The study of tamoxifen and raloxifene: preliminary enrollment data from a randomized breast cancer risk reduction trial

Hyaluronic acid-coated chitosan nanoparticles as targeted-carrier of tamoxifen against MCF7 and TMX-resistant MCF7 cells

Tamoxifen (TMX) is used to treat hormone-receptor-positive breast cancers at early stages. This research aimed to assess the potential of NPs in targeted delivery of TMX against MCF7 and TMX-resistant MCF7 breast cancer cell lines. For this purpose, a targeted delivery system including chitosan NPs coated with hyaluronic acid (HA-CS NPs) was created and examined in vitro. Chitosan NPs were first fabricated and loaded with TMX using the ionic-gelation method to prepare a drug-delivery system. Then, TMX-loaded CS NPs were coated by crosslinking the amino groups of chitosan to the carboxylic group of hyaluronic acid. The developed TMX delivery system was then optimized and characterized for particle fabrication, drug release, and targeting against cancer cells. The HA-CS particle size was 210 nm and its zeta potential was +25 mv. The encapsulation efficiency of TMX in NPs was 55%. TMX released from the NPs in acidic pH (5-6) was higher than the physiological pH (7.4). The cytotoxic effect of TMX-loaded HA-CS NPs on MCF7 and TMX-resistant MCF7 cells was significantly higher than TMX-loaded CS NPs and free drug. The findings confirmed the significant suppressive impact of TMX-loaded HA-CS NPs on MCF7 and TMX-resistant MCF7 cancer cells compared to the TMX-loaded CS NPs and free TMX. Graphical abstract.

Benzothiophene derivatives as selective estrogen receptor covalent antagonists: Design, synthesis and anti-ERα activities

Estrogen receptor α emerged as a well validated therapeutic target of breast cancer for decades. However, approximately 50% of patients who initially responding to standard-of-care (SoC), such as undergo therapy of Tamoxifen, generally inevitably progress to an endocrine-resistance ER+ phenotype. Recently, selective estrogen receptor covalent antagonists (SERCAs) targeted to ERα have been demonstrated as a therapeutic alternative. In the present study, series of novel 6-OH-benzothiophene (BT) derivatives targeting ERα and deriving from Raloxifene were designed, synthesized, and biologically evaluated as covalent antagonists. Driven by the antiproliferative efficacy in ER+ breast cancer cells, our chemical optimization finally led to compound 19d that with potent antagonistic activity in ER+ tumor cells while without agonistic activity in endometrial cells. Moreover, the docking simulation was carried out to elucidate the binding mode, revealing 19d as an antagonist and covalently binding to the cysteine residue at the 530 position of ER helix H11.

Cancer prevention and screening: the next step in the era of precision medicine

A primary mode of cancer prevention and early detection in the United States is the widespread practice of screening. Although many strategies for early detection and prevention are available, adverse outcomes, such as overdiagnosis and overtreatment, are prevalent among those utilizing these approaches. Broad use of mammography and prostate cancer screening are key examples illustrating the potential harms stemming from the detection of indolent lesions and the subsequent overtreatment. Furthermore, there are several cancers for which prevention strategies do not currently exist. Clinical and experimental evidence have expanded our understanding of cancer initiation and progression, and have instructed the development of improved, precise modes of cancer prevention and early detection. Recent cancer prevention and early detection innovations have begun moving towards the integration of molecular knowledge and risk stratification profiles to allow for a more accurate representation of at-risk individuals. The future of cancer prevention and early detection efforts should emphasize the incorporation of precision cancer prevention integration where screening and cancer prevention regimens can be matched to one's risk of cancer due to known genomic and environmental factors.

Gaining control over breast cancer risk: Transforming vulnerability, uncertainty, and the future through clinical trial participation - a qualitative study

Concepts of disease risk and its management are central to processes of medicalisation and pharmaceuticalisation. Through a narrative perspective, this paper aims to understand how such macro-level developments may (or may not) be experienced individually, and how an algorithm that is used for recruitment into a clinical trial may structure individual notions of being 'at risk' and 'in need of treatment'. We interviewed 31 women participating in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR), a chemoprevention trial conducted in the US between 1999 and 2006. Interviews were thematically analysed. Women in the study had experienced the threat of breast cancer and felt vulnerable to developing the disease prior to STAR participation. The diagnosis of 'being at risk' for cancer through an algorithm that determined risk-eligibility for STAR, opened up the possibility for the women to heal. The trial became a means to recognise and collectivise the women's experiences of vulnerability. Through medication intake, being cared for by study coordinators, and the sense of community with other STAR participants, trial participation worked to transform women's lives. Such transformative experiences may nevertheless have been temporary, enduring only as long as the close links to the medical institution through trial participation lasted.

My Lived Experiences Are More Important Than Your Probabilities: The Role of Individualized Risk Estimates for Decision Making about Participation in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR)

BACKGROUND

Decision-making experts emphasize that understanding and using probabilistic information are important for making informed decisions about medical treatments involving complex risk-benefit tradeoffs. Yet empirical research demonstrates that individuals may not use probabilities when making decisions.

OBJECTIVES

To explore decision making and the use of probabilities for decision making from the perspective of women who were risk-eligible to enroll in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR).

METHODS

We conducted narrative interviews with 20 women who agreed to participate in STAR and 20 women who declined. The project was based on a narrative approach. Analysis included the development of summaries of each narrative, and thematic analysis with developing a coding scheme inductively to code all transcripts to identify emerging themes.

RESULTS

Interviewees explained and embedded their STAR decisions within experiences encountered throughout their lives. Such lived experiences included but were not limited to breast cancer family history, a personal history of breast biopsies, and experiences or assumptions about taking tamoxifen or medicines more generally.

CONCLUSIONS

Women's explanations of their decisions about participating in a breast cancer chemoprevention trial were more complex than decision strategies that rely solely on a quantitative risk-benefit analysis of probabilities derived from populations In addition to precise risk information, clinicians and risk communicators should recognize the importance and legitimacy of lived experience in individual decision making.

When is excision necessary for atypical lobular hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ?

