Clinical outcomes in elderly patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis: a retrospective study from a single center in china

Risk factors of different mortality periods in older patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing urgent-start peritoneal dialysis: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

The first six months of therapy represents a high-risk period for peritoneal dialysis (PD) failure. The risk of death in the first six months is higher for older patients treated with urgent-start PD (USPD). However, there are still gaps in research on mortality and risk factors for death in this particular group of patients. We aimed to investigate mortality rates and risk factors for death in older patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving USPD within and after six months of therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the clinical information of older adults aged ≥ 65 years with ESRD who received USPD between 2013 and 2019 in five Chinese hospitals. Patients were followed up to June 30, 2020. The mortality and risk factors for death in the first six months of USPD treatment and beyond were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 379 elderly patients in the study, 130 died over the study period. During the follow-up period, the highest number (45, 34.6%) of deaths occurred within the first six months. Cardiovascular disease was the most common cause of death. The baseline New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV cardiac function [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.457, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.200-5.030, p = 0.014] and higher white blood cell (WBC) count (HR = 1.082, 95% CI: 1.021-1.147, p = 0.008) increased the mortality risk within six months of USPD. The baseline NYHA class III-IV cardiac function (HR = 1.945, 95% CI: 1.149-3.294, p = 0.013), lower WBC count (HR = 0.917, 95% CI: 0.845-0.996, p = 0.040), lower potassium levels (HR = 0.584, 95% CI: 0.429-0.796, p = 0.001), and higher calcium levels (HR = 2.160, 95% CI: 1.025-4.554, p = 0.043) increased the mortality risk after six months of USPD.

CONCLUSION

Different risk factors correlated with mortality in older adults with ESRD within and after six months of undergoing USPD, including baseline NYHA class III-IV cardiac function, WBC count, potassium, and calcium levels.

Comparison of young and old patients on peritoneal dialysis: A retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

With a global increase in life expectancy around the world, the burden of chronic kidney disease in the elderly is increasing. The number of elderly patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) is also increasing. There is still a perception that PD may be associated with an increased risk of complications in these elderly patients.

METHODS

A total of 311 patients, of which 103 PD patients aged 65 and over and 208 PD patients under 65 years of age, were followed in a single center and evaluated, retrospectively. Demographic data of these patients, albumin values at first PD and during PD time, residual urine amount, number of peritonitis, time to the first peritonitis attack, PD endpoints, and mortality were compared.

RESULTS

Peritonitis and technique failure rates were lower in patients aged 65 and over who applied PD (0.61-0.75, 6.8%-23.1%, respectively). There was no difference in peritonitis-free survival (p = 0.931). Need for help HR 2.569 [95%CI 1.564-4.219] (p < 0.05), time to first peritonitis attack HR 0.983 [95%CI 0.974-0.992] (p < 0.05), mean albumin value HR 0.191 [95%CI 0.088-0.413] (p < 0.05), urine output level HR 1.154 [95%CI 1.010-1.318] (p < 0.05) were factors affecting mortality.

CONCLUSION

Peritonitis and technical survival evaluations of elderly PD patients, other than mortality, were lower than younger PD patients. However, the need for help is one of the biggest obstacles to this method for the elderly. We believe that incentives in this regard will increase the number of elderly PD patients.

Outcomes of elderly peritoneal dialysis patients: 65-74 years old versus ≥ 75 years old

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the clinical data of elderly patients with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and compare patient and technique survival rates between Group 1 (65-74 years old) and Group 2 (≥75 years old).

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 296 elderly patients (≥65 years old) on maintenance PD who were admitted to the Peritoneal Dialysis Center of the Second Hospital of Soochow University. The patients were categorized by outcome into ongoing PD, changed to hemodialysis, renal recovery dialysis stopped, or death groups. The patients were divided into Group 1 (65-74 years old) and Group 2 (≥75 years old). Patient survival and technique survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors associated with patient survival were analyzed using the Cox regression model.

