Current knowledge on the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection

An ultrasensitive genosensor for detection of toxigenic and non-toxigenic Clostridioides difficile based on a conserved sequence in surface layer protein coding gene

Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) is the most common agent of antibiotic-associated diarrhea, leading to intestinal infection through the secretion of two major toxins. Not all strains of this bacterium are toxigenic, but some of them cause infection via their accessory virulence factors, such as surface layer protein (SlpA). SlpA is conserved in both toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains of C. difficile. In the present work, an amplification-free electrochemical genosensor was designed for the detection of the slpA gene. A glassy carbon electrode coated with gold nanoparticle-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite was used as the working electrode, and its surface was modified using a simple thiolated linear oligonucleotide as the bioreceptor. Moreover, the hexaferrocenium tri[hexa(isothiocyanato) iron(III)] trihydroxonium (HxFc) complex was used as an intercalator, and its redox signal was recorded using differential pulse voltammetry. Scan rate studies indicated a quasi-reversible adsorption-controlled process for the HxFc complex. This genosensor showed high sensitivity with a limit of detection of 0.2 fM, a linear response range of 0.46-1900 fM, and a satisfactory specificity toward the synthetic slpA target gene. Also, the genosensor indicated responses in the mentioned linear range toward the genome extracted from either toxigenic or non-toxigenic strains of C. difficile.

Comparative evaluation of the STANDARD M10 and Xpert C. difficile assays for detection of toxigenic Clostridioides difficile in stool specimens

This study compared the performance of two commercial molecular assays, the STANDARD M10 Clostridioides difficile assay (M10) and the Xpert C. difficile assay (Xpert), for detecting toxigenic C. difficile in stool specimens. A total of 487 consecutive stool specimens submitted for routine C. difficile testing between June and November 2023 were included. Following routine testing using C. DIFF QUIK CHEK COMPLETE (QCC), M10 and Xpert were tested in parallel, alongside toxigenic culture (reference standard). Additionally, two-step algorithms, using QCC on the first step and either M10 or Xpert on the second step, were assessed. Both M10 and Xpert demonstrated a sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%. M10 exhibited significantly higher specificity and positive predictive value (PPV; 91.9% and 64.2%, respectively) than Xpert (90.3% and 59.8%, respectively). Both two-step algorithms showed a sensitivity and NPV of 98.4% and 99.8%, respectively. The specificity and PPV of the two-step algorithm using M10 (95.2% and 75.0%, respectively) were slightly higher than those of the one using Xpert (94.8% and 73.2%, respectively), without statistical significance. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, assessing the predictive ability of cycle threshold (Ct) values for the detection of free toxin, exhibited an area under the curve of 0.825 for M10 and 0.843 for Xpert. This indicates the utility of Ct values as predictors for the detection of free toxin in both assays. In conclusion, M10 proves to be an effective diagnostic tool with performance comparable to Xpert, whether utilized independently or as part of a two-step algorithm.

Testing and Diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Special Scenarios: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a clinical and laboratory diagnosis. Populations at higher risk of developing disease require a high clinical index of suspicion for laboratory testing to avoid incorrect assumptions of colonization. Common risk factors include recent antibiotic use, elderly (>65 years old), and immunocompromised patients. C. difficile assays should be ordered in an algorithm approach to diagnose an infection rather than colonization. Screening tests are widely available in hospital systems, but novel molecular testing may aid in diagnosis in patients with inconclusive or discordant antigen and toxin test results.  Methods: Data was extracted from PubMed, Scopus, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases based on the keywords "clostridioides difficile", "toxin assay", and "toxic megacolon". The data extracted is based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. A total of 27 reports were included in this systematic review.

RESULTS

Testing patients with a significant gastrointestinal surgical history, hypogammaglobulinemia, inflammatory bowel disease, intensive care unit, and immunocompromised patients for CDI is highly recommended. Diarrhea in these subsets of patients requires correlation of clinical context and an understanding of assay results to avoid over- and under-treating.

CONCLUSION

CDI should be considered in all patients with traditional risk factors. Heightened clinical suspicion of CDI is required in patients with hypogammaglobulinemia, transplant recipients, patients with gastrointestinal surgical history, and inflammatory bowel disease. Testing should be limited to patients with clinical manifestations of CDI to ensure a high pretest probability for test interpretation. Healthcare workers should adhere to testing algorithms to optimize yield in the appropriate clinical context. Diagnostic assays should follow a sequential, stepwise approach to categorize the toxin expression status of the bacteria accurately.

Analysis of Intestinal Mycobiota of Patients with Clostridioides difficile Infection among a Prospective Inpatient Cohort

