Clinical Update Findings about pH-Impedance Monitoring Features in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients

Link between pharyngeal acid reflux episodes and the effectiveness of proton pump inhibitor therapy

BACKGROUND

Diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is challenging due to overlapping symptoms. While proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly prescribed, reliable predictors of their responsiveness are unclear. Reflux monitoring technologies like dual potential of hydrogen (pH) sensors and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) could improve diagnosis. Research suggests that a composite pH parameter, defined by ≥ 2 pharyngeal acid reflux (PAR) episodes and/or excessive esophageal acid reflux (EAR), predicts PPI efficacy. The criteria for PAR episodes, a pharyngeal pH drop of ≥ 2 units to < 5 within 30 seconds during esophageal acidification, showed strong interobserver reliability. We hypothesized that PAR episodes alone might also predict PPI responsiveness.

AIM

To investigate whether PAR episodes alone predict a positive response to PPI therapy.

METHODS

Patients suspected of having LPR were prospectively recruited from otolaryngologic clinics in three Taiwanese tertiary centers. They underwent a 24-hour esophagopharyngeal pH test using either 3-pH-sensor or hypopharyngeal MII-pH catheters while off medication, followed by a 12-week esomeprazole course (40 mg twice daily). Participants were categorized into four groups based on pH results: PAR alone, EAR alone, both pH (+), and both pH (-). The primary outcome was a ≥ 50% reduction in primary laryngeal symptoms, with observers blinded to group assignments.

RESULTS

A total of 522 patients (mean age 52.3 ± 12.8 years, 54% male) were recruited. Of these, 190 (mean age 51.5 ± 12.4 years, 61% male) completed the treatment, and 89 (47%) responded to PPI therapy. Response rates were highest in the PAR alone group (73%, n = 11), followed by EAR alone (59%, n = 68), both pH (+) (56%, n = 18), and both pH (-) (33%, n = 93). Multivariate analysis adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and endoscopic esophagitis showed that participants with PAR alone, EAR alone, and both pH (+) were 7.4-fold (P = 0.008), 4.2-fold (P = 0.0002), and 3.4-fold (P = 0.03) more likely to respond to PPI therapy, respectively, compared to the both pH (-) group. Secondary analyses using the definition of ≥ 1 PAR episode were less robust.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of proven hypopharyngeal predictors, this post-hoc analysis found that baseline ≥ 2 PAR episodes alone are linked to PPI responsiveness, suggesting the importance of hypopharyngeal reflux monitoring.

European clinical practice guideline: managing and treating laryngopharyngeal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

To propose a European consensus for managing and treating laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) to guide primary care and specialist physicians.

METHODS

Twenty-three European experts (otolaryngologists, gastroenterologists, surgeons) participated in a modified Delphi process to revise 38 statements about the definition, clinical management, and treatment of LPRD. Three voting rounds were conducted on a 5-point scale and a consensus was defined a priori as agreement by 80% of the experts.

RESULTS

After the third round, 36 statements composed the first European Consensus Report on the definition, diagnosis, and treatment of LPRD. The hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring is the gold standard for diagnosing LPRD (> 1 pharyngeal reflux event) and treating the LPRD with personalized therapy. The empirical treatment needs to be based on diet, stress reduction, and alginates or antiacids to address the acidic and alkaline reflux events. Proton pump inhibitors are kept for patients with acidic LPRD and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) findings. The treatment needs to be as short as possible (minimum two months). The medication can be progressively reduced for patients with relief of symptoms. Changing medication class can be considered for refractory LPRD rather than an increase in drug doses.

CONCLUSION

A consensus endorsed by the Confederation of European Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Societies is presented to improve the management and treatment of LPRD. The approved statements could improve collaborative research through the adoption of common management approaches to LPRD.

Association between laryngopharyngeal reflux clinical scores and esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring interpretation according to Lyon Consensus 2.0

