neurosurgery for central nervous system metastases in the era of personalized cancer therapy

Recent therapeutic advances involving the use of systemic targeted treatments and immunotherapeutic agents in patients with advanced cancers have translated into improved survival rates. Despite the emergence of such promising pharmacological therapies and extended survival, the frequency of metastases in the central nervous system has steadily increased. Effective medical and surgical therapies are available for many patients with brain metastases and need to be incorporated into multi-disciplinary care protocols. The role of neurosurgeons is evolving within these multi-disciplinary care teams. Surgical resection of brain metastases can provide immediate relief from neurological symptoms due to large lesions and provides the histopathological diagnosis in cases of no known primary malignancy. In situations where immunotherapy is part of the oncological treatment plan, surgery may be proposed for expeditious relief of edema to remove the need for steroids. In patients with multiple brain metastases and mixed response to therapeutics or radiosurgery, tumour resampling allows tissue analysis for druggable targets or to distinguish radiation effects from progression. Ventriculo-peritoneal shunting may improve quality of life in patients with hydrocephalus associated with leptomeningeal tumour dissemination and may allow for time to administer more therapy thus prolonging overall survival. Addressing the limited efficacy of many oncological drugs for brain metastases due to insufficient blood-brain barrier penetrance, clinical trial protocols in which surgical specimens are analysed after pre-surgical administration of therapeutics offer pharmacodynamic insights. Comprehensive neurosurgical assessment remains an integral element of multi-disciplinary oncological care of patients with brain metastases and is integral to tumour biology research and therapeutic advancement.

Peri-radiosurgical administration of bevacizumab improves radiographic response to single and fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for large brain metastasis

INTRODUCTION

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a standard of care for brain metastases (BM) patients, yet large BM are at a greater risk for radionecrosis and local progression (LP). Concomitant bevacizumab and radiotherapy has been shown to improve outcomes in primary and metastatic brain tumors. This retrospective study investigated the efficacy and safety of concurrent bevacizumab and SRS for large BM.

METHODS

From 2015 to 2019, patients with a BM diameter ≥ 2 cm who received either combination therapy (n = 49, SRS + BVZ group), or SRS alone (n = 73, SRS group) were enrolled. Bevacizumab was given peri-radiosurgically with a 2-week interval. Radiographic response was assessed using the RECIST version 1.1. Competing risk and logistic regression analysis were performed to evaluate prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Radiographic response was achieved in 41 patients (84%) in the SRS + BVZ group and 37 patients (51%) in the SRS group (p = 0.001). In the multivariate regression analysis, concurrent bevacizumab was independently associated with a better radiographic response (p = 0.003). The cumulative incidences of LP and ≥ grade 2 radionecrosis at 12 months between the SRS + BVZ group and SRS group were 2% versus 6.8%, and 14.3% versus 14.6%, respectively. For patients with BM size ≥ 3 cm, the cumulative incidence of LP was significantly lower in the SRS + BVZ group (p = 0.03). No ≥ grade 4 toxicity was observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent bevacizumab and SRS for large BM is highly effective, with a better radiographic response and minimal excessive treatment-related toxicities. Peri-radiosurgical bevacizumab preferentially reduced the risk of LP, especially for BM size ≥ 3 cm.

Applying machine learning to optical coherence tomography images for automated tissue classification in brain metastases

Purpose

A precise resection of the entire tumor tissue during surgery for brain metastases is essential to reduce local recurrence. Conventional intraoperative imaging techniques all have limitations in detecting tumor remnants. Therefore, there is a need for innovative new imaging methods such as optical coherence tomography (OCT). The purpose of this study is to discriminate brain metastases from healthy brain tissue in an ex vivo setting by applying texture analysis and machine learning algorithms for tissue classification to OCT images.

Methods

Tumor and healthy tissue samples were collected during resection of brain metastases. Samples were imaged using OCT. Texture features were extracted from B-scans. Then, a machine learning algorithm using principal component analysis (PCA) and support vector machines (SVM) was applied to the OCT scans for classification. As a gold standard, an experienced pathologist examined the tissue samples histologically and determined the percentage of vital tumor, necrosis and healthy tissue of each sample. A total of 14.336 B-scans from 14 tissue samples were included in the classification analysis.

