Biphasic ER-α36-mediated estrogen signaling regulates growth of gastric cancer cells

Dual COX-2/5-LOX inhibitors from Zanthoxylum simulans inhibit gastric cancer cells by cross-mediating thyroid, estrogen, and oxytocin signaling pathways

Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) and 5-lipoxygenase (5-LOX) are overexpressed in gastric cancer cells, the dual inhibitors of which exhibit potential against metastasis and invasion with fewer side effects. To discover inhibitors targeting COX-2 and 5-LOX, we conducted ultrafiltration and enrichment calculation to screen candidates in quaternary alkaloids (QAs) from Zanthoxylum simulans through LC and LC-Q-TOF. For intensive peaks, peaks 19 (berberine) and 21 (chelerythrine) were observed as the most potent dual candidates and showed selective affinity to 5-LOX over COX-2. Peak 19 showed an enrichment at 4.36 for COX-2 and 22.81 for 5-LOX, while peak 21 showed an enrichment at 7.81 for COX-2 and 24.49 for 5-LOX. Molecular docking results revealed chelerythrine as a better dual inhibitor, showing time- and dose-dependent anti-proliferation against AGS cells. Bio-informatics strategies, such as Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), Gene Ontology (GO), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), suggested that hormone pathways in gastric cancer cells might be mediated by chelerythrine. Further reviews and summaries helped outline the mechanisms by which COX-2/5-LOX inhibitors might promote apoptosis in gastric cancer cells via estrogen, thyroid, and oxytocin signaling pathways. Chelerythrine was also added to gastric cancer cells to verify the regulation of these three signaling pathways. As a result, significant calling back of thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR), thyroid hormone α3 (TRα3), and thyroid hormone receptor β1 (TRβ1) and suppressing estrogen receptor α36 (ER-α36)-Src could benefit the anti-proliferation of chelerythrine. However, it was disappointing that regulation of estrogen receptor α66 (ER-α66), estrogen receptor β (ER-β), and oxytocin receptor (OTR) contributed inversely negative effects on anti-gastric cancer cells. At present, the integrative study not only revealed chelerythrine as the most potent dual COX-2/5-LOX inhibitor from QAs but also generally highlighted that comprehensive regulation of the estrogen, thyroid, and oxytocin pathway should be noted once gastric cancer cells were treated with inflammatory inhibitors.

Identification of Hub Genes Associated With the Development of Stomach Adenocarcinoma by Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis

Objective

This study was conducted in order to gain a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD), which is necessary to predict the prognosis of STAD and develop novel gene therapy strategies.

Methods

In this study, the gene expression profile of GSE118916 in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas Program (TCGA) was used to explore the differential co-expression genes of STAD and normal tissues.

Results

A total of 407 STAD samples were collected, consisting of 375 from stomach adenocarcinoma tissues and 32 from normal tissues, as well as RNA-seq count data for 19,600 genes. Forty-two differentially expressed genes were screened by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and differentially expressed gene analysis. According to the functional annotation analysis of the clusterProfiler R package, these genes were analyzed for GO function enrichment, digestion (biological process), tube bottom material membrane (cell component), and oxidoreductase activity (molecular function). The KEGG pathway was enriched in gastric acid secretion and chemical carcinogenesis. In addition, Cytoscape's cytoHubba plug-in was used to identify seven hub genes (EWSR1, ESR1, CLTC, PCMT1, TP53, HUWE1, and HDAC1) in a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network consisting of 7 nodes and 11 edges. Compared with normal tissues, CLTC and TP53 genes were upregulated in stomach adenocarcinoma (P < 0.05). TP53 was expressed differently in stages II and IV, EWSR1 was expressed differently in stages II and III, and ESR1 was expressed differently in stages I-III. Among the seven hub genes, Kaplan-Meier analysis and TCGG showed that the expression levels of HDAC1 and CLTC were significantly correlated with OS in patients with stomach adenocarcinoma (P < 0.05). GEPIA2 analysis showed that ESR1 expression was closely correlated with OS and DFS in gastric adenocarcinoma (P < 0.05). Then, the expression of the genes and their correlations were revealed by the R2 Platform (http://r2.amc.nl). Finally, we collected 18 pairs of gastric mucosal tissues from normal people and cancer tissues from patients with stomach adenocarcinoma. The expression levels of the above seven hub genes and their relative protein expression were detected by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC). The results showed that the gene and protein expression levels in stomach adenocarcinoma tissues were increased than those in the normal group.

Conclusion

In summary, we believe that the identified hub genes were related to the occurrence of stomach adenocarcinoma, especially the expression of ESR1, HDAC1, and CLTC genes, which are related to the prognosis and overall survival of patients and may become the potential for the future diagnosis and treatment of STAD.

