Non-Invasive Assessment of Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics

Advancements in triple-negative breast cancer sub-typing, diagnosis and treatment with assistance of artificial intelligence : a focused review

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is most aggressive type of breast cancer with multiple invasive sub-types and leading cause of women's death worldwide. Lack of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) causes it to spread rapidly making its treatment challenging due to unresponsiveness towards anti-HER and endocrine therapy. Hence, needing advanced therapeutic treatments and strategies in order to get better recovery from TNBC. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been emerged by giving its high inputs in the automated diagnosis as well as treatment of several diseases, particularly TNBC. AI based TNBC molecular sub-typing, diagnosis as well as therapeutic treatment has become successful now days. Therefore, present review has reviewed recent advancements in the role and assistance of AI particularly focusing on molecular sub-typing, diagnosis as well as treatment of TNBC. Meanwhile, advantages, certain limitations and future implications of AI assistance in the TNBC diagnosis and treatment are also discussed in order to fully understand readers regarding this issue.

AI Applications to Breast MRI: Today and Tomorrow

In breast imaging, there is an unrelenting increase in the demand for breast imaging services, partly explained by continuous expanding imaging indications in breast diagnosis and treatment. As the human workforce providing these services is not growing at the same rate, the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in breast imaging has gained significant momentum to maximize workflow efficiency and increase productivity while concurrently improving diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes. Thus far, the implementation of AI in breast imaging is at the most advanced stage with mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis techniques, followed by ultrasound, whereas the implementation of AI in breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not moving along as rapidly due to the complexity of MRI examinations and fewer available dataset. Nevertheless, there is persisting interest in AI-enhanced breast MRI applications, even as the use of and indications of breast MRI continue to expand. This review presents an overview of the basic concepts of AI imaging analysis and subsequently reviews the use cases for AI-enhanced MRI interpretation, that is, breast MRI triaging and lesion detection, lesion classification, prediction of treatment response, risk assessment, and image quality. Finally, it provides an outlook on the barriers and facilitators for the adoption of AI in breast MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 6.

Multiparametric MR-based feature fusion radiomics combined with ADC maps-based tumor proliferative burden in distinguishing TNBC versus non-TNBC

Objective.To investigate the incremental value of quantitative stratified apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) defined tumor habitats for differentiating triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) from non-TNBC on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) based feature-fusion radiomics (RFF) model.Approach.466 breast cancer patients (54 TNBC, 412 non-TNBC) who underwent routine breast MRIs in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Radiomics features were extracted from whole tumor on T2WI, diffusion-weighted imaging, ADC maps and the 2nd phase of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Four models including the RFFmodel (fused features from all MRI sequences), RADCmodel (ADC radiomics feature), StratifiedADCmodel (tumor habitas defined on stratified ADC parameters) and combinational RFF-StratifiedADCmodel were constructed to distinguish TNBC versus non-TNBC. All cases were randomly divided into a training (n= 337) and test set (n= 129). The four competing models were validated using the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy.Main results.Both the RFFand StratifiedADCmodels demonstrated good performance in distinguishing TNBC from non-TNBC, with best AUCs of 0.818 and 0.773 in the training and test sets. StratifiedADCmodel revealed significant different tumor habitats (necrosis/cysts habitat, chaotic habitat or proliferative tumor core) between TNBC and non-TNBC with its top three discriminative parameters (p <0.05). The integrated RFF-StratifiedADCmodel demonstrated superior accuracy over the other three models, with higher AUCs of 0.832 and 0.784 in the training and test set, respectively (p <0.05).Significance.The RFF-StratifiedADCmodel through integrating various tumor habitats' information from whole-tumor ADC maps-based StratifiedADCmodel and radiomics information from mpMRI-based RFFmodel, exhibits tremendous promise for identifying TNBC.

Predictive value of triple negative breast cancer based on DCE-MRI multi-phase full-volume ROI clinical radiomics model

BACKGROUND

Since no studies compared the value of radiomics features of distinct phases of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for predicting triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

PURPOSE

To identify the optimal phase of DCE-MRI for diagnosing TNBC and, in combination with clinical factors, to develop a clinical-radiomics model to well predict TNBC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 158 patients with pathology-confirmed breast cancer, including 38 cases of TNBC. The patients were randomly divided into the training and validation set (7:3). Eight radiomics models were built based on eight DCE-MR phases, and their performances were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and DeLong's test. The Radscore derived from the best radiomics model was integrated with independent clinical risk factors to construct a clinical-radiomics predictive model, and evaluate its performance using ROC analysis, calibration, and decision curve analyses.

RESULTS

WHO classification, margin, and T2-weighted (T2W) imaging signals were significantly correlated with TNBC and independent risk factors for TNBC (P<0.05). The clinical model yielded areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.867 and 0.843 in the training and validation sets, respectively. The radiomics model based on DCEphase7 achieved the highest efficacy, with an AUC of 0.818 and 0.777. The AUC of the clinical-radiomics model was 0.936 and 0.886 in the training and validation sets, respectively. The decision curve showed the clinical utility of the clinical-radiomics model.

CONCLUSION

The radiomics features of DCE-MRI had the potential to predict TNBC and could improve the performance of clinical risk factors for preoperative personalized prediction of TNBC.

Radiomics signatures for predicting the Ki-67 level and HER-2 status based on bone metastasis from primary breast cancer

This study explores the potential of radiomics to predict the proliferation marker protein Ki-67 levels and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) status based on MRI images of patients with spinal metastasis from primary breast cancer. A total of 110 patients with pathologically confirmed spinal metastases from primary breast cancer were enrolled between Dec. 2017 and Dec. 2021. All patients underwent T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI scans. The PyRadiomics package was used to extract features from the MRI images based on the intraclass correlation coefficient and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The most predictive features were used to develop the radiomics signature. The Chi-Square test, Fisher's exact test, Student's t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test were used to evaluate the clinical and pathological characteristics between the high- and low-level Ki-67 groups and the HER-2 positive/negative groups. The radiomics models were compared using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity (SEN), and specificity (SPE) were generated as comparison metrics. From the spinal MRI scans, five and two features were identified as the most predictive for the Ki-67 level and HER-2 status, respectively. The developed radiomics signatures generated good prediction performance for the Ki-67 level in the training (AUC = 0.812, 95% CI: 0.710-0.914, SEN = 0.667, SPE = 0.846) and validation (AUC = 0.799, 95% CI: 0.652-0.947, SEN = 0.722, SPE = 0.833) cohorts. Good prediction performance for the HER-2 status was also achieved in the training (AUC = 0.796, 95% CI: 0.686-0.906, SEN = 0.720, SPE = 0.776) and validation (AUC = 0.705, 95% CI: 0.506-0.904, SEN = 0.733, SPE = 0.762) cohorts. The results of this study provide a better understanding of the potential clinical implications of spinal MRI-based radiomics on the prediction of Ki-67 levels and HER-2 status in breast cancer.

Update on DWI for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring

DWI is a noncontrast MRI technique that measures the diffusion of water molecules within biologic tissue. DWI is increasingly incorporated into routine breast MRI examinations. Currently, the main applications of DWI are breast cancer detection and characterization, prognostication, and prediction of treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, DWI is promising as a noncontrast MRI alternative for breast cancer screening. Problems with suboptimal resolution and image quality have restricted the mainstream use of DWI for breast imaging, but these shortcomings are being addressed through several technologic advancements. In this review, we present an up-to-date assessment of the use of DWI for breast cancer imaging, including a summary of the clinical literature and recommendations for future use.

Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Non-Mono-Exponential Model-Based Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for the Prediction of Prognostic Biomarkers and Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer Based on Radiomics

BACKGROUND

Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and non-mono-exponential model-based diffusion-weighted imaging (NME-DWI) that does not require contrast agent can both characterize breast cancer. However, which technique is superior remains unclear.

PURPOSE

To compare the performances of DCE-MRI, NME-DWI and their combination as multiparametric MRI (MP-MRI) in the prediction of breast cancer prognostic biomarkers and molecular subtypes based on radiomics.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

A total of 477 female patients with 483 breast cancers (5-fold cross-validation: training/validation, 80%/20%).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 3.0 T/DCE-MRI (6 dynamic frames) and NME-DWI (13 b values).

ASSESSMENT

After data preprocessing, high-throughput features were extracted from each tumor volume of interest, and optimal features were selected using recursive feature elimination method. To identify ER+ vs. ER-, PR+ vs. PR-, HER2+ vs. HER2-, Ki-67+ vs. Ki-67-, luminal A/B vs. nonluminal A/B, and triple negative (TN) vs. non-TN, the following models were implemented: random forest, adaptive boosting, support vector machine, linear discriminant analysis, and logistic regression.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Student's t, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests were applied on clinical characteristics to confirm whether significant differences exist between different statuses (±) of prognostic biomarkers or molecular subtypes. The model performances were compared between the DCE-MRI, NME-DWI, and MP-MRI datasets using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the DeLong test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

With few exceptions, no significant differences (P = 0.062-0.984) were observed in the AUCs of models for six classification tasks between the DCE-MRI (AUC = 0.62-0.87) and NME-DWI (AUC = 0.62-0.91) datasets, while the model performances on the two imaging datasets were significantly poorer than on the MP-MRI dataset (AUC = 0.68-0.93). Additionally, the random forest and adaptive boosting models (AUC = 0.62-0.93) outperformed other three models (AUC = 0.62-0.90).

DATA CONCLUSION

NME-DWI was comparable with DCE-MRI in predictive performance and could be used as an alternative technique. Besides, MP-MRI demonstrated significantly higher AUCs than either DCE-MRI or NME-DWI.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

2.

TECHNICAL EFFICACY

Stage 2.

Improving the malignancy prediction of breast cancer based on the integration of radiomics features from dual-view mammography and clinical parameters

Radiomics has been a promising imaging biomarker for many malignant diseases. We developed a novel radiomics strategy that incorporating radiomics features extracted from dual-view mammograms and clinical parameters for identifying benign and malignant breast lesions, and validated whether the radiomics assessment could improve the accurate diagnosis of breast cancer. A total of 380 patients (mean age, 52 ± 7 years) with 621 breast lesions utilizing mammograms on craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views were randomly allocated into the training (n = 486) and testing (n = 135) sets in this retrospective study. A total of 1184 and 2368 radiomics features were extracted from single-position region of interest (ROI) and position-paired ROI, separately. Clinical parameters were then combined for better prediction. Recursive feature elimination and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator methods were applied to select optimal predictive features. Random forest was used to conduct the predictive model. Intraclass correlation coefficient test was used to assess repeatability and reproducibility of features. After preprocessing, 467 radiomics features and clinical parameters remained in the single-view and dual-view models. The performance and significance of models were quantified by the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. The correlation analysis between variables was evaluated using the correlation ratio and Pearson correlation coefficient. The model using a combination of dual-view radiomics and clinical parameters achieved a favorable performance (AUC: 0.804, 95% CI: 0.668-0.916), outperformed single-view model and model without clinical parameters. Incorporating with radiomics features of dual-view (CC&MLO) mammogram, age, breast density, and type of suspicious lesions can provide a noninvasive approach to evaluate the malignancy of breast lesions and facilitate clinical decision-making.

Predicting Breast Cancer Subtypes Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Radiomics With Automatic Segmentation

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to demonstrate whether radiomics based on an automatic segmentation method is feasible for predicting molecular subtypes.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 516 patients with confirmed breast cancer. An automatic segmentation-3-dimensional UNet-based Convolutional Neural Networks, trained on our in-house data set-was applied to segment the regions of interest. A set of 1316 radiomics features per region of interest was extracted. Eighteen cross-combination radiomics methods-with 6 feature selection methods and 3 classifiers-were used for model selection. Model classification performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.

RESULTS

The average dice similarity coefficient value of the automatic segmentation was 0.89. The radiomics models were predictive of 4 molecular subtypes with the best average: AUC = 0.8623, accuracy = 0.6596, sensitivity = 0.6383, and specificity = 0.8775. For luminal versus nonluminal subtypes, AUC = 0.8788 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8505-0.9071), accuracy = 0.7756, sensitivity = 0.7973, and specificity = 0.7466. For human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched versus non-HER2-enriched subtypes, AUC = 0.8676 (95% CI, 0.8370-0.8982), accuracy = 0.7737, sensitivity = 0.8859, and specificity = 0.7283. For triple-negative breast cancer versus non-triple-negative breast cancer subtypes, AUC = 0.9335 (95% CI, 0.9027-0.9643), accuracy = 0.9110, sensitivity = 0.4444, and specificity = 0.9865.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics based on automatic segmentation of magnetic resonance imaging can predict breast cancer of 4 molecular subtypes noninvasively and is potentially applicable in large samples.

Omics Technologies Improving Breast Cancer Research and Diagnostics

Breast cancer (BC) has yielded approximately 2.26 million new cases and has caused nearly 685,000 deaths worldwide in the last two years, making it the most common diagnosed cancer type in the world. BC is an intricate ecosystem formed by both the tumor microenvironment and malignant cells, and its heterogeneity impacts the response to treatment. Biomedical research has entered the era of massive omics data thanks to the high-throughput sequencing revolution, quick progress and widespread adoption. These technologies-liquid biopsy, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, metabolomics, pharmaco-omics and artificial intelligence imaging-could help researchers and clinicians to better understand the formation and evolution of BC. This review focuses on the findings of recent multi-omics-based research that has been applied to BC research, with an introduction to every omics technique and their applications for the different BC phenotypes, biomarkers, target therapies, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis, to provide a comprehensive overview of the possibilities of BC research.

Breast Cancer Surrogate Subtype Classification Using Pretreatment Multi-Phase Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

This study aimed to explore the potential of multi-phase dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) radiomics for classifying breast cancer surrogate subtypes. This retrospective study analyzed 360 breast cancers from 319 patients who underwent pretreatment DCE-MRI between January 2015 and January 2019. The cohort consisted of 33 triple-negative, 26 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, 109 luminal A-like, 144 luminal B-like HER2-negative, and 48 luminal B-like HER2-positive lesions. A total of 1781 radiomic features were extracted from manually segmented breast cancers in each DCE-MRI sequence. The model was internally validated and selected using ten times repeated five-fold cross-validation on the primary cohort, with further evaluation using a validation cohort. The most successful models were logistic regression models applied to the third post-contrast subtraction images. These models exhibited the highest area under the curve (AUC) for discriminating between luminal A like vs. others (AUC: 0.78), luminal B-like HER2 negative vs. others (AUC: 0.57), luminal B-like HER2 positive vs. others (AUC: 0.60), HER2 positive vs. others (AUC: 0.81), and triple negative vs. others (AUC: 0.83). In conclusion, the radiomic features extracted from multi-phase DCE-MRI are promising for discriminating between breast cancer subtypes. The best-performing models relied on tissue changes observed during the mid-stage of the imaging process.