SUMMARY This management perspective briefly covers the histology and molecular features of lobular in situ neoplasia and provides an in-depth discussion of the need for surgical excision if lobular in situ neoplasia is diagnosed on core-needle biopsy. The management of lobular in situ neoplasia found on core-needle biopsy has been an area of recent study with varying results. Emerging data suggest that low-risk patients with a limited extent of isolated classic lobular in situ neoplasia found on core-needle biopsy may not require subsequent surgical excision. However, high-risk patients, those with extensive lobular in situ neoplasia, or other high-risk lesions noted on core-needle biopsy likely benefit from surgical excision. Most authors recommend surgical excision when pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ is found on core-needle biopsy due to its higher association with invasive carcinoma. However, the natural history of this more recently described variant of lobular carcinoma in situ is not fully defined, and the clinical management of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ on excisional biopsy is yet to be determined.

Association of cellular and molecular responses in the rat mammary gland to 17β-estradiol with susceptibility to mammary cancer

BACKGROUND

We are using ACI and BN rats, which differ markedly in their susceptibility to 17β-estradiol (E2)-induced mammary cancer, to identify genetic variants and environmental factors that determine mammary cancer susceptibility. The objective of this study was to characterize the cellular and molecular responses to E2 in the mammary glands of ACI and BN rats to identify qualitative and quantitative phenotypes that associate with and/or may confer differences in susceptibility to mammary cancer.

METHODS

Female ACI and BN rats were treated with E2 for 1, 3 or 12 weeks. Mammary gland morphology and histology were examined by whole mount and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Cell proliferation and epithelial density were evaluated by quantitative immunohistochemistry. Apoptosis was evaluated by quantitative western blotting and flow cytometry. Mammary gland differentiation was examined by immunohistochemistry. Gene expression was evaluated by microarray, qRT-PCR and quantitative western blotting assays. Extracellular matrix (ECM) associated collagen was evaluated by Picrosirius Red staining and Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) microscopy.

RESULTS

The luminal epithelium of ACI rats exhibited a rapid and sustained proliferative response to E2. By contrast, the proliferative response exhibited by the mammary epithelium of BN rats was restrained and transitory. Moreover, the epithelium of BN rats appeared to undergo differentiation in response to E2, as evidenced by production of milk proteins as well as luminal ectasia and associated changes in the ECM. Marked differences in expression of genes that encode proteins with well-defined roles in mammary gland development (Pgr, Wnt4, Tnfsf11, Prlr, Stat5a, Areg, Gata3), differentiation and milk production (Lcn2, Spp1), regulation of extracellular environment (Mmp7, Mmp9), and cell-cell or cell-ECM interactions (Cd44, Cd24, Cd52) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose that these cellular and molecular phenotypes are heritable and may underlie, at least in part, the differences in mammary cancer susceptibility exhibited by ACI and BN rats.

The role of estrogen in the treatment of men with schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a debilitating and pervasive mental illness with devastating effects on many aspects of psychological, cognitive and social wellbeing. Epidemiological and life-cycle data point to significant differences in the incidence and course of schizophrenia between men and women, suggesting that estrogen plays a "protective" role . Adjunctive estrogen therapy has been shown to be effective in enhancing the treatment of schizophrenia in women. In men, consideration of estrogen therapy has been impacted by concerns of feminisation, however, clinical trials using estrogen to treat prostate cancer, bone density loss and even aggression in men with dementia or traumatic brain injury, show estrogen to be a safe and effective therapy. Findings do, however, suggest that further exploration of a therapeutic role for adjunctive estradiol treatment in men with schizophrenia is warranted. The development of the new estrogen compounds - Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs) which do not cause feminisation - opens up the possibility of using a different type of estrogen for a longer period of time at higher doses. Estrogen could therefore prove to be an important component in the treatment of psychotic symptoms in men with schizophrenia. This review explains the scientific rationale behind the estrogen hypothesis and how it can be clinically utilised to address concerns unique to the care of men with schizophrenia.

Raloxifene: a selective estrogen-receptor modulator for postmenopausal osteoporosis - a clinical update on efficacy and safety

Selective estrogen-receptor modulators are molecules with specific estrogen-receptor binding affinity. Each selective estrogen-receptor modulator induces a unique conformation in the ligand-receptor complex, which leads to transcriptional activation and/or inhibition. Raloxifene 60 mg/day, a benzothiophene selective estrogen-receptor modulator, is approved for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. This article provides an update on new studies and further analyses of clinical trial data for raloxifene. The Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial of women with osteoporosis has described the efficacy of raloxifene in decreasing vertebral fracture risk over 4 years. The Continuing Outcomes Relevant to Evista((R)) (CORE) trial, designed to assess the effects of raloxifene on breast cancer prevention, is a 4-year continuation of MORE. The skeletal and cardiovascular effects of raloxifene in the CORE study were similar to those observed in MORE. The relative risk of developing breast cancer was significantly decreased in women treated with raloxifene, compared with placebo, after 4 years in MORE and 8 years in the CORE trial. The incidence of uterine bleeding, endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer was similar between raloxifene and placebo after 8 years of treatment. Raloxifene use is associated with a higher incidence of hot flashes and leg cramps, and an increased risk of venous thromboembolic events.

Breast cancer prevention trials: large and small trials

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the United States, with 192,870 new cases and 40,170 deaths due to this disease estimated to have occurred 2009. An emphasis on prevention has been increasing in view of a persisting high incidence of disease. Seventy percent of breast cancers are estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, and are therefore presumed to be hormone-responsive and potentially treatable or preventable by anti-estrogenic agents. To date, the large, phase III randomized controlled breast cancer prevention trials have tested and are testing only hormonal drugs designed to antagonize the carcinogenic effect of endogenous estrogen; these agents are either selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) or aromatase inhibitors (AIs). The SERMs, tamoxifen and raloxifene, have been shown in these large trials to reduce the risk of ER-positive breast cancers; prevention trials of AIs are ongoing. Interest is now focusing on developing agents with a broader spectrum of preventive activity, particularly with regard to ER-negative subtypes of breast cancer. A number of phase I and II trials using tissue-derived surrogate endpoint biomarkers (SEBs) as outcomes have been implemented. These smaller trials address prevention not only of ER-negative but also ER-positive breast cancers, since approximately 50% of the latter have been shown to be resistant to the estrogen-targeting drugs used in the large trials. Issues of importance in these smaller trials include choice of agent, selection of appropriate trial participants, trial design, method of access to breast tissue in women without cancer, selection and monitoring of SEBs, and monitoring of drug toxicity.

