The Three Rs for Preventing Heart Failure Readmission: Review, Reassess, and Reeducate

Knowing the Patient: Understanding Readmission Reasons in Complex Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is a complex problem characterized by frequent hospitalizations and high 30-day readmission rates. Researchers studying HF readmission report that patients and clinicians have different perspectives on readmission and preventability when unadjusted for disease severity.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to gather patient, caregiver, nurse, and physician subjective reason(s) for 30-day HF readmission and perceptions of preventability with contextual factors to evaluate differences.

METHODS

A convergent, parallel, mixed-methods design was used with interviews and chart reviews to evaluate contextual factors from the current and index hospital stay. Adults readmitted within 30 days of a previous inpatient stay with a coded HF diagnosis were enrolled and interviewed, followed by interviews with associated caregivers, attending physicians, and assigned nurses.

RESULTS

Interviews were conducted with patients (n = 44), caregivers (n = 6), physicians (n = 24), and nurses (n = 44). Readmissions were emergent/urgent (95%) and occurred within 14.9 days (SD, 8.1; 2-28 days) on average after discharge. Index stay coding revealed that most patients (73%) had a high severity of illness (73%) and risk of mortality (68%). Heart failure stage was inconsistently documented. Patients reported acute symptomatic reasons, with only 32% describing readmission as preventable. Physicians reported diagnostic reasons, 38% of which were preventable. Nurses reported behavioral reasons, with 59% being preventable. Patient/clinician agreement on readmission reason was low (30%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient/clinician perspectives on readmission varied among the patients with complex HF. Care planning based on HF stage and other contextual factors is needed to ensure a shared understanding of disease severity and a tailored symptom management approach to prevent readmission.

30- and 60-Day Readmission Rates for Children With Heart Failure in the United States

BACKGROUND

Studies on readmission for pediatric heart failure (HF) patients is sparse.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated 30- and 60-day readmission rates in pediatric HF patients from 2010 to 2019.

METHODS

The authors used data from the Nationwide Readmission Database to evaluate trends in 30- and 60-day hospital readmissions among pediatric patients with HF and compare them with adults with HF. Readmissions were also stratified by sex, diagnosis, neighborhood income, and hospital volume.

RESULTS

There were 84,731 hospital admissions for HF. Compared with children without HF, those with HF were older, had Medicare/Medicaid insurance, and resided in micropolitan areas and low-income neighborhoods. The 30- (19.5% vs 3.1%) and 60-day (27.5% vs 4.3%) all-cause readmission rates were higher for children with HF compared with those without HF. Compared with children without HF, lengths of stay, deaths, and costs related to their readmission were higher for children readmitted with HF (P < 0.05 for all). There was no significant decline in pediatric HF-related 30- or 60- day readmissions during the study period overall, or for those with congenital heart disease (P > 0.05), unlike adult HF readmissions (P < 0.01). Infants were at highest risk, and readmission rates for teenagers are rising.

CONCLUSIONS

The 30- and 60-day readmission rates for pediatric patients with HF in the current era is high (∼20% and 30%, respectively). Unlike adult HF, pediatric HF readmission rates have not declined. Pediatric HF patients readmitted to the hospital have higher death rates and greater resource utilization than patients without HF. National measures to decrease readmissions for pediatric patients with HF is warranted.

Nurses' knowledge of heart failure assessment and management: A cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

Nurses' knowledge of heart failure (HF) is highly variable, ranging from expert to poor, potentially leading to inadequate self-care.

OBJECTIVES

(1) document the knowledge variation of HF assessment and management among specialist and generalist nurses; (2) determine factors that may be associated with nurses' knowledge; and (3) describe nurses' views of knowledge deficits and ways to improve nurses' knowledge to better meet the needs educational interventions.

METHOD

Members of the American Association of Heart Failure Nurses and Registered Nurses were invited to participate in a cross-sectional survey. Independent samples t-test, chi-square, and linear regression were used for quantitative analysis. Text analysis was applied to analyze the themes of qualitative comments.

RESULTS

A total of 918 nurses completed the survey. Specialist nurses had higher scores than generalist nurses with statistically significant F-test for diet, fluid, signs/symptoms, medication, and exercise. Both specialist and generalist nurses were least knowledgeable about dry weight, asymptomatic hypotension, and transient dizziness. Being a specialist nurse was associated with higher level of knowledge scores. Years of experience and race were significant factors associated with knowledge scores in generalist nurses. Confidence level and race were significant predictors for specialist nurses. Three themes emerged regarding the cause of nurses' insufficient knowledge and several approaches were provided.