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a burden to health care systems worldwide. Gut microbiota dysbiosis associated with CDI has been well accepted. However, contribution of fungal mycobiota to CDI has recently gained research interest. Here, we report the gut mycobiota composition of 149 uniquely well characterized participants from a prospective clinical cohort and evaluate the discriminating ability of gut mycobiota to classify CDI and non-CDI patients. Fecal samples were divided into two groups: (i) CDI (inpatients who had clinically significant diarrhea and positive nucleic acid amplification testing [NAAT] and received subsequent CDI therapy, n = 58) and (ii) non-CDI, which can be further divided into three subgroups: (a) carrier (inpatients with positive stool NAAT but without diarrhea; n = 28); (b) diarrhea (inpatients with negative stool NAAT; n = 31); and (c) control (inpatients with negative stool NAAT and without diarrhea; n = 32). Fecal mycobiota composition was analyzed by internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) sequencing. In comparison to non-CDI patients, CDI patients tend to have gut mycobiota with lower biodiversity, weaker fungi correlations, and weaker correlations between fungi and host immune factors. Notably, 11 genera (Saccharomyces, Penicillium, Aspergillus, Cystobasidium, Cladosporium, and so on) were significantly enriched in non-CDI patients, and Pichia and Suhomyces were enriched in patients with CDI, while 1 two genera, Cystobasidium and Exophiala, had higher abundance in patients with diarrhea compared with CDI (linear discriminant analysis [LDA] > 3.0; P < 0.05). Ascomycota and Basidiomycota (or Candida and Saccharomyces) exhibited a strong negative correlation (r ≤ -0.714 or r ≤ -0.387; P < 0.05), and the ratios of Ascomycota to Basidiomycota or genera Candida to Saccharomyces were dramatically higher in CDI patients than in non-CDI patients (P < 0.05). A disease-specific pattern with much weaker fungal abundance correlations was observed in the CDI group compared to that in the non-CDI and diarrhea groups, suggesting that these correlations may contribute to the development of CDI. Our findings provided specific markers of stool fungi that distinguish CDI from all non-CDI hospitalized patients. This study's potential clinical utility for better CDI diagnosis warrants further investigation. IMPORTANCE Clostridioides difficile is an opportunistic bacterial pathogen that causes a serious and potentially life-threatening infection of the human gut. It remains an existing challenge to distinguish active infection of CDI from diarrhea with non-CDI causes. A few large prospective studies from recent years suggest that there is no single optimal test for the diagnosis of CDI. Previous research has concentrated on the relationship between bacteria and CDI, while the roles of fungi, as a significant proportion of the gut microbial ecosystem, remain understudied. In this study, we report a series of fungal markers that may add diagnostic values for the development of a more systematic approach to accurate CDI diagnosis. These results help open the door for better understanding of the relationship between host immune factors and the fungal community in the context of CDI pathogenesis.

Microbial Resistance to Antibiotics and Effective Antibiotherapy

Currently, the efficacy of antibiotics is severely affected by the emergence of the antimicrobial resistance phenomenon, leading to increased morbidity and mortality worldwide. Multidrug-resistant pathogens are found not only in hospital settings, but also in the community, and are considered one of the biggest public health concerns. The main mechanisms by which bacteria develop resistance to antibiotics include changes in the drug target, prevention of entering the cell, elimination through efflux pumps or inactivation of drugs. A better understanding and prediction of resistance patterns of a pathogen will lead to a better selection of active antibiotics for the treatment of multidrug-resistant infections.

Nationwide Survey for Current Status of Laboratory Diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Korea

BACKGROUND

The interest in Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has increased, and the choice of assays became wider since the first national survey in Korea on CDI diagnosis in 2015. We conducted a survey of the domestic CDI assays with more varied questions to understand the current situation in Korea.

METHODS

In April 2018, about 50 questions on the current status of CDI assays and details on implementation and perceptions were written, and a survey questionnaire was administered to laboratory medicine specialists in 200 institutions.

RESULTS

One-hundred and fifty institutions responded to the questionnaire, of which 90 (60.0%) including one commercial laboratory, performed CDI assays. The toxin AB enzyme immunoassay (toxin AB EIA), nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), and C. difficile culture, glutamate dehydrogenase assay, alone or in combination with other assays, were used in 75 (84.3%), 52 (58.4%), 35 (36.0%), and 23 (25.8%), respectively, and 65 (73.0%) institutions performed a combination of two or more assays. The sensitivity of toxin AB EIA was more negatively perceived, and that on specificity was more positively perceived. The perception of sensitivity and specificity of NAAT was mostly positive. Perception on the algorithm test projected it as useful but in need of countermeasures. Sixty-three (73.3%) institutions responded that they performed surveillance on CDI.

CONCLUSION

This study provides useful evidence on the current status of CDI laboratory diagnosis in Korea as well as on items that require improvement and is thought to aid in standardizing and improving the CDI laboratory diagnosis in Korea.

Prevalence of Detection of Clostridioides difficile Among Asymptomatic Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Detection of Clostridioides difficile has frequently been described in asymptomatic infants and children, but accurate estimates across the age spectrum are unavailable.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence of C difficile detection among asymptomatic children across the age spectrum.

DATA SOURCES

This systematic review and meta-analysis included a search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles published from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2020. Search terms included Clostridium difficile, Peptoclostridium difficile, Clostridioides difficile, CDF OR CDI OR c diff OR c difficile, Clostridium infections OR cd positive diarrhea OR cd positive diarrhea OR Clostridium difficile OR Peptoclostridium difficile OR pseudomembranous colitis OR pseudomembranous enterocolitis, enterocolitis, and pseudomembranous. These were combined with the following terms: bacterial colonization and colonization OR colonized OR colonizing OR epidemiology OR prevalence OR seroprevalence.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were screened independently by 2 authors. Studies were included if they reported testing for C difficile among asymptomatic children (ie, children without diarrhea) younger than 18 years.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data were extracted independently and in duplicate by 2 reviewers. Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were used. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was prevalence of C difficile detection among asymptomatic children. Secondary outcomes included prevalence of toxigenic vs nontoxigenic strains of C difficile and prevalence of C difficile detection stratified by geographic region, income status, testing method, and year of testing.

RESULTS

A total of 95 studies with 19 186 participants were included. Rates of detection of toxigenic or nontoxigenic C difficile were greatest among infants aged 6 to 12 months (41%; 95% CI, 32%-50%) and decreased to 12% (95% CI, 7%-18%) among children aged 5 to 18 years. The prevalence of toxigenic C difficile colonization was lower, peaking at 14% (95% CI, 8%-21%) among infants aged 6 to 12 months and decreasing to 6% (95% CI, 2%-11%) among children older than 5 years. Although prevalence differed by geographic region (ie, North and South America vs Europe: β, -0.151, P = .001; North and South America vs Western Pacific: β, 0.136, P = .007), there was no difference by testing method (ie, culture vs polymerase chain reaction: β, 0.069, P = .052; culture vs enzyme immunoassay: β, -0.178, P = .051), income class (low-middle income vs high income: β, -0.144, P = .23; upper-middle vs high income: β, -0.020, P = .64), or period (before 1990 vs 2010-2020: β, -0.125, P = .19; 1990-1999 vs 2010-2020: β, -0.037, P = .42; 2000-2009 vs 2010-2020: β, -0.006, P = .86).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, C difficile colonization rates among children were greatest at 6 to 12 months of age and decreased thereafter. These estimates may provide context for interpreting C difficile test results among young children.