RESULTS

There were 176 (59.5%) subjects in Group 1 and 120 (40.5%) subjects in Group 2. The primary causes of death were cardiovascular events, peritonitis, and other infections. The patient survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 91.2%, 68.0%, and 51.3% in Group 1 and 76.8%, 37.5%, and 17.6% in Group 2 (p < 0.001, HR 0.387, 95% CI 0.282-0.530). There was no statistically significant difference in the technique survival rate between the two groups (p = 0.54).

CONCLUSION

The elderly PD patients in this cohort mostly died from cardiovascular events, with a higher patient survival rate in Group 1 and similar technique survival in both groups. Older age, lower prealbumin, higher creatinine, not being on activated vitamin D, and high Charlson's comorbidity index (CCI) score were independent risk factors for death.

Survival Rates in Elderly Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

Purpose

The present study aimed at evaluating the survival rate, its associated factors, and the causes of death in elderly patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) in Vietnam.

Patients and Methods

This is a retrospective, observational study conducted among patients aged ≥65 years who underwent CAPD at Thong Nhat Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, from April 2012 to December 2020. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the cumulative survival rate, and the Log rank test was used to analyze the factors associated with the survival rate of patients.

Results

This study enrolled a total of 68 patients with a mean age of 71.93 ± 7.44 years at the initiation of CAPD. The most common complication among kidney failure patients was diabetic nephropathy (39.71%). The rate of concomitant cardiovascular diseases was 58.82%. The average survival rate was 45.59 ± 4.01 months. Peritonitis was the most common factor causing death (31.25%), followed by cardiovascular diseases (28.12%) and malnutrition (25%). The factors that impacted the survival rate included concomitant cardiovascular diseases, low serum albumin (<35 g/dL), and an indication of CAPD due to exhausted vascular access for hemodialysis at baseline. The main factor associated with a shorter survival time was concomitant cardiovascular diseases.

Conclusion

It is necessary to improve the survival time beyond 5 years for elderly patients undergoing CAPD, especially for those with concomitant cardiovascular diseases. Besides the prevention of peritonitis, adequate measures to protect from cardiovascular diseases and malnutrition will reduce the mortality rate in patients on CAPD.

Use of the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) as a novel prognostic marker for patients on peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND

The systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), a novel inflammation maker, has proven to be associated with prognostic outcomes in various diseases. However, few studies have been conducted assessing how SIRI may influence outcomes of patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD). Herein, we assessed the predictive value of SIRI on mortality all-cause mortality, including cardiovascular disease (CVD) in PD patients.

METHODS

A total of 646 PD patients were enrolled in this study. PD patients received regular PD treatments at the Zhujiang Hospital from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2018. SIRI values could be computed as follows: neutrophil count × monocyte count/lymphocyte count. Patients were divided into two groups according to the median level of SIRI. Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier methods were applied to analyze the relationship between SIRI and mortality outcomes in PD patients.

RESULTS

During the median 31-month follow-up period, 97 (15.0%) PD patients died from all-causes, and 47 (49.0%) died of CVD. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed that a high SIRI corresponded to the high mortality of all-cause deaths, including CVD (both p < 0.001) in patients on PD. After adjusting for potential confounders, the higher SIRI level was significantly associated with an increased all-cause mortality (HR: 2.007, 95% CI: 1.304-3.088, p = 0.002) and cardiovascular mortality (HR: 2.847, 95% CI: 1.445-5.608, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

SIRI was a promising predictor of mortality in PD patients, with a higher SIRI corresponding to increased risk of mortality.

Serum uric acid level and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies

BACKGROUND

The association between serum uric acid (SUA) and all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients is controversial. Therefore, we aimed to determine the relationship between SUA and all-cause and CVD mortality in PD patients.

METHOD

Web of Science, EMBASE, PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases were searched from their inception to 7 April 2021. Effect estimates were presented as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and pooled using random effects model.

