Impact of Early Incorporation of Nutrition Interventions as a Component of Cancer Therapy in Adults: A Review

Cost-Effectiveness of Oral Nutritional Supplements in Malnourished or at Risk of Disease-Related Malnutrition Cancer Patients in North Macedonia

Purpose

This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of medical nutritional support in a cancer care program in North Macedonia, comparing specialized oral nutritional supplements (ONS) with the standard of care (SOC) in managing disease-related malnutrition (DRM) in patients with or at risk of tumor cachexia syndrome.

Methods

A previously published decision tree model was employed to evaluate the economic impact of supportive treatment in cancer patients eligible for ONS. Monthly transition probabilities between health states, length of hospital stay for each treatment strategy, and utility parameters were derived from the literature. For base-case analysis, the cancer care program duration was set at 30 days. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of a national health insurance fund, utilizing a 13-year time horizon with monthly cycles. Only direct supportive care costs, estimated from publicly available data, were considered. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained per patient and associated costs were calculated, with outcomes and costs discounted at 3.0% annually. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess results robustness.

Results

In the base case analysis, ONS was the dominant treatment strategy, with total costs per patient of €2605.01 for ONS versus €3759.23 for SOC, indicating a significant cost reduction. Reduced hospitalization expenses outweighed the higher acquisition costs of ONS. Additionally, ONS provided greater health benefits, achieving 8.21 QALY vs 7.91QALY in the SOC group. The resulting Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) was negative, reinforcing ONS as the dominant strategy. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that the cost-effectiveness was primarily driven by cancer program duration, with cost-saving benefits up to 132 days.

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrate that specialized ONS is a cost-effective treatment option within a cancer care program compared with SOC. While this study focuses on North Macedonia, the results are applicable to countries with similar economic and healthcare structures, reinforcing ONS as a valuable intervention across comparable healthcare systems.

Nutrition Care in Cancer: An Overlooked Part of Patient-Centered Care

OBJECTIVES

Robust evidence highlights the crucial role of nutrition for people with cancer, and international organizations recognize it as a basic human right linked to health and food. Within this context, we aim to emphasize the critical role of nutrition care for cancer patients and to highlight the essential contributions of nurses in providing patient-centered nutrition care.

METHODS

This opinion paper synthesizes evidence and perspectives from peer-reviewed articles and position papers. Furthermore, insights were drawn from the European Commission's Health Policy Platform thematic network "Integrated Nutrition Cancer Care".

RESULTS

Implementation of nutrition care is inconsistent, which can lead to inequalities in care. In oncology, nutrition care is vital as nutrition-related issues significantly impact clinical and patient outcomes. Studies show that cancer nurses can effectively integrate and manage nutrition care. Failure to address nutrition issues negatively impacts an array of patient outcomes and reduces quality of life. Thus, integrating nutrition care throughout routine cancer care is essential.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer nurses, as core multidisciplinary team members, are often the initial and consistent contact for cancer patients. They are ideally positioned to play a key role in securing nutrition care throughout the trajectory of cancer care.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Cancer nurses should be empowered and enabled to manage all aspects of nutrition care in tandem with dietitians. This approach can improve patient outcomes, enhance quality of life, and ensure equitable access to essential nutrition care for all cancer patients.

[The NOA project (Oncological Nutrition in Andalucía) in clinical practice: results 6 months after project completion]

INTRODUCTION

the NOA project analyses the nutritional care of cancer patients in different centres in Andalusia, establishes areas for improvement (phases 1 and 2) and evaluates its implementation during a period of 6 months (phase 3). The results of the different phases have been previously published.

OBJECTIVES

to evaluate the degree of implementation of the different measures in clinical practice 6 months after the end of the project (12 months after the start of the project) in the Hospital Puerta del Mar (Cádiz).

METHODS

prospective evaluation of the percentage of patients with nutritional screening, during hospitalisation and in outpatient clinics of Medical Oncology and Radiation Oncology, of the participation of members of the Nutrition Unit in oncology committees and of the assessment of the patients presented at these sessions.

RESULTS

during the duration of the project we observed a progressive increase in the percentage of patients with nutritional screening (both in hospitalised patients and in outpatients), a regular incorporation of members of the Nutrition Unit in tumour committees and an increase in the number of patients undergoing nutritional assessment and intervention. These results have been maintained after the end of the project.

CONCLUSIONS

the implementation of these measures has resulted in a change in the usual clinical practice in the nutritional care of cancer patients and an increase in the detection of patients in need of nutritional intervention.

