Prognostic Significance of Tumor Regression Rate during Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervix Cancer: Analysis by Radiation Phase and Histologic Type

MRI-guided dynamic risk assessment in cervical cancer based on tumor hypoxia at diagnosis and volume response at brachytherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Improvements in treatment outcome for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) require a better classification of patients according to their risk of recurrence. We investigated whether an imaging-based approach, combining pretreatment hypoxia and tumor response during therapy, could improve risk classification.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ninety-three LACC patients with T2-weigthed (T2W)-, dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)- and diffusion weighted (DW)-magnetic resonance (MR) images acquired before treatment, and T2W- and, for 64 patients, DW-MR images, acquired at brachytherapy, were collected. Pretreatment hypoxic fraction (HFpre) was determined from DCE- and DW-MR images using the consumption and supply-based hypoxia (CSH)-imaging method. Volume regression at brachytherapy was assessed from T2W-MR images and combined with HFpre. In 17 patients with adequate DW-MR images at brachytherapy, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), reflecting tumor cell density, was calculated. Change in ADC during therapy was combined with volume regression yielding functional regression as explorative response measure. Endpoint was disease free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

HFpre was the strongest predictor of DFS, but a significant correlation with outcome was found also for volume regression. The combination of HFpre and volume regression showed a stronger association with DFS than HFpre alone. Patients with disease recurrence were selected to either the intermediate- or high-risk group with a 100 % accuracy. Functional regression showed a stronger correlation to HFpre than volume regression.

CONCLUSION

The combination of pretreatment hypoxia and volume regression at brachytherapy improved patient risk classification. Integration of ADC with volume regression showed promise as a new tumor response parameter.

The Role of Lymph Node Downstaging Following Neoadjuvant Treatment in a Group of Patients with Advanced Stage Cervical Cancer

Background and Objectives: Cervical cancer is the fourth most frequent type of neoplasia in women. It is most commonly caused by the persistent infection with high-risk strands of human papillomavirus (hrHPV). Its incidence increases rapidly from age 25 when routine HPV screening starts and then decreases at the age of 45. This reflects both the diagnosis of prevalent cases at first-time screening and the likely peak of HPV exposure in early adulthood. For early stages, the treatment offers the possibility of fertility preservation.. However, in more advanced stages, the treatment is restricted to concomitant chemo-radiotherapy, combined, in very selected cases with surgical intervention. After the neoadjuvant treatment, an imagistic re-evaluation of the patients is carried out to analyze if the stage of the disease remained the same or suffered a downstaging. Lymph node downstaging following neoadjuvant treatment is regarded as an indubitable prognostic factor for predicting disease recurrence and survival in patients with advanced cervical cancer. This study aims to ascertain the important survival role of radiotherapy in the downstaging of the disease and of lymphadenectomy in the control of lymph node invasion for patients with advanced-stage cervical cancer. Material and Methods: We describe the outcome of patients with cervical cancer in stage IIIC1 FIGO treated at Bucharest Oncological Institute. All patients received radiotherapy and two-thirds received concomitant chemotherapy. A surgical intervention consisting of type C radical hysterectomy with radical pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed six to eight weeks after the end of the neoadjuvant treatment. Results: The McNemar test demonstrated the regression of lymphadenopathies after neoadjuvant treatment-p: <0.001. However, the persistence of adenopathies was not related to the dose of irradiation (p: 0.61), the number of sessions of radiotherapy (p: 0.80), or the chemotherapy (p: 0.44). Also, there were no significant differences between the adenopathies reported by imagistic methods and those identified during surgical intervention-p: 0.62. The overall survival evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves is dependent on the post-radiotherapy FIGO stage-p: 0.002 and on the lymph node status evaluated during surgical intervention-p: 0.04. The risk factors associated with an increased risk of death were represented by a low preoperative hemoglobin level (p: 0.003) and by the advanced FIGO stage determined during surgical intervention (p-value: 0.006 for stage IIIA and 0.01 for stage IIIC1). In the multivariate Cox model, the independent predictor of survival was the preoperative hemoglobin level (p: 0.004, HR 0.535, CI: 0.347 to 0.823). Out of a total of 33 patients with neoadjuvant treatment, 22 survived until the end of the study, all 33 responded to the treatment in varying degrees, but in 3 of them, tumor cells were found in the lymph nodes during the intraoperative histopathological examination. Conclusions: For advanced cervical cancer patients, radical surgery after neoadjuvant treatment may be associated with a better survival rate. Further research is needed to identify all the causes that lead to the persistence of adenopathies in certain patients, to decrease the FIGO stage after surgical intervention, and, therefore, to lower the risk of death. Also, it is mandatory to correctly evaluate and treat the anemia, as it seems to be an independent predictor factor for mortality.

