Treat and Extend Treatment Interval Patterns with Anti-VEGF Therapy in nAMD Patients

One-Year and 18-Month Outcomes in nAMD Patient Eyes Switched to Brolucizumab Alone versus to Brolucizumab Alternating with Other Anti-VEGF Agents

Objective

Retrospective, real-world study to evaluate visual acuity (VA), anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection intervals, and central macular thickness (CMT) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) eyes switched to brolucizumab only or to brolucizumab alternating with another anti-VEGF.

Methods

The overall study population comprised eyes that were given ≥1 brolucizumab injection between 1 October 2019 and 30 November 2021. The brolucizumab-only (BRO) cohort consisted of prior anti-VEGF-treated eyes treated exclusively with ≥3 brolucizumab injections over ≥12 or ≥18 months; the alternating brolucizumab (ALT) cohort comprised prior anti-VEGF-treated eyes treated with ≥2 brolucizumab injections and ≥1 other anti-VEGF over ≥12 or ≥18 months.

Results

A total of 482 eyes received ≥1 brolucizumab injection during the study period. Mean VA changes from baseline were -1.1±15.1 letters (BRO cohort; n = 174) and 1.3±13.0 letters (ALT cohort; n = 47) at Month 12, and 0.0±13.5 letters (BRO cohort; n = 95) and -7.3±17.2 letters (ALT cohort; n = 29) at Month 18. Mean changes in injection intervals were +26.9±48.1 days (BRO cohort) and +11.1±17.3 days (ALT cohort) at Month 12 and +36.3±52.3 days (BRO cohort) and +14.0±19.9 days (ALT cohort) at Month 18. Mean changes in CMT were -35.2±108.1 μm (BRO cohort) and -31.5±91.2 μm (ALT cohort) at Month 12 and -38.9±75.0 μm (BRO cohort) and -9.0±59.9 μm (ALT cohort) at Month 18. Intraocular inflammation-related adverse events were recorded in 22/482 (4.6%) eyes.

Conclusion

Treatment with either brolucizumab alone or brolucizumab alternating with another anti-VEGF can preserve vision, reduce CMT, and extend anti-VEGF injection intervals in patients with nAMD.

Targeting angiogenesis in oncology, ophthalmology and beyond

Angiogenesis is an essential process in normal development and in adult physiology, but can be disrupted in numerous diseases. The concept of targeting angiogenesis for treating diseases was proposed more than 50 years ago, and the first two drugs targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), bevacizumab and pegaptanib, were approved in 2004 for the treatment of cancer and neovascular ophthalmic diseases, respectively. Since then, nearly 20 years of clinical experience with anti-angiogenic drugs (AADs) have demonstrated the importance of this therapeutic modality for these disorders. However, there is a need to improve clinical outcomes by enhancing therapeutic efficacy, overcoming drug resistance, defining surrogate markers, combining with other drugs and developing the next generation of therapeutics. In this Review, we examine emerging new targets, the development of new drugs and challenging issues such as the mode of action of AADs and elucidating mechanisms underlying clinical benefits; we also discuss possible future directions of the field.

STRICT PRO RE NATA VERSUS TREAT-AND-EXTEND REGIMENS IN NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

PURPOSE

To compare the visual and anatomical outcomes between strict pro re nata (strict PRN) and treat-and-extend (T&E) anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) regimens for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

METHODS

A meta-analysis of 1-year and 2-year changes between strict PRN and T&E anti-VEGF regimens were conducted in both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world studies (RWSs). The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and weighted mean numbers of visits and injections were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 19 RCTs and 23 RWSs (2,530 eyes in strict PRN and 4,399 eyes in T&E) were included. Mean BCVA change in strict PRN group in both 1-year and 2-year (5.95 and 5.78, respectively) was noninferior to the T&E group (7.85 and 5.96, respectively). Mean CRT changes were also similar in both strict PRN and T&E groups. Mean number of visits were significantly more in the strict PRN group, whereas mean number of injections was significantly more in the T&E group.

CONCLUSION

The strict PRN regimen demonstrates a noninferior BCVA improvement to the T&E regimen, achieving fewer injections, and may be both economically and medically beneficial. Both selections should be provided to patients with an overall consideration.

