Shall We Focus on the Eosinophil to Guide Treatment with Systemic Corticosteroids during Acute Exacerbations of COPD?: PRO

International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Allergic rhinitis - 2023

BACKGROUND

In the 5 years that have passed since the publication of the 2018 International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2018), the literature has expanded substantially. The ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update presents 144 individual topics on allergic rhinitis (AR), expanded by over 40 topics from the 2018 document. Originally presented topics from 2018 have also been reviewed and updated. The executive summary highlights key evidence-based findings and recommendation from the full document.

METHODS

ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 employed established evidence-based review with recommendation (EBRR) methodology to individually evaluate each topic. Stepwise iterative peer review and consensus was performed for each topic. The final document was then collated and includes the results of this work.

RESULTS

ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 includes 10 major content areas and 144 individual topics related to AR. For a substantial proportion of topics included, an aggregate grade of evidence is presented, which is determined by collating the levels of evidence for each available study identified in the literature. For topics in which a diagnostic or therapeutic intervention is considered, a recommendation summary is presented, which considers the aggregate grade of evidence, benefit, harm, and cost.

CONCLUSION

The ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update provides a comprehensive evaluation of AR and the currently available evidence. It is this evidence that contributes to our current knowledge base and recommendations for patient evaluation and treatment.

Using Blood Eosinophil Count as a Biomarker to Guide Corticosteroid Treatment for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Treating patients hospitalised with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) usually involves administering systemic corticosteroids. The many unwanted side effects associated with this treatment have led to increased interest in minimising the accumulated corticosteroid dose necessary to treat exacerbations. Studies have shown that short-term treatment with corticosteroids is preferred, and recent trials have shown that biomarkers can be used to further reduce exposure to corticosteroids. Interestingly, high eosinophil counts in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD are indicative of an eosinophilic phenotype with a distinct response to treatment with corticosteroids. In addition, post-hoc analysis of randomised control trials have shown that higher blood eosinophil counts at the start of the study predict a greater response to inhaled corticosteroids in stable COPD. In this review, we examine the studies on this topic, describe how blood eosinophil cell count may be used as a biomarker to guide treatment with corticosteroids, and identify some relevant challenges.

Role of peripheral eosinophilia in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Eosinophil counts are a promising guide to systemic steroid administration for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

AIM

To study the role of peripheral eosinophilia in hospitalized patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD).

METHODS

From January 2014 to May 2017, patients with AECOPD hospitalized in Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital were retrospectively stratified into two groups according to their peripheral eosinophil count: The EOS group (eosinophil count ≥ 2%) and the non-EOS group (eosinophil count < 2%). Demographics, comorbidities, laboratory data, steroid use, length of hospital stay, and COPD-related readmissions were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 625 patients were recruited, with 176 patients (28.2%) in the EOS group. The EOS group showed a lower prevalence of infection, lower cumulative doses of prednisolone equivalents, shorter length of hospital stay, and higher number of COPD-related readmissions than the non-EOS group. There were significantly linear correlations between eosinophil percentage and number of readmissions and between eosinophil percentage and length of hospital stay (P < 0.001, Pearson's r = 0.147; P = 0.031, Pearson's r = -0.086, respectively). The EOS group and a lower percent-predicted value of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were associated with shorter time to first COPD-related readmission [adjusted hazard ratio (adj. HR) = 1.488, P < 0.001; adj. HR = 0.985, P < 0.001, respectively].

CONCLUSION

The study findings suggest that the EOS group had the features of a shorter length of hospital stay, and lower doses of systemic steroids, but more frequent readmissions. The EOS group and lower percent-predicted FEV1 values were risk factors for shorter time to first COPD-related readmission.

Bronchial mucosal inflammation and illness severity in response to experimental rhinovirus infection in COPD

Background

Respiratory viral infection causes chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. We previously reported increased bronchial mucosa eosinophil and neutrophil inflammation in patients with COPD experiencing naturally occurring exacerbations. But it is unclear whether virus per se induces bronchial mucosal inflammation, nor whether this relates to exacerbation severity.

Objectives

We sought to determine the extent and nature of bronchial mucosal inflammation following experimental rhinovirus (RV)-16–induced COPD exacerbations and its relationship to disease severity.

Methods

Bronchial mucosal inflammatory cell phenotypes were determined at preinfection baseline and following experimental RV infection in 17 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage II subjects with COPD and as controls 20 smokers and 11 nonsmokers with normal lung function. No subject had a history of asthma/allergic rhinitis: all had negative results for aeroallergen skin prick tests.

Results

RV infection increased the numbers of bronchial mucosal eosinophils and neutrophils only in COPD and CD8⁺ T lymphocytes in patients with COPD and nonsmokers. Monocytes/macrophages, CD4⁺ T lymphocytes, and CD20⁺ B lymphocytes were increased in all subjects. At baseline, compared with nonsmokers, subjects with COPD and smokers had increased numbers of bronchial mucosal monocytes/macrophages and CD8⁺ T lymphocytes but fewer numbers of CD4⁺ T lymphocytes and CD20⁺ B lymphocytes. The virus-induced inflammatory cells in patients with COPD were positively associated with virus load, illness severity, and reductions in lung function.

Conclusions

Experimental RV infection induces bronchial mucosal eosinophilia and neutrophilia only in patients with COPD and monocytes/macrophages and lymphocytes in both patients with COPD and control subjects. The virus-induced inflammatory cell phenotypes observed in COPD positively related to virus load and illness severity. Antiviral/anti-inflammatory therapies could attenuate bronchial inflammation and ameliorate virus-induced COPD exacerbations.

Phase II Study of Single/Repeated Doses of Acumapimod (BCT197) to Treat Acute Exacerbations of COPD

Mitogen-activated protein kinase p38 is a key regulator in the inflammation pathway and is activated in the lungs of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Acumapimod is a potent, selective, oral, p38 inhibitor under investigation for treatment of acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD). In this Phase II, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled dose-exploration study of acumapimod in patients with moderate or severe AECOPD (NCT01332097), patients presenting with AECOPD were randomized to receive single-dose acumapimod (20 mg or 75 mg) on Day 1, repeated single-dose acumapimod (20 mg or 75 mg) on Days 1 and 6, oral prednisone 40 mg (10 days), or placebo. Primary outcome: improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) versus placebo at Day 5 (single doses) and Day 10 (repeated doses). N = 183 patients were randomized; 169 (92%) patients completed the study. Although the primary endpoint (FEV₁ at Day 10) was not met (p = 0.082), there was a significant improvement in FEV₁ with acumapimod repeat-dose 75 mg versus placebo at Day 8 (p = 0.022) which, though not a prespecified endpoint, was part of an overall trend. Differences at lower doses did not achieve significance. Mean change in FEV₁ AUC from baseline to Day 14 in the 75 mg repeat-dose group was significantly higher versus placebo (p = 0.02), prednisone (p = 0.01), and 20 mg single-dose groups (p = 0.015) (post-hoc analysis). EXACT-PRO showed numerical differences versus placebo that did not reach significance. Acumapimod was well tolerated. In conclusion, repeated single-dose acumapimod showed a clinically relevant improvement in FEV₁ over placebo at Day 8, along with consistent numerical differences in EXACT-PRO. These data can be used to determine dose regimens for a proof-of-clinical-concept trial.