1
|
Lausch A, Selsam P, Pause M, Bumberger J. Monitoring vegetation- and geodiversity with remote sensing and traits. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS. SERIES A, MATHEMATICAL, PHYSICAL, AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES 2024; 382:20230058. [PMID: 38342219 PMCID: PMC10859235 DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2023.0058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
Geodiversity has shaped and structured the Earth's surface at all spatio-temporal scales, not only through long-term processes but also through medium- and short-term processes. Geodiversity is, therefore, a key control and regulating variable in the overall development of landscapes and biodiversity. However, climate change and land use intensity are leading to major changes and disturbances in bio- and geodiversity. For sustainable ecosystem management, temporal, economically viable and standardized monitoring is needed to monitor and model the effects and changes in vegetation- and geodiversity. RS approaches have been used for this purpose for decades. However, to understand in detail how RS approaches capture vegetation- and geodiversity, the aim of this paper is to describe how five features of vegetation- and geodiversity are captured using RS technologies, namely: (i) trait diversity, (ii) phylogenetic/genese diversity, (iii) structural diversity, (iv) taxonomic diversity and (v) functional diversity. Trait diversity is essential for establishing the other four. Traits provide a crucial interface between in situ, close-range, aerial and space-based RS monitoring approaches. The trait approach allows complex data of different types and formats to be linked using the latest semantic data integration techniques, which will enable ecosystem integrity monitoring and modelling in the future. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Geodiversity for science and society'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Lausch
- Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Physical Geography and Geoecology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Von-Seckendorff-Platz 4, 06120 Halle, Germany
- Department of Architecture, Facility Management and Geoinformation, Institute for Geoinformation and Surveying, Bauhausstraße 8, 06846 Dessau, Germany
| | - Peter Selsam
- Department of Monitoring and Exploration Technologies, and
| | - Marion Pause
- Department of Architecture, Facility Management and Geoinformation, Institute for Geoinformation and Surveying, Bauhausstraße 8, 06846 Dessau, Germany
| | - Jan Bumberger
- Department of Monitoring and Exploration Technologies, and
- Research Data Management-RDM, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research UFZ, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstraße 4, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schrodt F, Vernham G, Bailey J, Field R, Gordon JE, Gray M, Hjort J, Hoorn C, Hunter Jr. ML, Larwood J, Lausch A, Monge-Ganuzas M, Miller S, van Ree D, Seijmonsbergen AC, Zarnetske PL, Daniel Kissling W. The status and future of essential geodiversity variables. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS. SERIES A, MATHEMATICAL, PHYSICAL, AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES 2024; 382:20230052. [PMID: 38342208 PMCID: PMC10859226 DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2023.0052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
Rapid environmental change, natural resource overconsumption and increasing concerns about ecological sustainability have led to the development of 'Essential Variables' (EVs). EVs are harmonized data products to inform policy and to enable effective management of natural resources by monitoring global changes. Recent years have seen the instigation of new EVs beyond those established for climate, oceans and biodiversity (ECVs, EOVs and EBVs), including Essential Geodiversity Variables (EGVs). EGVs aim to consistently quantify and monitor heterogeneity of Earth-surface and subsurface abiotic features, including geology, geomorphology, hydrology and pedology. Here we assess the status and future development of EGVs to better incorporate geodiversity into policy and sustainable management of natural resources. Getting EGVs operational requires better consensus on defining geodiversity, investments into a governance structure and open platform for curating the development of EGVs, advances in harmonizing in situ measurements and linking heterogeneous databases, and development of open and accessible computational workflows for global digital mapping using machine-learning techniques. Cross-disciplinary collaboration and partnerships with governmental and private organizations are needed to ensure the successful development and uptake of EGVs across science and policy. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Geodiversity for science and society'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Schrodt
- School of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Grant Vernham
- School of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Joseph Bailey
- Department of Biology, Anglia Ruskin University - Cambridge Campus, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB1 1PT, UK
| | - Richard Field
- School of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| | - John E. Gordon
- School of Geography and Sustainable Development, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY169AL, UK
| | - Murray Gray
- Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
| | - Jan Hjort
- Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu 90570, Finland
| | - Carina Hoorn
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1000 GG, The Netherlands
| | - Malcom L. Hunter Jr.
- Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Conservation Biology, University of Maine, Maine, USA
| | - Jonathan Larwood
- Strategy and Governance, Natural England, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire PE2 8YY, UK
| | - Angela Lausch
- Computational Landscape Ecology, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Leipzig, Saxony 04318, Germany
| | - Manu Monge-Ganuzas
- Geoheritage Commission, Spanish Geological Society, Busturia, Biscay 48350, Spain
| | - Stephanie Miller
- School of Biology and Ecology; Mitchell Center for Sustainability Solutions, The University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469-5751, USA
| | - Derk van Ree
- Geo-engineering, Deltares, Delft 2600 MH, The Netherlands
- Environmental Economics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Faculteit der Betawetenschappen, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arie Christoffel Seijmonsbergen
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1090 GE, The Netherlands
| | - Phoebe L. Zarnetske
- Department of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1312, USA
| | - W. Daniel Kissling
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1090 GE, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hjort J, Seijmonsbergen AC, Kemppinen J, Tukiainen H, Maliniemi T, Gordon JE, Alahuhta J, Gray M. Towards a taxonomy of geodiversity. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS. SERIES A, MATHEMATICAL, PHYSICAL, AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES 2024; 382:20230060. [PMID: 38342205 PMCID: PMC10859227 DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2023.0060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
Geodiversity is a topical concept in earth and environmental sciences. Geodiversity information is needed to conserve nature, use ecosystem services and achieve sustainable development goals. Despite the increasing demand for geodiversity data, there exists no comprehensive system for categorizing geodiversity. Here, we present a hierarchically structured taxonomy that is potentially applicable in mapping and quantifying geodiversity across different regions, environments and scales. In this taxonomy, the main components of geodiversity are geology, geomorphology, hydrology and pedology. We propose a six-level hierarchical system where the components of geodiversity are classified at progressively lower taxonomic levels based on their genesis, physical-chemical properties and morphology. This comprehensive taxonomy can be used to compile geodiversity information for scientific research and various applications of value to society and nature conservation. Ultimately, this hierarchical system is the first step towards developing a global geodiversity taxonomy. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Geodiversity for science and society'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Hjort
- Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, Pentti Kaiteran katu 1, 90570 Oulu, Finland
| | - Arie C. Seijmonsbergen
- Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94240, 1090GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Julia Kemppinen
- Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, Pentti Kaiteran katu 1, 90570 Oulu, Finland
| | - Helena Tukiainen
- Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, Pentti Kaiteran katu 1, 90570 Oulu, Finland
| | - Tuija Maliniemi
- Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, Pentti Kaiteran katu 1, 90570 Oulu, Finland
| | - John E. Gordon
- School of Geography and Sustainable Development,University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9AL, UK
| | - Janne Alahuhta
- Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, Pentti Kaiteran katu 1, 90570 Oulu, Finland
| | - Murray Gray
- School of Geography, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Toivanen M, Maliniemi T, Hjort J, Salminen H, Ala-Hulkko T, Kemppinen J, Karjalainen O, Poturalska A, Kiilunen P, Snåre H, Leppiniemi O, Makopoulou E, Alahuhta J, Tukiainen H. Geodiversity data for Europe. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS. SERIES A, MATHEMATICAL, PHYSICAL, AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES 2024; 382:20230173. [PMID: 38342206 PMCID: PMC10859234 DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2023.0173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
Geodiversity is an essential part of nature's diversity. However, geodiversity is insufficiently understood in terms of its spatial distribution and its relationship to biodiversity over large spatial extents. Here, we present European geodiversity data at resolutions of 1 km and 10 km. We assess terrestrial geodiversity quantitatively as a richness variable (georichness) using a commonly employed grid-based approach. The data incorporate aspects of geological, pedological, geomorphological and hydrological diversity, which are also available as separate richness variables. To evaluate the data, we correlated European georichness with empirically tested national georichness data from Finland, revealing a positive correlation at both 1 km (rp = 0.37, p < 0.001) and 10 km (rp = 0.59, p < 0.001) resolutions. We also demonstrate potential uses of the European data by correlating georichness with vascular plant species richness in two contrasting example areas: Finland and Switzerland. The positive correlations between georichness and species richness in Finland (rp = 0.34, p < 0.001) and Switzerland (rp = 0.26, p < 0.001) further support the use of our data in geodiversity-biodiversity research. Moreover, there is great potential beyond geodiversity-biodiversity questions, as the data can be exploited across different regions, ecosystems and scales. These geodiversity data provide an insight on abiotic diversity in Europe and establish a quantitative large-scale geodiversity assessment method applicable worldwide. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Geodiversity for science and society'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Toivanen
- Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland
| | - T. Maliniemi
- Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland
| | - J. Hjort
- Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland
| | - H. Salminen
- Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland
| | - T. Ala-Hulkko
- Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland
- Kerttu Saalasti Institute, University of Oulu, Oulu 90014, Finland
| | - J. Kemppinen
- Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland
| | - O. Karjalainen
- Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland
| | - A. Poturalska
- Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland
| | - P. Kiilunen
- Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland
| | - H. Snåre
- Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland
- Finnish Environment Institute, Nature Solutions, Paavo Havaksen Tie 3 Oulu, 90570, Finland
| | - O. Leppiniemi
- Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland
| | - E. Makopoulou
- Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland
| | - J. Alahuhta
- Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland
| | - H. Tukiainen
- Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gray M. Case studies associated with the 10 major geodiversity-related topics. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS. SERIES A, MATHEMATICAL, PHYSICAL, AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES 2024; 382:20230055. [PMID: 38342216 PMCID: PMC10859230 DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2023.0055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
This paper outlines the 10 major topics related to geodiversity that have emerged since the concept was first introduced in 1993, 30 years ago. After a short introduction, each of the 10 topics is then illustrated by a relevant case study. The 10 topics (italics) and their case studies (bold) are as follows: 1. Celebrating, International Geodiversity Day; 2. Measurement/Assessment, Potential role of remote sensing; 3. Natural Capital and Geosystem Services, Coastal geosystem services; 4. Biodiversity, Mangue de Pedra, Brazil; 5. Geomaterials, The circular economy; 6. Geotourism, World's top geotourism sites?; 7. Geoheritage, Landscape restoration; 8. National Geoconservation, Trump golf course and an SSSI, Scotland; 9. World Heritage Sites and Global Geoparks, Azores Global Geopark, Portugal; 10. Sustainability, Xitle Volcano, Mexico City. It is concluded that, given the way in which geodiversity has developed as a concept, leading to new insights and avenues of research and advancing our understanding of the world since its first use, it clearly now constitutes a significant, geoscientific paradigm. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Geodiversity for science and society'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murray Gray
- School of Geography, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mallinis G, Domakinis C, Kokkoris IP, Stefanidis S, Dimopoulos P, Mitsopoulos I. MAES implementation in Greece: Geodiversity. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2023; 342:118324. [PMID: 37311342 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The present study aims to support the Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES) implementation in Greece, by synthesizing an indicator that could be used for abiotic attribute assessments and specifically for geodiversity. Such an indicator can be used not only for reporting obligations under EU initiatives but also for identifying "conservation hotspots". Such areas, characterized by rich geodiversity, are important for supporting biodiversity and other ecosystem services. In addition, identification and mapping of threats to those areas, due to natural or anthropogenic processes, can be used for the introduction or reformation of protective environmental legislation. The geodiversity indicator has been compiled using geological, geomorphological, climatic, pedological and hydrological data layers, while threats to geodiversity have been produced by integrating the sub-indices of erosion, protection level, land degradation, mineral and/or ore extraction activity, and the concentration of wildfire ignition sites. Finally, a bivariate map highlights geodiversity "hotspots" in Greece, which were found to correspond in most cases with locations of rich geodiversity and poor protection from adverse natural or human induced processes, mainly due to the lack of protective legislation. The study's outcomes provide a baseline for scientifically informed decisions for conservation, management and spatial planning, while simultaneously complying with EU and national legislation and strategies for nature conservation and integrated development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgos Mallinis
- Laboratory of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (PERS Lab), School of Rural and Surveying Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-54124, Thessaloniki, Greece.
| | - Christos Domakinis
- Laboratory of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (PERS Lab), School of Rural and Surveying Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-54124, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Environmental and Physical Geography, Greece Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-54124, Thessaloniki, Greece.
