|
1
|
Magut FJ, Degu A. Drug therapy problems among paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia patients at Kenyatta National Hospital. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2024:10781552241256811. [PMID: 38831652 DOI: 10.1177/10781552241256811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Several studies reported that drug therapy problems (DTPs) were prevalent in cancer patients. These DTPs are still interfering with the desired treatment outcomes in patients with cancer. This study aimed to determine the prevalence, types and predictors of DTPs among paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) patients at Kenyatta National Hospital. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was used to assess DTPs among ALL patients. Records of all eligible paediatric patients with ALL who received treatment in the facility between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2021 were examined. A data abstraction tool was employed for data collection. The data entry and analysis were carried out by a statistical package for social sciences version 29.0 software. Frequency tables were utilised to present the key findings of the study. Binary logistic regression analysis was utilised to determine the predictors of DTPs. RESULTS A total of 82 DTPs were identified with the most common type of DTP being adverse drug reaction (ADR; 59, 72.0%) and drug interaction (9, 11.0%). The most common ADRs identified were febrile neutropenia (20, 33.9%), nausea/vomiting (14, 23.7%) and anaemia (11, 18.6%). Patients with central nervous system disease (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 10.2, 95% CI = 1.2-85.8, p = 0.03) and treated with a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy (AOR = 13.5, 95% CI = 1.9-89.4, p = 0.01) were more likely to develop DTPs. CONCLUSION The study found that the prevalence of DTPs among paediatric ALL patients was high, with the most common DTPs being ADRs occurring in 72.0% of patients. Central nervous system metastasis and a combination of chemotherapy and radiation treatment regimens were statistically significant predictors of DTPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faith Jelagat Magut
- Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, United States International University-Africa, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Amsalu Degu
- Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, United States International University-Africa, Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Zhao DY, Hu SQ, Hu FH, Du W, Tang W, Zhang WQ, Chen HL, Shen WQ. Palliative care for cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative synthesis from 36 studies of 16 countries. J Clin Nurs 2023; 32:6120-6135. [PMID: 37212652 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the COVID-19 epidemic, palliative care has become even more indispensable for cancer patients. AIM To identify the changes in palliative care for cancer patients and improvements in palliative care quality during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN A systematic review and narrative synthesis was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. An evaluation tool using mixed methods was used to assess the quality of the study. The main relevant themes identified were used to group qualitative and quantitative findings. RESULTS A total of 36 studies were identified, primarily from different countries, with a total of 14,427 patients, 238 caregivers and 354 health care providers. Cancer palliative care has been experiencing several difficulties following the COVID-19 pandemic, including increased mortality and infection rates as well as delays in patient treatment that have resulted in poorer prognoses. Treatment providers are seeking solutions such as electronic management of patients and integration of resources to care for the mental health of patients and staff. Telemedicine plays an important role in many ways but cannot completely replace traditional treatment. Clinicians strive to meet patients' palliative care needs during special times and improve their quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Palliative care faces unique challenges during the COVID-19 epidemic. With adequate support to alleviate care-related challenges, patients in the home versus hospital setting will be able to receive better palliative care. In addition, this review highlights the importance of multiparty collaboration to achieve personal and societal benefits of palliative care. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION No Patient or Public Contribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan-Yan Zhao
- School of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Shi-Qi Hu
- School of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Fei-Hong Hu
- School of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Wei Du
- School of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Wen Tang
- School of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Wan-Qing Zhang
- School of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Hong-Lin Chen
- School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Wang-Qin Shen
- School of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Velasco Yanez R, Frota Goyanna N, Carvalho Fernandes A, Moura Barbosa Castro R, Holanda da Cunha G, Silva Ferreira I, Miranda Mattos S, Magalhães Moreira T. Palliative Care in Breast Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2023; 40:351-364. [PMID: 35581537 PMCID: PMC9127630 DOI: 10.1177/10499091221101879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has harmed the provision of palliative care (PC) services for women with breast cancer due to all the restrictions that came along with the virus. OBJECTIVE To map the available evidence on the situation of PC in breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS A scoping review was carried out based on the methodology proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The search was conducted in nine databases, one electronic repository, and one library, using controlled vocabularies. RESULTS Twenty-nine articles and seven documents were included. The majority (11.4% each) were published in the United Kingdom, Italy, and the United States, 38.9% addressed palliative radiotherapy (RT), and 47.2% consisted of recommendations. From the content analysis, five categories were obtained focused on the recommendations on changes in palliative treatment guidelines and the response of PC teams to the evolving crisis. CONCLUSIONS The evidence pointed to the management of general PC, palliative RT, palliative chemotherapy, management of metastatic breast cancer, and use of technologies in palliative care. No recommendations were found to manage frequent symptoms in PC, indicating the need to develop primary studies that investigate these aspects in detail in this vulnerable group. IMPLICATIONS The results contained in this document can provide professionals working in this field of care with a global view of how other teams have dealt with the pandemic, thereby identifying the best guidelines to apply in their reality, taking into account the clinical and social situation of each patient.