Effects of nutritional interventions on cognitive function in adult cancer survivors: A systematic review

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nutritional interventions (i.e. nutritional support, dietary patterns and dietary supplements) on cognitive function in cancer survivors.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

A systematic and comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and CINAHL was conducted from the inception until March 10, 2023. The last search was conducted on December 10, 2023.

REPORTING METHOD

PRISMA.

RESULTS

A total of 59 randomized controlled trials were included for analysis. Nutritional support, dietary patterns and dietary supplements improved cognitive function in cancer survivors with no apparent safety concerns. The anti-inflammatory diet, the fasting-mimicking diet and the web-based diet significantly improved cognitive function. Whereas the ketogenic diet or dietary advice to consume more soluble dietary fibres and less insoluble dietary fibres and lactose could not. There was evidence from dietary supplements to support the beneficial effects of polyunsaturated fatty acid supplements, traditional herbal medicines and other supplements.

CONCLUSIONS

Nutritional interventions have great promise for improving cognitive function in adult cancer survivors. Further validation of the nutritional interventions supported in this study in other survivors and exploration of more effective nutritional interventions are needed.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

This work can support the construction of nutritional support interventions and dietary guidance programs to prevent cancer-related cognitive decline.

IMPACT

This work filled a gap in preventive strategies for cancer-related cognitive decline from a nutritional perspective. Nutritional support, dietary patterns, and dietary supplements can prevent cancer-related cognitive decline without serious safety concerns. This work highlighted nutritional interventions that have the potential to improve cognitive function in cancer survivors, benefiting the further construction of evidence-based nutritional intervention programs.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

Predictive Value of the Naples Prognostic Score for Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Receiving Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

The Naples prognostic score (NPS) is a novel multidimensional inflammatory and nutritional assessment system in cancer patients. However, its significance in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear. The study has a single-center, retrospective design and included 631 patients with CKD who underwent index PCI between 2019 and 2022. All participants were divided into 2 groups according to the NPS (Low-risk group: n = 209; High-risk group: n = 422) and followed up until November 2022. The primary endpoint was Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE). NPS predicted MACE events better than other scores, besides, high-risk NPS with severe renal dysfunction (RD) group (MODEL 2) had superior MACE diagnostic efficiency than NPS high-risk group lonely. (NPS: AUC: 0.605, P < .001; MODEL 2: AUC: 0.624, P < .001, respectively). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of two groups showed that high-risk group had higher incidence of MACE (P < .001). Meanwhile, high-risk group had higher MACE events [adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) 2.013, 95% CI 1.294, 3.132; P = .002]. NPS is an independent prognostic factor for CKD patients undergoing index PCI before operation whose predictive value for survival prognosis is better than other nutritional and inflammatory indicators. Compared with low NPS, patients with high NPS have a relatively poor prognosis.

Barriers and facilitators of improved nutritional support for patients newly diagnosed with cancer: a pre-implementation study

BACKGROUND

Disease-related malnutrition affects a significant number of patients with cancer and poses a major social problem worldwide. Despite both global and national guidelines to prevent and treat malnutrition, the prevalence is high, ranging from 20 to 70% in all patients with cancer. This study aimed to explore the current practice of nutritional support for patients with cancer at a large university hospital in Norway and to explore potential barriers and facilitators of the intervention in the Green Approach to Improved Nutritional support for patients with cancer (GAIN), prior to implementation in a clinical setting.

METHODS

The study used individual interviews and a focus group discussion to collect data. Study participants included different healthcare professionals and patients with cancer treated at a nutrition outpatient clinic. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to guide the thematic data analysis.

RESULTS

Barriers connected to the current nutritional support were limited resources and undefined roles concerning responsibility for providing nutritional support among healthcare professionals. Facilitators included a desire for change regarding the current nutritional practice. The GAIN intervention was perceived as feasible for patients and healthcare professionals. Potential barriers included limited knowledge of technology, lack of motivation among patients, and a potential added burden experienced by the participating patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The identification of the potential barriers and facilitators of the current nutritional support to patients with cancer will be used to plan the implementation of improved nutritional support in a randomized controlled trial for patients with cancer prior to clinical implementation. The current findings may be of value to others trying to implement either or both nutritional support and digital application tools in a clinical healthcare setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered in the National Institutes of Health Clinical trials 08/09/22. The identification code is NCT05544318.

