1
|
Sojati J, Murali A, Rapsinski G, Williams JV. Do Not Throw Away Your Shot: Pilot Study in Improving Medical School Curricula Through Focused Vaccine Education. AJPM FOCUS 2024; 3:100178. [PMID: 38312525 PMCID: PMC10835123 DOI: 10.1016/j.focus.2023.100178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
Introduction With widely prevalent vaccine hesitancy and medical mistrust, future healthcare providers require knowledge of vaccines and comfort in discussing vaccines with patients. However, many U.S. medical schools do not offer formal or elective curricula focused on vaccine education. Methods We sought to identify the need for such a curriculum and student gaps in knowledge through a pilot study surveying first- and second-year medical students at a large Pennsylvania medical school to assess knowledge about vaccine initiatives/policies, comfort in discussing vaccines, attitudes toward curricular changes, and effects of COVID-19 on willingness for vaccine education. Results Many participants (>40%) reported insufficient knowledge of vaccine policy, vaccine development and testing, and community vaccine initiatives. The majority (>50%) indicated discomfort in discussing vaccines in a clinical setting. Importantly, 79% of participants reported insufficient coverage of vaccine topics in the current curriculum. A total of 54% decisively wanted formal/mandatory education versus 72% who decisively wanted elective education. Desiring formal education was associated with less comfort in discussing vaccines overall and with vaccine-hesitant people in clinical settings. Reassuringly, 74% of participants noted that the COVID-19 pandemic made them want to learn more about vaccines. Guided by these findings, we conducted a pilot elective teaching about vaccines through case studies, interactive discussions, and role-playing scenarios. Pre- and postcourse surveys showed improvement in student knowledge in all vaccine-related topics assessed. Conclusions These data can inform the development of formal and elective curricula that effectively prepare medical students for patients' vaccine questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorna Sojati
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Anjana Murali
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Glenn Rapsinski
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - John V. Williams
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Microbiology & Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Institute for Infection, Immunity, and Inflammation in Children, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kongo E, Shpati K, Dama A, Ymeraj S, Murati E, Veliaj U, Xinxo S. Determinant Factors of Voluntary or Mandatory Vaccination against COVID-19: A Survey Study among Students at Albanian University. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1215. [PMID: 37515031 PMCID: PMC10385280 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11071215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The world faced serious health and socioeconomic issues with the advent of COVID-19. Along with handwashing, social distancing, and the wearing of masks, vaccination was considered by medical authorities as a key way to curb the spread of the virus. One of the measures that have been proposed to increase vaccinations is the mandatory policy. The purpose of this study was to compare the determinants of voluntary and mandatory vaccination among students at Albanian University. METHODOLOGY This cross-sectional study, conducted by means of an online survey, was conducted among students enrolled at the private Albanian University, Tirana, Albania during the last week of the winter semester, 7-14 February 2022. RESULTS In sum, 878 students participated in this study, among whom 612 (69.7%) were females and 266 (30%) were males. Of the participants, 506 (57%) were enrolled in medical science (MS) and 372 (42.3%) were in the non-medical science (Non-MS) group. A total of 773 (88%) were vaccinated against COVID-19, and 105 (11.8%) were not vaccinated. A total of 466 (53%) reported voluntary vaccination, and 412 (46.9%) reported mandatory vaccination. Among the students who were vaccinated voluntarily, 266 (57%) were from the MS group and 200 (42.9%) were from the Non-MS group. A total of 237 (57.5%) of students in the mandatory vaccination group were from the MS group, and 175 (42.4%) were from the Non-MS group. CONCLUSIONS Vaccine safety and efficacy were hindering factors in vaccination. Additionally, based on the results of this study, the students felt encouraged by the academic staff to vaccinate. This clearly demonstrates that the staff does not lack the skills to enhance students' knowledge about the risk of infectious diseases and the importance of vaccination. Therefore, to influence students' attitudes as much as possible toward vaccination, comprehensive educational programs, including modifications of existing curricula, should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elona Kongo
- Dentistry Department, Faculty of Medical Science, Albanian University, 1017 Tirana, Albania
| | - Kleva Shpati
- Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Medical Science, Albanian University, 1017 Tirana, Albania
| | - Aida Dama
- Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Medical Science, Albanian University, 1017 Tirana, Albania
| | - Sibela Ymeraj
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Science, Albanian University, 1017 Tirana, Albania
| | - Ema Murati
