Overview and comparison of guidelines for management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms

Multi-omic biomarker panel in pancreatic cyst fluid and serum predicts patients at a high risk of pancreatic cancer development

Integration of multi-omic data for the purposes of biomarker discovery can provide novel and robust panels across multiple biological compartments. Appropriate analytical methods are key to ensuring accurate and meaningful outputs in the multi-omic setting. Here, we extensively profile the proteome and transcriptome of patient pancreatic cyst fluid (PCF) (n = 32) and serum (n = 68), before integrating matched omic and biofluid data, to identify biomarkers of pancreatic cancer risk. Differential expression analysis, feature reduction, multi-omic data integration, unsupervised hierarchical clustering, principal component analysis, spearman correlations and leave-one-out cross-validation were performed using RStudio and CombiROC software. An 11-feature multi-omic panel in PCF [PIGR, S100A8, REG1A, LGALS3, TCN1, LCN2, PRSS8, MUC6, SNORA66, miR-216a-5p, miR-216b-5p] generated an AUC = 0.806. A 13-feature multi-omic panel in serum [SHROOM3, IGHV3-72, IGJ, IGHA1, PPBP, APOD, SFN, IGHG1, miR-197-5p, miR-6741-5p, miR-3180, miR-3180-3p, miR-6782-5p] produced an AUC = 0.824. Integration of the strongest performing biomarkers generated a 10-feature cross-biofluid multi-omic panel [S100A8, LGALS3, SNORA66, miR-216b-5p, IGHV3-72, IGJ, IGHA1, PPBP, miR-3180, miR-3180-3p] with an AUC = 0.970. Multi-omic profiling provides an abundance of potential biomarkers. Integration of data from different omic compartments, and across biofluids, produced a biomarker panel that performs with high accuracy, showing promise for the risk stratification of patients with pancreatic cystic lesions.

Endoscopic ultrasound is useful for the risk stratification of mucinous pancreatic cystic lesions: A long-term prospective study

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this prospective observational study were to test worrisome features on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) as a stratification tool in patients with mucinous pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs), and to assess these patients' long-term risk of adenocarcinoma and mortality.

METHODS

Patients with suspected PCLs on cross-sectional imaging who underwent EUS-FNA at Sahlgrenska University Hospital between February 2007 and February 2018 were consecutively enrolled. The main inclusion criterion was the final diagnosis of a mucinous PCL. The results from EUS-FNA were analyzed in the context of outcome gathered from medical records of follow-up until February 2021.

RESULTS

Of 334 patients undergoing EUS-FNA, 171 (51 %) had a final diagnosis of a mucinous PCL. 29/171 (17 %) patients were diagnosed with HGD or adenocarcinoma <6 months after EUS-FNA, with 28/29 (97 %) patients having at least one worrisome feature on EUS-FNA. A solid component in mucinous PCLs on EUS was independently associated with the presence of HGD or adenocarcinoma (OR 23.6, 95 % CI 6.1-91.6, p < .001). A total of 4/142 (3 %) patients developed adenocarcinoma during the follow-up period (median = 61.4 months). Overall, in 80/82 (98 %) of the patients without worrisome features on EUS-FNA, HGD or adenocarcinoma was not detected. Six of the 21 (29 %) patients with HGD or adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery as initial management died from pancreatic cancer during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-FNA is useful for the risk stratification of mucinous PCLs. The low incidence of adenocarcinoma over time after a negative EUS-FNA may allow for a less resource intensive surveillance strategy.

Radiomics for differentiating pancreatic Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm from Serous Cystic Neoplasm: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

As pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) differ in current standard of care, and these treatments can affect quality of life to varying degrees, a definitive preoperative diagnosis must be reliable. Current diagnostic approaches, specifically traditional cross-sectional imaging techniques, face certain limitations. But radiomics has been shown to have high diagnostic accuracy across a range of diseases. Objective to conduct a comprehensive review of the literature on the use of radiomics to differentiate Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm (MCN) from Serous Cystic Neoplasm (SCN).

METHODS

This study was comprehensively searched in Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science databases for meta-analysis of studies that used radiomics to distinguish MCN from SCN. Risk of bias was assessed using the diagnostic accuracy study quality assessment method and combined with sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC)curve analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 884 patients from 8 studies were included in this analysis, including 365 MCN and 519 SCN. The Meta-analysis found that radiomics identified MCN and SCN with high sensitivity and specificity, with combined sensitivity and specificity of 0.84(0.82-0.87) and 0.82(0.79-0.84). The positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and the negative likelihood ratio (NLR) are 5.61(3.72, 8.47) and 0.14(0.09-0.26). In addition, the area under the SROC curve (AUC) was drawn at 0.93. No significant risk of publication bias was detected through the funnel plot analysis. The performances of feature extraction from the volume of interest (VOI) or Using AI classifier in the radiomics models were superior to those of protocols employing region of interest (ROI) or absence of AI classifier.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrates that radiomics exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between MCN and SCN, and has the potential to become a reliable diagnostic tool for their identification.

Exploring the new Kyoto guidelines for managing pancreatic cysts: an overview and comparison with previous guidelines

The rising use of diagnostic imaging has led to an increase in the incidental detection of pancreatic cysts, with reported incidences of 1.2-2.6% on Computed Tomography and 2.4-49.1% on Magnetic Resonance Imaging. While many of these cysts are asymptomatic and benign, the enhanced imaging techniques have also revealed malignant and premalignant lesions. Mucinous neoplasms, including intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) and mucinous cystic neoplasms, are particularly concerning due to their potential for malignant transformation. Recent studies highlight significant variations in dysplasia across IPMN types, with main duct IPMNs showing a higher likelihood of high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma compared to branch duct IPMNs. Management and follow-up of these lesions remain controversial due to inconsistent guidelines. This article reviews and compares six major guidelines: the 2015 American Gastroenterological Association guidelines, the 2017 International Association of Pancreatology (IAP/Fukuoka) guidelines, the 2017 American College of Radiology guidelines, the 2018 American College of Gastroenterology guidelines, the 2018 European Study Group guidelines, and the newly released, 2024 Kyoto guidelines. We summarize key differences in risk factors, surveillance protocols, and surgical referral criteria, with a focus on the updated 2024 Kyoto guidelines and the implications of recent research advancements.

Misdiagnosis of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and the challenge of mimicking lesions: imaging diagnosis and differentiation strategies

The rising prevalence of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs), particularly intraductal papillary neoplasms (IPMNs), has been attributed to increased utilization of advanced imaging techniques. Incidental detection of PCLs is frequent in abdominal CT and MRI scans, with IPMNs representing a significant portion of these lesions. Surveillance of IPMNs is recommended due to their malignant potential; however, their overlapping imaging features with benign entities can lead to misdiagnosis, overtreatment, and overutilization of healthcare resources. This paper aims to highlight and differentiate lesions often mistaken for IPMNs, providing insight into their imaging characteristics, diagnostic challenges, and distinctive features while highlighting the incidence of wrong diagnosis for these lesions. These lesions include serous cystadenomas, cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, mucinous cystic neoplasms, lymphoepithelial cysts, duodenal diverticula, pancreatic schwannomas, chronic pancreatitis, retention cysts, intrapancreatic accessory spleens, pancreatic lipomas, choledochal cysts, and others. Utilizing various imaging modalities, including contrast-enhanced CT, MRI, and EUS, alongside histological and molecular analyses, can aid in accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. Understanding these mimicry scenarios is crucial to avoid unnecessary surveillance, interventions, and the burden they place on both patients and healthcare systems. Improved recognition of these lesions can lead to better patient outcomes and resource allocation.