RESULT

Thirteen cohort studies with 22418 patients were included in this systematic review, of which 9 were included in the meta-analysis. Before switching the reference group, pooled result for the highest SUA category was significantly greater than the median for all-cause mortality (HR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.37-4.26). After switching the reference group, the highest SUA category did not demonstrate an increased all-cause (HR = 1.40, 95% CI: 0.95-2.05) or CVD (HR = 1.30, 95% CI: 0.72-2.34) mortality compared with the lowest SUA category. Dose-response analysis suggested a nonlinear association between SUA and all-cause mortality risk (Pnonlinearity = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis didn't find the relationship between SUA levels and all-cause and CVD mortality risk in PD patients. More rigorously designed studies are warranted in the future.

Outcomes of peritoneal dialysis in elderly vs non-elderly patients: A systemic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Several studies have compared outcomes of peritoneal dialysis (PD) between elderly and non-elderly patients but with variable results. We hereby designed this review to compare mortality, peritonitis, and technique survival between elderly and non-elderly patients on PD.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched for studies comparing outcomes of PD between elderly and non-elderly patients. The last search date was 14th July 2021.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included. 12 studies defined the elderly as ≥65 years of age and these were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis of crude (RR: 2.45 95% CI: 1.36, 4.40 I2 = 97% p = 0.003) and adjusted data (HR: 2.80 95% CI: 2.45, 3.09 I2 = 0% p<0.00001) indicated a statistically significant increased risk of mortality amongst elderly patients as compared to non-elderly patients. Meta-analysis of four studies demonstrated a statistically significant increased risk of peritonitis in the elderly (RR: 1.56 95% CI: 1.18, 2.07 I2 = 76% p = 0.002). Pooled analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in technique survival between the two groups (RR: 0.95 95% CI: 0.86, 1.05 I2 = 86% p = 0.32).

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients on PD have a significantly increased risk of mortality as compared to non-elderly patients. The risk of peritonitis is also significantly increased in older adults but the increased age has no impact on technique survival. Further studies are needed to strengthen our conclusions.

Is peritoneal dialysis suitable technique CKD patients over 65 years? A prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing in patients older than 65 years and is related to morbidity, frailty, and dependence. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has classically been associated with young patients with an active life.

HYPOTHESIS

PD should be offered to patients over 65 years. We search for any unfavorable results that may advice not to recommend PD therapy for this group.

OBJECTIVE

To describe PD treatment and outcomes in patients > 65 years, to compare their results with patients < 65 years and to identify areas with room for improvement in a real-life study.

STUDY

Prospective, observational, and multicenter study performed in incident PD patients, from January 2003 until January 2018.

RESULTS

We included 2,435 PD patients, 31.9% were older than 65 years; there was a difference of 25 years between both groups. Median follow up was 2.1 years. Older than 65 years group had more comorbidity: Diabetes (29.5% vs 17.2%; p < 0.001), previous CV events 34.5% vs 14.0%; p < 0.001), Charlson index (3.8 vs 3.0; p < 0.001). We did not find differences in efficacy and PD adequacy objectives fulfillment, anaemia management or blood pressure during follow-up. Peritonitis rate was higher in older 65 years group (0.65 vs 0.45 episodes/patient/year; p < 0.001), but there was not differences in germs, admission rate and follow up. Mortality was higher in older 65 years group (28.4% vs 9.4%) as expected. PD permanence probability was similar (2.1 years). The main cause of PD withdrawal was transplant in group < 65 years (48.3%) and transfer to HD in group > 65 years. The main reason was caregiver or patient fatigue (20.2%), and not technique failure (7.3%). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed a relation (HR [95%CI]) between mortality and age > 65 years 2.4 [1.9-3.0]; DM 1.6 [1.3-2.1]; CV events 2.1 [1.7-2.7]. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identify a relation between technique failure and age > 65 years 1.5 [1.3-1.9]; DM 1.6 [1.3-1.9] and previous transplant 1.5 [1.2-2.0].

CONCLUSION

Patients older than 65 years fulfilled PD adequacy criteria during the follow up. We believe PD is a valid option for patients older 65 years. It is necessary to try to prevent infections and patient/caregiver fatigue, to avoid HD transfer for reasons not related to technique failure.

