Screening for Gestational Diabetes during the COVID-19 Pandemic-Current Recommendations and Their Consequences

Comparing the screening methods for gestational diabetes mellitus before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is the gold standard for detecting gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, screening practices were reevaluated due to the risk of infection associated with the prolonged hospital visit required for the OGTT. Some countries have published novel screening protocols for GDM, suggesting the utilization of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), random plasma glucose (RPG), or fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in favor of OGTTs during the pandemic. Therefore, differences in screening methods before and after the epidemic need to be examined.

METHODS

A systematic search was carried out across five electronic databases (Cinahl, Medline, Embase, Pubmed, and Web of Science) between 2016 and 2023. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist for cohort studies was used to evaluate the quality of included papers.

RESULTS

A total of 13 eligible studies were included. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the OGTT was the recommended measure to screen GDM, internationally based on various official guidelines. During the pandemic, it was recommended that HbA1c or FPG, or RPG be used as a substitute for OGTTs. However, the new methods have low sensitivity, may not reflect accurately the prevalence of GDM, and may lead to many false-negative results in women and to adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The new screening methods for GDM have poor accuracy and a high risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Comparatively, targeted screening tests to detect GDM according to the risk level are more effective in an emergency. In the future, the alternatives to OGTTs still need to be further explored in more depth.

Impact of a modified screening approach during the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis and outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus: A population-level analysis of 90,518 pregnant women

AIMS

To provide real-world evidence on the uptake of and outcomes associated with the modified gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening approach offered during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with the standard screening approach.

METHODS

All pregnancies between 01 January 2020 and 31 December 2021, in Alberta, Canada, were included in the study. We examined GDM screening and diagnosis rates, and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) outcomes.

RESULTS

Annual GDM screening rates were > 95% during the study time period. Overall, 84.7%, and 11.6% of the 92,505 pregnancies underwent standard and modified screening for GDM, respectively. The use of modified screening was the highest among deliveries in August 2020 (49.8%) which corresponded to the early first wave of the pandemic. GDM diagnosis rate was lower in the modified screening (7.4%) than in the standard screening (12.3%, p < 0.001) group. The LGA rates in the modified screening with GDM and the standard screening with GDM groups were 24.8% and 12.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). Women in the modified screening with GDM group were at a higher risk of having an LGA infant (adjusted odds ratio: 3.46; 95% confidence interval: 2.93, 4.08) compared to the standard screening with no GDM group.

CONCLUSIONS

The COVID-19 epidemic had no impact on screening for GDM. Women who underwent modified screening, based on HbA1c/random plasma glucose, had lower rates of GDM cases.

Pregnancy-Related Complications During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Iran

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected healthcare systems worldwide, with significant collateral damage to vulnerable populations, including the perinatal population. This study sought to compare pregnancy-related complications before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran.

METHODS

This retrospective data analysis was performed from February 20 to August 20, 2019 (prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic) and from February 20 to August 20, 2020 (during the pandemic), encompassing the initial wave of the pandemic and the subsequent lockdown. To collect data, we utilized the medical records of 168,358 women obtained from the Iranian Maternal and Neonatal Network, which is a comprehensive electronic health record database management system specifically designed to store information pertaining to maternal and neonatal health.

RESULTS

A total of 168,358 medical records were analyzed, with 87388 (51.9%) and 80970 (48.1%) before and during the pandemic, respectively. The occurrence of pregnancy complications was found to be significantly more frequent during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period. Notably, there was a higher likelihood of experiencing preeclampsia (odds ratio [OR]=1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07‒1.22, P=0.0001) and gestational diabetes (OR=1.14, 95% CI: 1.09‒1.19, P=0.0001) during the pandemic. Furthermore, cesarean section (CS) became more prevalent during the pandemic in comparison to vaginal delivery (OR=1.19, 95% CI: 1.17‒-1.22, P=0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrated a significant association between the COVID-19 pandemic and an escalation in adverse pregnancy outcomes, notably preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and CS deliveries. However, further research is warranted to gain a richer understanding of the intricate interplay between the COVID-19 pandemic and pregnancy complications. This is particularly crucial in light of the evolving landscape of new coronavirus variants.