Multi-omic profiling of intraductal papillary neoplasms of the pancreas reveals distinct expression patterns and potential markers of progression

In order to advance our understanding of precancers in the pancreas, 69 pancreatic intraductal papillary neoplasms (IPNs), including 64 intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) and 5 intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasms (IOPNs), 32 pancreatic cyst fluid samples, 104 invasive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs), 43 normal adjacent tissues (NATs), and 76 macro-dissected normal pancreatic ducts (NDs) were analyzed by mass spectrometry. A total of 10,246 proteins and 22,284 glycopeptides were identified in all tissue samples, and 756 proteins with more than 1.5-fold increase in abundance in IPMNs relative to NDs were identified, 45% of which were also identified in cyst fluids. The over-expression of selected proteins was validated by immunolabeling. Proteins and glycoproteins overexpressed in IPMNs included those involved in glycan biosynthesis and the immune system. In addition, multiomics clustering identified two subtypes of IPMNs. This study provides a foundation for understanding tumor progression and targets for earlier detection and therapies.

Significance

This multilevel characterization of intraductal papillary neoplasms of the pancreas provides a foundation for understanding the changes in protein and glycoprotein expression during the progression from normal duct to intraductal papillary neoplasm, and to invasive pancreatic carcinoma, providing a foundation for informed approaches to earlier detection and treatment.

Novel Insights into Postoperative Surveillance in Resected Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms-A Review

Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) are frequently encountered in clinical practice and some are referred to surgery due to their neoplastic risk or malignant transformation. The management of PCL involves complex decision-making, with postoperative surveillance being a key component for long-term outcomes, due to the potential for recurrence and postoperative morbidity. Unfortunately, the follow-up of resected patients is far from being optimal and there is a lack of consensus on recommendations with regard to timing and methods of surveillance. Here, we summarize the current knowledge on the postoperative surveillance of neoplastic pancreatic cysts, focusing on the mechanisms and risk factors for recurrence, the recurrence rates according to the initial indication for surgery, the final result of the surgical specimen and neoplastic risk in the remaining pancreas, as well as the postsurgical morbidity comprising pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, metabolic dysfunction and diabetes after resection, according to the type of surgery performed. We analyze postsurgical recurrence rates and morbidity profiles, as influenced by different surgical techniques, to better delineate at-risk patients, and highlight the need for tailored surveillance strategies adapted to preoperative and operative factors with an impact on outcomes.

Pancreatic cysts: can surveillance interval for small low-risk lesions be lengthened?

BACKGROUND

Surveillance of pancreatic cysts are necessary due to risk of malignant transformation. However, reported progression rates to advanced neoplasia are variable and the high frequency of surveillance scans may pose a considerable burden on healthcare resources.

PURPOSE

To validate the effectiveness of the Fukuoka Guidelines surveillance regime and determine if a longer surveillance interval can be established.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of the pancreas performed at our institution between January 2014 and December 2016 with at least one pancreatic cystic lesion and follow-up MRI or computed tomography (CT) over at least two years were reviewed for size, worrisome feature (WF), and high-risk stigmata (HRS) at diagnosis and follow-up imaging (up to year 6). Reference standards for advanced neoplasia were based on endoscopic ultrasound, fine needle aspiration cytology, or the presence of ≥2 WF or ≥1 HRS on imaging. Comparison of MRI features of progression and outcomes of diagnostic endpoints between lesions <20 mm and ≥20 mm was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 270 patients were included (201 cysts <20 mm, 69 cysts ≥20 mm). Compared with cysts <20 mm, cysts ≥20 mm were more likely to be associated with WF or HRS (40.6% vs. 12.4%; P ≤0.00001), demonstrate increase in size of ≥5 mm in two years (20.3% vs. 10.9%; P = 0.049), and develop advanced neoplasia (24.6% vs. 0.5%; P <0.00001).

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic cysts <20 mm have a low risk of developing WF and HRS and surveillance interval may be lengthened.

Pancreatic Cysts Greater Than 1 cm Are Associated With an Increased Risk for Developing Pancreatic Cancer in Individuals From Pancreatic-Cancer Prone Kindreds Undergoing Surveillance

BACKGROUND

The International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening Consortium recommended annual imaging for individuals at increased risk for developing a pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who did not have concerning pancreatic findings or a cyst <3 cm without worrisome features. We aimed to determine if 3-cm cyst size accurately predicted advanced precursor lesions in high-risk individuals undergoing surveillance.

METHODS

Imaging for high-risk individuals (HRIs) undergoing PDAC surveillance from 2007 to 2021 was reviewed and pancreatic abnormalities were recorded including dominant cyst size and number of cysts. Subjects were excluded if they had the following: (1) no follow-up imaging after baseline, (2) solid lesion at baseline, or (3) development of solid lesion without having cyst on prior imaging.

RESULTS

Five of the 77 HRIs found to have a cystic lesion on surveillance developed a PDAC: 3 with cystic lesion >1 cm as compared with only 2 of 67 HRIs with cystic lesions <1 cm (P < 0.05). None of these cysts developed worrisome findings and 4/5 PDACs did not arise from visualized cystic precursor lesion.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a cyst ≥1 cm were at increased risk for developing PDAC compared with patients with cyst <1 cm. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma usually did not arise from a recognized cystic lesion.

The Deception of Pancreas Cyst Surveillance: A Case Study

Pancreatic cysts are a growing pandemic around the world. Intrapapillary mucinous neoplasms are the most common type of pancreatic cysts and given their premalignant nature, guidelines recommend surveillance. This case study and discussion addresses the five existing guidelines published to help clinicians manage patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and illustrates how, despite guidelines and close surveillance, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms can transform into pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

The Hong Kong consensus recommendations on the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cystic lesions

Background

The finding of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) on incidental imaging is becoming increasingly common. International studies report a prevalence of 2.2-44.7% depending on the population, imaging modality and indication for imaging, and the prevalence increases with age. Patients with PCL are at risk of developing pancreatic cancer, a disease with a poor prognosis. This publication summarizes recommendations for the diagnosis and management of PCL and post-operative pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) from a group of local specialists.

Methods

Clinical evidence was consolidated from narrative reviews and consensus statements formulated during two online meetings in March 2022. The expert panel included gastroenterologists, hepatobiliary surgeons, oncologists, radiologists, and endocrinologists.

Results

Patients with PCL require careful investigation and follow-up due to the risk of malignant transformation of these lesions. They should undergo clinical investigation and pancreas-specific imaging to classify lesions and understand the risk profile of the patient. Where indicated, patients should undergo pancreatectomy to excise PCL. Following pancreatectomy, patients are at risk of PEI, leading to gastrointestinal dysfunction and malnutrition. Therefore, such patients should be monitored for symptoms of PEI, and promptly treated with pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT). Patients with poor response to PERT may require increases in dose, addition of a proton pump inhibitor, and/or further investigation, including tests for pancreatic function. Patients are also at risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus after pancreatectomy; they should be screened and treated with insulin if indicated.

Conclusions

These statements are an accurate summary of our approach to the diagnosis and management of patients with PCL and will be of assistance to clinicians treating these patients in a similar clinical landscape.