Cytomegalovirus-associated pseudomembranous colitis in a kidney transplant recipient

Pseudomembranous colitis (PMC) is classically associated with Clostridium difficile infection. We report a rare case of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-associated PMC in a 52-year-old female patient who had undergone kidney transplantation more than 20 years ago and was on low dose prednisolone and ciclosporin. She presented with an acute history of fever, lethargy, vomiting and diarrhoea on admission. Computed tomography of the abdomen showed extensive colitis, and colonoscopy revealed extensive pseudomembrane formation. Multiple tests for Clostridium difficile and other common microbiological causes of colitis were negative. CMV DNAemia and colonic biopsies confirmed the diagnosis of CMV colitis. The patient responded to prompt CMV treatment, as demonstrated by clinical, endoscopic, and histological response. While CMV is a common pathogen in the solid organ transplant population that is familiar to most transplant physicians, it may present atypically as PMC. Here, we review the literature on CMV-associated PMC and its relevance to solid organ transplant recipients. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of CMV-associated PMC in a kidney transplant recipient.

Fecal Mycobiota Combined With Host Immune Factors Distinguish Clostridioides difficile Infection From Asymptomatic Carriage

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Although the role of gut microbiota in Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has been well established, little is known about the role of mycobiota in CDI. Here, we performed mycobiome data analysis in a well-characterized human cohort to evaluate the potential of using gut mycobiota features for CDI diagnosis.

METHODS

Stool samples were collected from 118 hospital patients, divided into 3 groups: CDI (n = 58), asymptomatic carriers (Carrier, n = 28), and Control (n = 32). The nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer 2 was sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq platform to assess the fungal composition. Downstream statistical analyses (including Alpha diversity analysis, ordination analysis, differential abundance analysis, fungal correlation network analysis, and classification analysis) were then performed.

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed in alpha and beta diversity between patients with CDI and Carrier (P < .05). Differential abundance analysis identified 2 genera (Cladosporium and Aspergillus) enriched in Carrier. The ratio of Ascomycota to Basidiomycota was dramatically higher in patients with CDI than in Carrier and Control (P < .05). Correlations between host immune factors and mycobiota features were weaker in patients with CDI than in Carrier. Using 4 fungal operational taxonomic units combined with 6 host immune markers in the random forest classifier can achieve very high performance (area under the curve ∼92.38%) in distinguishing patients with CDI from Carrier.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides specific markers of stool fungi combined with host immune factors to distinguish patients with CDI from Carrier. It highlights the importance of gut mycobiome in CDI, which may have been underestimated. Further studies on the diagnostic applications and therapeutic potentials of these findings are warranted.

Paper-based multiplex analytical device for simultaneous detection of Clostridioides difficile toxins and glutamate dehydrogenase

We report a new paper-based multiplex analytical device (mPAD) for simultaneous screening of three analytes (glutamate dehydrogenase, toxin A, and toxin B) known as biomarkers for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). To overcome the limitation of common rapid assays (e.g. lateral flow immunochromatographic and enzyme immunoassays) in terms of multiplexing, sensitivity, simplicity, and ease-of-use, the mPAD is constructed with a three dimensional (3D) configuration of paper components with a multi-channel design. Multiple fluidic paths developed with wax-patterned paper allow the simultaneous detection of glutamate dehydrogenase, toxin A, and toxin B without any cross-reactivity. The 3D fluidic network on the mPAD facilitates a self-operating test procedure for the mixing and addition of amplification reagents with a one-step sliding operation. The results of the multiplex CDI assay can be easily interpreted by the naked eye within 10 min, and are visually intensified over time resulting in up to 3-fold signal amplification. Our device exhibited remarkable analytical performances for the simultaneous detection of three CDI biomarkers, providing a sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 88%, accuracy of 95%, and limits of detection for glutamate dehydrogenase, toxin A, and toxin B of 0.16 ng mL^-1, 0.09 ng mL^-1, and 0.03 ng mL^-1, respectively. These results indicate the high applicability and feasibility of mPAD for multiplex testing for CDI with the advantages of being simple, sensitive, inexpensive, user-friendly, and equipment-free.

Clostridioides difficile laboratory diagnostic techniques: a comparative approach of rapid and molecular methods

Clostridioides difficile infection is a public health problem because of it is easily spread; with harmful consequences, it is essential to reduce hospital costs and prevent its dissemination by having a precise diagnosis. The gold standard for its diagnosis is polymerase chain reaction (PCR); however, the technique is not available for all laboratories due to the high cost. New approaches using non-molecular tests to detect C. difficile and toxin A/B production has been proposed to improve cost benefits. The objective of this study is to compare molecular methods (PCR) and rapid methods (immunochromatographic test and enzymatic immunoassay). A series of tests comprising these diagnostic techniques was performed with 50 patients with a clinical diagnosis for Clostridioides difficile on GeneXpert® devices test; a calculation of the sensitivity was executed, followed by a comparison of the efficiency of all techniques. Greater sensitivity was observed in the PCR-based methods (BD MAX™ and BioFire FilmArray®) and the GDH-based assays (RIDASCREEN® and Alere Techlab®). The proposed algorithm represents minor monetary disadvantages but a significant temporal optimization of 10%. Future studies concerning both positive and negative results could be advantageous because of the possibility of calculating more method concordance indexes, such as the specificity and Kappa index, in addition to being able to indicate a monetary profit if the proposed algorithm was applied due to the nonproceeding PCR cases.