Results

We were able to discriminate vital tumor from healthy brain tissue with an accuracy of 95.75%. By comparing necrotic tissue and healthy tissue, a classification accuracy of 99.10% was obtained. A generalized classification between brain metastases (vital tumor and necrosis) and healthy tissue was achieved with an accuracy of 96.83%.

Conclusions

An automated classification of brain metastases and healthy brain tissue is feasible using OCT imaging, extracted texture features and machine learning with PCA and SVM. The established approach can prospectively provide the surgeon with additional information about the tissue, thus optimizing the extent of tumor resection and minimizing the risk of local recurrences.

Surgical and Peri-Operative Considerations for Brain Metastases

Introduction

Brain metastases are the most common brain tumors in adults, whose management remains nuanced. Improved understanding of risk factors for surgical complications and mortality may guide treatment decisions.

Methods

A nationwide, multicenter analysis was conducted with a retrospective cohort. Adult patients in the 2012-2015 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS NSQIP) databases who received a craniotomy for resection of brain metastasis were included.

Results

3500 cases were analyzed, of which 17% were considered frail and 24% were infratentorial. The most common 30-day medical complications were venous thromboembolism (3%, median time-to-event [TTE] 4.5 days), pneumonia (4%, median TTE 6 days), and urinary tract infections (2%, median TTE 5 days). Reoperation and unplanned readmission occurred in 5% and 12% of patients, respectively. Infratentorial approach and frailty were associated with reoperation before discharge (OR 2.0 for both; p=0.01 and p=0.03 respectively), but not after discharge. Infratentorial approaches conferred heightened risk for readmission for hydrocephalus (OR 5.1, p=0.02) and reoperation for cerebrospinal fluid diversion (OR 7.1, p<0.001).Overall 30-day mortality was 4%, with nearly three-quarters occurring after discharge. Pre-frailty and frailty were associated with increased odds for post-discharge mortality (OR 1.7 and 2.7, p<0.05), but not pre-discharge mortality. We developed a model to identify pre-/peri-operative variables associated with death, including frailty, thrombocytopenia, and high American Society of Anesthesiologists score (AUROC 0.75).

Conclusions

Optimization of metrics contributing to patient frailty and heightened surveillance in patients with infratentorial metastases may be considered in the peri-operative period.

The Management of Brain Metastases-Systematic Review of Neurosurgical Aspects

Simple Summary

In this comprehensive review, we focused on the neurosurgical treatment as an integrative part of the challenging multidisciplinary management of cerebral metastases, a neuro-oncologic entity, which has been observed to have an increased incidence over the last years. In selected cases, the surgical removal of the space-occupying mass reduces the intracranial pressure, normalizes the metabolic environment, reduces the symptom burden, and allows for the intensification of local and systemic adjuvant treatment. In detail, we discuss the incidence of brain metastases, the role of surgical resection, as well as the evolution of current neurosurgical techniques, the surgical morbidity and mortality of single and multiple lesions, and we enlighten the role of surgery for recurrent tumors.

Abstract

The multidisciplinary management of patients with brain metastases (BM) consists of surgical resection, different radiation treatment modalities, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and targeted molecular treatment. This review presents the current state of neurosurgical technology applied to achieve maximal resection with minimal morbidity as a treatment paradigm in patients with BM. In addition, we discuss the contribution of neurosurgical resection on functional outcome, advanced systemic treatment strategies, and enhanced understanding of the tumor biology.

[Brain metastases-Interdisciplinary approach towards a personalized treatment]

The incidence, treatment and prognosis of patients with brain metastases have substantially changed during the last decades. While the survival time after diagnosis of cerebral metastases was on average a maximum of 3-6 months only 10 years ago, the survival time could be significantly improved due to novel surgical, radiotherapeutic and systemic treatment modalities. Only a few years ago, the occurrence of brain metastases led to a withdrawal from systemic oncological treatment and the exclusion of drug therapy studies and to a purely palliatively oriented treatment in the sense of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) with or without surgery. The increasing availability of targeted and immunomodulatory drugs as well as adapted radio-oncological procedures enable increasingly more personalized treatment approaches. The aim of this review article is to demonstrate the progress and complexity of the treatment of brain metastases in the context of modern comprehensive interdisciplinary concepts.