Artificial intelligence: opportunities and challenges in the clinical applications of triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15-20% of all invasive breast cancer subtypes. Owing to its clinical characteristics, such as the lack of effective therapeutic targets, high invasiveness, and high recurrence rate, TNBC is difficult to treat and has a poor prognosis. Currently, with the accumulation of large amounts of medical data and the development of computing technology, artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning, has been applied to various aspects of TNBC research, including early screening, diagnosis, identification of molecular subtypes, personalised treatment, and prediction of prognosis and treatment response. In this review, we discussed the general principles of artificial intelligence, summarised its main applications in the diagnosis and treatment of TNBC, and provided new ideas and theoretical basis for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of TNBC.

Imaging in metastatic breast cancer, CT, PET/CT, MRI, WB-DWI, CCA: review and new perspectives

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer in women and remains the second leading cause of death in Western countries. It represents a heterogeneous group of diseases with diverse tumoral behaviour, treatment responsiveness and prognosis. While major progress in diagnosis and treatment has resulted in a decline in breast cancer-related mortality, some patients will relapse and prognosis in this cohort of patients remains poor. Treatment is determined according to tumor subtype; primarily hormone receptor status and HER2 expression. Menopausal status and site of disease relapse are also important considerations in treatment protocols.

MAIN BODY

Staging and repeated evaluation of patients with metastatic breast cancer are central to the accurate assessment of disease extent at diagnosis and during treatment; guiding ongoing clinical management. Advances have been made in the diagnostic and therapeutic fields, particularly with new targeted therapies. In parallel, oncological imaging has evolved exponentially with the development of functional and anatomical imaging techniques. Consistent, reproducible and validated methods of assessing response to therapy is critical in effectively managing patients with metastatic breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

Major progress has been made in oncological imaging over the last few decades. Accurate disease assessment at diagnosis and during treatment is important in the management of metastatic breast cancer. CT (and BS if appropriate) is generally widely available, relatively cheap and sufficient in many cases. However, several additional imaging modalities are emerging and can be used as adjuncts, particularly in pregnancy or other diagnostically challenging cases. Nevertheless, no single imaging technique is without limitation. The authors have evaluated the vast array of imaging techniques - individual, combined parametric and multimodal - that are available or that are emerging in the management of metastatic breast cancer. This includes WB DW-MRI, CCA, novel PET breast cancer-epitope specific radiotracers and radiogenomics.

Application of DCE-MRI radiomics signature analysis in differentiating molecular subtypes of luminal and non-luminal breast cancer

Background

The goal of this study was to develop and validate a radiomics signature based on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) preoperatively differentiating luminal and non-luminal molecular subtypes in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Methods

One hundred and thirty-five invasive breast cancer patients with luminal (n = 78) and non-luminal (n = 57) molecular subtypes were divided into training set (n = 95) and testing set (n = 40) in a 7:3 ratio. Demographics and MRI radiological features were used to construct clinical risk factors. Radiomics signature was constructed by extracting radiomics features from the second phase of DCE-MRI images and radiomics score (rad-score) was calculated. Finally, the prediction performance was evaluated in terms of calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness.

Results

Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that no clinical risk factors were independent predictors of luminal and non-luminal molecular subtypes in invasive breast cancer patients. Meanwhile, the radiomics signature showed good discrimination in the training set (AUC, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93) and the testing set (AUC, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65-0.95).

Conclusion

The DCE-MRI radiomics signature is a promising tool to discrimination luminal and non-luminal molecular subtypes in invasive breast cancer patients preoperatively and noninvasively.

Development and Validation of an Ultrasound-Based Radiomics Nomogram for Identifying HER2 Status in Patients with Breast Carcinoma

(1) Objective: To evaluate the performance of ultrasound-based radiomics in the preoperative prediction of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) and HER2- breast carcinoma. (2) Methods: Ultrasound images from 309 patients (86 HER2+ cases and 223 HER2- cases) were retrospectively analyzed, of which 216 patients belonged to the training set and 93 patients assigned to the time-independent validation set. The region of interest of the tumors was delineated, and the radiomics features were extracted. Radiomics features underwent dimensionality reduction analyses using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), Mann-Whitney U test, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm. The radiomics score (Rad-score) for each patient was calculated through a linear combination of the nonzero coefficient features. The support vector machine (SVM), K nearest neighbors (KNN), logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), naive Bayes (NB) and XGBoost (XGB) machine learning classifiers were trained to establish prediction models based on the Rad-score. A clinical model based on significant clinical features was also established. In addition, the logistic regression method was used to integrate Rad-score and clinical features to generate the nomogram model. The leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV) method was used to validate the reliability and stability of the model. (3) Results: Among the seven classifier models, the LR achieved the best performance in the validation set, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.786, and was obtained as the Rad-score model, while the RF performed the worst. Tumor size showed a statistical difference between the HER2+ and HER2- groups (p = 0.028). The nomogram model had a slightly higher AUC than the Rad-score model (AUC, 0.788 vs. 0.786), but no statistical difference (Delong test, p = 0.919). The LOOCV method yielded a high median AUC of 0.790 in the validation set. (4) Conclusion: The Rad-score model performs best among the seven classifiers. The nomogram model based on Rad-score and tumor size has slightly better predictive performance than the Rad-score model, and it has the potential to be utilized as a routine modality for preoperatively determining HER2 status in BC patients non-invasively.

Radiomics-based signature of breast cancer on preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI to predict axillary metastasis

Aim: This study aimed to predict axillary metastasis using radiology features in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Methods: This study included 243 breast lesions confirmed as malignant based on axillary status. Most outcome-predictive features were selected using four machine-learning algorithms. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to reflect diagnostic performance. Results: Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator was used to dimensionally reduce 1137 radiomics features to three features. Three optimal radiomics features were used to model construction. The logistic regression model achieved an accuracy of 97% and 85% in the training and test groups. Clinical utility was evaluated using decision curve analysis. Conclusion: The novel combination of radiomics analysis and machine-learning algorithm could predict axillary metastasis and prevent invasive manipulation.

Value of genomics- and radiomics-based machine learning models in the identification of breast cancer molecular subtypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

In the era of precision therapy, early classification of breast cancer (BRCA) molecular subtypes has clinical significance for disease management and prognosis. We explored the accuracy of machine learning (ML) models for early classification of BRCA molecular subtypes through a systematic review of the literature currently available.

Methods

We retrieved relevant studies published in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science until 15 April 2022. A prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST) was applied for the assessment of risk of bias of a genomics-based ML model, and the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) was simultaneously used to evaluate the quality of this radiomics-based ML model. A random effects model was adopted to analyze the predictive accuracy of genomics-based ML and radiomics-based ML for Luminal A, Luminal B, Basal-like or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). The PROSPERO of our study was prospectively registered (CRD42022333611).

Results

Of the 38 studies were selected for analysis, 14 ML models were based on gene-transcriptomic, with only 4 external validations; and 43 ML models were based on radiomics, with only 14 external validations. Meta-analysis results showed that c-statistic values of the ML based on radiomics for the identification of BRCA molecular subtypes Luminal A, Luminal B, Basal-like or TNBC, and HER2 were 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.60-0.96], 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69-0.87), 0.89 (95% CI: 0.83-0.91), and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.81-0.86), respectively. The c-statistic values of ML based on the gene-transcriptomic analysis cohort for the identification of the previously described BRCA molecular subtypes were 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-0.99), 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-0.99), 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95-1.00), and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.98) respectively. Additionally, the sensitivity of the ML model based on radiomics for each molecular subtype ranged from 0.79 to 0.85, while the sensitivity of the ML model based on gene-transcriptomic was between 0.92 and 0.99.