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Science, Albanian University, 1017 Tirana, Albania
| | - Uels Veliaj
- IT Department, Albanian University, 1017 Tirana, Albania
| | - Sonela Xinxo
- Dentistry Department, Faculty of Medical Science, Albanian University, 1017 Tirana, Albania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
BECHINI ANGELA, VANNACCI ALFREDO, SALVATI CRISTINA, CRESCIOLI GIADA, LOMBARDI NICCOLÒ, CHIESI FABRIZIO, SHTYLLA JONIDA, DEL RICCIO MARCO, BONANNI PAOLO, BOCCALINI SARA. Knowledge and training of Italian students in Healthcare Settings on COVID-19 vaccines and vaccination strategies, one year after the immunization campaign. JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE AND HYGIENE 2023; 64:E152-E160. [PMID: 37654864 PMCID: PMC10468188 DOI: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2023.64.2.2934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
Introduction COVID-19 vaccines represent an important opportunity for defeating the disease, as long as high vaccination acceptance rates are achieved. Healthcare workers (HCWs) have a relevant role in the promotion of immunization among the population and since students in healthcare area will be HCWs it is crucial to provide more in-depth knowledge on vaccinations. Therefore, the aim of the study is to assess the knowledge of medical and pharmaceutical area students regarding COVID-19 vaccination and the impact of a specific Elective Teaching Activity (ETA) on the increase of students' knowledge. The ETA was held one year after the immunization campaign in Italy. Methods Students' knowledge was tested with a questionnaire before and after attending the course. Descriptive statistical methods were used to analyse the results obtained. Student's t-tests for paired data were used. Results Overall, 387 students at the University of Florence attended the course and took the same test before and after the ETA on COVID-19 vaccines. Despite achieving satisfactory average scores in the pre-course test (26/32 ± 4.0), all students were able to significantly enhance their final score (+17.1%; p < 0.001), indicating that the ETA was highly effective in improving their knowledge of COVID-19 vaccination. Medical students demonstrated a better comprehension of the role of the medical specialist in public health in the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, while some uncertainties were revealed regarding the role of pharmacists. Conclusions The results of this study confirm that specific training activities on vaccination are effective for implementing the knowledge of future health professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- ANGELA BECHINI
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - ALFREDO VANNACCI
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - CRISTINA SALVATI
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - GIADA CRESCIOLI
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - NICCOLÒ LOMBARDI
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | - JONIDA SHTYLLA
- SIAF - Digital Learning and IT Training Process Unit, Area for the Innovation and Management of Information and Computer Systems, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - MARCO DEL RICCIO
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - PAOLO BONANNI
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - SARA BOCCALINI
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gavaruzzi T, Caserotti M, Bonaiuti R, Bonanni P, Crescioli G, Di Tommaso M, Lombardi N, Lotto L, Ravaldi C, Rubaltelli E, Tasso A, Vannacci A, Girardi P. The Interplay of Perceived Risks and Benefits in Deciding to Become Vaccinated against COVID-19 While Pregnant or Breastfeeding: A Cross-Sectional Study in Italy. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12103469. [PMID: 37240575 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The present study examined the role of the perception of risks and benefits for the mother and her babies in deciding about the COVID-19 vaccination. In this cross-sectional study, five hypotheses were tested using data from a convenience sample of Italian pregnant and/or breastfeeding women (N = 1104, July-September 2021). A logistic regression model estimated the influence of the predictors on the reported behavior, and a beta regression model was used to evaluate which factors influenced the willingness to become vaccinated among unvaccinated women. The COVID-19 vaccination overall risks/benefits tradeoff was highly predictive of both behavior and intention. Ceteris paribus, an increase in the perception of risks for the baby weighed more against vaccination than a similar increase in the perception of risks for the mother. Additionally, pregnant women resulted in being less likely (or willing) to be vaccinated in their status than breastfeeding women, but they were equally accepting of vaccination if they were not pregnant. COVID-19 risk perception predicted intention to become vaccinated, but not behavior. In conclusion, the overall risks/benefits tradeoff is key in predicting vaccination behavior and intention, but the concerns for the baby weigh more than those for the mother in the decision, shedding light on this previously neglected aspect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Gavaruzzi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
| | - Marta Caserotti
- Department of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
| | - Roberto Bonaiuti
