1
|
Moss E, Taylor A, Andreou A, Ang C, Arora R, Attygalle A, Banerjee S, Bowen R, Buckley L, Burbos N, Coleridge S, Edmondson R, El-Bahrawy M, Fotopoulou C, Frost J, Ganesan R, George A, Hanna L, Kaur B, Manchanda R, Maxwell H, Michael A, Miles T, Newton C, Nicum S, Ratnavelu N, Ryan N, Sundar S, Vroobel K, Walther A, Wong J, Morrison J. British Gynaecological Cancer Society (BGCS) ovarian, tubal and primary peritoneal cancer guidelines: Recommendations for practice update 2024. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024; 300:69-123. [PMID: 39002401 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Moss
- College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
| | | | - Adrian Andreou
- Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | - Christine Ang
- Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Gateshead, UK
| | - Rupali Arora
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University College London NHS Trust, 60 Whitfield Street, London W1T 4E, UK
| | | | | | - Rebecca Bowen
- Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | - Lynn Buckley
- Beverley Counselling & Psychotherapy, 114 Holme Church Lane, Beverley, East Yorkshire HU17 0PY, UK
| | - Nikos Burbos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK
| | | | - Richard Edmondson
- Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester and University of Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Mona El-Bahrawy
- Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK
| | | | - Jonathan Frost
- Gynaecological Oncology, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath, Bath BA1 3NG, UK; University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Raji Ganesan
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK
| | | | - Louise Hanna
- Department of Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre, Whitchurch, Cardiff CF14 2TL, UK
| | - Baljeet Kaur
- North West London Pathology (NWLP), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London and Barts Health NHS Trust, UK
| | - Hillary Maxwell
- Dorset County Hospital, Williams Avenue, Dorchester, Dorset DT1 2JY, UK
| | - Agnieszka Michael
- Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford GU2 7XX and University of Surrey, School of Biosciences, GU2 7WG, UK
| | - Tracey Miles
- Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | - Claire Newton
- Gynaecology Oncology Department, St Michael's Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS1 3NU, UK
| | - Shibani Nicum
- Department of Oncology, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | | | - Neil Ryan
- The Centre for Reproductive Health, Institute for Regeneration and Repair (IRR), 4-5 Little France Drive, Edinburgh BioQuarter City, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, UK
| | - Sudha Sundar
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham and Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK
| | - Katherine Vroobel
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Marsden Foundation NHS Trust, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Axel Walther
- Bristol Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Jason Wong
- Department of Histopathology, East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Ipswich Hospital, Heath Road, Ipswich IP4 5PD, UK
| | - Jo Morrison
- University of Exeter, Exeter, UK; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, GRACE Centre, Musgrove Park Hospital, Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton TA1 5DA, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jiang R, Feng Y, Chen Y, Cheng X, Shi T, Gao W, Jia H, Jiang S, Guo Y, Huang X, Tu D, Zhang Y, Yang H, Zhang P, Liu J, Zhu J, Zang R. Surgery versus no surgery in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer: final overall survival analysis of the SOC-1 randomized phase 3 trial. Nat Med 2024; 30:2181-2188. [PMID: 38824243 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-02981-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
Surgery for platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer (PSROC) is widely practiced but had contradictory survival outcomes in previous studies. In this multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial, women with PSROC, and having had one previous therapy and no platinum-based chemotherapy (platinum-free interval) of 6 months or more, were randomly assigned to either the surgery group (182 patients) or the no-surgery group (control) (175 patients). Patients with resectable diseases were eligible according to the international model (iMODEL), combined with a positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were coprimary endpoints in hierarchical testing, and a significantly longer progression-free survival with surgery was previously reported. Final analysis of OS was planned at data maturity of 59%. Between 19 July 2012 and 3 June 2019, 357 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 82.5 months. Median OS was 58.1 months with surgery and 52.1 months for control (hazard ratio (HR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-1.05, P = 0.11). The predefined threshold for statistical significance was not met, but prespecified sensitivity analysis was performed. Overall, 61 of 175 (35%) patients in control had crossed over to surgery following subsequent relapse, and adjusted HR for death in the surgery group compared with control was 0.76, 95% CI 0.58-0.99. In subgroup analysis of relapse sites by imaging, median survival was not estimable in the surgery group and was 69.5 months in control in patients with <20 sites (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.46-1.03). Patients with a complete resection had the most favorable outcome, with a median OS of 73.0 months. Twenty-four of 182 (13.2%) patients remained relapse free and alive >60 months in the surgery group as compared with five of 175 (2.9%) patients in the control group. In patients with PSROC, surgery did not increase OS in the intention-to-treat population but resulted in a prolongation of survival following adjustment of crossover.ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT01611766 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong Jiang
- Institute for Ovarian Cancer, Fudan University & Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Center, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Yanling Feng
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yulian Chen
- Institute for Ovarian Cancer, Fudan University & Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Center, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Xi Cheng
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Tingyan Shi
- Institute for Ovarian Cancer, Fudan University & Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Center, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen Gao
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China
| | - Huixun Jia
- Clinical Statistics Centre, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Shiyang Jiang
- Institute for Ovarian Cancer, Fudan University & Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Center, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi Guo
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao Huang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Dongsheng Tu
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yuqin Zhang
- Institute for Ovarian Cancer, Fudan University & Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Center, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Huijuan Yang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Ping Zhang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China
| | - Jihong Liu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianqing Zhu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China
| | - Rongyu Zang
- Institute for Ovarian Cancer, Fudan University & Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Center, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Harutyunyan L, Manvelyan E, Karapetyan N, Bardakhchyan S, Jilavyan A, Tamamyan G, Avagyan A, Safaryan L, Zohrabyan D, Movsisyan N, Avinyan A, Galoyan A, Sargsyan M, Harutyunyan M, Nersoyan H, Stepanyan A, Galstyan A, Danielyan S, Muradyan A, Jilavyan G. A Survival Analysis of Patients with Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Based on Relapse Type: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study in Armenia. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:1323-1334. [PMID: 38534933 PMCID: PMC10968888 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31030100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Annually, approximately 200 new ovarian cancer cases are diagnosed in Armenia, which is considered an upper-middle-income country. This study aimed to summarize the survival outcomes of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer in Armenia based on the type of recurrence, risk factors, and choice of systemic treatment. METHODS This retrospective case-control study included 228 patients with relapsed ovarian cancer from three different institutions. RESULTS The median age of the patients was 55. The median follow-up times from relapse and primary diagnosis were 21 and 48 months, respectively. The incidence of platinum-sensitive relapse was 81.6% (186), while platinum-resistant relapse was observed in only 18.4% (42) of patients. The median post-progression survival of the platinum-sensitive group compared to the platinum-resistant group was 54 vs. 25 months (p < 0.001), respectively, while the median survival after relapse was 25 vs. 13 months, respectively; three- and five-year post-progression survival rates in these groups were 31.2% vs. 23.8%, and 15.1% vs. 9.5%, respectively (p = 0.113). CONCLUSIONS Overall, despite new therapeutic approaches, ovarian cancer continues to be one of the deadly malignant diseases affecting women, especially in developing countries with a lack of resources, where chemotherapy remains the primary available systemic treatment for the majority of patients. Low survival rates demonstrate the urgent need for more research focused on this group of patients with poor outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilit Harutyunyan
- Department of General Oncology, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, 2 Koryun St., Yerevan 0025, Armenia; (N.K.); (A.A.); (N.M.); (A.M.); (G.J.)
