Time from Symptom Onset to Diagnosis and Treatment among Haematological Malignancies: Influencing Factors and Associated Negative Outcomes

Self-Medication during and after Cancer: A French Nation-Wide Cross-Sectional Study

(1) Background: Little data are available in Western countries regarding self-medication practices in the context of cancer. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of self-medication practices during (cancer patients) and after cancer (cancer survivors). (2) Methods: This multicenter, cross-sectional, and online study was designed to assess self-medication prevalence. Other objectives were explored, notably the medication types, the perceived risks, and the relation with symptoms and quality of life. (3) Results: Among the 518 patients analyzed, 56.4% declared they practiced self-medication. Dietary supplements and pain medications were used by more than half of the patients. Self-medication was practiced in order to manage the adverse effects of anticancer therapies (63.8%), for which pain was the leading indication (39%), and to improve the efficacy of anticancer therapies (43.8%, cancer patients). Patients believed that self-medication could not lead to drug interactions with anticancer therapies (84.9%, cancer patients), or to adverse effects (84.6%, cancer patients and survivors). Self-medication practices were associated with altered social functioning, pain, insomnia, and financial difficulties. (4) Conclusions: Self-medication was performed by more than half of the responders (ongoing or past cancer) and could be a marker of the undermanagement of cancer and treatment-related adverse effects.

What causes delays in diagnosing blood cancers? A rapid review of the evidence

OBJECTIVE

We undertook a rapid review of literature relating to the diagnosis of blood cancers, to find out what factors contribute to delays in diagnosis, including symptom recognition, appraisal and help-seeking behaviours.

METHODS

We used rapid review methodology following Tricco et al. to synthesise current literature from two electronic databases. We searched for studies about symptom appraisal help-seeking for all blood cancers published between 2001 and 2021, written in English.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included in the review, of which 10 were published in the United Kingdom. We found a number of factors associated with delays in blood cancer diagnosis. These included patient factors such as gender, age and ethnicity, as well as health system factors such as poor communication and seeing a locum clinician in primary care. A narrative synthesis of the evidence produced four types of symptom interpretation by patients: (1) symptoms compatible with normal state of health, (2) event-linked problems, (3) mild or chronic illness and (4) non-specific unwell state. These four interpretations were linked to different help-seeking behaviours. After seeking help, patients often experienced delays due to healthcare professionals' (HCPs') non-serious interpretation of symptoms, misleading blood tests, discontinuity of care and other barriers in the diagnostic pathway.

CONCLUSION

Blood cancers are difficult to diagnose due to non-specific heterogeneous symptoms, and this is reflected in how those symptoms are interpreted by patients and managed by HCPs. It is important to understand how different interpretations affect delays in help-seeking, and what HCPs can do to support timely follow-up for patients.

Primary Soft-Tissue Lymphomas: MRI Features Help Discriminate From Other Soft-Tissue Tumors

OBJECTIVES

MRI presentation of extra-nodal soft-tissue lymphomas (STLs) is scarcely reported and lacks of comparison with other soft-tissue tumors (STTs) including sarcomas (STS). Yet, suggesting this diagnosis on MRI would considerably reduce diagnostic intervals. Our aim was to investigate if conventional MRI could discriminate STLs from other STTs.

METHODS

MRIs of STL patients were compared with those of patients addressed to a sarcoma reference center for the diagnosis of a STT. MRI characteristics depicting the tumor (size, signal, habitats, shape, surrounding tissues) were reported. Uni- and multivariate associations with STL diagnosis were evaluated in the entire cohort, and in the subgroups of benign and malignant STTs patients. Diagnostic performances of MRI features combinations were tested.

RESULTS

We included 39 patients with STLs (median age: 69 years) and 368 patients with other STTs (122 benign STTs and 246 STS; median age: 58 years). Six MRI features were independent predictors of STL compared to all other STTs: intermediate SI on T1-WI, homogeneous enhancement (without necrotic areas), no blood signal, no fibrotic signal, no peritumoral enhancement and lack of abnormal intra- and peritumoral vasculature (p-value range: <0.0001-0.0163). Their simultaneous presence had a sensitivity of 0.88 (0.71-0.96) and a specificity of 0.88 (0.84-0.91). Other relevant MRI features were: no fat signal to discriminate against STS (p = 0.0409), the infiltrative growth pattern and the vessel and nerve encasement to discriminate against benign STTs (p = 0.0016 and 0.0011, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our research demonstrates that conventional MRI can help discriminating STLs from other STTs. Indeed, radiologists can help suggesting the possible diagnosis of STL, which could speed-up the subsequent proper histopathological analysis in light of MRI findings.

Haematological malignancies implications during the times of the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has complicated current healthcare services for cancer patients. Patients with haematological malignancies specifically seem vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection due to their immunosuppressed status. The COVID-19 pandemic influences every step of the assessment and treatment of a haematological malignancy. Clinicians must adhere to strict policies to not spread the virus to their patients while they must also adjust their workflow for maximum productivity. These difficulties accentuate the ever-present need to improve the healthcare services for cancer patients. This improvement is needed not only to combat the problems that arose from the COVID-19 pandemic but also to establish a framework for the management of patients with haematological malignancies in potential future pandemics.