The association between malnutrition risk and revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS-r) scores in an adult outpatient oncology population: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Cancer-associated malnutrition is associated with worse symptom severity, functional status, quality of life, and overall survival. Malnutrition in cancer patients is often under-recognized and undertreated, emphasizing the need for standardized pathways for nutritional management in this population. The objectives of this study were to (1) investigate the relationship between malnutrition risk and self-reported symptom severity scores in an adult oncology outpatient population and (2) to identify whether a secondary screening tool for malnutrition risk (abPG-SGA) should be recommended for patients with a specific ESAS-r cut-off score or group of ESAS-r cut-off scores.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted. Malnutrition risk was measured using the Abridged Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (abPG-SGA). Cancer symptom severity was measured using the Revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS-r). In accordance with standard institutional practice, patients completed both tools at first consult at the cancer centre. Adult patients who completed the ESAS-r and abPG-SGA on the same day between February 2017 and January 2020 were included. Spearman's correlation, Mann Whitney U tests, receiver operating characteristic curves, and binary logistic regression models were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

2071 oncology outpatients met inclusion criteria (mean age 65.7), of which 33.6% were identified to be at risk for malnutrition. For all ESAS-r parameters (pain, tiredness, drowsiness, nausea, lack of appetite, shortness of breath, depression, anxiety, and wellbeing), patients at risk for malnutrition had significantly higher scores (P < 0.001). All ESAS-r parameters were positively correlated with abPG-SGA score (P < 0.01). The ESAS-r parameters that best predicted malnutrition risk status were total ESAS-r score, lack of appetite, tiredness, and wellbeing (area under the curve = 0.824, 0.812, 0.764, 0.761 respectively). Lack of appetite score ≥ 1 demonstrated a sensitivity of 77.4% and specificity of 77.0%. Combining lack of appetite score ≥ 1 with total ESAS score > 14 yielded a sensitivity of 87.9% and specificity of 62.8%.

CONCLUSION

Malnutrition risk as measured by the abPG-SGA and symptom severity scores as measured by the ESAS-r are positively and significantly correlated. Given the widespread use of the ESAS-r in cancer care, utilizing specific ESAS-r cut-offs to trigger malnutrition screening could be a viable way to identify cancer patients at risk for malnutrition.

Instruments for Evaluating the Nutritional Status of Cancer Patients Undergoing Antineoplastic Treatment: A Scoping Review

The use of validated tools to evaluate the nutritional status of the cancer patient provides guaranteed precision and reliability in their nutritional evaluation, ensuring that the information is accurate and reflects the patient's situation. The aim of this study was to identify the valid and reliable instruments in the evaluation of the nutritional status of cancer patients with a diagnosis of solid tumor undergoing antineoplastic treatment (chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy). A scoping review was conducted to search for original articles published in scientific journals in English, Spanish, or Portuguese in the past five years. In order to identify potentially relevant documents, searches were performed in the following databases: SCOPUS, WOS, CINAHL, MEDLINE, BVS, and PUBMED. DECS-MeSH descriptors and Boolean operators were used. In addition, the Arksey and O'Malley protocol, the Joanne Briggs Institute (JBI) method, and the flow chart of the Preferred Information Elements for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, known as PRISMA, were followed. The initial search strategy identified a total of 164 references, which were examined successively, leaving a final selection of ten studies. It was found that the most used instrument for nutritional evaluation was the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA). Other questionnaires also stood out such as the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS 2002), and the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy (FAACT). The variation in the tools used ranges from subjective assessments to objective measurements, thus underlining the need for a comprehensive and individualized approach.

Exploring dietary changes and supplement use among cancer patients in Norway: prevalence, motivations, disclosure, information, and perceived risks and benefits: a cross sectional study

BACKGROUND

Cancer is the leading cause of death in Norway, with prostate, breast, lung, and colon cancers being the most prevalent types. Adopting a healthy and varied diet can help reduce cancer risk and recurrence. However, access to dietary counselling remains limited for cancer patients in Norway. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of dietary supplement use and dietary changes made by cancer patients and survivors. Additionally, it sought to explore the reason(s) for such practices, communication with healthcare providers, sources of information, and reported benefits and potential harms resulting from these changes and supplement use.

METHODS

Conducted in collaboration with the Norwegian Cancer Society (NCS), this online cross-sectional study targeted members of their user panel who had either current or previous cancer (n = 706). The study took place in September/October 2021, utilizing a modified cancer-specific version of the International Questionnaire to Measure Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (I-CAM-Q). Out of 468 participants (315 women and 153 men), 67.2% consented to participate. Between-group analyses were conducted using Pearson chi-square tests and Fisher exact tests for categorical variables, while independent sample t-tests were applied for continuous variables.