Conclusions

Both radiomics and gene transcriptomics produced ideal effects on BRCA molecular subtype prediction. Compared with radiomics, gene transcriptomics yielded better prediction results, but radiomics was simpler and more convenient from a clinical point of view.

Development and validation of an ultrasound-based radiomics nomogram for predicting the luminal from non-luminal type in patients with breast carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The molecular subtype plays a significant role in breast carcinoma (BC), which is the main indicator to guide treatment and is closely associated with prognosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of an ultrasound-based radiomics nomogram in preoperatively discriminating the luminal from non-luminal type in patients with BC.

METHODS

A total of 264 BC patients who underwent routine ultrasound examination were enrolled in this study, of which 184 patients belonged to the training set and 80 patients to the test set. Breast tumors were delineated manually on the ultrasound images and then radiomics features were extracted. In the training set, the T test and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were used for selecting features, and the radiomics score (Rad-score) for each patient was calculated. Based on the clinical risk features, Rad-score, and combined clinical risk features and Rad-score, three models were established, respectively. The performances of the models were validated with receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

In all, 788 radiomics features per case were obtained from the ultrasound images. Through radiomics feature selection, 11 features were selected to constitute the Rad-score. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the Rad-score for predicting the luminal type was 0.828 in the training set and 0.786 in the test set. The nomogram comprising the Rad-score and US-reported tumor size showed AUCs of the training and test sets were 0.832 and 0.767, respectively, which were significantly higher than the AUCs of the clinical model in the training and test sets (0.691 and 0.526, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in predictive performance between the Rad-score and nomogram.

CONCLUSION

Both the Rad-score and nomogram can be applied as useful, noninvasive tools for preoperatively discriminating the luminal from non-luminal type in patients with BC. Furthermore, this study might provide a novel technique to evaluate molecular subtypes of BC.

Multiregional Radiomic Signatures Based on Functional Parametric Maps from DCE-MRI for Preoperative Identification of Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Status in Breast Cancer

Radiomics based on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) has been used for breast estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status evaluation. However, the radiomic features of peritumoral regions were not thoroughly analyzed. This study aimed to establish and validate the multiregional radiomic signatures (RSs) for the preoperative identification of the ER and PR status in breast cancer. A total of 443 patients with breast cancer were divided into training (n = 356) and validation (n = 87) sets. Radiomic features were extracted from intra- and peritumoral regions on six functional parametric maps from DCE-MRI. A two-sample t-test, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, and stepwise were used for feature selections. Three RSs for predicting the ER and PR status were constructed using a logistic regression model based on selected intratumoral, peritumoral, and combined intra- and peritumoral radiomic features. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the discriminative performance of three RSs. The AUCs of intra- and peritumoral RSs for identifying the ER status were 0.828/0.791 and 0.755/0.733 in the training and validation sets, respectively. For predicting the PR status, intra- and peritumoral RSs resulted in AUCs of 0.816/0.749 and 0.806/0.708 in the training and validation sets, respectively. Multiregional RSs achieved the best AUCs among three RSs for evaluating the ER (0.851 and 0.833) and PR (0.848 and 0.763) status. In conclusion, multiregional RSs based on functional parametric maps from DCE-MRI showed promising results for preoperatively evaluating the ER and PR status in breast cancer patients. Further studies using a larger cohort from multiple centers are necessary to confirm the reliability of the established models before clinical application.

Artificial intelligence in multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging: A review

Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is an indispensable tool in the clinical workflow for the diagnosis and treatment planning of various diseases. Machine learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) methods, especially those adopting the deep learning technique, have been extensively employed to perform mpMRI image classification, segmentation, registration, detection, reconstruction, and super-resolution. The current availability of increasing computational power and fast-improving AI algorithms have empowered numerous computer-based systems for applying mpMRI to disease diagnosis, imaging-guided radiotherapy, patient risk and overall survival time prediction, and the development of advanced quantitative imaging technology for magnetic resonance fingerprinting. However, the wide application of these developed systems in the clinic is still limited by a number of factors, including robustness, reliability, and interpretability. This survey aims to provide an overview for new researchers in the field as well as radiologists with the hope that they can understand the general concepts, main application scenarios, and remaining challenges of AI in mpMRI. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

A Simultaneous Multiparametric 18F-FDG PET/MRI Radiomics Model for the Diagnosis of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Simple Summary

In this study, we aimed to build a machine-learning predictive model for the identification of triple negative breast cancer, the most aggressive subtype, using quantitative parameters and radiomics features extracted from tumor lesions on hybrid PET/MRI. The good performance of the model supports the hypothesis that hybrid PET/MRI can provide quantitative data able to non-invasively detect tumor biological characteristics using artificial intelligence software and further encourages the conduction of additional studies for this purpose.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate whether a machine learning (ML)-based radiomics model applied to ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI is effective in molecular subtyping of breast cancer (BC) and specifically in discriminating triple negative (TN) from other molecular subtypes of BC. Methods: Eighty-six patients with 98 BC lesions (Luminal A = 10, Luminal B = 51, HER2+ = 12, TN = 25) were included and underwent simultaneous ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI of the breast. A 3D segmentation of BC lesion was performed on T2w, DCE, DWI and PET images. Quantitative diffusion and metabolic parameters were calculated and radiomics features extracted. Data were selected using the LASSO regression and used by a fine gaussian support vector machine (SVM) classifier with a 5-fold cross validation for identification of TNBC lesions. Results: Eight radiomics models were built based on different combinations of quantitative parameters and/or radiomic features. The best performance (AUROC 0.887, accuracy 82.8%, sensitivity 79.7%, specificity 86%, PPV 85.3%, NPV 80.8%) was found for the model combining first order, neighborhood gray level dependence matrix and size zone matrix-based radiomics features extracted from ADC and PET images. Conclusion: A ML-based radiomics model applied to ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI is able to non-invasively discriminate TNBC lesions from other BC molecular subtypes with high accuracy. In a future perspective, a “virtual biopsy” might be performed with radiomics signatures.

Intra- and Peritumoral Radiomics Model Based on Early DCE-MRI for Preoperative Prediction of Molecular Subtypes in Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma: A Multitask Machine Learning Study

Purpose

The aim of this study is to investigate radiomics features extracted from the optimal peritumoral region and the intratumoral area on the early phase of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) for predicting molecular subtypes of invasive ductal breast carcinoma (IDBC).

Methods

A total of 422 IDBC patients with immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization results from two hospitals (Center 1: 327 cases, Center 2: 95 cases) who underwent preoperative DCE-MRI were retrospectively enrolled. After image preprocessing, radiomic features were extracted from the intratumoral area and four peritumoral regions on DCE-MRI from two centers, and selected the optimal peritumoral region. Based on the intratumoral, peritumoral radiomics features, and clinical–radiological characteristics, five radiomics models were constructed through support vector machine (SVM) in multiple classification tasks related to molecular subtypes and visualized by nomogram. The performance of radiomics models was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curves, confusion matrix, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis.

