The Influence of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria on Clinical Outcomes of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review

Association of multidrug-resistant bacteria and clinical outcomes in patients with infected diabetic foot in a Peruvian hospital: A retrospective cohort analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRB) and adverse clinical outcomes in patients with diabetic foot infection (DFI) in a Peruvian hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients treated in the Diabetic Foot Unit of a General Hospital in Lima, Peru. MDRB was defined by resistance to more than two pharmacological groups across six clinically significant genera. The primary outcome was death due to DFI complications and/or major amputation. Other outcomes included minor amputation, hospitalization, and a hospital stay longer than 14 days. Relative risks were estimated using Poisson regression for all outcomes.

RESULTS

The study included 192 DFI patients with a mean age of 59.9 years; 74% were males. A total of 80.8% exhibited MDRB. The primary outcome had an incidence rate of 23.2% and 5.4% in patients with and without MDRB, respectively (p = 0.01). After adjusting for sex, age, bone involvement, severe infection, ischemia, diabetes duration, and glycosylated hemoglobin, MDRB showed no association with the primary outcome (RR 3.29; 95% CI, 0.77-13.9), but did with hospitalization longer than 14 days (RR 1.43; 95% CI, 1.04-1.98).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found no association between MDRB and increased mortality and/or major amputation due to DFI complications, but did find a correlation with prolonged hospitalization. The high proportion of MDRB could limit the demonstration of the relationship. It is urgent to apply continuous evaluation of bacterial resistance, implement a rational plan for antibiotic use, and maintain biosafety to confront this threat.

Microbiological Species and Antibiotic Resistance in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Lower Extremity Wounds: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study

Severe lower extremity wounds have an increased risk of complications and limb loss. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the microbiological profile and antibiotic resistance of wounds in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. A cross-sectional comparative study was carried out at a public hospital including 111 patients with moderate to severe wound infections. Tissue samples were collected during a surgical procedure. One hundred and four patients (94%) had positive cultures and 88 (79%) had a Gram-negative microorganism. Among the 185 cultured microorganisms, 133 (72%) were Gram-negative species. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (23 cases) was the most isolated Gram-negative species, and Enterococcus faecalis (26 cases) was the most prevalent Gram-positive species. Among 185 isolated species, 45 (24%) were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers, 23 (12%) were carbapenem-resistant, and 5 (3%) were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Findings revealed that there was no significant difference in the microbiological profile and antibiotic resistance among patients with lower extremity wounds whether they were diabetic or nondiabetic.

Prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in diabetic foot ulcers: A meta-analysis

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections have become increasingly common in recent years due to the increased prevalence of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). We carried out a meta-analysis aimed at investigating the prevalence of MDR bacteria isolated from DFUs and analysing the risk factors for MDR bacterial infection in patients with DFUs. The PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Ovid, Scopus, and ProQuest databases were searched for studies published up to November 2023 on the clinical outcomes of MDR bacteria in DFUs. The main outcome was the prevalence of MDR bacteria in DFUs. A total of 21 studies were included, representing 4885 patients from which 2633 MDR bacterial isolates were obtained. The prevalence of MDR bacteria in DFUs was 50.86% (95% confidence interval (CI): 41.92%-59.78%). The prevalence of MDR gram-positive bacteria (GPB) in DFUs was 19.81% (95% CI: 14.35%-25.91%), and the prevalence of MDR gram-negative bacteria (GNB) in DFUs was 32.84% (95% CI: 26.40%-39.62%). MDR Staphylococcus aureus (12.13% (95% CI: 8.79%-15.91%)) and MDR Enterococcus spp. (3.33% (95% CI: 1.92%-5.07%)) were the main MDR-GPB in DFUs. MDR Escherichia coli, MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa, MDR Enterobacter spp., MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae, and MDR Proteus mirabilis were the main MDR-GNB in DFUs. The prevalence rates were 6.93% (95% CI: 5.15%-8.95%), 6.01% (95% CI: 4.03%-8.33%), 3.59% (95% CI: 0.42%-9.30%), 3.50% (95% CI: 2.31%-4.91%), and 3.27% (95% CI: 1.74%-5.21%), respectively. The clinical variables of diabetic foot ulcer patients infected with MDR bacteria and non-MDR bacteria in the included studies were analysed. The results showed that peripheral vascular disease, peripheral neuropathy, nephropathy, osteomyelitis, Wagner's grade, previous hospitalization and previous use of antibacterial drugs were significantly different between the MDR bacterial group and the non-MDR bacterial group. We concluded that there is a high prevalence of MDR bacterial infections in DFUs. The prevalence of MDR-GNB was greater than that of MDR-GPB in DFUs. MDR S. aureus was the main MDR-GPB in DFUs, and MDR E. coli was the main MDR-GNB in DFUs. Our study also indicated that peripheral vascular disease, peripheral neuropathy, nephropathy, osteomyelitis, Wagner's grade, previous hospitalization, and previous use of antibacterial drugs were associated with MDR bacterial infections in patients with DFUs.