A Network Pharmacology Study Based on the Mechanism of Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium-Pinelliae Rhizoma in the Treatment of Gastric Cancer

Objective

To explore the mechanism of action of Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium-Pinelliae Rhizoma (CRP-PR) in treating gastric cancer (GC) by using pharmacology network.

Methods

Based on oral bioavailability and drug-likeness, the main active components of CRP-PR were screened using the Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology Database and Analysis Platform (TCMSP). DisGeNET Database was used to establish target databases for GC. Cytoscape software was used to construct a visual interactive network diagram of “Active Component-Target” and screen out the key targets. The STRING database was used to construct a protein interaction network. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis were performed on the key targets. Additionally, TCGA and HPA databases were used for key target verification.

Results

Thirty-seven active components of CRP-PR were screened. The results of network analysis showed that the main components include 8-octadecenoic acid, stigmasterol, ferulic acid, and naringenin of the CRP-PR herb pair. The key targets of the PPI network mainly involved GAPDH, MAPK3, JUN, STAT3, GSK3B, SIRT1, ERBB2, and SMAD2. GO enrichment analysis involves 540 biological processes, 118 cellular components, and 171 molecular functions. CRP-PR components were predicted to exert their therapeutic effect on the tumor signaling pathway, PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, MAPK signaling pathway, and estrogen signaling pathway. The validation of the key genes in the TCGA and HPA database showed that most of the key target verification results were consistent with this article.

Conclusion

CRP-PR can treat GC by mediating PI3K-Akt signal pathway, MAPK signal pathway, and other biological processes such as tumor cell proliferation, apoptosis, and vascular regeneration, which embodies the synergistic effect of multi-components, multi-targets, and multi-channels, and provides the theoretical basis and research ideas for further study of CRP-PR in treating GC. 8-octadecenoic acid, stigmasterol, ferulic acid, and naringenin may be the material basis for the treatment of GC.

GPER1 Silencing Suppresses the Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion of Gastric Cancer Cells by Inhibiting PI3K/AKT-Mediated EMT

G protein coupled estrogen receptor (GPER1) is a membrane estrogen receptor, belonging to the seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors family, and has important biological functions in cancer. However, the functional role of GPER1 in gastric cancer (GC) remain incompletely understood. In the present study, we employed gene set enrichment analysis and discovered that GPER1 expression was concomitant with EMT process and was positively correlated with activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway in GC. Knockdown of GPER1 with siRNA suppressed the proliferation, migration, and invasion of AGS and MGC-803 GC cells. Knockdown of GPER1 also downregulated the mesenchymal markers N-cadherin and vimentin, upregulated E-cadherin, an epithelial marker, and suppressed expression of the Snail, Slug and Twist1 transcription factors, indicating that knockdown of GPER1 inhibited EMT. Moreover, 740Y-P, a PI3K activator, reversed the effects of GPER1 knockdown on EMT processes. Overexpression of GPER1 with plasmid can further prove these findings. In summary, these data demonstrate that GPER1 inhibition suppresses the proliferation, migration, and invasion of gastric cancer cells by inhibiting PI3K/AKT-mediated EMT. Our study elucidated the function of GPER1 in gastric cancer, and we identified PI3K/AKT-mediated EMT as a novel mechanism by which GPER1 contributes to proliferation, migration, and invasion of gastric cancer. These data suggest that combining inhibition of GPER1 and PI3K may be a potential therapeutic approach to inhibit gastric cancer metastasis.

The Sex Bias of Cancer

In hormone-dependent organs, sex hormones and dysregulated hormone signaling have well-documented roles in cancers of the breast and female reproductive organs including endometrium and ovary, as well as in prostate and testicular cancers in males. Strikingly, epidemiological data highlight significant differences between the sexes in the incidence of various cancers in nonreproductive organs, where the role of sex hormones has been less well studied. In an era when personalized medicine is gaining recognition, understanding the molecular, cellular, and biological differences between men and women is timely for developing more appropriate therapeutic interventions according to gender. We review evidence that sex hormones also shape many of the dysregulated cellular and molecular pathways that lead to cell proliferation and cancer in nonreproductive organs.

IRF-2 Inhibits Gastric Cancer Invasion and Migration by Down-Regulating MMP-1

PURPOSE

The interferon regulatory factor 2 (IRF-2) acted as a tumor suppressor. We inspected IRF-2 as a predictor of prognosis in gastric cancer (GC) patients and tried to find out the potential molecular mechanism.