- Oncology Clinic, Mikaelyan Institute of Surgery, Ezras Hasratian 9, Yerevan 0052, Armenia; (A.A.); (A.G.); (M.S.)
| | - Evelina Manvelyan
- Department of Reproductive Biology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA;
| | - Nune Karapetyan
- Department of General Oncology, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, 2 Koryun St., Yerevan 0025, Armenia; (N.K.); (A.A.); (N.M.); (A.M.); (G.J.)
- Clinic of Adults’ Oncology and Chemotherapy at Yeolyan Hematology and Oncology Center, 7 Nersisyan St., Yerevan 0014, Armenia; (S.B.); (L.S.); (D.Z.); (M.H.)
- Immune Oncology Research Institute, 7 Nersisyan St., Yerevan 0014, Armenia;
- Yeolyan Hematology and Oncology Center, 7 Nersisyan St., Yerevan 0014, Armenia;
| | - Samvel Bardakhchyan
- Clinic of Adults’ Oncology and Chemotherapy at Yeolyan Hematology and Oncology Center, 7 Nersisyan St., Yerevan 0014, Armenia; (S.B.); (L.S.); (D.Z.); (M.H.)
- Immune Oncology Research Institute, 7 Nersisyan St., Yerevan 0014, Armenia;
- Yeolyan Hematology and Oncology Center, 7 Nersisyan St., Yerevan 0014, Armenia;
| | - Aram Jilavyan
- National Center of Oncology of Armenia, 76 Fanarjyan St., Yerevan 0052, Armenia; (A.J.); (H.N.); (A.S.); (A.G.)
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Center of Oncology of Armenia, 76 Fanarjyan St., Yerevan 0052, Armenia
| | - Gevorg Tamamyan
- Immune Oncology Research Institute, 7 Nersisyan St., Yerevan 0014, Armenia;
- Yeolyan Hematology and Oncology Center, 7 Nersisyan St., Yerevan 0014, Armenia;
- Pediatric Cancer and Blood Disorders Center of Armenia, 7 Nersisyan St., Yerevan 0014, Armenia
- Pediatric Oncology and Hematology Department, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, 2 Koryun St., Yerevan 0025, Armenia
| | - Armen Avagyan
- Department of General Oncology, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, 2 Koryun St., Yerevan 0025, Armenia; (N.K.); (A.A.); (N.M.); (A.M.); (G.J.)
- Oncology Clinic, Mikaelyan Institute of Surgery, Ezras Hasratian 9, Yerevan 0052, Armenia; (A.A.); (A.G.); (M.S.)
| | - Liana Safaryan
- Clinic of Adults’ Oncology and Chemotherapy at Yeolyan Hematology and Oncology Center, 7 Nersisyan St., Yerevan 0014, Armenia; (S.B.); (L.S.); (D.Z.); (M.H.)
- Yeolyan Hematology and Oncology Center, 7 Nersisyan St., Yerevan 0014, Armenia;
| | - Davit Zohrabyan
- Clinic of Adults’ Oncology and Chemotherapy at Yeolyan Hematology and Oncology Center, 7 Nersisyan St., Yerevan 0014, Armenia; (S.B.); (L.S.); (D.Z.); (M.H.)
- Yeolyan Hematology and Oncology Center, 7 Nersisyan St., Yerevan 0014, Armenia;
| | - Narine Movsisyan
- Department of General Oncology, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, 2 Koryun St., Yerevan 0025, Armenia; (N.K.); (A.A.); (N.M.); (A.M.); (G.J.)
- Oncology Clinic, Mikaelyan Institute of Surgery, Ezras Hasratian 9, Yerevan 0052, Armenia; (A.A.); (A.G.); (M.S.)
- Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, 2 Koryun St., Yerevan 0025, Armenia
- Armenian Association for the Study of Pain, 12 Kievyan Str. Apt. 20, Yerevan 0028, Armenia
| | - Anna Avinyan
- Oncology Clinic, Mikaelyan Institute of Surgery, Ezras Hasratian 9, Yerevan 0052, Armenia; (A.A.); (A.G.); (M.S.)
| | - Arevik Galoyan
- Oncology Clinic, Mikaelyan Institute of Surgery, Ezras Hasratian 9, Yerevan 0052, Armenia; (A.A.); (A.G.); (M.S.)
| | - Mariam Sargsyan
- Oncology Clinic, Mikaelyan Institute of Surgery, Ezras Hasratian 9, Yerevan 0052, Armenia; (A.A.); (A.G.); (M.S.)
- Immune Oncology Research Institute, 7 Nersisyan St., Yerevan 0014, Armenia;
| | - Martin Harutyunyan
- Clinic of Adults’ Oncology and Chemotherapy at Yeolyan Hematology and Oncology Center, 7 Nersisyan St., Yerevan 0014, Armenia; (S.B.); (L.S.); (D.Z.); (M.H.)
- Yeolyan Hematology and Oncology Center, 7 Nersisyan St., Yerevan 0014, Armenia;
| | - Hasmik Nersoyan
- National Center of Oncology of Armenia, 76 Fanarjyan St., Yerevan 0052, Armenia; (A.J.); (H.N.); (A.S.); (A.G.)
- Clinical Research and Cancer Registry Department, National Center of Oncology after V.A. Fanarjian, 76 Fanarjyan St., Yerevan 0052, Armenia
| | - Arevik Stepanyan
- National Center of Oncology of Armenia, 76 Fanarjyan St., Yerevan 0052, Armenia; (A.J.); (H.N.); (A.S.); (A.G.)
