Preliminary report of multiple cell therapy for patients with multiple system atrophy

Clinical results of neurorestorative cell therapies and therapeutic indications according to cellular bio-proprieties

Cell therapies have been explored to treat patients with nervous diseases for over 20 years. Even though most kinds of cell therapies demonstrated neurorestorative effects in non-randomized clinical trials; the effects of the majority type cells could not be confirmed by randomized controlled trials. In this review, clinical therapeutic results of neurorestorative cell therapies according to cellular bio-proprieties or cellular functions were introduced. Currently it was demonstrated from analysis of this review that some indications of cell therapies were not appropriate, they might be reasons why their neurorestorative effects could not be proved by multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Theoretically if one kind of cell therapy has neurorestorative effects according to its cellular bio-proprieties, it should have appropriate indications. The cell therapies with special bio-properties is promising if the indication selections are appropriate, such as olfactory ensheathing cells for chronic ischemic stroke, and their neurorestorative effects can be confirmed by higher level clinical trials of evidence-based medicine.

Why is olfactory neuroepithelium?

Currently, most cellular therapeutic effects for nervous diseases cannot be proven in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-control clinical trials, except for a few kinds of cells such as olfactory ensheathing cells. These cells show significant improvements in functional recovery and quality of life for patients with chronic ischemic stroke. Also, olfactory neuron transplantation has promising neurorestorative effects on patients with vascular dementia. Human olfactory neuroepithelium can spontaneously and sustainably regenerate or produce new olfactory neurons and glial cell types for decades or a lifetime. The neurorestorative mechanisms of olfactory ensheathing cells are well known; however, little is known about the neurorestorative mechanisms of olfactory neurons. Therefore, I hypothesize that the neurorestorative mechanisms of olfactory neurons after transplantation: (1) can well migrate where they are needed and become local functional neurons, as they need to compensate or replace; (2) must be regulated by some special molecular factors to elongate their axons, modulate or direct synapses to correctly recognize and connect the target cells, and integrate functions. Based on olfactory neuroepithelium cells displaying the special characterization, neurorestorative mechanisms, clinical therapeutic achievements, and hypotheses of effective mechanisms, they (olfactory ensheathing cells and olfactory neurons) may be the most efficient instruments of neurorestoration.

Quality Standards of Stem Cell Sources for Clinical Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases

A large number of experimental and clinical studies have shown that cell transplantation has therapeutic effects for PD, AD and other neurodegenerative diseases or damages. Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) guidance must be defined to produce clinical-grade cells for transplantation to the patients. Standardized quality and clinical preparation procedures of the transplanted cells will ensure the therapeutic efficacy and reduce the side-effect risk of cell therapy. Here we review the cell quality standards governing the clinical transplantation of stem cells for neurodegenerative diseases to clinical practitioners. These quality standards include cell quality control, minimal suggested cell doses for undergoing cell transplantation, documentation of procedure and therapy, safety evaluation, efficacy evaluation, policy of repeated treatments, not charging the patients for unproven therapies, basic principles of cell therapy, and publishing responsibility.

Standards of clinical-grade olfactory ensheathing cell culture and quality control (2020 China Version)

Currently, there are many different standards for the quality control of olfactory ensheathing cell (OEC) culture prepared from human olfactory bulb and mucosa. It is challenging to compare the clinical results of OEC treatment from different hospitals. Based on various standards, the Chinese Association of Neurorestoratology (CANR; Preparatory) and China Committee of International Association of Neurorestoratology (IANR-China Committee) organized professional experts in this field to evaluate the data and develop a standard for clinical applications, including donor evaluation, sample collection, cell culture, cell testing, packaging labels, storage, transportation, and quality control of intermediate/finished cell products, as well as training and management procedures for laboratory operators, the use and management of materials and equipment, and routine maintenance of a clean environment. These standards apply to the quality and control of OEC culture using human olfactory bulb and mucosa as the sample source for the member units of the CANR (Preparatory) and IANR-China Committee. It serves as a reference for physicians around the world who perform OEC clinical applications. This standard represents the minimum required standards for quality control when performing clinical-grade OEC cultures in clinical neurorestorative treatments.