METHODS

In this study, the association between IRF-2 expression and clinical or prognosis significance was investigated in 86 pairs of tumor and the adjacent normal gastric tissues from GC patients. After establishing the stable cell lines, the Transwell assays were deduced to evaluate the malignancy of tumor. Then, microarray assay was carried out and the GO/KEGG pathway analyses were conducted to identify IRF-2's target gene. The relationship between IRF-2 and matrix metalloproteinases 1 (MMP-1) was also investigated by the immunohistochemistry in 15 pairs of tumor and adjacent normal gastric tissues.

RESULTS

We found that IRF-2 expression level in GC was significantly correlated with the prognosis of the patients. Transwell assays suggested an impaired ability of invasion and migration in IRF-2-overexpressed GC cells and a progressive malignant phenotype in IRF-2-knockdown GC cells. Ninety differentially expressed genes were found between IRF-2-overexpressed GC cells and its normal control sets by microarray. We demonstrated that MMP-1 was canonical in the network of differentially expressed genes by GO and KEGG pathway analysis and its expression level was markedly decreased in IRF-2-overexpressed cells of MKN-45 and increased in IRF-2-knockdown cells of SGC-7901. The expression of MMP-1 was inversely correlated with IRF-2 in GAC TMA specimens.

CONCLUSION

IRF-2 may inhibit GC progression by down-regulating MMP-1 level.

Estrogen receptor-α36-mediated rapid estrogen signaling regulates 78 kDa glucose-regulated protein expression in gastric carcinoma cells

To determine whether estrogen receptor-α36 (ER-α36) -mediated rapid estrogen signaling is associated with 78 kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP78) expression in gastric cancer, 86 samples of gastric tumor tissue with corresponding normal and tumor-adjacent tissues were used to examine expression patterns of GRP78 and ER-α36. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated that 55/86 (63.95%) patients with gastric carcinoma, and western blot analysis revealed that GRP78 was upregulated in 15/20 (75%) of tumor specimens. GRP78 expression was positively associated with ER-α36 expression, the male sex and lymph node metastasis (P<0.05). Estrogen treatment increased GRP78 and ER-α36 expression, as well as GSK-3β phosphorylation in established gastric cancer SGC-7901 cells. The steady-state level of GRP78 protein expression and the level of phosphorylated GSK-3β at Ser9 were decreased in SGC-7901 cells with ER-α36 knockdown. Forced expression of ER-α36 in SGC-7901 cells, however, led to an increase in GRP78 expression and GSK-3β phosphorylation. It may therefore be concluded that ER-α36-mediated rapid estrogen signaling positively regulates GRP78 expression, presumably via the GSK-3β pathway, which may be associated with gastric carcinogenesis.

Expression of estrogen receptors and androgen receptor and their clinical significance in gastric cancer

Despite the mounting studies exploring the role of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) and androgen receptor (AR) in gastric cancer (GC), there remain controversies in those findings. The present study investigated the expression of ERα, ERβ and AR in Chinese gastric cancer by immunohistochemistry, analyzed their clinical relevance in gastric cancer, and examined the potential mechanisms by which ERα and AR modulated GC progression. The positive rate of ERα, ERβ and AR in GC tissues was 6% (9/150), 93.5% (143/153), and 42.4% (59/139), respectively. The expression of ERα was an independent unfavorable risk factor for overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.639, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.432-9.246, p = 0.007) for GC patients. Moreover, AR was borderline significantly associated with poor progress free survival (PFS) after adjustment with other variables (HR = 1.573, 95% CI = 0.955-2.592, p = 0.075). Knockdown of ERα inhibited the proliferation, migration and invasion of GC cells possibly via modulating the expression of p53, p21, p27, cyclin D1 and E-cadherin. Downregulation of AR suppressed the migration and invasion of GC cells and inhibited the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) associated pathways.

Increased survival rates in gastric cancer, with a narrowing gender gap and widening socioeconomic status gap: A period analysis from 1984 to 2013

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Gastric cancer (GC) has the fifth highest incidence rate of all cancers and has a poor prognosis. However, no recent large-scale and long-term studies have evaluated the incidence and survival rates of individuals with GC.

METHODS

In order to explore the change of GC incidence and survival rates by age, gender, race, and socioeconomic status (SES), incidence data and survival status of patients with GC between 1984 and 2013 were abstracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Totally, 87 242 cases of GC were exported and were analyzed.