A COVID-19 Silver Lining-Decline in Antibiotic Resistance in Ischemic Leg Ulcers during the Pandemic: A 6-Year Retrospective Study from a Regional Tertiary Hospital (2017-2022)

Antibiotic resistance (AR) associated with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) poses additional challenges for the management of ischemic leg ulcers, increasing the likelihood of severe outcomes. This study assessed AR prevalence in bacteria isolated from CLTI-associated leg ulcers before (1 January 2017-10 March 2020; n = 69) and during (11 March 2020-31 December 2022; n = 59) the COVID-19 pandemic from patients admitted with positive wound cultures to a regional hospital in Chiang Mai (Thailand). There was a marked reduction in AR rates from 78% pre-pandemic to 42% during the pandemic (p < 0.0001), with rates of polymicrobial infections 22 percentage points lower (from 61% to 39%, respectively; p = 0.014). There were reduced AR rates to amoxicillin/clavulanate (from 42% to 4%; p < 0.0001) and ampicillin (from 16% to 2%; p = 0.017), as well as multidrug resistance (19% to 8%; p = 0.026). Factors associated with increased AR odds were polymicrobial infections (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 5.6 (95% CI 2.1, 15.0); p = 0.001), gram-negative bacteria (aOR 7.0 (95% CI 2.4, 20.5); p < 0.001), and prior use of antibiotics (aOR 11.9 (95% CI 1.1, 128.2); p = 0.041). Improvements in infection control measures and hygiene practices in the community during the pandemic were likely key factors contributing to lower AR rates. Thus, strategic public health interventions, including community education on hygiene and the informed use of antibiotics, may be crucial in mitigating the challenges posed by AR in CLTI. Further, advocating for more judicious use of empirical antibiotics in clinical settings can balance effective treatment against AR development, thereby improving patient outcomes.

Increase in antibiotic resistance in diabetic foot infections among peruvian patients: a single-center cross-sectional study

Background

Diabetic foot is one of the most significant complications in individuals with diabetes and is closely associated with lower limb amputation. The antibiotic susceptibility patterns of these bacterial isolates play a critical role in guiding effective treatment strategies We aimed to determine the most common bacterial agents causing diabetic foot infections in a tertiary-care hospital in Peru.

Methods

Clinical and microbiological data were collected from 181 patients diagnosed with diabetic foot infections and positive microbiological culture results. All the samples were analyzed with the Vitek 2 compact system and the cut-off points were defined with the CLSI M100 guide. The data were segregated based on mono-microbial or poly-microbial cultures, bacterial types, and antibiotic susceptibility profiles.

Results

A total of 32 bacterial species were identified, predominantly Gram-negative (63%). The most frequent bacterial agents isolated were Staphylococcus aureus (19.9%), Escherichia coli (12.2%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8.3%), and Proteus vulgaris (6.6%). These bacteria commonly exhibited resistance to Ampicillin, Ciprofloxacin, Levofloxacin, Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and Cefuroxime. E. coli showed the highest antibiotic resistance (19 antibiotics), while Gentamicin, Tobramycin, and Levofloxacin demonstrated the highest sensitivity against the most prevalent bacteria. Gram-negative bacteria also exhibited notable antibiotic-susceptibility to Meropenem, Piperacillin/tazobactam, and Amikacin. Regarding the presence of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase, 54 isolates tested positive, with 35 (64.8%) and 14 (42.4%) of these being S. aureus and E. coli.

