1
|
Abu Rass R, Kembou-Ringert JE, Zamostiano R, Eldar A, Ehrlich M, Bacharach E. Mapping of Tilapia Lake Virus entry pathways with inhibitors reveals dependence on dynamin activity and cholesterol but not endosomal acidification. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022; 10:1075364. [PMID: 36605723 PMCID: PMC9809973 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1075364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Tilapia Lake Virus (TiLV) is an emerging virus lethal to tilapia, which threatens the global tilapia aquaculture with severe implications for food security. TiLV possesses similar features to orthomyxoviruses but is classified in the sole and the monotypic genus Tilapinevirus of the family Amnoonviridae. TiLV enveloped virions encapsidate a genome comprising ten segments of single-stranded, negative RNA. Remarkably, nine of TiLV's ten major proteins lack sequence homology to any known viral or cellular proteins. The mode of TiLV entry into tilapia cells is not known. Following the measurement of the entry window of TiLV (∼3 h), we applied a panel of inhibitors of known regulators of endocytic functions to map the molecular requirements for TiLV entry. We identified productive entry by quantification of TiLV nucleoprotein expression and the generation of infectious particles. Inhibition of dynamin activity with dynasore or dynole, or depletion of cholesterol with methyl-β-cyclodextrin, strongly inhibited TiLV protein synthesis and infectious virion production. Moreover, inhibition of actin cytoskeleton polymerization with latrunculin A or microtubule polymerization with nocodazole within the entry window resulted in partial inhibition of TiLV infection. In contrast, inhibitors of endosomal acidification (NH4Cl, bafilomycin A1, or chloroquine), an inhibitor of clathrin-coated pit assembly (pitstop 2), and erlotinib-an inhibitor of the endocytic Cyclin G-associated kinase (GAK), did not affect TiLV entry. Altogether, these results suggest that TiLV enters via dynamin-mediated endocytosis in a cholesterol-, cytoskeleton-dependent manner, and clathrin-, pH-independent manner. Thus, despite being an orthomyxo-like virus, when compared to the prototypical orthomyxovirus (influenza A virus), TiLV shows a distinct set of requirements for entry into cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reem Abu Rass
- The Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer Research, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | - Japhette Esther Kembou-Ringert
- The Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer Research, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | - Rachel Zamostiano
- The Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer Research, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | - Avi Eldar
- Department of Virology, The Kimron Veterinary Institute, Beit Dagan, Israel
| | - Marcelo Ehrlich
- The Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer Research, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel,*Correspondence: Marcelo Ehrlich, ; Eran Bacharach,
| | - Eran Bacharach
- The Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer Research, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel,*Correspondence: Marcelo Ehrlich, ; Eran Bacharach,
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhong M, Wang H, Yan H, Wu S, Wang K, Yang L, Cui B, Wu M, Li Y. Effects and mechanism of Aβ 1-42 on EV-A71 replication. Virol J 2022; 19:151. [PMID: 36127711 PMCID: PMC9485788 DOI: 10.1186/s12985-022-01882-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background β-Amyloid (Aβ) protein is a pivotal pathogenetic factor in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, increasing evidence suggests that the brain has to continuously produce excessive Aβ to efficaciously prevent pathogenic micro-organism infections, which induces and accelerates the disease process of AD. Meanwhile, Aβ exhibits activity against herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and influenza A virus (IAV) replication, but not against other neurotropic viruses. Enterovirus A71 (EV-A71) is the most important neurotropic enterovirus in the post-polio era. Given the limitation of existing research on the relationship between Aβ and other virus infections, this study aimed to investigate the potent activity of Aβ on EV-A71 infection and extended the potential function of Aβ in other unenveloped viruses may be linked to Alzheimer's disease or infectious neurological diseases. Methods Aβ peptides 1–42 are a major pathological factor of senile plaques in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Thus, we utilized Aβ1–42 as a test subject to perform our study. The production of monomer Aβ1–42 and their high-molecular oligomer accumulations in neural cells were detected by immunofluorescence assay, ELISA, or Western blot assay. The inhibitory activity of Aβ1–42 peptides against EV-A71 in vitro was detected by Western blot analysis or qRT-PCR. The mechanism of Aβ1–42 against EV-A71 replication was analyzed by time-of-addition assay, attachment inhibition assay, pre-attachment inhibition analysis, viral-penetration inhibition assay, TEM analysis of virus agglutination, and pull-down assay. Results We found that EV-A71 infection induced Aβ production and accumulation in SH-SY5Y cells. We also revealed for the first time that Aβ1–42 efficiently inhibited the RNA level of EV-A71 VP1, and the protein levels of VP1, VP2, and nonstructural protein 3AB in SH-SY5Y, Vero, and human rhabdomyosarcoma (RD) cells. Mechanistically, we demonstrated that Aβ1–42 primarily targeted the early stage of EV-A71 entry to inhibit virus replication by binding virus capsid protein VP1 or scavenger receptor class B member 2. Moreover, Aβ1–42 formed non-enveloped EV-A71 particle aggregates within a certain period and bound to the capsid protein VP1, which partially caused Aβ1–42 to prevent viruses from infecting cells. Conclusions Our findings unveiled that Aβ1–42 effectively inhibited nonenveloped EV-A71 by targeting the early phase of an EV-A71 life cycle, thereby extending the potential function of Aβ in other non-envelope viruses linked to infectious neurological diseases. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12985-022-01882-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Zhong
