Whole-Body Pharmacokinetics and Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Monomethyl Auristatin E (MMAE)

Therapeutic antibodies in oncology: an immunopharmacological overview

The biotechnological development of monoclonal antibodies and their immunotherapeutic use in oncology have grown exponentially in the last decade, becoming the first-line therapy for some types of cancer. Their mechanism of action is based on the ability to regulate the immune system or by interacting with targets that are either overexpressed in tumor cells, released into the extracellular milieu or involved in processes that favor tumor growth. In addition, the intrinsic characteristics of each subclass of antibodies provide specific effector functions against the tumor by activating antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, complement-dependent cytotoxicity, and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis, among other mechanisms. The rational design and engineering of monoclonal antibodies have improved their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic features, thus optimizing the therapeutic regimens administered to cancer patients and improving their clinical outcomes. The selection of the immunoglobulin G subclass, modifications to its crystallizable region (Fc), and conjugation of radioactive substances or antineoplastic drugs may all improve the antitumor effects of therapeutic antibodies. This review aims to provide insights into the immunological and pharmacological aspects of therapeutic antibodies used in oncology, with a rational approach at molecular modifications that can be introduced into these biological tools, improving their efficacy in the treatment of cancer.

Monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), a payload for multiple antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), demonstrates differential red blood cell partitioning across human and animal species

Background: Monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) has been used as a payload for several Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). It is known that MMAE is released from the ADC following binding, internalisation and proteolytic degradation in target tissues. A striking discrepancy in systemic MMAE levels has been observed across species with 50-fold higher MMAE levels in human than that in rodents when normalised by ADC dose with unknown mechanism.Hypothesis and purpose: Multiple factors could affect systemic MMAE levels such as production and elimination of unconjugated MMAE following ADC dosing. In this study, we have explored whether MMAE displays differential red blood cell (RBC) partitioning across species that may contribute to the different MMAE levels seen between human and animals.Experiments: To determine MMAE RBC partitioning, tritium labelled MMAE ([3H]-MMAE) was incubated in whole blood from mice, rats, monkeys and humans in vitro, then RBC partitioning was determined and compared across species. To test whether MMAE released from the ADC would show any difference in RBC partitioning, pinatuzumab vedotin or polatuzumab vedotin was administered to mice, rats, and monkeys. MMAE levels were measured in both blood and plasma, and the ratios of MMAE levels were calculated as blood-to-plasma ratio (in vivo RBC partitioning).Results: Our in vitro data showed that unconjugated MMAE has a species-dependent RBC partitioning with strong RBC partitioning in mouse, rat, followed by monkey blood, whereas minimal RBC partitioning was seen in human blood. Incubation of 2 nM of MMAE in mouse blood resulted in a blood-to-plasma ratio of 11.8 ± 0.291, followed by rat, monkey, and human at 2.36 ± 0.0825, 1.57 ± 0.0250, and 0.976 ± 0.0620, respectively. MMAE RBC partitioning is also concentration-dependent, with an inverse relationship between RBC partitioning and MMAE concentration (higher RBC partitioning at lower concentration). In vivo dosing of pinatuzumab vedotin in mouse displayed systemic MMAE at about a 5-fold higher blood concentration compared to plasma concentration once MMAE reached a pseudo-equilibrium, while systemic MMAE from blood and plasma concentration showed a 1.65-fold difference in rat.Implication and conclusion: These data demonstrated that MMAE has a distinct RBC partitioning across different species, which may contribute to, at least in part, to the differential in the systemic MMAE levels observed in vivo between preclinical and clinical studies. These findings highlight the importance of fully characterising the ADME properties of both the ADC and its payload, to enable better translation from animals to human for ADC development.