Retrospective Definition of Clostridioides difficile PCR Ribotypes on the Basis of Whole Genome Polymorphisms: A Proof of Principle Study

Clostridioides difficile is a cause of health care-associated infections. The epidemiological study of C. difficile infection (CDI) traditionally involves PCR ribotyping. However, ribotyping will be increasingly replaced by whole genome sequencing (WGS). This implies that WGS types need correlation with classical ribotypes (RTs) in order to perform retrospective clinical studies. Here, we selected genomes of hyper-virulent C. difficile strains of RT001, RT017, RT027, RT078, and RT106 to try and identify new discriminatory markers using in silico ribotyping PCR and De Bruijn graph-based Genome Wide Association Studies (DBGWAS). First, in silico ribotyping PCR was performed using reference primer sequences and 30 C. difficile genomes of the five different RTs identified above. Second, discriminatory genomic markers were sought with DBGWAS using a set of 160 independent C. difficile genomes (14 ribotypes). RT-specific genetic polymorphisms were annotated and validated for their specificity and sensitivity against a larger dataset of 2425 C. difficile genomes covering 132 different RTs. In silico PCR ribotyping was unsuccessful due to non-specific or missing theoretical RT PCR fragments. More successfully, DBGWAS discovered a total of 47 new markers (13 in RT017, 12 in RT078, 9 in RT106, 7 in RT027, and 6 in RT001) with minimum q-values of 0 to 7.40 × 10^-5, indicating excellent marker selectivity. The specificity and sensitivity of individual markers ranged between 0.92 and 1.0 but increased to 1 by combining two markers, hence providing undisputed RT identification based on a single genome sequence. Markers were scattered throughout the C. difficile genome in intra- and intergenic regions. We propose here a set of new genomic polymorphisms that efficiently identify five hyper-virulent RTs utilizing WGS data only. Further studies need to show whether this initial proof-of-principle observation can be extended to all 600 existing RTs.

Clostridioides difficile Infection: The Challenge, Tests, and Guidelines

Clostridioides difficile is a dangerous human pathogen because it can grow to high numbers in the intestine, cause colitis with its potent toxins, and persist as spores. C. difficile infection (CDI) is the primary hospital-acquired infection in North America and Europe, and it now is a global disease. Even with newer laboratory tests, there still is confusion on accurately diagnosing this disease. Three guidelines from three different healthcare-affiliated societies have recently been published. Consensus consolidated recommendations from these guidelines should be recognized by healthcare professionals, who need to understand why this disease continues to be difficult to diagnose and need a clear understanding of the advantages and limitations of current tests. Hopefully, these combined efforts will lead to an improvement in the recognition of this pathogen and a reduction in the suffering and economic loss caused by CDI.

Evaluating appropriateness and diagnostic stewardship opportunities of multiplex polymerase chain reaction gastrointestinal testing within a hospital system

Objective:

This single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study evaluates the appropriateness of the BioFire® FilmArray® Gastrointestinal (GI) multiplex PCR panel testing at a community-teaching hospital.

Methods:

All adult, hospitalized patients at Prisma Health Richland Hospital with a documented GI multiplex PCR panel from 1 April 2015 through 28 February 2018 were included in the analysis. Inappropriate use of the GI panel was defined as a test obtained without documented diarrhea, greater than 2 days of hospitalization, redundant use with other diagnostic tests (e.g. Clostridioides difficile PCR), or laxative use in the preceding 48 h. Antibiotic use and host variables were compared between groups with positive and negative results.

Results:

During the study period, 442 GI panels were obtained, among which 268 (61%) were deemed inappropriate. Primary reasons for inappropriate testing were lack of documented diarrhea (n = 92), greater than 2 days of hospitalization (n = 116), having a duplicate C. difficile PCR test ordered (n = 118), or laxative use in the 48 h before testing (n = 36). A total of 141 (32%) GI panels were positive. The most frequently identified pathogens were C. difficile (51.1%, n = 72), Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (17.7%, n = 25), and Norovirus GI/GII (12.1%, n = 17). Patients with negative GI panel results were initiated on antibiotics significantly less frequently than those with positive GI panels (62.5% versus 80.2%, p < 0.00001).

Conclusion:

Stewardship opportunities exist to optimize the diagnostic application of the GI multiplex PCR panel.

Molecular and non-molecular approaches to etiologic diagnosis of gastroenteritis

Gastroenteritis is a major cause of mortality and morbidity globally and rapid identification of the causative pathogen is important for appropriate treatment and patient management, implementation of effective infection control measures, reducing hospital length of stay, and reducing overall medical costs. Although stool culture and microscopic examination of diarrheal stool has been the primary method for laboratory diagnosis, culture-independent proteomic and genomic tests are receiving increased attention. Antigen tests for stool pathogens are routinely implemented as rapid and simple analytics whereas molecular tests are now available in various formats from high complexity to waived point-of-care tests. In addition, metagenomic next-generation sequencing stands poised for use as a method for both diagnosis and routine characterization of the gut microbiome in the very near future. Analysis of host biomarkers as indicators of infection status and pathogenesis may also become important for prediction, diagnosis, and monitoring of gastrointestinal infection. Here we review current methods and emerging technologies for the etiologic diagnosis of gastroenteritis in the clinical laboratory. Benefits and limitations of these evolving methods are highlighted.

A 2-step algorithm combining glutamate dehydrogenase and nucleic acid amplification tests for the detection of Clostridioides difficile in stool specimens

The optimized diagnosis algorithm of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is worldwide concerns. The purpose of this study was to assess the toxigenic C. difficile test performance and propose an optimal laboratory workflow for the diagnosis of CDI in mild virulent epidemic areas. Diarrhea samples collected from patients were analyzed by glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), toxin AB (CDAB), and nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). We assessed the performance of GDH, the GDH-CDAB algorithm, and the GDH-NAAT algorithm using toxigenic culture (TC) as a reference method. In this study, 186 diarrhea samples were collected. The numbers of TC-positive and TC-negative samples were 39 and 147, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and kappa of the GDH assay were 100%, 80.3%, 57.4%, 100%, and 0.63; of the GDH-CDAB algorithm were 48.7%, 97.3%, 82.6%, 87.7%, and 0.54; and of the GDH-NAAT algorithm were 74.4%, 100%, 100%, 93.6%, and 0.82, respectively. The GDH-NAAT algorithm has great concordance with TC in detecting toxigenic C. difficile (kappa = 0.82), while the sensitivity of the GDH-CDAB algorithm was too low to meet the demand of CDI diagnosis clinically. GDH-NAAT algorithm is recommended for the detection of toxigenic C. difficile with high specificity, increased sensitivity, and cost-effective.