Safety and Efficacy of a Treat-and-Extend Regimen of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents for Diabetic Macular Edema or Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

[Box: see text] Background and Objective: This meta-analysis evaluates treat-and-extend regimens relative to monthly and as-needed (prn) regimens using anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents for diabetic macular edema and macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Comparative studies evaluating a treat-and-extend regimen relative to a monthly or prn regimen with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for diabetic macular edema or macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion were included following a systematic literature search.

RESULTS

Seven studies of 984 eyes were included. Relative to a monthly regimen, treat-and-extend was similar for change in best-corrected visual acuity at final follow-up (P = .59) and had a lower number of injections (P < .00001). Relative to a prn regimen, treat-and-extend was similar for change in best-corrected visual acuity at final follow-up (P = .84) and was associated with a higher number of injections (P = .02).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis found that a treat-and extend regimen was nonsignificantly different compared to monthly and prn regimens in efficacy and safety end points. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54(3):131-138.].

Predictive, preventive, and personalized management of retinal fluid via computer-aided detection app for optical coherence tomography scans

Aims

Computer-aided detection systems for retinal fluid could be beneficial for disease monitoring and management by chronic age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and diabetic retinopathy (DR) patients, to assist in disease prevention via early detection before the disease progresses to a "wet AMD" pathology or diabetic macular edema (DME), requiring treatment. We propose a proof-of-concept AI-based app to help predict fluid via a "fluid score", prevent fluid progression, and provide personalized, serial monitoring, in the context of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (PPPM) for patients at risk of retinal fluid complications.

Methods

The app comprises a convolutional neural network-Vision Transformer (CNN-ViT)-based segmentation deep learning (DL) network, trained on a small dataset of 100 training images (augmented to 992 images) from the Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases (SEED) study, together with a CNN-based classification network trained on 8497 images, that can detect fluid vs. non-fluid optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans. Both networks are validated on external datasets.

Results

Internal testing for our segmentation network produced an IoU score of 83.0% (95% CI = 76.7-89.3%) and a DICE score of 90.4% (86.3-94.4%); for external testing, we obtained an IoU score of 66.7% (63.5-70.0%) and a DICE score of 78.7% (76.0-81.4%). Internal testing of our classification network produced an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 99.18%, and a Youden index threshold of 0.3806; for external testing, we obtained an AUC of 94.55%, and an accuracy of 94.98% and an F1 score of 85.73% with Youden index.

Conclusion

We have developed an AI-based app with an alternative transformer-based segmentation algorithm that could potentially be applied in the clinic with a PPPM approach for serial monitoring, and could allow for the generation of retrospective data to research into the varied use of treatments for AMD and DR. The modular system of our app can be scaled to add more iterative features based on user feedback for more efficient monitoring. Further study and scaling up of the algorithm dataset could potentially boost its usability in a real-world clinical setting.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13167-022-00301-5.

Ranibizumab port delivery system: a clinical perspective

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) represents a leading cause of blindness worldwide. Neovascular AMD (nAMD) is a subtype of AMD most frequently treated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (aVEGF) injections, which has allowed for patients to maintain vision that would have otherwise been lost. However, the need for frequent intravitreal injections for optimal results poses a risk for undertreatment in nAMD patients due to the high treatment burden associated with current aVEGF therapy. Many novel agents and pathways are being explored and targeted for less burdensome treatment options, one of which is the ranibizumab port delivery system (PDS). The PDS is a surgically implanted, refillable device that allows for the sustained release of ranibizumab, a widely used aVEGF agent, into the vitreous cavity. Positive results non-inferior to monthly ranibizumab injections in both phase II and phase III clinical trials allowed for FDA approval of the device with refill intervals of 6 months, which represents the longest approved treatment interval to date for nAMD therapy. This article reviews the need for a durable nAMD treatment option in real-world practice, the clinical trial and extension study data for the PDS, the risk of adverse events and safety profile of the PDS and the potential clinical role of the PDS in answering the real-world needs of nAMD treatment. In addition, other pipeline sustained-treatment modalities are discussed in the context of ongoing clinical trials.

Efficacy Outcomes of Brolucizumab Versus Aflibercept in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Patients with Early Residual Fluid

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of brolucizumab versus aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration with early residual fluid in the HAWK and HARRIER studies.

