1
|
Einarsdottir S, Al-Dury S, Fridriksson E, Andius LD, Wang H, Sharba S, Mountagui A, Waern J, Ringlander J, Martner A, Hellstrand K, Waldenström J, Lagging M. Immunogenicity of Comirnaty Omicron XBB.1.5 booster COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in long-term survivors after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Sci Rep 2024; 14:24749. [PMID: 39433814 PMCID: PMC11494131 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-74712-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 09/27/2024] [Indexed: 10/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Primary mRNA vaccination against COVID-19 typically involves three doses for immunocompromised individuals, including hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients. However, optimal subsequent boosting strategies remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the immunogenicity of a booster dose using the most recently updated vaccine (Comirnaty Omicron XBB.1.5) among long-term allo-HSCT survivors having previously received multiple mRNA vaccine doses, in median 4 (2-6). Thirty-four allo-HSCT recipients were enrolled at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, and peripheral blood samples were collected immediately before and four weeks after booster. Antibodies against the receptor-binding domain (anti-RBD) of spike 1 (S1) and nucleocapsid, as well as S1-specific ex vivo T-cell responses, were evaluated. Adverse events were monitored. Despite a median of 13 months since the prior vaccine dose, both humoral and T-cell responses against S1 were present in the pre-booster samples in all but two participants, who suffered from severe chronic Graft-versus-host disease. Notably, 62% of participants had a previously confirmed COVID-19 infection. Significantly higher pre-booster antibody levels were observed in women than men (p = 0.003). Booster dosing strengthened specific antibody and T cell responses and equalized pre-booster gender differences, although responses remained significantly lower among those receiving immunosuppressive treatment (p = 0.041). In a population of long-term allo-HSCT survivors, the majority of whom had a prior confirmed COVID-19 infection, both pre- and post-booster immune responses were robust. However, patients undergoing immunosuppressive treatment for GvHD exhibited significantly weaker responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sigrun Einarsdottir
- Department of Hematology, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Samer Al-Dury
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ellen Fridriksson
- Department of Hematology, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Linn Dahlsten Andius
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Hao Wang
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Sinan Sharba
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Amin Mountagui
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Johan Waern
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Johan Ringlander
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Region Västra Götaland, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anna Martner
- TIMM Laboratory, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Kristoffer Hellstrand
- Region Västra Götaland, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- TIMM Laboratory, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jesper Waldenström
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Martin Lagging
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Region Västra Götaland, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kavikondala S, Haeussler K, Wang X, Spellman A, Bausch-Jurken MT, Sharma P, Amiri M, Krivelyova A, Vats S, Nassim M, Kumar N, Van de Velde N. Immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 in Immunocompromised Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Using GRADE. Infect Dis Ther 2024; 13:1419-1438. [PMID: 38802704 PMCID: PMC11219657 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-024-00987-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Immunocompromised (IC) patients mount poor immune responses to vaccination. Higher-dose coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines may offer increased immunogenicity. METHODS A pairwise meta-analysis of 98 studies reporting comparisons of mRNA-1273 (50 or 100 mcg/dose) and BNT162b2 (30 mcg/dose) in IC adults was performed. Outcomes were seroconversion, total and neutralizing antibody titers, and cellular immune responses. RESULTS mRNA-1273 was associated with a significantly higher seroconversion likelihood [relative risk, 1.11 (95% CI, 1.08, 1.14); P < 0.0001; I2 = 66.8%] and higher total antibody titers [relative increase, 50.45% (95% CI, 34.63%, 66.28%); P < 0.0001; I2 = 89.5%] versus BNT162b2. mRNA-1273 elicited higher but statistically nonsignificant relative increases in neutralizing antibody titers and cellular immune responses versus BNT162b2. CONCLUSION Higher-dose mRNA-1273 had increased immunogenicity versus BNT162b2 in IC patients.