Conclusions

Bacterial agents causing diabetic foot infections pose a constant concern, particularly due to the increasing antibiotic resistance observed. This difficulty in treating the condition contributes to a higher risk of amputation and mortality. Further research on bacterial susceptibility is necessary to determine appropriate dosages for pharmacological treatment and to prevent the overuse of antibiotics.

Distribution of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in diabetic foot ulcers and risk factors for drug resistance: a retrospective analysis

Objective

To investigate the distribution, drug resistance and risk factors of multi-drug resistant bacterias (MDROs) in patients with Type 2 diabetic foot ulcers (DFU).

Method

The clinical data, foot secretions, pathogenic microorganisms and drug sensitivity tests of 147 patients with type 2 diabetes admitted to our department from January 2018 to December 2021 were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had been infected with MDROs or not. Seventy-one cases were infected with MDROs as the case group, and the remaining 76 cases were the control group. Chi-square test and t-test were used to analyze the results of MDROs infection and DFU, and logistic multivariate regression was used to evaluate the risk factors of MDROs infection.

Results

A total of 71 strains were isolated from the MDROs-positive group, with the top three being Staphylococcus aureus (46.48%), Escherichia coli (22.53%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18.31%), respectively. Logistic multifactorial regression analysis showed that history of previous antimicrobial exposure, neuroischemic wound, Wagner grade 3-5, and combined osteomyelitis were associated with Type 2 diabetic foot infection MDROs (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Previous history of antimicrobial exposure, neuroischemic wounds, Wagner grade 3-5, and combined osteomyelitis are independent risk factors for MDROs, which can identify the risk factors for MDROs at an early stage and help to identify people at high risk of MDROs infection and take relevant comprehensive treatment in time to slow down the development of the disease.

Antibacterial effects of single phage and phage cocktail against multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from diabetic foot ulcer

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is associated with long-term hospitalization and amputation. Antibiotic resistance has made the infection eradication more difficult. Hence, seeking alternative therapies such as phage therapy seems necessary. Bacteriophages are viruses targeting specific bacterial species. Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) is among causative agents of the DFU. In this study, the therapeutic effects of single phage and phage cocktail were investigated against multidrug-resistant (MDR) K. pneumonia isolated from DFU. Bacteriophages were isolated from animal feces and sewage samples, and were enriched and propagated using K. pneumoniae as the host. Thirty K. pneumoniae clinical isolates were collected from hospitalized patients with DFU. The antibiotic susceptibility pattern was determined using agar disk diffusion test. The phages' morphological traits were determined using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The killing effect of isolated phages was assessed using plaque assay. Four phage types were isolated and recognized including KP1, KP2, KP3, and KP4. The bacterial rapid regrowth was observed following each single phage-host interaction, but not phage cocktail due to the evolution of mutant strains. Phage cocktail demonstrated significantly higher antibacterial activity than each single phage (p < 0.05) without any bacterial regrowth. The employment of phage cocktail was promising for the eradication of MDR-K. pneumoniae isolates. The development of phage therapy in particular, phage cocktail is promising as an efficient approach to eradicate MDR-K. pneumoniae isolated from DFU. The application of a specific phage cocktail can be investigated to try and achieve the eradication of various infections.