Results

A 6-mm peritumoral size was defined the optimal peritumoral region in classification tasks of hormone receptor (HR)-positive vs others, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) vs others, and HR-positive vs human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched vs TNBC, and 8 mm was applied in HER2-enriched vs others. The combined clinical–radiological and radiomics models in three binary classification tasks (HR-positive vs others, HER2-enriched vs others, TNBC vs others) obtained optimal performance with AUCs of 0.838, 0.848, and 0.930 in the training cohort, respectively; 0.827, 0.813, and 0.879 in the internal test cohort, respectively; and 0.791, 0.707, and 0.852 in the external test cohort, respectively.

Conclusion

Radiomics features in the intratumoral and peritumoral regions of IDBC on DCE-MRI had a potential to predict the HR-positive, HER2-enriched, and TNBC molecular subtypes preoperatively.

Prediction Breast Molecular Typing of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Based on Dynamic Contrast Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics Characteristics: A Feasibility Study

Objective

To investigate the feasibility of radiomics in predicting molecular subtype of breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) based on dynamic contrast enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI).

Methods

A total of 303 cases with pathologically confirmed IDC from January 2018 to March 2021 were enrolled in this study, including 223 cases from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (training/test set) and 80 cases from Shaoxing Central Hospital (validation set). All the cases were classified as HR+/Luminal, HER2-enriched, and TNBC according to immunohistochemistry. DCE-MRI original images were treated by semi-automated segmentation to initially extract original and wavelet-transformed radiomic features. The extended logistic regression with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) penalty was applied to identify the optimal radiomic features, which were then used to establish predictive models combined with significant clinical risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis were adopted to evaluate the effectiveness and clinical benefit of the models established.

Results

Of the 223 cases from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, HR+/Luminal cancers were diagnosed in 116 cases (52.02%), HER2-enriched in 71 cases (31.84%), and TNBC in 36 cases (16.14%). Based on the training set, 788 radiomic features were extracted in total and 8 optimal features were further identified, including 2 first-order features, 1 gray-level run length matrix (GLRLM), 4 gray-level co-occurrence matrices (GLCM), and 1 3D shape feature. Three multi-class classification models were constructed by extended logistic regression: clinical model (age, menopause, tumor location, Ki-67, histological grade, and lymph node metastasis), radiomic model, and combined model. The macro-average areas under the ROC curve (macro-AUC) for the three models were 0.71, 0.81, and 0.84 in the training set, 0.73, 0.81, and 0.84 in the test set, and 0.76, 0.82, and 0.83 in the validation set, respectively.

Conclusion

The DCE-MRI-based radiomic features are significant biomarkers for distinguishing molecular subtypes of breast cancer noninvasively. Notably, the classification performance could be improved with the fusion analysis of multi-modal features.

Multiparametric 18F-FDG PET/MRI-Based Radiomics for Prediction of Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess whether multiparametric ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI-based radiomics analysis is able to predict pathological complete response in breast cancer patients and hence potentially enhance pretherapeutic patient stratification.

METHODS

A total of 73 female patients (mean age 49 years; range 27-77 years) with newly diagnosed, therapy-naive breast cancer underwent simultaneous ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI and were included in this retrospective study. All PET/MRI datasets were imported to dedicated software (ITK-SNAP v. 3.6.0) for lesion annotation using a semi-automated method. Pretreatment biopsy specimens were used to determine tumor histology, tumor and nuclear grades, and immunohistochemical status. Histopathological results from surgical tumor specimens were used as the reference standard to distinguish between complete pathological response (pCR) and noncomplete pathological response. An elastic net was employed to select the most important radiomic features prior to model development. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated for each model.

RESULTS

The best results in terms of AUCs and NPV for predicting complete pathological response in the entire cohort were obtained by the combination of all MR sequences and PET (0.8 and 79.5%, respectively), and no significant differences from the other models were observed. In further subgroup analyses, combining all MR and PET data, the best AUC (0.94) for predicting complete pathologic response was obtained in the HR+/HER2- group. No difference between results with/without the inclusion of PET characteristics was observed in the TN/HER2+ group, each leading to an AUC of 0.92 for all MR and all MR + PET datasets.

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI enables comprehensive high-quality radiomics analysis for the prediction of pCR in breast cancer patients, especially in those with HR+/HER2- receptor status.

Diagnostic Value of Radiomics Analysis in Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography for Identifying Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Purpose

To evaluate the value of radiomics analysis in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) for the identification of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Method

CESM images of 367 pathologically confirmed breast cancer patients (training set: 218, testing set: 149) were retrospectively analyzed. Cranial caudal (CC), mediolateral oblique (MLO), and combined models were built on the basis of the features extracted from subtracted images on CC, MLO, and the combination of CC and MLO, respectively, in the tumour region. The performance of the models was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The areas under ROC curves (AUCs) were compared through the DeLong test.

Results

The combined CC and MLO model had the best AUC and sensitivity of 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.85–0.96) and 0.97, respectively. The Hosmer–Lemeshow test yielded a non-significant statistic with p-value of 0.59. The clinical usefulness of the combined CC and MLO model was confirmed if the threshold was between 0.02 and 0.81 in the DCA.

Conclusions

Machine learning models based on subtracted images in CESM images were valuable for distinguishing TNBC and NTNBC. The model with the combined CC and MLO features had the best performance compared with models that used CC or MLO features alone.

Artificial intelligence in breast cancer imaging: risk stratification, lesion detection and classification, treatment planning and prognosis-a narrative review

The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) represents a real game changer in today's landscape of breast cancer imaging. Several innovative AI-based tools have been developed and validated in recent years that promise to accelerate the goal of real patient-tailored management. Numerous studies confirm that proper integration of AI into existing clinical workflows could bring significant benefits to women, radiologists, and healthcare systems. The AI-based approach has proved particularly useful for developing new risk prediction models that integrate multi-data streams for planning individualized screening protocols. Furthermore, AI models could help radiologists in the pre-screening and lesion detection phase, increasing diagnostic accuracy, while reducing workload and complications related to overdiagnosis. Radiomics and radiogenomics approaches could extrapolate the so-called imaging signature of the tumor to plan a targeted treatment. The main challenges to the development of AI tools are the huge amounts of high-quality data required to train and validate these models and the need for a multidisciplinary team with solid machine-learning skills. The purpose of this article is to present a summary of the most important AI applications in breast cancer imaging, analyzing possible challenges and new perspectives related to the widespread adoption of these new tools.

Decoding the molecular subtypes of breast cancer seen on multimodal ultrasound images using an assembled convolutional neural network model: A prospective and multicentre study

Background

Preoperative determination of breast cancer molecular subtypes facilitates individualized treatment plan-making and improves patient prognosis. We aimed to develop an assembled convolutional neural network (ACNN) model for the preoperative prediction of molecular subtypes using multimodal ultrasound (US) images.

Methods

This multicentre study prospectively evaluated a dataset of greyscale US, colour Doppler flow imaging (CDFI), and shear-wave elastography (SWE) images in 807 patients with 818 breast cancers from November 2016 to February 2021. The St. Gallen molecular subtypes of breast cancer were confirmed by postoperative immunohistochemical examination. The monomodal ACNN model based on greyscale US images, the dual-modal ACNN model based on greyscale US and CDFI images, and the multimodal ACNN model based on greyscale US and CDFI as well as SWE images were constructed in the training cohort. The performances of three ACNN models in predicting four- and five-classification molecular subtypes and identifying triple negative from non-triple negative subtypes were assessed and compared. The performance of the multimodal ACNN was also compared with preoperative core needle biopsy (CNB).