| | - Ioannis P Kokkoris
- Laboratory of Botany, Department of Biology, University of Patras, GR-26504, Patras, Greece.
| | - Stefanos Stefanidis
- Laboratory of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (PERS Lab), School of Rural and Surveying Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-54124, Thessaloniki, Greece.
| | - Panayotis Dimopoulos
- Laboratory of Botany, Department of Biology, University of Patras, GR-26504, Patras, Greece.
| | - Ioannis Mitsopoulos
- Natural Environment and Climate Change Agency (N.E.C.C.A.), Ministry of Environment and Energy (MEEN), GR-13677, Athens, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Scale-Specific Prediction of Topsoil Organic Carbon Contents Using Terrain Attributes and SCMaP Soil Reflectance Composites. REMOTE SENSING 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/rs14102295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
There is a growing need for an area-wide knowledge of SOC contents in agricultural soils at the field scale for food security and monitoring long-term changes related to soil health and climate change. In Germany, SOC maps are mostly available with a spatial resolution of 250 m to 1 km2. The nationwide availability of both digital elevation models at various spatial resolutions and multi-temporal satellite imagery enables the derivation of multi-scale terrain attributes and (here: Landsat-based) multi-temporal soil reflectance composites (SRC) as explanatory variables. In the example of a Bavarian test of about 8000 km2, relations between 220 SOC content samples as well as different aggregation levels of the explanatory variables were analyzed for their scale-specific predictive power. The aggregation levels were generated by applying a region-growing segmentation procedure, and the SOC content prediction was realized by the Random Forest algorithm. In doing so, established approaches of (geographic) object-based image analysis (GEOBIA) and machine learning were combined. The modeling results revealed scale-specific differences. Compared to terrain attributes, the use of SRC parameters leads to a significant model improvement at field-related scale levels. The joint use of both terrain attributes and SRC parameters resulted in further model improvements. The best modeling variant is characterized by an accuracy of R2 = 0.84 and RMSE = 1.99.
Collapse
|
8
|
Remote Sensing of Geomorphodiversity Linked to Biodiversity—Part III: Traits, Processes and Remote Sensing Characteristics. REMOTE SENSING 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/rs14092279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Remote sensing (RS) enables a cost-effective, extensive, continuous and standardized monitoring of traits and trait variations of geomorphology and its processes, from the local to the continental scale. To implement and better understand RS techniques and the spectral indicators derived from them in the monitoring of geomorphology, this paper presents a new perspective for the definition and recording of five characteristics of geomorphodiversity with RS, namely: geomorphic genesis diversity, geomorphic trait diversity, geomorphic structural diversity, geomorphic taxonomic diversity, and geomorphic functional diversity. In this respect, geomorphic trait diversity is the cornerstone and is essential for recording the other four characteristics using RS technologies. All five characteristics are discussed in detail in this paper and reinforced with numerous examples from various RS technologies. Methods for classifying the five characteristics of geomorphodiversity using RS, as well as the constraints of monitoring the diversity of geomorphology using RS, are discussed. RS-aided techniques that can be used for monitoring geomorphodiversity in regimes with changing land-use intensity are presented. Further, new approaches of geomorphic traits that enable the monitoring of geomorphodiversity through the valorisation of RS data from multiple missions are discussed as well as the ecosystem integrity approach. Likewise, the approach of monitoring the five characteristics of geomorphodiversity recording with RS is discussed, as are existing approaches for recording spectral geomorhic traits/ trait variation approach and indicators, along with approaches for assessing geomorphodiversity. It is shown that there is no comparable approach with which to define and record the five characteristics of geomorphodiversity using only RS data in the literature. Finally, the importance of the digitization process and the use of data science for research in the field of geomorphology in the 21st century is elucidated and discussed.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
The article demonstrates a method for quantitative-qualitative geodiversity assessment based on core elements of abiotic nature (geology and geomorphology) according to a proposed weight multiplied by the area of spread through the studied region. The territory of the Coromandel Peninsula was selected as a case study due to its diverse geology and geomorphology. The north part of the Peninsula (Port Jackson, Fletcher Bay and Port Charles districts) was chosen because of the variety of rock types (sedimentary and volcanic groups) covering the region, while historical stratovolcano remnants and old sediments provide a good variety of meadow hills and weathered coastal cliffs. Meanwhile, the method utilizes easily accessible data (topographical and geological map) to assess slope angle (morphometry) and rock groups, including their age (geology) to identify areas in the sample region with significant geodiversity values. Moreover, the aim of this research is to make the assessment of geodiversity simpler and more accessible for various parts of the world with minimal required information. In this paper, we provide access to improve and utilize this method in geologically diverse territories to select the best areas for geotourism, geoeducation and geconservation planning.
