Non-Responsive and Refractory Coeliac Disease: Experience from the NHS England National Centre

What is new in the management of coeliac disease?

Coeliac disease is the most common immune-mediated enteropathy, affecting approximately 1 % of the population worldwide. Currently, the vast majority of individuals remain undiagnosed. Coeliac disease is triggered by gluten ingestion in genetically predisposed individuals carrying the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes; HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8. Patients with coeliac disease present with a wide spectrum of gastrointestinal and extraintestinal manifestations and, in some cases, without any symptoms. The diagnosis of coeliac disease in adults is based on a combination of clinical suspicion, positive serological markers and histological evidence of small intestinal atrophy on duodenal biopsies. The only effective treatment is a strict, lifelong gluten-free diet. However, up to 20 % of patients report persistent or recurrent symptoms. In this review, we provide a comprehensive update on coeliac disease, focusing on its relevance to the different medical specialities and highlighting the need for a multidisciplinary approach to its diagnosis and management. Clinicians practicing internal medicine have a unique opportunity to diagnose this multisystem autoimmune disease. By doing so, they would avoid delays in diagnosis for these patients. A low threshold for serological testing is recommended.

Beyond gluten-free diet: a critical perspective on phase 2 trials on non-dietary pharmacological therapies for coeliac disease

Coeliac disease is an immune-mediated chronic enteropathy, with a prevalence of around 1% in the general population and occurring in genetically susceptible individuals after the ingestion of gluten proteins present in wheat, rye and barley. Currently, a strict lifelong gluten-free diet is the cornerstone of treatment of coeliac disease. However, maintaining strict dietary adherence is challenging for many patients, due to the high costs, the highly restrictive nature of the diet and the impact on patients' quality of life. Moreover, a tiny minority of coeliac patients can develop pre-malignant/malignant complications of coeliac disease, a group of conditions, that despite being rare, are still burdened by a poor prognosis due to the lack of effective therapies. Therefore, the development of pharmacological treatments as an alternative to or supportive of a gluten-free diet is still an unmet need. The identification of new pathogenetic targets in the last years has enabled the development of several candidates molecules, many of which have been investigated in phase 2/3 clinical trials. In this narrative review we aim to summarise the investigational therapies that have been evaluated in phase 2/3 trials and provide a critical overview on the latest advances in this field.

Prevalence and etiologies of non-responsive celiac disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Non-responsive celiac disease (NRCD) is defined as ongoing symptoms despite 6-12 months of gluten-free diet (GFD), the only known treatment for celiac disease (CeD). There is inconsistency in studies describing the proportion of patients having NRCD and its various causes among patients with CeD. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prevalence and causes of NRCD.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched for original studies reporting the proportion of patients with persistent symptoms after ≥ 6 months of GFD. Studies reporting the etiologies of NRCD were also identified. The systematic review was conducted as per the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed in STATA.

RESULTS

Of 2965 search results, nine studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Five studies (n = 4414) reported data on prevalence, and seven studies (n = 790) reported the causes of NRCD. The pooled prevalence of NRCD was 22% (95% confidence interval, 11-35%). Among patients with NRCD, inadvertent exposure to gluten was the most common cause (33%), followed by functional gastrointestinal disorders including irritable bowel syndrome in 16%. Refractory CeD type II along with its premalignant and malignant sequelae was observed in 7% of patients with NRCD.

CONCLUSION

One in five patients with CeD may not respond to GFD and would likely be classified as NRCD. Inadvertent gluten exposure was the cause of ongoing symptoms in one-third of patients with NRCD. Improving adherence to GFD along with developing novel therapeutics to mitigate symptoms due to ongoing gluten exposure is critical.