Clinical neurorestorative cell therapies: Developmental process, current state and future prospective

Clinical cell therapies (CTs) for neurological diseases and cellular damage have been explored for more than 2 decades. According to the United States Food and Drug Administration, there are 2 types of cell categories for therapy, namely stem cell-derived CT products and mature/functionally differentiated cell-derived CT products. However, regardless of the type of CT used, the majority of reports of clinical CTs from either small sample sizes based on single-center phase 1 or 2 unblinded trials or retrospective clinical studies showed effects on neurological improvement and the ability to either partially or temporarily thwart the deteriorating cellular processes of the neurodegenerative diseases. There have been only a few prospective, multicenter, randomized, double- blind placebo-control clinical trials of CTs so far in this developing novel area that have shown negative results, and more clinical trials are needed. This will expand our knowledge in exploring the type of cells that yield promising results and restore damaged neurological structure and functions of the central nervous system based on higher level evidence-based medical data. In this review, we briefly introduce the developmental process, current state, and future prospective for clinical neurorestorative CT.

Clinical Cell Therapy Guidelines for Neurorestoration (IANR/CANR 2017)

Cell therapy has been shown to be a key clinical therapeutic option for central nervous system diseases or damage. Standardization of clinical cell therapy procedures is an important task for professional associations devoted to cell therapy. The Chinese Branch of the International Association of Neurorestoratology (IANR) completed the first set of guidelines governing the clinical application of neurorestoration in 2011. The IANR and the Chinese Association of Neurorestoratology (CANR) collaborated to propose the current version "Clinical Cell Therapy Guidelines for Neurorestoration (IANR/CANR 2017)". The IANR council board members and CANR committee members approved this proposal on September 1, 2016, and recommend it to clinical practitioners of cellular therapy. These guidelines include items of cell type nomenclature, cell quality control, minimal suggested cell doses, patient-informed consent, indications for undergoing cell therapy, contraindications for undergoing cell therapy, documentation of procedure and therapy, safety evaluation, efficacy evaluation, policy of repeated treatments, do not charge patients for unproven therapies, basic principles of cell therapy, and publishing responsibility.

Neurorestorative effect of olfactory ensheathing cells and Schwann cells by intranasal delivery for patients with ischemic stroke: design of a multicenter randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled clinical study

Introduction:

There have been many clinical studies or trials for patients with ischemic stroke by cell therapy, which includes olfactory ensheathing cell (OEC), mononuclear cell, mesenchymal stromal cell, fetal neural cell or products of varying stem cells, etc. Those cells through different transplanting ways have showed moderate neurorestorative effect in patients with ischemic stroke, but majority were not multicenter randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled studies or trials. OEC transplantation has shown a more effective to restore neurological damage in central nervous system (CNS). We hypothesize that OEC through intra-olfactory mucosa transplantation can migrate into the ischemic stroke area around and restore neurological deficit caused from this disaster.

Objective of the study:

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo- controlled 12 month clinical study of OECs and Schwann cells (SCs) for patients with sub-acute ischemic stroke and chronic ischemic stroke, to test which kind of cell has more neurorestorative effect for patients with ischemic stroke relative to placebo.

Design of the study:

This study is involved two groups of patients with sub-acute ischemic stroke and chronic ischemic stroke. Each group enrolls 30 patients. The experimental intervention consists in using OECs and SCs through intra-olfactory mucosa transplantation in participating patients. This will be compared with using placebo (injecting cell culture medium). Participating patients in groups of sub-acute ischemic stroke and chronic ischemic stroke are randomized in natural order to divide into A, B, or C groups and get one of experimental treatment procedures. Patients, operating physicians, and assessing physicians are left unaware of what cells or medium will be injected to participating patients. All patients will be assessed before treatment and after one month, three months, six months, and one year.

