Complex repetitive discharge on electromyography as a risk factor for malignancy in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence and clinical characteristics of dysphagia in patients with dermatomyositis

BACKGROUND

Dermatomyositis (DM) is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by distinctive skin rash, muscle inflammation with symmetrical and progressive muscle weakness, and elevated serum levels of muscle-associated enzymes. DM may affect skeletal muscles involved in swallowing, leading to dysphagia, which can negatively impact individual's physical and psychosocial well-being. Despite this, dysphagia in patients with DM remains poorly understood. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prevalence and clinical features of dysphagia in patients with DM and juvenile DM (JDM).

METHODS

Four electronic databases were systematically searched until September 2022. Studies with patients with DM or JDM and dysphagia were included. The pooled prevalence of all included studies was calculated, and the clinical characteristics of dysphagia were qualitatively analyzed.

KEY RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies with 3335 patients were included. The overall pooled prevalence of dysphagia was 32.3% (95% CI: 0.270, 0.373) in patients with DM and 37.7% (95% CI: -0.031, 0.785) in patients with JDM. Subgroup analyses revealed that Sweden had the highest prevalence (66.7% [95% CI: 0.289, 1.044]), whereas Tunisia had the lowest prevalence (14.3% [95% CI: -0.040, 0.326]). Moreover, South America had the highest prevalence (47.0% [95% CI: 0.401, 0.538]), whereas Africa had the lowest prevalence (14.3% [95% CI: -0.040, 0.326]). Dysphagia in patients with DM and JDM was characterized by both oropharyngeal and esophageal dysfunctions, with predominant difficulties in motility.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Our findings showed that dysphagia affects one in three patients with DM or JDM. However, the documentation on the diagnosis and management of dysphagia in the literature is inadequate. Our results highlighted the need to use both clinical and instrumental assessments to evaluate swallowing function in this population.

Cancer and myositis: Who, when, and how to screen

Cancer screening in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) is essential because an increased risk of cancer in IIMs has been well demonstrated. However, a consensus regarding cancer screening approaches is lacking. Therefore, the approach presented in this review reflects available evidence and our clinical experiences. Patients with IIMs should be evaluated for 3 distinct types of risk categories: (a) clinical with their history, physical examination, and laboratory parameters; (b) based on IIMs subtypes; and (c) based on serology - myositis specific and associated autoantibodies. Further, according to these characteristics, patients should be classified as low risk, moderate risk, and high risk for cancer. In our approach, all patients with IIM within 3 years of disease onset should undertake cancer screening according to their risk stratification. First, irrespective of risk, all patients should undergo age and gender-appropriate screening as per local guidelines. Patients at low-risk stratification should undertake basic cancer screening with routine blood counts, labs, and imaging; at moderate-risk stratification, patients should undertake enhanced cancer screening including CT chest; and at high-risk stratification, patients should undertake comprehensive cancer screening including PET/CT at baseline. Consensus guidelines among all major stakeholders, including rheumatologists, neurologists, dermatologists, and oncologists representing different parts of the world, establishing uniform cancer screening approaches in patients with IIM, are the need of the hour.

A systematic review and meta-analysis to inform cancer screening guidelines in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Objectives

To identify clinical factors associated with cancer risk in the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) and to systematically review the existing evidence related to cancer screening.

Methods

A systematic literature search was carried out on Medline, Embase and Scopus. Cancer risk within the IIM population (i.e. not compared with the general population) was expressed as risk ratios (RR) for binary variables and weighted mean differences (WMD) for continuous variables. Evidence relating to cancer screening practices in the IIMs were synthesized via narrative review.

Results

Sixty-nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. DM subtype (RR 2.21), older age (WMD 11.19), male sex (RR 1.53), dysphagia (RR 2.09), cutaneous ulceration (RR 2.73) and anti-transcriptional intermediary factor-1 gamma positivity (RR 4.66) were identified as being associated with significantly increased risk of cancer. PM (RR 0.49) and clinically amyopathic DM (RR 0.44) subtypes, Raynaud’s phenomenon (RR 0.61), interstitial lung disease (RR 0.49), very high serum creatine kinase (WMD −1189.96) or lactate dehydrogenase (WMD −336.52) levels, and anti-Jo1 (RR 0.45) or anti-EJ (RR 0.17) positivity were identified as being associated with significantly reduced risk of cancer. Nine studies relating to IIM-specific cancer screening were included. CT scanning of the thorax, abdomen and pelvis appeared to be effective in identifying underlying asymptomatic cancers.

Conclusion

Cancer risk factors should be evaluated in patients with IIM for risk stratification. Screening evidence is limited but CT scanning could be useful. Prospective studies and consensus guidelines are needed to establish cancer screening strategies in IIM patients.

The Brazilian Society of Rheumatology recommendations on investigation and diagnosis of systemic autoimmune myopathies

BACKGROUND

This research is recommended by the Myopathy Committee of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology for the investigation and diagnosis of systemic autoimmune myopathies. BODY: A systematic literature review was performed in the Embase, Medline (PubMed) and Cochrane databases, including studies published until October 2018. PRISMA was used for the review, and the articles were evaluated, based on the Oxford levels of evidence. Ten recommendations were developed addressing different aspects of systemic autoimmune myopathy investigation and diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The European League Against Rheumatism/ American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) classification stands out for the diagnosis of systemic autoimmune myopathies. Muscular biopsy is essential, aided by muscular magnetic resonance images and electroneuromyography in complementary research. Analysis of the factors related to prognosis with the evaluation of extramuscular manifestations, and comorbidities and intense investigation regarding differential diagnoses are mandatory.

Autoimmune Myopathies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article provides guidelines for diagnosing and treating the different subtypes of autoimmune myopathies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most common subtypes of autoimmune myopathies are dermatomyositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, antisynthetase syndrome, and overlap syndromes; isolated polymyositis is an exceptionally rare disease. Specific autoantibodies are associated with unique clinical phenotypes and may be used for diagnostic and prognostic purposes, such as to assess the risk of coexisting malignancy.

SUMMARY

Diagnosing the specific subtype of autoimmune myopathy can be achieved by combining relevant features of the history, neuromuscular examination, muscle biopsy, and serologic studies.