1
|
McNamara B, Demirkiran C, Hartwich TMP, Bellone S, Manavella D, Mutlu L, Greenman M, Zipponi M, Yang-Hartwich Y, Yang K, Ratner E, Schwartz PE, Coma S, Pachter JA, Santin AD. Preclinical efficacy of RAF/MEK clamp avutometinib in combination with FAK inhibition in low grade serous ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 183:133-140. [PMID: 38493021 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Low-grade-serous-ovarian-carcinoma (LGSOC) is characterized by a high recurrence rate and limited therapeutic options. About one-third of LGSOC contains mutations in MAPK pathway genes such as KRAS/NRAS/BRAF. Avutometinib is a dual RAF/MEK inhibitor while defactinib and VS-4718 are focal-adhesion-kinase-inhibitors (FAKi). We determined the preclinical efficacy of avutometinib±VS-4718 in LGSOC patient-derived-tumor-xenografts (PDX). METHODS Whole-exome-sequencing (WES) was used to evaluate the genetic fingerprint of 3 patient-derived LGSOC (OVA(K)250, PERIT(M)17 and A(PE)148). OVA(K)250 tissue was successfully xenografted as PDX into female CB17/lcrHsd-Prkdc/SCID-mice. Animals were treated with either control, avutometinib, VS-4718, or avutometinib/ VS-4718 once daily five days on and two days off through oral gavage. Mechanistic studies were performed ex vivo using avutometinib±defactinib treated LGSOC tumor samples by western blot. RESULTS WES results demonstrated wild-type KRAS in all 3 LGSOC. OVA(K)250 PDX showed gain-of-function mutations (GOF) in PTK2 and PTK2B genes, and loss-of-heterozygosity in ADRB2, potentially sensitizing to FAK and RAF/MEK inhibition. The combination of avutometinib/ VS-4718 demonstrated strong tumor-growth inhibition compared to controls starting at day 9 (p < 0.002) in OVA(K)250PDX. By 60 days, mice treated with avutometinib alone and avutometinib/VS-4718 were still alive; compared to median survival of 20 days in control-treated mice and of 35 days in VS-4718-treated mice (p < 0.0001). By western-blot assays exposure of OVA(K)250 to avutometinib, FAKi defactinib and their combination demonstrated decreased phosphorylated FAK (p-FAK) as well as decreased p-ERK. CONCLUSION Avutometinib, and to a larger extent its combination with FAK inhibitor VS-4718, demonstrated promising in vivo activity against a KRAS wild-type LGSOC-PDX. These data support the ongoing registration-directed study (RAMP201/NCT04625270).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blair McNamara
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Cem Demirkiran
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Tobias Max Philipp Hartwich
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Stefania Bellone
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Diego Manavella
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Levent Mutlu
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Michelle Greenman
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Margherita Zipponi
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Yang Yang-Hartwich
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kevin Yang
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Elena Ratner
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Peter E Schwartz
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Silvia Coma
- Verastem Oncology Inc, 117 Kendrick Street, Suite 500, Needham, MA 02494, USA
| | - Jonathan A Pachter
- Verastem Oncology Inc, 117 Kendrick Street, Suite 500, Needham, MA 02494, USA
| | - Alessandro D Santin
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tsibulak I, Fotopoulou C. Tumor biology and impact on timing of surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:1627-1632. [PMID: 37553165 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in epithelial ovarian cancer research have led to a shift in treatment strategy from the traditional 'organ-centric' to a personalized tumor biology-based approach. Nevertheless, we are still far behind an individualized approach for cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer; the gold standard of primary treatment in combination with systemic agents. The impact of tumor biology on treatment sequence is still understudied. It is obvious, that response to platinum-based therapy is crucial for the success of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. While high-grade serous and endometrioid tumors are commonly characterized by an excellent response, other subtypes are considered poor responders or even resistant to platinum. Undoubtedly, neoadjuvant chemotherapy may filter poor responders, but to date, we still do not have appropriate alternatives to platinum-based chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant and first-line setting and 'adjusting' systemic treatment in cases of poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains elusive. Primary cytoreduction is still considered the gold standard for fit patients with operable tumor dissemination patterns, especially for those ovarian cancer subtypes that show poor response to platinum. Of note, even in high-grade serous ovarian cancer, approximately 20% of tumors are platinum resistant and the benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in this subgroup is limited. Interestingly, these tumors are associated with the mesenchymal molecular subtype, which in turn correlates with high risk for residual disease after cytoreductive surgery and is characterized by the worst survival outcome among high-grade ovarian cancers. This leads to the question, how to best tailor surgical radicality at the onset of patients' presentation to avoid associated morbidity and with a moderate benefit. Here, we give an overview of recent advances of interaction between tumor biology and surgery in ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irina Tsibulak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Silberman JN, Bercow AS, Gockley AA, Eisenhauer EL, Sisodia R, Randall T, Del Carmen MG, Goodman A, Castro CM, Melamed A, Bregar AJ. Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for low-grade serous ovarian cancer in the United States. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 175:60-65. [PMID: 37327540 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe trends in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) use for low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) and to quantify associations between NACT and extent of cytoreductive surgery. METHODS We identified women treated for stage III or IV serous ovarian cancer in a Commission on Cancer accredited program between January 2004-December 2020. Regression models were developed to evaluate trends in NACT use for LGSOC, to identify factors associated with receipt of NACT, and to quantify associations between NACT and bowel or urinary resection at the time of surgery. Demographic and clinical factors were used for confounder control. RESULTS We observed 3350 patients who received treatment for LGSOC during the study period. The proportion of patients who received NACT increased from 9.5% in 2004 to 25.9% in 2020, corresponding to an annual percent change of 7.2% (95% CI 5.6-8.9). Increasing age (rate ratio (RR) 1.15; 95% CI 1.07-1.24), and stage IV disease (RR 2.66; 95% CI 2.31-3.07) were associated with a higher likelihood of receiving NACT. For patients with high-grade disease, NACT was associated with a decrease in likelihood of bowel or urinary surgery (35.3% versus 23.9%; RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.65-0.71). For LGSOC, NACT was associated with a higher likelihood of these procedures (26.6% versus 32.2%; RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.08-1.42). CONCLUSION NACT use among patients with LGSOC has increased from 2004 to 2020. While NACT was associated with a lower rate of gastrointestinal and urinary surgery among patients with high-grade disease, patients with LGSOC receiving NACT were more likely to undergo these procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason N Silberman
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
| | - Alexandra S Bercow
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Allison A Gockley
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Eric L Eisenhauer
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Rachel Sisodia
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Thomas Randall
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Marcela G Del Carmen
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Annekathryn Goodman
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Cesar M Castro
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Alexander Melamed
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Wentworth-Douglass Hospital, Dover, NH, United States
| | - Amy J Bregar
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Wentworth-Douglass Hospital, Dover, NH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
De Decker K, Wenzel HHB, Bart J, van der Aa MA, Kruitwagen RFPM, Nijman HW, Kruse A. Stage, treatment and survival of low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma in the Netherlands: A nationwide study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2023; 102:246-256. [PMID: 36734363 PMCID: PMC9951382 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Serous ovarian carcinomas constitute the largest group of epithelial ovarian cancer (60%-75%) and are further classified into high- and low-grade serous carcinoma. Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) is a relatively rare subtype (approximately 5% of serous carcinomas) and epidemiologic studies of large cohorts are scarce. With the present study we aimed to report trends in stage, primary treatment and relative survival of LGSC of the ovary in a large cohort of patients in an effort to identify opportunities to improve clinical practice and outcome of this relatively rare disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with LGSC between 2000 and 2019 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (n = 855). Trends in FIGO stages and primary treatment were analyzed with the Cochran-Armitage trend test, and differences in and trends of 5-year relative survival were analyzed using multivariable Poisson regression. RESULTS Over time, LGSC was increasingly diagnosed as stage III (39.9%-59.0%) and IV disease (5.7%-14.4%) and less often as stage I (34.6%-13.5%; p < 0.001). Primary debulking surgery was the most common strategy (76.2%), although interval debulking surgery was preferred more often over the years (10.6%-31.1%; p < 0.001). Following primary surgery, there was >1 cm residual disease in only 15/252 patients (6%), compared with 17/95 patients (17.9%) after interval surgery. Full cohort 5-year survival was 61% and survival after primary debulking surgery was superior to the outcome following interval debulking surgery (60% vs 34%). Survival following primary debulking surgery without macroscopic residual disease (73%) was better compared with ≤1 cm (47%) and >1 cm residual disease (22%). Survival following interval debulking surgery without macroscopic residual disease (51%) was significantly higher than after >1 cm residual disease (24%). Except FIGO stage II (85%-92%), survival did not change significantly over time. CONCLUSIONS Over the years, LGSC has been diagnosed as FIGO stage III and stage IV disease more often and interval debulking surgery has been increasingly preferred over primary debulking in these patients. Relative survival did not change over time (except for stage II) and worse survival outcomes after interval debulking surgery were observed. The results support the common recommendation to perform primary debulking surgery in patients eligible for primary surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen De Decker
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyIsala HospitalZwolleThe Netherlands,Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Medical Center GroningenUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Hans H. B. Wenzel
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Medical Center GroningenUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands,Department of Research & DevelopmentNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer OrganizationUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Joost Bart
- Department of Pathology and Medical BiologyUniversity of GroningenUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Maaike A. van der Aa
- Department of Research & DevelopmentNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer OrganizationUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Roy F. P. M. Kruitwagen
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMaastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtThe Netherlands,GROW ‐ School for Oncology and ReproductionUniversity of MaastrichtMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Hans W. Nijman
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Medical Center GroningenUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Arnold‐Jan Kruse