Brain Metastases in Elderly Patients-The Role of Surgery in the Context of Systemic Treatment

In patients with brain metastases (BM), advanced age is considered a negative prognostic factor. To address the potential reasons for that, we assessed 807 patients who had undergone BM resection; 315 patients aged at least 65 years (group A) were compared with 492 younger patients (group B). We analyzed the impact of the pre- and postoperative Karnofsky performance status (KPS), postoperative treatment structure and post-treatment survival. BM resection significantly improved KPS scores in both groups (p = 0.0001). Median survival after BM resection differed significantly between the groups (A: 5.81 vs. B: 8.12 months; p = 0.0015). In both groups, patients who received postoperative systemic treatment showed significantly longer overall survival (p = 0.00001). However, elderly patients less frequently received systemic treatment (p = 0.0001) and the subgroup of elderly patients receiving such therapies had a significantly higher postsurgical KPS score (p = 0.0007). In all patients receiving systemic treatment, age was no longer a negative prognostic factor. Resection of BM improves the functional status of elderly patients, thus enhancing the likeliness to receive systemic treatment, which, in turn, leads to longer overall survival. In the context of such a treatment structure, age alone is no longer a prognostic factor for survival.

Management of melanoma brain metastases: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines by Cancer Council Australia

INTRODUCTION

The brain is a common site of metastatic disease for patients with advanced melanoma. Brain metastasis portends a poor prognosis, often causing deterioration in neurological function and quality of life, and leading to neurological death. Treatment approaches including surgery, radiotherapy and systemic therapy can lead to better control of this problem. Therefore, appropriate guidelines for the management of melanoma brain metastases need to be established, with regular updating when new treatment options become available.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary working party established by Cancer Council Australia has produced up-to-date, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of melanoma. After selecting key clinical questions, a comprehensive literature search for relevant studies was conducted, followed by systematic review of those studies. Data were summarised and the evidence was assessed, leading to the development of recommendations.

MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS

Symptomatic lesions are best treated with surgery, when possible; this provides safe and effective local control. For patients with single or a small number of asymptomatic brain metastases, stereotactic radiotherapy is recommended, but in asymptomatic patients who have not previously received systemic treatment, drug therapy can be considered as a first-line treatment option. Whole brain radiotherapy may provide palliative benefits in patients with multiple brain metastases. Whenever possible, melanoma patients with brain metastases should be managed by a multidisciplinary team of melanoma specialists that considers the optimal combination and sequencing of surgery, radiotherapy and systemic therapy.

Neurological symptom burden impacts survival prognosis in patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BM) are a frequent complication of advanced cancer and are characterized by a variety of neurological symptoms. Although the presence of neurological symptoms is included in the response assessment in patients with primary brain tumors, to the authors' knowledge little is known regarding the prognostic impact of neurological symptoms in patients with BM.

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed BM from non-small cell lung cancer were identified from the Vienna Brain Metastasis Registry and were evaluated according to the incidence, distribution, and prognostic impact of neurological symptoms at the time of diagnosis of BM.

RESULTS

A total of 1608 patients (57.3% male and 42.7% female; median age, 62 years) were available for further analyses. Neurological symptoms including focal deficits (985 patients; 61.3%), signs of increased intracranial pressure (483 patients; 30.0%), epileptic seizures (224 patients; 13.9%), and neuropsychological symptoms (233 patients; 14.5%) were documented in 1186 of the 1608 patients (73.8%). Patients with asymptomatic BM presented with a longer median overall survival after the diagnosis of BM compared with patients with symptomatic BM (11 months vs 7 months; P < .001). In multivariate analysis with a diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (hazard ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.33-1.50 [P < .001]), the presence of neurological symptoms (hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.23-1.57 [P < .001]) was found to be independently associated with survival prognosis from the time of diagnosis of BM.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurological symptoms at the time of BM diagnosis demonstrated a strong and independent association with survival prognosis. The results of the current study have highlighted the need for the integration of the presence of neurological symptoms into the prognostic assessment of patients with BM from non-small cell lung cancer.

LAY SUMMARY

Neurological symptom evaluation is included regularly in the assessment of patients with primary brain tumors. However, to the authors' knowledge, little is known regarding the prognostic impact in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases (BM). The current study has provided a detailed clinical characterization of the incidence, distribution, and prognostic impact of neurological symptoms in a large, real-life cohort of patients with BM from non-small cell lung cancer. In this cohort, neurological symptoms at the time of diagnosis of BM demonstrated a strong, independent prognostic impact on the survival prognosis. The results of the current study have highlighted the need for the integration of neurological symptom burden into the prognostic assessment of patients with BM from non-small cell lung cancer.

