Epstein-Barr Virus LMP1 Induces Soluble PD-L1 in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Metabolic regulation of the tumour and its microenvironment: The role of Epstein-Barr virus

The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), the first identified human tumour virus, infects over 95% of the individuals globally and has the potential to induce different types of cancers. It is increasingly recognised that EBV infection not only alters cellular metabolism, contributing to neoplastic transformation, but also utilises several non-cell autonomous mechanisms to shape the metabolic milieu in the tumour microenvironment (TME) and its constituent stromal and immune cells. In this review, we explore how EBV modulates metabolism to shape the interactions between cancer cells, stromal cells, and immune cells within a hypoxic and acidic TME. We highlight how metabolites resulting from EBV infection act as paracrine factors to regulate the TME, and how targeting them can disrupt barriers to immunotherapy.

Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) Latent Membrane Protein 1 (LMP-1) Regulates Functional Markers in Intermediate and Non-Classical Monocytes

Background: The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infects more than 90 percent of the human population. In pediatric patients, the innate immune response against EBV primary infection plays a key role. Monocytes and macrophages can have distinct functions depending on the microenvironment surrounding them. At least three monocyte subpopulations can be differentiated depending on membrane protein expression: classical (C, CD14++CD16-), intermediate (I, CD14++CD16+), and non-classical (NC, CD14+CD16++). They also modulate T and B lymphocyte activation/inhibition through the expression of costimulatory molecules such as CD80, CD86, and PD-L1. Yet, little is known about monocytes' role in EBV infection. Methods: Peripheral blood and tonsil biopsies of EBV primary infected (PI) patients, healthy carriers (HCs), and patients undergoing reactivation (R) were studied. Results: Classical monocytes prevailed in all infectious statuses. Tonsillar CD163 positively correlated with CD163 expression in NC monocytes in HCs. PD-L1+ cells in the tonsil positively correlated with PD-L1 expression in NC monocytes. LMP-1 viral latent protein presented a positive correlation with PD-L1, CD163, and CD206 expression in the NC subpopulation. Conclusions: Our results evidence the predominant role of I and NC monocytes' response against EBV infection. Furthermore, the viral oncoprotein LMP-1 could be involved in the expression of regulatory proteins in I and NC monocytes.

Targeting the LMP1-ALIX axis in EBV+ nasopharyngeal carcinoma inhibits immunosuppressive small extracellular vesicle secretion and boosts anti-tumor immunity

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the therapeutical regimen for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), yet its response rate remains insufficient. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) mediates local and peripheral immunosuppression in tumors, and the mechanism of PD-L1 loading into these vesicles is garnering increasing attention. Latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1), a key viral oncoprotein expressed in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive NPC, contributes to remodeling the tumor microenvironment. However, the precise mechanisms by which LMP1 modulates tumor immunity in NPC remain unclear. Here, we aimed to investigate the roles and regulatory mechanisms of LMP1 and sEV PD-L1 in NPC immune evasion.

METHODS

We analyzed the impact of LMP1 on tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte abundance in NPC tissues and humanized tumor-bearing mouse models using multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) and flow cytometry, respectively. Transmission electron microscopy and nanoparticle tracking analysis were employed to characterize sEVs. Immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry was utilized to identify proteins interacting with LMP1. The regulatory effects of sEVs on tumor microenvironment were assessed by monitoring CD8+ T cell proliferation and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) expression via flow cytometry. Furthermore, the expression patterns of LMP1 and downstream regulators in NPC were analyzed using mIF and survival analysis.