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyIsala HospitalZwolleThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liu Y, Ni M, Huang F, Gu Q, Xiao Y, Du X. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer by histology: A SEER based survival analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e32774. [PMID: 36705377 PMCID: PMC9875958 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000032774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
To evaluate the prognostic effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients with different histological subtype. Stage III/IV EOC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 were identified from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database (SEER) database and stratified by histological subtype. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for the assessment of overall survival (OS) cause-specific survival (CSS) before and after matching for baseline characteristics between NACT and primary debulking surgery (PDS) groups. Cox proportional risk model was conducted to identify independent prognostic factors. A total of 13,582 patients were included in the analysis. Of them, 9505 (74.50%) received PDS and 3253 (25.50%) received NACT. Overall, an inferior OS and CSS was observed among patients with high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) receiving NACT, while NACT served as a protective factor in clear cell carcinoma and carcinosarcoma in both original cohorts and adjusted cohorts. For other histo-subtypes, PDS showed survival benefit over NACT in certain cohorts of models. Prognostic effect of NACT in advanced EOC differed from pathological subtypes. Although it served as a risk factor for HGSC, patients with less common subtypes may benefit from NACT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuexi Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The first Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- *Correspondence: Yuexi Liu, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China (e-mail: )
| | - Meng Ni
- International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Embryo Original Disease, Shanghai, China
| | - Fanfan Huang
- Department of Ophthalmology, The first Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Qiuying Gu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The first Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yao Xiao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The first Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xinyue Du
- Department of Cardiovascular medicine, The first Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nuthalapati S, Kundargi RS, Reddihalli PV, Rathod PS, Krishnappa S. Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma: a Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Cancer Institute. Indian J Surg Oncol 2022; 13:707-715. [PMID: 36687250 PMCID: PMC9845476 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-022-01543-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinico-pathological behaviour and treatment patterns of low-grade serous carcinomas (LGSC) of ovary treated at a regional cancer centre. A retrospective analysis was done for the histopathology-proven cases of low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, treated at a tertiary cancer institute between January, 2010, and September, 2019. There were 28 patients identified from the medical records with low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Median age of the patients was 43 years [22-79 years]. Average BMI was 22.3 ± 4.0 kg/m2 [range 15.2-31.2]. Twenty-one (75%) were parous and 7 (25%) were non-parous women. Median CA125 level was 188 IU/ml [range 6-14,187 IU/ml]. Ten (35.7%) patients had primary surgery elsewhere and 8 (80%) out of these patients had to undergo repeat staging. Fertility sparing surgery (FSS) was offered to 4 (14.3%) patients. Five (17.8%) patients had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced disease and poor performance status. Almost 82.2% (23) of the patients had no macroscopic residual disease at the primary surgery. According to International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists (FIGO) stage for ovarian carcinoma, there were 7 (25%), 6 (21.4%), 13 (46.4%), and 2 (7.1%) patients in the stages I, II, III, and IV respectively. Post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy was offered to 7 (25%), hormonal therapy (anastrozole/tamoxifen) to 7 (25%), and rest of 14 (50%) patients were under surveillance. Median follow-up time for the study group was 36 months. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 2 years was 96.4% and 89.1%, respectively. Low-grade serous carcinomas of ovary differ biologically from high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Surgery is the cornerstone of the treatment. Further research is needed to understand the behaviour of these tumours for effective treatment strategies in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sravanthi Nuthalapati
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, 560029 Karnataka India
| | - Rajshekhar S. Kundargi
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, 560029 Karnataka India
| | - Pallavi V. Reddihalli
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, 560029 Karnataka India
| | - Praveen S. Rathod
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, 560029 Karnataka India
| | - Shobha Krishnappa
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, 560029 Karnataka India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Di Lorenzo P, Conteduca V, Scarpi E, Adorni M, Multinu F, Garbi A, Betella I, Grassi T, Bianchi T, Di Martino G, Amadori A, Maniglio P, Strada I, Carinelli S, Jaconi M, Aletti G, Zanagnolo V, Maggioni A, Savelli L, De Giorgi U, Landoni F, Colombo N, Fruscio R. Advanced low grade serous ovarian cancer: A retrospective analysis of surgical and chemotherapeutic management in two high volume oncological centers. Front Oncol 2022; 12:970918. [PMID: 36237308 PMCID: PMC9551309 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.970918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple summaryLow-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) represents an uncommon histotype of serous ovarian cancer (accounting for approximately 5% of all ovarian cancer) with a distinct behavior compared to its high-grade serous counterpart, characterized by a better prognosis and low response rate to chemotherapeutic agents. Similar to high-grade serous ovarian cancer, cytoreductive surgery is considered crucial for patient survival. This retrospective study aimed to analyze the outcomes of women affected by advanced stages (III–IV FIGO) of LGSOC from two high-volume oncological centers for ovarian