DESIGN

Post hoc analysis using pooled data from the phase 3 studies HAWK (NCT02307682) and HARRIER (NCT02434328).

PARTICIPANTS

The early residual fluid cohort for this post hoc analysis consisted of patients treated with either brolucizumab 6 mg (n = 730 patients) or aflibercept 2 mg (n = 729 patients) and who had the presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), or both verified by spectral-domain OCT at the week 12 clinic visit.

METHODS

After 3 initial monthly doses, patients treated with brolucizumab received injections every 12 weeks (q12w) or every 8 weeks (q8w), depending on the neovascular age-related macular degeneration disease activity, whereas patients treated with aflibercept received fixed q8w dosing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The mean change in best-corrected visual acuity and central subfield thickness (CST) from the baseline to that at weeks 48 and 96, the proportion of patients treated with brolucizumab remaining on q12w dosing to week 96, and the change in fluid status at weeks 48 and 96.

RESULTS

All analyses were based on 149 of 730 (20.4%) patients treated with brolucizumab and 217 of 729 (29.8%) patients treated with aflibercept with spectral-domain OCT-verified IRF, SRF, or both at their week 12 visit. The best-corrected visual acuity improvements from baseline at weeks 48 and 96 were numerically better for brolucizumab than for aflibercept (least square mean [standard error] 7.9 ± 1.1 vs. 4.6 ± 0.9 and 7.4 ± 1.3 vs. 2.9 ± 1.1 letters, respectively). The CST reductions from baseline at weeks 48 and 96 were consistently greater with brolucizumab than with aflibercept (least square mean [standard error], μm: -194.9 ± 13.7 vs. -123.9 ± 11.3; and -201.1 ± 14.5 vs. -134.2 ± 12.0, respectively). At weeks 48 and 96, patients treated with brolucizumab had a 40.4% and 31.3% probability of remaining on q12w dosing intervals, respectively. Fewer patients treated with brolucizumab had remaining IRF, SRF, or both at weeks 48 and 96 than patients treated with aflibercept (59.1% vs. 75.1% and 49.0% vs. 60.4%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with early residual fluid, defined as spectral-domain OCT-verified IRF, SRF, or both at the week 12 clinic visit, brolucizumab resolved the early residual fluid and reduced CST more effectively than aflibercept, resulting in greater best-corrected visual acuity improvements through week 96 of anti-VEGF treatment.

Ganglion Cell Layer Thickness Change in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treated With Anti-VEGF Injections

Purpose:

This work assesses bilateral ganglion cell layer–inner plexiform layer (GCL-IPL) thickness changes in patients with unilateral neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF).

Methods:

In this single-center, retrospective, cohort study, the medical records of patients with unilateral nAMD treated with anti-VEGF were reviewed. The treated group included eyes with newly diagnosed nAMD that subsequently underwent treatment with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. The control group was the fellow eye with dry AMD. Eyes receiving at least 10 intravitreal injections were included. Measurement of GCL-IPL thickness was performed at different time points using spectral domain–optical coherence tomography.

Results:

A total of 216 eyes of 108 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age ± SD was 80.1 ± 10.7 years. Eyes in the treated group underwent a mean ± SD of 20.2 ± 7.2 injections in 21.3 ± 6.8 months. At baseline, average mean ± SD of GCL-IPL thickness was 73.71 ± 8.81 µm and 73.84 ± 8.26 µm in the treated and fellow eye, respectively ( P = .795). After 10 injections the average thickness was 65.41 ± 14.08 µm and 68.77 ± 13.24 µm in the treated and fellow eye, respectively ( P = .007). The absolute decrease in thickness was significantly greater in the treated eye than the fellow eye (mean ± SD, 8.31 ± 11.19 µm vs 5.07 ± 10.83 µm, respectively; P = .002).

Conclusions:

GCL-IPL thickness decreased significantly in the treated group more than in the control group after 10 anti-VEGF injections. The mechanism and clinical significance of this observation warrants further study.

TENAYA and LUCERNE

Purpose

To describe the design and rationale of the phase 3 TENAYA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03823287) and LUCERNE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03823300) trials that aimed to assess efficacy, safety, and durability of faricimab, the first bispecific antibody for intraocular use, which independently binds and neutralizes both angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) versus aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Design

Identical, global, double-masked, randomized, controlled, phase 3 clinical trials.

