Increase in bone density in patients with spondyloarthritis during anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: 6-year followup study

Effects of biologic and target synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs on sarcopenia in spondyloarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sarcopenia is a syndrome defined by generalized and progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass, strength, and function. Besides affecting elderly population, it is actually common among inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) patients. We performed a systematic literature review with a meta-analysis to investigate the influence of biologic and target synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs/tsDMARDs) on sarcopenia in IRD. A systematic search has been performed on Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of science. Studies characteristics were collected. Assessment tools were body composition (total lean mass (TLM) and percentage, appendicular skeletal mass (ASM), fat-free mass and index (FFM and FFMI), skeletal mass index (SMI) and segmental lean mass (SLM)), and muscle strength and physical performance tests. Treatment effect defined the difference in change from baseline to the end of follow-up treatment was divided by the pooled SD of the difference. Twenty-two studies on 778 patients receiving bDMARDs/tsDMARDs and 157 controls were reviewed. They investigated rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (N = 14), spondyloarthritis (SpA) (N = 6), psoriatic arthritis (N = 1), and both RA and SpA (N = 1). tsDMARDs were used in one study with no effect on sarcopenia. Ten studies demonstrated that bDMARDs increased significantly muscle measures in 347 patients (44.6%) with a significant increase in TLM (6/15 studies; 57.4%), FFMI (4/6 studies; 59.9%), ASM (2/5 studies; 17.6%), SMI (2/5 studies; 18.1%), and SLM (2/2 studies; 3.6%). bDMARDs showed also a positive effect on handgrip strength in 1/3 of studies (45.2%) and on physical performance in 1/2 of studies (61%). In 1/5 of comparative studies, IRD patients on bDMARDs showed significantly higher increase of TLM in comparison to controls naïve bDMARDs. Regarding diagnosis, positive effect of bDMARDs was seen in 67.4% in SpA versus 49.3% in RA, with a significant increase of TLM, ASM and FFMI in 59.4%, 100%, and 65.2% in SpA versus 54.9%, 24.1%, and 54.8% in RA, respectively. Meta-analysis assessed the effect of bDMARD on TLM in 10 studies. There was no statistically significant difference [SMD - 0.10 (95% Confidence Interval - 0.26 - 0.06; tau² = 0). Heterogeneity across studies was null, and the 95% confidence interval (index of precision) was equal to the 95% predictive interval. The first systematic literature review showed that bDMARDs have a significant improve effect in nearly half of RA and SpA patients on muscle mass and muscle strength, assessed separately. However, the meta-analysis concluded that bDMARDs have no significant effect on TLM.

Insights into the Role of Macrophage Polarization in the Pathogenesis of Osteoporosis

Millions of people worldwide suffer from osteoporosis, which causes bone fragility and increases the risk of fractures. Osteoporosis is closely related to the inhibition of osteogenesis and the enhancement of osteoclastogenesis. In addition, chronic inflammation and macrophage polarization may contribute to osteoporosis as well. Macrophages, crucial to inflammatory responses, display different phenotypes under the control of microenvironment. There are two major phenotypes, classically activated macrophages (M1) and alternatively activated macrophages (M2). Generally, M1 macrophages mainly lead to bone resorption, while M2 macrophages result in osteogenesis. M1/M2 ratio reflects the "fluid" state of macrophage polarization, and the imbalance of M1/M2 ratio may cause disease such as osteoporosis. Additionally, antioxidant drugs, such as melatonin, are applied to change the state of macrophage polarization and to treat osteoporosis. In this review, we introduce the mechanisms of macrophage polarization-mediated bone resorption and bone formation and the contribution to the clinical strategies of osteoporosis treatment.

Impact of lean and fat mass on disease activity and function in spondyloarthritis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Changes in body mass composition such as reduced lean and fat mass can occur in a patient with rheumatic diseases. However, data about body composition in spondyloarthritis (SpA) showed conflicting results. The aim of the present study was to assess by DXA the distribution of lean and fat mass in SpA patients compared to healthy controls and to investigate the association between body mass composition and disease characteristics.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional case-control study including 50 SpA patients and 50 controls. Sociodemographic data as well as disease characteristics were assessed. Body composition measurements, biochemical and inflammatory serum markers were evaluated. Radiographic data (Bath Ankylosing Radiologic Index and the modified Stroke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score was also recorded.

RESULTS

No statistically significant correlation was found between the two groups regarding bone mineral density, body mass distribution. However, a lower weight was observed in the study group compared to the control group (p=0.043). Male gender and younger age were associated with a higher lean mass (p=0.05). C-reactive protein (CRP) level was positively correlated with lean mass (r=0.38, p=0.023). Similarly, BASFI was higher in patients with lower fat mass (r=-0.42, p=0.024). A longer duration of NSAIDs intake was associated with a lower lean mass and a higher fat mass. However, no correlations were found between body mass composition and BASRI mSASSS scores as well as bone mineral density and calcium intake.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that younger age, male gender, and axial phenotype were associated with higher lean mass.