Laryngopharyngeal reflux remains a diagnostic challenge due to the lack of a definitive diagnostic tool. Esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) pH monitoring has been proven reliable for detecting gastric reflux. This study aims to evaluate the association between clinical scores and MII/pH monitoring according to the Lyon Consensus 2.0. Patients with laryngo-pharyngeal symptoms (LPS) who had a reflux symptom index (RSI) ≥13 or reflux finding score (RFS) ≥7 underwent MII/pH monitoring. The findings were analyzed in comparison with clinical scores. A total of 100 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were recruited for this study. MII/pH monitoring revealed a median acid exposure time (AET) of 1.9% (interquartile range [IQR] = 0.2, 4.9), with 22% of patients recording an AET above 6%. The median number of reflux episodes was 29.5 episodes per day (IQR = 19.0, 43.8), with 7% experiencing more than 80 episodes per day. Gas reflux was identified as the most prevalent type. Based on the Lyon Consensus 2.0, 25 patients exhibited conclusive pathological reflux, while 75 patients showed no conclusive evidence of pathological reflux. No significant differences were found in RSI and RFS between these groups. Only gas reflux episodes showed a significant correlation with RSI (r = 0.255, P = 0.011). RSI and RFS among patients with LPS showed no statistically significant differences in identifying pathological reflux or no conclusive evidence of pathological reflux. This finding suggests that the pathophysiology underlying LPS may not be solely attributable to reflux.

Advances in laryngopharyngeal reflux: Etiology, diagnosis, and management

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) manifests as a variety of nonspecific upper aerodigestive tract symptoms. Rather than a single disorder, LPR may be conceived of as a spectrum of subtypes with varying clinical presentations. LPR signs and symptoms arise from the direct and/or indirect effects of refluxate, physical and molecular injury of the mucosa, and neurologic responses to esophageal events. Specific constituents of refluxate exert distinct mucosal responses and immediate or delayed effects resulting in transient or persistent symptoms and/or laryngeal hypersensitivity. While the complex etiology of LPR presents challenges to its diagnosis and management, tools that aid the identification of LPR subtypes can provide insight into treatment decision-making. Hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring provides detailed analysis of reflux events, enabling the development of individualized treatment plans, yet cost and availability limit its widespread use. Alginates offer temporary symptom relief and antireflux surgery may provide benefit when symptoms are recalcitrant to other approaches. Pepsin inhibitors hold promise as a medical therapy when surgery is not an option. Laryngeal hypersensitivity should be considered as part of a comprehensive therapeutic approach. Promising medical and scientific research continues to yield new insights into the complex etiology of LPR and novel strategies for its diagnosis and management.

The reflux symptom score has good screening value for laryngopharyngeal reflux

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the consistency between the reflux symptom score (RSS) and the multitemporal salivary pepsin test in screening for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and the screening value of the RSS for LPR by simultaneously administering daytime multitemporal salivary pepsin test and RSS to patients.

METHODS

This was a single-center prospective observational study. All included patients underwent simultaneous daytime multitemporal salivary pepsin testing and RSS. A participant was considered to have LPR when one or more positive salivary pepsin test results or RSS score > 13 were obtained. The consistency between the multitemporal salivary pepsin test and the RSS was compared by the weighted Cohen's kappa statistic. The screening value of the RSS for LPR was investigated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients were included. The positivity rate of LPR was 71.64% according to the results of the multitemporal salivary pepsin test. According to RSS, the positive rate of LPR was 70.15%. The weighted Kappa value between the multitemporal salivary pepsin test and the RSS was 0.675 (p < 0.001). The area under curve of RSS screening for LPR was 0.843 (p < 0.01), and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of RSS screening for LPR were 89.58%, 78.95%, 91.49%, and 75%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There is a good consistency between the RSS and the multitemporal salivary pepsin test, and the RSS has a good screening value for LPR, which can be applied to screen for LPR in otolaryngologic patients.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, and Management: A Narrative Review

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a common and often misinterpreted clinical entity responsible for various symptoms affecting the upper aerodigestive tract. This narrative literature review aims to review the pathophysiology, symptoms, and management of LPR, emphasizing the emerging understanding of gastric content reflux in aerodigestive tissue irritation. Understanding the pathophysiology of LPR will allow general practitioners and specialists to accurately recognize and treat a condition that causes substantial morbidity in the affected patients. Using evidence-based findings from randomized controlled trials, clinical studies, and meta-analyses, the present investigation aims to outline and unify previous research into LPR. A review of anatomical structures, pathogenic mechanisms, endoscopic findings in LPR, and clinical manifestations and treatment options are also discussed. Though controversy around the diagnosis and management of LPR persists, emerging research in cellular damage and diagnostic tools promises to provide increasingly accurate and reliable modalities for characterizing LPR. Hopefully, future research will unify the field and provide overarching guidelines for both primary care and specialists. The present investigation provides an integrated perspective on LPR, a clinically prevalent and complex disease.

The Dubai Definition and Diagnostic Criteria of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: The IFOS Consensus

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this work was to gather an international consensus group to propose a global definition and diagnostic approach of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) to guide primary care and specialist physicians in the management of LPR.