Diabetic Foot Ulcer in India: Aetiological Trends and Bacterial Diversity

Diabetes is one of the most prevalent epidemic metabolic disorders, responsible for a significant amount of physical, psychological and economic loss in human society. Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the extreme pathophysiological consequences of diabetes. Bacterial infection is the most important cause of chronic DFU. Bacterial species or their biofilms show multidrug resistance, which complicates DFU and consequently leads to amputation of the infected part. Since the Indian population comprises diverse ethnic and cultural groups, this could influence the aetiology of diabetic foot infections and bacterial diversity. We reviewed 56 articles published from 2005 to 2022 on the microbiology of DFU and extracted the data on study location, number of patients analysed in the study, pathophysiological complications, age of the patients, sex of the patient, type of bacteria, type of infection (mono or polymicrobial), predominant bacteria (Gram-positive or Gram-negative), predominant isolates and multiple drug resistance (tested or not). We analysed data and described aetiological trends in diabetic foot infections and bacterial diversity. The study revealed that Gram-negative bacteria are predominant as compared to Gram-positive bacteria in individuals with diabetes with DFU in India. Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella sp. and Proteus sp. were the most predominant Gram-negative bacteria, while Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus sp. were the major Gram-positive bacteria in DFU. We discuss bacterial infections in DFU in the context of bacterial diversity, sampling methods, demography and aetiology.

Bacterial Diversity and Antibiotic Resistance in Patients with Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

This study analysed the bacterial diversity, antibiotic susceptibility, and resistance in patients with complications of diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). A retrospective observational study was carried out between September 2019 and September 2022 and involved 215 outpatients with a diagnosis of DFO at a specialized diabetic foot unit. A total of 204 positive bone cultures were isolated, including 62.7% monomicrobial cultures, and 37.3% were formed with at least two microorganisms. We observed that Proteus spp., Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Corynebacterium were the most frequently isolated microorganisms and accounted for more than 10% of the DFO cases. With stratification by Gram-positive (GP) and Gram-negative (GN) bacteria, we observed that 91.6% of cultures presented at least one GP bacteria species, and 50.4% presented at least one GN bacteria species. The most common GP species were CoNS (29%), S. aureus (25.8%), and Corynebacterium spp. (14%). The most frequent GN species consisted of Proteus spp. (32%), P. aeruginosa (23.3%), and E. coli (17.5%). The main antibiotics with resistance to GP-dominated infections were penicillins without β-lactamase inhibitor, and those in GN-dominated infections were sulfonamides and penicillins without β-lactamase. Significant differences were not observed in mean healing time in DFU with acute osteomyelitis (12.76 weeks (4.50;18)) compared to chronic osteomyelitis (15.31 weeks (7;18.25); p = 0.101) and when comparing cases with soft tissue infection (15.95 (6;20)) and those without such an infection (16.59 (7.25;19.75), p = 0.618). This study shows that when treatment of DFO is based on early surgical treatment, the type of DFO and the presence of soft infection are not associated with different or worse prognoses.

Role of bone biopsy and deep tissue culture for antibiotic stewardship in diabetic foot osteomyelitis

OBJECTIVES

To describe organisms most frequently identified on bone biopsy or deep tissue culture and determine how culture data impacted antibiotic management in patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients admitted with a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) between 3 March 2018 and 31 December 2019 and selected for patients diagnosed with infectious osteomyelitis (OM) of the lower extremity. We stratified patients by whether a bone biopsy or deep tissue culture was obtained and compared rates of antibiotic utilization with chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

Of 305 patients with a DFU, 152 (50%) were clinically diagnosed with DFO. Forty-seven patients received 41 deep tissue cultures and 29 bone biopsy cultures for a total of 70 cultures. Of 45 (64%) positive cultures, 36 (80%) had Gram-positive organisms and 19 (42%) had Gram-negative organisms. MDR organisms were isolated in 7 (15%) patients. Culture data resulted in antibiotic changes in 41 (87%) patients. Therapy was narrowed in 29 (62%) patients and broadened due to inadequate empirical coverage in 4 (9%) patients. Culture data from 18 (40%) patients showed susceptibility to an oral treatment regimen with high bioavailability. There was no significant difference in rates of antibiotic utilization at discharge between patients who underwent bone biopsy or deep tissue culture relative to those who did not (77% versus 75%, P = 0.86), although less MRSA coverage was used (34% versus 50%, P = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with DFO, deep tissue and bone biopsy cultures were infrequently obtained but resulted in targeted therapy changes in most patients. Culture data usually allowed for narrowing of antibiotics but revealed inadequate empirical coverage in a subset of patients.