- Clinical Research and Cancer Registry Department, National Center of Oncology after V.A. Fanarjian, 76 Fanarjyan St., Yerevan 0052, Armenia
| | - Armenuhi Galstyan
- National Center of Oncology of Armenia, 76 Fanarjyan St., Yerevan 0052, Armenia; (A.J.); (H.N.); (A.S.); (A.G.)
- Diagnostic Service of the National Center of Oncology, 76 Fanarjyan St., Yerevan 0052, Armenia
| | - Samvel Danielyan
- Yeolyan Hematology and Oncology Center, 7 Nersisyan St., Yerevan 0014, Armenia;
| | - Armen Muradyan
- Department of General Oncology, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, 2 Koryun St., Yerevan 0025, Armenia; (N.K.); (A.A.); (N.M.); (A.M.); (G.J.)
| | - Gagik Jilavyan
- Department of General Oncology, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, 2 Koryun St., Yerevan 0025, Armenia; (N.K.); (A.A.); (N.M.); (A.M.); (G.J.)
- National Center of Oncology of Armenia, 76 Fanarjyan St., Yerevan 0052, Armenia; (A.J.); (H.N.); (A.S.); (A.G.)
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Center of Oncology of Armenia, 76 Fanarjyan St., Yerevan 0052, Armenia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhou X, Liu M, Sun L, Cao Y, Tan S, Luo G, Liu T, Yao Y, Xiao W, Wan Z, Tang J. Circulating small extracellular vesicles microRNAs plus CA-125 for treatment stratification in advanced ovarian cancer. J Transl Med 2023; 21:927. [PMID: 38129848 PMCID: PMC10740240 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04774-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND No residual disease (R0 resection) after debulking surgery is the most critical independent prognostic factor for advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). There is an unmet clinical need for selecting primary or interval debulking surgery in AOC patients using existing prediction models. METHODS RNA sequencing of circulating small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) was used to discover the differential expression microRNAs (DEMs) profile between any residual disease (R0, n = 17) and no residual disease (non-R0, n = 20) in AOC patients. We further analyzed plasma samples of AOC patients collected before surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy via TaqMan qRT-PCR. The combined risk model of residual disease was developed by logistic regression analysis based on the discovery-validation sets. RESULTS Using a comprehensive plasma small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) microRNAs (miRNAs) profile in AOC, we identified and optimized a risk prediction model consisting of plasma sEVs-derived 4-miRNA and CA-125 with better performance in predicting R0 resection. Based on 360 clinical human samples, this model was constructed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and logistic regression analysis, and it has favorable calibration and discrimination ability (AUC:0.903; sensitivity:0.897; specificity:0.910; PPV:0.926; NPV:0.871). The quantitative evaluation of Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) and Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) suggested that the additional predictive power of the combined model was significantly improved contrasted with CA-125 or 4-miRNA alone (NRI = 0.471, IDI = 0.538, p < 0.001; NRI = 0.122, IDI = 0.185, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Overall, we established a reliable, non-invasive, and objective detection method composed of circulating tumor-derived sEVs 4-miRNA plus CA-125 to preoperatively anticipate the high-risk AOC patients of residual disease to optimize clinical therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaofang Zhou
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, People's Republic of China
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Cancer Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, People's Republic of China
| | - Mu Liu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, People's Republic of China
| | - Lijuan Sun
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Central Hospital of Shaoyang, Shaoyang, 422000, People's Republic of China
| | - Yumei Cao
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Central Hospital of Shaoyang, Shaoyang, 422000, People's Republic of China
| | - Shanmei Tan
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First People's Hospital of Huaihua, The Affiliated Huaihua Hospital of University of South China, Huaihua, 418000, People's Republic of China
| | - Guangxia Luo
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First People's Hospital of Huaihua, The Affiliated Huaihua Hospital of University of South China, Huaihua, 418000, People's Republic of China
| | - Tingting Liu
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First People's Hospital of Changde, Changde, 415000, People's Republic of China
| | - Ying Yao
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First People's Hospital of Yueyang, Yueyang, 414000, People's Republic of China
| | - Wangli Xiao
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First People's Hospital of Yueyang, Yueyang, 414000, People's Republic of China
| | - Ziqing Wan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, People's Republic of China
| | - Jie Tang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, People's Republic of China.
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hunan Gynecologic Cancer Research Center, Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Address: 283 Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410013, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Andrikopoulou A, Theofanakis C, Markellos C, Kaparelou M, Koutsoukos K, Apostolidou K, Thomakos N, Haidopoulos D, Rodolakis A, Dimopoulos MA, Zagouri F, Liontos M. Optimal Time Interval between Neoadjuvant Platinum-Based Chemotherapy and Interval Debulking Surgery in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3519. [PMID: 37444629 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited data on the optimal time interval between the last dose of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC). METHODS We retrospectively identified patients with stage IIIC/IV HGSC who received NACT followed by IDS during a 15-year period (January 2003-December 2018) in our Institution. RESULTS Overall, 115 patients with stage IIIC/IV HGSC were included. The median age of diagnosis was 62.7 years (IQR: 14.0). A total of 76.5% (88/115) of patients were diagnosed with IIIC HGSC and 23.5% (27/115) with IV HGSC. Median PFS was 15.7 months (95% CI: 13.0-18.5), and median OS was 44.7 months (95% CI: 38.8-50.5). Patients were categorized in groups according to the time interval from NACT to IDS: <4 weeks (group A); 4-5 weeks (group B); 5-6 weeks (group C); >6 weeks (group D). Patients with a time interval IDS to NACT ≥4 weeks had significantly shorter PFS (p = 0.004) and OS (p = 0.002). Median PFS was 26.6 months (95% CI: 24-29.2) for patients undergoing IDS <4 weeks after NACT vs. 14.4 months (95% CI: 12.6-16.2) for those undergoing IDS later (p = 0.004). Accordingly, median OS was 66.3 months (95% CI: 39.1-93.4) vs. 39.4 months (95% CI: 31.8-47.0) in the <4 week vs. >4 week time interval NACT to IDS groups (p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, the short time interval (<4 weeks) from NACT to IDS was an independent factor of PFS (p = 0.004) and OS (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION We have demonstrated that performing IDS within four weeks after NACT may be associated with better survival outcomes. Multidisciplinary coordination among ovarian cancer patients is required to avoid any unnecessary delays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angeliki Andrikopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Charalampos Theofanakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Christos Markellos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Kaparelou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Koutsoukos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Kleoniki Apostolidou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | | | - Flora Zagouri