Diarrhea or No Diarrhea, It Still Hurts: An Atypical Case of Clostridioides difficile

Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) is a common nosocomial infection that is classically described as profuse watery diarrhea in hospitalized patients after antibiotic use. We present a case of a 76-year-old female who presented to our emergency room with diffuse abdominal pain after consuming meals. This patient had completed treatment with oral vancomycin for C. difficile infection two weeks prior to admission and had been asymptomatic until this point. After receiving treatments for presumed acute mesenteric ischemia did not yield clinical improvement, polymerase chain reaction for C. difficile stool antigen was tested and was positive. While the patient did not have diarrhea, the classical feature of C. difficile infection, she quickly improved after treatment with oral vancomycin.

Clostridium Difficile Infection in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

BACKGROUND

The rising incidence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in the general population has been recognized by health care organizations worldwide. The emergence of hypervirulent strains has made CDI more challenging to understand and treat. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are at higher risk of infection, including CDI.

OBJECTIVE

A diagnostic approach for recurrent CDI has yet to be validated, particularly for IBD patients. Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for toxins A and B, as well as glutamate dehydrogenase EIA, are both rapid testing options for the identification of CDI. Without a high index of suspicion, it is challenging to initially differentiate CDI from an IBD flare based on clinical evaluation alone.

METHODS

Here, we provide an up-to-date review on CDI in IBD patients. When caring for an IBD patient with suspected CDI, it is appropriate to empirically treat the presumed infection while awaiting further test results.

RESULTS

Treatment with vancomycin or fidaxomicin, but not oral metronidazole, has been advocated by an expert review from the clinical practice update committee of the American Gastroenterology Association. Recurrent CDI is more common in IBD patients compared to non-IBD patients (32% versus 24%), thus more aggressive treatment is recommended for IBD patients along with early consideration of fecal microbiota transplant.

CONCLUSION

Although the use of infliximab during CDI has been debated, clinical experience exists supporting its use in an IBD flare, even with active CDI when needed.

Colonization of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile Among Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Multi-Centre Cross-Sectional Study

Background:Clostridium difficile (CD) is a major cause of healthcare-associated infections and antibiotic-associated diarrhea in hospitalized patients worldwide. Carriers of toxigenic CD (tCD) have a higher risk of developing CD infections and can transmit CD to the environment and susceptible patients. However, little is known regarding the carriers and transmission of tCD in China.

Methods: A multi-center cross-sectional study of tCD colonization (tCDC) was conducted from October 24 to 31, 2014, at 33 hospitals in Shanghai, China. Rectal swabs or stool samples were collected and tested, and the clinical and demographic status, epidemiological data, and blood parameters of 531 participants were recorded. The status of tCDC was defined by a positive result on the nucleic acid amplification test for the tcdA (toxin A), tcdB (toxin B), and cdtAB (toxin CDT) genes after positive bacterial culture.

Results: The overall prevalence of CD colonization (CDC) was 19.02%, tCDC accounted for 92.08%, and A+B+CDT– was the dominant genotype (87.13%). The CD infection (CDI) prevalence was 1.51%. Potential tCDC-associated factors were admission to secondary grade hospitals, a body mass index <18.5, hospitalization during the previous 30 days, underlying diseases (including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, and respiratory failure), diarrhea during the previous 7 days, and exposure to fluoroquinolones or lansoprazole.

Conclusions: This study reveals the prevalence of CDC and tCDC in Shanghai, elucidates several associated factors, contributes to the awareness of the current epidemiology in parts of eastern China and provides new insights for further study and infection control practices.

Analysis of Routine and Integrative Data from Clostridioides difficile Infection Diagnosis and the Consequent Observations

Background:

Clostridioides difficileInfection (CDI) is an acute disease that needs a fast proper treatment. Unfortunately, the diagnosis, and above all the understanding of the results, remain arduous.

Objective:

This study analyzed routine and integrative results of all fecal samples from patients over time. Our aim was to understand the dynamics of CDI infection and the meaning of “difficult to interpret” results, to make physicians better understand the various tools they can use.

Methods:

We evaluated routine results obtained from 815 diarrheal stools with Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) that detectsC. difficileGlutamate Dehydrogenase (GDH) antigen and toxin B. We also reanalyzed a part of samples using integrative tests: a Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) forC. difficiletoxin B gene (tcdB) and the automated immunoassay VIDASC. difficilesystem for GDH and toxins A/B.

Results:

EIA GDH positivity increased through multiple testing over time, with aPvalue <0.001, depicting a sort of bacterial growth curve. Eighty-five percent of GDH positive/toxin B negative,i.e., discrepant, samples PCR weretcdBpositive, 61.5% of discrepanttcdBpositive samples were VIDAS toxins A/B positive, and 44.4% of GDH EIA negative stools were VIDAS GDH positive.

Conclusion:

The results confirmed the low sensitivity of the EIA system forC. difficileGDH and toxins, questioned the use of the latter for concluding any CDI diagnostic algorithm, and led us to indicate the algorithm beginning with tcdB molecular research, and continuing in positive cases with VIDAS CD GDH method, as the most effective for CDI.