Disparities in Survival Outcomes Between Locally Advanced Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma Treated with Chemoradiotherapy

Purpose

To determine the disparities in survival outcomes between stage IIB-IVA cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Methods

Patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 were retrospectively included from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results databases. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used in this study. The primary endpoints were cervical cancer-specific survival (CCSS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 2752 patients were identified, including 87.5% (n=2408) were SCC and 12.5% (n=344) were AC. Patients with AC had inferior 5-year CCSS (67.5% vs 54.8%, P<0.001) and OS (58.4% vs 47.2%, P<0.001) compared to those with the SCC subtype. The hazard curve of cervical cancer-related death in AC peaked at 2 years (19%) and still small peaks in the 7 and 11 years of follow-up. Regarding SCC, cervical cancer-related deaths peaked at 2 years (15%) and the hazard rate was 2.0% during the six years of follow-up. The multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that histology was an independent prognostic factor associated with survival outcomes. Patients with AC had significantly poor CCSS (P<0.001) and OS (P<0.001). Similar results were found after PSM.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates a significantly better prognosis for cervical SCC patients compared to those with cervical AC undergoing chemoradiotherapy. These results highlight the importance of histological subtyping in predicting treatment outcomes and tailoring therapeutic strategies.

Overall survival and short-term efficacy analysis of cervical squamous cell carcinoma with skeletal muscle and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters

2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) can provide tumor biological metabolism and skeletal muscle composition information. The aim of this study was to evaluate overall survival (OS) and short-term efficacy of cervical squamous cell carcinoma combining tumor biological metabolism and skeletal muscle composition parameters. Eighty two patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma were included in the study, who received 18F-FDG PET/CT scans before treatment. Clinical characteristics, tumor biological metabolism parameters [standardized uptake value, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis, heterogeneity of tumors, etc.] and body composition parameters were recorded. The survival analysis of cervical squamous cell carcinoma patients was performed by univariate and multivariate analysis. A combined model included clinical indicators, tumor metabolism parameters and sarcopenia was constructed to evaluate OS of patients. According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1, the relationship between sarcopenia with tumor metabolism parameters and short-term efficacy was investigated in subgroup. The results indicate that sarcopenia and high value of the sum of MTV of lesions and metastases (MTVtotal) were poor prognostic factors in patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma. The combination of sarcopenia, MTVtotal and clinical factors provided an improved prediction of OS especially in the long term after treatment. Nutritional status of the patients and tumor metabolism may not affect the short-term efficacy of chemoradiotherapy in cervical squamous cell carcinoma patients.

ESGO/ESTRO quality indicators for radiation therapy of cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) has previously defined and established a list of quality indicators for the surgical treatment of cervical cancer. As a continuation of this effort to improve overall quality of care for cervical cancer patients across all aspects, ESGO and the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) initiated the development of quality indicators for radiation therapy of cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a list of quality indicators for radiation therapy of cervical cancer that can be used to audit and improve clinical practice by giving to practitioners and administrators a quantitative basis to improve care and organizational processes, notably for recognition of the increased complexity of modern external radiotherapy and brachytherapy techniques.

METHODS

Quality indicators were based on scientific evidence and/or expert consensus. The development process included a systematic literature search for identification of potential quality indicators and documentation of scientific evidence, consensus meetings of a group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large international panel of clinicians (n=99).

RESULTS

Using a structured format, each quality indicator has a description specifying what the indicator is measuring. Measurability specifications are detailed to define how the quality indicators will be measured in practice. Targets were also defined for specifying the level which each unit or center should be aiming to achieve. Nineteen structural, process, and outcome indicators were defined. Quality indicators 1-6 are general requirements related to pretreatment workup, time to treatment, upfront radiation therapy, and overall management, including active participation in clinical research and the decision making process within a structured multidisciplinary team. Quality indicators 7-17 are related to treatment indicators. Quality indicators 18 and 19 are related to patient outcomes.