Participants

Adults with treatment-naïve nAMD.

Methods

These trials were designed to evaluate patients randomized to receive faricimab 6.0 mg up to every 16 weeks after 4 initial every-4-week doses or aflibercept 2.0 mg every 8 weeks after 3 initial every-4-week doses. The initial doses in the faricimab arm were followed by individualized fixed treatment intervals up to week 60, based on disease activity assessment at weeks 20 and 24, guided by central subfield thickness, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and investigator assessment. The primary efficacy end point was BCVA change from baseline averaged over weeks 40, 44, and 48. Secondary end points included the proportion of patients receiving every-8-week, every-12-week, and every-16-week faricimab and anatomic outcomes. Safety outcomes included incidence and severity of ocular and nonocular adverse events. From week 60, faricimab-treated patients followed a personalized treatment interval (PTI), a novel protocol-driven treat-and-extend regimen with interval adjustment from every 8 weeks to every 16 weeks based on individualized treatment response measured by anatomic criteria, functional criteria, and investigator assessment of patients’ disease activity.

Main Outcome Measures

Rationale for trial design and PTI approach.

Results

The TENAYA and LUCERNE trials were the first registrational trials in nAMD to test fixed dosing regimens up to every 16 weeks based on patients' disease activity in year 1 and incorporate a PTI paradigm during year 2. The PTI approach was designed to tailor treatment intervals to individual patient needs, to reflect clinical practice treatment practice, and to reduce treatment burden.

Conclusions

The innovative trial design rationale for the TENAYA and LUCERNE trials included maximizing the benefits of angiopoietin-2 blockade through dosing up to every 16 weeks and PTI regimens based on patients' disease activity while fulfilling health authority requirements for potential registrational efforts.

Ocular Therapeutics and Molecular Delivery Strategies for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (nAMD)

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of vision loss in geriatric population. Intravitreal (IVT) injections are popular clinical option. Biologics and small molecules offer efficacy but relatively shorter half-life after intravitreal injections. To address these challenges, numerous technologies and therapies are under development. Most of these strategies aim to reduce the frequency of injections, thereby increasing patient compliance and reducing patient-associated burden. Unlike IVT frequent injections, molecular therapies such as cell therapy and gene therapy offer restoration ability hence gained a lot of traction. The recent approval of ocular gene therapy for inherited disease offers new hope in this direction. However, until such breakthrough therapies are available to the majority of patients, antibody therapeutics will be on the shelf, continuing to provide therapeutic benefits. The present review aims to highlight the status of pre-clinical and clinical studies of neovascular AMD treatment modalities including Anti-VEGF therapy, upcoming bispecific antibodies, small molecules, port delivery systems, photodynamic therapy, radiation therapy, gene therapy, cell therapy, and combination therapies.

Evolving Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Over a Decade

PURPOSE

Management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) has evolved over the last decade with several treatment regimens and medications. This study describes the treatment patterns and visual outcomes over 10 years in a large cohort of patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of electronic health records from 27 National Health Service secondary care healthcare providers in the UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Treatment-naïve patients receiving at least 3 intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections for nAMD in their first 6 months of follow-up were included. Patients with missing data for age or gender and those aged less than 55 years were excluded.

METHODS

Eyes with at least 3 years of follow-up were grouped by years of treatment initiation, and 3-year outcomes were compared between the groups. Data were generated during routine clinical care between September 2008 and December 2018.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual acuity (VA), number of injections, and number of visits.

RESULTS

A total of 15 810 eyes of 13 705 patients receiving 195 104 injections were included. Visual acuity improved from baseline during the first year, but decreased thereafter, resulting in loss of visual gains. This trend remained consistent throughout the past decade. Although an increasing proportion of eyes remained in the driving standard, this was driven by better presenting VA over the decade. The number of injections decreased substantially between the first and subsequent years, from a mean of 6.25 in year 1 to 3 in year 2 and 2.5 in year 3, without improvement over the decade. In a multivariable regression analysis, final VA improved by 0.24 letters for each year since 2008, and younger age and baseline VA were significantly associated with VA at 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that despite improvement in functional VA over the years, primarily driven by improving baseline VA, patients continue to lose vision after the first year of treatment, with only marginal change over the past decade. The data suggest these results may be related to suboptimal treatment patterns, which have not improved over the years. Rethinking treatment strategies may be warranted, possibly on a national level or through the introduction of longer-acting therapies.