Association of Early Pregnancy Values of Glycosylated Hemoglobin and the Development of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Introduction There is no consensus regarding screening and diagnostic methods for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The present study aimed to evaluate the association between early pregnancy values of glycosylated hemoglobin and the development of gestational diabetes mellitus among pregnant women in a tertiary care hospital in eastern India. Methods The prospective cohort study included 200 pregnant women aged between 18 and 35 years in their first trimester (gestational age eight to 13 weeks) attending the antenatal clinics of the study hospital. A glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) test and a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) test were done in all study participants in their first trimester. Pregnant women with HbA1c ≥6.5% and OGTT ≥140 mg/dl were excluded from the study. In other women, the second trimester (24-28 weeks) and the third trimester OGTT (32-34 weeks) were done to detect gestational diabetes mellitus. Data collection was initiated after the approval of the Information, Education, and Communication (IEC) and relevant authorities. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was done to identify the cut-off value of HbA1c that predicted the development of GDM. Results The incidence of GDM was 33% among our study participants. The mean HbA1c was significantly higher among women who had GDM (5.4 ± 0.4%) as compared to those who did not develop GDM (4.9 ± 0.2%) (p<0.001). On ROC analysis of HbA1c values to predict the development of GDM, a cut-off value of HbA1c ≥5.25%, irrespective of risk status, was calculated to have 84.8% sensitivity and 62.7% specificity, and among the high-risk group, HbA1c ≥5.15% had 83.3% sensitivity and 97% specificity in predicting GDM. On stratified analysis, a moderately strong positive correlation was demonstrated between HbA1c values and OGTT in the second trimester in both high-risk and low-risk cohorts (p<0.05). Conclusion Based on the findings of the present study, HbA1c can be proposed to be a suitable biomarker for GDM prediction, probably not independently but rather as a component of a multi-marker approach for high- and low-risk pregnant groups.

Gestational diabetes mellitus and COVID-19: The epidemic during the pandemic

During the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, people worldwide have experienced an unprecedented rise in psychological distress and anxiety. In addition to this challenging situation, the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM), a hidden epidemic, has been steadily increasing in recent years. Lower-middle-income countries have faced significant barriers in providing accessible prenatal care and promoting a healthy diet for pregnant women, and the pandemic has made these challenges even more difficult to overcome. Pregnant women are at a higher risk of developing complications such as hyper-tension, preeclampsia, and gestational diabetes, all of which can have adverse implications for both maternal and fetal health. The occurrence of gestational diabetes has been on the rise, and it is possible that the pandemic has worsened its prevalence. Although data is limited, studies conducted in Italy and Canada suggest that the pandemic has had an impact on gestational diabetes rates, especially among women in their first trimester of pregnancy. The significant disruptions to daily routines caused by the pandemic, such as limited exercise options, indicate a possible link between COVID-19 and an increased likelihood of experiencing higher levels of weight gain during pregnancy. Notably, individuals in the United States with singleton pregnancies are at a significantly higher risk of excessive gestational weight gain, making this association particularly important to consider. Although comprehensive data is currently lacking, it is important for clinical researchers to explore the possibility of establishing correlations between the stress experienced during the pandemic, its consequences such as gestational gain weight, and the increasing incidence of gestational DM. This knowledge would contribute to better preventive measures and support for pregnant individuals during challenging times.

Clinicians' perspectives on gestational diabetes screening during the global COVID-19 pandemic in Australia

AIM

There is no international consensus for the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). In March 2020, modified screening and diagnostic recommendations were rapidly implemented in Queensland, Australia, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. How clinicians perceived and used these changes can provide insights to support high-quality clinical practice and provide lessons for future policy changes. The aim of this study was to understand clinicians' perceptions and use of COVID-19 changes to GDM screening and diagnostic recommendations.

