Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Kidney Transplantation as a Potential Rejection Biomarker: A Systematic Literature Review

Changes in Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Before and After Rejection and De Novo DSA Detection in Primary and Repeat Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Serial monitoring of dd-cfDNA and change from baseline can provide meaningful information beyond absolute thresholds. We describe dd-cfDNA trajectories from the baseline before and after acute rejection (AR) and de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) detection in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

METHODS

We included KTR from 02/2019 to 03/2022 with serial dd-cfDNA. The primary analysis compared the time-varying change in dd-cfDNA from baseline in KTR first AR on biopsy [AR] to patients with no-AR on biopsy [no-AR].

RESULTS

151 KTR were analyzed (AR = 56 KTR, no-AR = 95 KTRs). In the AR group, dd-cfDNA rose ahead of diagnosis: median rise from baseline was 75% at -3 months, 32% at -2 months, and 325% at -1 month before biopsy. At the time of biopsy, the median rise in dd-cfDNA from baseline was 291% (IQR [interquartile range] 88%-1081%) in AR and 17% (IQR 0%- 194%) in no-AR (p < 0.0001). Following treatment, dd-cfDNA values fell in the AR group with a median change from baseline of 94.7% at +1 month, 10.5% at +2 months, and 0% at +3 months. These trajectories were not observed in the no-AR group. Similarly, there were no significant differences in eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate) trajectories between the two groups. The median change from baseline to dnDSA detection was 141% (IQR 112%-574%). In KTRs with persistent rejection, median dd-cfDNA was 0.95% (IQR 0.44-1.8) compared to 0.19% (IQR 0.12-0.31) in subjects with no rejection on follow-up (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The significant changes from baseline observed before and after AR show how serial monitoring enhances dd-cfDNA utility and allows for earlier identification of evolving injury and monitoring treatment response.

Application of graft-derived cell-free DNA for solid organ transplantation

Monitoring the status of grafts and the occurrence of postoperative complications, such as rejection, is crucial for ensuring the success and long-term survival of organ transplants. Traditional histopathological examination, though effective, is an invasive procedure and poses risks of complications, making frequent use impractical. In recent years, graft-derived cell-free DNA (gd-cfDNA) has emerged as a promising non-invasive biomarker. It not only provides early warnings of rejection and other types of graft injury but also offers important information about the effectiveness of immunosuppressive therapy and prognosis. gd-cfDNA shows potential in the monitoring of organ transplants. The early, real-time information on graft injury provided by gd-cfDNA facilitates timely individualized treatment and improves patient outcomes. However, the progress of research on gd-cfDNA varies across different organs. Therefore, this article will comprehensively review the application and findings of gd-cfDNA in monitoring various solid organs, discussing the advantages, limitations, and some future research directions to aid in its clinical application.

Cell free DNA as a new prognostic biomarker for COVID-19, A prospective cohort study

Predicting the need of hospitalization and intensive care in COVID-19 patients has been challenging with current diagnostic tests since the beginning of the pandemic. We aimed to test cell free DNA (cfDNA) as a novel biomarker for COVID-19 disease severity and mortality. cfDNA concentration was quantified by RT-PCR based test. One hundred and sixty-eight patients(85 outpatients, 61 inpatients,22 ICU) included the study. Mean initial plasma cfDNA levels were significantly different (p < 0.01) in outpatients (1.190,66 ng/ml), inpatients (8.258,10 ng/ml) and ICU patients (84.806,87 ng/ml). ROC analysis showed with 95 % specificity that patients with initial cfDNA concentrations ≥6.389 ng/ml need to be hospitalized and those ≥26.104 ng/ml require ICU referral. cfDNA concentration was correlated with neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte level, CRP, AST, LDH, CK, fibrinogen, ferritin and D-dimer. Plasma cfDNA levels on admission, well correlating with disease severity and mortality in COVID-19 that found as a useful biomarker.