Comparison of long-term outcomes between Chinese peritoneal dialysis patients with and without diabetes: A 10-year cohort study

AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients with and without diabetes in southern China.

METHODS

This retrospective and observational cohort study included all adult patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who received PD in our center from January 2009 to December 2017 and were followed until December 2019. Clinical outcomes were compared by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and cumulative incidence function, and risk factors were estimated using Cox regression analyses and competing risk models.

RESULTS

Of 401 patients receiving PD, 120 (29.9%) had type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and 281 (70.1%) did not have diabetes mellitus (NDM). Patients with DM were older and had more cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidities than patients without DM. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with DM had shorter survival (Log-rank 3.215, P < 0.0001) compared with patients without DM. Patients with DM had a lower death-censored technique survival (Log-rank 2.029, P = 0.0180), however, there was no significant difference in peritonitis-free period (Log rank 1.375, P = 0.1133). These results were reproduced after taking competing events into account. Both on multivariate Cox analysis and on multivariate competing risk regression, diabetes was an independent predictor for increased mortality and technique failure, but not for peritonitis-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing PD with DM had increased risk of mortality and technique failure, and closer monitoring and additional focus in patients with DM treated by PD are, therefore, warranted.

Incidence and risk factors of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis in elderly patients: A retrospective clinical study

BACKGROUND

This study was to analyze the incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of peritonitis in elderly continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients.

METHODS

Incident patients undergone CAPD from 1 January 2006 to 30 June 2015 in our center were enrolled and divided into aged < 65 years and ≥ 65 years groups. Risk factors were evaluated using a logistic regression model, and outcome comparison was evaluated using a Cox proportional model.

RESULTS

Among 1953 patients, 111(33.2%) in elderly (n = 334) and 470 (29.0%) in younger (n = 1619) developed at least one episode of peritonitis. Comparing with younger patients, elderly ones had a higher peritonitis rate (0.203 vs. 0.145 episodes/patient-year, p < 0.05). The multivariate Cox regression showed that advanced age (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.01-1.11, p = 0.015), assistant-assisted peritoneal dialysis (PD; HR = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.23-5.64, p = 0.012), higher body mass index (BMI; HR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.02-1.20, p = 0.010), and low serum albumin level (HR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.90-0.98, p = 0.004) were associated with increased peritonitis risk in elderly patients. Compared with younger ones with peritonitis, elderly patients had an approximately fourfold increased risk of peritonitis-related mortality (odd ratio (OR) = 3.57, 95% CI = 1.38-9.28, p = 0.009). During the cohort, peritonitis was the risk factor associated with technique failure (HR = 3.19, 95% CI = 2.33-4.39, p < 0.001) in younger patient but not in the elderly population (HR = 1.82, 95% CI = 0.84-3.94, p = 0.132).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly PD patients had higher prevalence for peritonitis and peritonitis-related mortality. Advanced age, assistant-assisted PD, a higher BMI, and lower serum albumin level were independently associated with the first episode of peritonitis in elderly patients. However, peritonitis was not the predictor of death-censored technique failure in elderly ones.

Is peritoneal dialysis suitable technique CKD patients over 65 years? A prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing in patients older than 65years and is related to morbidity, frailty, and dependence. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has classically been associated with young patients with an active life.

HYPOTHESIS

PD should be offered to patients over 65years. We search for any unfavorable results that may advice not to recommend PD therapy for this group.

OBJECTIVE

To describe PD treatment and outcomes in patients >65years, to compare their results with patients <65years and to identify areas with room for improvement in a real-life study.

STUDY

Prospective, observational, and multicenter study performed in incident PD patients, from January 2003 until January 2018.