Glycemic Abnormalities in Pancreatic Cystic Lesions—A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

Background and Objectives: Glucose metabolism alterations are very common in solid pancreatic lesions, particularly in pancreatic cancer. Similarly, diabetes and especially new-onset diabetes (NOD) have been associated with the malignant transformation of pancreatic cysts. We aimed to assess the prevalence and relevant associations of glycemic abnormalities in pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) in a retrospective analysis. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively recruited all patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound for a PCL over a period of 36 months (January 2018 to December 2021). Final diagnosis was set by means of tissue acquisition, surgery, follow-up, or board decision. Demographic and clinical data, laboratory workup, and imaging features were extracted from the patients’ charts according to a predefined protocol. We considered fasting blood glucose (FBG) and HbA1c values and stratified the patients as nondiabetic (FBG ≤ 99 mg/dL, HbA1c ≤ 5.6%, no history of glycemic abnormalities), prediabetic (FBG 100–125 mg/dL, HbA1c 5.7–6.4%), or diabetic (long-lasting diabetes or NOD). Results: Altogether, 81 patients were included, with a median age of 66 years, and 54.3% of them were male. The overall prevalence of fasting hyperglycemia was 54.3%, comprising 34.6% prediabetes and 22.2% diabetes, of which 16.7% had NOD. The mean FBG and HbA1c levels were higher in malignant and premalignant PCLs (intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN), cystadenocarcinoma, and cystic neuroendocrine tumor) compared to the benign lesions (pseudocysts, walled-off necrosis, and serous cystadenoma): 117.0 mg/dL vs. 108.3 mg/dL and 6.1% vs. 5.5%, respectively. Conclusions: Hyperglycemia and diabetes are common in PCLs, with a high prevalence in premalignant and malignant cysts. Screening and follow-up for glycemic abnormalities should be routinely conducted for PCLs, as they can contribute to a tailored risk assessment of cysts.

Glycemic Abnormalities in Pancreatic Cystic Lesions—A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

Background and Objectives: Glucose metabolism alterations are very common in solid pancreatic lesions, particularly in pancreatic cancer. Similarly, diabetes and especially new-onset diabetes (NOD) have been associated with the malignant transformation of pancreatic cysts. We aimed to assess the prevalence and relevant associations of glycemic abnormalities in pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) in a retrospective analysis. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively recruited all patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound for a PCL over a period of 36 months (January 2018 to December 2021). Final diagnosis was set by means of tissue acquisition, surgery, follow-up, or board decision. Demographic and clinical data, laboratory workup, and imaging features were extracted from the patients’ charts according to a predefined protocol. We considered fasting blood glucose (FBG) and HbA1c values and stratified the patients as nondiabetic (FBG ≤ 99 mg/dL, HbA1c ≤ 5.6%, no history of glycemic abnormalities), prediabetic (FBG 100–125 mg/dL, HbA1c 5.7–6.4%), or diabetic (long-lasting diabetes or NOD). Results: Altogether, 81 patients were included, with a median age of 66 years, and 54.3% of them were male. The overall prevalence of fasting hyperglycemia was 54.3%, comprising 34.6% prediabetes and 22.2% diabetes, of which 16.7% had NOD. The mean FBG and HbA1c levels were higher in malignant and premalignant PCLs (intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN), cystadenocarcinoma, and cystic neuroendocrine tumor) compared to the benign lesions (pseudocysts, walled-off necrosis, and serous cystadenoma): 117.0 mg/dL vs. 108.3 mg/dL and 6.1% vs. 5.5%, respectively. Conclusions: Hyperglycemia and diabetes are common in PCLs, with a high prevalence in premalignant and malignant cysts. Screening and follow-up for glycemic abnormalities should be routinely conducted for PCLs, as they can contribute to a tailored risk assessment of cysts.

Approach to Cystic Lesions of the Pancreas: Review of Literature

Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) have a wide range of demographical, clinical, morphological and histological characteristics. The distinction between these lesions is of paramount importance due to the risk of malignancy in specific categories of PCL. Considering the malignant potential for pancreatic cystic neoplasm (PCN) lesions, guidelines have been made to balance unnecessary treatment and manage the progression to malignancy. Various surgical procedures can be done for PCN depending on the location and size of the cyst; pancreatoduodenectomy is done for PCN located in the head of the uncinate process, whereas distal pancreatectomy is done for PCN in the body or tail. In the neck and proximal body of the pancreas, less extensive resections such as central pancreatectomy can be performed. Active surveillance of PCN is typically offered to asymptomatic PCNs of subtype intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) and mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) without any concerning features. In recent years, numerous guidelines have been created to augment PCN diagnosis, classification and management. Despite this, the management of PCNs remains complex. Thus, discussions with multidisciplinary teams involving surgeons, gastroenterologists, pathologists, and radiologists are required to ensure optimum care for the patient.

Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms: Translating Guidelines into Clinical Practice

A combination of several factors, including the increasing use of cross-sectional imaging and an aging population, has led to pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) becoming the most detected incidental pancreatic lesions. Accurate diagnosis and risk stratification of PCLs is challenging. In the last decade, several evidence-based guidelines have been published addressing the diagnosis and management of PCLs. However, these guidelines cover different subsets of patients with PCLs and offer varying recommendations regarding diagnostic assessment, surveillance, and surgical resection. Further, recent studies comparing the accuracy of various guidelines have reported significant variations in the rate of missed cancer versus unnecessary surgical resections. In clinical practice, it is challenging to decide which guideline to follow specifically. This article reviews the varying recommendations of the major guidelines and results of comparative studies, provides an overview of newer modalities not included in the guidelines, and offers perspectives on translating the guidelines into clinical practice.

Pancreatic Cystic Tumors: A Single-Center Observational Study

Background and Objectives: The aim of the study was to analyze the prevalence and characteristics of pancreatic cystic tumors (PCTs). Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis of the medical records of 124 patients, 102 (69%) women and 46 (31%) men, who had undergone surgery for pancreatic cystic tumors in 2014-2018. Among 148 pancreatic cysts, 24 (16%) were non-neoplasmatic and 124 (84%) were neoplasmatic. The neoplasmatic cysts (n = 124) were included in our analysis. There were five main types of PCTs: IPMN (intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm) (n = 45), MCN (mucinous cystic neoplasm) (n = 30), SCN (serous cystic neoplasm) (n = 28), SPN (solid pseudopapillary neoplasm) (n = 8), and CPEN (cystic pancreatic endocrine neoplasm) (n = 8), as well as mixed-type tumors (n = 5). Results: A statistically significant dependency between PCT type and age was proven (p= 0.0001): IPMNs were observed in the older group of patients with an average age of 66.12 (40-79) years while SPNs were noted in the youngest group of patients with an average age of 36.22 (22-55) years. A statistically significant association between PCT type and gender (p = 0.0001) was found: IPMNs occurred among 24 (53.33%) men and 21 (46.6%) women. In the MCN and SPN groups, all patients were female (100%). Among the SCN group, the majority were women (27 (96.43%)), and there was only 1 (3.57%) man. A statistically significant dependency between PCT type and size was proven (p = 0.0007). The mean size of IPMNs was the smallest 2.95 (0.6-10 cm) and the mean size of MCNs was the largest 6.78 (1.5-19 cm). A statistically significant dependency between PCT type and tumor location was proven (p = 0.000238). The most frequent location of IPMN was the pancreatic head: 27 (60%). MCN was most frequently located in the pancreatic tail (18 (60%)). Most (10/28) SCNs were found in the pancreatic tail (10 (35.71%)). CPENs were most frequently located in the pancreatic tail (three (37.5%)) and pancreatic body and tail (three (37.5%)). SPNs were located commonly in the pancreatic head (five (62.5%)). The type of surgery depended on the tumor location. The most frequent surgery for IPMNs was pancreatoduodenectomy (44.4%), while for MCNs and SCNs, it was distal pancreatectomy (81%). The postoperative morbidity and mortality were 34.68% and 1.61%, respectively. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) was the most frequent (29%) complication. Conclusions: IPMN was the most frequent resected PCT in our material. A statistically significant association between the type of cyst and location within the pancreas, size, local lymph node involvement, and patient's age and sex was proved. POPF was the most frequent postoperative complication. In patients with PCTs, due to substantial postoperative morbidity, adequate patient selection, considering both the surgical risk as well as the long-term risk of malignant transformation, is very important during qualification for surgery.

