The dipeptide monoester prodrugs of floxuridine and gemcitabine-feasibility of orally administrable nucleoside analogs

Mechanisms of gemcitabine oral absorption as determined by in situ intestinal perfusions in mice

Gemcitabine is a widely used chemotherapeutic drug that is administered via intravenous infusion due to a low oral bioavailability of only 10%. This low oral bioavailability is believed to be the result of gemcitabine's low intestinal permeability and oral absorption, followed by significant presystemic metabolism. In the present study, we sought to define the mechanisms of gemcitabine intestinal permeability, the potential for saturation of intestinal uptake, and the transporter(s) responsible for mediating the oral absorption of drug using in situ single-pass intestinal perfusions in mice. Concentration-dependent studies were performed for gemcitabine over 0.5-2000 μM, along with studies of 5 μM gemcitabine in a sodium-containing buffer ± thymidine (which can inhibit concentrative (i.e., CNT1 and CNT3) and equilibrative (i.e., ENT1 and ENT2) nucleoside transporters) or dilazep (which can inhibit ENT1 and ENT2), or in a sodium-free buffer (which can inhibit CNT1 and CNT3). Our findings demonstrated that gemcitabine was, in fact, a high-permeability drug in the intestine at low concentrations, that jejunal uptake of gemcitabine was saturable and mediated almost exclusively by nucleoside transporters, and that jejunal flux was mediated by both high-affinity, low-capacity (K_m = 27.4 µM, V_max = 3.6 pmol/cm²/s) and low-affinity, high-capacity (K_m = 700 µM, V_max = 35.9 pmol/cm²/s) transport systems. Thus, CNTs and ENTs at the apical membrane allow for gemcitabine uptake from the lumen to enterocyte, whereas ENTs at the basolateral membrane allow for gemcitabine efflux from the enterocyte to portal venous blood.

Pancreatic Cancer Chemoresistance to Gemcitabine

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), commonly referred to as pancreatic cancer, ranks among the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in the Western world due to disease presentation at an advanced stage, early metastasis and generally a very limited response to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Gemcitabine remains a cornerstone of PDAC treatment in all stages of the disease despite suboptimal clinical effects primarily caused by molecular mechanisms limiting its cellular uptake and activation and overall efficacy, as well as the development of chemoresistance within weeks of treatment initiation. To circumvent gemcitabine resistance in PDAC, several novel therapeutic approaches, including chemical modifications of the gemcitabine molecule generating numerous new prodrugs, as well as new entrapment designs of gemcitabine in colloidal systems such as nanoparticles and liposomes, are currently being investigated. Many of these approaches are reported to be more efficient than the parent gemcitabine molecule when tested in cellular systems and in vivo in murine tumor model systems; however, although promising, their translation to clinical use is still in a very early phase. This review discusses gemcitabine metabolism, activation and chemoresistance entities in the gemcitabine cytotoxicity pathway and provides an overview of approaches to override chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer.

Potential Development of Tumor-Targeted Oral Anti-Cancer Prodrugs: Amino Acid and Dipeptide Monoester Prodrugs of Gemcitabine

One of the main obstacles for cancer therapies is to deliver medicines effectively to target sites. Since stroma cells are developed around tumors, chemotherapeutic agents have to go through stroma cells in order to reach tumors. As a method to improve drug delivery to the tumor site, a prodrug approach for gemcitabine was adopted. Amino acid and dipeptide monoester prodrugs of gemcitabine were synthesized and their chemical stability in buffers, resistance to thymidine phosphorylase and cytidine deaminase, antiproliferative activity, and uptake/permeability in HFF cells as a surrogate to stroma cells were determined and compared to their parent drug, gemcitabine. The activation of all gemcitabine prodrugs was faster in pancreatic cell homogenates than their hydrolysis in buffer, suggesting enzymatic action. All prodrugs exhibited great stability in HFF cell homogenate, enhanced resistance to glycosidic bond metabolism by thymidine phosphorylase, and deamination by cytidine deaminase compared to their parent drug. All gemcitabine prodrugs exhibited higher uptake in HFF cells and better permeability across HFF monolayers than gemcitabine, suggesting a better delivery to tumor sites. Cell antiproliferative assays in Panc-1 and Capan-2 pancreatic ductal cell lines indicated that the gemcitabine prodrugs were more potent than their parent drug gemcitabine. The transport and enzymatic profiles of gemcitabine prodrugs suggest their potential for delayed enzymatic bioconversion and enhanced resistance to metabolic enzymes, as well as for enhanced drug delivery to tumor sites, and cytotoxic activity in cancer cells. These attributes would facilitate the prolonged systemic circulation and improved therapeutic efficacy of gemcitabine prodrugs.