RESULTS

During these three decades, the incidence of GC was 7.4, 6.8, and 5.5 per 100 000 individuals in each decade. The 1-year relative survival rates (RSRs) improved from 42.4% to 44.3% to 49.0% (P < 0.0001), with a larger increase seen in the third decade. However, the long-term survival rates remained low (from 17.8% to 20.3% to 22.9% for the 5-year RSRs, P < 0.0001; from 14.1% to 16.4% to 18.6% for the 10-year RSRs, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Our analysis demonstrated the decreased incidence and increased survival rate of GC. In addition, lower SES was associated with lower survival rates. It is notable that others (primarily for Asians) had the highest incidence rate but had better outcomes than Whites and Blacks.

Effects of 17β-estradiol and tamoxifen on gastric cancer cell proliferation and apoptosis and ER-α36 expression

The present study aimed to investigate the effects of 17β-estradiol and tamoxifen, an agonist and inhibitor of the estrogen receptor (ER), respectively, on the proliferation and apoptosis of gastric cancer cells, as well as the messenger (m)RNA expression levels of ER-α36. Nested reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) confirmed that ER-α36 was expressed in the BGC823, MKN45 and SGC7901 human gastric cancer cell lines. Subsequently, the BGC823 cell line was stimulated with various concentrations of 17β-estradiol or tamoxifen for 24 or 48 h, and the proliferation, apoptosis and mRNA expression levels of ER-α36 were determined by water-soluble tetrazolium (WST)-1 assay, flow cytometry and RT-quantitative PCR, respectively. The activity of BGC823 cells was significantly increased following treatment with 10⁻¹² mol/l 17β-estradiol for 24 h (P=0.013), as compared with the control, and reached a peak at 48 h (P=0.002). Notably, the activity of BGC823 cells was decreased with increasing concentrations of 17β-estradiol, although it remained higher compared with that of the control. In the tamoxifen-treated groups, the cell activity decreased as the drug concentration increased. The apoptosis rate was markedly reduced in the 17β-estradiol group after 24 h (10⁻¹² mol/l, P=0.013; 10⁻¹¹ mol/l, P=0.023; and 10⁻¹⁰ mol/l, P=0.017) and after 48 h (10⁻¹² mol/l, P=0.002; 10⁻¹¹ mol/l, P=0.011; and 10⁻¹⁰ mol/l, P=0.033), whereas the rate of apoptosis increased as the tamoxifen concentration increased (24 h: 5×10⁻⁶ mol/l, P=0.002; and 10⁻⁵ mol/l, P=0.001; and 48 h: 5×10⁻⁶ mol/l, P=0.014 and 10⁻⁵ mol/l, P=0.0021), as compared with the control group. The mRNA expression levels of ER-α36 were significantly increased after 24 h of treatment with 10⁻¹² mol/l (P=0.024), 10⁻¹¹ mol/l (P=0.0113) and 10⁻¹⁰ mol/l (P=0.0037) 17β-estradiol compared with the control group when the concentration of 17β-estradiol was low, and the same was observed after 48 h of treatment 10⁻¹² mol/l (P=0.0164), 10⁻¹¹ mol/l (P=0.0342) and 10⁻¹⁰ mol/l (P=0.0198) 17β-estradiol. The mRNA expression levels of ER-α36 were significantly decreased with increasing concentrations of tamoxifen after 24 h (5×10⁻⁶ mol/l, P=0.0233; and 10⁻⁵ mol/l, P=0.007) and after 48 h (5×10⁻⁶ mol/l, P=0.001; and 10⁻⁵ mol/l, P=0.0153). In addition, the ability of tamoxifen to inhibit the growth of gastric cancer cells was concentration-dependent. The results of the present study suggested that gastric cancer cells were sensitive to the effects of 17β-estradiol and tamoxifen, and that tamoxifen is able to induce gastric cancer cell apoptosis. The expression levels of ER-α36 were upregulated, and the growth of gastric cancer cells was increased, following treatment with 17β-estradiol, thus suggesting that gastric cancer tumors are stimulated by estrogen.

Role of estrogen receptors in digestive system tumors

Estrogen receptors are steroid hormone receptors that modulate the expression of target genes when bound to ligand. Humans have two ligand-activated transcription factors that bind to estrogen, encoded by separate genes, estrogen receptor α (ERα) and estrogen receptor β (ERβ). In addition, the membrane localized G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1) can be activated by estradiol and mediate non-genomic signaling. Many studies have described the role of estrogen receptors in human cancers. Digestive system tumors account for a large proportion of all the tumors, and the mortality is very high in many digestive system tumors, such as esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, colorectal cancer, cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic carcinoma. This review summarizes the role of estrogen receptors in digestive system tumors, aiming at finding new routes for the rational design of targeted anticancer therapies for digestive system tumors.