Treatment of brain metastases from melanoma

Barriers to Effective Drug Treatment for Brain Metastases: A Multifactorial Problem in the Delivery of Precision Medicine

The treatment of metastatic lesions in the brain represents a serious unmet medical need in the field of neuro-oncology. Even though many effective compounds have demonstrated success in treating peripheral (non-CNS) tumors with targeted agents, one aspect of this lack of success in the brain may be related to poor delivery of otherwise effective compounds. Many factors can influence the brain delivery of these agents, but one key barrier is a heterogeneously "leaky" BBB that expresses efflux transporters that limit the BBB permeability for many targeted agents. Future success in therapeutics for brain metastases must take into account the adequate delivery of "active, free drug" to the target, and may include combinations of targeted drugs that are appropriate to address each individual patient's tumor type. This review discusses some issues that are pertinent to precision medicine for brain metastases, using specific examples of tumor types that have a high incidence of brain metastases.

The Treatment of Melanoma Brain Metastases

Melanoma is the malignancy with the highest rate of dissemination to the central nervous system once it metastasizes. Until recently, the prognosis of patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) was poor. In recent years, however, the prognosis has improved due to high-resolution imaging that facilitates early detection of small asymptomatic brain metastases and early intervention with local modalities such as stereotactic radiosurgery. More recently, a number of systemic therapies have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for metastatic melanoma, resulting in improved survival for many MBM patients. Registration trials for these newer therapies excluded patients with untreated brain metastases, and a number of studies specifically tailored to this population of patients have been conducted or are underway. Herein, we review contemporary locoregional and systemic therapies and describe the unique challenges posed by treatment of brain metastases, such as radionecrosis, cerebral edema, and pseudoprogression. Since the number of systemic and combined modality clinical trials has increased, we expect that the treatment landscape for patients with melanoma brain metastasis will change dramatically. In addition to ongoing clinical trials, which show great promise, we conclude that our understanding of intracranial metastasis remains quite limited. In addition to inter-disciplinary, multi-modality studies, bench-side work to better understand the process of cerebrotropism is needed to fuel more drug development and further improve outcomes.

Drug delivery to melanoma brain metastases: Can current challenges lead to new opportunities?

Melanoma has a high propensity to metastasize to the brain, and patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) have an extremely poor prognosis. The recent approval of several molecularly-targeted agents (e.g., BRAF, MEK inhibitors) and biologics (anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies) has brought new hope to patients suffering from this formerly untreatable and lethal disease. Importantly, there have been recent reports of success in some clinical studies examining the efficacy of both targeted agents and immunotherapies that show similar response rates in both brain metastases and extracranial disease. While these studies are encouraging, there remains significant room for improvement in the treatment of MBM, given the lack of durable response and the development of resistance to current therapies. Critical questions remain regarding mechanisms that lead to this lack of durable response and development of resistance, and how those mechanisms may differ in systemic sites versus brain metastases. One issue that may not be fully appreciated is that the delivery of several small molecule molecularly-targeted therapies to the brain is often restricted due to active efflux at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) interface. Inadequate local drug concentrations may be partially responsible for the development of unique patterns of resistance at metastatic sites in the brain. It is clear that there can be local, heterogeneous BBB breakdown in MBM, as exemplified by contrast-enhancement on T1-weighted MR imaging. However, it is possible that the successful treatment of MBM with small molecule targeted therapies will depend, in part, on the ability of these therapies to penetrate an intact BBB and reach the protected micro-metastases (so called "sub-clinical" disease) that escape early detection by contrast-enhanced MRI, as well as regions of tumor within MRI-detectable metastases that may have a less compromised BBB. The emergence of resistance in MBM may be related to several diverse, yet interrelated, factors including the distinct microenvironment of the brain and inadequate brain penetration of targeted therapies to specific regions of tumor. The tumor microenvironment has been ascribed to play a key role in steering the course of disease progression, by dictating changes in expression of tumor drivers and resistance-related signaling mechanisms. Therefore, a key issue to consider is how changes in drug delivery, and hence local drug concentrations within a metastatic microenvironment, will influence the development of resistance. Herein we discuss our perspective on several critical questions that focus on many aspects relevant to the treatment of melanoma brain metastases; the answers to which may lead to important advances in the treatment of this devastating disease.