RESULTS

High LMP1 expression in NPC patient specimens and mouse models was associated with restricted infiltration of CD8+ T cells. Additionally, LMP1 promoted sEV PD-L1 secretion, leading to inhibition of CD8+ T cell viability and IFN-γ expression in vitro. Mechanistically, LMP1 recruited apoptosis-linked gene 2-interacting protein X (ALIX) through its intracellular domain and bound PD-L1 through its transmembrane domain, thereby facilitating the loading of PD-L1 into ALIX-dependent sEVs. Disruption of ALIX diminished LMP1-induced sEV PD-L1 secretion and enhanced the anti-tumor immunity of CD8+ T cells both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, increased expression levels of LMP1 and ALIX were positively correlated with enhanced immunosuppressive features and worse prognostic outcomes in NPC patients.

CONCLUSION

Our findings uncovered the mechanism by which LMP1 interacts with ALIX and PD-L1 to form a trimolecular complex, facilitating PD-L1 loading into ALIX-dependent sEV secretion pathway, ultimately inhibiting the anti-tumor immune response in NPC. This highlights a novel target and prognostic marker for NPC immunotherapy.

TMEM52B Isoforms P18 and P20 Differentially Promote the Oncogenesis and Metastasis of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Transmembrane protein 52B (TMEM52B), a newly identified tumor-related gene, has been reported to regulate various tumors, yet its role in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains unclear. Transcriptomic analysis of NPC cell lines reveals frequent overexpression of TMEM52B, and immunohistochemical results show that TMEM52B is associated with advanced tumor stage, recurrence, and decreased survival time. Depleting TMEM52B inhibits the proliferation, migration, invasion, and oncogenesis of NPC cells in vivo. TMEM52B encodes two isoforms, TMEM52B-P18 and TMEM52B-P20, differing in their N-terminals. While both isoforms exhibit similar pro-oncogenic roles and contribute to drug resistance in NPC, TMEM52B-P20 differentially promotes metastasis. This functional discrepancy may be attributed to their distinct subcellular localization; TMEM52B-P18 is confined to the cytoplasm, while TMEM52B-P20 is found both at the cell membrane and in the cytoplasm. Mechanistically, cytoplasmic TMEM52B enhances AKT phosphorylation by interacting with phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1), fostering NPC growth and metastasis. Meanwhile, membrane-localized TMEM52B-P20 promotes E-cadherin ubiquitination and degradation by facilitating its interaction with the E3 ubiquitin ligase NEDD4, further driving NPC metastasis. In conclusion, the TMEM52B-P18 and TMEM52B-P20 isoforms promote the metastasis of NPC cells through different mechanisms. Drugs targeting these TMEM52B isoforms may offer therapeutic benefits to cancer patients with varying degrees of metastasis.

Could MMP3 and MMP9 Serve as Biomarkers in EBV-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer

The high incidence of, and mortality from, head and neck cancers (HNCs), including those related to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), constitute a major challenge for modern medicine, both in terms of diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, many researchers have made efforts to identify diagnostic and prognostic factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic usefulness of matrix metalloproteinase 3 (MMP 3) and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP 9) in EBV positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients. For this purpose, the level of these MMPs in the serum of patients with EBV-positive OPSCC was analyzed in relation to the degree of histological differentiation and TNM classification. Our research team's results indicate that the level of both MMPs is much higher in the EBV positive OPSCC patients compared to the EBV negative and control groups. Moreover, their levels were higher in more advanced clinical stages. Considering the possible correlation between the level of MMP 3, MMP 9 and anti-EBV antibodies, and also viral load, after statistical analysis using multiple linear regression, their high correlation was demonstrated. The obtained results confirm the diagnostic accuracy for MMP 3 and MMP 9. Both MMPs may be useful in the diagnosis of EBV positive OPSCC patients.

The programed death-1/programed death ligand-1 axis and its potential as a therapeutic target for virus-associated tumours

As an important and serious condition impacting human health, the diagnosis, and treatment of tumours is clinically vital because tumour cell immune escape sustains tumour development. Programed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) on tumour cell surfaces binds to the programed death-1 (PD-1), inhibits T cell activation, and induces apoptosis, and incapacitates cells. This allows tumour cells to evade recognition and clearance by the immune system, thereby permitting tumour occurrence, and development and poor prognosis outcomes in patients with tumours. Currently, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy has become pivotal in tumour treatment. Pathogens, especially viruses, are important factors which induce many tumours. In this article, we examine associations between Epstein-Barr virus, human papilloma virus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and human immunodeficiency virus type 1-related tumours and PD-1/PD-L1 axis.