RESULTS

The majority of the participants (97%) reported making changes to their diet (78%) and/or incorporating dietary supplements (73%) in response to their cancer diagnosis. The primary goal of these changes was to strengthen their body and immune system. Almost half of the participants (49%) reported that they found these changes beneficial and discussed them openly with their healthcare providers, with family physicians being the most common point of discussion (25%). Adverse effects were reported by only a few participants, mostly mild. Information about dietary changes and supplements was primarily sourced from the internet or healthcare providers.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights that most individuals affected by cancer attribute to dietary adjustment. It also emphasizes the importance of addressing adherence to dietary recommendations and using reliable sources of information. Additionally, the study highlights the potential, yet currently underutilized, role of healthcare professionals in initiating dialogues about dietary interventions to address any unmet needs of patients. Such proactive engagement may contribute to the promotion of reliable sources of information and the prevention of non-evidence-based and potentially harmful diets or supplement adoption.

Construction and validation of a prognostic nutritional index-based nomogram for predicting pathological complete response in breast cancer: a two-center study of 1,170 patients

Background

Pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is associated with favorable outcomes in breast cancer patients. Identifying reliable predictors for pCR can assist in selecting patients who will derive the most benefit from NAC. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) serves as an indicator of nutritional status and systemic immune competence. It has emerged as a prognostic biomarker in several malignancies; however, its predictive value for pCR in breast cancer remains uncertain. The objective of this study is to assess the predictive value of pretreatment PNI for pCR in breast cancer patients.

Methods

A total of 1170 patients who received NAC in two centers were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into three cohorts: a training cohort (n=545), an internal validation cohort (n=233), and an external validation cohort (n=392). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the predictive value of PNI and other clinicopathological factors. A stepwise logistic regression model for pCR based on the smallest Akaike information criterion was utilized to develop a nomogram. The C-index, calibration plots and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the discrimination, calibration and clinical value of the model.

Results

Patients with a high PNI (≥53) had a significantly increased pCR rate (OR 2.217, 95% CI 1.215-4.043, p=0.009). Tumor size, clinical nodal status, histological grade, ER, Ki67 and PNI were identified as independent predictors and included in the final model. A nomogram was developed as a graphical representation of the model, which incorporated the PNI and five other factors (AIC=356.13). The nomogram demonstrated satisfactory calibration and discrimination in the training cohort (C-index: 0.816, 95% CI 0.765-0.866), the internal validation cohort (C-index: 0.780, 95% CI 0.697-0.864) and external validation cohort (C-index: 0.714, 95% CI 0.660-0.769). Furthermore, DCA indicated a clinical net benefit from the nomogram.

Conclusion

The pretreatment PNI is a reliable predictor for pCR in breast cancer patients. The PNI-based nomogram is a low-cost, noninvasive tool with favorable predictive accuracy for pCR, which can assist in determining individualized treatment strategies for breast cancer patients.

Is virtual nutritional counseling efficacious for cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic?

This study investigates the outcomes of virtual nutritional counseling (VNC) for oncology patients during the Covid-19 pandemic. Our study evaluated the nutritional status data of cancer patients at the baseline and after VNC. An oncology dietitian evaluated the patients by video calling each patient via WhatsApp and sent an individual nutrition diet plan and recommendations via e-mail. Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) was used as a screening and evaluation tool to assess nutritional status. A total of 157 patients with a mean age of 55.8 ± 14.7 (r = 19-89) were included in the study. Researchers detected at least one nutrition-related sign in 77.7% of patients. After the VNC and based on the final PG-SGA assessments, 62.2% of the patients whose baseline PG-SGA Score-B improved to Score-A, 12.5% with a baseline PG-SGA Score-C improved to Score-A and 54.2% with a baseline Score-C improved to a Score-B (χ2 = 55,000, P < 0.001). Based on the number of VNCs, the improvement in malnutrition status following two sessions and three or more sessions was found to be 17.6% and 35.7%, respectively (P < 0.001). Our results confirm that VNC can improve the nutritional status of cancer patients. Hence, nutritional counseling should be an integral part of oncological treatment.