4-11C-Methoxy N-(2-Diethylaminoethyl) Benzamide: A Novel Probe to Selectively Target Melanoma

We report the synthesis and preclinical evaluation of a ¹¹C-labeled probe to target melanoma using PET. Methods: The target compound 4-¹¹C-methoxy N-(2-diethylaminoethyl) benzamide (4-¹¹C-MBZA) was prepared via the ¹¹C-methylation of 4-hydroxy N-(2-diethylaminoethyl) benzamide (4-HBZA). The in vitro binding was performed using B16F1 (melanoma cells), MCF-10A (breast epithelial cells), and MDA-MB 231 (breast cancer cells). The internalization studies were conducted using B16F1 cells. In vivo biodistribution and small-animal PET imaging were performed in mice bearing B16F1 melanoma tumor xenografts. Results: The target compound 4-¹¹C-MBZA was prepared in 46% ± 7% radiochemical yields by reacting ¹¹C-methyltriflate with 4-HBZA followed by high-performance liquid chromatography purification. The specific activity of this compound was 853 ± 29.6 GBq/μmol (23 ± 0.8 Ci/μmol). The binding of 4-¹¹C-MBZA to B16F1, MCF-10A, and MDA-MB-231 cells was 6.41% ± 1.28%, 1.51% ± 0.17%, and 0.30% ± 0.17%, respectively. Internalization studies using B16F1 melanoma cells show 60.7% of the cell-bound activity was internalized. Results from biodistribution studies show a rapid and high uptake of radioactivity in the tumor, with uptake levels reaching 5.85 ± 0.79 and 8.13 ± 1.46 percentage injected dose per gram at 10 and 60 min, respectively. Low uptake in normal tissues in conjunction with high tumor uptake resulted in high tumor-to-tissue ratios. On small-animal PET images, the tumor was clearly delineated soon after 4-¹¹C-MBZA injection and tumor uptake reached 4.2 percentage injected dose per gram by 20 min. These preclinical evaluations show a high propensity of 4-¹¹C-MBZA toward melanoma tumor. Conclusion: We successfully developed 4-¹¹C-MBZA as a PET imaging probe, displaying properties advantageous over those for its ¹⁸F analogs. These preclinical evaluation results demonstrate the clinical potential of this probe to selectively target melanoma.

Challenges in the delivery of therapies to melanoma brain metastases

Brain metastases are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced melanoma. Recent approval of several molecularly-targeted agents and biologics has brought hope to patients with this previously untreatable disease. However, patients with symptomatic melanoma brain metastases have often been excluded from pivotal clinical trials. This may be in part attributed to the fact that several of the approved small molecule molecularly-targeted agents are substrates for active efflux at the blood-brain barrier, limiting their effective delivery to brain metastases. We believe that successful treatment of melanoma brain metastases will depend on the ability of these agents to traverse the blood-brain barrier and reach micrometastases that are often not clinically detectable. Moreover, overcoming the emergence of a unique pattern of resistance, possibly through adequate delivery of combination targeted therapies in brain metastases will be important in achieving a durable response. These concepts, and the current challenges in the delivery of new treatments to melanoma brain metastases, are discussed in this review.

Recursive Partitioning Analysis of Prognostic Factors for Patients with Four or More Intracranial Metastases Treated with Radiosurgery

The purpose of this study was to devise a new recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of patients with four or more intracranial metastases treated with a single radiosurgery procedure to identify a class of patients with extended survival. 205 patients underwent Gamma Knife radiosurgery for four or more intracranial metastases (median = 5, range 4–18) during one session. The median total treatment volume was 6.8 cc (range 0.6–51.0 cc). Radiosurgery was used as sole management (17% of patients), or in combination with WB-RT (46%), or after failure of WB-RT (38%). The median marginal radiosurgery dose was 16 Gy (range 12–20 Gy). RPA assessed the effects of age, Karnofsky >70, extracranial disease, visceral metastases, number of metastases, total treatment volume, history of breast and melanoma primaries on survival. The median overall survival after radiosurgery for all patients was 8 months. RPA identified a favorable subgroup of 78 patients (43% of the series) with a total treatment volume <7 cc and < 7 brain metastases (Class 1), with a median survival of 13 months. This subgroup's survival was significantly better (p <0.00005) than the remaining patients (Class 2) (n=111) with a median survival of 6 months. In conclusion, RPA of multiple brain metastasis patients identified 2 distinct cohorts of patients. Class 1 patients have a total treatment volume <7 cc and < 7 metastases (4–6) with favorable survival after Radiosurgery and Class 2 patients have a total treatment volume ≥ 7 cc and/or ≥ 7 metastases and have a significantly poorer survival.