Collapse
|
3
|
Kamboj M, Bohlke K, Baptiste DM, Dunleavy K, Fueger A, Jones L, Kelkar AH, Law LY, LeFebvre KB, Ljungman P, Miller ED, Meyer LA, Moore HN, Soares HP, Taplitz RA, Woldetsadik ES, Kohn EC. Vaccination of Adults With Cancer: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1699-1721. [PMID: 38498792 PMCID: PMC11095883 DOI: 10.1200/jco.24.00032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To guide the vaccination of adults with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies. METHODS A systematic literature review identified systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and nonrandomized studies on the efficacy and safety of vaccines used by adults with cancer or their household contacts. This review builds on a 2013 guideline by the Infectious Disease Society of America. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 2013, to February 16, 2023. ASCO convened an Expert Panel to review the evidence and formulate recommendations. RESULTS A total of 102 publications were included in the systematic review: 24 systematic reviews, 14 RCTs, and 64 nonrandomized studies. The largest body of evidence addressed COVID-19 vaccines. RECOMMENDATIONS The goal of vaccination is to limit the severity of infection and prevent infection where feasible. Optimizing vaccination status should be considered a key element in the care of patients with cancer. This approach includes the documentation of vaccination status at the time of the first patient visit; timely provision of recommended vaccines; and appropriate revaccination after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, or B-cell-depleting therapy. Active interaction and coordination among healthcare providers, including primary care practitioners, pharmacists, and nursing team members, are needed. Vaccination of household contacts will enhance protection for patients with cancer. Some vaccination and revaccination plans for patients with cancer may be affected by the underlying immune status and the anticancer therapy received. As a result, vaccine strategies may differ from the vaccine recommendations for the general healthy adult population vaccine.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mini Kamboj
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Kari Bohlke
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | | | - Kieron Dunleavy
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC
| | - Abbey Fueger
- The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, Rye Brook, NY
| | - Lee Jones
- Fight Colorectal Cancer, Arlington, VA
| | - Amar H Kelkar
- Harvard Medical School, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Per Ljungman
- Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eric D Miller
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Larissa A Meyer
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Heloisa P Soares
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | - Elise C Kohn
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sharifi Aliabadi L, Azari M, Taherian MR, Barkhordar M, Abbas SAM, Azari M, Ahmadvand M, Salehi Z, Rouzbahani S, Vaezi M. Immunologic responses to the third and fourth doses of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines in cell therapy recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Virol J 2024; 21:103. [PMID: 38702752 PMCID: PMC11067217 DOI: 10.1186/s12985-024-02375-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple studies have provided evidence of suboptimal or poor immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cell therapy compared to healthy individuals. Given the dynamic nature of SARS-CoV2, characterized by the emergence of many viral variations throughout the general population, there is ongoing discussion regarding the optimal quantity and frequency of additional doses required to sustain protection against SARS-CoV2 especially in this susceptible population. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the immune responses of HSCT and CAR-T cell therapy recipients to additional doses of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. METHODS Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the study involved a comprehensive search across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, and Cochrane Biorxiv and medRxiv, focusing on the serological responses to the third and fourth vaccine doses in HSCT and CAR-T cell patients. RESULTS This study included 32 papers, with 31 qualifying for the meta-analysis. Results showed that after the third dose, the seroconversion rate in HSCT and CAR-T cell therapy recipients who didn't respond to the second dose was 46.10 and 17.26%, respectively. Following the fourth dose, HSCT patients had a seroconversion rate of 27.23%. Moreover, post-third-dose seropositivity rates were 87.14% for HSCT and 32.96% for CAR-T cell therapy recipients. Additionally, the seropositive response to the fourth dose in the HSCT group was 90.04%. CONCLUSION While a significant portion of HSCT recipients developed antibodies after additional vaccinations, only a minority of CAR-T cell therapy patients showed a similar response. This suggests that alternative vaccination strategies are needed to protect these vulnerable groups effectively. Moreover, few studies have reported cellular responses to additional SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations in these patients. Further studies evaluating cellular responses are required to determine a more precise assessment of immunogenicity strength against SARS-CoV-2 after additional doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leyla Sharifi Aliabadi
- Cell Therapy and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology and Cell Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mojtaba Azari
- Cell Therapy and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology and Cell Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Reza Taherian
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Maryam Barkhordar
- Cell Therapy and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
- Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology and Cell Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | | | - Morteza Azari
- Cell Therapy and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology and Cell Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Ahmadvand