Bone Involvement in Patients with Spondyloarthropathies

Spondyloarthropathies (SpA) are common systemic inflammatory rheumatic diseases, in which, as in other rheumatic diseases, levels of markers of bone resorption are elevated, leading to bone loss and elevated risk of vertebral fractures. However, the diseases are also associated with new bone formation in the spine, the so-called syndesmophytes. We tried to unravel the pathogenesis of formation and growth of syndesmophytes and evaluated new diagnostic and treatment options. After a successful meeting of the Working Group on Rheumatic Diseases at the ECTS 2020, we (WL and CR) were excited about the quality of the speakers (CM, JH, AG, and GL) and their complimentary lectures. Given the relative lack of reviews on spondyloarthropathies and bone, we decided to work together on a comprehensive review that might be interesting for basic scientists and clinically relevant for clinicians. Radiographic progression in axSpA is linked to several risk factors, like male sex, smoking, HLA-B-27, increased levels of CRP, presence of syndesmophytes, and marked inflammation on MRI. The potential role of mechanical stress in the context of physically demanding jobs has been also suggested to promote structural damages. Different treatment options from NSAIDs to biologic agents like TNF inhibitors (TNFi) or IL-17inhibitors (IL-17i) result in a reduction of inflammation and symptoms. However, all these different treatment options failed to show clear and reproducible results on inhibition on syndesmophyte formation. The majority of data are available on TNFi, and some studies suggested an effect in subgroups of patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Less information is available on NSAIDs and IL-17i. Since IL-17i have been introduced quite recently, more studies are expected. IL-17 inhibitors (Il-17i) potently reduce signs and symptoms, but serum level of IL-17 is not elevated, therefore, IL-17 probably has mainly a local effect. The failure of anti-IL-23 in axSpA suggests that IL-17A production could be independent from IL-23. It may be upregulated by TNFα, resulting in lower expression of DKK1 and RANKL and an increase in osteogenesis. In active AS markers of bone resorption are increased, while bone formation markers can be increased or decreased. Bone Turnover markers and additional markers related to Wnt such as DKK1, sclerostin, and RANKL are valuable for elucidating bone metabolism on a group level and they are not (yet) able to predict individual patient outcomes. The gold standard for detection of structural lesions in clinical practice is the use of conventional radiographics. However, the resolution is low compared to the change over time and the interval for detecting changes are 2 years or more. Modern techniques offer substantial advantages such as the early detection of bone marrow edema with MRI, the fivefold increased detection rate of new or growing syndesmophytes with low-dose CT, and the decrease in 18F-fluoride uptake during treatment with TNFα-inhibitors (TNFi) in a pilot study in 12 AS patients. Detection of bone involvement by new techniques, such as low-dose CT, MRI and 18-Fluoride PET-scans, and bone turnover markers, in combination with focusing on high-risk groups such as patients with early disease, elevated CRP, syndesmophytes at baseline, male patients and patients with HLA-B27 + are promising options for the near future. However, for optimal prevention of formation of syndesmophytes we need more detailed insight in the pathogenesis of bone formation in axSpA and probably more targeted therapies.

Infliximab prevents systemic bone loss and suppresses tendon inflammation in a collagen-induced arthritis rat model

Reduced Bone Mineral Density (BMD) and tendon abnormalities, such as tenosynovitis and enthesitis, are prevalent comorbidities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of chronic treatment with infliximab on BMD and tendon inflammation in an animal model of inflammatory arthritis. Collagen-Induced Arthritis (CIA) was induced in rats, followed by long-term intraperitoneal administration of infliximab. Two additional groups of animals received methotrexate either as a monotherapy or as a co-treatment to infliximab. BMD was evaluated by Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT) and bone histological examination. Tendon inflammation was assessed histologically and by quantitative ELISA analysis of pro-inflammatory cytokines in tendon tissues. Both methotrexate and infliximab treatment alleviated joint inflammation and reduced paw edema. Infliximab-treated animals exhibited an improved trabecular microarchitecture on micro-CT and histological analysis compared to both non-treated and methotrexate-treated animals. Infliximab almost reversed the pathological changes in tendons induced by CIA. Finally, we observed statistically significant declines in tendon TNF-a and IL-23 levels after infliximab treatment. Our study provides evidence that infliximab prevents arthritis-related osteoporosis and suppresses tendon inflammation in an animal model of inflammatory arthritis, in addition to controlling disease activity. These findings offer perspectives for the management of osteoporosis and enthesitis in RA.

