Gastroesophageal reflux disease. The long and the short of therapeutic options

[Differentiation therapy for non-acidic gastroesophageal reflux disease]

AIM

To investigate the clinical and pathogenetic features of the non-acidic types of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and to evaluate the impact of combined therapy versus monotherapy on the course of this disease.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The investigation enrolled 62 patients with non-acidic GERD. The follow-up period was 6 weeks. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 1) weakly acidic gastroesophageal refluxes (GER); 2) weakly alkaline GER. Then each group was distributed, thus making up 4 groups: 1) 19 patients with weakly acidic GER who received monotherapy with rabeprazole 20 mg/day; 2) 21 patients with weakly acidic GER had combined therapy with rabeprazole 20 mg and itopride; 3) 8 patients with weakly alkaline GER who received ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) monotherapy; and 4) 14 patients with weakly alkaline GER who had combined therapy with UDCA and itopride, The clinical symptoms of the disease, the endoscopic pattern of the upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT) mucosa, histological changes in the esophageal and gastric mucosa, and the results of 24-hour impedance pH monitoring were assessed over time.

RESULTS

During differentiation therapy, the majority of patients reported positive clinical changes and an improved or unchanged endoscopic pattern. Assessment of impedance pH monitoring results revealed decreases in the overall number of GERs, the presence of a bolus in the esophagus, and the number of proximal refluxes. These changes were noted not only in patients taking proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), but also in those treated with UDCA monotherapy or combined PPI and prokinetic therapy.

CONCLUSION

A differentiated approach to non-acidic GER treatment contributes to its efficiency. Adding the prokinetic itomed (itopride hydrochloride) to PPI therapy in a patient with weakly acidic GER enhances the efficiency of treatment, by positively affecting upper GIT motility. The mainstay of therapy for GERD with a predominance of weakly alkaline refluxes is UDCA, the combination of the latter and the prokinetic can exert a more pronounced effect on the clinical and endoscopic pattern and upper GIT motility.

Synergistic and antagonistic pharmacodynamic interaction between ranitidine and cisapride: a study on the isolated rabbit intestine

The present study examines the pharmacodynamic interaction between the H(2)-receptor antagonist ranitidine and the prokinetic agent cisapride on the isolated rabbit intestine. Ranitidine produced a concentration-dependent contractile effect on the duodenal, ileal and ascending colon preparations, with EC(50)values of 1.35 x 10(-4)M for the duodenum, 1.2 x 10(-4)M for the ileum and 1.15 x 10(-4)M for the ascending colon. The effect of cisapride on the ranitidine contractile effect was dependent on the cisapride concentration used. Thus, cisapride, at concentrations from 10(-10)up to 5 x 10(-7)for the duodenum and the ascending colon and up to 10(-6)M for the ileum, potentiated the contractile responses of the preparations to ranitidine. However, at higher concentrations cisapride produced a non-competitive inhibition of the intestinal contractile responses to ranitidine with IC(50)values of 4.2 x 10(-5)M for the duodenum, 1.65 x 10(-5)M for the ileum and 3.2 x 10(-6)M for the ascending colon. These data show that cisapride may modify the contractile responses of the isolated rabbit intestine to ranitidine, having a potentiating effect up to a certain concentration and an antagonistic one at higher concentrations. In conclusion, co-administration of the above drugs may lead to enhanced or reduced intestinal motility.

Review article: alginate-raft formulations in the treatment of heartburn and acid reflux

Alginate-based raft-forming formulations have been marketed word-wide for over 30 years under various brand names, including Gaviscon. They are used for the symptomatic treatment of heartburn and oesophagitis, and appear to act by a unique mechanism which differs from that of traditional antacids. In the presence of gastric acid, alginates precipitate, forming a gel. Alginate-based raft-forming formulations usually contain sodium or potassium bicarbonate; in the presence of gastric acid, the bicarbonate is converted to carbon dioxide which becomes entrapped within the gel precipitate, converting it into a foam which floats on the surface of the gastric contents, much like a raft on water. Both in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that alginate-based rafts can entrap carbon dioxide, as well as antacid components contained in some formulations, thus providing a relatively pH-neutral barrier. Several studies have demonstrated that the alginate raft can preferentially move into the oesophagus in place, or ahead, of acidic gastric contents during episodes of gastro-oesophageal reflux; some studies further suggest that the raft can act as a physical barrier to reduce reflux episodes. Although some alginate-based formulations also contain antacid components which can provide significant acid neutralization capacity, the efficacy of these formulations to reduce heartburn symptoms does not appear to be totally dependent on the neutralization of bulk gastric contents. The strength of the alginate raft is dependant on several factors, including the amount of carbon dioxide generated and entrapped in the raft, the molecular properties of the alginate, and the presence of aluminium or calcium in the antacid components of the formulation. Raft formation occurs rapidly, often within a few seconds of dosing; hence alginate-containing antacids are comparable to traditional antacids for speed of onset of relief. Since the raft can be retained in the stomach for several hours, alginate-based raft-forming formulations can additionally provide longer-lasting relief than that of traditional antacids. Indeed, clinical studies have shown Gaviscon is superior to placebo, and equal to or significantly better than traditional antacids for relieving heartburn symptoms. Alginate-based, raft-forming formulations have been used to treat reflux symptoms in infants and children, and in the management of heartburn and reflux during pregnancy. While Gaviscon is effective when used alone, it is compatible with, and does not interfere with the activity of antisecretory agents such as cimetidine. Even with the introduction of new antisecretory and promotility agents, alginate-rafting formulations will continue to have a role in the treatment of heartburn and reflux symptoms. Their unique non-systemic mechanism of action provides rapid and long-duration relief of heartburn and acid reflux symptoms.