Naples Prognostic Score and Prediction of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in STEMI Patients

The Naples score is a new prognostic score developed according to inflammatory and nutritional status and frequently evaluated in cancer patients. The present study aimed to evaluate using the Naples prognostic score (NPS) to predict the development of decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The study has a multicenter and retrospective design and included 2280 patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) between 2017 and 2022. All participants were divided into 2 groups according to their NPS. The relationship between these 2 groups and LVEF was evaluated. The low-Naples risk group (Group-1) included 799 patients, and the high-Naples risk group (Group-2) had 1481 patients. Hospital mortality, shock, and no-reflow rates were found to be higher in Group 2 compared with Group 1 (P < .001, P = .032, P = .004). The NPS was significantly inversely associated with discharge LVEF (B coefficient: -1.51, 95% CI-2.26; -.76, P = .001). NPS, a simple and easily calculated risk score, may help identify high-risk STEMI patients. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to demonstrate the relationship between low LVEF and NPS in patients with STEMI.

Impact of the peripheral blood inflammatory indices and modified nomogram-revised risk index on survival of Extranodal Nasal-Type Natural Killer/T-Cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

At present, peripheral blood markers are easily accessible information and clinically valuable prognostic indicators in extranodal nasal-type natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTCL). Nevertheless, the role of its comprehensive score in ENKTCL remains to be determined.

OBJECTIVE

Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the prognostic effect of the peripheral inflammation score on ENKTCL.

METHODS

The retrospective study included 183 patients with ENKTCL. Univariate Cox regression analyses and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression were used to construct the inflammation-related prognostic index named Risk. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses and regression adjustment with propensity score matching (PSM) were used to evaluate the prognostic ability of risk. The performance of the modified nomogram-revised risk index (NRI) by integrating risk was evaluated with the area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), decision curve analysis (DCA), and integrated Brier score (IBS).

RESULTS

The risk cut-off value, constructed by the lymphocyte count, platelet count, albumin level, LMR, and PNI, was -1.3486. Before PSM, multivariate analysis showed that risk was significantly associated with OS (HR = 2.577, 95% CI = 1.614-4.114, P< 0.001) and PFS (HR = 2.679, 95% CI = 1.744-4.114, P< 0.001). After PSM adjustment, risk was still an independent factor for OS (HR = 2.829, 95% CI = 1.601-5.001, P< 0.001) and PFS (HR = 2.877, 95% CI = 1.735-4.770, P< 0.001). With the NRI, the modified NRI by integrating risk increased the AUC and clinical net benefit and decreased the IBS.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk is an easily accessible and inexpensive indicator that may be used as a prognostic marker and could improve NRI predictive power in patients with ENKTCL.

Reducing In-Hospital and 60-Day Mortality in Critically Ill Patients after Surgery with Strict Nutritional Supplementation: A Prospective, Single-Labeled, Randomized Controlled Trial

Malnutrition in critically ill patients is a global concern, especially those who undergo abdominal surgery, as it is associated to higher infectious complications, prolonged hospital stays, and increased morbidity. Despite the importance of proper nutrition, guidelines remain broad, and practical implementation is often inadequate. We aimed to assess the effects of strict nutritional provision and investigate the appropriate target for nutrition support. A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units following abdominal surgery. The intervention group received targeted protein and calories, with consultation from a nutritional support team upon admission. In total, 181 patients in the intervention and 144 in the control group were analyzed. The intervention group demonstrated improved nutrition provision and subsequently better clinical outcomes, including a reduced 60-day mortality (4.4 versus 15.3, p = 0.001), postoperative complications (24.9 versus 47.2, p < 0.001), and in-hospital mortality (5 versus 17.4, p < 0.001). High modified nutrition risk in the critically ill scores [odds ratio (OR) = 2.658, 95% CI = 1.498-4.716] were associated with increased 60-day mortality, while active nutritional intervention (OR = 0.312, 95% CI = 0.111-0.873) was associated with lower mortality rates. Notably, the provision of targeted energy and protein alone did not exhibit a significant association with mortality outcomes.

[Living Actively with Cancer - Recommendations for a Healthy Life Style: Needs Assessment and Design of Multimedia Patient Information]

The positive effects of a healthy lifestyle on the holistic physical condition and quality of life of cancer survivors is scientifically proven. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines for Survivorship specifically highlight the need for support in these areas. The lack of specialised offers for cancer patients in predominantly rural areas, however, represents a high level of assistance needed in terms of the development and implementation of a healthy lifestyle. Following a needs assessment, our aim was to conceptualise and design an easily accessible multi-media patient information system on the basis of a social-cognitive process model on health behaviour (Health Action Process Approach - HAPA). A higher level of health literacy represents, inter alia, the basis for informed choice and, as such, forms an important resource for the aftercare of cancer patients. Further studies are recommended on the acceptance, use and effects of patient information with regard to intended longer-term changes of health behaviour.