Osteoimmunological insights into the pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is inflammatory arthritis predominantly affecting the spine, which is involved in the disorders of both immune and skeletal systems. The exact pathogenesis of AS is not fully understood. Osteoimmunology is a new subject of study in inflammatory arthritis, in particular the pathogenic events involved in the cross-regulation of both skeletal and immune systems. In this review, we discuss osteoimmunological and pathological changes of AS in the spine that are characterized by altered osteogenesis and osteolytic bone destruction, accompanied by the changes of the immune system. It was revealed that bone cells like mesenchymal stem cells, osteoblast, and osteoclast in crossing talking with immune cells such as T cells, B cells coregulate to the pathogenesis of AS. Further, an array of cytokines and molecules expressed by both skeletal and immune systems contribute to these complex interplays. Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of AS will lay a foundation for the exploration of the potential new treatment to AS.

Prevalence and factors associated with osteoporosis and bone mineral density testing in psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To determine bone mineral density (BMD) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients, factors associated with undergoing BMD testing, and the effect of PsA clinical activity on BMD.

METHODS

Patients attending the University of Toronto PsA Clinic with a BMD from cohort inception to January 2019 were included. Descriptive statistics summarized lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip T-scores. Cox proportional hazard regression identified predictors for BMD testing. Logistic regression analysis determined odds of having normal (T-score ≥ -1.0) versus osteoporotic range BMD (T-score ≤ -2.5). A multi-state model determined factors associated with BMD state changes over time.

RESULTS

Of the 1479 patients, 214 had BMDs. Mean T-scores at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip were -0.30±0.32, -1.10±1.04 and -0.45±0.42 respectively. Osteopenia and osteoporosis occurred in 45.27% and 12.94% of patients. Increasing age, menopause, elevated acute phase reactants, biologic, methotrexate and systemic glucocorticoid use were associated with a higher chance of undergoing BMD testing. Increased BMI and biologic use were associated with a lower chance of having osteoporotic range BMD. In multi-state analysis, polyarthritis may portend lower BMDs over time, although this did not achieve statistical significance due to low patient numbers.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in the PsA cohort were similar to the general population. Clinicians are using osteoporosis risk factors and PsA disease severity markers to select patients for BMD testing. Polyarticular disease may portend worse BMDs. Biologic use and increased BMI appear to have a protective effect.

Loss and gain of bone in spondyloarthritis: what drives these opposing clinical features?

The breadth of bone lesion types seen in spondyloarthritis is unprecedented in medicine and includes increased bone turnover, bone loss and fragility, osteitis, osteolysis and erosion, osteosclerosis, osteoproliferation of soft tissues adjacent to bone and spinal skeletal structure weakness. Remarkably, these effects can be present simultaneously in the same patient. The search for a potential unifying cause of effects on the skeleton necessarily focuses on inflammation arising from the dysregulation of immune response to microorganisms, particularly dysregulation of T_H17 lymphocytes, and the dysbiosis of established gut and other microbiota. The compelling notion that a common antecedent pathological mechanism affects existing bone and tissues with bone-forming potential (entheses), simultaneously with variable effect in the former but bone-forming in the latter, drives basic research forward and focuses our awareness on the effects on these bone mechanisms of the increasing portfolio of targeted immunotherapies used in the clinic.

Bone mineral density improves during 2 years of treatment with bisphosphonates in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Aims

To evaluate whether 2 years of treatment with bisphosphonates in combination with calcium/vitamin D supplements has an effect on lumbar spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients starting tumour necrosis factor‐α inhibitors or receiving conventional treatment. Secondly, to explore the development of radiographic vertebral fractures.

Methods

Patients from the Groningen Leeuwarden AS cohort receiving bisphosphonates based on clinical indication and available 2‐year follow‐up BMD measurements were included. BMD of lumbar spine (L1–L4) and hip (total proximal femur) were measured using dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry. Spinal radiographs (Th4–L4) were scored for vertebral fractures according to the Genant method.

Results

In the 20 included patients (median 52 years, 14 males), lumbar spine and hip BMD Z‐scores increased significantly; median from −1.5 (interquartile range [IQR] −2.2 to 0.4) to 0.1 (IQR −1.5 to 1.0); P < .001 and median from −1.0 (IQR −1.6 to −0.7) to −0.8 (IQR −1.2 to 0.0); P = .006 over 2 years, respectively. In patients also treated with tumour necrosis factor‐α inhibitors (n = 11), lumbar spine and hip BMD increased significantly (median 2‐year change +8.6% [IQR 2.4 to 19.6; P = .009] and +3.6% [IQR 0.7–9.0; P = .007]). In patients on conventional treatment (n = 9), lumbar spine BMD increased significantly (median 2‐year change +3.6%; IQR 0.7 to 9.0; P = .011) and no improvement was seen in hip BMD (median −0.6%; IQR −3.1 to 5.1; P = .61). Overall, younger AS males with limited spinal radiographic damage showed most improvement in lumbar spine BMD. Four mild radiographic vertebral fractures developed in 3 patients and 1 fracture increased from mild to moderate over 2 years in postmenopausal women and middle‐aged men.