Cisapride: a survey of the frequency of use and adverse events in premature newborns

OBJECTIVE

This survey estimated the frequency of use and adverse events associated with cisapride treatment of premature newborns in intensive care units. It was initiated in response to a warning issued in Canada cautioning against cisapride treatment of premature infants of <36 weeks' gestation and <3 months of age.

METHODOLOGY

Surveys were mailed to 105 neonatology training program directors to obtain the total number of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions, the number of admissions of infants of <36 weeks' gestation, the number of years that cisapride had been used, the estimated percent/number of premature patients treated with cisapride per year, and the frequency and nature of arrhythmias or other adverse events associated with cisapride treatment. Of 105 programs, 46 responded to a single mailing of the first survey. A second survey mailed to the 45 respondents to the first survey sought to determine the indications, diagnostic tests, and dosages used with cisapride treatment of premature newborns. Of the 45 programs, 26 responded to the second survey.

RESULTS

More than 58 000 premature newborns of <36 weeks' gestation were admitted to the NICUs we surveyed, and approximately 19% were treated with cisapride. No deaths attributable to cisapride were reported among >11 000 preterm newborns treated. Three nonfatal arrhythmias were reported; two associated with 10-fold dosing errors and one with co-treatment with erythromycin, a macrolide antibiotic that reduces the metabolism of cisapride. Diarrhea was reported in 12 patients, and reversible liver enzyme changes were noted in one patient. Typically, cisapride treatment was started in dosages of 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg/dose, repeated every 6 to 8 hours. Treatment usually was begun empirically, without a preceding study to document gastroesophageal reflux. The most frequent indications for cisapride treatment were choking or gagging, with associated apnea, bradycardia, and desaturation. Approximately 50% of patients had discontinued cisapride treatment before discharge. Eighty-four percent of clinicians judged cisapride to be effective for the problems being treated.

CONCLUSIONS

Cisapride treatment of premature infants of <36 weeks' gestation and <3 months of age in NICUs appears to be widespread in the United States. Complications and adverse events were seen when cisapride was administered in excessive dosages or in combination with a drug that inhibits its metabolism and leads to increased serum concentrations. Severe toxicities such as arrhythmias were reported with a frequency of <1/11 000 NICU admissions. However, in a retrospective survey, episodes of toxicity, including mortality, attributable to cisapride may not have been recognized or reported.

Lansoprazole. An update of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of acid-related disorders

Lansoprazole is a proton pump inhibitor that reduces gastric acid secretion. It has proved effective in combination regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and as monotherapy to heal and relieve symptoms of gastric or duodenal ulcers and gastro-oesophageal reflux. After initial healing, it may be used to prevent recurrence of oesophageal erosions or peptic ulcers in patients in whom H. pylori is not the major cause of ulceration and to reduce basal acid output in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Usual dosages are 15 to 60 mg/day, although dosages of < or = 180 mg/day have been used in patients with hypersecretory states. In patients with duodenal or gastric ulcer, short term lansoprazole monotherapy was similar to omeprazole and superior to histamine H2 receptor antagonists in achieving healing rates > 90%. Lansoprazole was as effective a component of H. pylori eradication regimens as omeprazole, tripotassium dicitrato bismuthate (colloidal bismuth subcitrate) or ranitidine. Lansoprazole was superior to ranitidine in symptom relief and healing of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and tended to relieve symptoms more rapidly than omeprazole, although initial healing was similar. As maintenance treatment, lansoprazole was similar to omeprazole and superior to ranitidine in relieving symptoms and preventing relapse. Lansoprazole was also superior to ranitidine in healing and relieving symptoms of oesophageal erosions associated with Barrett's oesophagus; healing was maintained for a mean of 2.9 years in > or = 70% of patients. Lansoprazole was also superior to ranitidine in prophylaxis of redilatation of oesophageal strictures. After > or = 4 years of use in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, lansoprazole 60 to 180 mg/day effectively controlled basal acid output. Dosages may be reduced in some patients once healing and symptom relief has been achieved. Preliminary studies of lansoprazole in patients at risk of aspiration pneumonia or stress ulcers show promise. Although studies show lansoprazole is potentially effective in treating gastrointestinal bleeding, future studies should assess patients' H. pylori status. Lansoprazole has been well tolerated in clinical trials, with headache, diarrhoea, dizziness and nausea appearing to be the most common adverse effects. Tolerability of lansoprazole does not deteriorate with age and the drug is well tolerated in long term use (< or = 4 years) in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or reflux disease. Thus, lansoprazole is an important alternative to omeprazole and H2 receptor antagonists in acid-related disorders. In addition to its efficacy in healing or maintenance treatment, it may provide more effective symptom relief than other comparator agents.