Ethics and dissemination:

The clinical study protocol and consent form were approved by Chinese Association of Neurorestoratology and the ethics committees of the hospitals which joined this clinical study. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

Common olfactory ensheathing glial markers in the developing human olfactory system

The in situ immunocytochemical properties of olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) have been well studied in several small to medium sized animal models including rats, mice, guinea pigs, cats and canines. However, we know very little about the antigenic characteristics of OECs in situ within the adult and developing human olfactory bulb and nerve roots. To address this gap in knowledge we undertook an immunocytochemical analysis of the 11–19 pcw human foetal olfactory system. Human foetal OECs in situ possessed important differences compared to rodents in the expression of key surface markers. P75^NTR was not observed in OECs but was strongly expressed by human foetal Schwann cells and perineurial olfactory nerve fibroblasts surrounding OECs. We define OECs throughout the 11–19 pcw human olfactory system as S100/vimentin/SOX10+ with low expression of GFAP. Our results suggest that P75^NTR is a robust marker that could be utilised with cell sorting techniques to generate enriched OEC cultures by first removing P75^NTR expressing Schwann cells and fibroblasts, and subsequently to isolate OECs after P75^NTR upregulation in vitro. O4 and PSA-NCAM were not found to be suitable surface antigens for OEC purification owing to their ambiguous and heterogeneous expression. Our results highlight the importance of corroborating cell markers when translating cell therapies from animal models to the clinic.

The pluralization of the international: Resistance and alter-standardization in regenerative stem cell medicine

The article explores the formation of an international politics of resistance and 'alterstandardization' in regenerative stem cell medicine. The absence of internationally harmonized regulatory frameworks in the clinical stem cell field and the presence of lucrative business opportunities have resulted in the formation of transnational networks adopting alternative research standards and practices. These oppose, as a universal global standard, strict evidence-based medicine clinical research protocols as defined by scientists and regulatory agencies in highly developed countries. The emergence of transnational spaces of alter-standardization is closely linked to scientific advances in rapidly developing countries such as China and India, but calls for more flexible regulatory frameworks, and the legitimization of experimental for-profit applications outside of evidence-based medical care, are emerging increasingly also within more stringently regulated countries, such as the United States and countries in the European Union. We can observe, then, a trend toward the pluralization of the standards, practices, and concepts in the stem cell field.

A prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial using a combination of olfactory ensheathing cells and Schwann cells for the treatment of chronic complete spinal cord injuries

The aim of this prospective randomized double-blind clinical study is to examine the benefits of using olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) combined with or without Schwann cells (SCs) in treating chronic complete spinal cord injuries (SCIs). This would offer patients a better alternative for neurological functional recovery. According to the initial design, 28 eligible participants with cervical chronic complete SCI were recruited and randomly allocated into four groups of seven participants each. The neurological assessments were to be performed according to the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) and International Association of Neurorestoratology (IANR) Functional Rating Scales, in combination with electrophysiological tests, for example, electromyography (EMG) and paraspinal somatosensory evoked potentials (PSSEPs). Here we have summarized the data from seven patients; three patients received an OEC intraspinal transplantation, one underwent SC implantation, and one received a combination of OECs and SCs. The remaining two patients were used as controls. The scores were evaluated independently by at least two neurologists in a blinded fashion for comparing the neurological functional changes during pre- and post-cell transplantation (6-month follow-up). All patients who received OECs, SCs alone, and a combination of them showed functional improvement. Mild fever occurred in one of the patients with OEC transplant that subsided after symptomatic treatments. All treated patients except one showed improvement in the electrophysiological tests. The functional improvement rate comprises 5/5 (100%) in the treated group, but 0/2 (0%) in the control group (p = 0.008). These preliminary findings show that transplanting OECs, SCs, or a combination of them is well tolerated and that they have beneficial effects in patients. Thus, further studies in larger patient cohorts are warranted to assess the benefits and risks of these intervention strategies. This manuscript is published as part of the IANR special issue of Cell Transplantation.