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Zapała J, Matecka M, Zok A, Baum E. The needs of cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic-psychosocial, ethical and spiritual aspects-systematic review. PeerJ 2022; 10:e13480. [PMID: 35789657 PMCID: PMC9250307 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in unprecedented changes in the functioning of the health care system, which were connected with the occurrence of new challenges for both the health care system's employees and for the patients. The purpose of the present article is to analyze the needs of persons with oncological diseases. Taking into account the multiple aspects of the term health, psychological, social, and existential needs of the patients were analyzed. This article is directed mainly at persons who remain in a direct therapeutic relation with a patient. It is to facilitate recognizing the needs of ill people and to increase sensitivity to the issue of maintaining or improving the well-being of patients which requires paying special attention to their psychological, social, and existential needs during the period of hindered access to the health care system. This systematic review takes advantage of quantitative and qualitative methods of text analysis with phenomenological analysis factored in. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the appearance of new problems in the population of oncological patients or it made the existing problems more severe. As a consequence, it made it significantly more difficult to meet their needs on various levels and sometimes it even made it impossible. It seems necessary to determine and introduce strategies to ensure that patients with oncological diseases have access to psychological and spiritual support in the period of the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Zapała
- Department of Postgraduate Studies, SWPS University, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Monika Matecka
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Zok
- Division of Philosophy of Medicine and Bioethics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | - Ewa Baum
- Department of Social Sciences and the Humanities, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Wong YNS, Sng CCT, Ottaviani D, Patel G, Chowdhury A, Earnshaw I, Sinclair A, Merry E, Wu A, Galazi M, Benafif S, Soosaipillai G, Chopra N, Roylance R, Shaw H, Lee AJX. Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy and Metastatic Cancer Are Independent Mortality Risk Factors during Two UK Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic at University College London Hospital. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:6085. [PMID: 34885194 PMCID: PMC8657102 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13236085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
An increased mortality risk was observed in patients with cancer during the first wave of COVID-19. Here, we describe determinants of mortality in patients with solid cancer comparing the first and second waves of COVID-19. A retrospective analysis encompassing two waves of COVID-19 (March-May 2020; December 2020-February 2021) was performed. 207 patients with cancer were matched to 452 patients without cancer. Patient demographics and oncological variables such as cancer subtype, staging and anti-cancer treatment were evaluated for association with COVID-19 mortality. Overall mortality was lower in wave two compared to wave one, HR 0.41 (95% CI: 0.30-0.56). In patients with cancer, mortality was 43.6% in wave one and 15.9% in wave two. In hospitalized patients, after adjusting for age, ethnicity and co-morbidities, a history of cancer was associated with increased mortality in wave one but not wave two. In summary, the second UK wave of COVID-19 is associated with lower mortality in hospitalized patients. A history of solid cancer was not associated with increased mortality despite the dominance of the more transmissible B.1.1.7 SARS-CoV-2 variant. In both waves, metastatic disease and systemic anti-cancer treatment appeared to be independent risk factors for death within the combined cancer cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yien Ning Sophia Wong
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK; (Y.N.S.W.); (C.C.T.S.); (D.O.); (G.P.); (A.C.); (I.E.); (A.S.); (E.M.); (A.W.); (M.G.); (S.B.); (G.S.); (N.C.); (R.R.); (H.S.)