- PeaRL Perinatal Research Laboratory, CiaoLapo Foundation for Perinatal Health, Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Firenze, 50139 Firenze, Italy
| | - Paolo Bonanni
- Department of Health Science, University of Firenze, 50121 Firenze, Italy
| | - Giada Crescioli
- PeaRL Perinatal Research Laboratory, CiaoLapo Foundation for Perinatal Health, Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Firenze, 50139 Firenze, Italy
| | | | - Niccolò Lombardi
- PeaRL Perinatal Research Laboratory, CiaoLapo Foundation for Perinatal Health, Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Firenze, 50139 Firenze, Italy
| | - Lorella Lotto
- Department of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
| | - Claudia Ravaldi
- PeaRL Perinatal Research Laboratory, CiaoLapo Foundation for Perinatal Health, Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Firenze, 50139 Firenze, Italy
| | - Enrico Rubaltelli
- Department of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
| | - Alessandra Tasso
- Department of Humanities, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Alfredo Vannacci
- PeaRL Perinatal Research Laboratory, CiaoLapo Foundation for Perinatal Health, Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Firenze, 50139 Firenze, Italy
| | - Paolo Girardi
- Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca' Foscari University of Venezia, 30123 Venezia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Odone A, Dallagiacoma G, Vigezzi GP. Vaccine Mandates in the COVID-19 Era: Changing Paradigm or Public Health Opportunity? Comment on "Convergence on Coercion: Functional and Political Pressures as Drivers of Global Childhood Vaccine Mandates". Int J Health Policy Manag 2022; 12:7616. [PMID: 37579446 PMCID: PMC10125141 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The debate around vaccine mandates has flourished over the last decade, with several countries introducing or extending mandatory childhood vaccinations. In a recent study, Attwell and Hannah explore how functional and political pressures added to public health threats in selected countries, motivating governments to increase the coerciveness of their childhood vaccine regimes. In this commentary, we reflect on whether such model applies to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) case and how the pandemic has re-shuffled the deck around vaccine mandates. We identify COVID-19 immunisation policies' distinctive aspects as we make the case of countries implementing mass immunisation programmes while relying on digital COVID-19 certificates as an indirect form of mandate to increase vaccine uptake. We conclude by acknowledging that different forms of mandatory vaccination might serve as a shortcut to protect population health in times of emergency, underlining, however, that the ultimate public health goal is to promote voluntary, informed, and responsible adherence to preventive behaviours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Odone
- Department of Public Health Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Giacomo Pietro Vigezzi
- Department of Public Health Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Collegio Ca’ della Paglia, Fondazione Ghislieri, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Attitudes and Perceptions of University Students in Healthcare Settings towards Vaccines and Vaccinations Strategies during the COVID-19 Pandemic Period in Italy. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10081288. [PMID: 36016176 PMCID: PMC9413643 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10081288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Healthcare students that refuse to get vaccinated may expose themselves and their patients to several vaccine-preventable diseases, especially during outbreaks or at peak epidemic activity, becoming a threat to themselves and their patients. This study aimed to assess their attitudes towards and perception of vaccines and vaccination. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was shared with medical students, pharmacy students and medical residents in Hygiene and Preventive Medicine at the University of Florence (Italy), in February 2021. The questionnaire contained 39 questions with open, multi-choice, yes–no, Likert scale answers. A Vaccine Hesitancy Index (VHI) was then calculated. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results: A total of 473 students participated in this study. All students were in favour of vaccination (99.2%) but a relatively low number of participants judged their level of knowledge about vaccinations as “good” (21.8%) or “excellent” (0.6%). About half of students declared that they are not adequately trained during their academic courses. The VHI showed low levels of vaccine hesitancy (mean ± SD 0.38 ± 0.16); moreover, the students were willing to get vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 when recommended (88.2%) and thought that these vaccines are generally safe. Few students considered the development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines (13.1%) and the procedures for evaluating clinical trials for marketing authorisation of these vaccines (12.9%) too fast to guarantee their efficacy and safety. Conclusions: Since vaccination and vaccine hesitancy and acceptance topics are being paid increasing attention by the population, new strategies to increase future healthcare professionals’ willingness to promote vaccination and get vaccinated, as well as knowledge on vaccines and vaccination, will be of the utmost importance to fight vaccine preventable diseases.
Collapse
|