Real Life Data of Treat and Extend Intravitreal Ranibizumab and Aflibercept Therapy in Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration Patients: 3-Year Results

Purpose

To compare functional and anatomic outcome of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) treatments in neovascular age-related macular degeneration by using the treat and extend (TE) protocol.

Methods

In this retrospective chart study, treatment naïve 74 eyes of 74 age-related macular degeneration patients treated with IVR and IVA (38 eyes in IVR and 36 eyes in IVA group) with TE protocol were included. Following three consecutive monthly intravitreal injections, TE protocol was applied to each group. Patients were followed up for at least 36 months. Mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macula thickness (CMT) and injection numbers over 3 years were compared.

Results

Among 36 months period, the mean number of injections was 17 ± 4 for both groups (p > 0.05). In terms of CMT, there was no statistically significant difference between groups at 36 months compared to baseline. A decrease of 72.55 ± 39.37 μm in CMT was detected in IVR group, whereas the decrease was 70.58 ± 33.96 μm in IVA group (p > 0.05). There was a significant increase in BCVA at 36 months of measurements. In addition, BCVA demonstrated an increase of 4.1 ± 0.44 letters in IVR group and 4.36 ± 0.67 letters in IVA group after 36 months compared to the baseline (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Both IVR and IVA injections provided significant improvements and stability in BCVA and CMT, however there was no significant difference between IVR and IVA injections with TE protocol of 36 months.

Questionnaire for the assessment of adherence barriers of intravitreal therapy: the ABQ-IVT

Objective

To develop and validate a questionnaire for the investigation of non-adherence (NA) barriers in patients receiving intravitreal injection (IVT).

Design

Questionnaire development and cross-sectional patient survey combined with a retrospective medical chart review.

Participants

German patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) or diabetic macular edema (DME) receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment via IVT.

Methods

The previously validated (indications: atrial fibrillation, human immunodeficiency virus, chronic inflammatory lung disease) Adherence Barriers Questionnaire (ABQ) was revised according to specifications of IVT, within the framework of an expert panel. The ABQ-IVT, which initially consisted of 24 items formulated as statements (4-point-Likert-scale ranging from “strongly agree” to “strongly disagree”), was applied in a cross-sectional survey. Evaluation of the questionnaire included an assessment of internal consistency and factor analysis. The occurrence of potential barriers in the patient sample was evaluated using descriptive statistics. To identify patient subpopulations, hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using ABQ-IVT answers as predictors. Due to difficulties in capturing NA as an external criterion, the evaluation of the questionnaire was limited to its internal validity and reliability.

Main outcome measures

Patients’ answers to the ABQ-IVT questionnaire and interviews.

Results

Of 253 patients, 234 (92%) were able to complete the ABQ-IVT questionnaire. Within the reliability analysis, the ABQ-IVT was reduced to 17 items. The condensed questionnaire demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.78), and factor analysis showed no evidence for subscales of the questionnaire. Nearly half of the patients (49%) reported being affected by at least three different barriers. On average, a patient was affected by 3.1 barriers. The most frequently reported barriers were “Challenge due to time commitment of physician visits” (45% of the patients), “Depression” (29%) and “Travel and opportunity costs” (27%). Cluster analysis identified six patient subpopulations, each affected by different sets of barriers and differed regarding their patient characteristics.

Conclusions

The ABQ-IVT is a practical and reliable instrument for identifying patient-specific barriers to IVT treatment adherence. In practice, the questionnaire may be useful in assessing whether individual patients are at higher risk of NA due to specific adherence barriers. Aside from better awareness, this allows earlier interventions, though these still need to be validated. Patient subpopulations face different barriers and may, therefore, need distinct preventative care.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40942-021-00311-x.