A Two-Step Approach for Diagnosing Glutamate Dehydrogenase Genes by Conventional Polymerase Chain Reaction from Clostridium difficile Isolates

BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile is the major causative agent of nosocomial antibiotic-associated colitis. The gold standard for C. difficile detection is stool culture followed by cytotoxic assay, although it is laborious and time-consuming. We developed a screening test based on a two-step conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) approach to detect gluD, the glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) enzyme gene, which is a marker for screening of C. difficile. Targeting gluD comparing to the conserved stable genetic element of pathogenicity locus (PaLoc), with an accessory gene of Cdd3, was an effective method for the detection of this pathogen from patients with enterocolitis.

METHODS

Fresh fecal samples of the patients who were clinically suspicious for antibiotic-associated colitis were collected. Stool specimens were cultured on the cycloserine-cefoxitin fructose agar (CCFA) in an anaerobic condition, following alcohol shock treatment and enrichment in Clostridium difficile Brucella broth (CDBB). On confirmed colonies, PCR was carried out for detection of PaLoc subsidiary gene, Cdd3, and toxicogenic genes, tcdA and tcdB. The gluD that is GDH gene detection was performed by conventional PCR on the extracted DNA from 578 fresh stool samples.

RESULTS

57 (9.8%) strains of C. difficile were approved by conventional PCR for gluD and Cdd3 genes, in which 37 (6.4%) colonies had tcdA+/tcdB+ genotype, 2 (0.3%) tcdA+/tcdB-, 4 (0.7%) tcdA-/ tcdB+ and the remaining 14 (2.4%) colonies were tcdA and tcdB negative.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that targeting gluD by PCR is quite promising for rapid detection of C. difficile from fresh fecal samples. Furthermore, the multiple-gene analysis for tcdA and tcdB assay proved a reliable approach for diagnosing of toxigenic strains among clinical samples.

Clostridioides difficile in Outpatients: Application of a Diagnostic Algorithm Recommended by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

This study aimed at evaluating in outpatients an algorithm for the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection (CDI), i.e., enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) detecting bacterial glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxin A/B, followed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analyses of samples with discordant EIA results.

In total, 9802 examinations of stool samples by GDH and toxin EIAs performed in 7263 outpatients and 488 inpatients were analyzed retrospectively. Samples with discordant EIA results had been tested by a commercially available PCR assay detecting genes of the C. difficile-specific triose phosphate isomerase (tpi) and toxin B (tcdB). Concordant EIA results (686 C. difficile-positive, 8121 negative) were observed for 8807 (89.8%; 95% CI, 89.2–90.4%) samples. Of 958 samples with discordant EIA results, 895 were analyzed using PCR and 580 of 854 GDH-positive/borderline, toxin-negative samples (67.9%; 95% CI, 64.7–71.0%) were positive for tpi and tcdB, while 274 samples (32.1%; 95% CI, 29.0–35.3%) were tcdB-negative. In contrast, 35 of 41 GDH-negative, toxin-positive/borderline samples (85.4%; 95% CI, 71.2–93.5%) were tcdB-negative. Still, 6 samples (14.6%; 95% CI, 6.5–28.8%) yielded positive PCR results for both genes.

In conclusion, around 90% of the samples were analyzed appropriately by only applying EIAs. Approximately one third of the PCR-analyzed samples were tcdB-negative; thus, patients most likely did not require CDI treatment.

Clostridium difficile infection in inflammatory bowel disease: epidemiology over two decades

BACKGROUND

The incidence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been rising in the overall population as well as in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, the incidence of CDI in IBD may be changing owing to alterations in medical therapies.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to establish the incidence of CDI in IBD over the past two decades and compare risk factors, disease characteristics and outcomes between IBD and non-IBD patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective case-control study, the incidence of CDI in IBD was followed for 18 years. The electronic database of our centre was reviewed for all stool samples received from patients admitted to gastroenterology wards or visiting the outpatient clinic. Diagnosis of CDI was based on diagnostic criteria that evolved throughout the years.

RESULTS

IBD patients (n=44) with CDI were found to be younger (P=0.0001), have less cardiovascular comorbidity (P=0.023), fewer prior hospitalizations (P=0.009) and fewer prior antibiotic use (P=0.005). More IBD patients were on biologic therapy (P=0.0001) or steroids (P=0.001) but less likely taking proton pump inhibitors (P=0.001). The number of stool testing per year increased as well as the median number of positive stool samples for CDI (2% in 2000-2008 to 3% in 2009-2017, P=0.032). Pseudomembranes were only seen in non-IBD patients (28%, P=0.048). There was no difference in the choice of antibiotics between IBD and non-IBD patients [metronidazole (36 vs. 51%) and vancomycin (36 vs. 26%), P=0.090 and 0.190]. The 1-year mortality rate was lower in IBD patients compared with non-IBD patients (0 vs. 32%, P=0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In the past two decades, the incidence of CDI in IBD and non-IBD patients has increased. However, the overall outcome of CDI in IBD patients was favourable compared with non-IBD patients.

Consensus on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of Clostridium difficile infection

In recent decades, Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has become a worldwide health problem. Mexico is no exception, and therefore the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología brought together a multidisciplinary group (gastroenterologists, endoscopists, internists, infectious disease specialists, and microbiologists) to carry out the "Consensus on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of Clostridium difficile infection", establishing useful recommendations (in relation to the adult population) for the medical community. Said recommendations are presented herein. Among them, it was recognized that CDI should be suspected in subjects with diarrhea that have a history of antibiotic and/or immunosuppressant use, but that it can also be a community-acquired infection. A 2-step diagnostic algorithm was proposed, in which a highly sensitive test, such as glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), is first utilized, and if positive, confirmed by the detection of toxins through immunoassay or nucleic acid detection tests. Another recommendation was that CDI based on clinical evaluation be categorized as mild-moderate, severe, and complicated severe, given that such a classification enables better therapeutic decisions to be made. In mild-moderate CDI, oral vancomycin is the medication of choice, and metronidazole is recommended as an alternative treatment. In addition, fecal microbiota transplantation was recognized as an efficacious option in patients with recurrence or in the more severe cases of infection, and surgery should be reserved for patients with severe colitis (toxic megacolon), in whom all medical treatment has failed.