Extended Pharmacokinetics Improve Site-Specific Prodrug Activation Using Radiation

Radiotherapy is commonly used to treat cancer, and localized energy deposited by radiotherapy has the potential to chemically uncage prodrugs; however, it has been challenging to demonstrate prodrug activation that is both sustained in vivo and truly localized to tumors without affecting off-target tissues. To address this, we developed a series of novel phenyl-azide-caged, radiation-activated chemotherapy drug-conjugates alongside a computational framework for understanding corresponding pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) behaviors. We especially focused on an albumin-bound prodrug of monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) and found it blocked tumor growth in mice, delivered a 130-fold greater amount of activated drug to irradiated tumor versus unirradiated tissue, was 7.5-fold more efficient than a non albumin-bound prodrug, and showed no appreciable toxicity compared to free or cathepsin-activatable drugs. These data guided computational modeling of drug action, which indicated that extended pharmacokinetics can improve localized and cumulative drug activation, especially for payloads with low vascular permeability and diffusivity and particularly in patients receiving daily treatments of conventional radiotherapy for weeks. This work thus offers a quantitative PK/PD framework and proof-of-principle experimental demonstration of how extending prodrug circulation can improve its localized activity in vivo.

Antibody drug conjugates: Design implications for clinicians

OBJECTIVE

There are currently 11 antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) that are FDA approved for use in oncologic disease states, with many more in the pipeline. The authors aim to review the pharmacokinetic profiles of the components of ADCs to engage pharmacist practitioners in practical considerations in the care of patients. This article provides an overview on the use of ADCs in the setting of organ dysfunction, drug-drug interactions, and management of on- and off-target adverse effects.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search of the literature on ADCs through September 2023 was conducted. Clinical trials as well as articles on ADC design and functional components, adverse effects, and pharmacokinetics were reviewed. Reviewed literature included prescribing information as well as tertiary sources and primary literature.

DATA SUMMARY

A total of 11 ADCs were reviewed for the purpose of this article. A description of the mechanism of action and structure of ADCs is outlined, and a table containing description of each currently FDA-approved ADC is included. Various mechanisms of ADC toxicity are reviewed, including how ADC structure may be implicated.

CONCLUSION

It is imperative that pharmacist clinicians understand the design and function of each component of an ADC to continue to assess new approvals for use in oncology patients. Understanding the design of the ADC can help a pharmacy practitioner compare and contrast adverse effect profiles to support their multidisciplinary teams and to engage patients in education and management of their care.

Development of a generalized pharmacokinetic model to characterize clinical pharmacokinetics of monomethyl auristatin E-based antibody-drug conjugates

AIMS

This study aims to develop a generalized pharmacokinetic (PK) model for monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE)-based antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) that can simultaneously capture the PK of multiple ADC analytes commonly measured in the clinic.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted to collect PK data on MMAE-based ADCs from clinical trials. From each study, PK profiles of total antibody, the ADC, conjugated MMAE, and unconjugated MMAE, were extracted. These data were pooled and dose-normalized to evaluate the generalizability of PK across various ADCs and dose levels. Upon confirming PK generalizability, a generalized PK model for MMAE-based ADCs was developed using the entire dataset. Furthermore, exposure metrics ( C max and AUC) reported across the range of doses were combined to establish linear relationships between dose and exposure metrics for MMAE-based ADCs.

RESULTS

A total of 109 PK profiles from 18 distinct MMAE-based ADCs were gathered. The dose-normalized PK profiles supported the generalizability of PK for MMAE-based ADCs. A generalized PK model was developed, which enabled capturing the PK data for 4 ADC analytes across all collected MMAE-based ADCs. A linear relationship between dose and PK exposure metrics was established, enabling the prediction of typical exposure values across different doses for MMAE-based ADCs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study comprehensively analysed clinical PK data from different valine-citrulline (vc)-MMAE-based ADCs. The generalized PK model developed here serves as an important tool for a priori prediction of the PK for multiple ADC analytes in clinical settings and lays the foundation for establishing generalized exposure-response and exposure-toxicity correlations for MMAE-based ADCs.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates in the Pipeline for Treatment of Melanoma: Target and Pharmacokinetic Considerations

Melanoma is an aggressive, rapidly developing form of skin cancer that affects about 22 per 100,000 individuals. Treatment options for melanoma patients are limited and typically involve surgical excision of moles and chemotherapy. Survival has been improved in recent years through targeted small molecule inhibitors and antibody-based immunotherapies. However, the long-term side effects that arise from taking chemotherapies can negatively impact the lives of patients because they lack specificity and impact healthy cells along with the cancer cells. Antibody-drug conjugates are a promising new class of drugs for the treatment of melanoma. This review focuses on the development of antibody-drug conjugates for melanoma and discusses the existing clinical trials of antibody-drug conjugates and their use as a melanoma treatment. So far, the antibody-drug conjugates have struggled from efficacy problems, with modest effects at best, leading many to be discontinued for melanoma. At the same time, conjugates such as AMT-253, targeting melanoma cell adhesion molecule, and mecbotamab vedotin  targeting AXL receptor tyrosine kinase, are among the most exciting for melanoma treatment in the future.