Role of capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy in the management of adult patients with coeliac disease and persisting symptoms

BACKGROUND

Small bowel capsule endoscopy (CE) and double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) are recommended for the management of patients with nonresponsive or refractory coeliac disease (CD). However, there is a paucity of data regarding the clinical profiles and outcomes of patients undergoing these investigations.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of two databases of adult patients with CD who underwent CE and/or DBE between 2017 and 2022 at the National Centre for Refractory CD in England. Patient demographic, clinical and endoscopic data were collected, and clinically relevant outcomes were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients (median age 53 years, 64.4 % female) underwent 146 CEs and 25 DBEs. The most common symptoms were diarrhoea (51.5 %), abdominal pain (37.8 %), bloating (34.8 %), and weight loss (29.5 %). The overall detection rate of CE and DBE was 87.6 % and 92 %, respectively. Following CE and DBE, 14 patients (10.6 %) were diagnosed with CD-related complications such as ulcerative jejunitis, strictures and malignancy. Seven patients (5.3 %) died during follow-up, with five of these deaths directly attributed to CD. Older age, weight loss and anaemia were associated with poor outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The sequential approach of CE and DBE identified CD-related complications in almost 1 in 10 patients with nonresponsive or refractory CD. Older patients with persistent villous atrophy, weight loss and anaemia require close monitoring to help with the early diagnosis and management of complications.

Fecal calprotectin measurement as a biomarker of severe disease phenotype in celiac disease and non-celiac enteropathies

BACKGROUND

Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a non-invasive biomarker of gut inflammation, but its role in celiac disease (CD) and non-celiac enteropathies (NCEs) is undefined.

AIMS

To retrospectively evaluate FC in patients with CD and NCEs as a tool for assessing disease activity and predicting long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with uncomplicated and complicated CD, and NCEs with data on FC, evaluated at our center between June-2008 and December-2023, were enrolled. The relationship between elevated FC (>50 mg/kg) and disease activity was statistically analysed and Cox regression adjusted for age and sex was used to compare development of complications and mortality in patients with elevated and normal FC.

RESULTS

177 patients (109F, mean age at diagnosis 39±20 years, 132 CD, 17 complicated CD, 28 NCEs) were enrolled. 55 patients had elevated FC, which was associated with lack of clinical and histological response to therapy (both p < 0.001). During a median follow-up of 103 months (IQR 54-176), 22 patients developed complications (15.4 %) and 21 died (11.9 %). Elevated FC was significantly more common in complicated CD (70.6 %) and NCEs (67.9 %) than in uncomplicated CD (18.2 %), p < 0.001. Elevated FC was independently predictive of developing complications (HR 4.8,95 %CI 1.4-17.7, p = 0.01) and mortality (HR 4.8,95 %CI 1.6-14.3, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

FC is a promising non-invasive biomarker for assessing disease severity and long-term outcomes in CD and NCEs.

Refractory Celiac Disease: What the Gastroenterologist Should Know

Fewer than 1% of patients with celiac disease (CD) will develop refractory CD (RCD). As such, most gastroenterologists might never need to manage patients with RCD. However, all gastroenterologists must be familiarized with the basic concepts of RCD and non-responsive CD (NRCD), since it can present as a severe disease with high mortality, not only due to intestinal failure, but also due to progression to enteropathy-associated T cell lymphoma (EATL) and a higher susceptibility to life-threatening infections. The diagnostic workup and differential diagnosis with other causes of gastrointestinal symptoms and villous atrophy, as well as the differentiation between type I and II RCD, are complex, and may require specialized laboratories and reference hospitals. Immunosuppression is efficient in the milder RCDI; however, the treatment of RCDII falls short, with current options probably only providing transient clinical improvement and delaying EATL development. This review summarizes the current diagnostic and therapeutic approach for patients with RCD that all doctors that manage patients with CD should know.