METHODS

Forty-eight international experts (otolaryngologists, gastroenterologists, surgeons, and physiologists) were included in a modified Delphi process to revise 48 statements about definition, clinical presentation, and diagnostic approaches to LPR. Three voting rounds determined a consensus statement to be acceptable when 80% of experts agreed with a rating of at least 8/10. Votes were anonymous and the analyses of voting rounds were performed by an independent statistician.

RESULTS

After the third round, 79.2% of statements (N = 38/48) were approved. LPR was defined as a disease of the upper aerodigestive tract resulting from the direct and/or indirect effects of gastroduodenal content reflux, inducing morphological and/or neurological changes in the upper aerodigestive tract. LPR is associated with recognized non-specific laryngeal and extra-laryngeal symptoms and signs that can be evaluated with validated patient-reported outcome questionnaires and clinical instruments. The hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH testing can suggest the diagnosis of LPR when there is >1 acid, weakly acid or nonacid hypopharyngeal reflux event in 24 h.

CONCLUSION

A global consensus definition for LPR is presented to improve detection and diagnosis of the disease for otolaryngologists, pulmonologists, gastroenterologists, surgeons, and primary care practitioners. The approved statements are offered to improve collaborative research by adopting common and validated diagnostic approaches to LPR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5 Laryngoscope, 134:1614-1624, 2024.

Continued PPI use and gastrointestinal evaluations after a negative pH study in patients with throat symptoms from possible extraesophageal GERD

Background

Recent guidelines have advocated for upfront pH testing in patients with isolated symptoms of extra-esophageal gastrointestinal reflux disease (EE-GERD) under the assumption that a negative pH study will prevent further gastrointestinal (GI) investigations, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, and reduce cost. We sought to evaluate if this actually occurs.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed on patients who underwent 24-hour combined pH-impedance testing off PPI for suspected EE-GERD. A negative study was defined as DeMeester score <14.7.

Results

59 patients were included (mean age 53.2; 50.8% women). Most (38, 64.4%) had a negative study. Findings of laryngopharyngoreflux on laryngoscopy did not predict pH results. Those with a negative study had the same number of followup GI appointments, repeat endoscopies, and repeat pH studies compared to those with a positive study (p=NS). While PPIs were more frequently stopped in those with a negative pH study, still 14 (36.8%) were continued on a PPI. At the end of the follow-up period (mean 43.6 months), 18 (47.4%) subjects with a negative pH study were still prescribed PPIs. Patients who were diagnosed with post-nasal drip or rhinits were significantly less likely to still be receiving a PPI (5.6% vs 35.0%, p=0.045).

Conclusions

Despite a negative pH study, a substantial number of patients with isolated EE-GERD symptoms are continued on a PPI and they undergo GI follow-up at the same rate as those with a positive study. These findings bring into question the recent recommendations for upfront pH testing in suspected EE-GERD and its reported cost savings.

A Study of the Diagnostic Value of the Sign and Symptom Questionnaires for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the diagnostic value of symptom questionnaires, sign questionnaires, and the combination of 2 questionnaires for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, single-centered.

SETTING

Seventy-seven patients who were hospitalized in the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery from October 2022 to April 2023 were included.

METHODS

Included patients completed the RSS, RSI, RSA, and RFS questionnaires and underwent 24-hour hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (HEMII-pH). The RSS, RSI, RSA, RFS, RSS+RSA, RSS+RFS, RSI+RSA, RSI+RFS, and RSI+RFS diagnostic value were compared using Cohen's k test and receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

Based on the 24 hours HEMII-pH results, 52 patients had LPRD, and 25 patients did not have LPRD. The Kappa values of RSS, RSI, RSA, RFS, RSS+RSA,2 RSS+RFS, RSI+RSA, and RSI+RFS with the 24 hours HEMII-pH monitoring results were 0.565, 0.442, 0.318, 0.431, 0.517, 0.631, 0.451, and 0.461, respectively. The RSS+RFS questionnaire had the highest AUC of 0.836 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.762-0.909) and the RSA questionnaire had the lowest AUC (AUC = 0.665, 95% CI 0.560-0.790). The sensitivity of RSS was the highest (98%), the specificities of RSS+RFS and RSI+RFS were the highest (96%), and the specificity of RSS was the lowest (52%). RSS+RFS had a sensitivity of 75%, second only to RSS and RFS (76%).