Mechanisms of T cell evasion by Epstein-Barr virus and implications for tumor survival

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a prevalent oncogenic virus estimated to infect greater than 90% of the world's population. Following initial infection, it establishes latency in host B cells. EBV has developed a multitude of techniques to avoid detection by the host immune system and establish lifelong infection. T cells, as important contributors to cell-mediated immunity, make an attractive target for these immunoevasive strategies. Indeed, EBV has evolved numerous mechanisms to modulate T cell responses. For example, it can augment expression of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), which inhibits T cell function, and downregulates the interferon response, which has a strong impact on T cell regulation. It also modulates interleukin secretion and can influence major histocompatibility complex (MHC) expression and presentation. In addition to facilitating persistent EBV infection, these immunoregulatory mechanisms have significant implications for evasion of the immune response by tumor cells. This review dissects the mechanisms through which EBV avoids detection by host T cells and discusses how these mechanisms play into tumor survival. It concludes with an overview of cancer treatments targeting T cells in the setting of EBV-associated malignancy.

Recent Advances in Assessing the Clinical Implications of Epstein-Barr Virus Infection and Their Application to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Reports about the oncogenic mechanisms underlying nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) have been accumulating since the discovery of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in NPC cells. EBV is the primary causative agent of NPC. EBV-host and tumor-immune system interactions underlie the unique representative pathology of NPC, which is an undifferentiated cancer cell with extensive lymphocyte infiltration. Recent advances in the understanding of immune evasion and checkpoints have changed the treatment of NPC in clinical settings. The main EBV genes involved in NPC are LMP1, which is the primary EBV oncogene, and BZLF1, which induces the lytic phase of EBV. These two multifunctional genes affect host cell behavior, including the tumor-immune microenvironment and EBV behavior. Latent infections, elevated concentrations of the anti-EBV antibody and plasma EBV DNA have been used as biomarkers of EBV-associated NPC. The massive infiltration of lymphocytes in the stroma suggests the immunogenic characteristics of NPC as a virus-infected tumor and, at the same time, also indicates the presence of a sophisticated immunosuppressive system within NPC tumors. In fact, immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown promise in improving the prognosis of NPC patients with recurrent and metastatic disease. However, patients with advanced NPC still require invasive treatments. Therefore, there is a pressing need to develop an effective screening system for early-stage detection of NPC in patients. Various modalities, such as nasopharyngeal cytology, cell-free DNA methylation, and deep learning-assisted nasopharyngeal endoscopy for screening and diagnosis, have been introduced. Each modality has its advantages and disadvantages. A reciprocal combination of these modalities will improve screening and early diagnosis of NPC.

Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 enhances levels of large extracellular vesicle-associated PD-L1

IMPORTANCE

A growing body of evidence has supported the notion that viruses utilize EVs and associated pathways to incorporate viral products. This allows for the evasion of an immune response while enabling viral spread within the host. Given that viral proteins often elicit strong antigenic peptides that are recognized by T cells, the regulation of the PD-L1 pathway through the overexpression of lEV-associated PD-L1 may serve as a strategy for immune evasion by viruses. The discovery that EBV LMP1 increases the secretion of PD-L1 in larger EVs identifies a new potential target for immune blockade therapy in EBV-associated cancers. Our findings may help to clarify the mechanism of LMP1-mediated enhancement of PD-L1 packaging into lEVs and may lead to the identification of more specific targets for treatment. Additionally, the identification of lEV biomarkers that predict a viral origin of disease could allow for more targeted therapies to be developed.