Construction of a versatile fusion protein for targeted therapy and immunotherapy

Antibody (Ab)-based drugs have been widely used in targeted therapies and immunotherapies, leading to significant improvements in tumor therapy. However, the failure of Ab therapy due to the loss of target antigens or Ab modifications that affect its function limits its application. In this study, we expanded the application of antibodies (Abs) by constructing a fusion protein as a versatile tool for Ab-based target cell detection, delivery, and therapy. We first constructed a SpaC Catcher (SpaCC for short) fusion protein that included the C domains of Staphylococcal protein A (SpaC) and the SpyCatcher. SpaCC conjugated with SpyTag-X (S-X) to form the SpaCC-S-X complex, which binds non-covalently to an Ab to form the Ab-SpaCC-S-X protein complex. The "X" can be a variety of small molecules such as fluoresceins, cell-penetrating peptide TAT, Monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), and DNA. We found that Ab-SpaCC-S-FITC(-TAT) could be used for target cell detection and delivery. Besides, we synthesized the Ab-SpaCC-SN3-MMAE complex by linking Ab with MMAE by SpaCC, which improved the cytotoxicity of small molecule toxins. Moreover, we constructed an Ab-DNA complex by conjugating SpaCC with the aptamer (Ap) and found that Ab-SpaCC-SN3-Ap boosted the tumor-killing function of T-cells by retargeting tumor cells. Thus, we developed a multifunctional tool that could be used for targeted therapies and immunotherapies, providing a cheap and convenient novel drug development strategy.

Polatuzumab vedotin pharmacokinetics in a hemodialysis patient with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

PURPOSE

Chemotherapy for the hemodialysis (HD) patient is a challenging situation because it requires special considerations including dose modifications and timing of drug administration in relation with HD sessions. Polaltuzumab vedotin (PV), an antibody-drug conjugate in which monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) is linked to an anti-CD79b monoclonal antibody, is an extremely promising therapeutic for treating diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but the pharmacokinetics are unknown in HD patients.

METHODS

We carried out pharmacokinetic studies of PV when administered at 1.2 mg/kg to a DLBCL patient on HD, and compared the results with that of non-HD patients. PV was administered in conjunction with bendamustine and rituximab.

RESULTS

Serum concentration-time curves of both antibodyconjugated and unconjugated MMAE in the presented HD patient were similar compared to that of non-HD patients. We also demonstrate that elimination of both antibody-conjugated and unconjugated MMAE through HD is limited. PV administration at 1.2 mg/kg to an HD patient was also clinically feasible, and no signs of peripheral neuropathy were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

PV therapy may be a relatively safe treatment method for DLBCL patients on HD.

Streptavidin-drug conjugates streamline optimization of antibody-based conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) conditioning using antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) is a promising alternative to conventional chemotherapy- and irradiation-based conditioning regimens. The drug payload bound to an ADC is a key contributor to its efficacy and potential toxicities; however, a comparison of HSCT conditioning ADCs produced with different toxic payloads has not been performed. Indeed, ADC optimization studies in general are hampered by the inability to produce and screen multiple combinations of antibody and drug payload in a rapid, cost-effective manner. Herein, we used Click chemistry to covalently conjugate four different small molecule payloads to streptavidin; these streptavidin-drug conjugates can then be joined to any biotinylated antibody to produce stable, indirectly conjugated ADCs. Evaluating CD45-targeted ADCs produced with this system, we found the pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD) dimer SGD-1882 was the most effective payload for targeting mouse and human hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and acute myeloid leukemia cells. In murine syngeneic HSCT studies, a single dose of CD45-PBD enabled near-complete conversion to donor hematopoiesis. Finally, human CD45-PBD provided significant antitumor benefit in a patient-derived xenograft model of acute myeloid leukemia. As our streptavidin-drug conjugates were generated in-house with readily accessible equipment, reagents, and routine molecular biology techniques, we anticipate this flexible platform will facilitate the evaluation and optimization of ADCs for myriad targeting applications.