Elevation of Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Before Biopsy-proven Rejection in Kidney Transplant

BACKGROUND

Standard-of-care biomarkers for renal allograft rejection are lagging indicators, signaling existing organ injury. This precludes early intervention, when immunological cascades leading to rejection are most susceptible. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) shows promise as an early indicator of rejection, allowing earlier and possibly more effective treatment. This analysis was designed to assess this promise using real-world dd-cfDNA testing evidence.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of the prospective, observational ProActive registry study (NCT04091984) assessed dd-cfDNA and serum creatinine levels before biopsy in 424 patients with ≥1 dd-cfDNA test (n = 1013) in the 6 mo before biopsy.

RESULTS

Of 4667 enrolled patients, 1631 patients had ≥18 mo of follow-up data, of which 424 had a biopsy and were included in this analysis. Twenty-six biopsies showed antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), 62 showed T cell-mediated rejection, and 336 showed nonrejection; each from a unique patient. dd-cfDNA fractions were significantly elevated 5 mo before ABMR biopsies, and 2 mo before T cell-mediated rejection biopsies, compared with nonrejection biopsies. In contrast, serum creatinine did not discriminate between rejection and nonrejection in advance, or concurrent with biopsy. Among patients with nonrejection biopsies, estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly lower in cases with ≥2 increased dd-cfDNA results (≥1%), compared with those with 0 or 1 increased dd-cfDNA result.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that dd-cfDNA is an early indicator of biopsy-proven rejection, especially ABMR, suggesting a greater role for dd-cfDNA in surveillance to identify patients at high risk of ongoing or future rejection, thus requiring closer monitoring, biopsy, or other management changes.

Advancing kidney transplant outcomes: the role of urinary proteomics in graft function monitoring and rejection detection

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplantation significantly improves the lives of those with end-stage kidney disease, offering best alternative to dialysis. However, transplant success is threatened by the acute and chronic rejection mechanisms due to complex immune responses against the new organ.

AREAS COVERED

The ongoing research into biomarkers holds promise for revolutionizing the early detection and monitoring of the graft health. Liquid biopsy techniques offer a new avenue, with several diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic biomarkers showing promise in detecting and monitoring kidney diseases and an early and chronic allograft rejection.

EXPERT OPINION

Evaluating the protein composition related to kidney transplant results could lead to identifying biomarkers that provide insights into the graft functionality. Non-invasive proteomic biomarkers can drastically enhance clinical outcomes and change the way how kidney transplants are evaluated for patients and physicians if they succeed in this transition. Hence, the advancement in proteomic technologies, leads toward a significant improvement in understanding of the protein markers and molecular mechanisms linked to the outcomes of kidney transplants. However, the road from discovery to the use of such proteins in clinical practice is long, with a need for continuous validation and beyond the singular research team with comprehensive infrastructure and across research groups collaboration.

Recent Insights in Noninvasive Diagnostic for the Assessment of Kidney and Cardiovascular Outcome in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Kidney transplantation improves quality of life and prolongs survival of patients with end-stage kidney disease. However, kidney transplant recipients present a higher risk for cardiovascular events compared to the general population. Risk assessment for graft failure as well as cardiovascular events is still based on invasive procedures. Biomarkers in blood and urine, but also new diagnostic approaches like genetic or molecular testing, can be useful tools to monitor graft function and to identify patients of high cardiovascular risk. Many biomarkers have been introduced, whereas most of these biomarkers have not been implemented in clinical routine. Here, we discuss recent developments in biomarkers and diagnostic models in kidney transplant recipients. Because many factors impact graft function and cardiovascular risk, it is most likely that no biomarker will meet the highest demands and standards. We advocate to shift focus to the identification of patients benefitting from molecular and genetic testing as well as from analysis of more specific biomarkers instead of finding one biomarker fitting to all patients.