Surgical resection of symptomatic brain metastases improves the clinical status and facilitates further treatment

Background

Brain metastases (BM) frequently cause focal neurological deficits leading to a reduced Karnofsky performance score (KPS). Since KPS is routinely used to guide the choice of adjuvant therapy, we hypothesized that improving KPS by surgical resection may improve the chance for adjuvant treatment and ultimately result in better survival. We therefore analyzed the course of a large cohort undergoing resection of symptomatic brain metastases in the context of further treatment and clinical outcome.

Patients and methods

In a bi‐centric retrospective analysis we retrieved baseline, clinical, and treatment‐related parameters of patients operated on BM between 2010 and 2019. Survival was calculated using Kaplan‐Meier estimates; prognostic factors for survival were analyzed by Log‐rank test and Cox proportional hazards.

Results

We included 750 patients with a median age of 61 (19‐87) years. The functional status was significantly improved by surgical resection, with a median preoperative (KPS) of 80 (10‐100) increasing to 90 (0‐100) after surgery (P < .0001). Moreover, surgery improved the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class from III to I/II in 82 patients. Postoperative local radiotherapy and systemic treatment were associated with significantly longer survival (P < .0001 for each). Systemic treatment was provided significantly more frequently in patients with a fair postoperative clinical status (KPS ≥ 70; P < .0001). The postoperative clinical status, postoperative radiotherapy, systemic treatment, controlled systemic disease and < 4 BM were independent predictors for survival.

Conclusion

The resection of symptomatic BM may restore clinical status, so enhancing the likelihood of receiving adjuvant treatment, and therefore leading to improved overall survival.

The primary sites leading to brain metastases: Shifting trends at a tertiary care center

While the majority of brain metastases arise from lung cancer, breast cancer, or melanoma, new treatments and improved prognoses have altered the profile of primary cancers that metastasize to the brain. We sought to determine the proportion of brain metastases from less common primary sites and conduct trend analyses. We reviewed the charts of 3585 patients with brain metastases seen at our institution from 2008 to 2018. We determined the primary site for each of these patients, and the Mann-Kendall test was used to evaluate temporal trends in the yearly proportion of brain metastases originating from each primary cancer. The five most common primary sites were lung (43.0%), breast (19.9%), melanoma (8.2%), renal (5.0%), and colorectal (3.8%). The proportion of yearly brain metastases originating from breast cancer (p = 0.029) and melanoma (p = 0.013) decreased by 23.8% and 46.7%, respectively, from 2008 (0.21 breast, 0.15 melanoma) to 2018 (0.16 breast, 0.08 melanoma), while no change was found in the proportion of brain metastases from lung, renal, and colorectal cancers. Brain metastases arising from rare primary sites, defined as those comprising at most 2% of all brain metastases, increased by 34.4% (p = 0.005). Limited sample size prohibited trend analysis of other individual primary sites. We report a decrease over 11 years in the proportion of brain metastases originating from breast cancer and melanoma at our institution, and an increase in brain metastases from rare primary sites. Further work with larger, multi-center databases will enable additional evaluation of brain metastases from rare primary sites.

Brain metastases from esophageal cancer: A retrospective analysis of the outcome after surgical resection followed by radiotherapy

Brain metastases deriving from esophageal cancer are very rare with scarce data available concerning these patients' outcome. We, therefore, evaluated outcome after surgical resection followed by radiotherapy of brain metastasis from esophageal cancer.A retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive patients undergoing resection of brain metastasis from esophageal cancer in 2 neuro-oncological centers between 2008 and 2018. Clinical and demographic data were retrieved from electronic patient charts. Post-treatment survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates.Twenty-five patients were identified. Treatment for primary disease comprised neo-adjuvant radio-chemotherapy followed by surgery (64.0%), surgery and adjuvant radio-chemotherapy (8.0%), radio-chemotherapy only (24.0%), and 1 patient receiving esophageal stenting only. Median time interval since initial diagnosis was 16 (range 0-110) months. All but 1 brain lesion were neurologically symptomatic and median Karnofsky performance score improved postoperatively from 70 to 80. After resection of brain metastases patients received whole-brain (n = 13 (52.0%)) or local fractionated (n = 9 (36.0%)) radiotherapy. In 2 patients adjuvant treatment was impeded by clinical deterioration; 1 patient refused radiotherapy. By the time of analysis 22 patients had died. Median survival after brain metastasis was 6 (95% CI 0.5-11.6) months.Survival after resection of metastasis from esophageal cancer is poor compared to other tumor entities. Nevertheless, resection of symptomatic brain metastases may improve clinical status in the context of a palliative concept.