- CAMS Key Laboratory of Antiviral Drug Research, Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 1 Tiantan xili, Beijing, 100050, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Antimicrobial Agents, Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Huiqiang Wang
- CAMS Key Laboratory of Antiviral Drug Research, Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 1 Tiantan xili, Beijing, 100050, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Antimicrobial Agents, Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Haiyan Yan
- CAMS Key Laboratory of Antiviral Drug Research, Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 1 Tiantan xili, Beijing, 100050, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Antimicrobial Agents, Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Shuo Wu
- CAMS Key Laboratory of Antiviral Drug Research, Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 1 Tiantan xili, Beijing, 100050, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Antimicrobial Agents, Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Kun Wang
- CAMS Key Laboratory of Antiviral Drug Research, Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 1 Tiantan xili, Beijing, 100050, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Antimicrobial Agents, Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Lu Yang
- CAMS Key Laboratory of Antiviral Drug Research, Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 1 Tiantan xili, Beijing, 100050, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Antimicrobial Agents, Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Boming Cui
- CAMS Key Laboratory of Antiviral Drug Research, Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 1 Tiantan xili, Beijing, 100050, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Antimicrobial Agents, Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Mengyuan Wu
- CAMS Key Laboratory of Antiviral Drug Research, Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 1 Tiantan xili, Beijing, 100050, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Antimicrobial Agents, Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Yuhuan Li
- CAMS Key Laboratory of Antiviral Drug Research, Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 1 Tiantan xili, Beijing, 100050, China. .,Beijing Key Laboratory of Antimicrobial Agents, Institute of Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100050, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chengula AA, Mugimba KK, Tal S, Levi RT, Dubey S, Mutoloki S, Dishon A, David L, Evensen Ø, Munang'andu HM. Efficiency, sensitivity and specificity of a quantitative real-time PCR assay for Tilapia Lake virus (TiLV). J Virol Methods 2022; 307:114567. [PMID: 35709972 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2022.114567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Tilapia lake virus (TiLV) is an emerging viral pathogen of tilapiines worldwide in wild and farmed tilapia. TiLV is an orthomyxo-like, negative sense segmented RNA virus, belonging to genus Tilapinevirus, family Amnoonviridae. Here we developed a quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) assay testing primer sets targeting the 10 segments of TiLV. Sensitivity, specificity, efficiency and reproducibility of these assays were examined. Detection sensitivity was equivalent to 2 TCID50/ml when tested on supernatants from cell culture-grown TiLV. Specificity tests showed that all primer sets amplified their respective TiLV segments, and standard curves showed linear correlation of R2 > 0.998 and amplification efficiencies between 93 % and 98 %. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CV %) were in the range of 0.0 %- 2.6 % and 0.0 %- 5.9 %, respectively. Sensitivity tests showed that primer sets targeting segments 1, 2, 3 and 4 had the highest detection sensitivities (100.301 TCID50/ml). The qRT-PCR used for detection of viral genome in TiLV infected organs gave virus titers equivalent to 3.80 log10, 3.94 log10 and 3.52 log10 TCID50/ml for brain, kidney and liver tissues, respectively as calculated on the basis of Ct values. These findings suggest that primer optimization for qPCR should not only focus on attaining high amplification efficiency but also sensitivity comparison of primer sets targeting different viral segments in order to develop a method with the highest sensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Augustino Alfred Chengula
- Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Paraclinical Sciences, PO Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway; Sokoine University of Agriculture, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Department of Microbiology, Parasitology and Biotechnology, P.O. Box 3019, Morogoro, Tanzania
| | - Kizito Kahoza Mugimba
- Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Paraclinical Sciences, PO Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway; Makerere University, College of Veterinary Medicine Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Department of Biotechnical and Diagnostic Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Shlomit Tal
- Phibro Animal Health Corporation, R&D Vaccines, Ha'melacha St. 3, POB 489, West Industrial Zone, Beit-Shemesh 99100, Israel
| | - Roni Tadmor Levi
- Department of Animal Sciences, R.H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, P.O. Box 12, Rehovot 7610001, Israel
| | - Saurabh Dubey
- Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Paraclinical Sciences, PO Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway
| | - Stephen Mutoloki
- Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Paraclinical Sciences, PO Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway
| | - Arnon Dishon
- Phibro Animal Health Corporation, R&D Vaccines, Ha'melacha St. 3, POB 489, West Industrial Zone, Beit-Shemesh 99100, Israel
| | - Lior David
- Department of Animal Sciences, R.H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, P.O. Box 12, Rehovot 7610001, Israel