CONCLUSION

Among the 8 methods, the RSS combined with the RFS had the highest concordance with 24 hours HEMII-pH monitoring results and AUC values when screening for LPRD.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Benign Vocal Fold Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

There is a link between laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and the formation of benign vocal fold lesions (BVFLs). However, previous studies have mainly focused on LPR suggested by symptoms and signs, rather than objectively diagnosed LPR via pharyngeal pH monitoring. We, therefore, conducted a Meta-analysis to evaluate the association between pharyngeal pH monitoring diagnosed LPR and the odds of BVFLs.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant observational studies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science.

REVIEW METHODS

We evaluated between-study heterogeneity using the Cochrane Q test and estimated the I2 statistic. Random-effects models were used when significant heterogeneity was observed; otherwise, fixed-effects models were used.

RESULTS

Thirteen datasets from 9 studies were included. Among them, 493 were diagnosed with LPR and 344 had BVFLs. LPR was related to a higher odds of BVFLs (odds ratio: 3.26, 95% confidence interval: 1.84-5.76, P < .001) with moderate heterogeneity (P for Cochrane Q test = .006, I2  = 57%). Subgroup analyses showed that the association was similar in studies with only pharyngeal pH monitoring (Restech), with double-probe or 3-site pH monitoring, and with 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (P for subgroup difference = .15). In addition, subgroup analysis showed consistent results in studies from Asia and Europe (P for subgroup analysis = .12), and the association seemed to be consistent for vocal Reinke's edema, nodules, and polyps (P for subgroup difference = .09).

CONCLUSION

Pharyngeal pH monitoring diagnosed LPR is associated with the formation of BVFLs.

Usefulness of pepsin saliva measurement for the detection of primary burning mouth syndrome related to reflux

OBJECTIVES

To study the diagnostic value of salivary pepsin tests for detecting laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in patients with primary burning mouth syndrome (BMS).

METHODS

Patients with BMS and asymptomatic individuals were consecutively recruited from September 2018 to June 2023. Patients underwent hypopharyngeal-esophageal impedance pH-monitoring (HEMII-pH) and saliva collections to measure pepsin. Stomatology evaluation was carried out to exclude other causes of BMS. Oral, pharyngeal and laryngeal signs and symptoms were evaluated with Reflux Sign Assessment (RSA) and Reflux Symptom Score (RSS). Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of pepsin test were calculated considering the highest values of pepsin tests at ≥ 16, ≥ 36, and ≥ 100 ng/mL cutoffs. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients with both BMS and LPR at the HEMII-pH and 21 asymptomatic individuals were recruited. Pepsin test was 83.7%, 79.6%, and 71.4% sensitive at cutoffs ≥ 16, ≥ 36, and ≥ 100 ng/mL, respectively. The ROC analysis reported that a threshold of ≥ 21.5 ng/mL was associated with sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 81.6%, 81.0%, 90.1% and 65.4%, respectively. The severity score of burning mouth symptom was significantly associated with the saliva pepsin concentration (rs = 0.263; p = 0.029) and the oral RSA (rs = 0.474; p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Pepsin test is a valuable diagnostic approach for detecting LPR in patients with BMS. Patients with high level of saliva pepsin reported more severe burning mouth symptoms. Future studies are needed to confirm the role of LPR in the primary BMS.

Personalized Treatments Based on Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patient Profiles: A Narrative Review

OBJECTIVE

To review the current findings of the literature on the existence of several profiles of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) patients and to propose personalized diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

METHODS

A state-of-the art review of the literature was conducted using the PubMED, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. The information related to epidemiology, demographics, clinical presentations, diagnostic approaches, and therapeutic responses were extracted to identify outcomes that may influence the clinical and therapeutic courses of LPR.

RESULTS

The clinical presentation and therapeutic courses of LPR may be influenced by gender, age, weight, comorbidities, dietary habits and culture, anxiety, stress, and saliva enzyme profile. The clinical expression of reflux, including laryngopharyngeal, respiratory, nasal, and eye symptoms, and the hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring profile of patients are important issues to improve in patient management. The use of more personalized therapeutic strategies appears to be associated with better symptom relief and cures over the long-term. The role of pepsin in LPR physiology is well-established but the lack of information about the role of other gastrointestinal enzymes in the development of LPR-related mucosa inflammation limits the development of future enzyme-based personalized diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

CONCLUSION

Laryngopharyngeal reflux is a challenging ear, nose, and throat condition associated with poor therapeutic responses and a long-term burden in Western countries. Artificial intelligence should be used for developing personalized therapeutic strategies based on patient features.