Latino recruitment to cancer prevention/screening trials in the Southwest: setting a research agenda

Examples of cancer prevention and screening trials in the Southwest are reviewed as a platform for highlighting gaps in research on Latino recruitment. Three trials are described, using "message/source/channel" categories as a framework. Each trial engaged community members to facilitate recruitment and developed tailored strategies to meet challenges emerging after recruitment began. Although we affirm that culturally relevant messages, community member referral networks, and adjustment to community realities seem important to Latino recruitment, current anecdotal and research findings do not allow evidence-based recommendations to be made. We suggest a research agenda to further illuminate critical factors for successful Latino recruitment.

The selective oestrogen receptor modulator, LY362321, is not neuroprotective in a rat model of transient focal ischaemia

Selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) may offer improved alternatives to oestrogen as neuroprotectants in experimental stroke. The present study investigated the role of a novel SERM, LY362321, in a rat model of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). Female Sprague-Dawley rats were ovariectomised and began receiving daily s.c. injections of either 1 mg/kg (n = 13), 10 mg/kg (n = 14) of LY362321, or vehicle (n = 13). The left MCA was temporarily occluded (90 min), with cortical blood flow monitoring, at 12 days post ovariectomy. Sensorimotor function was assessed using a neurological score prior to the MCAO and daily for 3 days following the MCAO. Tissue was processed for infarct volume assessment using 2,3,5-triphenyltetra-zolium chloride staining. The results indicated that there were no significant differences amongst groups in cortical blood flow during the MCAO. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in infarct size amongst vehicle, 1, and 10 mg/kg treated animals: 22.9 +/- 5.0, 16.7 +/- 4.2, and 21.1 +/- 4.1, respectively, one-way anova [F(2,32) = 0.542, P = 0.587]. The MCAO induced a significant decline in neurological score in the vehicle group (from 14 to 7 at 24 h post-MCAO) but this was not significantly affected by LY362321 at either dose. In conclusion, pretreatment with a low or high dose of the novel SERM LY362321 did not significantly influence cerebral blood flow, infarct volume, or sensorimotor function in rats exposed to transient MCAO.

Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Risk Reduction

Until recently, the primary message of breast health awareness programs was that early detection is a woman's best protection against breast cancer, because there was no way to prevent it. Currently, however, tamoxifen is approved for chemoprevention of breast cancer in high-risk women, and studies are underway evaluating other medications that may decrease breast cancer risk. Data have also become available regarding the efficacy of surgical strategies to reduce breast cancer risk. Any prevention method, however, will have associated risk of complications or adverse effects, and determining the net risk/benefit ratio depends on the ability to accurately quantify a woman's baseline likelihood of developing breast cancer. This article reviews available methods for assessing and reducing breast cancer risk.

A favorable view: progress in cancer prevention and screening

Clifton Leaf, in his article "Why We're Losing the War on Cancer," presents criticisms of past research approaches and the small impact of this research thus far on producing cures or substantially extending the life of many cancer patients. It is true that gains in long-term survival for people with advanced cancers have been modest, hindered in part by the heterogeneity of tumors, which allows the cancers to persist using alternate molecular pathways and so evade many cancer therapeutics. In contrast, clinical trials have demonstrated that it is possible to reduce the incidence or improve cancer survival through prevention and early detection. Strides have been made in preventing or detecting early the four deadliest cancers in the United States (i.e., lung, breast, prostate, and colorectal). For example, 7-year follow-up data from the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT) provides evidence that tamoxifen reduces the occurrence of invasive breast tumors by more than 40%; recent studies using aromatase inhibitors and raloxifene are also promising. The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) showed that finasteride reduced prostate cancer incidence by 25%, and the ongoing Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT) is investigating selenium and vitamin E for prostate cancer prevention based on encouraging results from earlier studies. Living a healthy lifestyle, including regular physical activity, avoiding obesity, and eating primarily a plant-based diet has been associated with a lower risk of colorectal cancer. In addition, noninvasive stool DNA tests for early detection are being studied, which may lessen the reluctance of people to be screened for colorectal polyps and cancer. Behavioral and medical approaches for smoking prevention are ways to reduce the incidence of lung cancer, with antinicotine vaccines on the horizon that may help former smokers to avoid relapse. The US National Lung Screening Trial is testing whether early detection via spiral CT screening will reduce lung cancer mortality. Prevention and earlier detection offer efficient and practical strategies to reduce the cancer burden. Several of the suggestions Mr. Leaf makes, such as developing interdisciplinary collaborations and allocating resources to research earlier in the process of carcinogenesis, have become an integral strategy in the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) approach in the past decade, specifically in the realm of cancer prevention and early detection. For example, an aggressive program to identify biomarkers for earlier detection of cancer--the NCI's Early Detection Research Detection (EDRN)--has identified three promising biomarkers since its establishment in 2000. It collaborates with the National Institute of Standards and Technology and extramural scientists to develop validation standards and to identify the best technologies to use for systematic investigations. If these biomarkers can be validated, they might help to reduce cancer mortality.

Biological activities of a novel selective oestrogen receptor modulator derived from raloxifene (Y134)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Selective oestrogen receptor (ER) modulators (SERMs) are of great value in the treatment of breast cancer and osteoporosis. The aim of this study was to characterize pharmacologically a new class of SERMs synthesized based on the core structure of raloxifene.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Competitive receptor binding and luciferase-based reporter methods were used to study the bioactivities of raloxifene analogues, followed by efficacy determination in breast cancer cell proliferation assay. ER antagonist effects were investigated in female rats by measuring uterine and mammary gland growth, using wet weight, BrdU incorporation and terminal end bud (TEB) as indicators.

KEY RESULTS

Five analogues, belonging to two different structural series and display higher binding affinities for ERalpha than ERbeta were functionally evaluated. One such analogue, Y134, exhibited potent antagonist activity at ERs in CV-1 cells cotransfected with plasmids containing ERalpha or ERbeta and oestrogen-response element-driven luciferase. The estimated IC(50) value was 0.52 nM for ERalpha and 2.94 nM for ERbeta, comparable to that of raloxifene. Little cytotoxicity was observed at Y134 concentrations below 10 microM. Y134 suppressed oestrogen-stimulated proliferation of ER-positive human breast cancer MCF-7 and T47D cells. At an identical dose, administered to ovariectomized rats, Y134 was more effective than raloxifene at arresting oestrogen-induced outgrowth of TEB and mammary gland DNA synthesis, but their inhibitory effects on the uterus were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Y134 is a potent ER antagonist with better mammary gland selectivity than raloxifene and shows potential for development as a new SERM for therapeutic use.

