Therapeutic Utility and Adverse Effects of Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs in Inflammatory Arthritis

Risk of disease flare in spondyloarthritis patients after tapering tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: A meta-analysis and literature review

BACKGROUND

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) have shown dramatic benefit in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). Tapering of TNFi medication may be considered in patients with sustained low disease activity because continued use of TNFis at standard doses may increase the risk of side effects including infections and impose an economic burden. However, the optimal TNFi tapering strategy for SpA patients with inactive disease has not been established. In the present study, we investigated whether tapering TNFi doses is associated with similar risk of disease flare to maintaining SpA patients on TNFis at the standard dosage.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systemically searched to retrieve randomized control trials (RCTs) and observational studies published prior to August 2023, that compared disease flare in SpA (including axial SpA [axSpA], psoriatic arthritis [PsA], and SpA with IBD) patients who received standard TNFi doses and those who received a tapered dose of TNFi. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were directly retrieved or calculated, and meta-analyses were performed. Bias was assessed using funnel plots with Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation / Egger's regression method.

RESULTS

Among 2,237 SpA patients in the 12 studies (9 RCTs and 3 observational studies) retrieved, 1,301 received the standard TNFi dose, while 936 SpA patients underwent TNFi tapering. Of these, 216 (16.6%) standard-dose TNFi and 217 (23.2%) TNF-tapering patients experienced disease flares. The pooled OR for disease flare in TNFi-tapering patients was 1.601 (95% CI 1.276 - 2.008) compared with the standard-dose patients. The funnel plot showed no publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The strategy of TNFi tapering was associated with a significantly increased risk of disease flare compared to maintaining SpA patients at the standard TNF dose. Further studies are needed to determine which patients can safely undergo tapering of TNFi and to develop safe tapering strategies.

Pharmacogenomic Analysis of Response to Topical Tumor Necrosis Factor α Antagonist Licaminlimab (OCS-02) in Dry Eye Disease

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacogenomics of response to topical ocular tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) inhibitor licaminlimab in patients with DED.

METHODS

Three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with Sjögren syndrome, 3 in the TNFα gene and 1 in the TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1) gene, were assessed for association with response to licaminlimab in participants from a randomized, vehicle-controlled, Phase 2 study in which adults with DED and severe ocular discomfort persisting despite treatment with artificial tears received licaminlimab or vehicle for 6 weeks. Response was assessed for change from baseline in Global Ocular Discomfort score at Day 29 of treatment. The pharmacogenomic analysis was a prospectively specified exploratory objective of the study. mRNA expression for TNFα, interleukin (IL) 1β, and IL8 in conjunctival epithelium cells was determined. The relationship between SNPs and response to licaminlimab was assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis.

RESULTS

SNP rs1800693 in the TNFR1 gene showed a significant effect on response to licaminlimab (P < 0.0001, initial association test); no effect was seen for any of the other SNPs tested. The CC genotype of rs1800693 was associated with much greater response to licaminlimab than the CT or TT genotypes: LS mean changes from baseline to Day 29 in Global Ocular Discomfort score were -29.5, -0.09, and -3.90, in patients with the CC, CT, and TT genotypes, respectively (P < 0.0001). No significant effect was observed in vehicle-treated patients. Improvements from baseline were seen in 3/4 licaminlimab-treated participants with the CC genotype. Conjunctival epithelium cell levels of mRNA for TNFα, IL1β, and IL8 decreased from baseline in participants with the CC genotype, but not with the CT or TT genotypes. Between-genotype differences in mRNA levels were not observed in participants receiving vehicle.

CONCLUSIONS

The CC genotype of rs1800693, relatively common in patients with DED, was strongly associated with response to licaminlimab and decreased inflammatory cytokine gene expression in ocular surface cells during treatment. This study is one of the first to our knowledge to investigate pharmacogenomics in the treatment of DED.

Adalimumab exhibits superiority over etanercept in terms of a numerically higher response rate and equivalent adverse events: A real-world finding

INTRODUCTION

Adalimumab (ADA) and etanercept (ETN) are the most commonly applied biologics for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management in China; however, the evidence regarding their superiority is controversial. In addition, in real-world clinical settings, many factors may affect the application of these agents, such as dosage and administration period. Therefore, the present real-world study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ADA and ETN treatment in RA patients via the propensity score matching method.

METHODS

In total, 105 RA patients receiving ADA (n = 66) or ETN (n = 39) were reviewed in this retrospective study. The propensity score matching method was used to eliminate discrepancies in baseline features. Clinical response, low disease activity (LDA), and remission were evaluated based on the DAS28.

RESULTS

Before propensity score matching, compared with ETN, ADA yielded higher rates of clinical response at W24 (97.0% vs. 84.6%, p = .021), LDA at W12 (78.8% vs. 51.3%, p = .003), and remission at W24 (75.8% vs. 46.2%, p = .002). After propensity score matching, compared with ETN, ADA only achieved a higher rate of clinical response at W24 (96.3% vs. 77.8%, p = .043), whereas the rates of LDA and remission were not different between ADA and ETN treatments at any time point (all p > .05). In addition, the incidence of adverse events was not significantly different between the ADA and ETN treatments (all p > .05).