Association between oropharyngeal ph-monitoring, pepsin saliva concentration and degree of apnea-hypopnea index of obstructive sleep apnea

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) through oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and pepsin saliva measurements.

DESIGN

Prospective uncontrolled study.

METHODS

Patients with sleep disturbances and reflux symptoms underwent polysomnography, 24-h oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and saliva pepsin collections. The prevalence of LPR was investigated in OSA patients according to oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and pepsin measurements. A correlation analysis was performed between pH-monitoring findings, pepsin saliva levels, reflux symptom score-12 (RSS-12), reflux sign assessment (RSA), Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Pichot and arousal findings.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients completed the evaluations. LPR was detected in 34/37 (92%) and 29/34 (85%) patients at the oropharyngeal-pH monitoring and pepsin test, respectively. OSA was detected in 30 patients (81%). Among them, LPR was detected in 28/30 (93%) cases. Pharyngeal reflux events mainly occurred nighttime/supine in OSA patients. Both Ryan score and supine reflux time at pH < 6.5 were significantly associated with BMI and the RSA sub- and total scores (p < 0.02). Tongue-base hypertrophy score was positively associated with the number of micro-arousals (p = 0.027); the supine percent of pH < 6.5 (p = 0.030); morning (p = 0.030) and bedtime pepsin saliva measurements (p = 0.037). The bedtime pepsin saliva level was significantly associated with Ryan Score (p = 0.047); AHI (p = 0.017) and the sleep saturation < 90% time (p = 0.040). The saliva level of the morning pepsin was associated with a shortest paradoxical sleep phase (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

OSA patients may have high prevalence of pharyngeal reflux events at the oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and high pepsin saliva measurements. Oropharyngeal pH-monitoring should be useful for the correlation between reflux and sleep findings in OSA patients. Future large cohort controlled studies are needed to determine the prevalence of LPR in OSA and healthy individuals.

Is empiric proton pump inhibition in patients with symptoms of extraesophageal gastroesophageal reflux justified?

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has had a marked increase in Western countries with a paralleling interest in extraesophageal (EE) manifestations of GERD, including laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). There are considerable differences in clinical practice between gastroenterologists, otolaryngologists and pulmonologists.

METHODS

In this narrative review we address some of these controversies concerning EE manifestations of GERD and LPR.

RESULTS

It is disputed whether there is causal relationship between reflux and the numerous symptoms and conditions suggested to be EE manifestations of GERD. Similarly, the pathophysiology is uncertain and there are disagreements concerning diagnostic criteria. Consequently, it is challenging to provide evidence-based treatment recommendations. A significant number of patients are given a trial course with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for several months before symptoms are evaluated. In randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses of RCTs PPI treatment does not seem to be advantageous over placebo, and the evidence supporting that patients without verified GERD have any benefit of PPI treatment is negligible. There is a large increase in both over the counter and prescribed PPI use in several countries and a significant proportion of this use is without any symptomatic benefit for the patients. Whereas short-term treatment has few side effects, there is concern about side-effects after long-term use. Although empiric PPI treatment for suspected EE manifestations of GERD instead of prior esophageal 24-hour pH and impedance monitoring is included in several guidelines by various societies, this practice contributes to overtreatment with PPI.

CONCLUSION

We argue that the current knowledge suggests that diagnostic testing with pH and impedance monitoring rather than empiric PPI treatment should be chosen in a higher proportion of patients presenting with symptoms possibly attributable to EE reflux.

Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease Based on Gray and Texture Changes of Laryngoscopic Images

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the changing trends of gray and texture values of laryngoscopic images in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and non-LPR.

METHODS

A total of 3428 laryngoscopic images were selected and divided into two groups, non-LPR and LPR groups based on the reflux symptom index. Gray histogram and gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) were used to quantify gray and texture features, and the model was trained based on these features. The total laryngoscopic images dataset was proportionally split into two parts including the training set and the test set according to the ratio of 7:3. Four different machine learning algorithms, including decision tree, naive Bayes, linear regression, and K-nearest neighbors, were applied to classify non-LPR or LPR laryngoscopic images.

RESULTS

The results showed that different classification algorithms are used to classify laryngoscopic image dataset and promising classification accuracy are obtained. Specifically, the accuracy of K-nearest neighbors was 83.38% for the gray histogram-only classification, that of linear regression was 88.63% for the GLCM-only classification, and that of the decision tree was 98.01% for the combined gray histogram and GLCM analysis.