Antiestrogens and the formation of DNA damage in rats: a comparison

Tamoxifen (TAM) has been used as an agent for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer. However, long-term treatment of TAM in women increases the risk of developing endometrial cancer. The secondary cancer may be due to the genotoxicity of TAM. To find safer alternatives, four selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHTAM), toremifene (TOR), raloxifene (RAL), and ICI 182,780, were administered to rats with an equimolar dose of TAM [54 micromol/kg (20 mg/kg)/day, p.o. for 7 days]. To evaluate the genotoxicity of each SERM, the presence of bulky DNA adducts was determined by (32)P-postlabeling/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and (32)P-postlabeling/high-performance liquid chromatography. The formation of 7,8-dihydro-8-oxodeoxyguanosine (8-oxodG) was analyzed as a marker of typical oxidative damage, using liquid chromatography electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Among the SERMs, bulky DNA adducts were detected in the livers of rats treated with TAM; the total amount of TAM-DNA adducts was 26.1 adducts/10(7) nucleotides. However, with a detection limit of approximately 2 adducts/10(9) nucleotides, no bulky DNA adducts were observed with 4-OHTAM, TOR, RAL, or ICI 182,780. In addition, no significant increase of hepatic 8-oxodG lesions was detected in rats treated with any of the antiestrogens. Therefore, TOR, RAL, and ICI 182,780 are likely to be less genotoxic than TAM.

Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography

BACKGROUND

Risk prediction models for breast cancer can be improved by the addition of recently identified risk factors, including breast density and use of hormone therapy. We used prospective risk information to predict a diagnosis of breast cancer in a cohort of 1 million women undergoing screening mammography.

METHODS

There were 2,392,998 eligible screening mammograms from women without previously diagnosed breast cancer who had had a prior mammogram in the preceding 5 years. Within 1 year of the screening mammogram, 11,638 women were diagnosed with breast cancer. Separate logistic regression risk models were constructed for premenopausal and postmenopausal examinations by use of a stringent (P<.0001) criterion for the inclusion of risk factors. Risk models were constructed with 75% of the data and validated with the remaining 25%. Concordance of the predicted with the observed outcomes was assessed by a concordance (c) statistic after logistic regression model fit. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Statistically significant risk factors for breast cancer diagnosis among premenopausal women included age, breast density, family history of breast cancer, and a prior breast procedure. For postmenopausal women, the statistically significant factors included age, breast density, race, ethnicity, family history of breast cancer, a prior breast procedure, body mass index, natural menopause, hormone therapy, and a prior false-positive mammogram. The model may identify high-risk women better than the Gail model, although predictive accuracy was only moderate. The c statistics were 0.631 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.618 to 0.644) for premenopausal women and 0.624 (95% CI = 0.619 to 0.630) for postmenopausal women.

CONCLUSION

Breast density is a strong additional risk factor for breast cancer, although it is unknown whether reduction in breast density would reduce risk. Our risk model may be able to identify women at high risk for breast cancer for preventive interventions or more intensive surveillance.

Defining "success" in recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: moving toward a more consistent approach

Although medically underserved groups bear a heavy burden of cancer disease and governmental agencies have required inclusion of minorities and women in cancer clinical trials since 1993, many of these groups are underrepresented in cancer prevention or treatment clinical trials. To assess and enhance recruitment of underrepresented populations into cancer-related clinical trials, investigators and governmental agencies need consistent measurement approaches for recruitment that can be applied to diverse settings where trials are conducted. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate what measurement approaches were used to evaluate the success of recruitment of underrepresented groups into cancer prevention or treatment trials, and whether these recruitment goals were stated a priori. Only two articles reported an a priori recruitment goal. The recruitment measurement approaches varied considerably, with no consistent standard, especially for individual trials. By using the empiric evidence from this review in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines, we constructed a framework for choosing consistent a priori recruitment goals for underrepresented groups based on the research question and study location. Using consistent measurement approaches for underrepresented groups will improve comparability of recruitment strategies across trials, improve equity in distribution of benefits and burdens of cancer-related clinical trials, and may improve applicability of trial results to multiple populations.

Cancer prevention trials and primary care physicians: Factors associated with recommending trial enrollment

BACKGROUND

To explore the willingness of primary care providers (PCPs) to encourage enrollment of patients into cancer prevention trials.

METHODS

A self-administered survey was mailed to a random sample of PCPs in three geographic regions. Physicians were asked questions about their knowledge and attitudes towards cancer prevention trials. We presented a clinical vignette of a woman at high risk for breast cancer and asked if they would encourage her enrollment into a breast cancer chemoprevention trial (yes/no). Each survey included one of 16 possible clinical vignettes where patient characteristics (age, race socioeconomic status, physical mobility and co-morbidity) varied dichotomously. Bivariate analyses and logistic models were used to examine the independent effects of patient and physician characteristics on physician decisions.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-six surveys (50% response) were analyzed. The mean age of respondents was 48; 54% were White, 35% Asian and 5% Black. By design physicians were evenly distributed by gender, specialty and geographic location. Overall, 53% would encourage enrollment into a breast cancer chemoprevention trial. Significant predictors of a recommendation to enroll were: geographic location in California or Georgia, younger vignette patient and anticipating an increase in patient trust after recommending enrollment.

CONCLUSION

PCPs are less likely to encourage elderly patients to enroll into cancer chemoprevention trials. Decisions differ based on geographic location and perceived trust in the patient-provider relationship. To achieve successful enrollment, trial investigators must continue to educate PCPs and ensure a strong PCP-patient relationship is maintained.