Diabetic Foot Infection Characteristics and Antibiotics Susceptibility Patterns in a Regional Hospital in Libya

Introduction Diabetes is a major global health problem, among the top causes of death worldwide. Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is associated with an increased risk of amputation by 155 times and a mortality rate of 57% at 5 years. This study aims to characterize DFI epidemiology in a local hospital and analyze local microbiological patterns and antibiotic susceptibility testing.

Patients and Methods This is a retrospective review of Al Jala hospital Benghazi/Libya medical records. Eligible patients were included, if they had DFI with confirmed tissue/pus samples collections was submitted to the hospital laboratory for microbiology and Antibiotics susceptibility analysis.

Results Out of 126 patients, 77 (61.1%) were men, and 49 (38.9%) were women. The mean age was 55.4 years. Incision drainage with debridement was the most common surgical procedure (77.1%). 38.88% of growth was polymicrobial. Gram-negative rods were isolated in 70.9%, and gram-positive cocci in 27.4%. The most commonly isolated bacteria were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15.9%) and Proteus sps. (14.2%), Staphylococcus aureus (11.3%), and Escherichia coli (10.2%). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) constitutes 30% of isolated S. aureus. The most common effective antibiotic for P. aeruginosa was imipenem (90%), for S. aureus was linezolid (100%), and for MRSA was linezolid, vancomycin (100%), and ciprofloxacin 88.8%. Sixty-four percent of total bacterial isolates were MDROs (gram-positive isolates 65.3%, gram-negative isolates 63.6%).

Conclusions The emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria is a global health concern. This study attempts to evaluate the local microbiology and antimicrobial susceptibility to tailor the treatment choice for better patient outcomes.

An Overview of Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Associated Problems with Special Emphasis on Treatments with Antimicrobials

One of the most significant challenges of diabetes health care is diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). DFUs are more challenging to cure, and this is particularly true for people who already have a compromised immune system. Pathogenic bacteria and fungi are becoming more resistant to antibiotics, so they may be unable to fight microbial infections at the wound site with the antibiotics we have now. This article discusses the dressings, topical antibacterial treatment, medications and debridement techniques used for DFU and provides a deep discussion of DFU and its associated problems. English-language publications on DFU were gathered from many different databases, such as Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, Springer Nature, and Google Scholar. For the treatment of DFU, a multidisciplinary approach involving the use of diagnostic equipment, skills, and experience is required. Preventing amputations starts with patient education and the implementation of new categorization systems. The microbiota involved in DFU can be better understood using novel diagnostic techniques, such as the 16S-ribosomal DNA sequence in bacteria. This could be achieved by using new biological and molecular treatments that have been shown to help prevent infections, to control local inflammation, and to improve the healing process.

Screening of Natural Molecules as Adjuvants to Topical Antibiotics to Treat Staphylococcus aureus from Diabetic Foot Ulcer Infections

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a common result of a complex secondary complication of diabetes mellitus. More than half of DFUs become infected due to frequent colonization with Staphylococcus aureus. The use of topical antibiotics is proposed, especially in combination with natural adjuvants, to minimize the negative impacts caused by generalized use of systemic antibiotics. In this study, 13 different phytochemicals—namely chalcone, juglone, cinnamic acid, trigonelline, Furvina—and four nitrovinylfuran derivatives—guaiazulene, α-bisabolol, farnesol and nerolidol—were selected to be tested as antibiotic enhancers. After minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentration (MIC and MBC) determination of each molecule against different strains of S. aureus, including clinical isolates from diabetic foot wounds (CECT 976, Xu212, SA 1199B, RN4220, MJMC102, MJMC109, MJMC110 and MJMC111), their potentiation effects on the antibiotics fusidic acid, mupirocin, gentamicin, oxacillin and methicillin were evaluated through the disc diffusion method. Farnesol at sub-MIC was able to restore the activity of methicillin and oxacillin on the MJMC102 and MJMC111 strains, as well as two MRSA clinical isolates, and potentiated the effect of the remaining antibiotics. The results obtained demonstrate the great potential for the topical application of phytochemicals and derivatives as antibiotic resistance modifier agents to combat multidrug resistance in bacterial wound infections.