- Cell Therapy and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology and Cell Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Zahra Salehi
- Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology and Cell Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shiva Rouzbahani
- Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Mohammad Vaezi
- Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology and Cell Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mori Y, Uchida N, Wake A, Miyawaki K, Eto T, Nakamura T, Iwasaki H, Ito Y, Tanimoto K, Katayama Y, Imamura Y, Takahashi T, Fujisaki T, Kamimura T, Choi I, Ishitsuka K, Yoshimoto G, Ogawa R, Sugita J, Takamatsu Y, Tanimoto K, Hidaka T, Miyamoto T, Akashi K, Nagafuji K. Impact of a third dose of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: A Japanese multicenter observational study. Vaccine 2023; 41:6899-6903. [PMID: 37866994 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.08.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
This prospective observational study aimed to assess the serological response and safety after the third booster shot of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in 292 hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. In our patients, mild systemic reactions were present in 10-40% and GVHD aggravation in 1.1%. Overall, clinically relevant response (>250 U/mL) was observed in 93.1% of allogeneic (allo)-HCT recipients and 70.6% of autologous (auto)-HCT recipients, respectively. Of note, detectable antibody response with any titer following the first two doses was a powerful predictor for adequate response after booster shot in both cohorts. For such patients, 98.8% of allo- and 92.3% of auto-HCT recipients obtained clinically relevant response after dose 3. In addition, continued systemic steroid and/or calcineurin inhibitors at the booster shot significantly correlated with serological response. These findings highlighted that booster vaccination efficiently improved serological response without safety concerns and thus recommended for the majority of HCT recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuo Mori
- Department of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Science, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Uchida
- Department of Hematology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Atsushi Wake
- Department of Hematology, Toranomon Hospital Kajigaya, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Kohta Miyawaki
- Department of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Science, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Eto
- Department of Hematology, Hamanomachi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Takayuki Nakamura
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
| | - Hiromi Iwasaki
- Departments of Hematology, National Hospital Organization, Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshikiyo Ito
- Department of Hematology, Imamura General Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Kazushi Tanimoto
- Department of Hematology, Clinical Immunology, and Infectious Diseases, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan
| | - Yuta Katayama
- Department of Hematology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb Survivors Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yutaka Imamura
- Division of Hematology, St. Mary's Hospital, Kurume, Japan
| | | | - Tomoaki Fujisaki
- Department of Internal Medicine, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | | | - Ilseung Choi
- Department of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kenji Ishitsuka
- Department of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kagoshima University Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Goichi Yoshimoto
- Department of Hematology, Saga-Ken Medical Center Koseikan, Saga, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Ogawa
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, JCHO Kyushu Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Junichi Sugita
- Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yasushi Takamatsu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Hematology and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kazuki Tanimoto
- Department of Hematology, Fukuoka Red Cross Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tomonori Hidaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Miyamoto
- Department of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Science, Fukuoka, Japan; Division of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Koichi Akashi
- Department of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Science, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Koji Nagafuji
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Randi BA, Higashino HR, Silva VPD, Xavier EM, Rocha V, Costa SF. COVID-19 in hematopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical characteristics and outcomes. Rev Med Virol 2023; 33:e2483. [PMID: 37794598 DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
Patients who undergo hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) are more susceptible to developing severe forms of COVID-19 with an increased risk of mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze, by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis, all studies that evaluated COVID-19 in HSCT adult recipients and present clinical characteristics and outcomes. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they: (I) described the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in adult (aged 18 years old or above) HSCT recipients; (II) described outcomes of COVID-19 in this population, mainly lethality; (III) were full-text articles. We searched MedLine, Embase, SCOPUS, LILACS and Web of Science for full-text studies that evaluated COVID-19 in adult HSCT patients until 26 Apr 2023. Two independent reviewers screened the articles and extracted the data. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data was used to assess quality of the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed and the pooled prevalence of severe/critical disease and of death with a 95% CI was calculated with the random-effects model. Sixteen studies were included; seven (43.7%) were multicenter. Most of the studies were from Europe (37.5%). All of them had a low risk of bias using the JBI Checklist. A total of 1186 patients were included. Allogeneic HSCT patients were the majority in most studies, with a total of 861 patients (72.5%). The symptomatic rate was 79.4%. The pooled prevalence of severe/critical COVID-19 was 24.0% (95% CI 0.13-0.36; I2 = 94%; n = 334/990). The pooled prevalence of death for the entire population was 17% (95% CI 0.13-0.22; I2 = 76%; n = 221/1117), 17% (95% CI 0.12-0.23; I2 = 67%; n = 152/822) for allogeneic-HSCT and 14% (95% CI 0.08-0.22; I4 = 65%; n = 48/293) for autologous-HSCT. In conclusion, frequently the infection of SARS-CoV-2 in HSCT was symptomatic and lethality is higher than in general population. Thus, it is essential to focus on the implementation of measures to mitigate the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in this population, as well as to carefully assess HSCT recipients who develop COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Azevedo Randi
- Departamento de Moléstias Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Hermes Ryoiti Higashino
- Departamento de Moléstias Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Vinícius Ponzio da Silva
- Médico do grupo de infecção em imunodeprimidos da Unifesp/ Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Erick Menezes Xavier
- Departamento de Hematologia, Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Vanderson Rocha
- Departamento de Hematologia, Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Silvia Figueiredo Costa
- Departamento de Moléstias Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Laboratório de Investigação Médica em Protozoologia, Bacteriologia e Resistência Antimicrobiana - LIM/49, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Meejun T, Srisurapanont K, Manothummetha K, Thongkam A, Mejun N, Chuleerarux N, Sanguankeo A, Phongkhun K, Leksuwankun S, Thanakitcharu J, Lerttiendamrong B, Langsiri N, Torvorapanit P, Worasilchai N, Plongla R, Hirankarn N, Nematollahi S, Permpalung N, Moonla C, Kates OS. Attenuated immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and risk factors in stem cell transplant recipients: a meta-analysis. Blood Adv 2023; 7:5624-5636. [PMID: 37389818 PMCID: PMC10514108 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Immunogenicity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination is diminished in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. To summarize current evidence and identify risk factors for attenuated responses, 5 electronic databases were searched since database inceptions through 12 January 2023 for studies reporting humoral and/or cellular immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the HSCT population. Using descriptive statistics and random-effects models, extracted numbers of responders and pooled odds ratios (pORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for risk factors of negative immune responses were analyzed (PROSPERO: CRD42021277109). From 61 studies with 5906 HSCT recipients, after 1, 2, and 3 doses of messenger RNA (mRNA) SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, the mean antispike antibody seropositivity rates (95% CI) were 38% (19-62), 81% (77-84), and 80% (75-84); neutralizing antibody seropositivity rates were 52% (40-64), 71% (54-83), and 78% (61-89); and cellular immune response rates were 52% (39-64), 66% (51-79), and 72% (52-86). After 2 vaccine doses, risk factors (pOR; 95% CI) associated with antispike seronegativity were male recipients (0.63; 0.49-0.83), recent rituximab exposure (0.09; 0.03-0.21), haploidentical allografts (0.46; 0.22-0.95), <24 months from HSCT (0.25; 0.07-0.89), lymphopenia (0.18; 0.13-0.24), hypogammaglobulinemia (0.23; 0.10-0.55), concomitant chemotherapy (0.48; 0.29-0.78) and immunosuppression (0.18; 0.13-0.25). Complete remission of underlying hematologic malignancy (2.55; 1.05-6.17) and myeloablative conditioning (1.72; 1.30-2.28) compared with reduced-intensity conditioning were associated with antispike seropositivity. Ongoing immunosuppression (0.31; 0.10-0.99) was associated with poor cellular immunogenicity. In conclusion, attenuated humoral and cellular immune responses to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are associated with several risk factors among HSCT recipients. Optimizing individualized vaccination and developing alternative COVID-19 prevention strategies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanaporn Meejun
- Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | | | - Kasama Manothummetha
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Achitpol Thongkam
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nuthchaya Mejun
- Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nipat Chuleerarux
- Department of Medicine, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL
| | - Anawin Sanguankeo
- Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kasidis Phongkhun
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Surachai Leksuwankun
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | | | - Nattapong Langsiri
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pattama Torvorapanit
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
- Thai Red Cross Emerging Infectious Diseases Clinical Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Rongpong Plongla
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nattiya Hirankarn
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Saman Nematollahi
- Department of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ
| | - Nitipong Permpalung
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Chatphatai Moonla
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
- Center of Excellence in Translational Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Olivia S. Kates
