1
|
Gebel C, Kruschel I, Bodinger S, Simon ST, Eichenauer DA, Pralong A, Wedding U. Palliative care for patients with hematologic malignancies in Germany: a nationwide survey on everyday practice and influencing factors from the perspective of treating physicians. Ann Hematol 2024; 103:1753-1763. [PMID: 38538976 PMCID: PMC11009764 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-024-05726-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
Integrating palliative care into the treatment of patients with advanced hematological malignancies (HM) remains challenging. To explore treating physicians' perspectives on current palliative care practice and to evaluate factors influencing integration, we conducted a nationwide online survey. Based on literature and expert review, the survey addressed the importance of palliative care, communication about life-threatening conditions, challenges in establishing goals of care, and factors influencing the integration of palliative care. 207 physicians treating patients with HM in Germany participated. We used standard descriptive statistics to analyze quantitative data and a content structuring approach. Most physicians considered palliative care in HM to be very important (60.6%) and discussed life-threatening conditions with more than half of their patients (52%), especially when goals of care were changed (87.0%) or when patients raised the topic (84.0%). Disease-related factors, different professional perspectives on prognosis, and patient hopes were the main barriers to changing goals of care, but collaboration with colleagues and multidisciplinary teams provided important support. Time constraints were identified as the main barrier to integrating palliative care. The majority worked well with palliative care teams. Referral processes and conditions were perceived as minor barriers. The study highlights the need to address barriers to integrating palliative care into the management of patients with advanced HM. Future research should aim at optimizing palliative care for patients with HM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cordula Gebel
- Department of Palliative Care, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Cologne, Germany.
| | - Isabel Kruschel
- Department of Palliative Care, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Cologne, Germany
| | - Steffi Bodinger
- Department of Palliative Care, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Cologne, Germany
| | - Steffen T Simon
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Cologne University Hospital, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Dusseldorf Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dennis A Eichenauer
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Dusseldorf Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anne Pralong
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Cologne University Hospital, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Dusseldorf Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ulrich Wedding
- Department of Palliative Care, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gebel C, Basten J, Kruschel I, Ernst T, Wedding U. Knowledge, feelings, and willingness to use palliative care in cancer patients with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors: a prospective, cross-sectional study in a comprehensive cancer center in Germany. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:445. [PMID: 37410174 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07914-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) receive palliative care (PC) less often and later than patients with solid tumors (ST). Patients' lack of knowledge about PC and negative feelings about PC are barriers to their willingness to use PC. Is there a difference between patients with HM and ST in their knowledge and willingness to use PC? METHODS Two hundred ten patients (85 HM, 125 ST) from an oncology day clinic at a university hospital participated in this cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey. RESULTS Patients with HM and ST had high knowledge and mainly positive feelings about PC. More than half of the patients answered that they would feel reassured by the use of PC, and one-third would feel anxious or hopeless. The majority of patients (58.3%) were willing to use PC. There are no significant differences between patients with HM and ST. In multiple regression analysis, perceived chance of cure and feelings of reassurance and anxiety are associated with willingness to use PC, but not with the HM/ST disease group. More than half (53.9%) of the participants would like the treating physician to choose the timing of a discussion about PC. CONCLUSION Our study shows a high level of knowledge and relatively positive feelings of patients about PC, with no differences between patients with HM or ST. They expect their treating physician to initiate communication about PC. Communication should include the patient's feelings about PC and their chances of a cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cordula Gebel
- Department of Palliative Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
| | - Judith Basten
- Department of Palliative Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Isabel Kruschel
- Department of Palliative Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Thomas Ernst
- University Tumor Center, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Ulrich Wedding
- Department of Palliative Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brown CE, Steiner JM, Leary PJ, Curtis JR, Engelberg RA. A World of Maximalist Medicine: Physician Perspectives on Palliative Care and End-of-life for Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. J Pain Symptom Manage 2023; 65:e329-e335. [PMID: 36521765 PMCID: PMC10023342 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Physicians who specialize in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) care for patients facing a serious, life-limiting illness. Palliative care is underutilized in patients with PAH, and little is known about how best to provide palliative care to this patient population. OBJECTIVES Using a qualitative approach, assess physicians' perspectives on barriers and facilitators to the use of palliative care in PAH. METHODS Participants were board-certified pulmonologists and cardiologists recruited from the Pulmonary Hypertension Association's list of physician specialists and academic center websites. We performed one-on-one semi-structured interviews that