Non-invasive molecular biomarkers for monitoring solid organ transplantation: A comprehensive overview

Solid organ transplantation is a life-saving intervention for individuals with end-stage organ failure. Despite the effectiveness of immunosuppressive therapy, the risk of graft rejection persists in all viable transplants between individuals. The risk of rejection may vary depending on the degree of compatibility between the donor and recipient for both human leucocyte antigen (HLA) and non-HLA gene-encoded products. Monitoring the status of the allograft is a critical aspect of post-transplant management, with invasive biopsies being the standard of care for detecting rejection. Non-invasive biomarkers are increasingly being recognized as valuable tools for aiding in the detection of graft rejection, monitoring graft status and evaluating the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy. Here, we focus on the importance of molecular biomarkers in solid organ transplantation and their potential role in clinical practice. Conventional molecular biomarkers used in transplantation include HLA typing, detection of anti-HLA antibodies, killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor genotypes, and anti-MHC class 1-related chain A antibodies, which are important for assessing the compatibility of the donor and recipient. Emerging molecular biomarkers include the detection of donor-derived cell-free DNA, microRNAs (regulation of gene expression), exosomes (small vesicles secreted by cells), and kidney solid organ response test, in the recipient's blood for early signs of rejection. This review highlights the strengths and limitations of these molecular biomarkers and their potential role in improving transplant outcomes.

Early kinetics of donor-derived cell-free DNA after transplantation predicts renal graft recovery and long-term function

BACKGROUND

Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) upon transplantation is one of the most impactful events that the kidney graft suffers during its life. Its clinical manifestation in the recipient, delayed graft function (DGF), has serious prognostic consequences. However, the different definitions of DGF are subject to physicians' choices and centers' policies, and a more objective tool to quantify IRI is needed. Here, we propose the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) for this scope.

METHODS

ddcfDNA was assessed in 61 kidney transplant recipients of either living or deceased donors at 24 h, and 7, 14 and 30 days after transplantation using the AlloSeq cfDNA Kit (CareDx, San Francisco, CA, USA). Patients were followed-up for 6 months and 7-year graft survival was estimated through the complete and functional iBox tool.

RESULTS

Twenty-four-hour ddcfDNA was associated with functional DGF [7.20% (2.35%-15.50%) in patients with functional DGF versus 2.70% (1.55%-4.05%) in patients without it, P = .023] and 6-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (r = -0.311, P = .023). At Day 7 after transplantation, ddcfDNA was associated with dialysis duration in DGF patients (r = 0.612, P = .005) and worse 7-year iBox-estimated graft survival probability (β -0.42, P = .001) at multivariable analysis. Patients with early normalization of ddcfDNA (<0.5% at 1 week) had improved functional iBox-estimated probability of graft survival (79.5 ± 16.8%) in comparison with patients with 7-day ddcfDNA ≥0.5% (67.7 ± 24.1%) (P = .047).

CONCLUSIONS

ddcfDNA early kinetics after transplantation reflect recovery from IRI and are associated with short-, medium- and long-term graft outcome. This may provide a more objective estimate of IRI severity in comparison with the clinical-based definitions of DGF.

Cell-free DNA measurement of three genomes after allogeneic MSC therapy in kidney transplant recipients indicates early cell death of infused MSC

Introduction

Mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) therapy is a promising treatment that allows for drug minimization in clinical kidney transplantation. While it is thought that MSCs rapidly go into apoptosis after infusion, clinical evidence for this is scarce since methods to detect cell death of infused cells in vivo are lacking. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has recently gained attention as a biomarker for cell death.

Methods

In this study, we longitudinally measured cfDNA in plasma samples of the recipient, kidney donor, and allogeneic third-party MSC in the context of the Neptune study. cfDNA levels were measured at several time points before and after allogeneic MSC infusion in the 10 recipients who participated in the Neptune study. cfDNA ratios between the recipient, kidney graft, and MSC were determined.

Results

We observed a peak in MSC-derived cfDNA 4 h after the first and second infusions, after which MSC-derived cfDNA became undetectable. Generally, kidney graft-derived cfDNA remained in the baseline-level range.

Discussion

Our results support preclinical data that MSC are short-lived after infusion, also in a clinical in vivo setting, and are relevant for further research into the mechanism of action of MSC therapy.