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Michalis Liontos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, 11528 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shi M, Zhang MJ, Yu Y, Ou R, Wang Y, Li H, Ge RS. Curcumin derivative NL01 induces ferroptosis in ovarian cancer cells via HCAR1/MCT1 signaling. Cell Signal 2023:110791. [PMID: 37406786 DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2023.110791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 06/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Curcumin has been shown to have anti-tumor proliferative properties, but its clinical application is limited by its low bioavailability, etc. Derivatives of curcumin have been developed and tested to improve its therapeutic efficacy. Derivative NL01 could induce ferroptosis through the HCAR1/MCT1 pathway. METHOD CCK-8 was used to detect curcumin and derivative IC50, crystalline violet staining was used to detect the proliferation inhibition effect of NL01 in ovarian cancer, western blot and qPCR were used to detect downstream related molecular expression changes, Transwell and survival curve assays were used to detect malignant phenotypic. RESULTS NL01 inhibited cell growth of Anglne and HO8910PM ovarian cancer cells by 13 times more potent than curcumin and induced ferroptosis of these two cells. we found that NL01 was able to reduce the expression of HCAR1/MCT1 and activate the AMPK signaling pathway, which in turn induced cellular ferroptosis via SREBP1 pathway. Knock-down HCAR1 expression revealed similar phenotype and pathway alterations to NL01 treatment. HCAR1 overexpression promoted a malignant phenotype and resistance to cisplatin in both cancer cells, whereas knockdown of HCAR1 showed the opposite phenotype. Subcutaneous transplantation tumor experiments in nude mice also showed that NL01 induced iron death and inhibited ovarian cancer proliferation. Further study showed that NL01 promoted the downregulation of GPX4 expression, which is related to ferroptosis, and that addition of ferrostatin-1 partially reversed NL01-mediated inhibition of the growth of two cell lines. CONCLUSION NL01 exhibits better anti-tumor growth properties than curcumin, and NL01 induces ferroptosis in ovarian cancer cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengna Shi
- Department of Anaesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325027, China; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325027, China
| | - Min-Jie Zhang
- Department of Anaesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325027, China; Key Laboratory of Structural Malformations in Children of Zhejiang Province and Key Laboratory of Environment and Male Reproductive Medicine of Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, China
| | - Yang Yu
- Department of Anaesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325027, China
| | - Rongying Ou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325027, China
| | - Yiyan Wang
- Department of Anaesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325027, China
| | - Huitao Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325027, China
| | - Ren-Shan Ge
- Department of Anaesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325027, China; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325027, China; Key Laboratory of Structural Malformations in Children of Zhejiang Province and Key Laboratory of Environment and Male Reproductive Medicine of Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu X, Zhao Y, Jiao X, Yu Y, Li R, Zeng S, Chi J, Ma G, Huo Y, Li M, Peng Z, Liu J, Zhou Q, Zou D, Wang L, Li Q, Wang J, Yao S, Chen Y, Ma D, Hu T, Gao Q. Timing of interval debulking surgery and postoperative chemotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a multicenter real-world study. J Ovarian Res 2023; 16:121. [PMID: 37370087 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-023-01164-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the prognostic relevance of the time to interval debulking surgery (TTS) and the time to postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (TTC) after the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). METHODS A retrospective real-word study included 658 patients with histologically confirmed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer who received NACT at seven tertiary hospitals in China from June 2008 to June 2020. TTS was defined as the time interval from the completion of NACT to the time of interval debulking surgery (IDS). TTC was defined as the time interval from the completion of NACT to the initiation of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (PACT). RESULTS The median TTS and TTC were 25 (IQR, 20-29) and 40 (IQR, 33-49) days, respectively. Patients with TTS > 25 days were older (55 vs. 53 years, P = 0.012) and received more NACT cycles (median, 3 vs. 2, P = 0.002). Similar results were observed in patients with TTC > 40 days. In the multivariate analyses, TTS and TTC were not associated with PFS when stratified by median, quartile, or integrated as continuous variables (all P > 0.05). However, TTS and TTC were significantly associated with worse OS when stratified by median (P = 0.018 and 0.018, respectively), quartile (P = 0.169, 0.014, 0.027 and 0.012, 0.001, 0.033, respectively), or integrated as continuous variables (P = 0.018 and 0.011, respectively). Similarly, increasing TTS and TTC intervals were associated with a higher risk of death (Ptrend = 0.016 and 0.031, respectively) but not with recurrence (Ptrend = 0.103 and 0.381, respectively). CONCLUSION The delays of IDS and PACT after the completion of NACT have adverse impacts on OS but no impacts on PFS, which indicates that reducing delays of IDS and PACT might ameliorate the outcomes of ovarian cancer patients treated with NACT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingyu Liu
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yingjun Zhao
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiaofei Jiao
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yang Yu
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ruyuan Li
- Cancer Hospital, National Cancer Center, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shaoqing Zeng
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jianhua Chi
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Guanchen Ma
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yabing Huo
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ming Li
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zikun Peng
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jiahao Liu
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Qi Zhou
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Research for Cancer Metastasis and Individualized Treatment, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
- Key Laboratory for Biorheological Science and Technology of Ministry of Education (Chongqing University), Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Dongling Zou
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Research for Cancer Metastasis and Individualized Treatment, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
- Key Laboratory for Biorheological Science and Technology of Ministry of Education (Chongqing University), Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Li Wang
- Department of Cancer Biology Immunotherapy, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Qingshui Li
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Hunan Clinical Research Center in Gynecologic Cancer, Hunan Cancer Hospital and The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Department of Gynecologic Cancer, Hunan Cancer Hospital and The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Shuzhong Yao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Youguo Chen
- Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Ding Ma
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ting Hu
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
- Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, 430000, China.
| | - Qinglei Gao
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
- Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, 430000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nagao S, Tamura J, Shibutani T, Miwa M, Kato T, Shikama A, Takei Y, Kamiya N, Inoue N, Nakamura K, Inoue A, Yamamoto K, Fujiwara K, Suzuki M. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: GOTIC-019 study. Int J Clin Oncol 2023; 28:804-815. [PMID: 37140771 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-023-02329-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Three randomized controlled trials have resulted in extremely extensive application of the strategy of using neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in Japan. This study aimed to evaluate the status and effectiveness of treatment strategies using NAC followed by IDS in Japanese clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a multi-institutional observational study of 940 women with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer treated at one of nine centers between 2010 and 2015. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between 486 propensity-score matched participants who underwent NAC followed by IDS and primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS Patients with FIGO stage IIIC receiving NAC had a shorter OS (median OS: 48.1 vs. 68.2 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.82, p = 0.06) but not PFS (median PFS: 19.7 vs. 19.4 months, HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.80-1.31, p = 0.88). However, patients with FIGO stage IV receiving NAC and PDS had comparable PFS (median PFS: 16.6 vs. 14.7 months, HR: 1.07 95% CI: 0.74-1.53, p = 0.73) and OS (median PFS: 45.2 vs. 35.7 months, HR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.65-1.47, p = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS NAC followed by IDS did not improve survival. In patients with FIGO stage IIIC, NAC may be associated with a shorter OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoji Nagao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan.