Conclusion

This explorative observational cohort study in AS showed that 2 years of treatment with bisphosphonates in combination with calcium/vitamin D supplements significantly improves lumbar spine BMD. Mild radiographic vertebral fractures still occurred.

Results of advanced core decompression in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head depending on age and sex-a prospective cohort study

Background

Core decompression is a common surgical technique to treat osteonecrosis of the femoral head. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the parameters “age” and “sex” on the outcome of this type of treatment.

Methods

A prospective cohort study was performed. Eighty-six osteonecrotic hips with a mean follow-up of 32.5 months (± 24.8) after advanced core decompression were analysed regarding age- and sex-dependent treatment failure. Additionally, the modified Harris Hip Score and Numeric Rating Scale were compared regarding the parameters age and sex.

Results

The mean hip survival of the male participants was 51.3 months (39.4% treatment failure), whereas females presented a longer, thus not significant, mean survival of 61.4 months (30% therapy failure; p = 0.48). The further evaluation revealed significantly better survival in the patients aged < 40 years (mean survival 66.09 months, 16% treatment failure) in comparison to those aged ≥ 40 years (mean survival 50.14 months, 46% therapy failure; p = 0.03). The modified Harris Hip Score and Numeric Rating Scale results of patients whose treatment did not fail during the study period were similar, irrespective of the patient’s sex or age.

Conclusions

The study shows that the number of therapy failures is significantly higher in older patients, with 40 years of age marking the borderline. Patients’ sex does not seem to affect the outcome of treatment, and postoperative clinical scores appear to be identical with individuals not affected by therapy failure. Since age and sex are unalterable parameters, the study helps to provide valuable predictions regarding the chances of long-term hip survival after treatment of osteonecrosis.

Cytokines and Bone: Osteoimmunology

Cytokines and hematopoietic growth factors have traditionally been thought of as regulators of the development and function of immune and blood cells. However, an ever-expanding number of these factors have been discovered to have major effects on bone cells and the development of the skeleton in health and disease (Table 1). In addition, several cytokines have been directly linked to the development of osteoporosis in both animal models and in patients. In order to understand the mechanisms regulating bone cells and how this may be dysregulated in disease states, it is necessary to appreciate the diverse effects that cytokines and inflammation have on osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and bone mass. This chapter provides a broad overview of this topic with extensive references so that, if desired, readers can access specific references to delve into individual topics in greater detail.

Baseline MRI inflammation is not a determinant of 5-year bone mineral density loss in patients with early spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of baseline inflammation on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) on the change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) over 5 years in patients with early spondyloarthritis (SpA).

METHODS

From the patients of the DESIR cohort (an early axial SpA cohort), patients with BMD data at both baseline and 5 years, and baseline spine and sacroiliac joints MRI were included. Inflammation was assessed with the SpondyloArthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) spine score. Significant BMD loss was defined by a change of >0.03g/cm². No patients had received TNF blockers before inclusion in the cohort. Univariate and multivariable prognostic analyses were performed. An inverse propensity score weighting method was used to handle confounders.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-three patients were included (mean age 33.9±8.7 years, 58.5% men). A significant bone loss was reported in 51% (n=92) of patients at either lumbar spine or hip. Fourteen (7%) patients had low BMD (Z-score <-2) at the end of the follow-up vs. 28 (15%) at baseline. In multivariable analysis, age was a protective factor of 5 year-BMD loss at any site (OR=0.96, 95% CI [0.93-0.99]). Baseline MRI inflammation has no significant effect on BMD change at any site (OR=0.84, 95% CI [0.46-1.53]).

CONCLUSION

Half of patients with early SpA have a significant bone loss at either lumbar spine or hip over 5 years. Baseline MRI inflammation is not a determinant of this bone loss.

The Effect of TNF Inhibition on Bone Density and Fracture Risk and of IL17 Inhibition on Radiographic Progression and Bone Density in Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis: a Systematic Literature Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Osteoporosis in axial spondyloarthritis may be modified by therapy. The purpose of this systematic review is to describe (i) the effect of TNFi on BMD, (ii) the effect of secukinumab on BMD, and (iii) the effect of secukinumab on radiographic disease progression in axSpA.

RECENT FINDINGS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane using the following retrieval languages: spondyloarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, TNF, IL-17, x-rays, and osteoporosis. Twenty-nine studies were included; 27 re: TNFi and BMD, and 2 re: IL-17 blockers and x-ray progression. TNFi over 2-4 years increased BMD of the lumbar spine (3.2-14.9%) and hip (2.26-4.7%) without reducing vertebral fractures. Secukinumab reduced radiographic progression; none (73%) and minimal (79%) at 4 years. No data on IL-17 blockade and bone were found. TNFi therapy improves bone density but not vertebral fracture rates. Secukinumab improves symptoms and may slow radiographic progression. Data is lacking regarding the effects of secukinumab on BMD and fractures. These are important questions which may impact the choice of therapy.