Donor-derived cell free DNA as a biomarker in kidney transplantation

The early detection of acute rejection in the allograft is important as it provides an opportunity for timely therapeutic intervention in order to preserve graft function and achieve longer graft survival. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has emerged as a new biomarker in the field of kidney transplantation. In this review, we used data from various studies to examine the role of dd-cfDNA in comparison to creatinine and donor-specific antibodies in the early detection of transplant rejection. We also reviewed the use of dd-cfDNA in other organ transplants as well as the challenges and potential future direction for dd-cfDNA as a diagnostic tool.

Free-Circulating Nucleic Acids as Biomarkers in Patients After Solid Organ Transplantation

A number types of extracellular DNA (eg, cell-free, cfDNA) circulate in human blood, including mitochondrial, transcriptome, and regulatory DNA, usually at low concentrations. Larger amounts of cfDNA appear in any inflammatory condition, including organ damage due to a variety of reasons. The role of cfDNA in solid organ transplantation is discussed in this review as a valuable additional tool in the standard of care of transplant patients. Post-transplant monitoring requires the use of high-quality biomarkers for early detection of graft damage or rejection to be able to apply early therapeutic intervention. CfDNA complements the traditional monitoring strategies, being a risk stratification tool and an important prognostic marker. However, improving the sensitivity and specificity of cfDNA detection is necessary to facilitate personalized patient management, warranting further research in terms of measurement, test standardization, and storage, processing, and shipping. A diagnostic test (Allosure, CareDx, Inc., Brisbane, CA) for kidney, heart and lung transplant patients is now commercially available, and validation for other organs (eg, liver) is pending. To date, donor-derived cfDNA in combination with other biomarkers appears to be a promising tool in graft rejection as it is minimally invasive, time-sensitive, and cost-effective. However, improvement of sensitivity and specificity is required to facilitate personalized patient management. Whether it could be an alternate to graft biopsy remains unclear.

Understanding Donor-derived Cell-free DNA in Kidney Transplantation: An Overview and Case-based Guide for Clinicians

Kidney transplant recipients undergo lifelong monitoring of allograft function and evaluation for transplant complications. The current monitoring paradigm utilizes blood, urine, and tissue markers that are insensitive, nonspecific, or invasive to obtain. As a result, problems are detected late, after significant damage has accrued, and often beyond the time at which complete resolution is possible. Indeed, most kidney transplants eventually fail, usually because of chronic rejection and other undetected injury. There is a clear need for a transplant-specific biomarker that enables a proactive approach to monitoring via early detection of reversible pathology. A biomarker that supports timely and personalized treatment would assist in achieving the ultimate goal of improving allograft survival and limiting therapeutic toxicity to the recipient. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) has been proposed as one such transplant biomarker. Although the test is presently utilized most in the United States, it is conceivable that its use will become more widespread. This review covers aspects of ddcfDNA that support informed use of the test by general nephrologists, including the basic biology of ddcfDNA, methodological nuances of testing, and general recommendations for use in the kidney transplant population. Clinical contexts are used to illustrate evidence-supported interpretation of ddcfDNA results and subsequent management. Finally, knowledge gaps and areas for further study are discussed.

Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA and Active Rejection in Renal Allografts

Background

Renal allograft rejection contributes to significant morbidity and graft loss. In this setting, early detection of rejection is of paramount importance, which currently relies on histopathology. A reliable non-invasive marker to predict rejection would make surveillance and decision-making easier. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-Cf-DNA) has recently been reported as an emerging tool to predict rejection noninvasively. The utility of cell-free DNA in clinical practice has so far not been studied in an Indian setting. As it offers direct clinical application, we have chosen to investigate this biomarker as a tool to predict rejection.