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, 13-70 Kitaoji-cho, Akashi, Hyogo, 673-8558, Japan.
| | - Jun Tamura
- Department of Biostatistics, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Takashi Shibutani
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, 13-70 Kitaoji-cho, Akashi, Hyogo, 673-8558, Japan
| | - Maiko Miwa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Yamane, Hidaka, 1397-1, Japan
| | - Tomoyasu Kato
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ayumi Shikama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Yuji Takei
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Japan
| | - Natsuko Kamiya
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Naoki Inoue
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gunma University, 3-39-15 Showa-cho, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Kazuto Nakamura
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center, 617-1 Takabayashi-cho, Ota, Japan
| | - Aya Inoue
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ehime University School of Medicine, 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Japan
| | - Koji Yamamoto
- Department of Biostatistics, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Keiichi Fujiwara
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Yamane, Hidaka, 1397-1, Japan
| | - Mitsuaki Suzuki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shin-Yurigaoka General Hospital, 255 Furusawatsuko, Asao-ku, Kawasaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sundar S, Nordin A, Morrison J, Wood N, Ghaem-Maghami S, Nieto J, Phillips A, Butler J, Burton K, Gornall R, Dobbs S, Glasspool R, Peevor R, Ledermann J, McNeish I, Ratnavelu N, Duncan T, Frost J, Lim K, Michael A, Brockbank E, Gajjar K, Taylor A, Bowen R, Andreou A, Ganesan R, Nicum S, Edmondson R, Clayton R, Balega J, Rolland P, Maxwell H, Fotopoulou C. British Gynaecological Cancer Society Recommendations for Evidence Based, Population Data Derived Quality Performance Indicators for Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:337. [PMID: 36672287 PMCID: PMC9856668 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer survival in the UK lags behind comparable countries. Results from the ongoing National Ovarian Cancer Audit feasibility pilot (OCAFP) show that approximately 1 in 4 women with advanced ovarian cancer (Stage 2, 3, 4 and unstaged cancer) do not receive any anticancer treatment and only 51% in England receive international standard of care treatment, i.e., the combination of surgery and chemotherapy. The audit has also demonstrated wide variation in the percentage of women receiving anticancer treatment for advanced ovarian cancer, be it surgery or chemotherapy across the 19 geographical regions for organisation of cancer delivery (Cancer Alliances). Receipt of treatment also correlates with survival: 5 year Cancer survival varies from 28.6% to 49.6% across England. Here, we take a systems wide approach encompassing both diagnostic pathways and cancer treatment, derived from the whole cohort of women with ovarian cancer to set out recommendations and quality performance indicators (QPI). A multidisciplinary panel established by the British Gynaecological Cancer Society carefully identified QPI against criteria: metrics selected were those easily evaluable nationally using routinely available data and where there was a clear evidence base to support interventions. These QPI will be valuable to other taxpayer funded systems with national data collection mechanisms and are to our knowledge the only population level data derived standards in ovarian cancer. We also identify interventions for Best practice and Research recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudha Sundar
- Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital and Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B152TT, UK
| | - Andy Nordin
- East Kent Hospitals University Foundation NHS Trust, Ethelburt Road, Canterbury CT1 3NG, UK
- National Cancer Registration & Analysis Service (NCRAS), NHS Digital, Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Rd., London SE1 8UG, UK
| | - Jo Morrison
- GRACE Centre, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Musgrove Park Hospital, Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton TA1 5DA, UK
| | - Nick Wood
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston PR7 1PP, UK
| | | | - Jo Nieto
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK
| | - Andrew Phillips
- Derby Gynaecological Cancer Centre, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton, Royal Derby Hospital, Uttoxeter Rd., Derby DE22 3NE, UK
| | - John Butler
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Kevin Burton
- Glasgow Royal Infirmary, PRMH Building, Glasgow G4 0SF, UK
| | - Rob Gornall
- Department Gynaecological Oncology, Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester GL53 7AN, UK
| | - Stephen Dobbs
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast BT9 7AB, UK
| | - Rosalind Glasspool
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 0YN, UK
| | - Richard Peevor
- Consultant Gynaecological Oncologist, Clinical Lead for Colposcopy & Gynaecological Cancer MDT, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor LL57 2PW, UK
| | - Jonathan Ledermann
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London and UCL Hospitals, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Iain McNeish
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK
| | - Nithya Ratnavelu
- Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead NE9 6SX, UK
| | - Tim Duncan
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK
| | - Jonathan Frost
- Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | | | - Agnieszka Michael
- University of Surrey and Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
| | - Elly Brockbank
- Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London EC1 1BB, UK
| | - Ketankumar Gajjar
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| | | | - Rebecca Bowen
- Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | - Adrian Andreou
- Department of Radiology, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | - Raji Ganesan
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Birmingham Women’s Hospital, Birmingham SY16 4LE, UK
| | - Shibani Nicum
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London and UCL Hospitals, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Richard Edmondson
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester and St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Richard Clayton
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Janos Balega
- Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, West Midlands, Birmingham B15 2SQ, UK
| | - Phil Rolland
- Department Gynaecological Oncology, Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester GL53 7AN, UK
| | - Hilary Maxwell
- Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Dorset DT1 2JY, UK
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Marrelli D, Ansaloni L, Federici O, Asero S, Carbone L, Marano L, Baiocchi G, Vaira M, Coccolini F, Di Giorgio A, Framarini M, Gelmini R, Palopoli C, Accarpio F, Fagotti A. Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and HIPEC for Advanced Ovarian Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases: Italian PSM Oncoteam Evidence and Study Purposes. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:6010. [PMID: 36497490 PMCID: PMC9740463 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14236010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Revised: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the eighth most common neoplasm in women with a high mortality rate mainly due to a marked propensity for peritoneal spread directly at diagnosis, as well as tumor recurrence after radical surgical treatment. Treatments for peritoneal metastases have to be designed from a patient's perspective and focus on meaningful measures of benefit. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), a strategy combining maximal cytoreductive surgery with regional chemotherapy, has been proposed to treat advanced ovarian cancer. Preliminary results to date have shown promising results, with improved survival outcomes and tumor regression. As knowledge about the disease process increases, practice guidelines will continue to evolve. In this review, we have reported a broad overview of advanced ovarian cancer management, and an update of the current evidence. The future perspectives of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology (SICO) are discussed conclusively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Marrelli
- Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- Unit of General Surgery San Matteo Hospital, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Orietta Federici
- Surgical Oncology, Peritoneum and Abdomen Pathologies, National Cancer Institute Regina Elena, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Asero
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, Soft Tissue Tumors, Department of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale e di Alta Specializzazione Garibaldi, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Ludovico Carbone
- Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Luigi Marano
- Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Gianluca Baiocchi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Marco Vaira
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO–IRCCS, Candiolo, 10060 Torino, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, 56122 Pisa, Italy
| | - Andrea Di Giorgio
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli–IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Framarini
- Surgery and Advanced Oncological Therapy Unit, Ospedale GB. Morgagni-L. Pierantoni, AUSL Forlì, 47121 Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Roberta Gelmini
- Unit of Emergency General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, AOU Policlinico di Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Carmen Palopoli
- Unit of PSG and OBI, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria G. Martino, 98124 Messina, Italy
| | - Fabio Accarpio
- CRS and HIPEC Unit, Pietro Valdoni, Umberto I Policlinico di Roma, 00161 Roma, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Unit of Ovarian Carcinoma, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli–IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Meena RK, Syed NA, Sheikh ZA, Guru FR, Mir MH, Banday SZ, MP AK, Parveen S, Dar NA, Bhat GM. Patterns of Treatment and Outcomes in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective North Indian Single-Institution Experience. JCO Glob Oncol 2022; 8:e2200032. [PMID: 36332174 PMCID: PMC9668559 DOI: 10.1200/go.22.00032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Ovarian cancer (OC) is ranked as the third most common gynecologic cancer in various Indian cancer registries. In India, OC is seen in the younger age group, with a median age < 55 years being reported by most of the studies. The majority of patients are diagnosed in advanced stage (70%-80%), where the long-term (10-year) survival rate is poor, estimated at 15%-30%. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical epidemiology, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes in patients with epithelial OC. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of patients with epithelial OC who were treated at Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, over a period of 9 years, from January 2010 to December 2018. RESULTS OC constituted 2.94% of all cancers registered. Epithelial OC constituted 88.4% of all OCs, with a median age 50 years. More than two third of patients belonged to rural background and the majority (76.9%) of the patients were in stage III or IV at the time of diagnosis. The main presenting symptoms were abdominal distension/bloating (46.5%) and gastrointestinal disturbances (35.2%). The most common histologic types were serous (65.9%) followed by mucinous carcinoma (15%). Median overall survival for the whole study cohort was 30 months (95% CI, 28.0 to 31.9). Median overall survival for stage I, II, III, and IV was 72, 60, 30, and 20 months, respectively. CONCLUSION Most of the patients presented in advanced stage of the disease and have poor outcome. Delay in diagnosis and improper management before registering in tertiary cancer center and lack of tertiary care facilities are the root causes of poor outcomes. The general population and primary care physicians need to be made aware of OC symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajendra Kumar Meena
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Soura, Srinagar, India
| | - Nisar Ahmad Syed
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Soura, Srinagar, India,Nisar Ahmad Syed, MD, DM, Department of Medical Oncology, Sheri Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), State Cancer Institute Building, Srinagar, UT Jammu & Kashmir, 190011, India;
| | - Zahoor Ahmad Sheikh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Soura, Srinagar, India
| | - Faisal Rashid Guru
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Soura, Srinagar, India
| | - Mohmad Hussain Mir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Soura, Srinagar, India
| | - Saquib Zaffar Banday
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Soura, Srinagar, India
| | - Arun Krishnan MP
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Soura, Srinagar, India
| | - Shaheena Parveen
- Department of Gastroentrology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Soura, Srinagar, India
| | - Nazir Ahmad Dar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Soura, Srinagar, India
| | - Gull Mohammad Bhat
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Soura, Srinagar, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tzanis AA, Iavazzo C, Hadjivasilis A, Tsouvali H, Antoniou GΑ, Antoniou SA. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Primary Debulking Surgery in FIGO Stage III and IV Epithelial Ovarian, Tubal or Peritoneal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Oncol Rev 2022; 16:10605. [PMID: 36531160 PMCID: PMC9756845 DOI: 10.3389/or.2022.10605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) confers superior outcomes compared to primary debulking surgery (PDS) in patients with stage III and IV epithelial ovarian, tubal or peritoneal cancer as well as in patients with high tumour load. Methods: We searched the electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials, and Scopus from inception to March 2021. We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NACT with PDS for women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) stages III and IV. The primary outcomes were overall survival and progression-free survival. Secondary outcomes were optimal cytoreduction rates, peri-operative adverse events, and quality of life. Results: Six RCTs with a total of 1901 participants were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated similar overall survival (HR = 0.96, 95% CI [0.86-1.07]) and progression-free survival (HR = 0.98, 95% CI [0.89-1.08]) between NACT and PDS. Subgroup analyses did not demonstrate higher survival for stage IV patients (HR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.71-1.09]) nor for patients with metastatic lesions >5 cm (HR = 0.86, 95% CI [0.69-1.08]) treated with NACT, albeit with some uncertainty due to imprecision. Similarly, no survival benefit was observed in the subgroup of patients with metastatic lesions >10 cm (HR = 0.94, 95% CI [0.78-1.12]). NACT was associated with significantly higher rates of complete cytoreduction (RR = 2.34, 95% CI [1.48-3.71]). Severe peri-operative adverse events were less frequent in the NACT arm (RR = 0.34, 95% CI [0.16-0.72]. Conclusion: Patients with stage III and IV epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing NACT or PDS have similar overall survival. NACT is likely associated with higher rates of complete cytoreduction and lower risk of severe adverse events and peri-operative death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander A. Tzanis
- Department of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
- Department of Surgery, Filiates General Hospital, Filiates, Greece
| | | | - Alexandros Hadjivasilis
- First Department of Medical Oncology, Agios Savvas Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece
- Cyprus International Institute for Environmental and Public Health, Cyprus University of Technology Limassol, Cyprus, Greece
| | | | - George Α. Antoniou