RESULTS

We included 2,435 PD patients, 31.9% were older than 65years; there was a difference of 25years between both groups. Median follow up was 2.1years. Older than 65years group had more comorbidity: Diabetes (29.5% vs 17.2%; p<0.001), previous CV events 34.5% vs 14.0%; p<0.001), Charlson index (3.8 vs 3.0; p<0.001). We did not find differences in efficacy and PD adequacy objectives fulfillment, anaemia management or blood pressure during follow-up. Peritonitis rate was higher in older 65years group (0.65 vs 0.45 episodes/patient/year; p<0.001), but there was not differences in germs, admission rate and follow up. Mortality was higher in older 65years group (28.4% vs 9.4%) as expected. PD permanence probability was similar (2.1years). The main cause of PD withdrawal was transplant in group <65years (48.3%) and transfer to HD in group >65years. The main reason was caregiver or patient fatigue (20.2%), and not technique failure (7.3%). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed a relation (HR [95%CI]) between mortality and age>65years 2.4 [1.9-3.0]; DM 1.6 [1.3-2.1]; CV events 2.1 [1.7-2.7]. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identify a relation between technique failure and age>65years 1.5 [1.3-1.9]; DM 1.6 [1.3-1.9] and previous transplant 1.5 [1.2-2.0].

CONCLUSION

Patients older than 65years fulfilled PD adequacy criteria during the follow up. We believe PD is a valid option for patients older 65years. It is necessary to try to prevent infections and patient/caregiver fatigue, to avoid HD transfer for reasons not related to technique failure.

Early initiation of PD therapy in elderly patients is associated with increased risk of death

Background

The effect of early initiation of dialysis on outcomes of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remains controversial. We conducted this study to investigate the association between the timing of peritoneal dialysis (PD) initiation and mortality in different age groups.

Methods

In this single-centre cohort study, incident patients receiving PD from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2016 were enrolled. Patients were categorized into three groups according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at the initiation of PD, with early, mid and late initiation of PD defined as eGFR ≥7.5, 5–7.5 and <5 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively.

Results

A total of 2133 incident patients receiving PD were enrolled with a mean age of 47.1 years, 59.6% male and 25.3% with diabetes, of whom 1803 were young (age <65 years) and 330 were elderly (age ≥65 years). After multivariable adjustment, the overall and cardiovascular (CV) mortality risks for young patients receiving PD were not significantly different between these three groups. However, for elderly patients, early initiation of PD therapy was associated with increased risks of all-cause {hazard ratio [HR} 1.54 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06–2.25]} and CV [HR 2.07 (95% CI 1.24–3.48)] mortality compared with late initiation of PD, while no significant difference was observed in overall or CV mortality between the mid- and late-start groups.

Conclusions

No significant difference in mortality risk was found among the three levels of eGFR at PD therapy initiation in young patients, while early initiation of PD was associated with a higher risk of overall and CV mortality among elderly patients.

The Impact of CKD Anaemia on Patients: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Outcomes-A Systematic Literature Review

Anaemia is a common consequence of chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, the risk factors for its development and its impact on outcomes have not been well synthesised. Therefore, we undertook a systematic review to fully characterise the risk factors associated with the presence of anaemia in patients with CKD and a contemporary synthesis of the risks of adverse outcomes in patients with CKD and anaemia. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 2002 until 2018 for studies reporting the incidence or prevalence of anaemia and associated risk factors and/or associations between haemoglobin (Hb) or anaemia and mortality, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), hospitalisation, or CKD progression in adult patients with CKD. Extracted data were summarised as risk factors related to the incidence or prevalence of anaemia or the risk (hazard ratio (HR)) of outcome by Hb level (<10, 10-12, >12 g/dL) in patients not on dialysis and in those receiving dialysis. 191 studies met the predefined inclusion criteria. The risk factor most associated with the prevalence of anaemia was CKD stage, followed by age and sex. Mean HRs (95% CI) for all-cause mortality in patients with CKD on dialysis with Hb <10, 10-12, and >12 g/dL were 1.56 (1.43-1.71), 1.17 (1.09-1.26), and 0.91 (0.87-0.96), respectively. Similar patterns were observed for nondialysis patients and for the risks of hospitalisation, MACE, and CKD progression. This is the first known systematic review to quantify the risk of adverse clinical outcomes based on Hb level in patients with CKD. Anaemia was consistently associated with greater mortality, hospitalisation, MACE, and CKD progression in patients with CKD, and risk increased with anaemia severity. Effective treatments that not only treat the anaemia but also reduce the risk of adverse clinical outcomes are essential to help reduce the burden of anaemia and its management in CKD.