Materials and Methods

A pilot study with convenient sample size was designed, as this is the first of its kind study so far reported from India. Patients being evaluated with a graft biopsy for graft dysfunction were included. Patients with stable graft function, defined as creatinine within 10% of their best creatinine and no proteinuria for the preceding 12 months, were also included. Ten milliliters of whole blood from each of the recipients was collected in DNA isolation tubes. Two milliliters of donor blood was also obtained in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes. All recipients also provided a buccal swab. Total cell-free DNA was extracted from 2 ml of recipient plasma using circulating DNA isolation kit. Upon identification of the donor-specific DNA marker for each of the patients from the paired donor sample, presence of the cell-free DNA fraction in the recipient's plasma was detected and quantified. Renal biopsy reports and clinical details were also recorded. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was also performed.

Results

A total of 31 patients were recruited. Twenty patients underwent graft biopsies for graft dysfunction, of which 12 patients had features of active rejection and eight had nonrejection causes of graft dysfunction. Eleven patients with stable graft were included in the study. In our study, dd-Cf-DNA performed best in predicting antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and higher grades of T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) (1B). It did not detect TCMR 1A accurately. It serves as a good marker to rule out rejection. It gave a NPV of 100% for TCMR 1B or ABMR, 100% for ABMR alone, and 81% for any rejection. dd-Cf-DNA percentages outperform absolute concentrations in their discriminatory ability.

Conclusion

We have demonstrated the diagnostic accuracy of dd-Cf-DNA in predicting active rejection of the renal allograft. It performs well in ABMR and higher grades of TCMR. This is the first of its kind study reported from India, to the best of our knowledge. This tool serves as a good rule out test for ABMR and higher grades of TCMR. It performs poorly in TCMR 1A.

Droplet digital PCR-based testing for donor-derived cell-free DNA in transplanted patients as noninvasive marker of allograft health: Methodological aspects

In solid organ transplantation, donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a promising universal noninvasive biomarker for allograft health, where high levels of dd-cfDNA indicate organ damage. Using Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR), we aimed to develop an assay setup for monitoring organ health. We aimed to identify the least distinguishable percentage-point increase in the fraction of minute amounts of cfDNA in a large cfDNA background by using assays targeting single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We mimicked a clinical sample from a recipient in a number of spike-in experiments, where cfDNA from healthy volunteers were mixed. A total of 40 assays were tested and approved by qPCR and ddPCR. Limit of detection (LOD) was demonstrated to be approximately 3 copies per reaction, observed at a fraction of 0.002%, and which would equal 6 copies per mL plasma. Limit of quantification (LOQ) was 35 copies per reaction, estimated to 0.038%. The lowest detectable increase in percentage point of dd-cfDNA was approximately 0.04%. Our results demonstrated that ddPCR has great sensitivity, high precision, and exceptional ability to quantify low levels of cfDNA. The ability to distinguish small differences in mimicking dd-cfDNA was far beyond the desired capability. While these methodological data are promising, further prospective studies are needed to determine the clinical utility of the proposed method.

Circulating Microbial Cell-Free DNA in Health and Disease

Human blood contains low biomass of circulating microbial cell-free DNA (cfmDNA) that predominantly originates from bacteria. Numerous studies have detected circulating cfmDNA in patients with infectious and non-infectious diseases, and in healthy individuals. Remarkable differences were found in the microbial composition of healthy subjects and patients compared to cohorts with various diseases or even patients with diversified prognoses, implying that these alterations may be associated with disease development. Although the function of circulating cfmDNA needs to be elucidated (whether it acts as a bystander of dysbiosis or a key player in disease development), several studies have demonstrated its potential as a non-invasive biomarker that may improve diagnosis and treatment efficacy. The origin of circulating cfmDNA is still the subject of much deliberation, but studies have identified members of various microbiome niches, including the gut, oral cavity, airways, and skin. Further studies investigating the origin and function of circulating cfmDNA are needed. Moreover, low-biomass microbiome studies are prone to contamination, therefore stringent negative experimental control reactions and decontamination frameworks are advised in order to detect genuine circulating cfmDNA.