Finding

The performance of the multimodal ACNN model (macroaverage area under the curve [AUC]: 0.89–0.96) was superior to that of the dual-modal ACNN model (macroaverage AUC: 0.81–0.84) and the monomodal ACNN model (macroaverage AUC: 0.73–0.75) in predicting four-classification breast cancer molecular subtypes, which was also better than that of preoperative CNB (AUC: 0.89–0.99 vs. 0.67–0.82, p < 0.05). In addition, the multimodal ACNN model outperformed the other two ACNN models in predicting five-classification molecular subtypes (AUC: 0.87–0.94 vs. 0.78-0.81 vs. 0.71–0.78) and identifying triple negative from non-triple negative breast cancers (AUC: 0.934–0.970 vs. 0.688–0.830 vs. 0.536–0.650, p < 0.05). Moreover, the multimodal ACNN model obtained satisfactory prediction performance for both T1 and non-T1 lesions (AUC: 0.957–0.958 and 0.932–0.985).

Interpretation

The multimodal US-based ACNN model is a potential noninvasive decision-making method for the management of patients with breast cancer in clinical practice.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 81725008 and 81927801), Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (Grants 2019LJ21 and SHSLCZDZK03502), and the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Grants 19441903200, 19DZ2251100, and 21Y11910800).

Radiomics in breast MRI: current progress toward clinical application in the era of artificial intelligence

Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive imaging modality for breast cancer diagnosis and is widely used clinically. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI is the basis for breast MRI, but ultrafast images, T2-weighted images, and diffusion-weighted images are also taken to improve the characteristics of the lesion. Such multiparametric MRI with numerous morphological and functional data poses new challenges to radiologists, and thus, new tools for reliable, reproducible, and high-volume quantitative assessments are warranted. In this context, radiomics, which is an emerging field of research involving the conversion of digital medical images into mineable data for clinical decision-making and outcome prediction, has been gaining ground in oncology. Recent development in artificial intelligence has promoted radiomics studies in various fields including breast cancer treatment and numerous studies have been conducted. However, radiomics has shown a translational gap in clinical practice, and many issues remain to be solved. In this review, we will outline the steps of radiomics workflow and investigate clinical application of radiomics focusing on breast MRI based on published literature, as well as current discussion about limitations and challenges in radiomics.

Radiomic differentiation of breast cancer molecular subtypes using pre-operative breast imaging - A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer has four distinct molecular subtypes which are discriminated using gene expression profiling following biopsy. Radiogenomics is an emerging field which utilises diagnostic imaging to reveal genomic properties of disease. We aimed to perform a systematic review of the current literature to evaluate the value radiomics in differentiating breast cancers into their molecular subtypes using diagnostic imaging.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA guidelines. Studies assessing radiomictumour analysis in differentiatingbreast cancer molecular subtypeswere included. Quality was assessed using the radiomics quality score (RQS). Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of radiomic analyses were included for meta-analysis; Study specific sensitivity and specificity were retrieved and summary ROC analysis were performed to compile pooled sensitivities and specificities.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies were included. Overall, there were 10,090 female patients (mean age of 47.6 ± 11.7 years, range: 21-93) and molecular subtypewas reported in 7,693 of cases, with Luminal A (LABC), Luminal B (LBBC), Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 overexpressing (HER2+), and Triple Negative (TNBC) breast cancers representing 51.3%, 19.9%, 12.3% and 16.3% of tumour respectively. Seven studies provided radiomic analysis to determine molecular subtypes using mammography to differentiateTNBCvs.others (sensitivity: 0.82,specificity:0.79). Thirty-five studies reported on radiomic analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); LABC versus others(sensitivity:0.78,specificity:0.83),HER2+versusothers(sensitivity:0.87,specificity:0.88), andLBBCversusTNBC (sensitivity: 0.79,specificity:0.88) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Radiomic tumour assessment of contemporary breast imaging provide a novel option in determining breast cancer molecular subtypes. However, amelioration of such techniques are required and genetic expression assessment will remain the gold standard.

Quantitative Multiparametric MRI as an Imaging Biomarker for the Prediction of Breast Cancer Receptor Status and Molecular Subtypes

Objectives

To assess breast cancer receptor status and molecular subtypes by using the CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE and readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion weighted imaging techniques.

Methods

A total of 165 breast cancer patients were retrospectively recruited. Patient age, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factorreceptor-2 (HER-2) status, and the Ki-67 proliferation index were collected for analysis. Quantitative parameters (K^trans, V_e, K_ep), semiquantitative parameters (W_-in, W_-out, TTP), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were compared in relation to breast cancer receptor status and molecular subtypes. Statistical analysis were performed to compare the parameters in the receptor status and molecular subtype groups.Multivariate analysis was performed to explore confounder-adjusted associations, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the classification performance and calculate thresholds.

Results

Younger age (<49.5 years, odds ratio (OR) =0.95, P=0.004), lower K_ep (<0.704,OR=0.14, P=0.044),and higher TTP (>0.629 min, OR=24.65, P=0.011) were independently associated with progesterone receptor positivity. A higher TTP (>0.585 min, OR=28.19, P=0.01) was independently associated with estrogen receptor positivity. Higher K_ep (>0.892, OR=11.6, P=0.047), lower TTP (<0.582 min, OR<0.001, P=0.004), and lower ADC (<0.719 ×10^-3 mm²/s, OR<0.001, P=0.048) had stronger independent associations with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) compared to luminal A, and those parameters could differentiate TNBC from luminal A with the highest AUC of 0.811.

Conclusions

K_ep and TTP were independently associated with hormone receptor status. In addition, the K_ep, TTP, and ADC values had stronger independent associations with TNBC than with luminal A and could be used as imaging biomarkers for differentiate TNBC from Luminal A.

Multi-Parametric MRI-Based Radiomics Models for Predicting Molecular Subtype and Androgen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer

Objective

To investigate whether radiomics features extracted from multi-parametric MRI combining machine learning approach can predict molecular subtype and androgen receptor (AR) expression of breast cancer in a non-invasive way.

Materials and Methods

Patients diagnosed with clinical T2–4 stage breast cancer from March 2016 to July 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. The molecular subtypes and AR expression in pre-treatment biopsy specimens were assessed. A total of 4,198 radiomics features were extracted from the pre-biopsy multi-parametric MRI (including dynamic contrast-enhancement T1-weighted images, fat-suppressed T2-weighted images, and apparent diffusion coefficient map) of each patient. We applied several feature selection strategies including the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and recursive feature elimination (RFE), the maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR), Boruta and Pearson correlation analysis, to select the most optimal features. We then built 120 diagnostic models using distinct classification algorithms and feature sets divided by MRI sequences and selection strategies to predict molecular subtype and AR expression of breast cancer in the testing dataset of leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). The performances of binary classification models were assessed via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). And the performances of multiclass classification models were assessed via AUC, overall accuracy, precision, recall rate, and F1-score.