Effects of raloxifene on normal breast tissue from premenopausal women

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of raloxifene on normal breast tissue. A randomized, double-blind study was carried out in 30 ovulatory, premenopausal women of 18-40 years of age, who had been diagnosed with fibroadenoma of the breast. The patients were divided into two groups: Group A (placebo, n = 16) and Group B (raloxifene 60 mg, n = 14). The medication was given for 22 days, beginning on the first day of the menstrual cycle. An excisional biopsy was carried out on the 23rd day during which a sample of normal breast tissue was collected to evaluate the presence of the proliferating cell marker Ki-67. Student's t-test was used for the statistical analysis of data (p < 0.05). Mean percentage of stained nuclei in groups A and B was 10.96 +/- 1.27 and 1.21 +/- 0.26, respectively (p < 0.001). Raloxifene significantly reduced the proliferative activity of normal breast tissue in premenopausal women.

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs): mechanisms of anticarcinogenesis and drug resistance

Despite the beneficial effects of estrogens in women's health, there is a plethora of evidence that suggest an important role for these hormones, particularly 17beta-estradiol (E(2)), in the development and progression of breast cancer. Most estrogenic responses are mediated by estrogen receptors (ERs), either ERalpha or ERbeta, which are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-dependent transcription factors. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are ER ligands that in some tissues (i.e. bone and cardiovascular system) act like estrogens but block estrogen action in others. Tamoxifen is the first SERM that has been successfully tested for the prevention of breast cancer in high-risk women and is currently approved for the endocrine treatment of all stages of ER-positive breast cancer. Raloxifene, a newer SERM originally developed for osteoporosis, also appears to have preventive effect on breast cancer incidence. Numerous studies have examined the molecular mechanisms for the tissue selective action of SERMs, and collectively they indicate that different ER ligands induce distinct conformational changes in the receptor that influence its ability to interact with coregulatory proteins (i.e. coactivators and corepressors) critical for the regulation of target gene transcription. The relative expression of coactivators and corepressors, and the nature of the ER and its target gene promoter also affect SERM biocharacter. This review summarizes the therapeutic application of SERMs in medicine; particularly breast cancer, and highlights the emerging understanding of the mechanism of action of SERMs in select target tissues, and the inevitable development of resistance.

Available medical choices for the management of menopause

The age at which menopause occurs is a critical factor in the magnitude of its consequences. Most of the medium-to-long-term effects of oestrogen deprivation depend on their duration. The timing of the last menstruation is therefore important, but hypoestrogenic amenorrhoea during the reproductive age is also a relevant factor in the evaluation of individual risks. In recent years, moving post-menopausal women from the lowest point of ovarian hypofunction has been the most important motivation for developing guidelines for the hormonal management of menopause. However, recent data suggest that this may be associated with an unacceptable increase in morbidity in a number of women. Concerns about long-term hormone replacement therapy (HRT) at menopause have recently enhanced interest in a group of molecules that act on the oestrogen receptor with selective effects, known as selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). Of these, Raloxifene has been approved for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis, and exhibits a pattern of actions particularly well matched to the needs and concerns of post-menopausal women. Further studies on SERMs may open up new vistas in patient-specific management of post-menopausal health. Finally, debates on the specific health consequences of menopause deal mainly with the risk of chronic disease. Gynaecologists and other health professionals would be advised to develop intervention strategies at menopause according to the continuum of a woman's life, beginning at the post-menarche and extending into later life.

Prophylaxis approach to a-symptomatic post-menopausal women: Breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common cancer of women worldwide. Its frequency increases throughout the female lifespan. Epidemiological research has clearly identified important reproductive risk factors for breast cancer, including age at menarche, age at menopause, age at first-term pregnancy and nulliparity, which provide important clues to the hormonal origin of this disease. The widespread use of exogenous sex steroids as contraceptive agents and as hormonal replacement therapy has been a source of concern and generates discussion about their effects on breast health. Lifestyle changes, exercise or diet could play a role in primary prevention of breast cancer. Regular exercise, ingestion of adequate amounts of fruit and vegetables, limiting alcohol consumption, avoidance of obesity in post-menopausal women, and perhaps the use of olive oil, may all have a protective effect and should be considered by women. There is insufficient scientific evidence of the role played by phyto-oestrogens on breast cancer risk. Other preventive measures that include the use of drugs such as statins or aspirin should not be recommended until we have more information about their effects on the breast. Especially for high-risk women, all the aforementioned measures may be not enough, and chemo-prevention should be considered. The use of selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) to reduce breast cancer risk is still being evaluated. Tamoxifen was the first SERM approved for the reduction of breast cancer incidence in women at high risk. However its use has limitations, due to significant side effects. Raloxifene has been approved for the prevention and treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis and has provided excellent indications of breast cancer risk reduction, with a more favourable profile than tamoxifen.

Factors affecting participation in a breast cancer risk reduction telephone survey among women from four racial/ethnic groups

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the participation of minorities in health behavior research. This manuscript assesses factors associated with participation among women in four racial/ethnic groups.

METHODS

A total of 2800 Asian/Pacific Islander (API), Black, Latina, and non-Latina White women recruited through the San Francisco Mammography Registry was invited in 2002 and 2003 to participate in a telephone survey about breast cancer prevention.

RESULTS

Minorities participated at lower rates (49% for APIs, 60% for Latinas, and 64% for Blacks) than Whites (77%). Increased participation was associated with younger age for Latinas (OR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.05-3.44) and Whites (OR = 1.77, CI 1.08-2.91), and with a family history of breast cancer for APIs (OR = 2.09, CI 1.24-3.52). Decreased participation was associated with having less than a high school education for APIs (OR = 0.47, CI 0.26-0.86), Blacks (OR = 0.29, CI 0.11-0.78), and Latinas (OR = 0.51, CI 0.28-0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest minorities' participation in health behavior research does not match Whites' and should be enhanced.

Estrogens and their receptors in breast cancer progression: a dual role in cancer proliferation and invasion

Estrogens play an important role in regulating the growth and differentiation of normal, premalignant and malignant cell types, especially breast epithelial cells, through interaction with two nuclear estrogen receptors (ERalpha and ERbeta). In this review, we present a brief overview of the actions of estrogens in the different steps of breast carcinogenesis, including cancer progression to metastasis, and of their clinical consequences in the prevention, prognosis and treatment of the disease. The requirement of estrogen receptors, mainly of the alpha subtype, in normal mammary gland differentiation and growth has been evidenced by estrogen receptor deficiency in animals. The promotion of breast cancer carcinogenesis by prolonged exposure to estrogens is well-documented and this has logically led to the use of anti-estrogens as potentially chemopreventive agents. In breast cancer progression, however, the exact roles of estrogen receptors have been less well established but they may possibly be dual. Estrogens are mitogenic in ER-positive cells and anti-estrogens are an efficient adjuvant therapy for these tumors. On the other hand, the fact that estrogens and their receptors protect against cancer cell invasiveness through distinct mechanisms in experimental models may explain why the presence of ER is associated with well-differentiated and less invasive tumors.