Development of antibody-drug conjugates in cancer: Overview and prospects

In recent years, remarkable breakthroughs have been reported on antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), with 15 ADCs successfully entering the market over the past decade. This substantial development has positioned ADCs as one of the fastest-growing domains in the realm of anticancer drugs, demonstrating their efficacy in treating a wide array of malignancies. Nonetheless, there is still an unmet clinical need for wider application, better efficacy, and fewer side effects of ADCs. An ADC generally comprises an antibody, a linker and a payload, and the combination has profound effects on drug structure, pharmacokinetic profile and efficacy. Hence, optimization of the key components provides an opportunity to develop ADCs with higher potency and fewer side effects. In this review, we comprehensively reviewed the current development and the prospects of ADC, provided an analysis of marketed ADCs and the ongoing pipelines globally as well as in China, highlighted several ADC platforms and technologies specific to different pharmaceutical enterprises and biotech companies, and also discussed the new related technologies, possibility of next-generation ADCs and the directions of clinical research.

A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model for predicting doxorubicin disposition in multiple tissue levels and quantitative toxicity assessment

Doxorubicin is a widely-used chemotherapeutic drug, however its high toxicity poses a significant challenge for its clinical use. To address this issue, a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was implemented to quantitatively assess doxorubicin toxicity at cellular scale. Due to its unique pharmacokinetic behavior (e.g. high volume of distribution and affinity to extra-plasma tissue compartments), we proposed a modified PBPK model structure and developed the model with multispecies extrapolation to compensate for the limitation of obtaining clinical tissue data. Our model predicted the disposition of doxorubicin in multiple tissues including clinical tissue data with an overall absolute average fold error (AAFE) of 2.12. The model's performance was further validated with 8 clinical datasets in combined with intracellular doxorubicin concentration with an average AAFE of 1.98. To assess the potential cellular toxicity, toxicity levels and area under curve (AUC) were defined for different dosing regimens in toxic and non-toxic scenarios. The cellular concentrations of doxorubicin in multiple organ sites associated with commonly observed adverse effects (AEs) were simulated and calculated the AUC for quantitative assessments. Our findings supported the clinical dosing regimen of 75 mg/m2 with a 21-day interval and suggest that slow infusion and separated single high doses may lower the risk of developing AEs from a cellular level, providing valuable insights for the risk assessment of doxorubicin chemotherapy. In conclusion, our work highlights the potential of PBPK modelling to provide quantitative assessments of cellular toxicity and supports the use of clinical dosing regimens to mitigate the risk of adverse effects.

Advances in non-radioactive PSMA-targeted small molecule-drug conjugates in the treatment of prostate cancer

Most patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa) will develop metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after androgen deprivation therapy, at this time the tumor enters the end stage, and the clinical treatment is very complicated, which requires rationalization of drugs to prolong the life of patients while improving their quality of life. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a promising biological target for drug delivery in mCRPC due to its high level of specific expression in PCa cell membranes and low expression in normal tissues. Non-radioactive PSMA-targeted small molecule-drug conjugates (SMDCs) are gradually becoming a heat of discovery due to their good affinity and specificity; simple synthesis steps and transport management methods. Non-radioactive PSMA-targeted SMDCs under investigation can be divided into two categories: SMDCs and dual-ligand coupled drugs, among which SMDCs are the most widespread form of this type of conjugate. SMDCs have three key components: cytotoxic load, linker, and small molecule targeting ligands. SMDCs are internalized into the cell after binding to PSMA on the cell membrane and stored in endosomes and lysosomes, where they are usually enzymatically cleaved to allow precise release of cytotoxic molecules and uniform diffusion into the tumor tissue. More than a dozen non-radioactive PSMA-targeted SMDCs have been developed, many of which have shown favorable properties in both in vitro and in vivo evaluations, demonstrating more favorable results than unmodified cytotoxic drugs. Therefore, non-radioactive PSMA-targeted SMDCs have great therapeutic potential for mCRPC as a form of targeted therapy.