Risk Assessment and Pancreatic Cancer: Diagnostic Management and Artificial Intelligence

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the deadliest cancers, and it is responsible for a number of deaths almost equal to its incidence. The high mortality rate is correlated with several explanations; the main one is the late disease stage at which the majority of patients are diagnosed. Since surgical resection has been recognised as the only curative treatment, a PC diagnosis at the initial stage is believed the main tool to improve survival. Therefore, patient stratification according to familial and genetic risk and the creation of screening protocol by using minimally invasive diagnostic tools would be appropriate. Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) are subsets of lesions which deserve special management to avoid overtreatment. The current PC screening programs are based on the annual employment of magnetic resonance imaging with cholangiopancreatography sequences (MR/MRCP) and/or endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). For patients unfit for MRI, computed tomography (CT) could be proposed, although CT results in lower detection rates, compared to MRI, for small lesions. The actual major limit is the incapacity to detect and characterize the pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) by EUS and MR/MRCP. The possibility of utilizing artificial intelligence models to evaluate higher-risk patients could favour the diagnosis of these entities, although more data are needed to support the real utility of these applications in the field of screening. For these motives, it would be appropriate to realize screening programs in research settings.

Impact of the transection plan on postoperative pancreatic fistulas occurring after robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy for nonmalignant pancreatic neoplasms

OBJECTIVES

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the main complication of distal pancreatectomy (DP) and affects the prognosis of patients. The impact of several clinical factors mentioned in recent studies on POPF remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the impact of a remnant pancreas and other perioperative factors on POPFs occurring after robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RDP) for nonmalignant pancreatic neoplasms.

METHODS

A total of 197 patients who received robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RDP) for nonmalignant pancreatic neoplasms at the Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine from January 2018 to December 2020 were included in this retrospective study. According to the intraoperative transection plan, patients were divided into an RDP body group and an RDP tail group. Clinical and pathological features and perioperative factors affecting POPF were analyzed and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The results showed that a transection plan involving the tail of the pancreas (OR = 2.133, 95% CI 1.109-4.103, p = 0.023) and spleen preservation (OR = 2.588, 95% CI 1.435-4.665, p = 0.001) independently increased the incidence of POPF in patients with nonmalignant pancreatic neoplasms treated by RDP. A transection plan involving the tail of the pancreas was also an independent risk factor (OR = 3.464, 95% CI 1.270-9.450, p = 0.015) for grade B/C POPF. Length of remnant pancreas > 6.23 cm was an independent risk factor for POPF (OR = 3.116, 95% CI 1.364-7.121, p = 0.007). Length of remnant pancreas > 9.82 cm was an independent risk factor for grade B/C POPF (OR = 3.340, 95% CI 1.386-8.051, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study suggests that a transection plan involving the tail of the pancreas is an independent risk factor for POPF in patients with nonmalignant neoplasms treated by RDP. We also propose that the postoperative length of the remnant pancreas evaluated by computed tomography scans can be used to identify patients with a high risk of POPF in order to optimize the individualized strategy.

Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: Review of the Current State of Diagnosis and Surveillance

Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are both common and often incidental. These encompass a range of pathologies with varying degrees of concern for malignancy. Although establishing a diagnosis is helpful for determining malignant potential, many PCLs are either too small to characterize or demonstrate nonspecific morphologic features. The most salient modalities involved in diagnosis and surveillance are magnetic resonance imaging, multidetector computerized tomography, and endoscopic ultrasound. Fine needle aspiration has a role in conjunction with molecular markers as a diagnostic tool, particularly for identifying malignant lesions. Although several major consensus guidelines exist internationally, there remains uncertainty in establishing the strength of the association between all PCLs and pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and in showing a benefit from extended periods of imaging surveillance. No consensus exists between the major guidelines, particularly regarding surveillance duration, frequency, or endpoints. This review paper discusses PCL subtypes, diagnosis, and compares the major consensus guidelines with considerations for local adaptability along with questions regarding current and future priorities for research.

Comparison of Preoperative Imaging Modalities for the Assessment of Malignant Potential of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A Network Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aims of this study are to compare the performance of various preoperative imaging modalities for assessing the malignant potential of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) through a network meta-analysis (NMA) and to clarify the role of 18 F-FDG PET in the management of patients with PCL.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for the studies evaluating the performance of preoperative imaging modalities for identifying malignant PCLs. The NMA was performed for 4 representative categories of various imaging modalities in terms of diagnostic performance for differentiating malignant from benign PCL and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms only as a subgroup analysis. To calculate the probability of each imaging modality being the most effective diagnostic method, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve values were obtained.

RESULTS

A total of 1018 patients from 17 direct comparison studies using 2 or more preoperative imaging modalities were included for differentiating malignant from benign PCL. The positive predictive value (PPV) and accuracy of 18 F-FDG PET were significantly higher than that of CT (PPV: odds ratio [OR], 2.66; 95% credible interval [CrI], 1.21-6.17; accuracy: OR, 2.63; 95% CrI, 1.41-5.38) or MRI (PPV: OR, 2.50; 95% CrI, 1.09-6.26; accuracy: OR, 2.50; 95% CrI, 1.28-5.47) in all PCLs, as well as in the subgroup analysis for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm only. 18 F-FDG PET showed the highest surface under the cumulative ranking curve values in all diagnostic performance areas of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, negative predictive value, and accuracy, followed by MRI or CT.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this NMA suggest that 18 F-FDG PET is the best preoperative imaging modality for differentiating malignant from benign PCLs and that it can be used for the preoperative evaluation of PCLs.

New-Onset Diabetes Is a Potential Marker for the Malignant Transformation of Pancreatic Cysts: A Real-World Population Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

New-onset diabetes mellitus has been shown to be associated with pancreatic cancer (PC) in the general population. Our objective was to leverage real-world data to assess the association of new-onset diabetes (NODM) with malignant transformation in a large longitudinal cohort of pancreatic cyst patients.

METHODS

A retrospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted using IBM's MarketScan claims databases from 2009 to 2017. From 200 million database subjects, we selected patients with newly diagnosed cysts without prior pancreatic pathology.

RESULTS

Of the 137,970 patients with a pancreatic cyst, 14,279 had a new diagnosis. Median follow-up was 41.6 months. Patients with NODM progressed to PC at nearly 3 times the rate of patients without a diabetes history (hazard ratio, 2.80; 95% confidence interval, 2.05-3.83) and at a significantly higher rate than patients with preexisting diabetes (hazard ratio, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.21). The mean interval between NODM and cancer diagnosis was 7.5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyst patients who developed NODM progressed to PC at 3 times the rate of nondiabetics and at a greater rate than preexisting diabetics. The diagnosis of NODM preceded cancer detection by several months. These results support the inclusion of diabetes mellitus screening in cyst surveillance algorithms.

Comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes between invasive IPMN and invasive MCN: A population-based analysis

Background

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) and mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) are two main histological subtypes of pancreatic cystic neoplasms with rapidly increasing incidence recently. The natural histories, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes of invasive IPMN and invasive MCN have not been well explored.

Methods

Patients with a diagnosis of invasive IPMN and invasive MCN in the SEER database from 2000 through 2018 were retrospectively identified. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was conducted to determine the independent risk factors associated with overall survival (OS). Subgroup analyses of survival outcomes for invasive IPMN and invasive MCN were conducted. The OS for invasive IPMN was compared between patients who underwent surgery alone and those who received surgery plus chemotherapy by propensity score matching (PSM).

Results

A total of 2,505 patients were included, of whom 2,300 were diagnosed with invasive IPMN and 205 were diagnosed with invasive MCN. Half of the invasive IPMN (48.4%) and three-quarters of the invasive MCN (76.1%) patients were female. Of all patients, both the OS and cancer-specific survival were significantly better in the invasive MCN cohort compared to the invasive IPMN cohort. In subgroup analyses, while invasive MCN experienced better OS compared to invasive IPMN in the subgroups of patients with local–regional disease, the survival advantages disappeared in patients at a distant stage. In addition, surgery plus chemotherapy in invasive IPMN patients was associated with significantly better survival compared to surgery alone after PSM.

