HFA-PEFF scores: prognostic value in heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

Heart Failure score and outcomes in patients with preserved ejection fraction after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

AIMS

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently associated with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but the diagnosis and prediction of the outcomes of HFpEF are difficult. Notably, the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology proposed the use of the HFA-PEFF score in the diagnosis of HFpEF. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of the pre- and post-procedural HFA-PEFF scores in patients with preserved ejection fraction (EF) after catheter ablation (CA) for AF. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac hospitalization for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoint was AF recurrence.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Overall, 354 patients with AF and preserved EF who underwent CA as well as blood tests and transthoracic echocardiography 2 weeks before and 6 months after CA from January 2018 to December 2019 were retrospectively enrolled in the study. In the 354 participants, univariate analysis showed that the post-procedural HFA-PEFF score was associated with a 3-year risk of the primary endpoint (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.07-6.73; P < 0.001), whereas the pre-procedural HFA-PEFF score was not (HR = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.82-1.86, P = 0.307). Further, the association between the post-procedural HFA-PEFF score and primary endpoint was not modified even after including other relevant variables into the score. Similar to the primary endpoint, the post-procedural HFA-PEFF score was associated with the 3-year risk of AF recurrence (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with preserved EF undergoing AF ablation, the HFA-PEFF score at 6 months after CA was associated with the primary endpoint and AF recurrence at the 3-year follow-up.

Left ventricular diastolic function in atrial fibrillation: Methodological implications and clinical considerations

The assessment of LVDD is routinely included in echocardiographic evaluation because it correlates with cardiac disease progression and its prognostic value. Classic parameters used for assessing LV diastolic function correlate well with invasive measurements which remains the gold standard. Nevertheless, no one echocardiographic parameter alone can completely evaluate LVDD. LV diastolic function evaluation in atrial fibrillation is still challenging, since the E/A ratio, one of the most used parameters in echocardiographic evaluation, cannot be feasible. This is not a good reason to give up measurement. In this review, we analyze the different methods for estimating LV diastolic function in atrial fibrillation, including measurement not dependent on atrial systole and some novel methods that are promising, but not ever available during clinical practice highlighting that this assessment is mandatory for a complete clinical evaluation of the patients.

Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction With CKD: A Narrative Review of a Multispecialty Disorder

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogenous syndrome with varying phenotypic expression. The phenotype chronic kidney disease (CKD) associated HFpEF is increasing in prevalence globally and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality compared to other HFpEF variants. These 2 conditions share common risk factors, including obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome, as well as similar pathophysiology, including systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, elevated neurohormones, mineralocorticoid-receptor activation, and venous congestion. Given the coexistence of CKD and HFpEF, the diagnosis of HFpEF can be difficult. Moreover, treatment options for HFpEF have remained limited despite the success seen in its counterpart, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. HFpEF encompasses complex multisystem pathophysiological perturbations beyond neurohormones, it is unlikely that a single agent can have significant benefit in this population. Recent data on sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in HFpEF and CKD, and on glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists and mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists in metabolic syndrome, which target multiple pathways simultaneously, have led to promising therapeutics for HFpEF and CKD. In this perspective, our goal is to increase awareness of HFpEF as a multisystem disorder that shares the same disease processes seen in CKD and to emphasize that its management in individuals with CKD warrants a collective and multidisciplinary approach.

Summary and Comparison of the 2022 ACC/AHA/HFSA and 2021 ESC Heart Failure Guidelines

The guidelines released by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Failure Society of America (ACC/AHA/HFSA) in 2022 and those released in 2021 by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) play a crucial role in offering evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of heart failure (HF). This comprehensive review aims to provide an overview of these guidelines, incorporating insights from relevant clinical trials. While there is considerable alignment between the two sets of guidelines, certain notable differences arise due to variations in publication timelines, which we will outline. By presenting this summary, our objective is to empower clinicians to make informed decisions regarding HF management in their own practice, and facilitate the development of more harmonized guidelines in the future.