Benefit-Risk Assessment of Raloxifene in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Raloxifene, a nonsteroidal benzothiophene, is a second-generation selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) that is an antiresorptive agent. Raloxifene is a non-hormonal agent that binds to the estrogen receptor and results in estrogen agonist effects on bone and the cardiovascular system and estrogen antagonist effects on endometrial and breast tissue. Raloxifene has diverse pharmacodynamic properties due to its differential interactions with the estrogen receptor and tissue selectivity. Raloxifene was the first SERM to be approved for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. In this review, we conducted a systematic search of the literature for trials that evaluated the following outcomes: bone density, fractures, quality of life, cardiovascular outcomes, safety and adverse events. Raloxifene at the approved dosage of 60 mg/day increased lumbar spine bone density by 2.5% relative to control after 2 years of therapy. A large fracture prevention trial confirmed that treatment with raloxifene 60 mg/day for 3 years decreased the relative risk of incident vertebral fractures by 30-50% in women with prevalent fractures or osteoporosis. Extraskeletal effects of raloxifene include a reduction in total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Assessment of the safety profile revealed that raloxifene was not associated with endometrial hyperplasia and that there was a 72% reduction in the incidence of invasive breast cancer in raloxifene-treated postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Adverse events associated with raloxifene included an increase in the absolute risk of venous thromboembolism and an increase in the risk of hot flashes and leg cramps. In comparison to other osteoporosis therapies, raloxifene has a lesser impact on bone mineral density, a similar effect on the occurrence of vertebral fractures, but no effect on the frequency of non-vertebral fractures. Raloxifene can be recommended for the prevention of vertebral fractures in women with osteopenia/osteoporosis who are not at high risk of non-vertebral fractures and who do not have a past history of venous thromboembolism.

Breast carcinoma chemoprevention in the community setting

BACKGROUND

The United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends that women who are at both high risk for breast carcinoma and low risk for adverse events should receive counseling regarding tamoxifen for chemoprevention. Estimates of the risks and benefits of tamoxifen based on results from clinical trials may not reflect the real-world experience. The authors determined the prevalence of women in a community-based cohort who would meet the definition of high risk for breast carcinoma and calculated the number of women needed to screen to determine one for whom the benefits of tamoxifen would outweigh the risks. Baseline incidence also was examined for adverse health events in this community-based cohort compared with participants in the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial.

METHODS

The study participants were women ages 40-70 years (n = 6048 women) who were members of the CLUE II cohort, which started in 1989, and who responded to questionnaire surveys in 1996 and 2000.

RESULTS

Eighteen percent of all women had a 5-year risk of invasive breast carcinoma > or = 1.66%. The number of women needed to screen to find 1 woman for whom the benefits outweighed the risks of tamoxifen ranged from 26 women ages 40-49 years to 142 women ages 60-70 years. For women who had undergone a hysterectomy, the numbers needed to screen were lower. Baseline incidence rates of fracture and thromboembolic disease were higher in the community-based cohort compared with the rates observed among prevention trial participants; thus, fewer women had to be treated with tamoxifen to prevent one fracture. However, fewer women in the community also had to be treated to observe harm with a thromboembolic event.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians who counsel women about tamoxifen should take into consideration community-level risks and benefits.

Continuing outcomes relevant to Evista: breast cancer incidence in postmenopausal osteoporotic women in a randomized trial of raloxifene

BACKGROUND

The randomized, double-blind Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial found that 4 years of raloxifene therapy decreased the incidence of invasive breast cancer among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis by 72% compared with placebo. We conducted the Continuing Outcomes Relevant to Evista (CORE) trial to examine the effect of 4 additional years of raloxifene therapy on the incidence of invasive breast cancer in women in MORE who agreed to continue in CORE.

METHODS

Women who had been randomly assigned to receive raloxifene (either 60 or 120 mg/day) in MORE were assigned to receive raloxifene (60 mg/day) in CORE (n = 3510), and women who had been assigned to receive placebo in MORE continued on placebo in CORE (n = 1703). Breast cancer incidence was analyzed by a log-rank test, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to compute hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

During the CORE trial, the 4-year incidences of invasive breast cancer and estrogen receptor (ER)-positive invasive breast cancer were reduced by 59% (HR = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.24 to 0.71) and 66% (HR = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.66), respectively, in the raloxifene group compared with the placebo group. There was no difference between the two groups in incidence of ER-negative invasive breast cancer during CORE (P = .86). Over the 8 years of both trials, the incidences of invasive breast cancer and ER-positive invasive breast cancer were reduced by 66% (HR = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.50) and 76% (HR = 0.24; 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.40), respectively, in the raloxifene group compared with the placebo group. During the CORE trial, the relative risk of thromboembolism in the raloxifene group compared with that in the placebo group was 2.17 (95% CI = 0.83 to 5.70). This increased risk, also observed in the MORE trial, persisted over the 8 years of both trials.

CONCLUSIONS

The reduction in invasive breast cancer incidence continues beyond 4 years of raloxifene treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. No new safety concerns related to raloxifene therapy were identified during CORE.