Conclusion

We examined the demographic and clinical characteristics between invasive IPMN and invasive MCN patients using a large-population-based analysis. Although the OS is significantly better for invasive MCN versus invasive IPMN, the difference disappeared in patients with distant disease. A combination of surgery and chemotherapy in selected invasive IPMN patients could confer survival benefits compared to surgery alone.

Cystic Lesions of the Pancreas: Is Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value Useful at 3 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging?

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to determine the role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value at 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the characterization of pancreatic cystic lesions.

METHODS

We retrospectively selected a total number of 223 patients with a conclusive diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesion, previously undergoing MR examination on a 3 T system. The MRI protocol first included axial T1/T2-weighted sequences and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Diffusion-weighted MRI was performed using a spin-echo echo-planar sequence with multiple b values (0, 150, 500, 1000, and 1500 s/mm2) in all diffusion directions, obtaining an ADC map. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences were performed during the initial work-up of a pancreatic cystic lesion and when signs of malignancy were suspected during the MRI follow-up. The ADC value of each pancreatic lesion was measured using a monoexponential curve fitting with all the multiple b.

RESULTS

The final diagnosis of our study group included the following: serous cystadenomas (n = 42), mucinous cystadenomas (n = 14), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) (n = 121), IPMNs with signs of malignancy at histopathologic examination (n = 24), pseudocysts (n = 9), other cystic lesions (n = 13). A statistically significant difference was observed between the ADC values of malignant IPMNs and those of each other group of pancreatic lesions (P < 0.001). The ADC value of benign IPMN was significantly higher than that of serous cystadenomas (P = 0.024). A statistically significant difference was observed between the ADCs of all mucinous cystic tumors (benign IPMNs together to mucinous cystadenomas) and the ADCs of serous cystadenomas (P = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Fitted ADC value obtained at 3T MRI may be helpful in the characterization of pancreatic cystic lesions with particular regards of differential diagnosis between mucinous and serous cystic tumors and between malignant and benign IPMNs.

Standardization of EUS imaging and reporting in high-risk individuals of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: consensus statement of the Pancreatic Cancer Early Detection Consortium

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is an aggressive disease most often diagnosed after local progression or metastatic dissemination, precluding resection and resulting in a high mortality rate. For individuals with elevated personal risk of the development of pancreatic cancer, EUS is a frequently used advanced imaging and diagnostic modality. However, variability in the expertise and definition of EUS findings exists among gastroenterologists, as well as a lack of standardized reporting of relevant findings at the time of examination. Adoption of standardized EUS reporting, using a universally accepted and agreed on terminology, is needed.

METHODS

A consensus statement designed to create a standardized reporting template was authored by a multidisciplinary group of experts in pancreatic diseases that includes gastroenterologists, radiologists, surgeons, oncologists, and geneticists. This statement was developed using a modified Delphi process as part of the Pancreatic Cancer Early Detection Consortium, and >75% agreement was required to reach consensus.

RESULTS

We identified reporting elements and present standardized reporting templates for EUS indications, procedural data, EUS image capture, and descriptors of findings, tissue sampling, and postprocedural assessment of adequacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Adoption of this standardized EUS reporting template should improve consistency in clinical decision-making for individuals with elevated risk of pancreatic cancer by providing complete and accurate reporting of pancreatic abnormalities. Standardization will also help to facilitate research and clinical trial design by using clearly defined and consistent imaging descriptions, thus allowing for comparison of results across different centers.

Utility of gadolinium for identifying the malignant potential of pancreatic cystic lesions

PURPOSE

To determine if gadolinium is necessary for the diagnosis of a pancreatic cystic lesion (PCL) as benign or malignant by assessing inter- and intra-observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy for the presence of worrisome features/high-risk stigmata on non-contrast MRI compared to MRI with and without contrast, with cytopathology as a reference standard.

METHODS

The institutional database was searched to identify consecutive patients that underwent EUS/FNA or surgical resection of an asymptomatic PCL performed from 01/01/2015 to 01/01/2019. Two abdominal radiologists independently evaluated PCLs on MRI with all sequences except for contrast-enhanced sequences followed by a second reading with data from the entire MRI including pre- and post-contrast sequences. Cyst size, growth, and the presence of worrisome features/high-risk stigmata were assessed for each cyst on both datasets.

RESULTS

There were 87 patients with 87 pancreatic cysts; 76(87.4%) were benign and 11 (12.7%) were malignant. The presence of any worrisome features/high-risk stigmata for reader 1 was concordant on both MRIs in 95.4% (83/87; k = 0.874) of cases and for reader 2 was concordant in 96.6% (84/87; k = 0.920) of cases. The diagnostic accuracy of the two datasets when the presence of any worrisome feature/high-risk stigmata was predictive of malignancy was identical for reader 1 (AUC = 0.622 for both; p = 1.0) and similar for reader 2 (AUC 0.569 and 0.589; p = 0.08) for both MRI datasets.

CONCLUSION

The addition of gadolinium had no significant impact in the diagnosis of a benign versus malignant PCL, with similar intra-observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy for both readers when using contrast-enhanced and unenhanced MRI datasets.

Pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: Current diagnosis and management

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) represent approximately 1% of all pancreatic neoplasms and 25% of cystic neoplasms. They are divided into three types: main duct-IPMN (MD-IPPMN), branch duct-IPMN (BD-IPMN), and mixed type-IPMN. In this review, diagnostics, including clinical presentation and radiological investigations, were described. Magnetic resonance imaging is the most useful for most IPMNs. Management depends on the type and radiological features of IPMNs. Surgery is recommended for MD-IPMN. For BD-IPMN, management involves surgery or surveillance depending on the tumor size, cyst growth rate, solid components, main duct dilatation, high-grade dysplasia in cytology, the presence of symptoms (jaundice, new-onset diabetes, pancreatitis), and CA 19.9 serum level. The patient’s age and comorbidities should also be taken into consideration. Currently, there are different guidelines regarding the diagnosis and management of IPMNs. In this review, the following guidelines were presented: Sendai International Association of Pancreatology guidelines (2006), American Gastroenterological Association guidelines, revised international consensus Fukuoka guidelines (2012), revised international consensus Fukuoka guidelines (2017), and European evidence-based guidelines according to the European Study Group on Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas (2018). The Verona Evidence-Based Meeting 2020 was also presented and discussed.

Pancreatic Cystic Lesions and Malignancy: Assessment, Guidelines, and the Field Defect

The widespread use of high-spatial-resolution cross-sectional imaging has led to an increase in detection of incidental pancreatic cystic lesions. These lesions are a diverse group, ranging from indolent and premalignant lesions to invasive cancers. The diagnosis of several of these lesions can be suggested on the basis of their imaging appearance, while many other lesions require follow-up imaging and/or aspiration. The smaller cystic lesions, often branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, have overlapping imaging characteristics that make diagnostic assessment of the natural history and malignancy risk confusing. Expert panels have developed societal guidelines, based on a consensus, for surveillance of these lesions. However, these guidelines are often inconsistent and are constantly evolving as additional scientific data are accumulated. Identification of features associated with increased risk of malignancy is important for proper management. The concept of field defect, whereby pancreatic adenocarcinoma develops at a site different from the site of the pancreatic cyst, adds to the complexity of screening guidelines. As a result of the differences in guidelines, key stakeholders (eg, radiologists, gastroenterologists, and surgeons) must review and come to a consensus regarding which guideline, or combination of guidelines, to follow at their individual institutions. Standardized reporting and macros are helpful for ensuring the uniformity of interpretations. Radiologists play a critical role in the detection and characterization of pancreatic cystic lesions, in the follow-up recommendations for these lesions, and in the detection of associated cancer. An invited commentary by Zaheer is available online. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Non-inflammatory pancreatic cysts: from diagnosis to treatment (97 cases series)

OBJECTIVE

to describe the implications of the diagnosis and treatment of non-inflammatory pancreatic cysts in a series of patients.