Monocytes from male patients with ankylosing spondylitis display decreased osteoclastogenesis and decreased RANKL/OPG ratio

The present study investigates the osteoclastogenic capacity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in male patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). We demonstrated that monocytes from these patients display a lower capacity to generate osteoclasts compared to cells from healthy controls, and osteoclastogenesis was negatively correlated with disease duration.

INTRODUCTION

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a disease characterized by new bone growth that leads to syndesmophyte formation but AS patients frequently present with low bone mineral density/fractures. Osteoclastogenesis in AS patients is poorly studied and controversial. The aim of this study is to determine if the osteoclastogenic capacity of PBMCs is different in AS patients compared to controls and the relationship between osteoclastogenesis and clinical/laboratory parameters.

METHODS

PBMCs from 85 male AS patients and 59 controls were tested for CD16+ cells and induced to differentiate into osteoclasts over 3 weeks in vitro. Serum levels of RANKL, osteoprotegerin (OPG), C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX), and amino-terminal pro-peptide of type I collagen (P1NP) were also evaluated.

RESULTS

PBMCs from AS patients had fewer CD16+ cells and produced fewer osteoclasts compared to controls. Apoptosis occurred less frequently in osteoclasts obtained from AS patients than in osteoclasts from the controls. A lower RANKL/OPG and CTX/P1NP were observed in AS patients compared to controls. AS patients taking NSAIDs presented no difference regarding the number of OCs produced and the percentage of CD16+ cells compared to controls. However, patients taking TNF inhibitors (TNFi) presented lower OC numbers than controls. A negative correlation was demonstrated between the number of osteoclasts generated from PBMCs of AS patients and disease duration.

CONCLUSION

Monocytes from male AS patients display a lower capacity to generate osteoclasts in vitro compared to cells from controls. Osteoclastogenesis was negatively correlated with disease duration. This finding supports the idea that osteoclasts play a role in the physiopathology of bone disease in AS patients.

Osteoporosis in psoriatic arthritis: a cross-sectional study of an outpatient clinic population

Background

The risk of osteoporosis in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) still remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip and lumbar spine measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients with PsA.

Methods

From an outpatient clinic in southern Norway, 140 patients with PsA were consecutively recruited and assessed for osteoporosis as part of a prospective study from January 2013 to May 2014. An extensive data collection was performed including demographic data and measures reflecting disease activity and health status.

Results

Mean age was 52.4 years and 71 (50.7%) were women. Median disease duration was 7.8 years. The proportion of patients with low BMD (defined as Z score≤-1.0 SD) was comparable to the expected value of 16%, according to the normal distribution of the Z score in the population. Osteoporosis was only found in 6.4% (95% CI3% to 11%) of the patients. No significant associations were found between BMD and disease activity measures.

Conclusion

The prevalence of PsA patients with osteoporosis or low BMD was low and in the range seen in the reference population. This supports that patients with PsA are not at high risk for osteoporosis compared with the general population. Therefore, clinicians may follow the general population guidelines for monitoring of osteoporosis for patients with PsA.

[Becoming older with axial spondyloarthritis]

The combination of physiological age-related changes (e. g. reduction in muscle mass and function, reduction in organ function and degenerative changes in joints) and disease-specific changes of ankylosing spondylitis (AS), make older AS patients vulnerable for additional diseases. In this patient population various processes lead to a reduction in physical function, changes in posture, osteoporosis and sarcopenia, which then can result in falls and fractures, especially vertebral fractures. Mortality is increased in patients with AS, particularly in men due to an increase in cardiovascular mortality. Although the standardized assessment of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (independent of age) has been recommended for years, it is rarely done in clinical practice. Overall, data on comorbidities and risk factors are only available for AS patients and are lacking for other forms of spondyloarthritides.

Comorbidities in Spondyloarthritis

Comorbidities in spondyloarthritis (SpA) add to the burden of disease by contributing to disease activity, functional and work disability, and mortality. Thus, awareness of comorbidities in SpA is crucial to improve their screening and management and to ultimately improve outcomes in those affected. Osteoporosis has been reported to be the most prevalent comorbidity in SpA, and its risk is increased in these patients, compared with the general population; the risk of vertebral fractures requires further evaluation. Cardiovascular risk is also increased in this population, both due to an increase of the traditional cardiovascular risk factors in these patients, but also due to the presence of inflammation. The role of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in this increased risk needs further elucidation, but there is consensus on the need to encourage smoking cessation and to perform periodic evaluation of cardiovascular risk in these patients, particularly in the case of change in treatment course. Concerning the risk of cancer, no increased risk inherent to SpA seems to exist. However, an increased neoplastic risk can occur due to SpA treatments, e.g., P-UVA. Data are sparse on the risk of infections compared with rheumatoid arthritis, but there appears to be no risk in the absence of TNF-inhibitor exposure. Regardless of which comorbidity, a gap exists between recommendations for their management and actual implementation in clinical practice, suggesting that there is still a need for improvement in this area. Systematic screening for these comorbidities should improve both short- and long-term outcomes in SpA patients.

