The Impact of Physical Activity on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: treatment outcomes, quality of life and implications for practice

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most common spinal disorder among children and adolescents, with most cases being diagnosed around puberty. While the majority of people with AIS do not undergo treatment, a small but significant number are treated, depending on the extent of their spinal curvature. Treatment typically involves bracing, which requires substantial adherence, and/or surgery, which is invasive and permanent. Furthermore, decisions about treatment often need to be made at a critical stage of the person's development. This article examines the evidence on AIS and its treatment, synthesising the current literature and drawing from the authors' empirical work to explore the clinical outcomes of bracing and surgery, as well as the longer-term effects on people's quality of life. Drawing from this evidence, the authors provide guidance for nurses and healthcare professionals who care for people with AIS.

Assessment of the Efficacy of Low-Density Pedicle Screw Construction Correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Prospective Single-Center Study

Background Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) poses physical and psychological challenges for affected individuals, necessitating effective and less invasive treatment approaches. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of low-density posterior pedicle screw fixation in AIS correction, exploring its impact on deformity parameters, patient quality of life, and potential complications. Methodology A prospective study involving 20 AIS patients, employing low-density pedicle screw fixation, was conducted. Clinical, radiological, and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22) outcomes were assessed. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 26 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results Significant reductions in major and minor curve Cobb angles were observed (mean major curve reduction: 79.14%, p < 0.001; mean minor curve reduction: 68.91%, p < 0.001), indicating substantial deformity correction. As measured by the SRS-22 questionnaire, quality of life showed noteworthy improvements (mean pain score increase: 0.54, p < 0.05; mean self-image score increase: 1.22, p < 0.01), reflecting enhanced patient satisfaction and well-being. Complications were documented in four (20%) cases, including infection, adding-on phenomenon, proximal junctional kyphosis, and thoracic hypokyphosis. Conclusions Our study highlights the efficacy of low-density pedicle screw constructs in AIS correction. Significant deformity reductions and improved quality of life underscore the success of the approach. However, long-term studies with larger cohorts are crucial for confirming durability.