Public Health Implications and Possible Sources of Lead (Pb) as a Contaminant of Poorly Regulated Kratom Products in the United States

Elemental impurities (heavy metals) in kratom products: an assessment of published individual product analyses

INTRODUCTION

Kratom is commonly used by consumers, and the elemental impurity exposure that consumers would have at different kratom ingestion doses has been determined.

METHODS

This assessment used original data from independent third-party laboratory testing of kratom products to identify the percentage of products that exceeded permissible daily exposure limits for lead (5 µg/day), nickel (200 µg/day), arsenic (15 µg/day), and cadmium (5 µg/day), the interim reference level for lead in adults (12.5 µg/day), and the tolerable upper intake level for manganese (11 mg/day) and nickel (1 mg/day). We assessed all products regardless of type and then evaluated non-extract products, extract products, and a soda preparation separately for elemental impurities.

RESULTS

Three assessments of elemental impurities in kratom products have been published, totaling 68 products. Assessing all products and assuming a 3 g daily dose of kratom, 7.4% would exceed the permissible daily exposure limits for lead, 0% for nickel, 3.1% for arsenic, and 0% for cadmium. At a kratom dose of 25 g daily, 70.6% would exceed the permissible daily exposure limits for lead, 20.6% for nickel, 9.4% for arsenic, and 0% for cadmium. The interim reference level for lead would be exceeded by 1.5% of products at a kratom daily dose of 3 g and 33.8% of products at 25 g. The tolerable upper intake level for manganese would be exceeded by 12.5% of products at a kratom daily dose of 3 g and 41.7% of products at 25 g. Non-extract products generally contain greater concentrations of elemental impurities than extract products or the soda preparation.

DISCUSSION

Apart from their concentrations in a gram of product, assessing the amount of exposure to elemental impurities at different kratom ingestion doses is also important. Elemental impurities exceeding regulatory permissible concentrations for many products, especially with greater daily kratom ingestion doses, may impact human health.

CONCLUSIONS

Some kratom products contain excessive concentrations of elemental impurities of toxicological concern, such as lead and arsenic. Non-extract products (powders, capsules, tablets) generally contain greater concentrations of elemental impurities than extract products or the soda preparation. Daily use of these products can result in exposures exceeding regulatory thresholds and adverse health effects.

Associations Between Opioid and Kratom Use in the USA: Differences by Race/Ethnicity and Sexual Orientation

BACKGROUND

Kratom is federally unregulated and is marketed as an opioid alternative despite limited evidence and known negative effects. Disparities in associations between opioid and kratom use may be partly attributed to race/ethnicity and sexual orientation given differences in marketing, use motives, and prescriber practices.

METHODS

Data: 2021 nationally representative National Survey on Drug Use and Health among individuals aged 18 + . We used weighted logistic regression analyses to assess race/ethnicity and sexual orientation as moderators of associations between past-year opioid (1) use (total sample, n = 44,877) and (2) misuse and use disorder (among those with past-year opioid use, n = 10,398) and the outcome of kratom use (lifetime, past year).

RESULTS

26.76% reported past-year opioid use, and among those, 12.20% and 7.54% reported past-year opioid misuse and use disorder, respectively; 1.72% and 0.67% had lifetime and past-year kratom use, respectively. Opioid use was positively associated with lifetime (aOR = 2.69, 95%CI = 1.98, 3.66) and past-year (aOR = 3.84, 95%CI = 2.50, 5.92) kratom use; associations among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic (vs. non-Hispanic White) participants were weaker (p < 0.01). Among participants reporting past-year opioid use, misuse and use disorder were positively associated with lifetime (aORmisuse = 2.46, 95%CI = 1.60, 3.78; aORuse disorder = 5.58, 95%CI = 2.82, 11.04) and past-year (aORmisuse = 2.40, 95%CI = 1.26, 4.59; aORuse disorder = 3.08, 95%CI = 1.48, 6.41) kratom use; among bisexual (vs. heterosexual) participants, opioid use disorder was associated with a lower probability of lifetime kratom use (p < 0.01).