DISCUSSION

This set of quality indicators is a major instrument to standardize the quality of radiation therapy in cervical cancer. A scoring system combining surgical and radiotherapeutic quality indicators will be developed within an envisaged future ESGO accreditation process for the overall management of cervical cancer, in an effort to support institutional and governmental quality assurance programs.

ESGO/ESTRO quality indicators for radiation therapy of cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) has previously defined and established a list of quality indicators for the surgical treatment of cervical cancer. As a continuation of this effort to improve overall quality of care for cervical cancer patients across all aspects, ESGO and the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) initiated the development of quality indicators for radiation therapy of cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a list of quality indicators for radiation therapy of cervical cancer that can be used to audit and improve clinical practice by giving to practitioners and administrators a quantitative basis to improve care and organizational processes, notably for recognition of the increased complexity of modern external radiotherapy and brachytherapy techniques.

METHODS

Quality indicators were based on scientific evidence and/or expert consensus. The development process included a systematic literature search for identification of potential quality indicators and documentation of scientific evidence, consensus meetings of a group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large international panel of clinicians (n = 99).

RESULTS

Using a structured format, each quality indicator has a description specifying what the indicator is measuring. Measurability specifications are detailed to define how the quality indicators will be measured in practice. Targets were also defined for specifying the level which each unit or center should be aiming to achieve. Nineteen structural, process, and outcome indicators were defined. Quality indicators 1-6 are general requirements related to pretreatment workup, time to treatment, upfront radiation therapy, and overall management, including active participation in clinical research and the decision making process within a structured multidisciplinary team. Quality indicators 7-17 are related to treatment indicators. Quality indicators 18 and 19 are related to patient outcomes.

DISCUSSION

This set of quality indicators is a major instrument to standardize the quality of radiation therapy in cervical cancer. A scoring system combining surgical and radiotherapeutic quality indicators will be developed within an envisaged future ESGO accreditation process for the overall management of cervical cancer, in an effort to support institutional and governmental quality assurance programs.

The Prognostic Value of Tumor Size, Volume and Tumor Volume Reduction Rate During Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Cervical Cancer

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between prognostic and tumor parameters of cervical cancer patients, such as tumor size (TS), tumor volume (TV), and tumor volume reduction rate (TVRR) after external beam radiotherapy.

Methods

A total of 217 patients with advanced cervical cancer, classified as Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) IIa–IVa, were enrolled in the study. Pre- and mid-RT pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed twice, during RT and just before brachytherapy.

Results

The median follow-up time was 51 months (range, 7–111 months). The 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local failure-free survival (LFFS) rates were 81.3, 85.1, and 92.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor parameters including FIGO stage >II (Hazard Ratio, 2.377 and 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.091–5.182; P = 0.029), pre-RT TV >61.6 cm³ (HR, 0.417 and 95% CI, 0.188–0.926; P = 0.032), and mid-RT TV >11.38 cm³ (HR, 3.192 and 95% CI, 1.094–9.316; P = 0.034) were observably associated with OS. Univariate analysis showed that the tumor volume reduction rate (TVRR) was dramatically associated with overall survival (HR, 0.204 and 95% CI 0.033–1.282; P <0.001) and local failure-free survival (P = 0.050).

Conclusions

In this retrospective study, TVRR and mid-radiotherapy tumor volume are independent and strong prognostic parameters for patients with local advanced cervical cancer receiving CCRT.

Analysis of Treatment Outcomes and Prognosis After Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