Advances in targeted therapy for pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer (PC) represents a group of malignant tumours originating from pancreatic duct epithelial cells and acinar cells, and the 5-year survival rate of PC patients is only approximately 12%. Molecular targeted drugs are specific drugs designed to target and block oncogenes, and they have become promising strategies for the treatment of PC. Compared to traditional chemotherapy drugs, molecular targeted drugs have greater targeting precision, and they have significant therapeutic effects and minimal side effects. This article reviews several molecular targeted drugs that are currently in the experimental stage for the treatment of PC; these include antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), aptamer-drug conjugates (ApDCs) and peptide-drug conjugates (PDCs). ADCs can specifically recognize cell surface antigens and reduce systemic exposure and toxicity of chemotherapy drugs. By delivering nucleic acid drugs to target cells, the targeting RNA of ApDCs can inhibit the expression or translation of mutated genes, thereby inhibiting tumour development. Moreover, PDCs can effectively penetrate tumour cells, and the peptide groups in PDCs preferentially target tumour cells with minimal side effects. In the targeted therapy of PC, molecular targeted drugs have very broad prospects, which provides new hope for the clinical treatment of PC patients and is worth further research.

Comparison of monoclonal antibody disposition predictions using different physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling platforms

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models can be used to leverage physiological and in vitro data to predict monoclonal antibody (mAb) concentrations in serum and tissues. However, it is currently not known how consistent predictions of mAb disposition are across PBPK modelling platforms. In this work PBPK simulations of IgG, adalimumab and infliximab were compared between three platforms (Simcyp, PK-Sim, and GastroPlus). Accuracy of predicted serum and tissue concentrations was assessed using observed data collected from the literature. Physiological and mAb related input parameters were also compared and sensitivity analyses were carried out to evaluate model behavior when input values were altered. Differences in serum kinetics of IgG between platforms were minimal for a dose of 1 mg/kg, but became more noticeable at higher dosages (> 100 mg/kg) and when reference (healthy) physiological input values were altered. Predicted serum concentrations of both adalimumab and infliximab were comparable across platforms, but were noticeably higher than observed values. Tissue concentrations differed remarkably between the platforms, both for total- and interstitial fluid (ISF) concentrations. The accuracy of total tissue concentrations was within a three-fold of observed values for all tissues, except for brain tissue concentrations, which were overpredicted. Predictions of tissue ISF concentrations were less accurate and were best captured by GastroPlus. Overall, these simulations show that the different PBPK platforms generally predict similar mAb serum concentrations, but variable tissue concentrations. Caution is therefore warranted when PBPK models are used to simulate effect site tissue concentrations of mAbs without data to verify the predictions.

Peripheral neuropathy associated with monomethyl auristatin E-based antibody-drug conjugates

Since the successful approval of gemtuzumab ozogamicin, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as a pivotal category of targeted therapies for cancer. Among these ADCs, the use of monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) as a payload is prevalent in the development of ADC drugs, which has significantly improved overall therapeutic efficacy against various malignancies. However, increasing clinical observations have raised concerns regarding the potential nervous system toxicity associated with MMAE-based ADCs. Specifically, a higher incidence of peripheral neuropathy has been reported in ADCs incorporating MMAE as payloads. Considering the increasing global use of MMAE-based ADCs, it is imperative to provide an inclusive overview of diagnostic and management strategies for this adverse event. In this review, we examine current information and what future research directions are required to better understand and manage this type of clinical challenge.

A mouse model of sensory neuropathy induced by a long course of monomethyl-auristatin E treatment