neoplasm. In particular, we sought to evaluate the impact on survival outcomes of optimal cytoreductive surgery [i.e., residual disease (RD) <10 mm at the end of surgery]. The results of our work confirm the role of complete cytoreduction (i.e., no evidence of disease after surgery) in the survival of patients and even the positive prognostic role of a minimal RD (i.e., <10 mm), whenever complete cytoreduction cannot be achieved.BackgroundLow-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is a rare entity with different behavior compared to high-grade serous (HGSOC). Because of its general low chemosensitivity, complete cytoreductive surgery with no residual disease is crucial in advanced stage LGSOC. We evaluated the impact of optimal cytoreduction on survival outcome both at first diagnosis and at recurrence.MethodsWe retrospectively studied consecutive patients diagnosed with advanced LGSOCs who underwent cytoreductive surgery in two oncological centers from January 1994 to December 2018. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using the Greenwood formula.ResultsA total of 92 patients were included (median age was 47 years, IQR 35–64). The median overall survival (OS) was 142.3 months in patients with no residual disease (RD), 86.4 months for RD 1–10 mm and 35.2 months for RD >10 mm (p = 0.002). Progression-free survival (PFS) was inversely related to RD after primary cytoreductive surgery (RD = 0 vs RD = 1–10 mm vs RD >10 mm, p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, RD 1–10 mm (HR = 2.30, 95% CI 1.30–4.06, p = 0.004), RD >10 mm (HR = 3.89, 95% CI 1.92–7.88, p = 0.0004), FIGO stage IV (p = 0.001), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) (p = 0.010) were independent predictors of PFS. RD >10 mm (HR = 3.13, 95% CI 1.52–6.46, p = 0.004), FIGO stage IV (p <0.0001) and NACT (p = 0.030) were significantly associated with a lower OS.ConclusionsOptimal cytoreductive surgery improves survival outcomes in advanced stage LGSOCs. When complete debulking is impossible, a RD <10 mm confers better OS compared to an RD >10 mm in this setting of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Di Lorenzo
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
- *Correspondence: Paolo Di Lorenzo, ; Ugo De Giorgi,
| | - Vincenza Conteduca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
- Unit of Medical Oncology and Biomolecular Therapy, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Policlinico Riuniti, Foggia, Italy
| | - Emanuela Scarpi
- Biostatistics and Clinical Trials Unit, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Marco Adorni
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Francesco Multinu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy
| | - Annalisa Garbi
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy
| | - Ilaria Betella
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy
| | - Tommaso Grassi
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Tommaso Bianchi
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Di Martino
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Andrea Amadori
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Paolo Maniglio
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Isabella Strada
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Silvestro Carinelli
- Department of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy
| | - Marta Jaconi
- Department of Pathology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Giovanni Aletti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
| | - Vanna Zanagnolo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy
| | - Angelo Maggioni
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy
| | - Luca Savelli
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
- *Correspondence: Paolo Di Lorenzo, ; Ugo De Giorgi,
| | - Fabio Landoni
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di ricovero e cura a carattere scientifico (IRCCS), Milano, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Robert Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Traditional Systemic Treatment Options in Advanced Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer after Successful Cytoreduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153681. [PMID: 35954344 PMCID: PMC9367493 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Low-Grade Serous Ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is considered less sensitive to traditional chemotherapy than its high-grade counterpart. Guidelines are still inconsistent around the use and value of cytotoxic and antihormonal agents in the adjuvant setting. Traditional cytotoxic or antihormonal systemic treatment option is not associated with a significant OS or PFS benefit in this Meta-analysis. Abstract Objective: We performed a systematic literature review and a subsequent meta-analysis to compare traditional treatment options, i.e., antihormonal and cytotoxic, in LGSOC. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review in MEDBASE and MEDLINE between September 2000 and June 2021 for women who received cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or antihormonal treatment after primary cytoreduction due to stage II–IV LGSOC and also at relapse. PFS and OS were calculated depending on the type of their adjuvant treatment. For each endpoint in the meta-analysis, pooled HR was calculated using the random effect model with the inverse variance weighted method. Only primary patients were included in the subsequent meta-analysis due to the small number of studies in the relapsed setting. Results: Five eligible first-line studies were included. Systemic chemotherapy failed to provide a significant OS benefit when compared to no systemic treatment (pooled HR = 1.01, 95% CI [0.79, 1.29]) after successful cytoreduction. Moreover, systemic chemotherapy followed by antihormonal treatment also did not result to a significant PFS or OS benefit when compared to systemic chemotherapy alone (for PSF: pooled HR = 0.59, 95% CI [0.33, 1.04]; for OS: pooled HR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.50, 1.39]). There were insufficient data from studies in the recurrent setting to allow their inclusion in the meta-analysis. Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, we failed to identify a traditional cytotoxic or antihormonal systemic treatment option that was associated with a significant OS or PFS benefit when administered following successful cytoreduction for advanced LGSOC. Prospective randomized studies are urgently warranted to define optimal adjuvant options in this challenging disease.