DISCUSSION

We observed positive associations between opioid and kratom use, with potential disparities among certain racial/ethnic and sexual orientation groups. Research should examine the mechanisms contributing to these differences to inform prevention and intervention efforts.

Research and publication gaps on kratom and kratom products: a scoping review of current literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Kratom plant, products derived from the plant, and plant phytochemicals are of great interest among researchers, clinicians, and consumers. However, there is a paucity of rigorously collected scientific data on their risk/safety profile and public health impact. This scoping review discusses original research articles published between 2022 and 2023. It focuses on identifying publication gaps on topics related to epidemiology, public health, and risk/safety profiles comparing evidence collected by researchers from Southeast Asia and the West.

RECENT FINDINGS

Our review of the Scopus database identified a total of 55 publications, including clinical case reports and case series reports, surveys, studies enrolling human participants, and publications based on large-scale national surveys or large-scale national or international health system database records.

SUMMARY

Overall, there is dearth of reliable data on key epidemiological factors, including the prevalence rates, and on objective and reliable indices of the risk/safety profiles. Rigorous and systematic studies including improved epidemiological surveillance, human laboratory, and controlled clinical studies are urgently needed to advance our understanding of public health consequences of consuming kratom and kratom-derived products and to improve our understanding of their risk/safety profile and additional analytical studies to better inform development of needed regulatory oversight.

Kratom Retail Availability in Fort Worth, Texas

Kratom use is associated with cannabis use, so retail availability may also be related. Kratom and Delta-8 THC (a psychoactive cannabis product) are federally unregulated, marketed as "natural," and often used for pain relief and/or relaxation. Kratom may have greater retail availability in more socioeconomically deprived areas because harmful substances are frequently marketed to lower-income communities. This study examined kratom retail availability in Fort Worth, Texas. Locations with alcohol, tobacco, and/or CBD licenses were called in July 2022: 1,025/1,223 (84%) answered the phone. T-tests examined potential differences in socioeconomic deprivation scores surrounding outlets by whether they sold kratom. Cross-tabulations examined overlap in kratom and Delta-8 THC availability. Kratom was available in 6% of locations. Most kratom retailers had a tobacco license (92%). However, most stores with a tobacco license did not sell kratom (14%), whereas most stores with a CBD license did (55%). Kratom availability was not associated with area deprivation scores. Most kratom retailers (95%) sold Delta-8 THC and two-thirds (65%) of Delta-8 THC retailers sold kratom. This study was the first to examine retail availability of kratom. Findings indicate the presence of niche stores specializing in the retail of federally unregulated substances.

Clinical Implications of Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) Use: a Literature Review

Purpose of Review

This work aims to provide an up-to-date review of the preclinical and clinical scientific literature on the therapeutic value of kratom to better understand the underlying mechanisms related to its use and inform future therapeutic applications.

Recent Findings

A growing number of studies, mainly of cross-sectional nature, describe the widespread use of kratom by individuals to self-treat pain, psychiatric symptoms, and substance use disorders (SUD) outside a controlled clinical setting. Preclinical evidence suggests kratom is effective as an analgesic agent and might decrease the self-administration of other drugs. A randomized controlled trial has further supported kratom's therapeutic value as an analgesic. Investigations in nonclinical samples of long-term kratom users also indicate its therapeutic benefit in managing SUD symptoms (e.g., craving) and long-term or acute symptoms (e.g., withdrawal) for alcohol, opioids, and other illicit drugs. However, episodes of kratom-related intoxications have also been reported, often due to the adulteration and the contamination of kratom products mainly sold online or mixed toxicities when consumed outside clinical and traditional settings.

Summary

Evidence on the clinical implications of kratom use is still limited and uncertain, with kratom research constantly evolving. Therefore, further randomized trials are needed.