METHODS

we included patients with pancreatic cysts ≥1.0 cm, excluding those with a presumptive diagnosis of a pseudocyst. Imaging tests, echoendoscopy, and histopathology determined the diagnosis of the type of cyst. We applied the guidelines of the International Association of Pancreatology, with some modifications, in patients with mucinous or indeterminate lesions.

RESULTS

97 adult patients participated in the study. A cystic neoplasm of the pancreas was diagnosed in 82.5% of cases. Diagnosis was mainly made by magnetic resonance (46% of cases). The two most common diagnoses were intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (43.3%) and serous cystadenoma (26%). Twenty-nine patients underwent surgery (33.3%). The most common surgical procedure was distal pancreatectomy associated with splenectomy in 19 cases (65.5%). Among the operated patients, 11 were diagnosed with cancer. None of the followed, non-operated patients had a diagnosis of cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

magnetic resonance showed good accuracy, particularly in the diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. The guidelines of the International Association of Pancreatology, as applied in this study, showed a negative predictive value for cancer of 100%. A development of better diagnostic tests can reduce the number of unnecessary operations.

Co-analysis of pancreatic cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen and glucose with novel cut-off levels better distinguishes between mucinous and non-mucinous neoplastic pancreatic cystic lesions

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cyst fluid analysis plays an important role in distinguishing between mucinous and non-mucinous cyst lesions. We aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA 19-9, and glucose in differentiating mucinous from non-mucinous neoplastic pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) and determine the best cut-off levels.

METHODS

Patients' data were evaluated retrospectively. 102 patients' PCLs were grouped as non-neoplastic (n = 25), non-mucinous neoplastic (n = 20), mucinous neoplastic (n = 47) and pancreatic adenocarcinomas with cystic degeneration (n = 10); and CEA, CA 19-9, and glucose levels were compared. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed, and the ideal cut-off values were determined.

RESULTS

Cyst fluid CEA and CA 19-9, levels were significantly higher (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively) and glucose levels were significantly lower (P = 0.001) in mucinous than in non-mucinous neoplastic PCLs. Area under curve with 95% confidence interval of CEA, glucose and CEA and glucose test combination was 0.939 (95% CI = 0.885-0.993, P = 0.001), 0.809 (95% CI = 0.695-0.924, P < 0.001) and 0.937 (95% CI = 0.879-0.995), respectively. CEA cut-offs to rule-in and rule-out mucinous neoplastic were 135.1 ng/mL (sensitivity = 62%, specificity = 94.7%) and 6.12 ng/mL (sensitivity = 94.1%, specificity = 80.4%), respectively. Glucose cut-off of 2.8 mmol/L was chosen both to rule-in and rule-out mucinous neoplastic PCLs (sensitivity = 78%, specificity = 80%). Co-analysis of CEA and glucose to distinguish mucinous from non-mucinous neoplastic PCLs had sensitivity = 87.8%, specificity = 93.3%, and diagnostic accuracy = 89.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that co-analysis of cyst fluid CEA (cut-off = 135.1 ng/mL) and glucose (cut-off = 2.8 mmol/L) at novel cut-offs had the best testing performance to rule-in mucinous neoplastic PCLs. To rule-out mucinous PCLs co-analysis of CEA (cut-off = 6.12 ng/mL) and glucose (cut-off = 2.8 mmol/L) added value to prediction.

Comparing accuracy of high-risk features for detecting advanced neoplasia in pancreatic cystic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The American Gastroenterological Association recommends endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for evaluating pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) with ≥2 high-risk features (HRF), whereas the American College of Gastroenterology recommends EUS for ≥1 HRF. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the diagnostic accuracy of using ≥1 vs. ≥2 HRF for assessing the risk of advanced neoplasia (AN) and performing EUS in PCL.

Methods

An electronic database search was performed for eligible studies. AN was defined as pancreatic adenocarcinoma, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm or mucinous cystadenoma with high-grade dysplasia, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. HRF included cyst size ≥3 cm, solid component, and dilated pancreatic duct ≥5 mm. The primary outcome was the sensitivity and specificity of using ≥1 vs. ≥2 HRF as an indication for EUS to detect AN in PCL.

Results

Of 38 studies initially screened, 8 were included in the final analysis. Seven studies assessed the accuracy of ≥2 HRF and 4 studies assessed ≥1 HRF. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of EUS for detecting AN were 41.7% (95% confidence interval 19.5-67.8%), 90.8% (81.9-95.5%), 30.4% (19.4-44.2%) and 94.3% (89.6-97.0%) with ≥2HRFs, and 77.1% (66.1-85.3%), 72.7% (50.4-87.5%), 17.95% (10.3-29.4%), 98.1% (90.8-99.6%), respectively, with ≥1 HRF.

Conclusion

Performing EUS for PCL with ≥1 HRF could offer greater sensitivity in detecting AN compared to ≥2 HRF, with a similar negative predictive value.

Pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a review of current recommendations for surveillance and management

Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) comprise of a diverse array of pancreatic cysts, including intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN), serous cystic neoplasms (SCN), cystic neuroendocrine tumors (cNET), and many others. Increasing use of cross-sectional imaging has resulted in greater numbers of PCNs discovered incidentally. The overall risk of malignancy is low, but can vary considerably between different classes of PCNs. Furthermore, many pancreatic cysts are indeterminate on imaging, and the inability to reliably predict the course of disease remains a challenge for radiologists. Due to the variability in disease course and a lack of high-quality studies on PCNs, there is no universal consensus when it comes to balancing optimal surveillance while avoiding the risk for overtreatment. Currently, there are three widely accepted international guidelines outlining guidelines for surveillance and management of PCNs: the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) in 2015, the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) last revised in 2017, and the European Study Group on Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas (European) last revised in 2018. In 2017, the American College of Radiology released its own comprehensive set of recommendations for managing indeterminate pancreatic cysts that are detected incidentally on CT or MRI. The purpose of this paper is to describe the key differences between the ACR recommendations and the aforementioned three sets of guidelines regarding cyst management, imaging surveillance, performance, and cost-effectiveness.

Application of CT-Based Radiomics in Discriminating Pancreatic Cystadenomas From Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Using Machine Learning Methods

Objectives

The purpose of this study aimed at investigating the reliability of radiomics features extracted from contrast-enhanced CT in differentiating pancreatic cystadenomas from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) using machine-learning methods.

Methods

In this study, a total number of 120 patients, including 66 pancreatic cystadenomas patients and 54 PNETs patients were enrolled. Forty-eight radiomic features were extracted from contrast-enhanced CT images using LIFEx software. Five feature selection methods were adopted to determine the appropriate features for classifiers. Then, nine machine learning classifiers were employed to build predictive models. The performance of the forty-five models was evaluated with area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score in the testing group.

Results

The predictive models exhibited reliable ability of differentiating pancreatic cystadenomas from PNETs when combined with suitable selection methods. A combination of DC as the selection method and RF as the classifier, as well as Xgboost+RF, demonstrated the best discriminative ability, with the highest AUC of 0.997 in the testing group.

Conclusions

Radiomics-based machine learning methods might be a noninvasive tool to assist in differentiating pancreatic cystadenomas and PNETs.

Pancreatic cyst characterization: maximum axial diameter does not measure up

BACKGROUND

Unidimensional size is commonly used to risk stratify pancreatic cysts (PCs) despite inconsistent performance. The current study aimed to determine if unidimensional size, demonstrated by maximum axial diameter (MAD), is an appropriate surrogate measurement for volume and surface area.