Collapse
|
9
|
Zaccarini F, Roosen A, Sanson C, Maulard A, Scherier S, Pautier P, Leary A, Chargari C, Morice P, Gouy S. [Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: A retrospective study on 34 complete cytoreductive surgeries]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 49:750-755. [PMID: 33933671 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY Low-grade serous ovarian cancer is a distinct, slow-growing entity that affects mainly young women. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical characterisitics and survival outcomes of a population of patients suffering from advanced stage CSBG. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective study was carried out in patients with advanced stage ovarian CSBG (FIGO IIIb-IV) who had complete macroscopic cytoreductive surgery, at Gustave Roussy Institut, Villejuif, between 2004 and 2017. RESULTS Thirty-four patients were included, who were mainly young women (mean age 41.3 years), diagnosed at FIGO stage IIIC (91 %). The median follow-up was 41 months. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 16 patients (47.1 %), and complete response never occurred. Upper abdominal surgical procedures were necessary in 90 % of cases and a bowel resection was performed in more than 80 % of cases. Over 90 % of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy followed by maintenance treatment with bevacizumab in over 40 % of cases. During follow-up, 9 (26 %) deaths occurred. Five-year overall survival was 70 % and disease-free survival was 20 %. CONCLUSION CSBG of the ovary has a low chemosensitivity and requires maximum surgical management, which should be performed in expert centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Zaccarini
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| | - A Roosen
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - C Sanson
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - A Maulard
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - S Scherier
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - P Pautier
- Service d'oncologie médicale, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - A Leary
- Service d'oncologie médicale, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - C Chargari
- Service de radiothérapie, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - P Morice
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - S Gouy
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vatansever D, Taskiran C, Mutlu Meydanli M, Gungorduk K, Akbayir O, Yalcin I, Demirkiran F, Sozen H, Ozgul N, Celik H, Onan MA, Taskin S, Oge T, Simsek T, Abboud S, Yuksel IT, Ayhan A. Impact of cytoreductive surgery on survival of patients with low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: A multicentric study of Turkish Society of Gynecologic Oncology (TRSGO-OvCa-001). J Surg Oncol 2021; 123:1801-1810. [PMID: 33657253 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Revised: 02/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to analyze the factors affecting recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of women diagnosed with low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC). METHODS Databases from 13 participating centers in Turkey were searched retrospectively for women who had been treated for stage I-IV LGSOC between 1997 and 2018. RESULTS Overall 191 eligible women were included. The median age at diagnosis was 49 years (range, 21-84 years). One hundred seventy-five (92%) patients underwent primary cytoreductive surgery. Complete and optimal cytoreduction was achieved in 148 (77.5%) and 33 (17.3%) patients, respectively. The median follow-up period was 44 months (range, 2-208 months). Multivariate analysis showed the presence of endometriosis (p = .012), lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (p = .022), any residual disease (p = .023), and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage II-IV disease (p = .045) were negatively correlated with RFS while the only presence of residual disease (p = .002) and FIGO stage II-IV disease (p = .003) significantly decreased OS. CONCLUSIONS The maximal surgical effort is warranted for complete cytoreduction as achieving no residual disease is the single most important variable affecting the survival of patients with LGSOC. The prognostic role of LVSI and endometriosis should be evaluated by further studies as both of these parameters significantly affected RFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dogan Vatansever
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, School of Medicine, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Cagatay Taskiran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, School of Medicine, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Mutlu Meydanli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Kemal Gungorduk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Ozgur Akbayir
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ibrahim Yalcin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fuat Demirkiran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hamdullah Sozen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Istanbul School of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nejat Ozgul
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Husnu Celik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, School of Medicine, Adana Baskent University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Anil Onan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Salih Taskin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Tufan Oge
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, School of Medicine, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey
| | - Tayyup Simsek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, School of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Sara Abboud
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Saint-Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Ilkbal Temel Yuksel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ali Ayhan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, School of Medicine, Ankara Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tsonis O, Gkrozou F, Vlachos K, Paschopoulos M, Mitsis MC, Zakynthinakis-Kyriakou N, Boussios S, Pappas-Gogos G. Upfront debulking surgery for high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: current evidence. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:1707. [PMID: 33490219 PMCID: PMC7812243 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-1620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is a leading cause of mortality among women worldwide. Currently, there is no clear consensus over the regime these patients should receive. The main two options are upfront debulking surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). The former approach is proposed to be accompanied by lower chemoresistance rates but could lead to severe surgical comorbidities and lower quality of life (QoL). Optimizing patient’s selection for upfront debulking surgery might offer higher progression-free and overall survival rates. Further studies need to be conducted in order to elucidate the predictive factors, which are favorable for patients undergoing upfront debulking surgery in cases of high-grade serous ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orestis Tsonis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Fani Gkrozou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Konstantinos Vlachos