Inflammatory diseases and bone fragility

Systemic osteoporosis and increased fracture rates have been described in chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, inflammatory bowel diseases, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Most of these patients receive glucocorticoids, which have their own deleterious effects on bone. However, the other main determinant of bone fragility is the inflammation itself, as shown by the interactions between the inflammatory mediators, the actors of the immune system, and the bone remodelling. The inflammatory disease activity is thus on top of the other well-known osteoporotic risk factors in these patients. Optimal control of inflammation is part of the prevention of osteoporosis, and potent anti-inflammatory drugs have positive effects on surrogate markers of bone fragility. More data are needed to assess the anti-fracture efficacy of a tight control of inflammation in patients with a chronic inflammatory disorder. This review aimed at presenting different clinical aspects of inflammatory diseases which illustrate the relationships between inflammation and bone fragility.

Osteoporosis Management in Ankylosing Spondylitis

Low bone mineral density (BMD) is increasingly recognized as a common comorbid condition in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). As low BMD increases fracture risk, it is important to identify and treat low BMD in patients with AS who have been shown to be at increased risk for fractures above the population normal. Since low BMD occurs early in disease, we screen during the first year of diagnosis with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). If patients are found to have osteoporosis by T-score of less than -2.5 or if their Z-score on DXA is more than two standard deviations below the mean, we initiate therapy with bisphosphonates in males and in females who are not planning any future pregnancies. While reduction in fracture risk with bisphosphonate therapy has not been clearly defined in patients with AS, reduction in vertebral and hip fractures has been well established in primary osteoporosis and thus it is our first line treatment. If there are contraindications to the use of bisphosphonates in the treatment of low BMD, we will consider the use of denosumab. If the patient is not receiving a TNF-alpha inhibitor (TNFi) and has active disease, we also favor early initiation of TNFi due to their positive effects on BMD though the outcome on reduction in vertebral fractures remains unclear. We counsel all patients regarding the importance of adequate intake of vitamin D and calcium per the Institute of Medicine guidelines. All patients should be encouraged to participate in weight-bearing activities with a focus on core strength and gait training.

Is there a relation between pre-sarcopenia, sarcopenia, cachexia and osteoporosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis?

Background

Osteoporosis is a well-known complication of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, data about body composition modifications and muscle performance showed conflicting results. The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence and risk factors of pre-sarcopenia, sarcopenia and cachexia in patients with AS and analyze its relationship with bone loss and symptomatic and severity parameters of the disease.

Methods

Sixty-seven consecutive male patients with AS (mean age of 40.9 ± 11.0 years) and 67 healthy controls were studied. Body composition and bone mineral density (BMD) scans were obtained using DXA. The fat-free mass index (FFMI; fat-free mass divided by height squared) and the percent of fat mass (%FM) were calculated. Pre-sarcopenia was defined by low skeletal muscle mass (SMI <7.25 kg/m²), sarcopenia by the combined presence of the two following criteria: SMI <7.25 kg/m² and a low muscle strength (handgrip strength <30 kg) or a low muscle performance (timed get-up-and-go test >10 s) and cachexia by a BMI <20 kg/m² plus 3 from the 5 following parameters: anorexia, fatigue, handgrip strength <30 kg, CRP >5 mg/l, SMI <7.25 kg/m².

Results

Pre-sarcopenia, sarcopenia, cachexia, and osteoporosis prevalences were (50.4, 34.3, 11.9, and 16.0) respectively. Patients had a mean 3 kg significant decrease in FFM and a 1 kg/m² decrease in appendicular mass vs. healthy controls. Pre-sarcopenia, sarcopenia and cachexia were significantly associated to higher BASDAI levels and low BMD.