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nikolaidi A, Fountzilas E, Fostira F, Psyrri A, Gogas H, Papadimitriou C. Neoadjuvant treatment in ovarian cancer: New perspectives, new challenges. Front Oncol 2022; 12:820128. [PMID: 35957909 PMCID: PMC9360510 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.820128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer remains the leading cause of death from gynecological cancer. Survival is significantly related to the stage of the disease at diagnosis. Of quite importance is primary cytoreductive surgery, having as a goal to remove all visible tumor tissue, and is the standard primary treatment in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been implemented mostly in treating advanced disease, with studies performed having numerous limitations. Data extrapolated from these studies have not shown inferiority survival of NACT, compared to primary debulking surgery. The role of NACT is of particular interest because of the intrinsic mechanisms that are involved in the process, which can be proven as therapeutic approaches with enormous potential. NACT increases immune infiltration and programmed death ligand-1 (PDL-1) expression, induces local immune activation, and can potentiate the immunogenicity of immune-exclude high grade serous ovarian tumors, while the combination of NACT with bevacizumab, PARP inhibitors or immunotherapy remains to be evaluated. This article summarizes all available data on studies implementing NACT in the treatment of ovarian cancer, focusing on clinical outcomes and study limitations. High mortality rates observed among ovarian cancer patients necessitates the identification of more effective treatments, along with biomarkers that will aid treatment individualization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adamantia Nikolaidi
- Oncology Department, Private General Maternity, Gynecological and Pediatric Clinic “MITERA“ Hospital, Athens, Greece
- *Correspondence: Adamantia Nikolaidi,
| | - Elena Fountzilas
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, Euromedica General Clinic of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
- European University Cyprus, Engomi, Cyprus
| | - Florentia Fostira
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, National Centre for Scientific Research ‘Demokritos’, Athens, Greece
| | - Amanda Psyrri
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, “Attikon” Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Helen Gogas
- First Department of Medicine, ‘Laiko’ General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Christos Papadimitriou
- Oncology Unit, Second Department of Surgery, “Aretaieion” University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Application Value of Combined Detection of DCE-MRI and Serum Tumor Markers HE4, Ki67, and HK10 in the Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer. CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING 2022; 2022:1533261. [PMID: 35815060 PMCID: PMC9213144 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1533261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objective To investigate the application value of the combined detection of DCE-MRI and serum tumor markers (HE4, Ki67, and HK10) in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Methods The clinical data of 40 patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) confirmed by surgery and pathology in our hospital from February 2019 to February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received DCE-MRI, the detection of serum tumor markers HE4, Ki67, and HK10, and the combined detection of DCE-MRI and the serum tumor markers (HE4, Ki67, and HK10). The application value of the three detection methods was analyzed. Results The number of true positives in the single detection (DCE-MRI detection and the detection of serum HE4, Ki67, and HK10) was notably lower than that in the combined detection. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the single detection were notably lower compared with the combined detection. The area under the curve in the ROC of the combined detection was notably larger than that of the single detection. The results of the combined detection were better than those of the single detection (P < 0.05), with the highest sensitivity of the combined detection. Conclusion The combined detection of DCE-MRI and the serum tumor markers (HE4, Ki67, and HK10) can effectively improve the diagnostic accuracy of AOC patients, with high sensitivity and specificity, which has an important diagnostic value in clinic.
Collapse
|
15
|
Virani S, Baiocchi G, Bowtell D, Cabasag CJ, Cho KR, Fortner RT, Fujiwara K, Kim JW, Köbel M, Kurtz JE, Levine DA, Menon U, Norquist BM, Pharoah PDP, Sood AK, Tworoger ST, Wentzensen N, Chanock SJ, Brennan P, Trabert B. Joint IARC/NCI International Cancer Seminar Series Report: expert consensus on future directions for ovarian carcinoma research. Carcinogenesis 2021; 42:785-793. [PMID: 34037709 PMCID: PMC8427725 DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgab043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Recently, ovarian cancer research has evolved considerably because of the emerging recognition that rather than a single disease, ovarian carcinomas comprise several different histotypes that vary by etiologic origin, risk factors, molecular profiles, therapeutic approaches and clinical outcome. Despite significant progress in our understanding of the etiologic heterogeneity of ovarian cancer, as well as important clinical advances, it remains the eighth most frequently diagnosed cancer in women worldwide and the most fatal gynecologic cancer. The International Agency for Research on Cancer and the United States National Cancer Institute jointly convened an expert panel on ovarian carcinoma to develop consensus research priorities based on evolving scientific discoveries. Expertise ranged from etiology, prevention, early detection, pathology, model systems, molecular characterization and treatment/clinical management. This report summarizes the current state of knowledge and highlights expert consensus on future directions to continue advancing etiologic, epidemiologic and prognostic research on ovarian carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shama Virani
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Genomic Epidemiology Branch, Lyon, France
| | - Glauco Baiocchi
- Department of Gynecology Oncology, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - David Bowtell
- Women’s Cancer Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Citadel J Cabasag
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Kathleen R Cho
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Renée T Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Keiichi Fujiwara
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jae-Weon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz
- Department of Medical and Surgical Oncology and Hematology, Strasbourg Cancer Institute (ICANS-Europe), Strasbourg, France
| | - Douglas A Levine
- Gynecologic Oncology, Laura and Isaac Pearlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC CTU at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Barbara M Norquist
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Department of Oncology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shelley T Tworoger
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stephen J Chanock
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Paul Brennan
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Genomic Epidemiology Branch, Lyon, France
| | - Britton Trabert
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jiang C, Li Z. Performance validation of the Mayo triage algorithm applied to individualize surgical management of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 162:339-344. [PMID: 34147283 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To externally validate the performance of the Mayo triage algorithm applied to treatment strategy management in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AEOC) patients. METHODS AEOC patients who underwent primary debulking surgery (PDS) were included and were divided into two groups based on the Mayo triage algorithm: "high risk" and "triage appropriate". The surgery outcomes and complications of the patients were compared between the two groups. RESULTS 179 consecutive AEOC patients were enrolled for analysis, including 32 patients in the high-risk group and 147 patients in the triage-appropriate group. The results showed that patients in the high-risk group were older, had worse physical status and had lower preoperative serum albumin than those in the triage-appropriate group (P<0.01). The high-risk group had a lower proportion of women who underwent intermediate/high complexity surgery (38% vs. 72%, P<0.01) as well as a lower proportion of women who underwent optimal resection (50% vs. 71%, P<0.05). Furthermore, the incidence of 30-day complications (28% vs. 5%, P<0.01) and the proportion of patients who were unable to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy after PDS (22% vs. 2%, P<0.01) were both significantly higher in the high-risk group than in the triage-appropriate group. In addition, compared to the triage-appropriate group, the 90-day mortality rate in the high-risk group was also notably higher, but the difference was not statistically significant (6% vs. 1%, P=0.15). CONCLUSION The validity of the Mayo triage algorithm for treatment decision-making in AEOC was externally confirmed in this study. This short-term complication assessment tool could be effectively used for the individualized primary management of high-risk AEOC patients. The feasibility of the Mayo triage algorithm for use in long-term management should be further explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caixia Jiang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China,; Key Laboratory of Obstetrics and Gynecologic and Pediatric Diseases and Birth Defects of Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhengyu Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China,; Key Laboratory of Obstetrics and Gynecologic and Pediatric Diseases and Birth Defects of Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China,.