Clinical characteristics, treatment and prognosis of paediatric patients with metastatic neuroblastoma to the brain

OBJECTIVE

Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most common extracranial solid malignancy in children. Metastatic involvement of brain is rare in NB. This study was established to evaluate the clinical characteristics, treatment and prognosis of NB patients with brain metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From September 2005 to December 2016, the clinical data of 15 cases with brain metastases among 264 NB patients admitted to Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University were collected and retrospectively analysed. The clinical features of the 15 patients were summarised, and the patients were grouped according to different treatment methods and followed up for a median time of 41 months. The survival curves were plotted, and the Log-rank test was performed to compare the effect of different treatment methods on the prognosis.

RESULTS

The proportion of brain metastases in NB patients in our hospital is 5.68% (15/264). For the prognosis of 15 NB cases, the survival time of combined radiotherapy and/or autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation group was longer than that of simple operation and chemotherapy group (61.79 ± 9.59 vs. 30.00 ± 5.99 months, P = 0.03). Among the 15 patients, 4 cases underwent intracranial tumor resection, 4 cases received craniospinal irradiation, and the rest received maintenance chemotherapy. The 2-year survival rate was 82.2%, and the 5-year survival rate was 19.9%. The survival time of combined intracranial surgery and/or radiotherapy group was significantly longer than that of the chemotherapy group (46.67 ± 6.69 vs. 16.42 ± 1.42 months, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of brain metastases NB in children is relatively small, but the prognosis is very poor. Active chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery-based comprehensive treatment can prolong the survival time.

Brain metastases and treatment: multiplying cognitive toxicities

INTRODUCTION

Thirty per cent of cancer patients develop brain metastases, with multiple combination or sequential treatment modalities available, to treat systemic or central nervous system (CNS) disease. Most patients experience toxicities as a result of these treatments, of which cognitive impairment is one of the adverse events most commonly reported, causing major impairment of the patient's quality of life. Areas covered: This article reviews the role of cancer treatments in cognitive decline of patients with brain metastases: surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapies, immunotherapies and hormone therapy. Pathological and molecular mechanisms, as well as future directions for limiting cognitive toxicities are also presented. Other causes of cognitive impairment in this population are discussed in order to refine the benefit-risk balance of each treatment modality. Expert opinion: Cumulative cognitive toxicity should be taken into account, and tailored to the patient's cognitive risk in the light of the expected survival benefit. Standardization of cognitive assessment in this context is needed in order to better appreciate each treatment's responsibility in cognitive impairment, keeping in mind disease itself impacts cognition in this context.

Surgery for brain metastases: An analysis of outcomes and factors affecting survival

OBJECTIVES

For patients who develop brain metastases from solid tumors, age, KPS, primary tumor status and presence of extracranial metastases have been identified as prognostic factors. However, the factors that affect survival in patients who are deemed fit to undergo resection of brain metastases have not been clearly elucidated hitherto.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database. All patients who underwent resection of intracranial metastases from solid tumors were included. Various patient, disease and treatment related factors were analyzed to assess their impact on survival.

RESULTS

Overall, 124 patients had undergone surgery for brain metastases from various primary sites. The median age and pre-operative performance score were 53 years and 80 respectively. Synchronous metastases were resected in 17.7% of the patients. The postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 17.7% and 2.4% respectively. Adjuvant whole brain radiation was received by 64 patients. At last follow-up, 8.1% of patients had fresh post-surgical neurologic deficits. The median progression free and overall survival were 6.91 was 8.56 months respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection of for brain metastases should be considered in carefully selected patients. Gross total resection and receiving adjuvant whole brain RT significantly improves survival in these patients.

The role of surgery for brain metastases from solid tumors

Surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy including novel targeted therapy strategies and any combination thereof as well as supportive care are the key elements for treatment of brain metastases. Goals of microsurgery are to obtain tissue samples for histologic diagnosis (particularly in case of uncertainty about the unknown primary tumor but also in the context of future targeted therapies), to relieve burden from space-occupying effects, to improve local tumor control, and to prolong overall survival. Complete surgical resection improves local tumor control and may even affect overall survival. Stereotactic radiosurgery is an equal effective alternative for metastases up to 3 cm in diameter, especially in highly eloquent or deep seated location. Gross total resection (as defined by immediate postoperative MRI) does not necessarily have to be combined with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), at least for patients with good performance status and controlled systemic disease. Particularly in cases of incomplete resections, focal irradiation or radiosurgery of the resection cavity or tumor remnant rather than WBRT may be attempted.