Ocular Pharmacokinetics of Intravitreally Injected Protein Therapeutics: Comparison among Standard-of-Care Formats

The current standard of care for antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment requires frequent intravitreal (IVT) injections of protein therapeutics, as a result of limited retention within the eye. A thorough understanding of the determinants of ocular pharmacokinetics (PK) and its translation across species is an essential prerequisite for developing more durable treatments. In this work, we studied the ocular PK in macaques of the protein formats that comprise today's anti-VEGF standard of care. Cynomolgus monkeys received a single IVT injection of a single-chain variable fragment (scFv, brolucizumab), antigen-binding fragment (Fab, ranibizumab), fragment crystallizable-fusion protein (Fc-fusion, aflibercept), or immunoglobulin G monoclonal antibody (IgG, VA2 CrossMAb). Drug concentrations were determined in aqueous humor samples collected up to 42 days postinjection using immunoassay methods. The ocular half-life (t_1/2) was 2.28, 2.62, 3.13, and 3.26 days for scFv, Fab, Fc-fusion, and IgG, respectively. A correlation with human t_1/2 values from the literature confirmed the translational significance of the cynomolgus monkey as an animal model for ocular research. The relation between ocular t_1/2 and molecular size was also investigated. Size was inferred from the molecular weight (MW) or determined experimentally by dynamic light scattering. The MW and hydrodynamic radius were found to be good predictors for the ocular t_1/2 of globular proteins. The analysis showed that molecular size is a determinant of ocular disposition and may be used in lieu of dedicated PK studies in animals.

Anti-VEGF Treatment Patterns in Patients With Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To characterize on-label anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment patterns in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in clinical practice in the U.S.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort analysis using administrative claims data from the IQVIA Open Source Databases. Treatment-naïve patients in the U.S. who received one or more wet AMD-related anti-VEGF injection from July 1, 2013, to April 30, 2017, were included. The main outcome was the injection interval closest to Month 12.

RESULTS

This study included 21,960 patients who initiated an anti-VEGF agent (ranibizumab, aflibercept, or bevacizumab): 5,489 initiated aflibercept and 4,253 initiated ranibizumab. Among ranibizumab, aflibercept, and all anti-VEGF eyes, 38.1% (n = 2,035), 33.5% (n = 3,262), and 40.0% (n = 12,505) of patient eyes had injection intervals of less than 8 weeks, respectively, at Month 12 with the mean (standard deviation) number of injections over 12 months being 8.0 (2.4), 7.6 (2.4), and 7.8 (2.5).

CONCLUSION

A substantial proportion of patients receive injections more frequently than every 8 weeks within the first year of treatment. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021;52:263-272.].

Real-World Treatment Patterns in a Population With Neovascular AMD Treated With Anti-VEGF Agents

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To characterize mean number of injections, injection type, and injection frequency during the first year of treatment; assess factors significantly related to injection interval; and identify predictive factors related to patient outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective, noncomparative, nonrandomized cohort study of ocular treatment with intravitreal injections of bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Data from January 1, 2012, through March 31, 2018, were systematically extracted from the electronic medical record system at Cole Eye Institute. Eligible patients had three or more injections within the first 12 months of treatment and received no prior injections.

RESULTS

Patients received an average 8.12 ± 2.45 injections, and 45% of patients received injections at an interval of 8 weeks or less (≤q8 weeks), 33% received injections at 8 to 12 weeks (q8-12 weeks), and 22% received injections at greater than 12 weeks (>q12 weeks). Age (P = .007) and initial central subfield thickness (CST) (P = .043) had statistically significant trend relationships (P = .007) with injection interval, whereas younger patients and patients with higher CST measurements tended to have shorter injection intervals. Injection interval was a significant predictor of visual acuity (VA) and CST. Patients receiving injections at q8-12 weeks were more likely to have better VA outcomes than patients with injection intervals at ≤q8 weeks (odds ratio [OR] = 1.66 [1.16, 2.37]; P = .005). Patients receiving injections at >q12 weeks did not show a significant improvement in VA (P = .06) and were more likely to have worse CST outcomes than patients receiving injections at ≤q8 weeks (OR = 1.95 [1.17, 3.26]; P = .011).

CONCLUSION

A significant portion of patients receive injections at an interval longer than every 8 weeks. Age and baseline CST had a significant relationship with injection interval. Injection interval was a significant predictor of VA and CST at 1 year. Patients with an injection interval of >q12 weeks tended to have less VA improvement and CST reduction compared to the ≤q8 weeks and q8-12 weeks groups. These findings suggest an extended injection interval >q12 weeks may be at the expense of potential VA improvement. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021;52:190-198.].