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Minas Paschopoulos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Michail C Mitsis
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | | | - Stergios Boussios
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Gillingham, Kent, UK.,AELIA Organization, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - George Pappas-Gogos
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cobb LP, Sun CC, Iyer R, Nick AM, Fleming ND, Westin SN, Sood AK, Wong KK, Silva EG, Gershenson DM. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary and peritoneum: Further evidence of relative chemoresistance. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 158:653-658. [PMID: 32709538 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.06.498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary/peritoneum (LGSC) is relatively chemoresistant in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and recurrent settings. We sought to expand our prior work and evaluate response rates of women with LGSC to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) compared to women with high-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary/peritoneum (HGSC). METHODS Thirty-six patients with LGSC who received NACT were matched to patients with HGSC. A single radiologist re-reviewed pre- and post-NACT imaging for response using RECIST 1.1. Pre- and post-NACT CA-125 values were compared using paired t-tests. Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed. RESULTS All patients received neoadjuvant platinum-based regimens. LGSC patients received a median of 5 cycles (range 3-9), HGSC patients received a median of 4 cycles (range 3-9). Interval cytoreductive surgery was performed in 29/36 (81%) of LGSC and 32/36 (89%) HGSC patients. Complete cytoreduction was reported and achieved in 11/29 (38%) of LGSC patients and 24/32 (75%) of HGSC patients (p = 0.002). Median pre- and post-treatment CA-125 levels for LGSC patients were 295.5 U/mL and 144 U/mL (52% decrease) (p < 0.001). The median pre- and post-treatment CA-125 levels for HGSC patients were 767.5 and 35.6 (96% decrease) (p < 0.001). For LGSC patients, 4/36 (11%) had partial response (PR), 30/36 (83%) had stable disease (SD), and 2/36 (6%) had progressive disease (PD). In HGSC patients, 27/36 (75%) had PR, and 9/36 (25%) SD. Median PFS for LGSC patients was 18.5 months and median OS was 47.4 months. CONCLUSIONS This study provides further evidence of relative chemoresistance of LGSC in patients treated with NACT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren P Cobb
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
| | - Charlotte C Sun
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Revathy Iyer
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology - Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Alpa M Nick
- Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Nicole D Fleming
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Shannon N Westin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Kwong K Wong
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Elvio G Silva
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - David M Gershenson
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bogani G, Brusadelli C, Guerrisi R, Lopez S, Signorelli M, Ditto A, Raspagliesi F. Gynecologic oncology at the time of COVID-19 outbreak. J Gynecol Oncol 2020; 31:e72. [PMID: 32458597 PMCID: PMC7286755 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e72] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2020] [Revised: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The World Health Organization (WHO) classified the novel coronavirus (i.e., coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]) as a global public health emergency. COVID-19 threatens to curtail patient access to evidence-based treatment. Medicine is changing, basically due to the limited available resources. In the field of gynecologic oncology, we have to re-design our treatments' paradigm. During COVID-19 pandemic outbreak, the highest priority is to achieve the maximum benefit from less demanding procedures. Extensive procedures should be avoided, in order to reduce hospitalization and postoperative events that might increase the in-hospital spread of the virus. There are ongoing concerns on the use of laparoscopic procedures, related to the possible contamination of the staff working in the operation room. Other minimally invasive techniques, including, vaginal surgery as well as robotic-assisted and isobaric procedures would be preferred over laparoscopy. A fair allocation of resources is paramount adequate treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy.
| | - Claudia Brusadelli
- Univerity of Insubria, Ospedale di Circolo Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
| | - Rocco Guerrisi
- Univerity of Insubria, Ospedale di Circolo Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
| | - Salvatore Lopez
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Mauro Signorelli
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Antonino Ditto
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Therapeutic Approach to Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma: State of Art and Perspectives of Clinical Research. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12051336. [PMID: 32456205 PMCID: PMC7281204 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12051336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) is a distinct pathologic and clinical entity, characterized by less aggressive biological behavior, lower sensitivity to chemotherapy and longer survival compared with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. LGSOC often harbors activating mutations of genes involved in mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Patients with disease confined to the gonad(s) should undergo bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, total hysterectomy and comprehensive surgical staging, although fertility-sparing surgery can be considered in selected cases. Women with stage IA-IB disease should undergo observation alone after surgery, whereas observation, chemotherapy or endocrine therapy are all possible options for those with stage IC-IIA disease. Patients with advanced disease should undergo primary debulking surgery with the aim of removing all macroscopically detectable disease, whereas neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debuking surgery. After surgery, the patients can receive either carboplatin plus paclitaxel followed by endocrine therapy or endocrine therapy alone. Molecularly targeted agents, and especially MEK inhibitors and Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors, are currently under evaluation. Additional research on the genomics of LGSOC and clinical trials on the combination of MEK inhibitors with hormonal agents, other molecularly targeted agents or metformin, are strongly warranted to improve the prognosis of patients with this malignancy.