were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Twelve physicians participated in the study, with a median age of 48.5 years and 20.5 years of clinical experience caring for patients with PAH. We identified the following themes and associated barriers and facilitators to effective implementation of palliative care for patients with PAH: a tailored approach to the individual patient; a PAH-specialist-led culture of care; effective collaboration with palliative care clinicians; and limitations imposed by health systems. CONCLUSION PAH physicians are open to palliative care for their patients and are willing to partner with palliative care clinicians to implement this effectively and in the right setting. Areas for targeted improvement in enhancing palliative care for patients with PAH exist, especially enhancing collaboration between PAH physicians and palliative care specialists and navigating barriers in health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Crystal E Brown
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine (C.E.B., J.M.S., P.J.L., J.R.C., R.A.E.), University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine (C.E.B., J.M.S., J.R.C., R.A.E.), Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Bioethics and Humanities (C.E.B.), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Jill M Steiner
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine (C.E.B., J.M.S., J.R.C., R.A.E.), Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Cardiology (C.E.B., J.M.S., P.J.L., J.R.C., R.A.E.), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Peter J Leary
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine (C.E.B., J.M.S., P.J.L., J.R.C., R.A.E.), University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Epidemiology (P.J.L.), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - J Randall Curtis
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine (C.E.B., J.M.S., P.J.L., J.R.C., R.A.E.), University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine (C.E.B., J.M.S., J.R.C., R.A.E.), Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ruth A Engelberg
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine (C.E.B., J.M.S., P.J.L., J.R.C., R.A.E.), University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine (C.E.B., J.M.S., J.R.C., R.A.E.), Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tanzi S, Martucci G. Doing palliative care research on hematologic cancer patients: A realist synthesis of literature and experts’ opinion on what works, for whom and in what circumstances. Front Oncol 2023; 13:991791. [PMID: 37051541 PMCID: PMC10083487 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.991791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundResearch in PC (Palliative Care) is frequently challenging for patient’s frailty, study design, professional misconceptions, and so on. Little is known about specificity in PC research on Hematologic cancer patients, who have distinct characteristics that might influence the enrollment process.AimsWhat works, how and for whom, in increasing enrollment in studies in PC on patients with hematologic malignancies?MethodsRealist review: a qualitative review whose goal is to identify and explain the interaction between Contexts, Mechanisms, and Outcomes (CMOs). The theory was informed by a narrative, theory-based literature research, including an initialsystematic research, and the addition of papers suggested by experts of the field. We also used 7 interviews with experts in PC about patients with hematologic malignancies research and our own experience from a PC pilot study on patients with hematologic malignancies to refine the initial theory.ResultsIn our initial theory we hypothesize that: - Access to palliative care could be beneficial to hematologic patients, even in early stages - Hematologists tend to under-use palliative care services in general, due to unpredictable disease trajectories and cultural barriers. - These factors may negatively impact the patients’ enrollment in PC researchWe included secondary literature as narrative reviews, if they presented interesting propositions useful for our theoretical construction. 23 papers met our inclusion criteria.We also searched for relevant CMOs impacting referral in palliative care, and we selected a list of CMOs that could be relevant also in hematology. We accordingly theorized a group of interventions that could increase the enrollment in PC research and presented them using “social exchange theory” (SET) as a theoretical framework.Prominent researchers in PC in hematologic malignancies were interviewed on their opinion on our results, and additional CMOs.ConclusionsBefore conducting research in PC on patients with hematologic malignancies, it’s probably advisable to assess: - The perception of the different actors (physicians, nurses, other professionals involved), in particular the hematologists, in terms of pros and cons of referral to PC and enrollment in PC trials - The existing relationship between PC and the Hematology departmentAccordingly, it’s possible to tailor different interventions on the various actors and choose a model of trial to increase the perception of benefits from PC and, consequently, enrollment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Tanzi
- Palliative Care Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Martucci
- Palliative Care Local Program, Local Health Unit of Modena, Modena, Italy
- *Correspondence: Gianfranco Martucci,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shaulov A, Aviv A, Alcalde J, Zimmermann C. Early integration of palliative care for patients with haematological malignancies. Br J Haematol 2022; 199:14-30. [PMID: 35670630 PMCID: PMC9796711 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Revised: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Early palliative care (EPC) significantly improves quality of life, symptoms, and satisfaction with care for patients with advanced cancer. International organizations have recognized and promoted the role of palliative care as a distinct specialty, advocating its involvement throughout the cancer trajectory. Although patients with haematologic malignancies (HMs) have a comparable symptom burden to patients with solid tumours, they face multiple barriers to EPC integration. In this review, we discuss these barriers, present updated evidence from clinical trials of EPC in HMs and propose models to support EPC integration into care for patients with HMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adir Shaulov