An Updated Review of Clostridium difficile Treatment in Pediatrics

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) continues to have clinical and economic impact across all health care settings. Pediatrics accounts for a small percentage of worldwide infection; however, screening and diagnosis are confounded by asymptomatic colonization in young infants. Metronidazole and oral vancomycin have historically been the agents used to manage CDI in both pediatrics and adults. Newer agents and alternative therapies, such as fecal microbiota transplantation, may offer additional benefit. Recent guidelines updates from the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America separate pediatric and adult recommendations for epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. This review will discuss the risk factors, management, prevention, and updated guideline recommendations for CDI in the pediatric population.

2019 update of the WSES guidelines for management of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection in surgical patients

In the last three decades, Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has increased in incidence and severity in many countries worldwide. The increase in CDI incidence has been particularly apparent among surgical patients. Therefore, prevention of CDI and optimization of management in the surgical patient are paramount. An international multidisciplinary panel of experts from the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) updated its guidelines for management of CDI in surgical patients according to the most recent available literature. The update includes recent changes introduced in the management of this infection.

Advancing Infectious Diseases Diagnostic Testing and Applications to Antimicrobial Therapy in the ICU

Treatment of suspected infections in critically ill patients requires the timely initiation of appropriate antimicrobials and rapid de-escalation of unnecessary broad-spectrum coverage. New advances in rapid diagnostic tests can now offer earlier detection of pathogen and potential resistance mechanisms within hours of initial culture growth. These technologies, combined with pharmacist antimicrobial stewardship efforts, may result in shorten time to adequate coverage or earlier de-escalation of unnecessary broad spectrum antimicrobials, which could improve patient outcomes and lower overall treatment cost. Furthermore, de-escalation of antimicrobials may lead to decreased emergence of resistant organisms and adverse events associated with antimicrobials. Clinical pharmacists should be aware of new rapid diagnostic tests, including their application, clinical evidence, and limitations, in order to implement the most appropriate clinical treatment strategy when patients have positive cultures. This review will focus on commercially available rapid diagnostic tests for infections that are routinely encountered by critically ill patients, including gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial blood stream infections, Candida, and Clostridioides difficile.

Clostridium difficile infections in teaching hospital in northern Finland

Background

The aim of this study to compare the incidence of Clostridium difficile (CD) infections in the five university hospital districts in Finland based on national register. The clinical findings of CD cases in the Oulu University Hospital (OUH) in one-year cohort were also analyzed.

Methods

The numbers of the CD cases from the national register were used for the hospital district comparison. A retrospective cohort study was conducted among all adult (> 16 years) patients treated in the OUH in 2013, who had positive CD toxin B gene test in stools. The selection of the cohort was based on the data from the OUH microbiology laboratory and the clinical characteristics were collected from hospital records.

Results

The incidence of CD findings in 2013 was higher in the OUH district than in the other four university hospital districts: 159 vs. 70 to 84 per 100,000 inhabitants.

In 2013, 261 patients had CD infection treated in the OUH. The yearly number of CD cases treated in the OUH in 2009–2016 varied between 221 and 287, and the corresponding proportion of positive CD findings out of all samples taken varied from 10.0 to 17.8%. A recurrent infection was seen in 58 patients (22%) while the all-cause 30 day mortality was 7.3%.

Conclusions

Diagnostic strategies differed nationally, which may explain the differences in CD incidence between the university hospital districts. In the OUH, no increase in the number of CD infections was seen in 2009–2016. Main characteristics of the patient cohort in the OUH were in harmony with earlier literature.

Effectiveness of a Two-Step Testing Algorithm for Reliable and Cost-Effective Detection of Clostridium difficile Infection in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Saudi Arabia

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a two-step algorithm for the detection of Clostridium difficile infection. Setting and Design: A two-step testing algorithm was evaluated for testing stool samples from patients suspected of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). A total of 103 stool specimens were tested using the C. diff Quik Chek Complete enzyme immunoassay (EIA) test and the Xpert C. difficile PCR test. A two-step algorithm was implemented, and data from 3518 patient samples tested during a two-year period after implementation were analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) of the Quik Chek Complete EIA test were calculated using the Xpert C. difficile PCR test as a reference method. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the Quik Chek Complete EIA test for C. difficile toxin were 46.7%, 100%, 100%, and 91%, respectively. The two-step algorithm, which combined the Quik Chek Complete EIA with Xpert C. difficile PCR, improved the sensitivity and also provided rapid detection. When algorithm-based testing was performed daily, there was a 66% reduction in turnaround time compared to batch testing using a lengthy ELISA procedure. Postimplementation data analysis showed that almost 89% of the samples could be reported immediately by initial screening with Quik Chek Complete EIA. Only 11% of the samples gave discrepant results and required PCR confirmation. According to our results, the two-step algorithm is an effective tool for the rapid and reliable detection of toxigenic C. difficile from stool samples.

2019 update of the WSES guidelines for management of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection in surgical patients

In the last three decades, Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has increased in incidence and severity in many countries worldwide. The increase in CDI incidence has been particularly apparent among surgical patients. Therefore, prevention of CDI and optimization of management in the surgical patient are paramount. An international multidisciplinary panel of experts from the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) updated its guidelines for management of CDI in surgical patients according to the most recent available literature. The update includes recent changes introduced in the management of this infection.