Retrospective study of 229 surgically treated patients with brain metastases: Prognostic factors, outcome and comparison of recursive partitioning analysis and diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment

Background:

Metastases are the most frequent tumors in the brain. Most often used scoring systems to predict the outcome are the RPA (Recursive Partitioning Analysis) classification and the DS-GPA (Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment) score. The goal of our study was to determine prognostic factors which influence outcome in patients who undergo surgery for brain metastases and to compare different outcome scores.

Methods:

Two hundred and twenty-nine patients who underwent surgery for brain metastases in our institution between January 2005 and December 2014 were included in the study. Patient data were evaluated retrospectively.

Results:

The mean survival time was 19.2 months (median survival time, MST: 8 months), for patients with a single metastasis (n = 149) 17.6 months (MST: 8 months), and for patients with multiple metastases (n = 80) 17.9 months (MST: 6 months). Significant influence on MST had age <65 years (9 vs. 5 months, P = 0.002), female sex (10 vs. 6 months, P < 0.001), RPA Class I and II (11 vs. 4 months, P < 0.001), Karnofsky score >70% (11 vs. 4 months, P < 0.001), and postoperative radiotherapy (8 vs. 5 months, P < 0.002). To evaluate the diagnostic power of DS-GPA and RPA score in respect of survival, two Cox regressions were modeled, where the RPA classification showed a better predictive power.

Conclusion:

Favorable factors for prolonged survival were KPS >70%, RPA Class I and II, age <65 years, female sex, a DS-GPA Score of 2.5–3 and 3.5–4, and adjuvant radiotherapy. The RPA Classification was more accurate in predicting the outcome than the DS-GPA score.

Fluorescein sodium-guided resection of cerebral metastases-an update

BACKGROUND

Cerebral metastasis (CM) is the most common malignancy affecting the brain. In patients eligible for surgery, complete tumor removal is the most important predictor of overall survival and neurological outcome. The emergence of surgical microscopes fitted with a fluorescein-specific filter have facilitated fluorescein-guided microsurgery and identification of tumor tissue. In 2012, we started evaluating fluorescein (FL) with the dedicated microscope filter in cerebral metastases (CM). After describing the treatment results of our first 30 patients, we now retrospectively report on 95 patients.

METHODS

Ninety-five patients with CM of different primary cancers were included (47 women, 48 men, mean age, 60 years, range, 25-85 years); 5 mg/kg bodyweight of FL was intravenously injected at induction of anesthesia. A YELLOW 560-nm filter (Pentero 900, ZEISS Meditec, Germany) was used for microsurgical tumor resection and resection control. The extent of resection (EOR) was assessed by means of early postoperative contrast-enhanced MRI and the grade of fluorescent staining as described in the surgical reports. Furthermore, we evaluated information on neurological outcome and surgical complications as well as any adverse events.

RESULTS

Ninety patients (95%) showed bright fluorescent staining that markedly enhanced tumor visibility. Five patients (5%); three with adenocarcinoma of the lung, one with melanoma of the skin, and one with renal cell carcinoma) showed insufficient FL staining. Thirteen patients (14%) showed residual tumor tissue on the postoperative MRI. Additionally, the MRI of three patients did not confirm complete resection beyond doubt. Thus, gross-total resection had been achieved in 83% (n = 79) of patients. No adverse events were registered during the postoperative course.

CONCLUSIONS

FL and the YELLOW 560-nm filter are safe and feasible tools for increasing the EOR in patients with CM. Further prospective evaluation of the FL-guided technique in CM-surgery is in planning.

Brain Metastases: Surgical Treatment and Overall Survival

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases occur in 10%-40% of patients with cancer and are more common than primary brain tumors (30%-40%); their incidence is growing because of improvements in control of systemic disease, better radiologic detection, and prolonged survival. Modern treatment of brain metastases has dramatically changed the expected prognosis. Traditionally, the prognosis has been considered very poor, and patients were referred to palliative treatment because of their terminal stage; however, new prognostic indexes have been proposed to evaluate these patients. The aim of our study was to determine the long-term effect of surgery on overall survival (OS) in patients with brain metastases from dissimilar primary tumors and to identify prognostic variables associated with prolonged survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of patients who underwent surgery between January 2010 and October 2014 for cerebral metastases from lung, kidney, breast, and gastrointestinal cancers and melanoma. Variables included age; sex; histology; location of lesions; and specific treatments patients had undergone including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery, individually or combined.