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhou T, Geng Y, Ji C, Xu X, Wang H, Pan J, Bumberger J, Haase D, Lausch A. Prediction of soil organic carbon and the C:N ratio on a national scale using machine learning and satellite data: A comparison between Sentinel-2, Sentinel-3 and Landsat-8 images. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2021; 755:142661. [PMID: 33059134 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil carbon-to-nitrogen ratio (C:N) are the main indicators of soil quality and health and play an important role in maintaining soil quality. Together with Landsat, the improved spatial and temporal resolution Sentinel sensors provide the potential to investigate soil information on various scales. We analyzed and compared the potential of satellite sensors (Landsat-8, Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3) with various spatial and temporal resolutions to predict SOC content and C:N ratio in Switzerland. Modeling was carried out at four spatial resolutions (800 m, 400 m, 100 m and 20 m) using three machine learning techniques: support vector machine (SVM), boosted regression tree (BRT) and random forest (RF). Soil prediction models were generated in these three machine learners in which 150 soil samples and different combinations of environmental data (topography, climate and satellite imagery) were used as inputs. The prediction results were evaluated by cross-validation. Our results revealed that the model type, modeling resolution and sensor selection greatly influenced outputs. By comparing satellite-based SOC models, the models built by Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 performed the best and the worst, respectively. C:N ratio prediction models based on Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 showed better results than Sentinel-3. However, the prediction models built by Sentinel-3 had competitive or better accuracy at coarse resolutions. The BRT models constructed by all available predictors at a resolution of 100 m obtained the best prediction accuracy of SOC content and C:N ratio; their relative improvements (in terms of R2) compared to models without remote sensing data input were 29.1% and 58.4%, respectively. The results of variable importance revealed that remote sensing variables were the best predictors for our soil prediction models. The predicted maps indicated that the higher SOC content was mainly distributed in the Alps, while the C:N ratio shared a similar distribution pattern with land use and had higher values in forest areas. This study provides useful indicators for a more effective modeling of soil properties on various scales based on satellite imagery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Zhou
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Geography, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany; Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Yajun Geng
- Nanjing Agricultural University, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Weigang 1, 210095 Nanjing, China.
| | - Cheng Ji
- Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Institute of Agricultural Resource and Environmental Sciences, Zhongling Street 50, 210014 Nanjing, China
| | - Xiangrui Xu
- Nanjing Agricultural University, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Weigang 1, 210095 Nanjing, China
| | - Hong Wang
- Anhui Science and Technology University, College of Resource and Environment, Donghua Road 9, 233100 Chuzhou, China
| | - Jianjun Pan
- Nanjing Agricultural University, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Weigang 1, 210095 Nanjing, China
| | - Jan Bumberger
- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department Monitoring and Exploration Technology, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Dagmar Haase
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Geography, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany; Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Angela Lausch
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Geography, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany; Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cavender-Bares J, Reich P, Townsend P, Banerjee A, Butler E, Desai A, Gevens A, Hobbie S, Isbell F, Laliberté E, Meireles JE, Menninger H, Pavlick R, Pinto-Ledezma J, Potter C, Schuman M, Springer N, Stefanski A, Trivedi P, Trowbridge A, Williams L, Willis C, Yang Y. BII-Implementation: The causes and consequences of plant biodiversity across scales in a rapidly changing world. RESEARCH IDEAS AND OUTCOMES 2021. [DOI: 10.3897/rio.7.e63850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The proposed Biology Integration Institute will bring together two major research institutions in the Upper Midwest—the University of Minnesota (UMN) and University of Wisconsin-Madison (UW)—to investigate the causes and consequences of plant biodiversity across scales in a rapidly changing world—from genes and molecules within cells and tissues to communities, ecosystems, landscapes and the biosphere. The Institute focuses on plant biodiversity, defined broadly to encompass the heterogeneity within life that occurs from the smallest to the largest biological scales. A premise of the Institute is that life is envisioned as occurring at different scales nested within several contrasting conceptions of biological hierarchies, defined by the separate but related fields of physiology, evolutionary biology and ecology. The Institute will emphasize the use of ‘spectral biology’—detection of biological properties based on the interaction of light energy with matter—and process-oriented predictive models to investigate the processes by which biological components at one scale give rise to emergent properties at higher scales. Through an iterative process that harnesses cutting edge technologies to observe a suite of carefully designed empirical systems—including the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) and some of the world’s longest running and state-of-the-art global change experiments—the Institute will advance biological understanding and theory of the causes and consequences of changes in biodiversity and at the interface of plant physiology, ecology and evolution.