Combining three independent pathological stressors induces a heart failure with preserved ejection fraction phenotype

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is defined as HF with an ejection fraction (EF) ≥ 50% and elevated cardiac diastolic filling pressures. The underlying causes of HFpEF are multifactorial and not well-defined. A transgenic mouse with low levels of cardiomyocyte (CM)-specific inducible Cavβ2a expression (β2a-Tg mice) showed increased cytosolic CM Ca2+, and modest levels of CM hypertrophy, and fibrosis. This study aimed to determine if β2a-Tg mice develop an HFpEF phenotype when challenged with two additional stressors, high-fat diet (HFD) and Nω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME, LN). Four-month-old wild-type (WT) and β2a-Tg mice were given either normal chow (WT-N, β2a-N) or HFD and/or l-NAME (WT-HFD, WT-LN, WT-HFD-LN, β2a-HFD, β2a-LN, and β2a-HFD-LN). Some animals were treated with the histone deacetylase (HDAC) (hypertrophy regulators) inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) (β2a-HFD-LN-SAHA). Echocardiography was performed monthly. After 4 mo of treatment, terminal studies were performed including invasive hemodynamics and organs weight measurements. Cardiac tissue was collected. Four months of HFD plus l-NAME treatment did not induce a profound HFpEF phenotype in FVB WT mice. β2a-HFD-LN (3-Hit) mice developed features of HFpEF, including increased atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) levels, preserved EF, diastolic dysfunction, robust CM hypertrophy, increased M2-macrophage population, and myocardial fibrosis. SAHA reduced the HFpEF phenotype in the 3-Hit mouse model, by attenuating these effects. The 3-Hit mouse model induced a reliable HFpEF phenotype with CM hypertrophy, cardiac fibrosis, and increased M2-macrophage population. This model could be used for identifying and preclinical testing of novel therapeutic strategies.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our study shows that three independent pathological stressors (increased Ca2+ influx, high-fat diet, and l-NAME) together produce a profound HFpEF phenotype. The primary mechanisms include HDAC-dependent-CM hypertrophy, necrosis, increased M2-macrophage population, fibroblast activation, and myocardial fibrosis. A role for HDAC activation in the HFpEF phenotype was shown in studies with SAHA treatment, which prevented the severe HFpEF phenotype. This "3-Hit" mouse model could be helpful in identifying novel therapeutic strategies to treat HFpEF.

Discriminative Role of Invasive Left Heart Catheterization in Patients Suspected of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Background Recently, diastolic stress testing and invasive hemodynamic measurements have been emphasized for diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) because when determined using noninvasive parameters it can fall into a nondiagnostic intermediate range. The current study evaluated the discriminative and prognostic roles of invasive measured left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in the population with suspected HFpEF, particularly for patients with intermediate Heart Failure Association Pre-test Assessment, Echocardiography & Natriuretic Peptide, Functional Testing, Final Etiology (HFA-PEFF) score. Methods and Results A total of 404 patients with symptoms or signs of HF and preserved left ventricular systolic function were enrolled. All subjects underwent left heart catheterization with left ventricular end-diastolic pressure measurement for confirmation of HFpEF (≥16 mm Hg). The primary outcome was all-cause death or readmission due to HF within 10 years. Among the study population, 324 patients (80.2%) were diagnosed as invasively confirmed HFpEF, and 80 patients (19.8%) were as noncardiac dyspnea. The patients with HFpEF showed a significantly higher HFA-PEFF score than the patients with noncardiac dyspnea (3.8±1.8 versus 2.6±1.5, P<0.001). The discriminative ability of the HFA-PEFF score for diagnosing HFpEF was modest (area under the curve, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.64-0.75], P<0.001). The HFA-PEFF score was associated with a significantly higher 10-year risk of death or HF readmission (per-1 increase, hazard ratio [HR], 1.603 [95% CI, 1.376-1.868], P<0.001). Among the 226 patients with an intermediate HFA-PEFF score (2-4), those with invasively confirmed HFpEF had a significantly higher risk of death or HF readmission within 10 years than the patients with noncardiac dyspnea (24.0% versus 6.9%, HR, 3.327 [95% CI, 1.109-16.280], P=0.030). Conclusions The HFA-PEFF score is a moderately useful tool for predicting future adverse events in suspected HFpEF, and invasively measured left ventricular end-diastolic pressure can provide additional information to discriminate patient prognosis, particularly in those with intermediate HFA-PEFF scores. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04505449.

Obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges

The prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has increased in recent decades. In particular, obesity-related HFpEF is a distinct and frequently encountered phenotype; however, its diagnosis is complex. Furthermore, the management of obesity-related HFpEF has not been established despite the introduction of promising drugs. This review summarizes the diagnostic challenges, pathophysiology, and therapeutic options for obesity-related HFpEF.