| | - Øystein Evensen
- Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Paraclinical Sciences, PO Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway
| | - Hetron Mweemba Munang'andu
- Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Paraclinical Sciences, PO Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway; Department of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord University, PB 1490, 8049 Bodø, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aich N, Paul A, Choudhury TG, Saha H. Tilapia Lake Virus (TiLV) disease: Current status of understanding. AQUACULTURE AND FISHERIES 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.aaf.2021.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
5
|
Tattiyapong P, Dechavichitlead W, Waltzek TB, Surachetpong W. Tilapia develop protective immunity including a humoral response following exposure to tilapia lake virus. FISH & SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGY 2020; 106:666-674. [PMID: 32858185 DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2020.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 08/02/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Tilapia lake virus (TiLV) is an emerging virus associated with high mortality in cultured tilapia. Since the first report of tilapia lake virus, it has been detected in diseased tilapia in sixteen countries around the world. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop an efficacious vaccine to prevent TiLV disease (TiLVD) and reduce its global economic impact. Understanding the role of the adaptive immune response following exposure of tilapia to TiLV is a critical step in the development of such a vaccine. In this study, we challenged red hybrid tilapia by cohabitation or intraperitoneal injection and demonstrated that surviving fish develop a protective immunity. We also demonstrated that tilapia that survived experimental infections possess significant antibodies against the protein encoded by the TiLV segment 4. We then developed a TiLV indirect ELISA to determine the antibody response in tilapia. The ELISA revealed high antibody levels in survivors of experimental challenges and following outbreaks on farms. The ELISA effectively distinguished TiLV-exposed from unexposed tilapia and was used to monitor anti-TiLV antibody kinetics following infection. During the primary infection, tilapia developed an antibody response as early as 7 days post TiLV challenge (dpc), peaked at 15 dpc, showed a gradual decline up until about 42 dpc, but persisted in some fish up until day 110 dpc. Upon re-infection, an increased antibody response occurred within 7-14 days, demonstrating that tilapia that survive TiLV infections develop humoral memory. In conclusion, our results demonstrated that tilapia mount antibody responses against TiLV that supports protective immunity to subsequent TiLV disease. The persistence of anti-TiLV antibodies in survivors following a single exposure suggests a single vaccination might be adequate to protect tilapia during the entire grow-out period. This study provides important information about the immune response of tilapia following exposure to TiLV as a first step in the development of an efficacious vaccine against this emerging and economically important viral disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puntanat Tattiyapong
- Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University. Thailand; Center for Advanced Studies for Agriculture and Food, Kasetsart University, Institute for Advanced Studies, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand (CASAF, NRU-KU), Thailand
| | - Worawan Dechavichitlead
- Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University. Thailand; Center for Advanced Studies for Agriculture and Food, Kasetsart University, Institute for Advanced Studies, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand (CASAF, NRU-KU), Thailand
| | - Thomas B Waltzek
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Win Surachetpong
- Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University. Thailand; Center for Advanced Studies for Agriculture and Food, Kasetsart University, Institute for Advanced Studies, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand (CASAF, NRU-KU), Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Surachetpong W, Roy SRK, Nicholson P. Tilapia lake virus: The story so far. JOURNAL OF FISH DISEASES 2020; 43:1115-1132. [PMID: 32829488 DOI: 10.1111/jfd.13237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Tilapia lake virus (TiLV) is a highly contagious pathogen that has detrimental effects on tilapia farming. This virus was discovered in 2014 and has received tremendous global attention from the aquaculture sector due to its association with high fish mortalities and its strong economic impact on the tilapia aquaculture industry. Currently, TiLV has been reported in 16 countries, and this number is continuing to rise due to improved diagnostic assays and surveillance activities around the world. In this review, we summarize the up-to-date knowledge of TiLV with regard to TiLV host species, the clinical signs of a TiLV infection, the affected tissues, pathogenesis and potential disease risk factors. We also describe the reported information concerning the virus itself: its morphology, genetic make-up and transmission pathways. We review the current methods for virus detection and potential control measures. We close the review of the TiLV story so far, by offering a commentary on the major TiLV research gaps, why these are delaying future TiLV research and why the TiLV field needs to come together and proceed as a more collaborative scientific community if there is any hope limiting the impact of this serious virus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Win Surachetpong
- Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Sri Rajiv Kumar Roy
- Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pamela Nicholson
- Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Institute of Genetics, Vetsuisse, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Pathobiology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|