Diabetic foot ulcer, antimicrobial remedies and emerging strategies for the treatment

According to the International Diabetes Federation's 2015 study, diabetes affects over 415 million people globally (5 million of whom die each year), and the incidence of diabetes is expected to climb to over 640 million (1 in 10) by 2040. (IDF 2015). Diabetes foot ulcers (DFU) are one of the most significant diabetic health consequences. Antimicrobial treatments, such as dressings, topical therapies, medicines, drugs, debridement procedures, molecular, cellular, and gene therapies, plant extracts, antimicrobial peptides, growth factors, devices, ozone, and energy-based therapies, would be the focus of this study. Scopus, Web of Science, Bentham Science, Science Direct, and Google Scholar were among the sources used to compile the English-language publications on DFU. DFU treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach that includes the use of proper diagnostic tools, competence, and experience. To prevent amputations, this starts with patient education and the use of new categories to steer treatment. New diagnostic methods, such as the 16S ribosomal DNA sequence in bacteria, should become available to acquire a better knowledge of the microbiota in DFUs. 

Risk Factors for Multidrug-Resistant Organisms Infection in Diabetic Foot Ulcer

Objective

The aim of this study is to analyze the microbiological characteristics of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) and drug resistance of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) and to reveal the potential risk factors for MDROs. This provides a basis for early empiric antibiotic treatment.

Methods

This study included 348 patients with diabetic foot ulcer in Chu Hsien-I Memorial Hospital & Metabolic Disease Hospital of Tianjin Medical University between May 2020 and November 2021. A total of 475 strains of bacteria were cultured, among which 240 strains were multidrug-resistant bacteria, accounting for 51%. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze risk factors. First, univariate analysis was used to calculate the p value of variables, and then multivariate analysis was conducted for variables with p < 0.1 to analyze independent risk factors. Risk factors with p < 0.05 in multivariable analysis were considered as independent risk factors. The strength of the association was represented by odds ratio and 95% confidence interval.

Results

Univariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that previous hospitalization, previous antibiotic therapy, ulcer size >4cm², surgical therapy, D-dimer, and CRP were associated with MDRO infection in patients with DFU. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that previous hospitalization (OR = 1.91; 95% CI = 1.11–3.28; p = 0.02), ulcer size >4cm² (OR = 1.68; 95% CI = 1.03–2.76; p = 0.04), surgical therapy (OR = 2.14; 95% CI = 1.03–4.47; p = 0.04), and CRP (OR = 1.01; 95% CI = 1.00–1.01; p = 0.03) were independent risk factors for MDROs infection in diabetic foot patients. Drug resistance analysis may indicate that the proportion and drug resistance rate of Acinetobacter baumannii in Tianjin, China, have changed.

Conclusion

Previous hospitalization, ulcer size >4cm², surgical therapy and CRP were independent risk factors for MDROs infection in diabetic foot patients. Identifying these risk factors can help us identify the high-risk patients of diabetic foot with MDRO infection early. More attention to high-risk patients and more aggressive isolation precautions may reduce the incidence of MDRO infection in diabetic foot patients.

Diabetic Foot Ulcer Infections and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Production During the COVID-19 Pandemic

During the different waves of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, there has been an increased incidence of diabetes mellitus and diabetic foot infections. Among gram-negative bacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the predominant causative agent for diabetic foot ulcer infections in low-resource countries. P. aeruginosa possesses a variety of virulence factors, including biofilm formation. Biofilm formation is an important benchmark characteristic in the pathophysiology of diabetic foot ulceration. The main objective of the current study was to identify the most commonly isolated organisms and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns in diabetic foot patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. We also determined the genes associated with bacterial persistence and biofilm formation in the predominantly isolated organism. Accordingly, 100 wound swab samples were collected from diabetic foot patients from different hospitals in Alexandria, Egypt. Through phenotypic detection of biofilm formation, 93% (40) of the 43 P. aeruginosa isolates examined were categorized as biofilm producers. Molecular detection of the biofilm-encoding genes among the 43 P. aeruginosa isolates was as follows: algD (100%), pelF (88%) and pslD (49.7%), and this highlights a need for biofilm formation inhibitors to prevent the persistence of bacterial pathogens, and thus achieve better clinical outcomes in diabetic foot ulcer infections.