Results

A total of 162 patients (mean age, 46.91 ± 10.08 years) were enrolled in this study; 30 were low-AR expression and 132 were high-AR expression. HR+/HER2− cancers were diagnosed in 56 cases (34.6%), HER2+ cancers in 81 cases (50.0%), and TNBC in 25 patients (15.4%). There was no significant difference in clinicopathologic characteristics between low-AR and high-AR groups (P > 0.05), except the menopausal status, ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 index (P = 0.043, <0.001, <0.001, 0.015, and 0.006, respectively). No significant difference in clinicopathologic characteristics was observed among three molecular subtypes except the AR status and Ki-67 (P = <0.001 and 0.012, respectively). The Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) showed the best performance in discriminating AR expression, with an AUC of 0.907 and an accuracy of 85.8% in the testing dataset. The highest performances were obtained for discriminating TNBC vs. non-TNBC (AUC: 0.965, accuracy: 92.6%), HER2+ vs. HER2− (AUC: 0.840, accuracy: 79.0%), and HR+/HER2− vs. others (AUC: 0.860, accuracy: 82.1%) using MLP as well. The micro-AUC of MLP multiclass classification model was 0.896, and the overall accuracy was 0.735.

Conclusions

Multi-parametric MRI-based radiomics combining with machine learning approaches provide a promising method to predict the molecular subtype and AR expression of breast cancer non-invasively.

AI-enhanced breast imaging: Where are we and where are we heading?

Significant advances in imaging analysis and the development of high-throughput methods that can extract and correlate multiple imaging parameters with different clinical outcomes have led to a new direction in medical research. Radiomics and artificial intelligence (AI) studies are rapidly evolving and have many potential applications in breast imaging, such as breast cancer risk prediction, lesion detection and classification, radiogenomics, and prediction of treatment response and clinical outcomes. AI has been applied to different breast imaging modalities, including mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging, in different clinical scenarios. The application of AI tools in breast imaging has an unprecedented opportunity to better derive clinical value from imaging data and reshape the way we care for our patients. The aim of this study is to review the current knowledge and future applications of AI-enhanced breast imaging in clinical practice.

Radiomics Analysis Based on Automatic Image Segmentation of DCE-MRI for Predicting Triple-Negative and Nontriple-Negative Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate whether quantitative radiomics features extracted from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) could be used to differentiate triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and nontriple-negative breast cancer (non-TNBC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included DCE-MRI images of 81 breast cancer patients (44 TNBC and 37 non-TNBC) from August 2018 to October 2019. The MR scans were achieved at a 1.5 T MR scanner. For each patient, the largest tumor mass was selected to analyze. Three-dimensional (3D) images of the regions of interest (ROIs) were automatically segmented on the third DCE phase by a deep learning segmentation model; then, the ROIs were checked and revised by 2 radiologists. DCE-MRI radiomics features were extracted from the 3D tumor volume. The patients were randomly divided into training (N = 57) and test (N = 24) cohorts. The machine learning classifier was built in the training dataset, and 5-fold cross-validation was performed on the training cohort to train and validate. The data of the test cohort were used to investigate the predictive power of the radiomics model in predicting TNBC and non-TNBC. The performance of the model was evaluated by the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.

RESULTS

The radiomics model based on 15 features got the best performance. The AUC achieved 0.741 for the cross-validation, and 0.867 for the independent testing cohort.

CONCLUSION

The radiomics model based on automatic image segmentation of DCE-MRI can be used to distinguish TNBC and non-TNBC.

Computer-Aided Diagnosis Evaluation of the Correlation Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer

Background

There is a demand for additional alternative methods that can allow the differentiation of the breast tumor into molecular subtypes precisely and conveniently.

Purpose

The present study aimed to determine suitable optimal classifiers and investigate the general applicability of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) to associate between the breast cancer molecular subtype and the extracted MR imaging features.

Methods

We analyzed a total of 264 patients (mean age: 47.9 ± 9.7 years; range: 19–81 years) with 264 masses (mean size: 28.6 ± 15.86 mm; range: 5–91 mm) using a Unet model and Gradient Tree Boosting for segmentation and classification.

Results

The tumors were segmented clearly by the Unet model automatically. All the extracted features which including the shape features,the texture features of the tumors and the clinical features were input into the classifiers for classification, and the results showed that the GTB classifier is superior to other classifiers, which achieved F1-Score 0.72, AUC 0.81 and score 0.71. Analyzed the different features combinations, we founded that the texture features associated with the clinical features are the optimal features to different the breast cancer subtypes.

Conclusion

CAD is feasible to differentiate the breast cancer subtypes, automatical segmentation were feasible by Unet model and the extracted texture features from breast MR imaging with the clinical features can be used to help differentiating the molecular subtype. Moreover, in the clinical features, BPE and age characteristics have the best potential for subtype.

Multiparametric Integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI-Based Radiomics for Breast Cancer Phenotyping and Tumor Decoding

Simple Summary

Breast cancer is considered the leading cancer type and main cause of cancer death in women. In this study, we assess simultaneous ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI of the breast as a platform for comprehensive radiomics analysis for breast cancer subtype. The radiomics-based analysis comprised prediction of molecular subtype, hormone receptor status, proliferation rate and lymphonodular and distant metastatic spread. Our results demonstrated high accuracy for multiparametric MRI alone as well as ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI as an imaging platform for high-quality non-invasive tissue characterization.

Abstract

Background: This study investigated the performance of simultaneous ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI of the breast as a platform for comprehensive radiomics analysis for breast cancer subtype analysis, hormone receptor status, proliferation rate and lymphonodular and distant metastatic spread. Methods: One hundred and twenty-four patients underwent simultaneous ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI. Breast tumors were segmented and radiomic features were extracted utilizing CERR software following the IBSI guidelines. LASSO regression was employed to select the most important radiomics features prior to model development. Five-fold cross validation was then utilized alongside support vector machines, resulting in predictive models for various combinations of imaging data series. Results: The highest AUC and accuracy for differentiation between luminal A and B was achieved by all MR sequences (AUC 0.98; accuracy 97.3). The best results in AUC for prediction of hormone receptor status and proliferation rate were found based on all MR and PET data (ER AUC 0.87, PR AUC 0.88, Ki-67 AUC 0.997). PET provided the best determination of grading (AUC 0.71), while all MR and PET analyses yielded the best results for lymphonodular and distant metastatic spread (0.81 and 0.99, respectively). Conclusion: ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI enables comprehensive high-quality radiomics analysis for breast cancer phenotyping and tumor decoding, utilizing the perks of simultaneously acquired morphologic, functional and metabolic data.

Iodine Map Radiomics in Breast Cancer: Prediction of Metastatic Status

Simple Summary

Early and accurate diagnosis of breast cancer that has spread to other organs and tissues is crucial, as therapeutic decisions and outcome expectations might change. Computed tomography (CT) is often used to detect breast cancer’s spread, but this method has its weaknesses. The computer-assisted technique “radiomics” extracts grey-level patterns, so-called radiomic features, from medical images, which may reflect underlying biological processes. Our retrospective study therefore evaluated whether breast cancer spread can be predicted by radiomic features derived from iodine maps, an application on a new generation of CT scanners visualizing tissue blood flow. Based on 77 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer, we found that this approach might indeed predict cancer spread to other organs/tissues. In the future, radiomics may serve as an additional tool for cancer detection and risk assessment.