Ipilimumab and craniotomy in patients with melanoma and brain metastases: a case series

OBJECT In patients with large or symptomatic brain lesions from metastatic melanoma, the value of resection of metastases to facilitate administration of systemic ipilimumab therapy has not yet been described. The authors undertook this study to investigate whether craniotomy creates the opportunity for patients to receive and benefit from ipilimumab who would otherwise succumb to brain metastasis prior to the onset of regression. METHODS All patients with metastatic melanoma who received ipilimumab and underwent craniotomy for metastasis resection between 2008 and 2014 at the Massachusetts General Hospital were identified through retrospective chart review. The final analysis included cases involving patients who underwent craniotomy within 3 months prior to initiation of therapy or up to 6 months after cessation of ipilimumab administration. RESULTS Twelve patients met the inclusion criteria based on timing of therapy (median age 59.2). The median number of metastases at the time of craniotomy was 2. The median number of ipilimumab doses received was 4. Eleven of 12 courses of ipilimumab were stopped for disease progression, and 1 was stopped for treatment-induced colitis. Eight of 12 patients had improvement in their performance status following craniotomy. Of the 6 patients requiring corticosteroids prior to craniotomy, 3 tolerated corticosteroid dose reduction after surgery. Ten of 12 patients had died by the time of data collection, with 1 patient lost to follow-up. The median survival after the start of ipilimumab treatment was 7 months. CONCLUSIONS In this series, patients who underwent resection of brain metastases in temporal proximity to receiving ipilimumab had qualitatively improved performance status following surgery in most cases. Surgery facilitated corticosteroid reduction in select patients. Larger analyses are required to better understand possible synergies between craniotomy for melanoma metastases and ipilimumab treatment.

Efficacy and safety of ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma and brain metastases

Patients with melanoma brain metastases have a poor prognosis and historically have been excluded from clinical trials. The Expanded Access Program (EAP) provided an opportunity to evaluate the feasibility of ipilimumab (3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses) in patients with stage 3 (unresectable) or 4 melanoma and asymptomatic brain metastases, who had failed or did not tolerate previous treatments and had no other therapeutic option available. Tumor assessments were conducted at baseline and week 12 using immune-related response criteria and patients were monitored for adverse events (AEs). Of 855 patients participating in the EAP in Italy, 146 had asymptomatic brain metastases. With a median follow-up of 4 months, the global disease control rate was 27%, including 4 patients with a complete response and 13 with a partial response. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.8 and 4.3 months, respectively and approximately one-fifth of patients were alive 1 year after starting ipilimumab. In total, 29% of patients reported a treatment-related AE of any grade, which were grade 3/4 in 6% of patients. AEs were generally reversible with treatment as per protocol-specific guidelines. Ipilimumab shows durable benefits in some patients with advanced melanoma metastatic to the brain, with safety results consistent with those previously reported in clinical trials.

Neurodermatology

Since the skin and the central and/or peripheral nervous system share a common source (the ectoderm), numerous genetic and acquired diseases (infectious, tumoral or autoimmune disorders) equally affect both. Neurologic diseases or symptoms such as stroke, cerebral or medullary vascular malformations, peripheral, brain or medullary tumors, epilepsy, ataxia, neurologic infections, or cognitive disorders (dementia, mental retardation) may be associated with specific cutaneous manifestations of which the discovery can facilitate the final diagnosis, thereby leading to specific treatment and/or genetic investigations. Careful examination of the skin, hair, and nails by the neurologist is consequently of the utmost importance; when unusual abnormalities of the skin are discovered or when greater expertise is required, consultation with a dermatologist is frequently advisable.

The role of radiotherapy in the overall treatment of melanoma

Radiotherapy has become an effective treatment in the management of melanoma patients. It has its place beneath surgical treatment options in a tumor entity that has only limited response to systemic medical therapies. New therapies, such as ipilimumab and vemurafenib, may prolong survival for several months but will cure only a few patients. Radiotherapy will still be required in adjuvant settings to reduce the local recurrence rate and in palliative situations, particularly in brain and bone metastasis. We review several indications for radiotherapy in the management of malignant melanoma with an effect on the guidelines in our clinical practice.