RESULTS

No patients deteriorated after surgery. At discharge, 19 patients (26.76%) had an unchanged postoperative neurologic examination, whereas 52 patients (73.23%) showed improvement (χ² = 34.84, P < 0.0001). Expected OS, considering all tumor subtypes, was 372.24 months; the patients in our series had an OS of 787 months, more than twice the expected OS; specifically, average expected survival of each patient was 5.24 months, whereas actual survival was 11.08 months (P = 0.000008).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery is a safe and effective procedure for cerebral metastases and should not be considered an aggressive treatment in such disease. In our series, 55% of patients had a survival >6 months and a significant improvement in terms of actual versus expected survival. Surgical resection should be considered the primary option for patients with brain metastases.

Fluorescein sodium-guided resection of cerebral metastases—experience with the first 30 patients

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection is a key element of the multidisciplinary treatment of cerebral metastases (CMs). Recent studies have highlighted the importance of complete resection of CMs for improving recurrence-free and overall survival rates. This study presents the first data on the use of fluorescein sodium (FL) under the dedicated surgical microscope filter YELLOW 560 nm (Zeiss Meditec, Germany) in patients with CM.

METHODS

Thirty patients with CMs of different primary cancers were included (15 females, 15 males; mean age 61.1 years); 200 mg of FL was intravenously injected directly before CM resection. A YELLOW 560 nm filter was used for microsurgical tumor resection and resection control. Surgical reports were evaluated regarding the degree of fluorescent staining, postoperative MRIs regarding the extent of resection [gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced T1-weighted sequence] and the postoperative courses regarding any adverse effects.

RESULTS

Most patients (90.0%, n = 27) showed bright fluorescent staining, which markedly enhanced tumor visibility. Three patients (10.0%) (two with adenocarcinoma of the lung and one with melanoma of the skin) showed no or only insufficient FL staining. Another three patients (10.0%) showed residual tumor tissue in the postoperative MRI examination. In two other patients, radiographic examination could not exclude the possibility of very small areas of residual tumor tissue. Thus, gross-total resection was achieved in 83.3% (n = 25) of patients. No adverse effects were registered over the postoperative course.

CONCLUSIONS

FL and the YELLOW 560 nm filter are safe and practical tools for the resection of CM, but further prospective research is needed to confirm that this advanced technique will improve the quality of CM resection.

Risks of postoperative paresis in motor eloquently and non-eloquently located brain metastases

Background

When treating cerebral metastases all involved multidisciplinary oncological specialists have to cooperate closely to provide the best care for these patients. For the resection of brain metastasis several studies reported a considerable risk of new postoperative paresis. Pre- and perioperative chemotherapy (Ctx) or radiotherapy (Rtx) alter vasculature and adjacent fiber tracts on the one hand, and many patients already present with paresis prior to surgery on the other hand. As such factors were repeatedly considered risk factors for perioperative complications, we designed this study to also identify risk factors for brain metastases resection.

Methods

Between 2006 and 2011, we resected 206 brain metastases consecutively, 56 in eloquent motor areas and 150 in non-eloquent ones. We evaluated the influences of preoperative paresis, previous Rtx or Ctx as well as recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class on postoperative outcome.

Results

In general, 8.7% of all patients postoperatively developed a new permanent paresis. In contrast to preoperative Ctx, previous Rtx as a single or combined treatment strategy was a significant risk factor for postoperative motor weakness. This risk was even increased in perirolandic and rolandic lesions. Our data show significantly increased risk of new deficits for patients assigned to RPA class 3. Even in non-eloquently located brain metastases the risk of new postoperative paresis has not to be underestimated. Despite the microsurgical approach, our cohort shows a high rate of unexpected residual tumors in postoperative MRI, which supports recent data on brain metastases’ infiltrative nature but might also be the result of our strict study protocol.

Conclusions

Surgical resection is a safe treatment of brain metastases. However, preoperative Rtx and RPA score 3 have to be taken into account when surgical resection is considered.