Abstract

Dual-energy CT (DECT) iodine maps enable quantification of iodine concentrations as a marker for tissue vascularization. We investigated whether iodine map radiomic features derived from staging DECT enable prediction of breast cancer metastatic status, and whether textural differences exist between primary breast cancers and metastases. Seventy-seven treatment-naïve patients with biopsy-proven breast cancers were included retrospectively (41 non-metastatic, 36 metastatic). Radiomic features including first-, second-, and higher-order metrics as well as shape descriptors were extracted from volumes of interest on iodine maps. Following principal component analysis, a multilayer perceptron artificial neural network (MLP-NN) was used for classification (70% of cases for training, 30% validation). Histopathology served as reference standard. MLP-NN predicted metastatic status with AUCs of up to 0.94, and accuracies of up to 92.6 in the training and 82.6 in the validation datasets. The separation of primary tumor and metastatic tissue yielded AUCs of up to 0.87, with accuracies of up to 82.8 in the training, and 85.7 in the validation dataset. DECT iodine map-based radiomic signatures may therefore predict metastatic status in breast cancer patients. In addition, microstructural differences between primary and metastatic breast cancer tissue may be reflected by differences in DECT radiomic features.

Clinical usefulness of the fast protocol of breast diffusion-weighted imaging using 3T magnetic resonance imaging with a 16-channel breast coil

We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of a fast protocol of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with one excitation using 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a 16-channel breast coil. We analyzed 30 lesions from 27 women between February 2020 and June 2020. The visibility score (from 1 = extremely poor to 5 = excellent) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value between one and four excitations were evaluated by two readers. The image acquisition time was 40 s for one excitation and 1 min 52 s for four excitations. The visibility scores were 4.630 ± 0.718 and 4.267 ± 1.015 for one excitation and 4.730 ± 0.691 and 4.200 ± 1.000 for four excitations by the two readers. There was no significant difference in the visibility (P = 0.184 and P = 0.423), mean ADC value (P = 0.918 and P = 0.417), and minimum ADC value (P = 0.936 and P = 0.443) between one and four excitations by the two readers. Despite the short acquisition time, the visibility score and ADC values of one-excitation DWI were comparable to that with four excitations. Our fast DWI protocol could provide reproducible visibility and ADC value, potentially helping radiologists to efficiently diagnose patients.

Special Issue: Emerging Technologies for Medical Imaging Diagnostics, Monitoring and Therapy of Cancers

Molecular imaging and therapy play an increasingly important role in the field of "precision medicine" as an emergent prospect for management of the cancerous disease [...].

Breast Tumor Characterization Using [18F]FDG-PET/CT Imaging Combined with Data Preprocessing and Radiomics

Simple Summary

Breast cancer is the second most common diagnosed malignancy in women worldwide. In this study, we examine the feasibility of breast tumor characterization based on [¹⁸F]FDG-PET/CT images using machine learning (ML) approaches in combination with data-preprocessing techniques. ML prediction models for breast cancer detection and the identification of breast cancer receptor status, proliferation rate, and molecular subtypes were established and evaluated. Furthermore, the importance of most repeatable features was investigated. Results displayed high performance of malignant/benign tumor differentiation and triple negative tumor subtype ML models. We observed high repeatability of radiomic features for both high performing predictive models.

Abstract

Background: This study investigated the performance of ensemble learning holomic models for the detection of breast cancer, receptor status, proliferation rate, and molecular subtypes from [¹⁸F]FDG-PET/CT images with and without incorporating data pre-processing algorithms. Additionally, machine learning (ML) models were compared with conventional data analysis using standard uptake value lesion classification. Methods: A cohort of 170 patients with 173 breast cancer tumors (132 malignant, 38 benign) was examined with [¹⁸F]FDG-PET/CT. Breast tumors were segmented and radiomic features were extracted following the imaging biomarker standardization initiative (IBSI) guidelines combined with optimized feature extraction. Ensemble learning including five supervised ML algorithms was utilized in a 100-fold Monte Carlo (MC) cross-validation scheme. Data pre-processing methods were incorporated prior to machine learning, including outlier and borderline noisy sample detection, feature selection, and class imbalance correction. Feature importance in each model was assessed by calculating feature occurrence by the R-squared method across MC folds. Results: Cross validation demonstrated high performance of the cancer detection model (80% sensitivity, 78% specificity, 80% accuracy, 0.81 area under the curve (AUC)), and of the triple negative tumor identification model (85% sensitivity, 78% specificity, 82% accuracy, 0.82 AUC). The individual receptor status and luminal A/B subtype models yielded low performance (0.46–0.68 AUC). SUV_max model yielded 0.76 AUC in cancer detection and 0.70 AUC in predicting triple negative subtype. Conclusions: Predictive models based on [¹⁸F]FDG-PET/CT images in combination with advanced data pre-processing steps aid in breast cancer diagnosis and in ML-based prediction of the aggressive triple negative breast cancer subtype.

[Multimodal, multiparametric and genetic breast imaging]

CLINICAL/METHODOLOGICAL ISSUE

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) aims to visualize and quantify biological, physiological and pathological processes at the cellular and molecular level and provides valuable information about key processes in cancer development and progression. "Omics" strategies (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics) have many uses in oncology.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

Multiparametric MRI of the breast currently includes T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: Additional parameters such as proton magetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST), blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD), hyperpolarized (HP) MRI or lipid MRS are currently being developed and are being evaluated in breast cancer diagnostics.

ACHIEVEMENTS

Radiogenomics is a new direction in medical science that has been made possible by significant advances in imaging and image analysis methods, as well as the development of techniques to extract and correlate various imaging parameters with "omics" data. The aim of radiogenomics is to correlate imaging characteristics (phenotypes) with gene expression patterns, gene mutations and other genome-associated properties and is the evolution of the correlation between radiology and pathology from the anatomical-histological to the molecular level. Quantitative and qualitative imaging biomarkers provide insights into the complex tumor biology. Initial results suggest that radiogemics will play an important role in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of breast cancer.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

This article provides an overview of the current state of radiogenomics of the breast and future applications and challenges.

Prediction of the clinicopathological subtypes of breast cancer using a fisher discriminant analysis model based on radiomic features of diffusion-weighted MRI

BACKGROUND

The clinicopathological classification of breast cancer is proposed according to therapeutic purposes. It is simplified and can be conducted easily in clinical practice, and this subtyping undoubtedly contributes to the treatment selection of breast cancer. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of using a Fisher discriminant analysis model based on radiomic features of diffusion-weighted MRI for predicting the clinicopathological subtypes of breast cancer.

METHODS

Patients who underwent breast magnetic resonance imaging were confirmed by retrieving data from our institutional picture archiving and communication system (PACS) between March 2013 and September 2017. Five clinicopathological subtypes were determined based on the status of ER, PR, HER2 and Ki-67 from the immunohistochemical test. The radiomic features of diffusion-weighted imaging were derived from the volume of interest (VOI) of each tumour. Fisher discriminant analysis was performed for clinicopathological subtyping by using a backward selection method. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the radiomic features, ROC analyses were performed to differentiate between immunohistochemical biomarker-positive and -negative groups.

RESULTS

A total of 84 radiomic features of four statistical methods were included after preprocessing. The overall accuracy for predicting the clinicopathological subtypes was 96.4% by Fisher discriminant analysis, and the weighted accuracy was 96.6%. For predicting diverse clinicopathological subtypes, the prediction accuracies ranged from 92 to 100%. According to the cross-validation, the overall accuracy of the model was 82.1%, and the accuracies of the model for predicting the luminal A, luminal B_HER2-, luminal B_HER2+, HER2 positive and triple negative subtypes were 79, 77, 88, 92 and 73%, respectively. According to the ROC analysis, the radiomic features had excellent performance in differentiating between different statuses of ER, PR, HER2 and Ki-67.

CONCLUSIONS

The Fisher discriminant analysis model based on radiomic features of diffusion-weighted MRI is a reliable method for the prediction of clinicopathological breast cancer subtypes.