CONCLUSION

ADA shows superiority over ETN in terms of a numerically greater response rate and equivalent adverse events.

What benefit-risk trade-offs are acceptable to rheumatoid arthritis patients during treatment selection? Evidence from a multicountry choice experiment

OBJECTIVE

Understanding preferences of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can facilitate tailored patient-centric care. This study elicited trade-offs that patients with RA were willing to make during treatment selection.

METHODS

Patients with RA completed an online discrete choice experiment, consisting of a series of choices between hypothetical treatments. Treatment attributes were selected based on literature review and qualitative patient interviews. Eligible patients were ≥18 years old, diagnosed with RA, receiving systemic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy, and residents of Europe or USA. Male patients were oversampled for subgroup analyses. Data were analysed using a correlated mixed logit model.

RESULTS

Of 2090 participants, 42% were female; mean age was 45.2 years (range 18-83). Estimated effects were significant for all attributes (p<0.001) but varied between patients. Average relative attribute importance scores revealed different priorities (p<0.001) between males and females. While reducing pain and negative effect on semen parameters was most important to males, females were most concerned by risk of blood clots and serious infections. No single attribute explained treatment preferences by more than 30%. Preferences were also affected by patients' age: patients aged 18-44 years placed less importance on frequency and mode of treatment administration (p<0.05) than older age groups. Patients were willing to accept higher risk of serious infections and blood clots in exchange for improvements in pain, daily activities or administration convenience. However, acceptable trade-offs varied between patients (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Treatment preferences of patients with RA were individual-specific, but driven by benefits and risks, with no single attribute dominating the decision-making.

Metabolic Effects of Anti-TNF-α Treatment in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with high cardiovascular mortality. It is not clear whether the metabolic consequences of chronic inflammation are involved. Biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are highly efficient in the treatment of inflammation in RA. In this study, we aimed to describe the metabolic effects of anti-TNF-α treatment in RA patients. The clinical status of 16 patients was assessed using disease activity score-28 (DAS28) and C-reactive protein (CRP). Plasma samples were collected before treatment with anti-TNF-α treatment as well as after three and six months of treatment. Markers of lipid and glucose metabolism, as well as renal biomarkers, were assessed using standard biochemistry. ELISA was used for the quantification of insulin, leptin, and adiponectin. Although fasting insulin decreased by 14% at the end of the study, most of the analyzed parameters did not show any statistically or clinically significant dynamics. The exception was total bilirubin and cholesterol, which increased by 53% and 14%, respectively, after six months of treatment with anti-TNF-α treatment. Anti-TNF-α treatment did not induce major metabolic changes despite the strong anti-inflammatory and clinical symptoms of RA. Further studies will show whether longer observations are required for the detection of the metabolic effects of the anti-inflammatory treatment. Additional research is needed to understand the observed effect of bilirubin as an important endogenous antioxidant.

Conquering rheumatic diseases: are parasitic worms the answer?

Despite the introduction of novel treatment strategies, management of rheumatic disorders remains associated with substantial unmet clinical need. Of interest therefore, it has recently become apparent that there is a global inverse relationship between the incidence of such conditions and parasitic helminth infection, with striking examples involving rheumatoid arthritis (RA)/systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and filarial nematode worm infection in studies in India. Such findings reflect that helminths are master manipulators of the immune system, particularly in being able to modulate proinflammatory responses. The aim of this article is thus to consider findings to date on this exciting and intriguing research area to form an opinion on whether parasitic worms may be exploited to generate novel therapies for rheumatic diseases.

Synovial macrophages of rheumatoid arthritic mice protectively responded by altered M1/M2 differentiation after antibody blocking of TNFR1 and IL-1R

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) primarily affecting the synovial tissue, has emerged as a major concern leading to the pressing need to develop effective treatment strategies. In the affected synovial tissue, resident macrophages play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of RA. TNF-α and IL-1β released from pro-inflammatory M1 synovial macrophages are the master regulators of chronic joint inflammation. In this study collagen-induced rheumatoid arthritis model was developed in mice and post isolation, macrophages were subjected to administration with neutralizing antibodies IL1R and TNFR1 either alone or in combination. Flow cytometric analysis followed by Western blots, ROS, and IL-1β, TNF-α release assays were performed. Outcomes suggested that post-dual blockade of IL1R and TNFR1 arthritic synovial macrophages showed a shifting of the M1 towards the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype. Moreover, the switch towards the M2 phenotype might be responsible for decreased levels of IL-1β,TNF-α, and ROS and simultaneous elevation in the activity of antioxidant enzymes like SOD, CAT, and GP_X content in the isolated macrophages. Simultaneous blocking of both IL1R and TNFR1 also showed a sharp reduction in the expression of NF-κB and SAPK-JNK. The elevated arginase and GR_X activity further confirmed the polarization towards M2. Moreover, bioinformatics analysis was performed,and it was found that blocking TNFR1 with an antibody could hamper the binding of TNF to TNFR1 in the TNF-TNFR1 pathway. Thus, it may be inferred that dual blockade of IL1R and TNFR1 and a suitable antibody blocking of TNFR1 might be alternative therapeutic approaches for the regulation of RA-induced inflammation in the future.