Evolution in coeliac disease diagnosis and management

The traditional gut-centric view of coeliac disease is evolving as immune and genetic insights underscore the central importance of a systemic, T cell immune response to gluten in disease pathogenesis. As the field increasingly recognize the limitations of small intestinal histology as the diagnostic standard, data supporting the accuracy of an immune (serologic) diagnosis of coeliac disease - well demonstrated in children - are growing for adults. Novel biomarkers such as interleukin-2 that identify the gluten-specific T cell demonstrate high sensitivity and specificity for coeliac disease and offer the potential for a diagnostic approach that avoids the need for gluten challenge. Asymptomatic disease and manifestations outside the gut pose considerable challenges for diagnosis using a case-finding strategy and enthusiasm for population screening is growing. The gluten-free diet remains a highly restrictive treatment and there is a paucity of controlled data to inform a safe gluten intake threshold. Ongoing symptoms and enteropathy are common and require systematic evaluation. Slowly-responsive disease is prevalent in the older patient diagnosed with coeliac disease, and super-sensitivity to gluten is an emerging concept that may explain many cases of nonresponsive disease. While there is great interest in developing novel therapies for coeliac disease, no drug has yet been registered. Efficacy studies are generally assessing drugs in patients with treated coeliac disease who undergo gluten challenge or in patients with nonresponsive disease; however, substantial questions remain around specific endpoints relevant for patients, clinicians and regulatory agencies and optimal trial design. Novel immune tools are providing informative readouts for clinical trials and are now shaping their design.

Budesonide Induces Favourable Histologic and Symptomatic Recovery in Patients with Non-responsive and Refractory Coeliac Disease When Given in an Open Capsule Format

INTRODUCTION

Non-responsive coeliac disease (NRCD), where symptoms and enteropathy persist despite a prolonged gluten-free diet (GFD), is common. Refractory coeliac disease (RCD), characterised by malabsorption and extensive enteropathy, is rare but serious. In both, treatment options are limited. Topical budesonide may help and an open capsule format promoting proximal small intestinal delivery may be advantageous.

AIM

To describe the effect of budesonide and its presentation on mucosal healing, symptoms, and tolerability in NRCD and RCD.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of NRCD and RCD patients who received budesonide for enteropathy despite a strict GFD for over 12 months. Primary outcome was improvement in histology. Symptoms and adverse treatment effects were recorded.

RESULTS

50 patients with NRCD (n = 14; 86% F), RCD type 1 (n = 30; 60% F), and RCD type 2 (n = 6 based on aberrant duodenal T cells; 33% F) were identified. Common RCD symptoms were diarrhoea (68%), fatigue (40%), and weight loss (34%). 16 received closed capsule budesonide (CCB) 9 mg OD and 35 open capsule budesonide (OCB) 3 mg 3 times a day. Complete and partial mucosal healing was significantly higher after OCB compared to CCB (p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). Symptom improvement was also significantly higher after OCB compared to CCB (p = 0.002, Mann-Whitney U test). Side effects were mild and self-limiting and were reported in 25% of both cohorts.

CONCLUSION

OCB was well tolerated and associated with improvements in enteropathy (83%) and symptoms (90%) in NRCD and RCD. Our findings support OCB as the preferred 1st-line therapy for NRCD and RCD type 1.

Clinical Presentation and Spectrum of Gluten Symptomatology in Celiac Disease

Views on the clinical presentation and symptomatology of celiac disease have evolved alongside advances in disease detection and understanding of disease pathogenesis. Although historically regarded as a pediatric illness characterized by malabsorption, it is now better viewed as an immune illness of gluten-specific T cells with systemic manifestations affecting all ages. Its broad presentation, including frequent extraintestinal manifestations and asymptomatic disease, contributes to suboptimal disease detection. Adverse symptoms greatly impact patient quality of life and can result from chronic gluten exposure in untreated disease or those poorly responsive to the gluten-free diet. They can also present as acute symptoms after episodic gluten exposure. Functional gastrointestinal disease is a common comorbidity. Biomarkers like interleukin-2 that are highly sensitive and specific for celiac disease highlight a role for gluten-specific T cells in acute gluten symptomatology. A mechanistic understanding of symptoms will inform approaches to better measure and treat them effectively.

Flow cytometry for the assessment and monitoring of aberrant intraepithelial lymphocytes in non-responsive celiac disease and non-celiac enteropathies

BACKGROUND

Few data are available on flow cytometry (FC) for monitoring intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) in refractory celiac disease (RCD), non-responsive celiac disease (NRCD), and non-celiac enteropathies (NCEs).