INTELLECTUAL MERIT
The Institute brings together a diverse, gender-balanced and highly productive team with significant leadership experience that spans biological disciplines and career stages and is poised to integrate biology in new ways. Together, the team will harness the potential of spectral biology, experiments, observations and synthetic modeling in a manner never before possible to transform understanding of how variation within and among biological scales drives plant and ecosystem responses to global change over diurnal, seasonal and millennial time scales. In doing so, it will use and advance state-of-the-art theory. The institute team posits that the designed projects will unearth transformative understanding and biological rules at each of the various scales that will enable an unprecedented capacity to discern the linkages between physiological, ecological and evolutionary processes in relation to the multi-dimensional nature of biodiversity in this time of massive planetary change. A strength of the proposed Institute is that it leverages prior federal investments in research and formalizes partnerships with foreign institutions heavily invested in related biodiversity research. Most of the planned projects leverage existing research initiatives, infrastructure, working groups, experiments, training programs, and public outreach infrastructure, all of which are already highly synergistic and collaborative, and will bring together members of the overall research and training team.
BROADER IMPACTS
A central goal of the proposed Institute is to train the next generation of diverse integrative biologists. Post-doctoral, graduate student and undergraduate trainees, recruited from non-traditional and underrepresented groups, including through formal engagement with Native American communities, will receive a range of mentoring and training opportunities. Annual summer training workshops will be offered at UMN and UW as well as training experiences with the Global Change and Biodiversity Research Priority Program (URPP-GCB) at the University of Zurich (UZH) and through the Canadian Airborne Biodiversity Observatory (CABO). The Institute will engage diverse K-12 audiences, the general public and Native American communities through Market Science modules, Minute Earth videos, a museum exhibit and public engagement and educational activities through the Bell Museum of Natural History, the Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve (CCESR) and the Wisconsin Tribal Conservation Association.
Collapse
|
12
|
Linking the Remote Sensing of Geodiversity and Traits Relevant to Biodiversity—Part II: Geomorphology, Terrain and Surfaces. REMOTE SENSING 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/rs12223690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
The status, changes, and disturbances in geomorphological regimes can be regarded as controlling and regulating factors for biodiversity. Therefore, monitoring geomorphology at local, regional, and global scales is not only necessary to conserve geodiversity, but also to preserve biodiversity, as well as to improve biodiversity conservation and ecosystem management. Numerous remote sensing (RS) approaches and platforms have been used in the past to enable a cost-effective, increasingly freely available, comprehensive, repetitive, standardized, and objective monitoring of geomorphological characteristics and their traits. This contribution provides a state-of-the-art review for the RS-based monitoring of these characteristics and traits, by presenting examples of aeolian, fluvial, and coastal landforms. Different examples for monitoring geomorphology as a crucial discipline of geodiversity using RS are provided, discussing the implementation of RS technologies such as LiDAR, RADAR, as well as multi-spectral and hyperspectral sensor technologies. Furthermore, data products and RS technologies that could be used in the future for monitoring geomorphology are introduced. The use of spectral traits (ST) and spectral trait variation (STV) approaches with RS enable the status, changes, and disturbances of geomorphic diversity to be monitored. We focus on the requirements for future geomorphology monitoring specifically aimed at overcoming some key limitations of ecological modeling, namely: the implementation and linking of in-situ, close-range, air- and spaceborne RS technologies, geomorphic traits, and data science approaches as crucial components for a better understanding of the geomorphic impacts on complex ecosystems. This paper aims to impart multidimensional geomorphic information obtained by RS for improved utilization in biodiversity monitoring.