Comparison of methods for donor-derived cell-free DNA quantification in plasma and urine from solid organ transplant recipients

In allograft monitoring of solid organ transplant recipients, liquid biopsy has emerged as a novel approach using quantification of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in plasma. Despite early clinical implementation and analytical validation of techniques, direct comparisons of dd-cfDNA quantification methods are lacking. Furthermore, data on dd-cfDNA in urine is scarce and high-throughput sequencing-based methods so far have not leveraged unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) for absolute dd-cfDNA quantification. Different dd-cfDNA quantification approaches were compared in urine and plasma of kidney and liver recipients: A) Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) using allele-specific detection of seven common HLA-DRB1 alleles and the Y chromosome; B) high-throughput sequencing (HTS) using a custom QIAseq DNA panel targeting 121 common polymorphisms; and C) a commercial dd-cfDNA quantification method (AlloSeq® cfDNA, CareDx). Dd-cfDNA was quantified as %dd-cfDNA, and for ddPCR and HTS using UMIs additionally as donor copies. In addition, relative and absolute dd-cfDNA levels in urine and plasma were compared in clinically stable recipients. The HTS method presented here showed a strong correlation of the %dd-cfDNA with ddPCR (R 2 = 0.98) and AlloSeq® cfDNA (R 2 = 0.99) displaying only minimal to no proportional bias. Absolute dd-cfDNA copies also correlated strongly (τ = 0.78) between HTS with UMI and ddPCR albeit with substantial proportional bias (slope: 0.25; 95%-CI: 0.19-0.26). Among 30 stable kidney transplant recipients, the median %dd-cfDNA in urine was 39.5% (interquartile range, IQR: 21.8-58.5%) with 36.6 copies/μmol urinary creatinine (IQR: 18.4-109) and 0.19% (IQR: 0.01-0.43%) with 5.0 copies/ml (IQR: 1.8-12.9) in plasma without any correlation between body fluids. The median %dd-cfDNA in plasma from eight stable liver recipients was 2.2% (IQR: 0.72-4.1%) with 120 copies/ml (IQR: 85.0-138) while the median dd-cfDNA copies/ml was below 0.1 in urine. This first head-to-head comparison of methods for absolute and relative quantification of dd-cfDNA in urine and plasma supports a method-independent %dd-cfDNA cutoff and indicates the suitability of the presented HTS method for absolute dd-cfDNA quantification using UMIs. To evaluate the utility of dd-cfDNA in urine for allograft surveillance, absolute levels instead of relative amounts will most likely be required given the extensive variability of %dd-cfDNA in stable kidney recipients.

Longitudinal Evaluation of Donor-Derived Cellfree DNA in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Donor-derived cellfree DNA (cfDNA) is a less-invasive marker of allograft injury compared with kidney biopsy. However, donor-derived cfDNA has not yet been extensively tested in children, where the test may have different characteristics.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We assayed donor-derived cfDNA (AlloSure; CareDx) from 290 stored plasma samples from a prospective biobank at our center, collected from 57 children monthly in the first year postkidney transplant between January 2013 and December 2019. We assessed the kinetic changes in donor-derived cfDNA levels within the first year post-transplant. We analyzed donor-derived cfDNA levels for associations with biopsy-proven acute rejection using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to longitudinal plasma and urine BK viral loads using linear mixed models. We analyzed the prognostic effect of an elevated donor-derived cfDNA level on the eGFR 30 days after the assay via Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample tests or on measured GFR or interstitial fibrosis at 12 months post-transplant.

RESULTS

The donor-derived cfDNA levels in children remained persistently elevated for at least 4 months post-transplant, more so if there is greater disparity in size between the donor and the recipient, before reaching a steady low level. A donor-derived cfDNA level of >1% discriminated between biopsy-proven acute rejection with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.71 to 0.93). During BK viruria or viremia, patients had a significantly higher median donor-derived cfDNA than before or after and a significant rise within the same patient. A donor-derived cfDNA of >0.5% predicted a wider spread in the eGFR over the next 30 days but not the 12-month outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In children, donor-derived cfDNA is a valuable, less invasive biomarker for assessment of allograft rejection and injury.

PODCAST

This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2022_10_27_CJN03840322.mp3.