CONCLUSION

Gray histogram and GLCM analysis of the laryngoscopic images may be used as auxiliary tools to detect laryngopharyngeal mucosal damage in patients with LPR. Measurement of gray and texture feature values is an objective and convenient method, which may serve as a reference baseline for clinicians and have potential clinical usefulness.

Pediatric Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: An Evidence-Based Review

Purpose: Pediatric laryngopharyngeal reflux (P-LPR) is associated with the development of common otolaryngological symptoms and findings. In the present study, the findings about epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes of pediatric population were reviewed. Methods: A PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus literature search was conducted about evidence-based findings in epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes of P-LPR. Findings: The prevalence of LPR remains unknown in infant and child populations. The clinical presentation depends on age. Infants with LPR symptoms commonly have both gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux and related digestive, respiratory and ear, nose and throat symptoms. The GERD prevalence appears to decrease over the growth, and the clinical picture is increasingly associated with LPR symptoms and findings without GERD. The prevalence of LPR and proximal acid and nonacid esophageal reflux events may be high in some prevalent otolaryngological conditions (chronic otitis media, laryngolomalacia and apnea). However, the lack of use of hypopharyngeal–esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring (HEMII-pH) limits the establishment of etiological associations. Proton pump inhibitors are less effective in P-LPR patients compared to GERD populations, which may be related to the high prevalence of weakly or nonacid reflux events. Conclusions: Many gray areas persist in P-LPR and should be not resolved without the establishment of diagnostic criteria (guidelines) based on HEMII-pH. The unavailability of HEMII-pH and the poor acid-suppressive therapeutic response are all issues requiring future investigations. Future controlled studies using HEMII-pH and enzyme measurements in ear, nose or throat fluids may clarify the epidemiology of P-LPR according to age and its association with many otolaryngological conditions.

Post-thyroidectomy voice and swallowing disorders and association with laryngopharyngeal reflux: A scoping review

Objective

Postthyroidectomy voice and swallowing symptoms (PVSS) may occur even in absence of laryngeal nerve injuries, which remains poorly understood. The objective of this review was to investigate the occurrence of PVSS and the potential etiological role of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

Design

Scoping review.

Methods

Three investigators search PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases for studies investigating the relationship between reflux and PVSS. The authors adhered to PRISMA statements and the following outcomes were investigated: age, gender, thyroid features, reflux diagnosis, association outcomes, and treatment outcomes. Based on the study findings and bias analysis, authors proposed recommendations for future studies.

Results

Eleven studies met our inclusion criteria, accounting for 3829 patients (2964 females). Postthyroidectomy swallowing and voice disorders were found in 5.5%-64%; and 16%-42% of patients, respectively. Prospectively, some results suggested an improvement of swallowing/voice disorders postthyroidectomy, whereas others did not observe significant changes. The prevalence of reflux ranged from 16.6% to 25% of subjects who benefited from thyroidectomy. There was an important heterogeneity between studies regarding the profile of included patients, the PVSS outcomes used, the delay of PVSS assessment and reflux diagnosis, making difficult the study comparison. Some recommendations were provided to guide future studies, especially about the reflux diagnosis approach and clinical outcomes.

Conclusion

The potential etiological role of LPR in PVSS is not demonstrated. Future studies are needed to demonstrate an increase of pharyngeal reflux events with objective findings from prethyroidectomy to postthyroidectomy.

Level of Evidence

3a.

Treating and Managing Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease in the Over 65s: Evidence to Date

Purpose

The clinical presentation and therapeutic outcomes of elderly patients may be different from those in younger populations, leading to additional diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties. The present study reviewed the findings on the epidemiology, and clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic outcomes of elderly patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

Methods

A PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus literature search was conducted on the epidemiological, clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic findings of elderly LPR patients.

Findings

The prevalence of LPR in the elderly population remains unknown. From a clinical standpoint, older LPR patients report overall lower symptom scores and related quality-of-life outcomes at the time of the diagnosis. The required treatment time to obtain symptom relief appears to be longer in older compared with younger patients. Particular attention needs to be paid to prolonged medication use because the elderly population is characterized by polypharmacy and there is a higher risk of proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) interactions and adverse events. The plasma clearance of most PPIs is reduced with age, which must be considered by practitioners in the prescription of antireflux therapy.

Conclusion

The clinical presentation and treatment efficacy of elderly LPR patients differ from those in younger patients. Practitioners need to carefully consider the risk of drug interactions and adverse events in elderly patients.