Conclusion

Our study showed that men with AS had a statistically significant reduction in total and appendicular lean mass that is related to higher disease activity and significantly associated to bone loss.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1155-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Decreased Serotonin Levels and Serotonin-Mediated Osteoblastic Inhibitory Signaling in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis

Evidence suggests that serotonin is an inhibitor of bone formation. We aimed to assess: 1) serum serotonin levels in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), a prototype bone-forming disease, compared with patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and healthy subjects; 2) the effect(s) of TNFα blockers on serum serotonin levels in patients with AS and RA; and 3) the effect(s) of serum of AS patients on serotonin signaling. Serum serotonin levels were measured in 47 patients with AS, 28 patients with RA, and 40 healthy subjects by radioimmunoassay; t test was used to assess differences between groups. The effect of serum on serotonin signaling was assessed using the human osteoblastic cell line Saos2, evaluating levels of phospho-CREB by Western immunoblots. Serotonin serum levels were significantly lower in patients with AS compared with healthy subjects (mean ± SEM ng/mL 122.9 ± 11.6 versus 177.4 ± 24.58, p = 0.038) and patients with RA (mean ± SEM ng/mL 244.8 ± 37.5, p = 0.0004). Patients with AS receiving TNFα blockers had significantly lower serotonin levels compared with patients with AS not on such treatment (mean ± SEM ng/mL 95.8 ± 14.9 versus 149.2 ± 16.0, p = 0.019). Serotonin serum levels were inversely correlated with pCREB induction in osteoblast-like Saos-2 cells. Serotonin levels are low in patients with AS and decrease even further during anti-TNFα treatment. Differences in serotonin levels are shown to have a functional impact on osteoblast-like Saos-2 cells. Therefore, serotonin may be involved in new bone formation in AS.

Risk factors for osteoporosis in inflammatory bowel disease patients

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients exhibit higher risk for bone loss than the general population. The chronic inflammation causes a reduction in bone mineral density (BMD), which leads to osteopenia and osteoporosis. This article reviewed each risk factor for osteoporosis in IBD patients. Inflammation is one of the factors that contribute to osteoporosis in IBD patients, and the main system that is involved in bone loss is likely RANK/RANKL/osteoprotegerin. Smoking is a risk factor for bone loss and fractures, and many mechanisms have been proposed to explain this loss. Body composition also interferes in bone metabolism and increasing muscle mass may positively affect BMD. IBD patients frequently use corticosteroids, which stimulates osteoclastogenesis. IBD patients are also associated with vitamin D deficiency, which contributes to bone loss. However, infliximab therapy is associated with improvements in bone metabolism, but it is not clear whether the effects are because of inflammation improvement or infliximab use. Ulcerative colitis patients with proctocolectomy and ileal pouches and Crohn’s disease patients with ostomy are also at risk for bone loss, and these patients should be closely monitored.

Bone loss in patients with early inflammatory back pain suggestive of spondyloarthritis: results from the prospective DESIR cohort

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the study were to assess the 2 year BMD changes and their determinants in patients with early inflammatory back pain suggestive of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) (DESIR cohort).

METHODS

A total of 265 patients (54% male, mean age 34.4 years) had BMD measurements at baseline and at 2 years. Low BMD was defined as a Z score ≤-2 (at at least one site) and significant bone loss was defined by a decrease in BMD ≥0.03 g/cm(2). Clinical, biological and imaging parameters were assessed over 2 years.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients (14.7%) had low BMD at baseline; 112 patients (42.3%) had a 2 year significant bone loss. One hundred and eighty-seven (70.6%) used NSAIDs at baseline and 89 (33.6%) received anti-TNF therapy over 2 years. In anti-TNF users, BMD significantly increased at the lumbar spine and did not change at the hip site from baseline. In multivariate analysis, baseline use of NSAIDs [odds ratio (OR) 0.38, P = 0.006] had a protective effect on hip bone loss. In patients without anti-TNF treatments, baseline use of NSAIDs (OR 0.09, P = 0.006) and a 2 year increase in BMI (OR 0.55, P = 0.003) had protective effects on hip bone loss, whereas a 2 year increase in fat mass was associated with hip bone loss (OR 1.18, P = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with symptoms suggestive of early axial SpA, 42.3% of patients have significant bone loss over 2 years. Anti-TNF therapy is protective against bone loss and baseline use of NSAIDs has a protective effect on hip bone loss.

Loss of Bone and Wnt10b Expression in Male Type 1 Diabetic Mice Is Blocked by the Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri

Type 1 diabetes (T1D)-induced osteoporosis is characterized by a predominant suppression of osteoblast number and activity, as well as increased bone marrow adiposity but no change in osteoclast activity. The fundamental mechanisms and alternative anabolic treatments (with few side effects) for T1D bone loss remain undetermined. Recent studies by our laboratory and others indicate that probiotics can benefit bone health. Here, we demonstrate that Lactobacillus reuteri, a probiotic with anti-inflammatory and bone health properties, prevents T1D-induced bone loss and marrow adiposity in mice. We further found that L. reuteri treatment prevented the suppression of Wnt10b in T1D bone. Consistent with a role for attenuated bone Wnt10b expression in T1D osteoporosis, we observed that bone-specific Wnt10b transgenic mice are protected from T1D bone loss. To examine the mechanisms of this protection, we focused on TNF-α, a cytokine up-regulated in T1D that causes suppression of osteoblast Wnt10b expression in vitro. Addition of L. reuteri prevented TNF-α-mediated suppression of Wnt10b and osteoblast maturation markers. Taken together, our findings reveal a mechanism by which T1D causes bone loss and open new avenues for use of probiotics to benefit the bone.