Cell-free DNA in lung transplantation: research tool or clinical workhorse?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent evidence indicates that plasma donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a sensitive biomarker for the detection of underlying allograft injury, including rejection and infection. In this review, we will cover the latest evidence revolving around dd-cfDNA in lung transplantation and its role in both advancing mechanistic insight into disease states in lung transplant recipients as well as its potential clinical utility.

RECENT FINDINGS

Plasma dd-cfDNA increases in the setting of allograft injury, including in primary graft dysfunction, acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection and infection. Dd-cfDNA has demonstrated good performance characteristics for the detection of various allograft injury states, most notably with a high negative-predictive value for detection of acute rejection. Elevated levels of dd-cfDNA in the early posttransplant period, reflecting molecular evidence of lung allograft injury, are associated with increased risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction and death.

SUMMARY

As a quantitative, molecular biomarker of lung allograft injury, dd-cfDNA holds great promise in clinical and research settings for advancing methods of posttransplant surveillance monitoring, diagnosis of allograft injury states, monitoring adequacy of immunosuppression, risk stratification and unlocking pathophysiological mechanisms of various disease.

Cell-free DNA as a solid-organ transplant biomarker: technologies and approaches

High-quality biomarkers that detect emergent graft damage and/or rejection after solid-organ transplantation offer new opportunities to improve post-transplant monitoring, allow early therapeutic intervention and facilitate personalized patient management. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (DD-cfDNA) is a particularly exciting minimally invasive biomarker because it has the potential to be quantitative, time-sensitive and cost-effective. Increased DD-cfDNA has been associated with graft damage and rejection episodes. Efforts are underway to further improve sensitivity and specificity. This review summarizes the procedures used to process and detect DD-cfDNA, measurement of DD-cfDNA in clinical transplantation, approaches for improving sensitivity and specificity and long-term prospects as a transplant biomarker to supplement traditional organ monitoring and invasive biopsies.

The Application of Nanoparticles in Diagnosis and Treatment of Kidney Diseases

Nanomedicine is currently showing great promise for new methods of diagnosing and treating many diseases, particularly in kidney disease and transplantation. The unique properties of nanoparticles arise from the diversity of size effects, used to design targeted nanoparticles for specific cells or tissues, taking renal clearance and tubular secretion mechanisms into account. The design of surface particles on nanoparticles offers a wide range of possibilities, among which antibodies play an important role. Nanoparticles find applications in encapsulated drug delivery systems containing immunosuppressants and other drugs, in imaging, gene therapies and many other branches of medicine. They have the potential to revolutionize kidney transplantation by reducing and preventing ischemia-reperfusion injury, more efficiently delivering drugs to the graft site while avoiding systemic effects, accurately localizing and visualising the diseased site and enabling continuous monitoring of graft function. So far, there are known nanoparticles with no toxic effects on human tissue, although further studies are still needed to confirm their safety.

Validation and clinical outcome in assessing donor-derived cell-free DNA monitoring insights of kidney allografts with longitudinal surveillance (ADMIRAL) study

The use of routine monitoring of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) after kidney transplant may allow clinicians to identify subclinical allograft injury and intervene prior to development of clinically evident graft injury. To evaluate this, data from 1092 kidney transplant recipients monitored for dd-cfDNA over a three year period was analyzed to assess the association of dd-cfDNA with histologic evidence of allograft rejection. Elevation of dd-cfDNA (0.5% or more) was significantly correlated with clinical and subclinical allograft rejection. dd-cfDNA values of 0.5% or more were associated with a nearly three-fold increase in risk development of de novo donor specific antibodies (hazard ratio 2.71) and were determined to be elevated a median of 91 days (inter quartile range of 30-125 days) ahead of donor specific antibody identification. Persistently elevated dd-cfDNA (more than one result above the 0.5% threshold) predicted over a 25% decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate over three years (hazard ratio 1.97). Therefore, routine monitoring of dd-cfDNA allowed early identification of clinically important graft injury. Biomarker monitoring complemented histology and traditional laboratory surveillance strategies as a prognostic marker and risk-stratification tool post-transplant. Thus, persistently low dd-cfDNA levels may accurately identify allograft quiescence, or absence of injury, paving the way for personalization of immunosuppression trials.