Clinical trials in cancer prevention: current results and perspectives for the future

Cancer prevention remains the ideal strategy for reducing the burden of cancer on society. Progress in cancer prevention has been accelerated as prevention clinical trials are completed and reported. A promising strategy is the identification of cancer risk factors through epidemiologic and experimental research with lifestyle and medical approaches that allow translation of clinical trial results to clinical practice. A major focus of cancer prevention clinical trials has been on modulation of hormones and nutritional modifications using natural or synthetic bioactive food components for breast and prostate cancer. Breast cancer prevention clinical trials have investigated the role of estrogen antagonists with agents such as tamoxifen, raloxifene, and newer agents such as aromatase inhibitors and bioactive food components. Among the promising bioactive food components being investigated at the National Cancer Institute in prevention clinical trials to reduce breast cancer risk are indole-3-carbinol, sulforaphanes, phytoestrogen isoflavones, perillyl alcohol, and green tea polyphenols. Prostate cancer prevention trials have focused on hormone modulation with the 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor finasteride and bioactive food components such as selenium and vitamin E. Soy isoflavones, green tea polyphenols, and doxercalciferol also are being investigated for prostate cancer prevention. Future prevention clinical trials will rely on multidisciplinary medical approaches that bring together expertise in many fields to address disease across the cancer spectrum. Nutritional science can play an important role in this effort through the use of new and emerging technologies to better understand the influence of bioactive food components on the genes, proteins, and cellular processes that are associated with cancer risk.

Ductal Lavage and Risk Assessment of Breast Cancer

Following recent advances in breast cancer chemoprevention, much emphasis has been placed on risk assessment to evaluate whether women at increased risk for developing breast cancer should proceed with breast cancer risk reduction strategies. The currently available risk-reduction approaches include screening, chemoprevention, and preventive surgeries. Breast cancer arises from the epithelial linings of the ductal system, and it is believed that hyperplasia and atypical hyperplasia represent early changes in the breast carcinogenesis process. The ductal lavage procedure offers a minimally invasive method to obtain breast epithelial cells from the ductal system for cytopathologic analysis to provide individualized risk assessment. This paper reviews breast cancer risk factors, with an emphasis on cytological atypia and the role of ductal lavage in breast cancer risk assessment.

Risk-benefit profile for raloxifene: 4-year data From the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) randomized trial

Posthoc analysis of the MORE osteoporosis treatment trial assessed risk-benefit profile of raloxifene in 7705 postmenopausal women. A major disease outcomes global index resulted in annual rates of 1.39% and 1.83% in the raloxifene and placebo groups, respectively (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.92), compatible with a favorable risk-benefit profile for raloxifene for treating postmenopausal osteoporosis.

INTRODUCTION

The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial reported overall risks that exceeded benefits from use of estrogen-progestin in healthy postmenopausal women. The objective of this posthoc analysis of the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial was to assess the safety profile of raloxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator indicated for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, using the global index method from the WHI trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 7705 postmenopausal women (mean age, 67 years) were enrolled in the MORE osteoporosis treatment trial and randomly assigned to receive placebo or one of two doses of raloxifene (60 or 120 mg/day) for 4 years. A global index of clinical outcomes, defined as described for the WHI trial (the earliest occurrence of coronary heart disease, stroke, pulmonary embolism, invasive breast cancer, endometrial cancer, colorectal cancer, hip fracture, or death because of other causes) was applied to the MORE trial data. Physicians blinded to treatment assignment adjudicated events. Intention-to-treat survival analysis of time-to-first-event was performed using a proportional hazards model.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The annualized rate of global index events was 1.83% in the placebo group and 1.39% in the combined raloxifene dose groups (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.92). Analyzing individual dose groups separately yielded the same results (HR for 60 mg/day, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.96: HR for 120 mg/day, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.95). Subgroup analyses showed no significant interactions between age or hysterectomy status and the effect of raloxifene on the global index (interaction p > 0.1), whereas the global index risk reduction seemed to be greater in obese women compared with nonobese women (interaction p = 0.03). The significant 25% reduction in global index is compatible with a favorable risk-benefit safety profile when raloxifene is used for osteoporosis treatment in postmenopausal women. These results require confirmation in ongoing clinical trials.

The Role of Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators in the Prevention of Breast Cancer: Comparison of the Clinical Trials

The role of estrogen in the development of breast cancer is well recognized, and the use of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) to reduce breast cancer risk continues to be evaluated. Tamoxifen is the only SERM approved for the reduction of breast cancer incidence in women at high risk. This approval was based on results from the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial. Although initial results from the Royal Marsden Hospital tamoxifen trial and Italian Tamoxifen Prevention Study did not show a similar overall effect of tamoxifen, recent updates from these two trials and initial results from the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study are consistent with a risk reduction effect of tamoxifen for estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer. Raloxifene, approved for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, is another SERM being evaluated for breast cancer risk reduction. The recently completed Continuing Outcomes Relevant to Evista trial and the Raloxifene Use for The Heart trial, have breast cancer risk reduction as a primary end point. A third, ongoing trial, the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene trial, is evaluating the relative efficacy and adverse event profile of these two agents in a population at high risk. The study populations of these raloxifene breast cancer prevention trials and the four tamoxifen prevention trials are quite diverse in terms of breast cancer risk. Completion of these trials will provide important information about the occurrence of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women and the efficacy of raloxifene for breast cancer risk reduction.

Chemoprevention for pancreatic cancer

For a number of solid tumors, including pancreatic cancer, efforts aimed at disease prevention may be more successful than currently available anticancer treatments. While specific interventions are emerging to prevent breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal cancer, no trials of chemoprevention are being conducted in pancreatic cancer. Importantly, there are significant obstacles to the conduct of such research. However, preclinical and epidemiologic studies suggest that several drugs may have chemopreventive potential in pancreatic cancer. These include aspirin and other non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), selective cyclooxygenase inhibitors, somatostatin analogs, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), and anti-androgenic agents. As the oncology community evaluates some of these agents in large chemoprevention trials for breast, colon, and prostate cancer, it may be found that pancreatic cancer prevention occurs as an unintended, but desirable consequence. Moreover, other general societal trends, such as smoking cessation and the widespread use of cholesterol-lowering agents and aspirin, could have a role in reducing the risk of pancreatic cancer, and in the future, may lead to a decrease in its incidence.