METHODS

Patients with cross-sectional imaging of PCs from 2012 to 2013 were identified. Cyst MAD, volume, and surface area were measured using quantitative imaging software. Non-pseudocystic PCs >1 cm were selected for inclusion to assess MAD correlation with volume and surface area. Cysts imaged twice >1 year apart were selected to evaluate volumetric growth rate.

RESULTS

In total, 195 cysts were included. Overall, MAD was strongly correlated with volume (r = 0.83) and surface area (r = 0.93). However, cysts 1-2 cm and 2-3 cm were weakly correlated with volume and surface area: r = 0.78, 0.57 and 0.82, 0.61, respectively. Cyst volumes and surface areas varied widely within unidimensional size groups with 51% and 40% of volumes and surface areas overlapping unidimensional size groups, respectively. Estimated changes in volume poorly predicted measured changes in volume with 42% of cysts having >100% absolute percent difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic cyst volume and surface area may be useful adjunct measurements to risk stratify patients and surveil cyst changes and deserves further study.

Variation in Radiologists' Follow-Up Imaging Recommendations for Small Cystic Pancreatic Lesions

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the incidence, identify imaging and patient factors, and measure individual radiologist variation associated with follow-up recommendations for small focal cystic pancreatic lesions (FCPLs), a common incidental imaging finding.

METHODS

This institutional review board-approved retrospective study analyzed 146,709 reports from abdominal CTs and MRIs performed in a large academic hospital from July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2018. A trained natural language processing tool identified 4,345 reports with FCPLs, which were manually reviewed to identify those containing one or more <1.5-cm pancreatic cysts. For these patients, patient, lesion, and radiologist features and follow-up recommendations for FCPL were extracted. A nonlinear random-effects model estimated degree of variation in follow-up recommendations across radiologists at department and division levels.

RESULTS

Of 2,872 reports with FCPLs < 1.5 cm, 708 (24.7%) had FCPL-related follow-up recommendations. Average patient age was 67 years (SD ± 11). In all, 1,721 (60.0%) reports were for female patients; 59.3% of patients had only one cyst. In multivariable analysis, older patients had slightly lower follow-up recommendation rates (odds ratio [OR]: 0.98 [0.98-1.00] per additional year), and lesions associated with main duct dilatation and septation were more likely to have a follow-up recommendation (ORs: 1.93 [1.11-3.36] and 2.88 [1.89-4.38], respectively). Radiologist years in practice (P = .51), trainee presence (P = .21), and radiologist gender (P = .52) were not associated with increased follow-up recommendations. There was significant interradiologist variation in the Abdominal Imaging Division (P = .04), but not in Emergency Radiology (P = .31) or Cancer Imaging Divisions (P = .29).

DISCUSSION

Interradiologist variation significantly contributes to variability in follow-up imaging recommendations for FCPLs.

Large-duct pattern invasive adenocarcinoma of the pancreas–a variant mimicking pancreatic cystic neoplasms: A minireview

Pancreatic cancer currently has no subtypes that inform clinical decisions; hence, there exists an opportunity to rearrange the morphological and molecular taxonomy that guides a better understanding of tumor characteristics. Nonetheless, accumulating studies to date have revealed the large-duct type variant, a unique subtype of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) with cystic features. This subtype often radiographically mimics intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) and involves multiple small cysts occasionally associated with solid masses. The “bunch-of-grapes” sign, an imaging characteristic of IPMNs, is absent in large-duct PDA. Large-duct PDA defines the mucin profile, and genetic alterations are useful in distinguishing large-duct PDA from IPMNs. Histologically, neoplastic ducts measure over 0.5 mm, forming large ductal elements. Similar to classic PDAs, this subtype is frequently accompanied by perineural invasion and abundant desmoplastic reactions, and KRAS mutations in codon 12 are nearly ubiquitous. Despite such morphological similarities with IPMNs, the prognosis of large-duct PDA is equivalent to that of classic PDA. Differential diagnosis is therefore essential.

CT-Based Radiomics Analysis for Preoperative Diagnosis of Pancreatic Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm and Atypical Serous Cystadenomas

Objectives

To investigate the value of CT-based radiomics analysis in preoperatively discriminating pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) and atypical serous cystadenomas (ASCN).

Methods

A total of 103 MCN and 113 ASCN patients who underwent surgery were retrospectively enrolled. A total of 764 radiomics features were extracted from preoperative CT images. The optimal features were selected by Mann-Whitney U test and minimum redundancy and maximum relevance method. The radiomics score (Rad-score) was then built using random forest algorithm. Radiological/clinical features were also assessed for each patient. Multivariable logistic regression was used to construct a radiological model. The performance of the Rad-score and the radiological model was evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation for area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy.

Results

Ten screened optimal features were identified and the Rad-score was then built based on them. The radiological model was built based on four radiological/clinical factors. In the 10-fold cross-validation, the Rad-score was proved to be robust and reliable (average AUC: 0.784, sensitivity: 0.847, specificity: 0.745, PPV: 0.767, NPV: 0.849, accuracy: 0.793). The radiological model performed slightly less well in classification (average AUC: average AUC: 0.734 sensitivity: 0.748, specificity: 0.705, PPV: 0.732, NPV: 0.798, accuracy: 0.728.

Conclusions

The CT-based radiomics analysis provided promising performance for preoperatively discriminating MCN from ASCN and showed good potential in improving diagnostic power, which may serve as a novel tool for guiding clinical decision-making for these patients.

Automated Detection of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions on CT Using Deep Learning

Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) are a frequent and underreported incidental finding on CT scans and can transform into neoplasms with devastating consequences. We developed and evaluated an algorithm based on a two-step nnU-Net architecture for automated detection of PCL on CTs. A total of 543 cysts on 221 abdominal CTs were manually segmented in 3D by a radiology resident in consensus with a board-certified radiologist specialized in abdominal radiology. This information was used to train a two-step nnU-Net for detection with the performance assessed depending on lesions' volume and location in comparison to three human readers of varying experience. Mean sensitivity was 78.8 ± 0.1%. The sensitivity was highest for large lesions with 87.8% for cysts ≥220 mm³ and for lesions in the distal pancreas with up to 96.2%. The number of false-positive detections for cysts ≥220 mm³ was 0.1 per case. The algorithm's performance was comparable to human readers. To conclude, automated detection of PCL on CTs is feasible. The proposed model could serve radiologists as a second reading tool. All imaging data and code used in this study are freely available online.

Society of Abdominal Radiology Disease Focused Panel Survey on Clinical Utilization of Incidental Pancreatic Cyst Management Recommendations and Template Reporting

OBJECTIVE

To assess current practice patterns with respect to protocols used for incidental pancreatic cyst follow-up, management guidelines, and template reporting.

METHODS

The Society of Abdominal Radiology Disease Focused Panel on intraductal pancreatic neoplasms distributed an anonymous 14-question survey to its members in June 2018 that focused on current utilization of incidental pancreatic cyst guidelines, protocols, and template reporting.

RESULTS

Among the 1,390 email invitations, 323 responded, and 94.7% (306 of 323) completed all questions. Respondents were mainly radiologists (93.8%, 303 of 323) from academic institutions (74.7%, 227 of 304) in North America (93.7%, 286 of 305). Of respondents, 42.5% (136 of 320) preferred 2017 ACR recommendations, 17.8% (57 of 320) homegrown systems, 15.0% (48 of 320) Fukuoka guidelines, and 7.8% (25 of 320) American Gastroenterological Association guidelines. The majority (68.7%, 222 of 323) agreed or strongly agreed that developing a single international consensus recommendation for management was important, and most radiologists preferred to include them in reports (231 of 322, 71.7%); yet only half included recommendations in >75% of reports (161 of 321). MR cholangiopancreatography was the modality of choice for follow-up of <2.5 cm cysts. Intravenous contrast was routinely used by 69.7% (212 of 304). Standardized reporting templates were rarely used in practice (12.8% 39 of 306).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 7 of 10 radiologists desire a unified international consensus recommendation for management of incidental cystic pancreatic lesions; ACR 2017 recommendations are most commonly used, followed by homegrown systems and Fukuoka guidelines. The majority of radiologists routinely use MR cholangiopancreatography with intravenous contrast for follow-up of incidental cystic lesions, but template reporting is rarely used.