Clostridium difficile infection in oncology patients: epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most common healthcare-associated infections in the United States. Its incidence has been increasing in the recent years despite preventative measures. CDI increases annual expenses by 1.5 billion dollars. Cancer patients are at higher risk to acquire CDI, as explained by their frequent exposure to risk factors. CDI in cancer patients is associated with higher mortality rates and prolonged hospitalization. Furthermore, CDI affects the course of the disease by delaying treatments such as chemotherapy. Chemotherapeutics drugs are considered independent risk factors for CDI. This review discusses Clostridium difficile infection in cancer patients, including those who are receiving chemotherapy. Herein, we summarize recent data regarding the epidemiology, risk factors, including chemotherapy regimens, pathogenesis, diagnostic techniques and treatment options, including newer agents. Method: A literature search was performed using the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. The MeSH terms utilized in different combinations were 'clostridium difficile', 'neoplasia/cancer/oncology', 'chemotherapy', 'diagnosis', and 'treatment', in addition to looking up each treatment option individually to generate a comprehensive search. The articles were initially screened by title alone, followed by screening through abstracts. Full texts of pertinent articles (including letters to editors, case reports, case series, cohort studies, and clinical trials) were included in this review.

Bacterial overgrowth, dysbiosis, inflammation, and dysmotility in the Cystic Fibrosis intestine

Gastrointestinal disease in Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is caused by defective chloride and bicarbonate transport in intestinal cells leading to reduced intraluminal fluidity, increased mucous viscosity and consequently development of intestinal inflammation, dysbiosis and often times dysmotility. This triad is also referred to as the "CF gut". A diagnosis is mainly based on clinical observation and treatment is often times decided empirically. This review of the literature should provide CF caregivers with some tools to identify intestinal inflammation, dysbiosis and dysmotility as possible cause for their patient's gastrointestinal complaints and provide an overview of our current approach to its management.

Equine duodenitis-proximal jejunitis: A review

Duodenitis-proximal jejunitis (DPJ) is an inflammatory process of the proximal part of the small intestine and occurs sporadically in horses. It is clinically characterized by an acute onset of ileus and nasogastric reflux leading to systemic signs of toxemia. This review discusses the definition of the disease, potential etiologic agents, clinical findings, epidemiological features, histopathologic and clinico-pathological findings, and medical management of this condition. Salmonella spp., mycotoxins, Clostridium perfringens, and Clostridium difficile have all been associated with the disease but there is limited supporting evidence for any agent other than C. difficile. Particular attention, however, was given to etiological investigations and the data available to support the proposed etiological agents. The potential role of C. difficile as the etiological agent of DPJ, possible pathogenesis, and recent efforts to support this hypothesis are highlighted, but it is recognized that there could be more than one agent that causes the disease.

Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile infections

Clostridium difficile is a leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea worldwide. The diagnosis of C. difficile infection (CDI) requires both clinical manifestations and a positive laboratory test for C. difficile and/or its toxins. While antibiotic therapy is the treatment of choice for CDI, there are relatively few classes of effective antibiotics currently available. Therefore, the development of novel antibiotics and/or alternative treatment strategies for CDI has received a great deal of attention in recent years. A number of emerging agents such as cadazolid, surotomycin, ridinilazole, and bezlotoxumab have demonstrated activity against C. difficile; some of these have been approved for limited clinical use and some are in clinical trials. In addition, other approaches such as early and accurate diagnosis of CDI as well as disease prevention are important for clinical management. While the toxigenic culture and the cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay are still recognized as the gold standard for the diagnosis of CDI, new diagnostic approaches such as nucleic acid amplification methods have become available. In this review, we will discuss both current and emerging diagnostic and therapeutic modalities for CDI.

Norovirus and Clostridium difficile outbreaks: squelching the wildfire

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gastrointestinal outbreaks in the healthcare setting cause increased morbidity and mortality in an already vulnerable population. Optimization of infection prevention measures can be a challenge in healthcare settings. This review describes new literature that may change the traditional infection prevention approach to such outbreaks.

RECENT FINDINGS

Asymptomatic carriers of both norovirus and Clostridium difficile can pose risk of transmission to others and the environment. Rapid recognition and diagnosis can decrease the extent of an outbreak. No-touch technologies for environmental disinfection are new and effective tools. Infection prevention consultant services and systems redesign can augment efforts to control baseline infection rates and outbreaks. Antimicrobial stewardship continues to be essential to prevent C. difficile infection.

SUMMARY

New approaches are needed to stem the tide of norovirus and C. difficile clusters and outbreaks in healthcare settings. Accurate recognition, testing, and implementation of infection prevention measures can be supported with rapid testing modalities, access to updated guidelines and no-touch disinfection systems. The work-environment culture should be carefully assessed and restructured using human engineering models to promote effective infection prevention practices. Antimicrobial stewardship initiatives are needed at the bedside and at national levels.

Evaluation of the cobas Cdiff Test for Detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Stool Samples

Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are reliable tools for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile from unformed (liquid or soft) stool samples. The objective of this study was to evaluate performance of the cobas Cdiff test on the cobas 4800 system using prospectively collected stool specimens from patients suspected of having C. difficile infection (CDI). The performance of the cobas Cdiff test was compared to the results of combined direct and broth-enriched toxigenic culture methods in a large, multicenter clinical trial. Additional discrepancy analysis was performed by using the Xpert C. difficile Epi test. Sample storage was evaluated by using contrived and fresh samples before and after storage at -20°C. Testing was performed on samples from 683 subjects (306 males and 377 females); 113 (16.5%) of 683 subjects were positive for toxigenic C. difficile by direct toxigenic culture, and 141 of 682 subjects were positive by using the combined direct and enriched toxigenic culture method (reference method), for a prevalence rate of 20.7%. The sensitivity and specificity of the cobas Cdiff test compared to the combined direct and enriched culture method were 92.9% (131/141; 95% confidence interval [CI], 87.4% to 96.1%) and 98.7% (534/541; 95% CI, 97.4% to 99.4%), respectively. Discrepancy analysis using results for retested samples from a second NAAT (Xpert C. difficile/Epi test; Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) found no false-negative and 4 false-positive cobas Cdiff test results. There was no difference in positive and negative results in comparisons of fresh and stored samples. These results support the use of the cobas Cdiff test as a robust aid in the diagnosis of CDI.