Endocrine prevention of breast cancer using selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SORMs)

Breast cancer remains the most common malignancy in women worldwide. Oestrogen levels appear to be associated with an increased risk for the development of breast cancer. The Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Cooperative Group reported in a 1998 meta-analysis of 37000 breast cancer patients in 55 randomized adjuvant trials that tamoxifen, a selective oestrogen receptor modulator, reduced the incidence of contralateral breast cancers by 47% at 5 years. Tamoxifen has been shown in numerous prevention studies to decrease the incidence of breast cancer in high-risk women. Overall, the tamoxifen prevention trials showed a 38% reduction in the incidence of breast cancer (95% CI 28-46; P<0.0001). In the largest risk-reduction trial, the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial conducted by the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, tamoxifen reduced the risk of invasive breast cancer by 49% (two-sided P<0.00001), and non-invasive breast cancer by 50% (P<0.002). The occurrence of oestrogen receptor-(OR)-positive tumours decreased by 69%. Tamoxifen reduces the risk of developing oestrogen receptor-positive tumours, but OR-negative tumours are not affected. Rare but life-threatening side-effects of tamoxifen include endometrial carcinoma, thromboembolic events and cerebrovascular events. Less serious side-effects include cataracts, vasomotor instability, nausea and vaginal discharge. Raloxifene, a second-generation selective oestrogen receptor modulator, is approved for treatment of osteoporosis in post-menopausal women in the USA but it is not currently approved for breast cancer prevention outside of a clinical trial. Prevention studies involving raloxifene and aromatase inhibitors are currently being conducted.

Current comprehensive assessment and management of women at increased risk for breast cancer

The potential for reducing the risk of breast cancer through selective estrogen receptor modulators, aromatase inhibitors, and surgery has generated interest in the use of quantitative models of risk assessment. With the addition of ductal lavage cytology to traditional epidemiologic risk factors, a discovery of cellular atypia can result in refinement of assigned risk values, while simultaneously optimizing patient selection for selective estrogen receptor modulators utilization. In view of increasing complexity in this arena, a Risk Assessment Working Group was formed to outline management strategies for the patient at an elevated risk for the development of breast cancer. No longer a statistical exercise, quantitative risk assessment is part of basic breast care and comprehensive management includes a discussion of the following: ductal lavage for improved risk stratification, multiple options for risk reduction, and high risk surveillance strategies that might incorporate investigational imaging protocols.

Effects of estrogen and raloxifene on neuroglia number and morphology in the hippocampus of aged female mice

Hormone replacement therapy with the gonadal steroid estrogen or synthetic agents such as raloxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, may affect cellular function in brains of postmenopausal women. In vitro studies suggest that 17beta estradiol and raloxifene can alter the microglial and astrocyte expression of immuno-neuronal modulators, such as cytokines, complement factors, chemokines, and other molecules involved in neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. To directly test whether exogenous 17beta estradiol and raloxifene affect the number of glial cells in brain, C57BL/6NIA female mice aged 20-24 months received bilateral ovariectomy followed by s.c. placement of a 60-day release pellet containing 17beta estradiol (1.7 mg), raloxifene (10 mg), or placebo (cholesterol). After 60 days, numbers of microglia and astrocytes were quantified in dentate gyrus and CA1 regions of the hippocampal formation using immunocytochemistry and design-based stereology. The results show that long-term 17beta estradiol treatment in aged female mice significantly lowered the numbers of astrocytes and microglial cells in dentate gyrus and CA1 regions compared with placebo. After long-term treatment with raloxifene, a similar reduction was observed in numbers of astrocytes and microglial cells in the hippocampal formation. These findings indicate that estrogen and selective estrogen receptor modulators can influence glial-mediated inflammatory pathways and possibly protect against age- and disease-related neuropathology.

Acceptance of tamoxifen chemoprevention by physicians and women at risk

BACKGROUND

In the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) P-1 trial, tamoxifen was shown to reduce breast carcinoma risk by 49% in high-risk women. The purpose of the current study was to identify factors associated with being offered, and accepting, tamoxifen chemoprevention.

METHODS

The records of 219 women who sought risk evaluation after the publication of the NSABP P-1 trial between September 1998 and October 2002 were reviewed. Risk was calculated using the model of either Gail et al. or Claus et al. The impact of individual risk factors on the offering and acceptance of tamoxifen was compared using the Fisher exact test and logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Tamoxifen was offered to 137 women (63%) in the current study. The magnitude of Gail risk, age, menopausal status, hysterectomy, and history of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) or atypical hyperplasia (AH) were all found to be significant predictors of a patient being offered tamoxifen. On multivariate analysis, only a history of AH or LCIS and hysterectomy were found to be significant, with odds ratios of 20.3 and 3.4, respectively. Fifty-seven of the women who were offered tamoxifen (42%) took the drug. Only a history of LCIS or AH and older age were found to be predictive of tamoxifen acceptance.

CONCLUSIONS

In the current study, risk due to AH or LCIS was found to be the main predictor of being offered and accepting tamoxifen chemoprevention.

Atypia in the assessment of breast cancer risk: Implications for management

Proliferative disease accounts for as much as one-third of all biopsies for benign disease and 5-10% of proliferative lesions show atypia ductal or lobular hyperplasia. Nearly 40% of women with a family history of breast cancer and atypical hyperplasia subsequently develop breast cancer. A quantitative model developed by Gail and colleagues estimates the probability of developing breast cancer over time. Risk factors in the model include current age, ages at menarche and first live birth, number of previous biopsies, the presence of cellular atypia, and the number of first-degree relatives with breast cancer. Atypical hyperplasia approximately doubles the risk of developing invasive breast cancer within any quantitative risk profile. Ductal lavage provides a minimally invasive method of collecting breast epithelial cells. The procedure opens the possibility of repeatable tracking of breast cytology over time, but its role as a risk assessment tool remains to be fully defined.

Advances in breast cancer detection and management

Breast cancer detection and management have undergone dramatic changes over the past three decades. Women are increasingly diagnosed with early stage disease, and leaving them with breast conserving options versus mastectomy. Furthermore, advances in the chemoprevention arena offer the promise of reduced overall breast cancer burden in the future.

Management of the high-risk patient

Comprehensive breast cancer risk management is a practical tool that can now be regarded as a necessary clinical component of women's health. Risk assessment is the starting point for counseling women about risk, and it facilitates rational decision-making about prophylactic surgery, initiation of screening at an early age, and initiating preventive interventions. The availability of risk assessment models permit rapid risk calculation during routine clinical encounters, and risk profiles can be easily updated at subsequent clinical visits. Clinicians can now incorporate risk assessment and management into their routine screening and health maintenance appointments. Additional prospective clinical trials should be conducted to define the optimal use of existing management strategies, develop refined risk assessment instruments that incorporate additional risk-factor information, and evaluate populations for whom validated risk-assessment approaches do not yet exist.