Nutrition care is an integral part of patient-centred medical care: a European consensus

While healthcare is becoming more patient-centred, evidence-based nutrition interventions are still not accessible to all patients with cancer. As nutrition interventions directly improve clinical and socioeconomic outcomes, patient-centred care is not complete without nutrition care. While awareness of the negative impact of malnutrition on clinical outcomes, quality of life, and functional and emotional wellbeing in cancer is growing, there is relatively poor awareness amongst patients, clinicians, policymakers, and payers that nutrition interventions -particularly those begun in the early stages of the disease course- are an effective method for improving such outcomes. The European Beating Cancer Plan recognises the need for a holistic approach to cancer but lacks actionable recommendations to implement integrated nutrition cancer care at member state level. When considering nutrition care as a human right, the impact on quality of life and functional status must be prioritized, as these may be equally as important to patients, especially in advanced cancer where improvements in clinical outcomes such as survival or tumour burden may not be attainable. We formulate actions needed at the regional and the European level to ensure integrated nutrition care for all patients with cancer. The 4 main Take Home Messages are as follows: 1. The goals of Europe's Beating Cancer Plan cannot be achieved without integrating nutrition across the cancer care continuum. 2. Malnutrition negatively impacts clinical outcomes and has socioeconomic consequences for patients and healthcare systems. 3. Championing integrating nutrition care into cancer care is therefore the duty and ethical responsibility of clinicians (Hippocratic Oath-primum non nocere) and 4. Nutrition care is a cost effective, evidence-based therapy.

Effect of malnutrition and nutritional support to reduce infections in elderly hospitalized patients with cancer: A multicenter survey in China

OBJECTIVES

Malnutrition is common among elderly patients with cancer, and greatly affects patients' quality of life. Malnutrition is a key factor in the development of systemic, chronic, low-grade inflammation that can exacerbate.

METHODS

A total of 633 elderly patients with cancer from 29 tertiary public hospitals in 14 cities in China were selected as the research subjects. Physical examination, questionnaire survey, medical history collection, and blood index detection were performed on the research subjects to analyze the relationship between malnutrition, nutritional support, and infection status.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in infection rate among elderly hospitalized patients with cancer and different cancer types, cancer stages, or therapy methods (P > 0.05). The proportion of vomiting, loss of appetite, depression, and physical fatigue in patients with good nutritional status were lower than in patients with moderate or severe malnutrition (P < 0.05). Nutritional support is crucial for the nutritional status of elderly patients with cancer, and patients without special nutritional guidance are more likely to develop infection (P < 0.05). After adjusting for confounding variables, the results of the logistic regression analysis showed that oral nutritional supplements (odds ratio [OR]: 0.088; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.015-0.514), parenteral nutrition (OR: 0.091; 95% CI, 0.011-0.758), and individualized nutritional guidance (OR: 0.026; 95% CI, 0.003-0.202) were all protective factors associated with cancer infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Many elderly hospitalized patients with cancer have local or systemic infections, and good nutrition is associated with lower rates of infection. Receiving nutritional guidance or support is associated with lower infection rates in elderly patients with cancer.

Evaluation of Nutritional Interventions in the Care Plan for Cancer Patients: The NOA Project

The NOA (Oncological Nutrition in Andalusia) project analyses the degree of integration and areas of improvement in implementing nutritional support in the care plans of cancer patients in Andalusia. The aim was to analyse nutritional interventions for better care of cancer patients and for the improvement of the management of malnutrition in cancer. A prospective evaluation of the implementation of two areas of improvement in nutrition was conducted in three hospitals. Data were collected from each hospital over a six-month period using an online platform. A standardised care plan was designed for hospitals in Andalusia, in which proposed improvements were devised and prioritised, selecting nutritional screening in oncology services and the participation of the Nutrition Support Team (NST) on the tumour boards, as well as the assessment of the patients presented at these sessions. Our results indicated an increase in the number of medical records with nutritional evaluation results six months later, regardless of the type of tumour or hospitalisation; and there was greater participation of the NST on the tumour boards, mainly for head and neck and oesophagogastric cases. Solutions for improvement have been pinpointed and implemented that have positively impacted the nutritional care plan in the course of oncological disease.