Collapse
|
15
|
Scott SA, Llaurado Fernandez M, Kim H, Elit L, Nourmoussavi M, Glaze S, Roberts L, Offman SL, Rahimi K, Lytwyn A, Sur M, Gilks CB, Matheson K, Köbel M, Dawson A, Tinker AV, Kwon JS, Hoskins P, Santos JL, Cheung A, Provencher D, Carey MS. Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC): A Canadian multicenter review of practice patterns and patient outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 157:36-45. [PMID: 32001076 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2019] [Revised: 11/28/2019] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with advanced low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) have poor long-term survival rates. As a rare histotype, there are uncertainties regarding the use of current therapies. Thus, we studied practice patterns and treatment outcomes as part of a national initiative to better understand and improve the care of women with advanced LGSC. METHODS This retrospective cohort study was conducted in 5 Canadian referral institutions from 2000 to 2016. Data collection and pathology reporting were standardized. Outcome measures included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), progression-free intervals (PFI), and time to next treatment (TTNT). Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the effects of clinical and pathologic factors on outcomes and prognosis. RESULTS There were 134 patients (stage II-IV) with a median follow-up of 32.4 months (range 1.6-228). Four primary treatments were compared across institutions: 1) surgery followed by chemotherapy (56%), 2) neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by surgery (27%), 3) surgery alone (9%), and 4) surgery followed by anti-hormone therapy (4%). Primary platinum/paclitaxel chemotherapy was used in 81%. Patients treated with NACT had worse PFS. Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified lesser residual disease, younger age, and primary peritoneal origin as variables significantly associated with better OS/PFS (p < 0.03). One institution had significantly better PFS than the others (p = 0.025), but this finding could be related to a higher frequency of primary peritoneal LGSC. PFI and TTNT intervals in patients with relapsed disease were not significantly different after the first relapse irrespective of treatment type. CONCLUSIONS There are notable differences in practice patterns across Canada. This underscores the need for ongoing strategies to measure, evaluate and achieve optimal patient outcomes for women with advanced LGSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Scott
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
| | - Marta Llaurado Fernandez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Hannah Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Laurie Elit
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melica Nourmoussavi
- Division of Gynecologic-Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de Université de Montréal, (CHUM) and Centre de recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sarah Glaze
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lesley Roberts
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Saul L Offman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Kurosh Rahimi
- Department of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alice Lytwyn
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Health Research Methods, Evaluation, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Monalisa Sur
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University and The Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kara Matheson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Amy Dawson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anna V Tinker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Janice S Kwon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Paul Hoskins
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jennifer L Santos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andrea Cheung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Diane Provencher
- Division of Gynecologic-Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de Université de Montréal, (CHUM) and Centre de recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mark S Carey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pauly N, Ehmann S, Ricciardi E, Ataseven B, Bommert M, Heitz F, Prader S, Schneider S, du Bois A, Harter P, Baert T. Low-grade Serous Tumors: Are We Making Progress? Curr Oncol Rep 2020; 22:8. [PMID: 31989304 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-020-0872-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review provides an overview of the current clinical standard in low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC). The available evidence for surgery and standard treatments is elaborated. In addition, we discuss recent findings and novel treatments for LGSOC. RECENT FINDINGS Two large multicenter trials studying MEK inhibitors in LGSOC have been presented in the last year. Binimetinib demonstrated an activity in LGSOC, especially in KRAS-mutated disease. Trametinib was associated with an improved progression-free survival in relapsed LGSOC. Based on the current results, MEK inhibitors could be an alternative treatment for LGSOC. Surgery is an important step in the treatment of LGSOC. Hormonal therapy and bevacizumab can be beneficial, next to chemotherapy. Targeted treatments, such as the MEK-inhibitor trametinib, seem to be efficient and should be introduced into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Pauly
- Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistraße 92, 45136, Essen, Germany
| | - Sarah Ehmann
- Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistraße 92, 45136, Essen, Germany
| | - Enzo Ricciardi
- Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistraße 92, 45136, Essen, Germany
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistraße 92, 45136, Essen, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mareike Bommert
- Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistraße 92, 45136, Essen, Germany
| | - Florian Heitz
- Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistraße 92, 45136, Essen, Germany
| | - Sonia Prader
- Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistraße 92, 45136, Essen, Germany
| | - Stephanie Schneider
- Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistraße 92, 45136, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistraße 92, 45136, Essen, Germany
| | - Philipp Harter
- Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistraße 92, 45136, Essen, Germany
| | - Thaïs Baert
- Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistraße 92, 45136, Essen, Germany. .,Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Slomovitz B, Gourley C, Carey MS, Malpica A, Shih IM, Huntsman D, Fader AN, Grisham RN, Schlumbrecht M, Sun CC, Ludemann J, Cooney GA, Coleman R, Sood AK, Mahdi H, Wong KK, Covens A, O'Malley DM, Lecuru F, Cobb LP, Caputo TA, May T, Huang M, Siemon J, Fernández ML, Ray-Coquard I, Gershenson DM. Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: State of the science. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 156:715-725. [PMID: 31969252 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.12.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Revised: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
In January 2019, a group of basic, translational, and clinical investigators and patient advocates assembled in Miami, Florida, to discuss the current state of the science of low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum-a rare ovarian cancer subtype that may arise de novo or following a diagnosis of serous borderline tumor. The purpose of the conference was to review current knowledge, discuss ongoing research by established researchers, and frame critical questions or issues for future directions. Following presentations and discussions, the primary objective was to initiate future collaborations, uniform database platforms, laboratory studies, and clinical trials to better understand this disease and to advance clinical care outside the boundaries of single academic institutions. This review summarizes the state of the science in five principal categories: epidemiology and patient outcomes, pathology, translational research, patient care and clinical trials, and patients' perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Slomovitz
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States.