AIMS

1) To investigate the significance of monitoring IELs immunophenotype with FC in patients with NRCD, RCD and NCEs; 2) to evaluate FC concordance with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and γ-TCR clonality analysis.

METHODS

Patients investigated between January-2012 and February-2023 were divided into two groups: 1)confirmed RCD or NRCD being investigated for persistent symptoms and suspected complications of celiac disease (CD); 2)NCEs lacking clinical/histological response. Clinical/molecular features and outcomes were retrospectively collected and analysed according to presence/absence of aberrant IELs on FC (cut-off≥20 % CD103+sCD3-CD8-iCD3+ IELs).

RESULTS

52 patients (18 RCD,21 NRCD,13 NCEs; 38F, 55±13 years; median follow-up 30 months, IQR 2-58) underwent 100 FC IELs determinations. 22/52 had ≥2 FC determinations and IEL phenotype remained unchanged over time in all them (κ=1.00). Aberrant IEL phenotype in CD was associated with increased mortality (HR 4.2, 95 % CI 1.5-11.9, p < 0.01). No patients with NCEs had an aberrant IEL phenotype at FC, although 3/13 developed lymphoma and 4/13 died. Concordance of FC was fair with both IHC (κ=0.40) and γ-TCR clonality analysis (κ=0.22).

CONCLUSION

FC is accurate for assessing and monitoring IEL phenotype and providing important prognostic information in celiac patients. Further study is needed on its role in NCEs.

Stool Gluten Peptide Detection Is Superior to Urinary Analysis, Coeliac Serology, Dietary Adherence Scores and Symptoms in the Detection of Intermittent Gluten Exposure in Coeliac Disease: A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Low-Dose Gluten Challenge Study

Monitoring adherence to a gluten-free diet is an important goal of coeliac disease management. Urine and stool gluten immunogenic peptide (GIP) assays provide an objective readout of gluten ingestion, with the former favoured due to its convenience and acceptability. This study assessed stool GIP excretion after low-dose gluten challenge designed to mimic accidental gluten exposure. A total of 52 coeliac participants undertook a randomised, double-blind gluten (50-1000 mg) or placebo challenge. Stool and urinary GIP, serology, dietary adherence and symptoms were assessed. Stool GIP was 100% sensitive for gluten intake ≥250 mg and 71% for 50 mg. Peak GIP detection was 12-36 h after gluten exposure. The mean stool GIP after 1000 mg gluten ingestion remained above the limit of quantification for 5 days. Urine GIP assessment had poor sensitivity for GIP excretion compared to stool. Serology, dietary adherence score and symptoms did not correlate with gluten excretion during lead-in. We conclude that stool GIP detection is highly sensitive, with levels related to gluten dose and time from ingestion. Weekly or bi-weekly testing will detect low-level exposure more effectively than urine GIP assessments or traditional methods. In this seronegative, apparently well-treated cohort, a high frequency of baseline-positive GIP suggests ongoing gluten exposure, but the assessment of patient behaviour and assay specificity is needed.

Emerging Pharmaceutical Therapies to Address the Inadequacy of a Gluten-Free Diet for Celiac Disease

Celiac disease (CeD) is a chronic autoimmune disorder triggered by the ingestion of gluten, affecting around 1% of the global population. It is a multifactorial disease involving both genetics and environmental factors. Nowadays, the only available treatment for CeD is a life-long gluten-free diet (GFD), which can cause a significant burden for patients, since symptoms and mucosal injury can persist despite apparent compliance with a GFD. This could also lead to psychological consequences and affect the quality of life of these patients. Thankfully, recent advances in understanding the pathogenesis of CeD and the availability of various targets have made it feasible to explore pharmaceutical treatments specific to CeD. Recently, the FDA has highlighted the unmet needs of adult patients on a GFD who experience ongoing symptoms attributed to CeD and also show persistent duodenal villous atrophy. This review will outline the limitations of a GFD, describe the targets of potential novel treatment of CeD and provide an overview of the primary clinical trials involving oral and injectable agents for a non-dietary treatment of CeD.