The aims of this study were to investigate the short-term and long-term efficacies and chronic radiotoxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) combined with image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) and identify prognostic factors in this patient population. The clinical data of 204 patients with cervical cancer who completed CCRT and subsequent brachytherapy in our hospital between February 2015 and March 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Short-term and long-term outcomes, chronic radiotoxicity, and prognostic factors were assessed. The median follow-up was 61.1 months. The short-term objective response (OR) rate was 85%. Lymph node metastasis before treatment was an independent predictor of OR (HR = 6.290, 95% CI: 2.211-17.897, p = 0.001). Fifty-two patients developed recurrence, with a median recurrence-free survival of 9.9 months (range, 2.4-52.2 months) and a post-recurrence survival of 12.1 months (range, 2.9-58.1 months). At 3 years, the cumulative incidence of overall recurrence was 26% (95% CI: 17-36). Multivariate analysis showed that Stage IIIB (HR = 2.332, 95% CI: 1.195-4.551, p = 0.013; reference, Stage IIB) and lymph node metastasis (HR = 4.462, 95% CI: 2.365-8.419, p < 0.001) were significant independent predictors of recurrence. Fifty-three patients developed chronic radiation proctitis (CRP). The incidence of severe CRP was approximately 5%, and the average rectal D2cm3 accumulation in patients with severe CRP was 73.4 Gy which is 3.9 Gy higher than that in patients without CRP (p = 0.013). At 4 years, the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival rates were 65% and 62%, respectively, and lymph node metastasis before treatment was an independent prognostic risk factor for OS. The short-term and long-term efficacies of CCRT combined with IGABT for the treatment of LACC patients were relatively satisfactory. However, the short-term and long-term efficacies of patients with lymph node metastasis before treatment were poor. For patients with lymph node metastasis before treatment, more active individualized treatment strategies should be adopted. When designing a radiotherapy plan, it is necessary to strictly limit the rectal D2cm3 accumulation to prevent serious CRP.

Comparison of platinum monotherapy with concurrent chemoradiation therapy versus platinum-based dual drug therapy with concurrent chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To compare the survival outcomes and adverse events of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) who received platinum monotherapy with concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) versus platinum-based dual drug therapy with CCRT.

Method

All relevant literature was screened form the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library and other databases from their establishment to October 2020. The main endpoint indicators included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Grade 3 and above adverse events induced by chemotherapy were also compared.

Results

This study involved 17 literature and 4,106 patients. There were 2,066 patients treated with CCRT with platinum-based dual drug therapy and 2,040 patients received CCRT with platinum monotherapy. Meta-analysis results showed that, compared to CCRT with platinum monotherapy, OS (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.58–0.79) and PFS (HR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.58–0.77) of LACC patients were significantly improved by CCRT with platinum-based dual drug therapy. In addition, CCRT with platinum-based dual drug therapy led to more adverse reactions such as neutropenia (OR = 4.92, 95% CI 3.55–6.84), anemia (OR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.17–3.39), diarrhea (OR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.30–2.22), leukopenia (OR = 2.42, 95%CI 1.84–3.17), thrombocytopenia (OR = 2.87, 95%CI 1.44–5.72), etc.

Conclusion

CCRT with platinum-based dual drug therapy improved OS and PFS of LACC patients relative to the CCRT with platinum monotherapy. But it also increased the adverse reactions caused by multiple chemotherapy drugs. Thus, it is crucial to select a proper chemotherapy regimen based on the actual tolerance of patients in clinical practice.

Survival of Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Definitive Radiotherapy or Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy According to Histological Subtype: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Cervical cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality for women worldwide. Different histopathological cervical cancer subtypes (i.e., adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma) are all treated similarly with definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy, but studies have reported differing survival prognoses. In this review and meta-analysis, we compared the disease-free and overall survivals of patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy according to the histopathological subtypes.

Objective

To compare the disease-free and overall survivals of patients with adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma cervical cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Methods

We systematically searched the Web of Science, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, and MEDLINE academic databases following PRISMA guidelines. We identified publications to conduct a random-effects meta-analysis to evaluate the disease-free and overall survivals of patients with cervical adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Results

From 963 studies, we found eight eligible ones with 13,859 patients with cervical cancer (mean age, 52.2 ± 7.9 years). Our meta-analysis revealed a poorer outcome of disease-free (hazard ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.28–1.79) and overall (hazard ratio 1.41; 95% CI, 1.26–1.57) survivals for patients with adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma undergoing definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy than for those with squamous cell carcinoma undergoing similar treatments. We also observed that larger tumor size and advanced tumor stage are also significant prognostic factors that adversely impact survival outcomes in cervical cancer patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Conclusion

Our results show poor disease-free and overall survivals for patients with cervical cancer and adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma than for those with squamous cell carcinoma after treatment with definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Our findings clarify the risks associated with the conventional management of cervical cancer according to the histological type.