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are anticancer drugs consisting of a monoclonal antibody, targeting selective tumor antigens, to which has been frequently associated a highly potent cytotoxic agent, the monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) using a chemical linker. MMAE is a tubulin polymerization inhibitor derived from dolastin-10. These MMAE-ADCs are responsible for peripheral nerve toxicities. Our objective was to develop and characterize a mouse model of MMAE-induced peripheral neuropathy induced by free MMAE injections. MMAE was injected in Swiss mice at 50 μg/kg i.p. every other day for 7 weeks. Assessments of motor and sensory nerve functions were performed once a week on MMAE and Vehicle-treated mice. Sciatic nerve and paw skin were removed at the end of experiment for subsequent immunofluorescence and morphological analysis. MMAE did not affect motor coordination, muscular strength and heat nociception, but significantly induced tactile allodynia in MMAE-treated mice compared with Vehicle-treated mice from day 35 to day 49. MMAE significantly reduced myelinated and unmyelinated axon densities in sciatic nerves and led to a loss of intraepidermal nerve fiber in paw skin. In summary, long course of low dose of MMAE induced a peripheral sensory neuropathy associated with nerve degeneration, without general state alteration. This model may represent a ready accessible tool to screen neuroprotective strategies in the context of peripheral neuropathies induced by MMAE-ADCs.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to predict drug-drug interactions with the antibody-drug conjugate enfortumab vedotin

Enfortumab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) comprised of a Nectin-4-directed antibody and monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), which is primarily eliminated through P-glycoprotein (P-gp)-mediated excretion and cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4)-mediated metabolism. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed to predict effects of combined P-gp with CYP3A4 inhibitor/inducer (ketoconazole/rifampin) on MMAE exposure when coadministered with enfortumab vedotin and study enfortumab vedotin with CYP3A4 (midazolam) and P-gp (digoxin) substrate exposure. A PBPK model was built for enfortumab vedotin and unconjugated MMAE using the PBPK simulator ADC module. A similar model was developed with brentuximab vedotin, an ADC with the same valine-citrulline-MMAE linker as enfortumab vedotin, for MMAE drug-drug interaction (DDI) verification using clinical data. The DDI simulation predicted a less-than-2-fold increase in MMAE exposure with enfortumab vedotin plus ketoconazole (MMAE geometric mean ratio [GMR] for maximum concentration [Cmax], 1.15; GMR for area under the time-concentration curve from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration [AUClast], 1.38). Decreased MMAE exposure above 50% but below 80% was observed with enfortumab vedotin plus rifampin (MMAE GMR Cmax, 0.72; GMR AUClast, 0.47). No effect of enfortumab vedotin on midazolam or digoxin systemic exposure was predicted. Results suggest that combination enfortumab vedotin, P-gp, and a CYP3A4 inhibitor may result in increased MMAE exposure and patients should be monitored for potential adverse effects. Combination P-gp and a CYP3A4 inducer may result in decreased MMAE exposure. No exposure change is expected for CYP3A4 or P-gp substrates when combined with enfortumab vedotin.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier Not applicable.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Antibody-Drug Conjugates Administered via Subcutaneous and Intratumoral Routes

We hypothesize that different routes of administration may lead to altered pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) behavior of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and may help to improve their therapeutic index. To evaluate this hypothesis, here we performed PK/PD evaluation for an ADC administered via subcutaneous (SC) and intratumoral (IT) routes. Trastuzumab-vc-MMAE was used as the model ADC, and NCI-N87 tumor-bearing xenografts were used as the animal model. The PK of multiple ADC analytes in plasma and tumors, and the in vivo efficacy of ADC, after IV, SC, and IT administration were evaluated. A semi-mechanistic PK/PD model was developed to characterize all the PK/PD data simultaneously. In addition, local toxicity of SC-administered ADC was investigated in immunocompetent and immunodeficient mice. Intratumoral administration was found to significantly increase tumor exposure and anti-tumor activity of ADC. The PK/PD model suggested that the IT route may provide the same efficacy as the IV route at an increased dosing interval and reduced dose level. SC administration of ADC led to local toxicity and reduced efficacy, suggesting difficulty in switching from IV to SC route for some ADCs. As such, this manuscript provides unprecedented insight into the PK/PD behavior of ADCs after IT and SC administration and paves the way for clinical evaluation of these routes.

