Proposed medications for taxane-induced myalgia and arthralgia (Review)

Assessing the effectiveness of gabapentin in paclitaxel-induced arthralgia, myalgia, and neuropathic pain: An observational, cohort study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Arthralgia, myalgia, and neuropathic pain are the most common side effects observed due to paclitaxel chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the prophylactic role, maintenance, remission, and re-occurrence of arthralgia, myalgia, and neuropathic pain post-gabapentin therapy.

METHODOLOGY

This study was conducted in the Department of Oncology, Dhiraj Hospital, Vadodara with a sample of 51 patients. Newly detected cancer patients who observed arthralgia, myalgia, and neuropathic pain due to paclitaxel were taken and a baseline pain assessment was done using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and painDETECT questionnaire. Gabapentin was given in the first cycle after symptoms appeared and prophylactic treatment was given in the subsequent three cycles and evaluation of pain was done post-gabapentin therapy to assess the symptomatic as well as prophylactic effect.

RESULTS

At baseline, neuropathic pain score was 22.7 ± 3.6 which reduced to 0.01 ± 0.14 on subsequent follow-ups. Grade 2 arthralgia, myalgia, and neuropathic pain were more observed at baseline which reduces to Grade 0 in the third cycle. The difference in baseline and post-gabapentin therapy was statistically analyzed by conducting t-test which showed p-value <0.00001 and t-value was less than -2 which indicated a statistically significant result.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that gabapentin reduces neuropathic pain. Prophylactic usage of gabapentin was highly effective at bringing about quick pain relief when compared to symptomatic treatment. In further follow-ups, it was noted that gabapentin maintained the impact throughout the cycles.

Flupirtine in the Management of Taxane-induced Pain in Cancer Patients

Objectives:

Paclitaxel and docetaxel are two commonly used chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of various types of cancers. However, debilitating taxane-induced arthralgia and myalgia are among the most common adverse reactions associated with taxanes, which has greatly influenced medical practitioners. Most of the mild and moderate analgesics were found to be less effective in the management of taxane induced pain. So we used flupirtine, a non-opioid analgesic, in the treatment of taxane-induced pain.

Materials and Methods:

In this study, we analysed the baseline pain score and follow-up data of 60 patients receiving a taxane-based chemotherapy regimen. Baseline data of these study populations experiencing significant taxane-induced pain were compared with follow-up data after treating them with analgesic flupirtine (200 mg/day). The baseline and follow-up data representing pain were assessed with the help of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the quality of life was determined using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) scale questionnaire.

Results:

The mean baseline and follow-up VAS score was compared using paired sample t-test, which showed a significant reduction in taxane-induced pain after treatment with flupirtine (P < 0.001). Similarly, the mean BPI score representing the quality of life before and after treatment with flupirtine was compared, and a notable improvement in quality of life was seen after treatment with flupirtine. The mean and follow-up data of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels of patients were also compared to assess the adverse drug reaction profile of the drug, and the analyzed data was found to be statistically insignificant (no significant liver toxicity) which indicates that drug can be used effectively for a period of <2 weeks.

Conclusion:

We believe that flupirtine can be used as an effective analgesic in dire situations where patients require opioid analgesics for the management of taxane-induced pain, provided that the drug is given for <2 weeks to avoid drug-related hepatotoxicity.

Decision on Chemotherapy Amidst COVID-19 Pandemic: a Review and a Practical Approach from Iran

To provide a step-by-step approach to chemotherapy (CTx) in the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era. The COVID-19 pandemic is the current global issue resulting in vast health implications. Amid the COVID-19 era, special attention must be paid to at-risk groups, including patients with cancer. To our knowledge, there is a paucity of data on the decision for CTx during the pandemic. We herein provide practical recommendations on the CTx of cancer patients over the pandemic based on our experience in an educational hospital. The decision on CTx should be considered to be individualized based on clinical findings. We hope that our experience provides a practical guide for clinical oncologists to deliver more effective cancer care over the COVID-19 pandemic.

Comprehensive review on how platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy of ovarian cancer affects biology of normal cells

One of the most neglected aspects of chemotherapy are changes, and possible consequences of these changes, that occur in normal somatic cells. In this review, we summarize effects of selected drugs used to treat ovarian cancer (platin derivatives-cisplatin and carboplatin; and taxanes-paclitaxel and docetaxel) on cellular metabolism, acquisition of reactive stroma features, cellular senescence, inflammatory reactions, apoptosis, autophagy, mitophagy, oxidative stress, DNA damage, and angiogenesis in various types of normal cells, including fibroblasts, epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and neurons. The activity of these drugs against the normal cells is presented from a broader perspective of their desirable anti-tumoral effects.