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kim SI, Kim JW. Role of surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100149. [PMID: 33984680 PMCID: PMC8314869 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is one of the deadliest gynaecological malignancies and tends to be diagnosed at an advanced stage. Similar to many malignancies, surgery plays a critical role in many aspects of ovarian cancer management. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) involves the induction of hyperthermia and delivery of intraperitoneal chemotherapy directly into the peritoneal cavity. Combined with cytoreductive surgery, HIPEC is an emerging treatment modality for ovarian cancer. Ovarian cancer survival outcomes can be improved by treatment with surgery and HIPEC in selected patients. Thus, this study aimed to review the current role of surgery and HIPEC in epithelial ovarian cancer. Evidence from the monumental and recent literature will be introduced. Surgery plays a critical role in many aspects of ovarian cancer management. Combined with cytoreductive surgery, HIPEC is an emerging modality for ovarian cancer. Improvement of survival outcomes is expected by applying individualised surgery and HIPEC for each ovarian cancer patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S I Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - J-W Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Shi T, Zhu J, Feng Y, Tu D, Zhang Y, Zhang P, Jia H, Huang X, Cai Y, Yin S, Jiang R, Tian W, Gao W, Liu J, Yang H, Cheng X, Zang R. Secondary cytoreduction followed by chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (SOC-1): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:439-449. [PMID: 33705695 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00006-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits of secondary cytoreduction for platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer are still widely debated. We aimed to assess the efficacy of secondary cytoreduction plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in this patient population. METHODS This multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial (SOC-1), was done in four primarily academic centres in China (two in Shanghai, one in Hangzhou, and one in Guangzhou). Eligible patients were women aged 18 years and older with platinum-sensitive relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer with a platinum-free interval of at least 6 months after the end of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and were predicted to have potentially resectable disease according to the international model (iMODEL) score and PET-CT imaging. iMODEL score was calculated using six variables: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, residual disease after primary surgery, platinum-free interval, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, serum level of cancer antigen 125 at recurrence, and presence of ascites at recurrence. An iMODEL score of 4·7 or lower predicted a potentially complete resection. As per a protocol amendment, patients with an iMODEL score of more than 4·7 could only be included if the serum level of cancer antigen 125 was more than 105 U/mL, but the principal investigators assessed the disease to be resectable by PET-CT. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) via a permuted block design (block size of six) and stratified by study centre, iMODEL score, residual disease at primary surgery, and enrolment in the Shanghai Gynecologic Oncology Group SUNNY trial, to undergo secondary cytoreductive surgery followed by intravenous chemotherapy (six 3-weekly cycles of intravenous paclitaxel [175 mg/m2] or docetaxel [75 mg/m2] combined with intravenous carboplatin [area under the curve of 5 mg/mL per min]; surgery group) or intravenous chemotherapy alone (no surgery group). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival, analysed in all participants randomly assigned to treatment, regardless of treatment received (intention-to-treat [ITT] population). Here, we report the final analysis of progression-free survival and the prespecified interim analysis of overall survival. Safety was assessed in all participants who received their assigned treatment and had available adverse event data. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01611766, and is ongoing but closed to accrual. FINDINGS Between July 19, 2012, and June 3, 2019, 357 patients were recruited and randomly assigned to the surgery group (182) or the no surgery group (175; ITT population). Median follow-up was 36·0 months (IQR 18·1-58·3). In the no surgery group, 11 (6%) of 175 participants had secondary cytoreduction during second-line therapy while 48 (37%) of 130 participants who had disease progression crossed-over and had surgery at a subsequent recurrence. Median progression-free survival was 17·4 months (95% CI 15·0-19·8) in the surgery group and 11·9 months (10·0-13·8) in the no surgery group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·58; 95% CI 0·45-0·74; p<0·0001). At the interim overall survival analysis, median overall survival was 58·1 months (95% CI not estimable to not estimable) in the surgery group and 53·9 months (42·2-65·5) in the no surgery group (HR 0·82, 95% CI 0·57-1·19). In the safety population, nine (5%) of 172 patients in the surgery group had grade 3-4 surgical morbidity at 30 days, and no patients in either group had died at 60 days after receiving assigned treatment. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events during chemotherapy were neutropenia (29 [17%] of 166 patients in the surgery group vs 19 [12%] of 156 patients in the no surgery group), leucopenia (14 [8%] vs eight [5%]), and anaemia (ten [6%] vs nine [6%]). Four serious adverse events occurred, all in the surgery group. No treatment-related deaths occurred in either group. INTERPRETATION Secondary cytoreduction followed by chemotherapy was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival than was chemotherapy alone in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer, and patients should be counselled about the option of secondary cytoreduction in specialised centres. Long-term survival outcomes will be assessed using mature data on overall survival. FUNDING Zhongshan Development Program. TRANSLATION For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingyan Shi
- Ovarian Cancer Program, Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianqing Zhu
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China
| | - Yanling Feng
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dongsheng Tu
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Yuqin Zhang
- Ovarian Cancer Program, Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ping Zhang
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China
| | - Huixun Jia
- Clinical Statistics Centre, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao Huang
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Yunlang Cai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Zhongda Hospital Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Sheng Yin
- Ovarian Cancer Program, Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Rong Jiang
- Ovarian Cancer Program, Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenjuan Tian
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen Gao
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China
| | - Jihong Liu
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huijuan Yang
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Xi Cheng
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Rongyu Zang
- Ovarian Cancer Program, Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|