Collapse
|
13
|
Predicting Tree Species Diversity Using Geodiversity and Sentinel-2 Multi-Seasonal Spectral Information. SUSTAINABILITY 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/su12219250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Measuring and monitoring tree diversity is a prerequisite for altering biodiversity loss and the sustainable management of forest ecosystems. High temporal satellite remote sensing, recording difference in species phenology, can facilitate the extraction of timely, standardized and reliable information on tree diversity, complementing or replacing traditional field measurements. In this study, we used multispectral and multi-seasonal remotely sensed data from the Sentinel-2 satellite sensor along with geodiversity data for estimating local tree diversity in a Mediterranean forest area. One hundred plots were selected for in situ inventory of tree species and measurement of tree diversity using the Simpson’s (D1) and Shannon (H′) diversity indices. Four Sentinel-2 scenes and geodiversity variables, including elevation, aspect, moisture, and basement rock type, were exploited through a random forest regression algorithm for predicting the two diversity indices. The multi-seasonal models presented the highest accuracy for both indices with an R2 up to 0.37. In regard to the single season, spectral-only models, mid-summer and mid-autumn model also demonstrated satisfactory accuracy (max R2 = 0.28). On the other hand, the accuracy of the spectral-only early-spring and early-autumn models was significant lower (max R2 = 0.16), although it was improved with the use of geodiversity information (max R2 = 0.25).
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhou T, Geng Y, Chen J, Pan J, Haase D, Lausch A. High-resolution digital mapping of soil organic carbon and soil total nitrogen using DEM derivatives, Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data based on machine learning algorithms. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2020; 729:138244. [PMID: 32498148 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2020] [Revised: 03/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil total nitrogen (STN) are important indicators of soil health and play a key role in the global carbon and nitrogen cycles. High-resolution radar Sentinel-1 and multispectral Sentinel-2 images have the potential to investigate soil spatial distribution information over a large area, although Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data have rarely been combined to map either SOC or STN content. In this study, we applied machine learning techniques to map both SOC and STN content in the southern part of Central Europe using digital elevation model (DEM) derivatives, multi-temporal Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data, and evaluated the potential of different remote sensing sensors (Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2) to predict SOC and STN content. Four machine-learners including random forest (RF), boosted regression trees (BRT), support vector machine (SVM) and Bagged CART were used to construct predictive models of SOC and STN contents based on 179 soil samples and different combinations of environmental covariates. The performance of these models was evaluated based on a 10-fold cross-validation method by three statistical indicators. Overall, the BRT model performed better than RF, SVM and Bagged CART, and these models yielded similar spatial distribution patterns of SOC and STN. Our results showed that multi-source sensor methods provided more accurate predictions of SOC and STN contents than individual sensors. The application of radar Sentinel-1 and multispectral Sentinel-2 images proved useful for predicting SOC and STN. A combination of Sentinel-1/2-derived predictors and DEM derivatives yielded the highest prediction accuracy. The prediction accuracy changed with and without the Sentinel-1/2-derived predictors, with the R2 for estimating both SOC and STN content using the BRT model increasing by 12.8% and 18.8%, respectively. Topographic variables were the main explanatory variables for SOC and STN predictions, where elevation was assigned as the variable with the most importance by the models. The results of this study illustrate the potential of free high-resolution radar Sentinel-1 and multispectral Sentinel-2 data as input when developing SOC and STN prediction models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Zhou
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Geography, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany; Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Yajun Geng
- Nanjing Agricultural University, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Weigang 1, 210095 Nanjing, China
| | - Jie Chen
- Nanjing Agricultural University, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Weigang 1, 210095 Nanjing, China
| | - Jianjun Pan
- Nanjing Agricultural University, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Weigang 1, 210095 Nanjing, China
| | - Dagmar Haase
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Geography, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany; Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Angela Lausch