- Department of HaematologyHadassah Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael,Faculty of MedicineHebrew University of JerusalemIsrael
| | - Ariel Aviv
- Department of HaematologyHaEmek Medical CenterAfulaIsrael
| | - Jacqueline Alcalde
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkTorontoOntarioCanada,Department of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Camilla Zimmermann
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkTorontoOntarioCanada,Department of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada,Department of PsychiatryUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Miyasaki JM, Lim SY, Chaudhuri KR, Antonini A, Piemonte M, Richfield E, Alburquerque Gonzalez D, Lorenzl S, Walker R, Bhidayasiri R, Bouca R, McConvey V. Access and Attitudes Toward Palliative Care Among Movement Disorders Clinicians. Mov Disord 2021; 37:182-189. [PMID: 34431560 DOI: 10.1002/mds.28773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuropalliative care is an emerging field for those with neurodegenerative illnesses, but access to neuropalliative care remains limited. OBJECTIVE We sought to determine Movement Disorder Society (MDS) members' attitudes and access to palliative care. METHODS A quantitative and qualitative survey instrument was developed by the MDS Palliative Care Task Force and e-mailed to all members for completion. Descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis were triangulated. RESULTS Of 6442 members contacted, 652 completed the survey. Completed surveys indicating country of the respondent overwhelmingly represented middle- and high-income countries. Government-funded homecare was available to 54% of respondents based on patient need, 25% limited access, and 21% during hospitalization or an acute defined event. Eighty-nine percent worked in multidisciplinary teams. The majority endorsed trigger-based referrals to palliative care (75.5%), while 24.5% indicated any time after diagnosis was appropriate. Although 66% referred patients to palliative care, 34% did not refer patients. Barriers were identified by 68% of respondents, the most significant being available workforce, financial support for palliative care, and perceived knowledge of palliative care physicians specific to movement disorders. Of 499 respondents indicating their training in palliative care or desire to learn these skills, 55% indicated a desire to gain more skills. CONCLUSIONS The majority of MDS member respondents endorsed a role for palliative care in movement disorders. Many members have palliative training or collaborate with palliative care physicians. Although significant barriers exist to access palliative care, the desire to gain more skills and education on palliative care is an opportunity for professional development within the MDS. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janis M Miyasaki
- Parkinson and Movement Disorders Program, Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Shen-Yang Lim
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, and the Mah Pooi Soo & Tan Chin Nam Centre for Parkinson's & Related Disorders, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - K Ray Chaudhuri
- Parkinson Foundation International Centre of Excellence, Kings College Hospital and Kings College, Denmark Hill Campus, London, United Kingdom
| | - Angelo Antonini
- Movement Disorders Unit-Center for Rare Neurological Diseases, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Maria Piemonte
- Physical Therapy, Speech Therapy, and Occupational Therapy Department, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Daniela Alburquerque Gonzalez
- Centro de Trastornos del Movimiento, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Stefan Lorenzl
- Institute of Nursing Science and Practice, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.,Ludwig-Maximillians-University, Munich, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Kliniku Agatharied, Hausham, Germany
| | - Richard Walker
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Roongroj Bhidayasiri
- Chulalongkorn Centre of Excellence for Parkinson's Disease and Related Disorders, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.,The Academy of Science, The Royal Society of Thailand, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Raquel Bouca
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular Joao Lobo Antunes, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Oncology Clinicians' Challenges to Providing Palliative Cancer Care-A Theoretical Domains Framework, Pan-Cancer System Survey. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:1483-1494. [PMID: 33918837 PMCID: PMC8167753 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28020140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Despite the known benefits, healthcare systems struggle to provide early, integrated palliative care (PC) for advanced cancer patients. Understanding the barriers to providing PC from the perspective of oncology clinicians is an important first step in improving care. A 33-item online survey was emailed to all oncology clinicians working with all cancer types in Alberta, Canada, from November 2017 to January 2018. Questions were informed by Michie's Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) and queried (a) PC provision in oncology clinics, (b) specialist PC consultation referrals, and (c) working with PC consultants and home care. Respondents (n = 263) were nurses (41%), physicians (25%), and allied healthcare professionals (18%). Barriers most frequently identified were "clinicians' limited time/competing priorities" (64%), "patients' negative perceptions of PC" (63%), and clinicians' capability to manage patients' social issues (63%). These factors mapped to all three BCW domains: motivation, opportunity, and capability. In contrast, the least frequently identified barriers were clinician motivation and perceived PC benefits. Oncology clinicians' perceptions of barriers to early PC were comparable across tumour types and specialties but varied by professional role. The main challenges to early integrated PC include all three BCW domains. Notably, motivation is not a barrier for oncology clinicians; however, opportunity and capability barriers were identified. Multifaceted interventions using these findings have been developed, such as tip sheets to enhance capability, reframing PC with patients, and earlier specialist PC nursing access, to enhance clinicians' use of and patients' benefits from an early PC approach.
Collapse
|