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Overheu O, Lendowski S, Quast DR, Kühn D, Vidal Blanco E, Kraeft AL, Steinmann E, Kourti E, Lugnier C, Steinmann J, Reinacher-Schick A, Pfaender S. Longitudinal data on humoral response and neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and subvariants BA.4/5 and BQ.1.1 after COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:10633-10644. [PMID: 37300723 PMCID: PMC10257184 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04961-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant of concern (VOC) and subvariants like BQ.1.1 demonstrate immune evasive potential. Little is known about the efficacy of booster vaccinations regarding this VOC and subvariants in cancer patients. This study is among the first to provide data on neutralizing antibodies (nAb) against BQ.1.1. METHODS Cancer patients at our center were prospectively enrolled between 01/2021 and 02/2022. Medical data and blood samples were collected at enrollment and before and after every SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS We analyzed 408 samples from 148 patients (41% female), mainly with solid tumors (85%) on active therapy (92%; 80% chemotherapy). SARS-CoV-2 IgG and nAb titers decreased over time, however, significantly increased following third vaccination (p < 0.0001). NAb (ND50) against Omicron BA.1 was minimal prior and increased significantly after the third vaccination (p < 0.0001). ND50 titers against BQ.1.1 after the third vaccination were significantly lower than against BA.1 and BA.4/5 (p < 0.0001) and undetectable in half of the patients (48%). Factors associated with impaired immune response were hematologic malignancies, B cell depleting therapy and higher age. Choice of vaccine, sex and treatment with chemo-/immunotherapy did not influence antibody response. Patients with breakthrough infections had significantly lower nAb titers after both 6 months (p < 0.001) and the third vaccination (p = 0.018). CONCLUSION We present the first data on nAb against BQ.1.1 following the third vaccination in cancer patients. Our results highlight the threat that new emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants pose to cancer patients and support efforts to apply repeated vaccines. Since a considerable number of patients did not display an adequate immune response, continuing to exhibit caution remains reasonable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Overheu
- Department of Hematology and Oncology with Palliative Care, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany.
| | - Simon Lendowski
- Department of Hematology and Oncology with Palliative Care, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Daniel R Quast
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Daniel Kühn
- Department of Molecular and Medical Virology, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Elena Vidal Blanco
- Department of Molecular and Medical Virology, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Anna-Lena Kraeft
- Department of Hematology and Oncology with Palliative Care, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Eike Steinmann
- Department of Molecular and Medical Virology, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Eleni Kourti
- Department of Hematology and Oncology with Palliative Care, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Celine Lugnier
- Department of Hematology and Oncology with Palliative Care, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Joerg Steinmann
- Institute of Clinical Hygiene, Medical Microbiology and Infectiology, Klinikum Nürnberg, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Anke Reinacher-Schick
- Department of Hematology and Oncology with Palliative Care, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Stephanie Pfaender
- Department of Molecular and Medical Virology, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Barkhordar M, Chahardouli B, Biglari A, Ahmadvand M, Bahri T, Alaeddini F, Sharifi Aliabadi L, Noorani SS, Bagheri Amiri F, Biglari M, Shemshadi MR, Ghavamzadeh A, Vaezi M. Three doses of a recombinant conjugated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine early after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: predicting indicators of a high serologic response-a prospective, single-arm study. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1169666. [PMID: 37153556 PMCID: PMC10154585 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1169666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) recipients must be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 as quickly as possible after transplantation. The difficulty in obtaining recommended SARS-CoV-2 vaccines for allo-HSCT recipients motivated us to utilize an accessible and affordable SARS-CoV-2 vaccine with a recombinant receptor-binding domain (RBD)-tetanus toxoid (TT)-conjugated platform shortly after allo-HSCT in the developing country of Iran. Methods This prospective, single-arm study aimed to investigate immunogenicity and its predictors following a three-dose SARS-CoV-2 RBD-TT-conjugated vaccine regimen administered at 4-week (± 1-week) intervals in patients within 3-12 months post allo-HSCT. An immune status ratio (ISR) was measured at baseline and 4 weeks (± 1 week) after each vaccine dose using a semiquantitative immunoassay. Using the median ISR as a cut-off point for immune response intensity, we performed a logistic regression analysis to determine the predictive impact of several baseline factors on the intensity of the serologic response following the third vaccination dose. Results Thirty-six allo-HSCT recipients, with a mean age of 42.42 years and a median time of 133 days between hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) and the start of vaccination, were analyzed. Our findings, using the generalized estimating equation (GEE) model, indicated that, compared with the baseline ISR of 1.55 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 to 2.17], the ISR increased significantly during the three-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccination regimen. The ISR reached 2.32 (95% CI 1.84 to 2.79; p = 0.010) after the second dose and 3.87 (95% CI 3.25 to 4.48; p = 0.001) after the third dose of vaccine, reflecting 69.44% and 91.66% seropositivity, respectively. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the female sex of the donor [odds ratio (OR) 8.67; p = 0.028] and a higher level donor ISR at allo-HSCT (OR 3.56; p = 0.050) were the two positive predictors of strong immune response following the third vaccine dose. No serious adverse events (i.e., grades 3 and 4) were observed following the vaccination regimen. Conclusions We concluded that early vaccination of allo-HSCT recipients with a three-dose RBD-TT-conjugated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is safe and could improve the early post-allo-HSCT immune response. We further believe that the pre-allo-HSCT SARS-CoV-2 immunization of donors may enhance post-allo-HSCT seroconversion in allo-HSCT recipients who receive the entire course of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine during the first year after allo-HSCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Barkhordar