Advances in oral delivery of anti-cancer prodrugs

INTRODUCTION

Most anticancer drugs have poor aqueous solubility and low permeability across the gastrointestinal tract. Furthermore, extensive efflux by P-glycoproteins (P-gp) in the small intestine also limits the efficient delivery of anticancer drugs via oral route. Area covered: This review explores the prodrug strategy for oral delivery of anticancer drugs. Different categories of oral anticancer prodrugs along with recent clinical studies have been comprehensively reviewed here. Furthermore, novel anticancer prodrugs such as polymer-prodrugs and lipid-prodrugs have been discussed in detail. Finally, various nanocarrier-based approaches employed for oral delivery of anticancer prodrugs have also been discussed. Expert opinion: Premature degradation of anticancer prodrugs in the gastrointestinal tract could lead to variable pharmacokinetics and undesired toxicity. Despite their increased aqueous solubility, the oral bioavailability of several anticancer prodrugs are limited by their poor permeability across the gastrointestinal tract. These limitations can be overcome by the use of functional excipients (polymers, lipids, amino acids/dipeptides), which are specifically absorbed via transporters and receptor-mediated endocytosis. Oral delivery of anticancer prodrugs using nanocarrier-based drug delivery system is a recent development; however it should be justified based on the comparative advantages of encapsulating prodrug in a nanocarrier versus the use of anticancer prodrug molecule itself.

ALPPL2 Aptamer-Mediated Targeted Delivery of 5-Fluoro-2'-Deoxyuridine to Pancreatic Cancer

Nucleoside analogues are the most promising drugs for the treatment of pancreatic cancer to date. However, their use is often limited due to toxic side effects. Aptamer-mediated targeted delivery of these drugs to cancer cells could maximize their effectiveness and concomitantly minimize the toxic side effects by reducing uptake into normal cells. Previously, we identified a pancreatic cancer-specific, nuclease-resistant RNA aptamer, SQ2, which binds to alkaline phosphatase placental-like 2 (ALPPL2), a putative biomarker for pancreatic cancer. In this study, we demonstrate that the aptamer can be internalized into pancreatic cancer cells and can thus be used for the targeted delivery of therapeutics. Using the aptamer as a ligand, we established that glycophosphatidylinositol-anchored ALPPL2 is internalized by the cells through clathrin-independent and caveolae-dependent or dynamin-mediated cell-type-dependent pathways. Finally, we show that SQ2 can deliver nucleoside drug 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine specifically to ALPPL2-expressing pancreatic cancer cells, inhibiting cell proliferation.

How drugs get into cells: tested and testable predictions to help discriminate between transporter-mediated uptake and lipoidal bilayer diffusion

One approach to experimental science involves creating hypotheses, then testing them by varying one or more independent variables, and assessing the effects of this variation on the processes of interest. We use this strategy to compare the intellectual status and available evidence for two models or views of mechanisms of transmembrane drug transport into intact biological cells. One (BDII) asserts that lipoidal phospholipid Bilayer Diffusion Is Important, while a second (PBIN) proposes that in normal intact cells Phospholipid Bilayer diffusion Is Negligible (i.e., may be neglected quantitatively), because evolution selected against it, and with transmembrane drug transport being effected by genetically encoded proteinaceous carriers or pores, whose “natural” biological roles, and substrates are based in intermediary metabolism. Despite a recent review elsewhere, we can find no evidence able to support BDII as we can find no experiments in intact cells in which phospholipid bilayer diffusion was either varied independently or measured directly (although there are many papers where it was inferred by seeing a covariation of other dependent variables). By contrast, we find an abundance of evidence showing cases in which changes in the activities of named and genetically identified transporters led to measurable changes in the rate or extent of drug uptake. PBIN also has considerable predictive power, and accounts readily for the large differences in drug uptake between tissues, cells and species, in accounting for the metabolite-likeness of marketed drugs, in pharmacogenomics, and in providing a straightforward explanation for the late-stage appearance of toxicity and of lack of efficacy during drug discovery programmes despite macroscopically adequate pharmacokinetics. Consequently, the view that Phospholipid Bilayer diffusion Is Negligible (PBIN) provides a starting hypothesis for assessing cellular drug uptake that is much better supported by the available evidence, and is both more productive and more predictive.

Modern prodrug design for targeted oral drug delivery

The molecular information that became available over the past two decades significantly influenced the field of drug design and delivery at large, and the prodrug approach in particular. While the traditional prodrug approach was aimed at altering various physiochemical parameters, e.g., lipophilicity and charge state, the modern approach to prodrug design considers molecular/cellular factors, e.g., membrane influx/efflux transporters and cellular protein expression and distribution. This novel targeted-prodrug approach is aimed to exploit carrier-mediated transport for enhanced intestinal permeability, as well as specific enzymes to promote activation of the prodrug and liberation of the free parent drug. The purpose of this article is to provide a concise overview of this modern prodrug approach, with useful successful examples for its utilization. In the past the prodrug approach used to be viewed as a last option strategy, after all other possible solutions were exhausted; nowadays this is no longer the case, and in fact, the prodrug approach should be considered already in the very earliest development stages. Indeed, the prodrug approach becomes more and more popular and successful. A mechanistic prodrug design that aims to allow intestinal permeability by specific transporters, as well as activation by specific enzymes, may greatly improve the prodrug efficiency, and allow for novel oral treatment options.