METHODS

Queensland healthcare professionals responsible for diagnosing or caring for women with GDM were recruited for semi-structured telephone interviews. Data analysis of transcribed interviews used inductive reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Seventeen interviews were conducted with the following participants: six midwives/nurses, three endocrinologists, two general practitioners, two general practitioners/obstetricians, two diabetes educators, one dietitian and one obstetrician. Three themes emerged: communication and implementation, perceptions and value of evidence and diversity in perceptions of GDM screening. Overall, clinicians welcomed the rapid changes during the initial uncertainty of the pandemic, but as COVID-19 became less of a threat to the Queensland healthcare system, some questioned the underlying evidence base. In areas where GDM was more prevalent, clinicians more frequently worried about missed diagnoses, whereas others who felt that overdiagnosis had occurred in the past continued to support the changes.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the challenges to changing policy when clinicians have diverse (and often strongly held) views.

Postpartum Glucose Tolerance Testing Among Patients With Gestational Diabetes During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic

Introduction The impact of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) COVID-19 pandemic on the care of pregnant patients with gestational diabetes (GDM) is largely unreported. The objective of this study was to compare the completion of postpartum oral glucose tolerance testing (GTT) prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic among patients with GDM. Methods This was a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with GDM between April 2019 and March 2021. Medical records of patients diagnosed with GDM prior to and during the pandemic were compared. The primary outcome was the difference in the completion of postpartum GTT prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Completion was defined as testing between four weeks to six months postpartum. Secondary objectives were: 1) to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes prior to and during the pandemic among patients with GDM, and 2) to compare pregnancy characteristics and outcomes by compliance with postpartum GTT. Results There were 185 patients included in the study, of whom 83 (44.9%) delivered prior to the pandemic and 102 (55.1%) delivered during the pandemic. There was no difference in completion of postpartum diabetes testing prior, compared to during the pandemic (27.7% vs 33.3%, p=0.47). Postpartum diagnosis of pre-diabetes and type two diabetes mellitus (T2DM) did not differ between groups (p=0.36 and p=1.00, respectively). Patients who completed postpartum testing were less likely to have preeclampsia with severe features compared to patients who did not (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.96, p=0.02). Conclusion Completion of postpartum testing for T2DM remained poor prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings underscore the need for the adoption of more accessible methods of postpartum testing for T2DM among patients with GDM.

A Review on the Use of Metformin in Pregnancy and Its Associated Fetal Outcomes

A commonly used first-line anti-diabetic medication, metformin, has been used in pregnancy. The drug is known to have specific effects on different organs around the body. One of these organs includes the ovaries. Therefore, for more than 40 years, it has often been prescribed for maternal obesity along with gestational diabetes mellitus. Untreated pregnancies like these frequently result in complications for both the mother and the fetus, like macrosomia, pregnancy-induced hypertension, obstructed labor, stillbirths, and perinatal deaths. In addition, there is also evidence that these mothers tend to develop type II diabetes mellitus during their pregnancy and even a few years post-delivery. These complications can be controlled or even reduced with the help of metformin, sometimes combining it with insulin or clomiphene citrate if required. There is still a need to cautiously prescribe the drug by outweighing its benefits against the risk associated with it. The current research on the subject leans more towards the benefits offered to the mother during pregnancy. Only a few randomized, controlled trials have been conducted on the fetal condition after the mother has been administered metformin.

Furthermore, these studies lack the appropriate sample size and long-term follow-up on these metformin-exposed offspring. As a result, there are no reliable data available to clinicians and physicians about the drug. Owing to its benefits in certain pregnancies, it is less likely that the drug will cease to be prescribed. Therefore, it becomes increasingly imperative to conduct more research on this topic to ensure the drug is safe for the mother and the offspring.