Inflammation, bone loss and fracture risk in spondyloarthritis

Osteoporosis (ie, low bone mineral density) is common in ankylosing spondylitis, related to both systemic inflammation and decreased mobility. Vertebral fracture risk is increased; acute back pain in these patients is not always a flare-up of the disease, as it can be related to bone complications. Intervertebral disc fractures in the ankylosed spine are associated with severe neurological complications. As expected from pathophysiology, treatments effective against inflammation have a positive effect on bone, and prospective open studies have shown that tumour-necrosis-factor blockers can improve bone mineral density at the spine and the hip. There is so far no evidence of a decreased risk of fractures with such treatment.

Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy Increased Spine and Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density of Patients with Active Ankylosing Spondylitis with Low Bone Mineral Density

Objective.

To evaluate the effect of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy on bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with low BMD.

Methods.

Eighty-nine patients with active AS with low BMD were randomly divided into either a study group or a control group. The study group received etanercept (50 mg/week) or adalimumab (40 mg/2 week) subcutaneously for 1 year. BMD of lumbar spine and femoral neck was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, and bone turnover markers serum C telopeptide of type-I collagen (sCTX) and serum procollagen type-I N propeptide (PINP) were detected by ELISA at baseline and at end of study.

Results.

After 1 year, compared with baseline, there was a significant increase in spine and femoral neck BMD by a mean ± SD of 14.9% ± 15.6% (p < 0.0001) and 4.7% ± 7.9% (p < 0.0001) in the study group. In the control group, there was a significant decrease in spine and femoral neck BMD by a mean ± SD of −8.6% ± 9.7% (p < 0.0001) and −9.8% ± 11.5% (p < 0.0001). Compared with baseline, sCTX was significantly decreased in the study group (−40% at 1 yr, p < 0.0001), but bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and PINP increased (45.6%, p < 0.0001 and 30.8%, p < 0.0001, respectively).

Conclusion.

In patients with active AS with low BMD, the spine and femoral neck BMD increased after anti-TNF therapy for 1 year, and it was accompanied by a significant decrease in bone resorption markers and an increase in bone formation markers.

Clinical studies on bone-related outcome and the effect of TNF-α blocking therapy in ankylosing spondylitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview of clinical trials and observational studies investigating the effect of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) blocking therapy on bone formation and bone loss in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

RECENT FINDINGS

The effect of TNF-α blocking therapy on excessive bone formation or osteoproliferation remains inconclusive. Radiographic assessment of spinal osteoproliferation is complicated by the overall slow rate of progression and the high variability between individual AS patients. Multiple studies demonstrated that TNF-α blocking therapy results in a significant increase in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and hip. Based on bone turnover marker (BTM) analysis, this can mainly be explained by an increase in mineralization and decrease in bone resorption.

SUMMARY

Both osteoproliferation (e.g. syndesmophytes and ankylosis of vertebrae) and excessive bone loss resulting in osteoporosis and vertebral fractures are frequently present in AS. Previous studies showed that BMD increases during TNF-α blocking therapy. Long-term follow-up in a large cohort of patients is needed to investigate whether TNF-α blockers can consolidate or stop spinal osteoproliferation and prevent vertebral fractures. Future studies should focus on the effect of these agents on bone-related outcome in AS patients with early vs. advanced disease.

Effect of TNF-alpha inhibitor treatment on bone mineral density in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and fractures. TNF inhibitors have been used to treat AS, but their effect on bone is unclear. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to study the effect of TNF inhibitors on spine and hip BMD in patients with AS.

METHODS

Two authors independently searched MEDLINE and PubMed for longitudinal studies that had assessed the effect of TNF inhibitors on BMD in patients with AS. Studies with a minimum follow-up period of 1 year were included.

RESULTS

Seven longitudinal studies and one randomized control trial were included, with a total of 568 AS patients (mean age range of 36-48 years and disease duration of 9-17 years). Lumbar spine BMD increased by 5.1% (95% CI: 4.0-6.1%, p = 0.00000) after 1 year of treatment with TNF inhibitors and by 8.6% (95% CI: 6.8-10.3%, p < 0.00001) after 2 years. Significant improvements in total hip BMD were also noted after 1 [1.8% (1.0-2.5%)] and 2 years [2.5% (1.9-3.0%)]. Compared to baseline, femoral neck BMD remained stable after 1 year [0.7% (-0.8% to 2.2%), p = 0.34]. No significant heterogeneity was noted amongst the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

TNF inhibitors can increase lumbar spine and total hip BMD and maintain femoral neck BMD for up to 2 years in patients with AS. More research is needed to assess the effect of TNF inhibitors on bone quality and fracture risk.