Predictive factors for taxane acute pain syndrome determined by ordered logistic regression analysis

This retrospective study was undertaken to identify predictive factors for developing taxane acute pain syndrome (TAPS) and to determine new strategies for improving QoL in patients undergoing chemotherapy. Between November 2010 and May 2018, we enrolled 121 breast cancer patients at our outpatient chemotherapy center who were undergoing chemotherapy with nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) every 3 weeks. Variables related to the development of TAPS were extracted from the patients' clinical records and used for regression analysis. The degree of TAPS was classified as grade 0 = not developed; grade 1 = developed but did not require analgesics; grade 2 = developed but alleviated by analgesics such as acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); or grade 3 = syndrome developed, causing sleep problems or interfering with daily living activities, but not alleviated by analgesics such as acetaminophen or NSAIDs thus requiring opioids. Multivariate ordered logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for the development of TAPS. Significant factors identified for the development of TAPS included dose of nab-PTX (odds ratio (OR) = 11.717, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 11.6161-11.8182; P = 0.0421) and the administration of dexamethasone for up to 3 days (OR = 0.133, 95% CI = 0.0235-0.7450; P = 0.0223). In conclusion, a high dose of nab-PTX and the lack of dexamethasone administration for up to 3 days were identified as significant predictors of the development of TAPS.

Taxane acute pain syndrome (TAPS) in patients receiving chemotherapy for breast or prostate cancer: a prospective multi-center study

BACKGROUND

Taxane acute pain syndrome (TAPS) is characterized by myalgias and arthralgias starting 2-3 days after taxane-based chemotherapy and lasting up to 7 days. In the absence of validated tools, many studies use the presence of both the myalgia and arthralgia components of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) to define TAPS. The present study prospectively evaluated the frequency, severity, and impact of TAPS in patients with breast or prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective, non-randomized study, patients with breast or prostate cancer commencing taxane-based chemotherapy completed the CTCAE (version 4.03), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Taxane (FACT-T), and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questionnaires at baseline and once between days 5 and 7 of each chemotherapy cycle.

RESULTS

From March 2015 to April 1, 2016, 75 patients (breast n = 66, prostate n = 9) were enrolled; 83% received docetaxel and 16% paclitaxel and 1% withdrew. After the first cycle of taxane, TAPS was reported by 25/69 (36.2%) patients; a further 8/69 (18.2%) reporting TAPS after a subsequent chemotherapy treatment. Overall incidence of TAPS was 33/75 (44%). While associated with detrimental scores on FACT-T and BPI as well as increased use of analgesics in 63% (21/33) of patients with TAPS, TAPS did not lead to alterations in chemotherapy dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

TAPS is common after taxane-based chemotherapy, and its presence is associated with reduced quality of life and increased analgesic requirements. Prospective patient-reported outcome assessments are crucial to help individualize treatment strategies and improve management of TAPS.

Docetaxel-associated myalgia-arthralgia syndrome in patients with breast cancer

Background

As taxanes are increasingly used in oncology, the myalgia–arthralgia syndrome (M-AS) that represents an adverse effect of these drugs is becoming more common. Nevertheless, information regarding predisposing factors, prevention, and therapy of the syndrome is still lacking.

Patients and methods

Women who had received docetaxel as part of the FEC-D(T) regimen for the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer were retrospectively identified from the records of our oncology department. Data on demographics, disease specifics, adverse effects, and treatment were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: those who developed M-AS after docetaxel treatment and those who did not develop the syndrome. The two groups were compared to identify risk factors for M-AS. Effectiveness of drugs used for M-AS was evaluated.

Results

Sixty-seven patients were identified as fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Nineteen patients developed the M-AS after the first docetaxel administration. Forty-eight patients did not develop the syndrome. Three patients in this group were excluded because they had been taking gabapentin or pregabalin at the time of docetaxel administration for another indication. The remaining 45 patients constituted the control group. The two groups were similar in age, menopause status, stage of their cancer, and histology. The M-AS group had a higher median body surface area and was more likely to receive less than the three intended cycles of docetaxel. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, atypical antiepileptics, extended corticosteroids, and opioids were drugs used as M-AS treatments.

Conclusion

Docetaxel-associated M-AS is an adverse effect causing incomplete drug treatment. Possible risk factors and effectiveness of treatments for the syndrome are presented.