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Geography, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany; Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Advancing Learning Assignments in Remote Sensing of the Environment Through Simulation Games. REMOTE SENSING 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/rs12040735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Environmental remote sensing has faced increasing satellite data availability, advanced algorithms for thematic analysis, and novel concepts of ground truth. For that reason, contents and concepts of learning and teaching remote sensing are constantly evolving. This eventually leads to the intuition of methodologically linking academic learning assignments with case-related scopes of application. In order to render case-related learning possible, smart teaching and interactive learning contexts are appreciated and required for remote sensing. That is due to the fact that those contexts are considered promising to trigger and gradually foster students’ comprehensive interdisciplinary thinking. To this end, the following contribution introduces the case-related concept of applying simulation games as a promising didactic format in teaching/learning assignments of remote sensing. As to methodology, participating students have been invited to take on individual roles bound to technology-related profiles (e.g., satellite-mission planning, irrigation, etc.) Based on the scenario, stakeholder teams have been requested to elaborate, analyze and negotiate viable solutions for soil moisture monitoring in a defined context. Collaboration has been encouraged by providing the protected, specifically designed remoSSoil-incubator environment. This letter-type paper aims to introduce the simulation game technique in the context of remote sensing as a type of scholarly teaching; it evaluates learning outcomes by adopting certain techniques of scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL); and it provides food for thought of replicating, adapting and enhancing simulation games as an innovative, disruptive next-generation learning environment in remote sensing.
Collapse
|
16
|
von Hebel C, van der Kruk J, Huisman JA, Mester A, Altdorff D, Endres AL, Zimmermann E, Garré S, Vereecken H. Calibration, Conversion, and Quantitative Multi-Layer Inversion of Multi-Coil Rigid-Boom Electromagnetic Induction Data. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2019; 19:E4753. [PMID: 31683890 PMCID: PMC6864633 DOI: 10.3390/s19214753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Revised: 10/30/2019] [Accepted: 10/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Multi-coil electromagnetic induction (EMI) systems induce magnetic fields below and above the subsurface. The resulting magnetic field is measured at multiple coils increasingly separated from the transmitter in a rigid boom. This field relates to the subsurface apparent electrical conductivity (σa), and σa represents an average value for the depth range investigated with a specific coil separation and orientation. Multi-coil EMI data can be inverted to obtain layered bulk electrical conductivity models. However, above-ground stationary influences alter the signal and the inversion results can be unreliable. This study proposes an improved data processing chain, including EMI data calibration, conversion, and inversion. For the calibration of σa, three direct current resistivity techniques are compared: Electrical resistivity tomography with Dipole-Dipole and Schlumberger electrode arrays and vertical electrical soundings. All three methods obtained robust calibration results. The Dipole-Dipole-based calibration proved stable upon testing on different soil types. To further improve accuracy, we propose a non-linear exact EMI conversion to convert the magnetic field to σa. The complete processing workflow provides accurate and quantitative EMI data and the inversions reliable estimates of the intrinsic electrical conductivities. This improves the ability to combine EMI with, e.g., remote sensing, and the use of EMI for monitoring purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian von Hebel
- Institute of Bio- and Geoscience, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
- Centre for High-Performance Scientific Computing in Terrestrial Systems (TerrSys), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
| | - Jan van der Kruk
- Institute of Bio- and Geoscience, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
- Centre for High-Performance Scientific Computing in Terrestrial Systems (TerrSys), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
| | - Johan A Huisman
- Institute of Bio- and Geoscience, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
- Centre for High-Performance Scientific Computing in Terrestrial Systems (TerrSys), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
| | - Achim Mester
- Central Institute for Engineering, Elektronics and Analytics, Electronic Systems (ZEA-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
| | - Daniel Altdorff
- Institute of Bio- and Geoscience, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
- Boreal Ecosystem Research Initiative, Memorial University, Corner Brook A2H 5G4, NL, Canada.
| | - Anthony L Endres
- Earth and Environmental Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo N2L 3G1, ON, Canada.
| | - Egon Zimmermann
- Central Institute for Engineering, Elektronics and Analytics, Electronic Systems (ZEA-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
| | - Sarah Garré
- Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Liège University, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium.
| | - Harry Vereecken
- Institute of Bio- and Geoscience, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
- Centre for High-Performance Scientific Computing in Terrestrial Systems (TerrSys), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|