Payload-Binding Fab Fragments Increase the Therapeutic Index of MMAE Antibody-Drug Conjugates

Monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) is a potent tubulin inhibitor that is used as the payload for four FDA-approved antibody-drug conjugates (ADC). Deconjugated MMAE readily diffuses into untargeted cells, resulting in off-target toxicity. Here, we report the development and evaluation of a humanized Fab fragment (ABC3315) that enhances the therapeutic selectivity of MMAE ADCs. ABC3315 increased the IC50 of MMAE against human cancer cell lines by > 500-fold with no impact on the cytotoxicity of MMAE ADCs, including polatuzumab vedotin (PV) and trastuzumab-vc-MMAE (TvcMMAE). Coadministration of ABC3315 did not reduce the efficacy of PV or TvcMMAE in xenograft tumor models. Coadministration of ABC3315 with 80 mg/kg TvcMMAE significantly (P < 0.0001) increased the cumulative amount of MMAE that was excreted in urine 0 to 4 days after administration from 789.4±19.0 nanograms (TvcMMAE alone) to 2625±206.8 nanograms (for mice receiving TvcMMAE with coadministration of ABC3315). Mice receiving 80 mg/kg TvcMMAE and PBS exhibited a significant drop in white blood cell counts (P = 0.025) and red blood cell counts (P = 0.0083) in comparison with control mice. No significant differences, relative to control mice, were found for white blood cell counts (P = 0.15) or for red blood cell counts (P = 0.23) for mice treated with 80 mg/kg TvcMMAE and ABC3315. Coadministration of ABC3315 with 120 mg/kg PV significantly (P = 0.045) decreased the percentage body weight loss at nadir for treated mice from 11.9%±7.0% to 4.1%±2.1%. Our results demonstrate that ABC3315, an anti-MMAE Fab fragment, decreases off-target toxicity while not decreasing antitumor efficacy, increasing the therapeutic window of MMAE ADCs.

Modular Smart Molecules for PSMA-Targeted Chemotherapy

New targeted chemotherapeutics are urgently needed to minimize off-target toxicity and reduce the high-mortality rate associated with metastatic prostate cancer. Herein, we report on the modular synthesis, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of two small-molecule-drug conjugates (SMDC) targeted to prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) incorporating either: (i) a cathepsin-B-cleavable valine-citrulline (Val-Cit), or (ii) an acid-cleavable phosphoramidate linker. Crucial components used in the design of the conjugates include: (i) CTT1298, a nanomolar affinity ligand that binds irreversibly to PSMA and has proven in past studies to rapidly internalize and shuttle payloads into PSMA-expressing prostate cancer cells, (ii) MMAE, a known potent cytotoxic payload, and (iii) an albumin-binder, proven to improve residence time of drug conjugates. At dose of 0.8 mg/kg (∼250 nmol/kg), the two SMDCs showed significant efficacy in a PSMA(+) PC3-PIP mouse model of human prostate cancer compared with controls, without inducing systemic toxicity. Though localization of the SMDCs was observed in tissues apart from the tumor, release of MMAE was observed predominantly in tumor tissue, at levels that were 2-3 orders of magnitude higher than non-target tissues. Furthermore, SMDC2, which incorporated a novel pH-responsive phosporamidate linker, demonstrated significantly improved efficacy over SMDC1 that has a Val-Cit linker, with a 100% survival over 90 days and 4 out of 8 mice showing complete tumor growth inhibition after 6 weekly doses of 0.8 mg/kg (244 nmol/kg). Our findings demonstrate the potential of irreversible PSMA inhibitors combined with pH-responsive linkers as a way to specifically deliver chemotherapeutic drugs to prostate cancer tumors with minimal toxicity.

Marine Natural Products in Clinical Use

Marine natural products are potent and promising sources of drugs among other natural products of plant, animal, and microbial origin. To date, 20 drugs from marine sources are in clinical use. Most approved marine compounds are antineoplastic, but some are also used for chronic neuropathic pain, for heparin overdosage, as haptens and vaccine carriers, and for omega-3 fatty-acid supplementation in the diet. Marine drugs have diverse structural characteristics and mechanisms of action. A considerable increase in the number of marine drugs approved for clinical use has occurred in the past few decades, which may be attributed to increasing research on marine compounds in laboratories across the world. In the present manuscript, we comprehensively studied all marine drugs that have been successfully used in the clinic. Researchers and clinicians are hopeful to discover many more drugs, as a large number of marine natural compounds are being investigated in preclinical and clinical studies.