Current research trends, hotspots, and frontiers of medical nutrition therapy on cancer: a bibliometric analysis

Background

There is a high prevalence of malnutrition in cancer patients, which seriously affects the anti-cancer therapy effect and outcomes, causing a huge disease burden worldwide. Appropriate nutritional support is important for cancer prevention and control. The aim of this study was to explore the development trends, hotspots, and frontiers of Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT) on Cancer from a bibliometric perspective, and provide new insights for future research and clinic practices.

Methods

The global literature of MNT on Cancer published between 1975 and 2022 were searched in the Web of Science Core Collection Database (WOSCC). After refining the data, descriptive analysis and data visualization were performed with bibliometric tools (CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and R package "bibliometrix").

Results

A total of 10,339 documents with a timespan from 1982 to 2022 were included in this study. The number of documents had increased continuously over the past 40 years, especially with a steep rise from 2016 to 2022. The majority of scientific production outputs were from the United States, which had the most core research institutions and authors. The published documents could be clustered into three themes respectively labeled by terms "double-blind", "cancer" and "quality-of-life". "gastric cancer", "outcome", "inflammation", "sarcopenia" and "exercise" were the most prominent keywords in recent years. "breast-cancer", "colorectal-cancer", "expression", "risk", "in-vitro", "quality-of-life", "cancer" and "life" might represent the newly emerged topics.

Conclusions

There were a good research foundation and reasonable disciplinary structure in the field of medical nutrition therapy for cancer at present. The core research team was mainly located in the United States, England, and other developed countries. According to the current trends in publications, more articles shall be published in the future. Nutritional metabolism, malnutrition risk, and the impact of nutritional therapy on prognosis might be research hotspots. In particular, it was important to focus on specific cancer, such as breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and gastric cancer, which might be the frontiers.

Relationship Between Pretransplantation Nutritional Status and Outcome in Adults with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Pretransplantation nutritional status may impact outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Various simple screening tools have been developed and used to identify patients at risk of malnutrition; however, how best to use these screening tools is unclear, and their accuracy for the prediction of adverse outcomes is unknown. To investigate how these different measures contribute to outcome prediction, we examined a large cohort of adults with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) who underwent allogeneic HCT in first or second remission at our institution between April 2006 and May 2021. We assessed the prognostic role of the Nutrition Risk Index (NRI), which combines weight loss and serum albumin, in 970 adults with AML in first or second remission who had usual body weight information available at AML diagnosis or relapse and before HCT. A low NRI at the time of conditioning for HCT was associated with higher nonrelapse mortality (hazard ratio [HR], .97; 95% confidence interval [CI], .95 to .98; P < .001) and relapse risk (HR, .98; 95% CI, .96 to .99; P < .001) and decreased relapse-free survival (HR, .97; 95% CI, .96 to .98; P < .001) and overall survival (HR, .97; 95% CI, .96 to .98; P < .001), as was a low pre-HCT serum albumin level. After multivariable adjustment, NRI, but not weight loss alone, was associated with outcome. The predictive ability of NRI was overall relatively low and comparable to that of serum albumin, with a C-statistic not exceeding .59. Taken together, our data indicate that pre-HCT level of serum albumin, an acute-phase protein recognized to more accurately reflect the severity of the inflammatory response compared with poor nutritional status, but not weight loss, is independently associated with post-HCT outcome in patients with AML. © 2022 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Strategies to Mitigate Chemotherapy and Radiation Toxicities That Affect Eating

Background: Cancer and its therapy is commonly associated with a variety of side effects that impact eating behaviors that reduce nutritional intake. This review will outline potential causes of chemotherapy and radiation damage as well as approaches for the amelioration of the side effects of cancer during therapy. Methods: Information for clinicians, patients, and their caregivers about toxicity mitigation including nausea reduction, damage to epithelial structures such as skin and mucosa, organ toxicity, and education is reviewed. Results: How to anticipate, reduce, and prevent some toxicities encountered during chemotherapy and radiation is detailed with the goal to improve eating behaviors. Strategies for health care professionals, caregivers, and patients to consider include (a) the reduction in nausea and vomiting, (b) decreasing damage to the mucosa, (c) avoiding a catabolic state and muscle wasting (sarcopenia), and (d) developing therapeutic alliances with patients, caregivers, and oncologists. Conclusions: Although the reduction of side effects involves anticipatory guidance and proactive team effort (e.g., forward observation, electronic interactions, patient reported outcomes), toxicity reduction can be satisfying for not only the patient, but everyone involved in cancer care.