| | - Charlie Gourley
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | - Mark S Carey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Anais Malpica
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ie-Ming Shih
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - David Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Amanda N Fader
- Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Rachel N Grisham
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States; Weil Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - Matthew Schlumbrecht
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Charlotte C Sun
- Division of Surgery, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jane Ludemann
- Cure Our Ovarian Cancer, cureourovariancancer.org, New Zealand
| | - Gail Austin Cooney
- University of Miami/JFK Medical Center Palm Beach Regional Graduate Medical Education Consortium, Hospice and Palliative Medicine Program, West Palm Beach, FL, United States
| | - Robert Coleman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Haider Mahdi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States; Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Kwong K Wong
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Allan Covens
- University of Toronto, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David M O'Malley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, The James CCC at the Wexner Medical Center-The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Fabrice Lecuru
- Service de Chirurgie Cancérologique Gynécologique et du Sein, Hôpital Européen George Pompidou, APHP, Paris, France; Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Lauren P Cobb
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Thomas A Caputo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Taymaa May
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marilyn Huang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - John Siemon
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | | | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Centre Leon Bèrard, Université Claude Bernard Lyon, Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers de l'Ovaire (GINECO), Lyon, France
| | - David M Gershenson
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Goulding EA, Simcock B, McLachlan J, van der Griend R, Sykes P. Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: A comprehensive literature review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2019; 60:27-33. [PMID: 31849044 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) is a unique entity with clinical and molecular characteristics distinct from high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). To date the majority of research has focused on the more common HGSOC, with treatment recommendations often extrapolated to LGSOC. Women with LGSOC are typically diagnosed younger and have indolent and relatively chemoresistant disease. Recently there have been major research advances in LGSOC. AIMS This systematic review describes the epidemiological, clinical and molecular characteristics of LGSOC, with advances in research and novel treatment options also discussed. MATERIALS AND METHODS A 10-year comprehensive systematic review of peer-reviewed literature was conducted, with a total of 132 abstracts read, 89 articles reviewed and 49 included in this review. RESULTS This review highlights the clinical and molecular features of LGSOC, current and traditional treatment options and areas of current research into targeted agents. CONCLUSIONS Our growing knowledge about LGSOC as a distinct clinical and molecular entity from HGSOC has led to the investigation of more targeted and tailored therapies as their clinical course, optimal management and therapeutic targets differ. There is a need for ongoing collaborative research to provide better treatment options for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Goulding
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Christchurch Women's Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Bryony Simcock
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Christchurch Women's Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Jennifer McLachlan
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Christchurch Women's Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Rachael van der Griend
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Christchurch Women's Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Peter Sykes
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Christchurch Women's Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Qi ZY, Wang F, Yue YY, Guo XW, Guo RM, Li HL, Xu YY. CYPA promotes the progression and metastasis of serous ovarian cancer (SOC) in vitro and in vivo. J Ovarian Res 2019; 12:118. [PMID: 31783885 PMCID: PMC6884760 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-019-0593-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is a type of gynaecological malignancy with high mortality in females. Serous ovarian cancer (SOC) is a distinct subtype of OC with poor early diagnosis. Given the limitations of traditional therapies, such as chemotherapy, targeted treatment is therefore a promising therapy to improve the survival rate of SOC patients. Cyclophilin A (CYPA) is a member of Cyclophilin family and thought to participates in multiple cellular processes such as cell transduction and immune modulation. Recently, various of studies indicated that CYPA has critical impact on cancer progression. CYPA could regulate cell proliferation, invasion, and chemoresistance of multiple types of cancers. However, it is still unclear whether it could affect ovarian cancer. In this study, we demonstrated that CYPA was highly expressed in SOC tissues compared with adjacent tissues. Further, CYPA was significantly associated with clinical stage and lymphnode metastasis of SOC patients. Additionally, data indicated that knockdown of CYPA by its shRNA dramatically reduces migration and invasion capacity of SOC cells in vitro and blocks tumor metastasis in vivo. Our study investigates the involvement of CYPA in the progression and metastasis of SOC, and therefore provides CYPA as a promising therapeutic target for SOC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-Ying Qi
- Department of gynecolog, the second hospital of Tianjin medical university, No.23 Pingjiang road, Hexi district, Tianjin, 300211 China
| | - Fang Wang
- Department of gynecolog, the second hospital of Tianjin medical university, No.23 Pingjiang road, Hexi district, Tianjin, 300211 China
| | - Ying-Ying Yue
- Department of gynecolog, the second hospital of Tianjin medical university, No.23 Pingjiang road, Hexi district, Tianjin, 300211 China
| | - Xue-Wang Guo
- Department of gynecolog, the second hospital of Tianjin medical university, No.23 Pingjiang road, Hexi district, Tianjin, 300211 China
| | - Rui-Meng Guo
- Department of gynecolog, the second hospital of Tianjin medical university, No.23 Pingjiang road, Hexi district, Tianjin, 300211 China
| | - Hong-Lin Li
- Department of gynecolog, the second hospital of Tianjin medical university, No.23 Pingjiang road, Hexi district, Tianjin, 300211 China
| | - Yan-Ying Xu
- Department of gynecolog, the second hospital of Tianjin medical university, No.23 Pingjiang road, Hexi district, Tianjin, 300211 China
| |
Collapse
|