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Christopher C. T. Sng
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK; (Y.N.S.W.); (C.C.T.S.); (D.O.); (G.P.); (A.C.); (I.E.); (A.S.); (E.M.); (A.W.); (M.G.); (S.B.); (G.S.); (N.C.); (R.R.); (H.S.)
| | - Diego Ottaviani
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK; (Y.N.S.W.); (C.C.T.S.); (D.O.); (G.P.); (A.C.); (I.E.); (A.S.); (E.M.); (A.W.); (M.G.); (S.B.); (G.S.); (N.C.); (R.R.); (H.S.)
| | - Grisma Patel
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK; (Y.N.S.W.); (C.C.T.S.); (D.O.); (G.P.); (A.C.); (I.E.); (A.S.); (E.M.); (A.W.); (M.G.); (S.B.); (G.S.); (N.C.); (R.R.); (H.S.)
| | - Amani Chowdhury
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK; (Y.N.S.W.); (C.C.T.S.); (D.O.); (G.P.); (A.C.); (I.E.); (A.S.); (E.M.); (A.W.); (M.G.); (S.B.); (G.S.); (N.C.); (R.R.); (H.S.)
| | - Irina Earnshaw
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK; (Y.N.S.W.); (C.C.T.S.); (D.O.); (G.P.); (A.C.); (I.E.); (A.S.); (E.M.); (A.W.); (M.G.); (S.B.); (G.S.); (N.C.); (R.R.); (H.S.)
| | - Alasdair Sinclair
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK; (Y.N.S.W.); (C.C.T.S.); (D.O.); (G.P.); (A.C.); (I.E.); (A.S.); (E.M.); (A.W.); (M.G.); (S.B.); (G.S.); (N.C.); (R.R.); (H.S.)
| | - Eve Merry
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK; (Y.N.S.W.); (C.C.T.S.); (D.O.); (G.P.); (A.C.); (I.E.); (A.S.); (E.M.); (A.W.); (M.G.); (S.B.); (G.S.); (N.C.); (R.R.); (H.S.)
| | - Anjui Wu
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK; (Y.N.S.W.); (C.C.T.S.); (D.O.); (G.P.); (A.C.); (I.E.); (A.S.); (E.M.); (A.W.); (M.G.); (S.B.); (G.S.); (N.C.); (R.R.); (H.S.)
| | - Myria Galazi
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK; (Y.N.S.W.); (C.C.T.S.); (D.O.); (G.P.); (A.C.); (I.E.); (A.S.); (E.M.); (A.W.); (M.G.); (S.B.); (G.S.); (N.C.); (R.R.); (H.S.)
| | - Sarah Benafif
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK; (Y.N.S.W.); (C.C.T.S.); (D.O.); (G.P.); (A.C.); (I.E.); (A.S.); (E.M.); (A.W.); (M.G.); (S.B.); (G.S.); (N.C.); (R.R.); (H.S.)
| | - Gehan Soosaipillai
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK; (Y.N.S.W.); (C.C.T.S.); (D.O.); (G.P.); (A.C.); (I.E.); (A.S.); (E.M.); (A.W.); (M.G.); (S.B.); (G.S.); (N.C.); (R.R.); (H.S.)
| | - Neha Chopra
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK; (Y.N.S.W.); (C.C.T.S.); (D.O.); (G.P.); (A.C.); (I.E.); (A.S.); (E.M.); (A.W.); (M.G.); (S.B.); (G.S.); (N.C.); (R.R.); (H.S.)
| | - Rebecca Roylance
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK; (Y.N.S.W.); (C.C.T.S.); (D.O.); (G.P.); (A.C.); (I.E.); (A.S.); (E.M.); (A.W.); (M.G.); (S.B.); (G.S.); (N.C.); (R.R.); (H.S.)
- NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - Heather Shaw
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK; (Y.N.S.W.); (C.C.T.S.); (D.O.); (G.P.); (A.C.); (I.E.); (A.S.); (E.M.); (A.W.); (M.G.); (S.B.); (G.S.); (N.C.); (R.R.); (H.S.)
| | - Alvin J. X. Lee
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK; (Y.N.S.W.); (C.C.T.S.); (D.O.); (G.P.); (A.C.); (I.E.); (A.S.); (E.M.); (A.W.); (M.G.); (S.B.); (G.S.); (N.C.); (R.R.); (H.S.)
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| |
Collapse
|