Results of the ECHO (Eating habits CHanges in Oncologic patients) Survey: An Italian Cross-Sectional Multicentric Study to Explore Dietary Changes and Dietary Supplement Use, in Breast Cancer Survivors

The role of a healthy diet in cancer prevention is well recognized. Recent data indicate that following the same advices can also improve cancer survivors’ quality of life. Breast cancer (BC) patients are commonly concerned about diet and nutrition and frequently express the need to obtain health-related information and the will to change their diet and lifestyle. Hence, be aware of survivors’ dietary changes and information needs is crucial for healthcare professionals to guide them toward optimal lifestyle choices. In order to investigate eating habits changes in a BC survivors’ population, we conceived the cross-sectional multicentric study ECHO (Eating habits CHanges in Oncologic patients) Survey. Data were collected from 684 patients, diagnosed with invasive breast cancer, in order to investigate their changes in food consumption, use of supplements, or the beginning of a specific diet, after BC diagnosis. We also examined the sources of information used and if any modification in their diets was reported to the oncologist. We primarily observed that patients increased their consumption of vegetables, pulses, nuts, fruits, wholemeal bread/pasta, grains and fish; while decreasing red and processed meat, refined bread/pasta, baked good and animal fat consumption. Survivors also reported the use of dietary supplements, mainly vitamins, aimed at counteracting therapies’ side effects. Changes in nutritional habits were often adopted without asking or informing the oncologist. Despite BC survivors made some positive changes in their nutritional habits, those modifications were mostly pursued by less than half of them, while the majority of patients consumed nutritional supplements after diagnosis. These results, as well as the failure to communicate with the physicians, reinforce the need to both improve the patient-healthcare professional relationship and to develop tailored nutrition counselling and intervention programs for cancer survivors.

Beneficial Effects of Oral Nutritional Supplements on Body Composition and Biochemical Parameters in Women with Breast Cancer Undergoing Postoperative Chemotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Aim: Recently, more attention has been paid to the role of nutritional intervention in preventing the side effects of chemotherapy in oncology patients. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to analyze the effects of oral nutritional supplements on the body composition and biochemical parameters in women with breast cancer receiving postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: The study involved women diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent surgical treatment and were qualified for chemotherapy (doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide). Women were divided into two groups, depending on whether oral nutritional supplements were used during chemotherapy. Anthropometric and biochemical parameters were analyzed twice in all patients: before and after six weeks of chemotherapy. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed to select patients balanced in terms of age, BMI, and clinicopathological features of the tumor. Statistical comparisons were conducted in a propensity-matched cohort of patients. Results: The value of BMI was maintained constant in the supplemented women older than 56 years after six weeks of chemotherapy. Regardless of age in the supplemented women, a significant increase in muscle mass, fat free mass (FFM), and fat free mass index (FFMI) was demonstrated. An increase in fat mass (FM) including visceral fat was observed only in the non-supplemented control. Regardless of age or initial FM, supplemented women exhibited a constant level of albumin. Moreover, in the supplemented women with normal initial FM, the stable values of triglycerides and HDL cholesterol were maintained after six weeks of chemotherapy. Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that oral nutritional supplements could improve body composition and prevent hypoalbuminemia and lipid abnormalities in women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

Importance of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of Animal Studies: Challenges for Animal-to-Human Translation

Results of animal experiments are used for understanding the pathophysiology of diseases, assessing safety and efficacy of newly developed drugs, and monitoring environmental health hazards among others. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of animal data are important tools to condense animal evidence and translate the data into practical clinical applications. Such studies are conducted to explore heterogeneity, to generate new hypotheses about pathophysiology and treatment, to design new clinical trial modalities, and to test the efficacy and the safety of the various interventions. Here, we provide an overview regarding the importance of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of animal data and discuss common challenges and their potential solutions. Current evidence highlights various problems and challenges that surround these issues, including lack of generalizability of data obtained from animal models, failure in translating data obtained from animals to humans, poor experimental design and the reporting of the animal studies, heterogeneity of the data collected, and methodologic weaknesses of animal systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of animal studies can catalyze translational processes more effectively if they focus on a well-defined hypothesis along with addressing clear inclusion and exclusion criteria, publication bias, heterogeneity of the data, and a coherent and well-balanced assessment of studies' quality.