Clinical outcomes of incident peritoneal dialysis patients coming from kidney transplantation program: A case-control study

Introduction

Brazil ranks second in the absolute number of transplantations in the world. Despite improvements in graft survival, many patients will progress to graft loss and return to dialysis. Concerns exist regarding adverse clinical outcomes in this population when undergone peritoneal dialysis (PD).

Objective

To compare the occurrence of mortality, technique failure, and peritonitis among incident patients in PD coming from either Tx or pre-dialysis treatment.

Methodology

A retrospective study in which 47 adult patients with Tx failure (Tx group) were matched for age, gender, diabetes mellitus (DM), modality and start year of PD, with 1:1 predialysis patient (nTx group). The Fine-Gray competing risk model was used to analyze mortality and technique failure.

Results

Compared to nTx, the Tx group had a lower body mass index, serum potassium, and albumin concentrations. A higher ferritin level, transferrin saturation and the number of patients with positive serology for viral hepatitis were also observed in the Tx group. In the multivariate analysis, patients of the Tx group had 4.4-times higher risk of death (p = 0.007), with infection as the main cause. Technique failure and peritonitis were similar in both groups.

Conclusion

Previous Tx is a risk factor for mortality but not for technique failure or peritonitis in incident patients on a PD program.

Components of A Successful Peritoneal Dialysis Program

Although varying widely among different countries and geographic regions, the development of peritoneal dialysis invariably requires a well-established program. Key ingredients for the successful delivery of this therapy include adequate chronic kidney disease education, governmental or nongovernmental reimbursement, qualified physicians and nurses trained in the principles and practice of peritoneal dialysis, clinical management that incorporates an excellent and well-trained peritoneal dialysis team, a feasible and well-designed program for catheter insertion, a sound patient training and follow-up scheme, and continuous quality improvement. Some programs are enhanced by an active clinical research portfolio and other appropriate supportive systems. All of these factors are interlinked and inseparable from one another in ensuring a high-quality peritoneal dialysis program.

Changes in the worldwide epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis

As the global burden of chronic kidney disease continues to increase, so does the need for a cost-effective renal replacement therapy. In many countries, patient outcomes with peritoneal dialysis are comparable to or better than those with haemodialysis, and peritoneal dialysis is also more cost-effective. These benefits have not, however, always led to increased utilization of peritoneal dialysis. Use of this therapy is increasing in some countries, including China, the USA and Thailand, but has proportionally decreased in parts of Europe and in Japan. The variable trends in peritoneal dialysis use reflect the multiple challenges in prescribing this therapy to patients. Key strategies for facilitating peritoneal dialysis utilization include implementation of policies and incentives that favour this modality, enabling the appropriate production and supply of peritoneal dialysis fluid at a low cost, and appropriate training for nephrologists to enable increased utilization of the therapy and to ensure that rates of technique failure continue to decline. Further growth in peritoneal dialysis use is required to enable this modality to become an integral part of renal replacement therapy programmes worldwide.

Patient and Technique Survival of Older Adults with ESRD Treated with Peritoneal Dialysis

The number of older adults worldwide is increasing as societies gain success in improving the health and lifespan of their citizens. As a result, increasing numbers of older adults are presenting to the medical community with advanced kidney failure. Historically, dialysis treatments were withheld from older adults particularly those with severe co-existing illnesses. This has changed in most parts of the world, and there is now an increasing emphasis on shared decision-making to determine whether dialysis is appropriate and to determine which modality meets the needs, expectations, and desire of patients. Evidence examining the difference in risk for death of older adults treated with hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD), and the probability of those treated with PD to transfer to HD among older compared to younger adults, is largely derived from prospective cohort studies or analyses of data from national registries. In such studies, it is difficult to distinguish whether differences in outcomes reflect the effect of dialysis modality or differences in health status of different groups of patients. Longevity and technique survival are important, albeit not the only or most important consideration in such decision-making. Given the risk for bias in observational studies and the profound effect of dialysis modality on patients' lifestyle, the selection of dialysis modality should remain a decision made by the patient, caregivers, and his/her physician after thorough education and review of the available data.