Prognostic value of PD-1, PD-L1 and PD-L2 deserves attention in head and neck cancer

Head and neck cancer has high heterogeneity with poor prognosis, and emerging researches have been focusing on the prognostic markers of head and neck cancer. PD-L1 expression is an important basis for strategies of immunosuppressive treatment, but whether it has prognostic value is still controversial. Although meta-analysis on PD-L1 expression versus head and neck cancer prognosis has been performed, the conclusions are controversial. Since PD-L1 and PD-L2 are two receptors for PD-1, here we summarize and analyze the different prognostic values of PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 in head and neck cancer in the context of different cell types, tissue localization and protein forms. We propose that for head and neck cancer, the risk warning value of PD-1/PD-L1 expression in precancerous lesions is worthy of attention, and the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression at different subcellular levels as well as the judgment convenience of prognostic value of PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2 should be fully considered. The PD-L1 evaluation systems established based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are not fully suitable for the evaluation of PD-L1 prognosis in head and neck cancer. It is necessary to establish a new PD-L1 evaluation system based on the prognosis for further explorations. The prognostic value of PD-L1, PD-L2 expression in head and neck cancer may be different for early-stage and late-stage samples, and further stratification is required.

Enhanced PD-L1 Expression in LMP1-positive Cells of Epstein-Barr Virus-associated Malignant Lymphomas and Lymphoproliferative Disorders: A Single-cell Resolution Analysis With Multiplex Fluorescence Immunohistochemistry and In Situ Hybridization

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is associated with various types of human malignancies and with programmed death ligand (PD-L) 1 expression in neoplastic cells. However, in EBV-associated malignant lymphomas and lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs), there is limited information regarding PD-L1 expression profiles among different histologic types and patterns of EBV latency. First, we investigated PD-L1 and EBV latent gene expression using conventional immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization in 42 EBV-associated malignant lymphomas and LPDs. Classic Hodgkin lymphoma showed the highest PD-L1 expression with diffuse expression in all cases, followed by diffuse large B-cell lymphoma/Burkitt lymphoma, LPDs, and extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma. EBV latency at the case level was not associated with PD-L1 expression. We further evaluated the expression of PD-L1 and EBV latent genes in tumor cells at single-cell resolution using multiplex fluorescence imaging. This analysis revealed that positivity rates of latent membrane protein (LMP) 1 in tumor cells were 1.0% to 89.5% (mean 35.4%) in latency type II/III cases, and LMP1+ cells showed more frequent PD-L1 expression than LMP1- cells (P<0.0001, paired t test). In contrast, no association was observed between EBV nuclear antigen 2 and PD-L1 expression. Notably, tumor cells exhibiting Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg cell-like morphology co-expressed PD-L1 and LMP1 more often than those that do not. Our observations suggested that LMP1 upregulates PD-L1 expression and is a potential biomarker for predicting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In addition, the heterogeneous expression of PD-L1 and EBV latent genes may produce diverse tumor cells with different oncogenic and immune-evasive properties, leading to resistance to targeted therapies.

Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Malignancies and Immune Escape: The Role of the Tumor Microenvironment and Tumor Cell Evasion Strategies

Simple Summary

The Epstein–Barr virus, also termed human herpes virus 4, is a human pathogenic double-stranded DNA virus. It is highly prevalent and has been linked to the development of 1–2% of cancers worldwide. EBV-associated malignancies encompass various structural and epigenetic alterations. In addition, EBV-encoded gene products and microRNAs interfere with innate and adaptive immunity and modulate the tumor microenvironment. This review provides an overview of the characteristic features of EBV with a focus on the intrinsic and extrinsic immune evasion strategies, which contribute to EBV-associated malignancies.