A Review of Tisotumab Vedotin-tftv in Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of tisotumab vedotin-tftv (TV), a first-in-class vectorized anti-tissue factor (TF) antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), for the treatment of recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, and PubMed was conducted using the terms tisotumab vedotin AND cervical cancer from inception to June 30, 2022.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All applicable publications, package inserts, meeting abstracts, and clinical trials involving TV in the treatment of cervical cancer were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

TV is a fully human TF-specific monoclonal antibody conjugated to monomethyl auristatin E, which serves as a highly potent cytotoxic payload. In the pivotal phase II InnovaTV 204 clinical trial, TV demonstrated an objective response rate of 24% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16%-33%). The mean duration of response was 8.3 months. Common toxicities included abdominal pain, alopecia, conjunctivitis, constipation, decreased appetite, diarrhea, dry eye, epistaxis, nausea/vomiting, and peripheral neuropathy. Unique and/or serious adverse events warranting careful monitoring include ocular complications, hemorrhaging, peripheral neuropathies, fetal-embryo toxicity, pneumonitis, and immunogenicity.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer remains a high-risk disease with limited treatment options. Using ADCs to target tumors with aberrant expression of TF appears to be a viable treatment strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

TV is the first Food and Drug Administration-approved TF-directed ADC. With a manageable safety profile and promising anticancer activity, TV warrants consideration as a novel targeted agent for the treatment of recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Further studies are required to determine the optimal place in therapy for TV.

A Permeability- and Perfusion-based PBPK model for Improved Prediction of Concentration-time Profiles

To improve predictions of concentration‐time (C‐t) profiles of drugs, a new physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling framework (termed ‘PermQ’) has been developed. This model includes permeability into and out of capillaries, cell membranes, and intracellular lipids. New modeling components include (i) lumping of tissues into compartments based on both blood flow and capillary permeability, and (ii) parameterizing clearances in and out of membranes with apparent permeability and membrane partitioning values. Novel observations include the need for a shallow distribution compartment particularly for bases. C‐t profiles were modeled for 24 drugs (7 acidic, 5 neutral, and 12 basic) using the same experimental inputs for three different models: Rodgers and Rowland (RR), a perfusion‐limited membrane‐based model (K_p,mem), and PermQ. K_p,mem and PermQ can be directly compared since both models have identical tissue partition coefficient parameters. For the 24 molecules used for model development, errors in V_ss and t_1/2 were reduced by 37% and 43%, respectively, with the PermQ model. Errors in C‐t profiles were reduced (increased EOC) by 43%. The improvement was generally greater for bases than for acids and neutrals. Predictions were improved for all 3 models with the use of parameters optimized for the PermQ model. For five drugs in a test set, similar results were observed. These results suggest that prediction of C‐t profiles can be improved by including capillary and cellular permeability components for all tissues.

Development of a Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Whole-Body Disposition of MMAE Containing Antibody-Drug Conjugate in Mice

PURPOSE

To quantitate and mathematically characterize the whole-body pharmacokinetics (PK) of different ADC analytes following administration of an MMAE-conjugated ADC in tumor-bearing mice.

METHODS

The PK of different ADC analytes (total antibody, total drug, unconjugated drug) was measured following administration of an MMAE-conjugated ADC in tumor-bearing mice. The PK of ADC analytes was compared with the whole-body PK of the antibody and drug obtained following administration of these molecules alone. An ADC PBPK model was developed by linking antibody PBPK model with small-molecule PBPK model, where the drug was assumed to deconjugate in DAR-dependent manner.

RESULTS

Comparison of antibody biodistribution coefficient (ABC) values for total antibody suggests that conjugation of drug did not significantly affect the PK of antibody. Comparison of tissue:plasma AUC ratio (T/P) for the conjugated drug and total antibody suggests that in certain tissues (e.g., spleen) ADC may demonstrate higher deconjugation. It was observed that the tissue distribution profile of the drug can be altered following its conjugation to antibody. For example, MMAE distribution to the liver was found to increase while its distribution to the heart was found to decrease upon conjugation to antibody. MMAE exposure in the tumor was found to increase by ~20-fold following administration as conjugate (i.e., ADC). The PBPK model was able to a priori predict the PK of all three ADC analytes in plasma, tissues, and tumor reasonably well.

CONCLUSIONS

The ADC PBPK model developed here serves as a platform for translational and clinical investigations of MMAE containing ADCs.