Comparison of weekly gluten immunogenic peptide measurement and conventional tools to assess adherence to the gluten-free diet in celiac disease: An observational prospective study

BACKGROUND

Adherence to the gluten-free diet (GFD) is critical to achieving symptom control and mucosal healing in celiac disease (CeD), but its assessment is difficult.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare stool gluten immunogenic peptides (GIPs) measurements over a 4-wk period with conventional tools commonly used to monitor compliance with a GFD.

METHODS

Consecutive adult patients with CeD attending the Small Bowel Section of the Buenos Aires Gastroenterology Hospital were invited to this observational study and were instructed to collect stool samples on Fridays for 4 consecutive weeks. Weekly mean stool GIP concentration was measured was estimated. GIP results were compared with a self-assessment scale of adherence, specific CeD serology, the celiac symptom index, and the assessment by an expert dietitian.

RESULTS

Fifty-three CeD patients were enrolled and those with stool GIP ≥0.65 μg/g/wk (n = 13; 24.5%) had higher serum concentrations of IgA deamidated gliadin peptides (DGPs) antibodies [69 (29-109) compared with 14 (13-29); P = 0.0005] and IgA tissue transglutaminase [42 (14-200) compared with 10 (7-16); P = 0.02], higher proportion of cases with IgA DGP antibodies >20 AU/mL (84.6% compared with 33.3%; P = 0.002), and a higher self-estimated adherence score [5 (4-9) compared with 9 (7-10); P = 0.003]. GIP did not correlate with celiac symptom index scores (55.6% compared with 30.8%; P = 0.9). Expert dietitian assessment identified 69% [odds ratio (OR): 5.25; 95% CI: 1.1-27.2; P = 0.01] of nonadherent cases when high stool GIP. Logistic regression analysis determined that IgA DGP (adjusted OR: 1.1; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11; P = 0.02) and males (adjusted OR: 28.3; 95% CI: 1.1-722.6; P = 0.04) were independently associated with excessive gluten exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly stool GIP identifies gluten exposure that is not always detected by commonly used GFD adherence assessment methods. The higher the concentration of stool GIP, the better the predictive value of serology and dietitian interviews. Stool GIP is a useful and practical test for GFD monitoring, particularly for risky gluten exposure in real-life scenarios.

Persistent villous atrophy predicts development of complications and mortality in adult patients with coeliac disease: a multicentre longitudinal cohort study and development of a score to identify high-risk patients

OBJECTIVE

Persistent villous atrophy (pVA) in coeliac disease (CD) despite a gluten-free diet (GFD) has unclear meaning. We aimed to (i) study the relationship between pVA and long-term outcomes and (ii) develop a score to identify patients at risk of pVA.

DESIGN

This is a multicentre retrospective-prospective study consisting of a study cohort (cohort 1) and an external validation cohort (cohort 2) of patients with biopsy-proven CD diagnosed between 2000 and 2021. Cohort 1 was used to (i) compare long-term outcomes between patients with and without pVA (Marsh ≥3a) at follow-up biopsy and (ii) to develop a score to evaluate the risk of pVA, which was validated in cohort 2.

RESULTS

Of 2211 patients, 694 (31%) underwent follow-up duodenal biopsy and were included in the study cohort (491F, 44±16 years). 157/694 (23%) had pVA. Risk of complications (HR 9.53, 95% CI 4.77 to 19.04, p<0.001) and mortality (HR 2.93, 95% CI 1.43 to 6.02, p<0.01) were increased in patients with pVA. A 5-point score was developed and externally validated (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89) to stratify patients by risk of pVA: low (0-1 points, 5% pVA), intermediate (2 points, 16% pVA) and high (3-5 points, 73% pVA). Predictors for pVA used in the score were age at diagnosis ≥45 years (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.21 to 3.34, p<0.01), classical pattern of CD (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.28 to 3.58, p<0.01), lack of clinical response to GFD (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.43 to 4.01, p<0.001) and poor GFD adherence (OR 48.9, 95% CI 26.1 to 91.8, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Risk of complications and mortality were increased in patients with pVA. We developed a score to identify patients at risk of pVA and in need of histological reassessment and closer follow-up.