CONCLUSIONS

Specialist nurses are not only knowledgeable, but their knowledge levels are less variable compared to generalist nurses. There is a need to identify additional factors that may potentially influence nurses' knowledge, contributing to the effectiveness of interventions.

Outcomes of nurse-led telecoaching intervention for patients with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Studies have identified that nurse-led telephone health coaching benefited the continuity of care in patients with heart failure. However, the effect of nurse-led telephone health coaching remains inconclusive among the previous studies.

AIM

This review aimed to determine the effects of nurse-led telecoaching among patients with heart failure.

DESIGN

This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. This study was reported in accordance with the PRISMA guideline.

METHODS

Seven databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane library and Ovid) were electronically searched up to 20 October 2020. The eligibility criteria were a randomised controlled trial study on heart failure patients, with the intervention led by a nurse through telephone coaching. Two authors independently evaluated the methodological quality using the modified Jadad scale. The Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software version 3.0 with a random effect model was used to conduct a meta-analysis, and Begg's and Egger's tests were performed to assess publication bias. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis was carried out.

RESULTS

A total of 12 randomised controlled trials were met eligibility criteria and representing 1938 heart failure patients. The results showed that the nurse-led telecoaching significantly enhanced patients' self-care behaviour (SMD = .84, 95%CI [0.45-1.24], p < .001) and improved quality of life (SMD = .23, 95%CI [0.06-0.39], p = .007).

CONCLUSION

Nurse-led telecoaching appears to enhance self-care behaviour and improve quality of life in patients with heart failure. Further research needs to build the evidence for nurse-led telecoaching intervention, including understanding its mechanisms of action (e.g. frequency, components) and identifying its moderating factors.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Implementation of nurse-led telecoaching is deemed helpful in promoting continuity of care because it was an accessible and sustainable intervention to improve patients' self-care and quality of life.

Effects of Predischarge Patient Education Combined With Postdischarge Follow-Ups on Self-Care, Readmission, Sleep, and Depression in Patients With Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Patients with heart failure rarely engage in adequate self-care. Greater emphasis on self-care discharge readiness is needed.

PURPOSE

This study examined the effects of a predischarge educational program combined with 1 year of postdischarge follow-up on self-care behaviors, readmission, sleep quality, and depression in patients with heart failure.

METHODS

A longitudinal, nonequivalent two-group pretest-posttest design was used. The intervention group received tailored education and follow-ups, whereas the control group received routine predischarge heart-failure education from direct care nurses only. Measurements included the self-care maintenance and self-care management subscales of the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index, Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and readmission rate. Data obtained at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postdischarge were analyzed using linear mixed models with both intention-to-treat and per-protocol approaches. The propensity score was used to adjust for the confounding effects of the New York Heart Association functional class and left ventricular ejection fraction.

RESULTS

Of the 62 patients with heart failure (28 in the intervention group and 34 in the control group) who were sampled at baseline, 47 (n = 25 vs. n = 22) provided data over the entire course of this 1-year study (76% retention rate). The per-protocol analysis did not find significant differences for any variables. However, the intention-to-treat analysis showed that the intervention group significantly improved in self-care maintenance at 6 months and self-care management at 12 months after hospital discharge, with fewer, albeit not significantly fewer, first and subsequent hospital readmissions than the control group.

CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The effect of this intervention was not found to be substantial, indicating a need to design more efficacious and powerful interventions. Hospitalized patients must receive patient education before discharge to foster their self-care knowledge and skills regarding self-care at home. Strategies are needed to help nurses provide patient education in a time-efficient manner.

Navigating Symptom Management in Heart Failure: The Crucial Role of the Critical Care Nurse

High-acuity, progressive care, and critical care nurses often provide care for patients with heart failure during an exacerbation of acute disease or at the end of life. Identifying and managing heart failure symptoms is complex and requires early recognition and early intervention. Because symptoms of heart failure are not disease specific, patients may not respond to them appropriately, resulting in treatment delays. This article reviews the complexities and issues surrounding the patient's ability to recognize heart failure symptoms and the critical care nurse's role in facilitating early intervention. It outlines the many barriers to symptom recognition and response, including multimorbidities, age, symptom intensity, symptom escalation, and health literacy. The influence of self-care on heart failure management is also described. The critical care nurse plays a crucial role in teaching heart failure patients to identify and respond appropriately to their symptoms, thus promoting early intervention.