Cell-free DNA diagnostics in transplantation utilizing next generation sequencing

The use of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) to interrogate cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as a transplant diagnostic provides a crucial step in improving the accuracy of post-transplant monitoring of allograft health. cfDNA interrogation provides a powerful, yet minimally invasive, biomarker for disease and tissue injury. cfDNA can be isolated from a variety of body fluids and analyzed using bioinformatics to unlock its origins. Furthermore, cfDNA characteristics can reveal the mechanisms and conditions under which it was generated and released. In transplantation, donor-derived cfDNA monitoring provides a tool for identifying active allograft injury at the time of transplant, infection, and rejection. Multiple detection and interrogation methods for cfDNA detection are now being evaluated for clinical validity and hold the promise to provide minimally invasive, quantitative, and reproducible measures of allograft injury across organ types.

Current Trends in Cell-Free DNA Applications. Scoping Review of Clinical Trials

We aimed to summarize the current knowledge about the trends in cfDNA application based on the analysis of clinical trials registered until April 2021. International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched with the keywords: "cf-DNA"; "Circulating DNA"; "Deoxyribonucleic Acid"; and "Cell-Free Deoxyribonucleic Acid". Of 605 clinical trials, we excluded 237 trials, and 368 remaining ones were subject to further analysis. The subject, number of participants, and study design were analyzed. Our scoping review revealed three main trends: oncology (n = 255), non-invasive prenatal diagnostic (n = 48), and organ transplantation (n = 41), and many (n = 22) less common such as sepsis, sport, or autoimmune diseases in 368 clinical trials. Clinical trials are translating theory into clinical care. However, the diagnostic value of cfDNA remains controversial, and diagnostic accuracy still needs to be evaluated. Thus, further studies are necessary until cfDNA turns into a standard in clinical practice.

The clinical value of donor-derived cell-free DNA measurements in kidney transplantation

Early diagnosis is critical to minimizing the damage rejection can do to the transplanted kidney. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) represents non-encapsulated fragmented DNA that is continuously shed into the bloodstream from the allograft undergoing injury, with a half-life of about 30 min. This article reviews the available evidence regarding the diagnostic value of dd-cfDNA in kidney transplantation, as a result of which two assays, Allosure and Prospera, have garnered Medicare approval. We provide information on important scenarios and contexts including antibody-mediated rejection, T-cell mediated rejection, pre-test probability of rejection, timing of the test, repeat transplants, and background cell-free DNA levels to help our understanding of the test characteristics and utility of these assays in clinical practice. Data on multimodality assays including gene expression profiles and serial monitoring of dd-cfDNA in high risk situations are emerging.

Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA for Acute Rejection Monitoring in Heart and Lung Transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute allograft rejection is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in heart and lung transplantation. Unfortunately, the current monitoring gold standard-biopsy plus histopathology-has several limitations. Plasma donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has emerged as a potentially valuable biomarker for rejection that addresses some of the limitations of biopsy. This review covers the current state of the evidence and future directions for the use of dd-cfDNA in the monitoring of acute rejection.

RECENT FINDINGS

The results of several observational cohort studies demonstrate that levels of dd-cfDNA increase in the setting of acute cellular rejection and antibody-mediated rejection in both heart and lung transplant recipients. dd-cfDNA demonstrates acceptable performance characteristics, but low specificity for the detection of underlying injury from rejection or infection. In particular, the high negative predictive value of the test in both heart and lung transplant patients provides the potential for its use as a screening tool for the monitoring of allograft health rather than tissue biopsy alone.

SUMMARY

Existing evidence shows that dd-cfDNA is a safe, convenient, and reliable method of acute rejection monitoring in heart and lung transplant recipients. Further studies are required to validate threshold values for clinical use and determine its role in the diagnosis of alternative forms of allograft injury.