A dietitian-led coeliac service helps to identify and reduce involuntary gluten ingestion with subsequent reduction in the frequency of repeat endoscopies

BACKGROUND

Dietitian-led coeliac clinics have the potential to be a cost-effective way of monitoring patients living with coeliac disease (CD). The aim of this service evaluation was to explore the impact of a dietitian-led coeliac clinic on gluten-free diet (GFD) adherence and the frequency of endoscopies with repeat duodenal biopsies.

METHODS

Adults with biopsy-proven CD were transferred to a new dietitian-led coeliac clinic where data were collected from medical records and analysed using SPSS. GFD adherence was assessed by a specialist dietitian, specialist nurse, consultant gastroenterologists and a validated GFD adherence questionnaire. Repeat duodenal biopsy findings were compared with the most recent dietitian GFD adherence assessment. Project and ethics approval was granted by the hospital trust and affiliated university.

RESULTS

Data from 170 patients (White: 51%, South Asian: 45%) are presented, with most being 35-64 years old (61%). Specialist dietitian assessments identified 67 (39%) of patients were adhering to the GFD, whereas prior gastroenterologist or coeliac nurse assessments identified 122 (72%) (p < 0.001) and the validated GFD adherence questionnaire identified 97 (57%) (p < 0.001). Dietitian assessments identified involuntary gluten consumption in 39/104 (38%) of those who self-reported GFD adherence, consequently avoiding the need for nine endoscopies with repeat duodenal biopsies once patients had received dietary education from the dietitian. On follow-up, within the dietitian-led coeliac clinic, significantly fewer patients consumed gluten involuntarily (14%, p < 0.001). In addition, a reduction in voluntary gluten consumption was observed from three to five to one to two times per month (p < 0.001) in 66 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The dietitian-led coeliac clinic helped to identify involuntary gluten ingestion, avoid repeat endoscopies with duodenal biopsies and was associated with significantly improved GFD adherence.

The Gluten-Free Diet for Celiac Disease: Critical Insights to Better Understand Clinical Outcomes

The gluten-free diet (GFD) remains a complex paradigm in managing celiac disease (CeD) in children and adults, and there are many reasons why GFD adherence should be strict to improve outcomes. However, this is a challenging task for patients, since they need to have access to quality healthcare resources that facilitate optimal GFD adherence. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the GFD, tackling coexisting nutritional deficiencies, and dealing with complex situations, such as seronegative CeD or non-responsive CeD, all require the involvement of a multidisciplinary team. The short- and long-term follow-up of CeD patients should preferably be performed by a combined Gastroenterology and Nutrition service with well-defined quality standards and the multidisciplinary involvement of physicians, nurses, dietitians, and psychologists. Nutritional advice and counseling by an experienced dietitian can reduce the costs associated with long-term follow-up of CeD patients. Likewise, psychological interventions may be essential in specific scenarios where implementing and sustaining a lifelong GFD can cause a significant psychological burden for patients. This manuscript aims to provide guidelines to improve clinical practice in the follow-up and monitoring of CeD patients and provide information on the nutritional risks of an ill-advised GFD. Clinicians, biochemists, food technologists, dietitians, and psychologists with a global view of the disease have been involved in its writing.

Updates in the diagnosis and management of coeliac disease

Coeliac disease is a common autoimmune disorder induced by ingesting gluten, the protein component of wheat, barley, and rye. It is estimated that one-in-hundred people worldwide have coeliac disease, of whom the majority remain undiagnosed. Coeliac disease is characterized by a wide range of gastrointestinal and extraintestinal symptoms but can also present asymptomatically. Diagnosing coeliac disease depends on the concordance of clinical, serological and histopathological data. However, the diagnosis can be challenging and frequently overlooked. Undiagnosed coeliac disease is associated with an increased risk of complications and detrimental effects on quality of life. Early diagnosis and treatment of coeliac disease are necessary to reduce the risk of long-term complications.