Abstract

The detailed mechanisms of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection in the initiation and progression of EBV-associated malignancies are not yet completely understood. During the last years, new insights into the mechanisms of malignant transformation of EBV-infected cells including somatic mutations and epigenetic modifications, their impact on the microenvironment and resulting unique immune signatures related to immune system functional status and immune escape strategies have been reported. In this context, there exists increasing evidence that EBV-infected tumor cells can influence the tumor microenvironment to their own benefit by establishing an immune-suppressive surrounding. The identified mechanisms include EBV gene integration and latent expression of EBV-infection-triggered cytokines by tumor and/or bystander cells, e.g., cancer-associated fibroblasts with effects on the composition and spatial distribution of the immune cell subpopulations next to the infected cells, stroma constituents and extracellular vesicles. This review summarizes (i) the typical stages of the viral life cycle and EBV-associated transformation, (ii) strategies to detect EBV genome and activity and to differentiate various latency types, (iii) the role of the tumor microenvironment in EBV-associated malignancies, (iv) the different immune escape mechanisms and (v) their clinical relevance. This gained information will enhance the development of therapies against EBV-mediated diseases to improve patient outcome.

Interplay between Epstein-Barr virus infection and environmental xenobiotic exposure in cancer

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a herpesvirus associated with lymphoid and epithelial malignancies. Both B cells and epithelial cells are susceptible and permissive to EBV infection. However, considering that 90% of the human population is persistently EBV-infected, with a minority of them developing cancer, additional factors are necessary for tumor development. Xenobiotics such as tobacco smoke (TS) components, pollutants, pesticides, and food chemicals have been suggested as cofactors involved in EBV-associated cancers. In this review, the suggested mechanisms by which xenobiotics cooperate with EBV for carcinogenesis are discussed. Additionally, a model is proposed in which xenobiotics, which promote oxidative stress (OS) and DNA damage, regulate EBV replication, promoting either the maintenance of viral genomes or lytic activation, ultimately leading to cancer. Interactions between EBV and xenobiotics represent an opportunity to identify mechanisms by which this virus is involved in carcinogenesis and may, in turn, suggest both prevention and control strategies for EBV-associated cancers.

Soluble Programmed Death Ligand-1 (sPD-L1): A Pool of Circulating Proteins Implicated in Health and Diseases

Upon T-cell receptor stimulation, the Programmed cell Death-1 receptor (PD-1) expressed on T-cells can interact with its ligand PD-L1 expressed at the surface of cancer cells or antigen-presenting cells. Monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-1 or PD-L1 are routinely used for the treatment of cancers, but their clinical efficacy varies largely across the variety of tumor types. A part of the variability is linked to the existence of several forms of PD-L1, either expressed on the plasma membrane (mPD-L1), at the surface of secreted cellular exosomes (exoPD-L1), in cell nuclei (nPD-L1), or as a circulating, soluble protein (sPD-L1). Here, we have reviewed the different origins and roles of sPD-L1 in humans to highlight the biochemical and functional heterogeneity of the soluble protein. sPD-L1 isoforms can be generated essentially by two non-exclusive processes: (i) proteolysis of m/exoPD-L1 by metalloproteases, such as metalloproteinases (MMP) and A disintegrin and metalloproteases (ADAM), which are capable of shedding membrane PD-L1 to release an active soluble form, and (ii) the alternative splicing of PD-L1 pre-mRNA, leading in some cases to the release of sPD-L1 protein isoforms lacking the transmembrane domain. The expression and secretion of sPD-L1 have been observed in a large variety of pathologies, well beyond cancer, notably in different pulmonary diseases, chronic inflammatory and autoimmune disorders, and viral diseases. The expression and role of sPD-L1 during pregnancy are also evoked. The structural heterogeneity of sPD-L1 proteins, and associated functional/cellular plurality, should be kept in mind when considering sPD-L1 as a biomarker or as a drug target. The membrane, exosomal and soluble forms of PD-L1 are all integral parts of the highly dynamic PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway, essential for immune-tolerance or immune-escape.