Analysis of Maternal and Neonatal Complications in a Group of Patients with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Background and Objectives: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) represents one of the most common complications during pregnancy, being associated with numerous maternal and neonatal complications. The study aimed to analyze maternal and neonatal complications associated with GDM. The risk factors of GDM and of the maternal and neonatal complications were studied in order to prevent their occurrence. Materials and Methods: The study included 97 women in the study, who underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) between weeks 24–28 of pregnancy, consequently being divided into two groups: pregnant women with and without GDM. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 26.0 software and MATLAB fitglm, the results being considered statistically significant if p < 0.05. Results: We observed statistically significant differences between the group of women with and without GDM, regarding gestational hypertension (17.6% vs. 0%), preeclampsia (13.72% vs. 0%), and cesarean delivery (96.1% vs. 78,3%). Data on the newborn and neonatal complications: statistically significant differences were recorded between the two groups (GDM vs. no GDM) regarding the average weight at birth (3339.41 ± 658.12 g vs. 3122.83 ± 173.67 g), presence of large for gestational age (21.6% vs. 0%), macrosomia (13.7% vs. 0%), excessive fetal growth (35.3% vs. 0%), respiratory distress (31.4% vs. 0%), hospitalization for at least 24 h in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (9.80% vs. 0%), and APGAR score <7 both 1 and 5 min following birth (7.8% vs. 0%). Additionally, the frequency of neonatal hypoglycemia and hyperbilirubinemia was higher among newborns from mothers with GDM. Conclusions: The screening and diagnosis of GDM is vital, and appropriate management is required for the prevention of maternal and neonatal complications associated with GDM. It is also important to know the risk factors for GDM and attempt to prevent their appearance.

SARS-CoV-2 in diabetic pregnancies: a systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND

Currently, we suffer from an increasing diabetes pandemic and on the other hand from the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Already at the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, it was quickly assumed that certain groups are at increased risk to suffer from a severe course of COVID-19. There are serious concerns regarding potential adverse effects on maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes. Diabetic pregnancies clearly need special care, but clinical implications as well as the complex interplay of diabetes and SARS-CoV-2 are currently unknown. We summarized the evidence on SARS-CoV-2 in diabetic pregnancies, including the identification of novel potential pathophysiological mechanisms and interactions as well as clinical outcomes and features, screening, and management approaches.

METHODS

We carried out a systematic scoping review in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science Core Collection in September 2020.

RESULTS

We found that the prognosis of pregnant women with diabetes mellitus and COVID-19 may be associated with potential underlying mechanisms such as a simplified viral uptake by ACE2, a higher basal value of pro-inflammatory cytokines, being hypoxemic as well as platelet activation, embolism, and preeclampsia. In the context of "trans-generational programming" and COVID-19, life-long consequences may be "programmed" during gestation by pro-inflammation, hypoxia, over- or under-expression of transporters and enzymes, and epigenetic modifications based on changes in the intra-uterine milieu. COVID-19 may cause new onset diabetes mellitus, and that vertical transmission from mother to baby might be possible.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the challenges in clinical management, the complex interplay between COVID-19 and diabetic pregnancies, evidence-based recommendations are urgently needed. Digital medicine is a future-oriented and effective approach in the context of clinical diabetes management. We anticipate our review to be a starting point to understand and analyze mechanisms and epidemiology to most effectively treat women with SARS-COV-2 and diabetes in pregnancy.

Clinical practice recommendations for the detection and management of hyperglycemia in pregnancy from South Asia, Africa and Mexico during COVID-19 pandemic

The human coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected overall healthcare delivery, including prenatal, antenatal and postnatal care. Hyperglycemia in pregnancy (HIP) is the most common medical condition encountered during pregnancy. There is little guidance for primary care physicians for providing delivery of optimal perinatal care while minimizing the risk of COVID-19 infection in pregnant women. This review aims to describe pragmatic modifications in the screening, detection and management of HIP during the COVID- 19 pandemic. In this review, articles published up to June 2021 were searched on multiple databases, including PubMed, Medline, EMBASE and ScienceDirect. Direct online searches were conducted to identify national and international guidelines. Search criteria included terms to extract articles describing HIP with and/or without COVID-19 between 1^st March 2020 and 15^th June 2021. Fasting plasma glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and random plasma glucose could be alternative screening strategies for gestational diabetes mellitus screening (at 24–28 weeks of gestation), instead of the traditional 2 h oral glucose tolerance test. The use of telemedicine for the management of HIP is recommended. Hospital visits should be scheduled to coincide with obstetric and ultrasound visits. COVID-19 infected pregnant women with HIP need enhanced maternal and fetal vigilance, optimal diabetes care and psychological support in addition to supportive measures. This article presents pragmatic options and approaches for primary care physicians, diabetes care providers and obstetricians for GDM screening, diagnosis and management during the pandemic, to be used in conjunction with routine antenatal care.