Predictive Factors for Pancreatic Cancer and Its Early Detection Using Special Pancreatic Ultrasonography in High-Risk Individuals

Because pancreatic cancer has a dismal prognosis, a strategy for early diagnosis is required. This study aimed to identify predictive factors of neoplastic progression in patients at high risk for pancreatic cancer and examined the efficiency of surveillance using transabdominal special ultrasonography focusing on the pancreas (special pancreatic US). Patients with slight main pancreatic duct (MPD) dilatation (≥2.5 mm) and/or pancreatic cysts (≥5 mm) were enrolled in a prospective surveillance study with special pancreatic US in a Japanese cancer referral center. A total of 498 patients undergoing surveillance for ≥3 years were included. During the median follow-up of 5.9 years, neoplastic progression developed in 11 patients (2.2%), including 9 patients who underwent pancreatectomy. Eight patients (72.7%) were diagnosed with stage 0/I disease, with an overall survival duration of 8.8 years. Findings of both MPD dilatation and pancreatic cysts at initial surveillance, MPD growth (≥0.2 mm/year) and cyst growth (≥2 mm/year) during surveillance were identified as independent risk factors for neoplastic progression. In summary, surveillance with special pancreatic US for high-risk individuals contributed to earlier detection of neoplastic progression, leading to a favorable prognosis. During surveillance, attention should be paid to MPD growth as well as to cyst growth.

New onset diabetes predicts progression of low risk pancreatic mucinous cysts

BACKGROUND

Patients with low-risk lesions require ongoing surveillance since the rate of progression to pancreatic cancer (PC), while small, is much greater than in the general population. Our objective was to study the relationship between new onset diabetes (NODM) and progression in patients with low risk mucinous cysts.

METHODS

We evaluated a prospectively maintained cohort of 442 patients with a suspected mucinous cyst without worrisome features (WF) or high-risk stigmata (HRS). Multivariable Cox models were developed for progression to WF and HRS, with diabetes status formulated as both time independent and dependent covariates. The adjusted cumulative risk of progression was calculated using the corrected group prognosis method.

RESULTS

The 5-year cumulative progression rates to WFs and HRS were 12.8 and 3.6%, respectively. After controlling for other risk factors, the development of NODM was strongly associated with progression to HRS (HR = 11.6; 95%CI, 3.5-57.7%), but not WF. Among patients with the smallest cysts (<10 mm) at baseline, those who developed NODM had a 5-year adjusted cumulative risk of progression to HRS of 8.6% (95%CI, 0.0%-20.2%), compared to only 0.8% (95%CI, 0.0%-2.3%) for patients without NODM. Among patients with the largest cysts (20-29 mm), those who developed NODM during surveillance had a 5-year adjusted cumulative risk of progression of 53.5% (95%CI, 19.6%-89.9%) compared to only 7.5% (95%CI, 1.6%-15.2%) for patients without NODM.

CONCLUSION

New onset diabetes may predict progression in patients with low risk mucinous cysts. Pending validation with large-scale studies, these findings support regular diabetes screening among patients surveilled for suspected IPMNs or MCNs.

CT-Based Radiomics Analysis to Predict Malignancy in Patients with Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm (IPMN) of the Pancreas

To assess the performance of CT-based radiomics analysis in differentiating benign from malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas (IPMN), preoperative scans of 408 resected patients with IPMN were retrospectively analyzed. IPMNs were classified as benign (low-grade dysplasia, n = 181), or malignant (high grade, n = 128, and invasive, n = 99). Clinicobiological data were reported. Patients were divided into a training cohort (TC) of 296 patients and an external validation cohort (EVC) of 112 patients. After semi-automatic tumor segmentation, PyRadiomics was used to extract radiomics features. A multivariate model was developed using a logistic regression approach. In the training cohort, 85/107 radiomics features were significantly different between patients with benign and malignant IPMNs. Unsupervised clustering analysis revealed four distinct clusters of patients with similar radiomics features patterns with malignancy as the most significant association. The multivariate model differentiated benign from malignant tumors in TC with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.84, sensitivity (Se) of 0.82, specificity (Spe) of 0.74, and in EVC with an AUC of 0.71, Se of 0.69, Spe of 0.57. This large study confirms the high diagnostic performance of preoperative CT-based radiomics analysis to differentiate between benign from malignant IPMNs.

Diagnostic approaches for pancreatic cystic lesions

BACKGROUND

Cystic lesions of the pancreas (PCLs) may be inflammatory or proliferative and making an accurate and timely pre-operative diagnosis remains a significant clinical challenge. This is principally due to the heterogeneity of the pathological processes involved. PCLs constitute an entity with diverse histology and although infrequent, the possible potential for malignant transformation of these lesions and the opportunity for curative surgery mandates that our diagnostic approaches are up to date and evidence based. In addition, improved diagnostic accuracy is crucial to prevent unnecessary surgical procedures with the inevitable associated morbidity.

METHODS

This narrative review examines the current diagnostic benchmarks and identifies novel diagnostic techniques that warrant further consideration, a number of which are beginning to be included in routine clinical practice when these PCLs are being investigated. A computerized search was made of MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed using the search words 'diagnostic approaches to pancreatic cystic lesions'. All relevant articles in English language or with an English abstract were retrieved and additionally cross referenced.

CONCLUSION

The increasing accuracy of available imaging techniques together with the wider availability of endoluminal ultrasound and the development of additional novel methods to assess PCLs presents an opportunity to significantly improve the pre-operative diagnosis rate. This is essential to classify the type of PCL and hence guide the management particularly with lesions where there is a likelihood of progression to more serious pathology. We have highlighted the need for a comprehensive and standardized algorithm for the diagnosis and management of PCLs.

Role of Cross-sectional Imaging (CT/MRI) in Characterization and Distinguishing Benign from Malignant/Potentially Malignant Cystic Lesions of Pancreas

Objectives:

The aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) in characterizing cystic lesions of the pancreas and in differentiating between benign and malignant/potentially malignant lesions.

Material and Methods:

A retrospective study was performed on patients with pancreatic cystic lesions who underwent pre-operative imaging and surgery between October 2004 and April 2017 at a tertiary care teaching hospital. The images were reviewed for specific characteristics and diagnoses recorded independently by two radiologists who were blinded to the histopathological examination (HPE) report. Radiological diagnostic accuracy was assessed with HPE as reference standard.

Results:

A total of 80 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria (M: F = 27:53). The final HPE diagnoses were solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (32.5%), walled off necrosis/pseudocyst (27.5%), mucinous cystadenoma (15%), serous cystadenoma (11.25%), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (8.75%), mucinous cystadenocarcinoma (2.5%), simple epithelial cyst (1.25%), and unspecified benign cystic lesion (1.25%). Observer1 correctly identified the diagnosis in 73.75% of cases while observer 2 did so in 72.5%. Sensitivity for distinguishing benign versus malignant/potentially malignant lesions was 85.1% for observer 1 and 80.9% for observer 2. On multivariate logistic regression analysis: Solid cystic morphology, presence of mural nodule, and female gender were associated with premalignant/malignant lesions.

Conclusion:

Cross-sectional imaging is a valuable tool for characterization of pancreatic cystic lesions within its limitations.