- Cell Therapy and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology, and Cell Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- *Correspondence: Mohammad Vaezi, ; Maryam Barkhordar,
| | - Bahram Chahardouli
- Cell Therapy and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology, and Cell Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Alireza Biglari
- Department of Medical Genetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Ahmadvand
- Cell Therapy and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology, and Cell Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Tanaz Bahri
- Cell Therapy and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology, and Cell Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farshid Alaeddini
- Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Leyla Sharifi Aliabadi
- Cell Therapy and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology, and Cell Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seied Saeid Noorani
- Cell Therapy and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology, and Cell Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fahimeh Bagheri Amiri
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Centre for Emerging and Reemerging Infectious Diseases, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Biglari
- Cell Therapy and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology, and Cell Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Reza Shemshadi
- Cell Therapy and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology, and Cell Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ardeshir Ghavamzadeh
- Cancer & Cell Therapy Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Vaezi
- Cell Therapy and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology, and Cell Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- *Correspondence: Mohammad Vaezi, ; Maryam Barkhordar,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hütter-Krönke ML, Neagoie A, Blau IW, Wais V, Vuong L, Gantner A, Ahn J, Penack O, Schnell J, Nogai KA, Eberspächer B, Saadati M, Benner A, Bullinger L, Döhner H, Bunjes D, Sala E. Risk factors and characteristics influencing humoral response to COVID-19 vaccination in patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1174289. [PMID: 37207199 PMCID: PMC10190126 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1174289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is approved and recommended for immunocompromised patients such as patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Since infections represent a relevant cause of transplant related mortality we analyzed the advent of immunization to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in a bicentric population of allogeneic transplanted patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data of allo-SCT recipients in two German transplantation centers for safety and serologic response after two and three SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations. Patients received mRNA vaccines or vector-based vaccines. All patients were monitored for antibodies against SARS-CoV2-spike protein (anti-S-IgG) with an IgG ELISA assay or an EIA Assay after two and three doses of vaccination. Results A total of 243 allo-SCT patients underwent SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The median age was 59 years (range 22-81). While 85% of patients received two doses of mRNA vaccines, 10% had vector-based vaccines and 5% received a mixed vaccination. The two vaccine doses were well tolerated with only 3% patients developing a reactivation of graft versus host disease (GvHD). Overall, 72% of patients showed a humoral response after two vaccinations. In the multivariate analysis age at time of allo-SCT (p=0.0065), ongoing immunosuppressive therapy (p= 0.029) and lack of immune reconstitution (CD4-T-cell counts <200/μl, p< 0.001) were associated with no response. Sex, intensity of conditioning and the use of ATG showed no influence on seroconversion. Finally, 44 out of 69 patients that did not respond after the second dose received a booster and 57% (25/44) showed a seroconversion. Discussion We showed in our bicentric allo-SCT patient cohort, that a humoral response could be achieve after the regular approved schedule, especially for those patients who underwent immune reconstitution and were free from immunosuppressive drugs. In over 50% of the initial non-responders after 2-dose vaccination, a seroconversion can be achieved by boostering with a third dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Luise Hütter-Krönke
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Berlin, Germany
- *Correspondence: Marie Luise Hütter-Krönke,
| | - Adela Neagoie
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Igor Wolfgang Blau
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Verena Wais
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Lam Vuong
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrea Gantner
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Johann Ahn
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Olaf Penack
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jacqueline Schnell
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Klaus Axel Nogai
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bettina Eberspächer
- Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, Labor Berlin- Charité Vivantes GmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Axel Benner
- Division of Biostatistics, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lars Bullinger
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hartmut Döhner
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Donald Bunjes
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Elisa Sala
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|