Patient Survival and Technique Failure in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Patients with Prior Stroke

♦

BACKGROUND

To investigate patient survival and technical failure of patients with prior stroke receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) in Southern China. ♦

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. All subjects were recruited from the peritoneal dialysis center in The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2010. All eligible patients were assigned to stroke group and non-stroke group according to a history of stroke before receiving CAPD. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and death-censored technical failure. Cox regression was used to estimate risk factors of all-cause mortality and death-censored technique failure. ♦

RESULTS

Of the 1,068 recruited patients, 75 (7.0%) patients had a previous history of stroke. The all-cause mortality and death-censored technique failure were significantly higher in the stroke group compared with the non-stroke group, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 2.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.59 - 4.46 and OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.19 - 5.34). Older age (changed by 10 years, hazard ratio [HR] 1.90, 95% CI 1.07 - 3.38), lower body mass index (BMI 18.5 - 23.9 vs < 18.5 kg/m(2) reference, HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.05 - 0.55) and time to the first episode of peritonitis (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89 - 0.96) were independently associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality in patients with prior stroke. In addition, time to the first episode of peritonitis was associated with decreased risk of death-censored technique failure (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84 - 0.99) in those with prior stroke. ♦

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients with prior stroke had high rates of all-cause mortality and technique failure compared with those without prior stroke. Older age, lower BMI, and time to the first episode of peritonitis were independent risk factors of all-cause mortality in patients with prior stroke.

Causes for Withdrawal in an Urban Peritoneal Dialysis Program

Background. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an underutilized dialysis modality in the United States, especially in urban areas with diverse patient populations. Technique retention is a major concern of dialysis providers and might influence their approach to patients ready to begin dialysis therapy. Methods. Records from January 2009 to March 2014 were abstracted for demographic information, technique duration, and the reasons for withdrawal. Results. The median technique survival of the 128 incident patients during the study window was 781 days (2.1 years). The principle reasons for PD withdrawal were repeated peritonitis (30%); catheter dysfunction (18%); ultrafiltration failure (16%); patient choice or lack of support (16%); or hernia, leak, or other surgical complications (6%); and a total of 6 patients died during this period. Of the patients who did not expire and were not transplanted, most transferred to in-center hemodialysis and 8% transitioned to home-hemodialysis. Conclusions. Our findings suggest measures to ensure proper catheter placement and limiting infectious complications should be primary areas of focus in order to promote technique retention. Lastly, more focused education about home-hemodialysis as an option may allow those on PD who are beginning to demonstrate signs of technique failure to stay on home therapy.

Peritoneal dialysis in China: meeting the challenge of chronic kidney failure

Due to limited medical and economic resources, particularly in the countryside and remote areas, the proportion of individuals with end-stage kidney disease who are treated with dialysis in China is only about 20%. For the rest, renal replacement therapy currently is not available. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has been developed and used for more than 30 years in China to treat patients with end-stage kidney disease. Several national PD centers of first-rate scale and quality have sprung up, but the development of PD varies widely among geographic regions across China. The Chinese government has dedicated itself to continually increasing the coverage and level of medical service for patients with end-stage kidney disease. Under the guidance of the government and because of promotion by kidney care professionals, presently there are more than 40,000 prevalent PD patients in China, representing approximately 20% of the total dialysis population. Recently, a National Dialysis Unit Training Program for countywide hospitals has been initiated. Through the efforts of programs like this, we believe that awareness of PD and advances in the underlying technology will benefit more patients with end-stage kidney disease in China.