Risk Prediction Models and Novel Prognostic Factors for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic and Comprehensive Review

BACKGROUND

Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have large individual differences, unclear risk stratification, and imperfect treatment plans. Risk prediction models are helpful for the dynamic assessment of patients' prognostic risk and early intensive therapy of high-risk patients. The purpose of this study is to systematically summarize the existing risk prediction models and novel prognostic factors for HFpEF, to provide a reference for the construction of convenient and efficient HFpEF risk prediction models.

METHODS

Studies on risk prediction models and prognostic factors for HFpEF were systematically searched in relevant databases including PubMed and Embase. The retrieval time was from inception to February 1, 2023. The Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool was used to assess the risk of bias in included studies. The predictive value of risk prediction models for end outcomes was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, the area under the curve, C-statistic, C-index, etc. In the literature screening process, potential novel prognostic factors with high value were explored.

RESULTS

A total of 21 eligible HFpEF risk prediction models and 22 relevant studies were included. Except for 2 studies with a high risk of bias and 2 studies with a moderate risk of bias, other studies that proposed risk prediction models had a low risk of bias overall. Potential novel prognostic factors for HFpEF were classified and described in terms of demographic characteristics (age, sex, and race), lifestyle (physical activity, body mass index, weight change, and smoking history), laboratory tests (biomarkers), physical inspection (blood pressure, electrocardiogram, imaging examination), and comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

It is of great significance to explore the potential novel prognostic factors of HFpEF and build a more convenient and efficient risk prediction model for improving the overall prognosis of patients. This review can provide a substantial reference for further research.

Evaluation of the HFA-PEFF Score: results from the prospective DIAST-CHF cohort

AIMS

Although the number of patients suffering from heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) increases, the routine diagnosis remains a challenge. In the absence of a pathognomonic sign for HFpEF or specific treatment strategies, a prognosis-based characterization of suspected patients remains promising for both the risk stratification of the patients and a disease definition. The Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology has introduced an algorithm with different levels of likelihood regarding the diagnosis of HFpEF, the HFA-PEFF score. We aimed to evaluate the predictive value of this algorithm in a large cohort regarding mortality, symptom burden, and the functional status.

METHODS AND RESULTS

DIAST-CHF is a multicentre, population-based, prospective, observational study in subjects with at least one risk factor for HFpEF between the age of 50 and 85. We calculated the HFA-PEFF score (n = 1668) and analysed the risk groups for overall mortality, cardiovascular hospitalization, and submaximal functional capacity (6-min walk distance) at baseline and after a follow-up period of 10 years. Patients with high HFA-PEFF score values 5&6 showed a higher mortality than those with an intermediate score (score values 2-4) and low score values (high 21.3% vs. intermediate 10.1% vs. low 4.3%, P < 0.001). Also, the burden of MACE (death, cardiovascular hospitalization, new myocardial infarction, first diagnosis of HF) was increased in the high score values group (high 40.7% vs. intermediate 25.9% vs. low 13.9%, P < 0.001). Similarly, patients with higher scores had higher cumulative incidences of cardiovascular hospitalizations (P = 0.011). Subjects with higher scores also had lower 6-min walk distance both at baseline and during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The HFA-PEFF score provides a reliable instrument to stratify suspected HFpEF patients by their risk for mortality, symptom burden, and functional status in cohort at risk with a follow-up period of 10 years. As high HFA-PEFF scores are associated with worse outcome, the HFA-PEFF algorithm describes a defining approach towards HFpEF.

Genomic, Proteomic, and Metabolic Comparisons of Small Animal Models of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Tale of Mice, Rats, and Cats

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a medical anomaly that baffles researchers and physicians alike. The overall phenotypical changes of diastolic function and left ventricular hypertrophy observed in HFpEF are definable; however, the metabolic and molecular alterations that ultimately produce these changes are not well established. Comorbidities such as obesity, hypertension, and diabetes, as well as general aging, play crucial roles in its development and progression. Various animal models have recently been developed to better understand the pathophysiological and metabolic developments in HFpEF and to illuminate novel avenues for pharmacotherapy. These models include multi‐hit rodents and feline aortic constriction animals. Recently, genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approaches have been used to define altered signaling pathways in the heart associated with HFpEF, including those involved in inflammation, cGMP‐related, Ca²⁺ handling, mitochondrial respiration, and the unfolded protein response in endoplasmic reticulum stress. This article aims to present an overview of what has been learnt by these studies, focusing mainly on the findings in common while highlighting unresolved issues. The knowledge gained from these research models will not simply be of benefit for treating HFpEF but will undoubtedly provide new insights into the mechanisms by which the heart deals with external stresses and how the processes involved can fail.