Advances in therapy for melanoma brain metastases

Melanoma cells frequently metastasize to the brain, and approximately 50% of patients with metastatic melanoma develop intracranial disease. Historically, central nervous system dissemination has portended a very poor prognosis. Recent advances in systemic therapies for melanoma, supported by improved local therapy control of brain lesions, have resulted in better median survival for these patients. We review current local and systemic approaches for patients with melanoma brain metastases.

Isolated cerebral susceptibility artefacts in patients with malignant melanoma: metastasis or not?

OBJECTIVE

While staging patients with malignant melanoma, cerebral susceptibility artefacts on T2*-weighted/susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) sequences without a correlate on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images can be confusing. Without intravenous contrast enhancement, cavernomas, microhaemorrhages and melanin-containing metastases represent possible differential diagnoses for these findings. The purpose of this study was to find out, how often such lesions correspond to metastases.

METHODS

Brain MR images (1.5 T) of 408 patients with malignant melanoma but without cerebral metastases in the initial staging by MRI were reviewed retrospectively. Eighteen patients (5 female, 13 male) with malignant melanoma and signal intensity loss on T2*/SWI were included in our study. The average observation period was 19.6 months (6-46 months, 2006-2009).

RESULTS

In each of these 18 patients between one and seven hypointense lesions on T2*/SWI were found. None of these lesions developed into metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Focal areas of susceptibility artefacts in the brain parenchyma without corresponding abnormalities in contrast-enhanced T1 weighted images are unlikely to represent brain metastases.

KEY POINTS

• In melanoma patients early diagnosis of metastatic brain lesions is mandatory. • Melanin content and haemorrhage are potential reasons for MRI characteristics of melanoma metastases. • Susceptibility-weighted MRI visualises melanin and blood products. • Isolated cerebral susceptibility artefacts do not convert into melanoma metastases. • SWI/T2* sequences cannot replace Gd-enhanced sequences.

Melanoma brain metastasis: overview of current management and emerging targeted therapies

The high rate of brain metastasis in patients with advanced melanoma has been a clinical challenge for oncologists. Despite considerable progress made in the management of advanced melanoma over the past two decades, improvement in overall survival has been elusive. This is due to the high incidence of CNS metastases, which progress relentlessly and which are only anecdotally responsive to systemic therapies. Surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery and whole-brain radiotherapy with or without cytotoxic chemotherapy remain the mainstay of treatment. However, new drugs have been developed based on our improved understanding of the molecular signaling mechanisms responsible for host immune tolerance and for melanoma growth. In 2011, the US FDA approved two agents, one antagonizing each of these processes, for the treatment of advanced melanoma. The first is ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody that enhances cellular immunity and reduces tolerance to tumor-associated antigens. The second is vemurafenib, an inhibitor that blocks the abnormal signaling for melanoma cellular growth in tumors that carry the BRAF(V600E) mutation. Both drugs have anecdotal clinical activity for brain metastasis and are being evaluated in clinical trial settings. Additional clinical trials of newer agents involving these pathways are also showing promise. Therefore, targeted therapies must be incorporated into the multimodality management of melanoma brain metastasis.

Preclinical evaluation of an 131I-labeled benzamide for targeted radiotherapy of metastatic melanoma

Radiolabeled benzamides are attractive candidates for targeted radiotherapy of metastatic melanoma as they bind melanin and exhibit high tumor uptake and retention. One such benzamide, N-(2-diethylamino-ethyl)-4-(4-fluoro-benzamido)-5-iodo-2-methoxy-benzamide (MIP-1145), was evaluated for its ability to distinguish melanin-expressing from amelanotic human melanoma cells, and to specifically localize to melanin-containing tumor xenografts. The binding of [(131)I]MIP-1145 to melanoma cells in vitro was melanin dependent, increased over time, and insensitive to mild acid treatment, indicating that it was retained within cells. Cold carrier MIP-1145 did not reduce the binding, consistent with the high capacity of melanin binding of benzamides. In human melanoma xenografts, [(131)I]MIP-1145 exhibited diffuse tissue distribution and washout from all tissues except melanin-expressing tumors. Tumor uptake of 8.82% injected dose per gram (ID/g) was seen at 4 hours postinjection and remained at 5.91% ID/g at 24 hours, with tumor/blood ratios of 25.2 and 197, respectively. Single photon emission computed tomography imaging was consistent with tissue distribution results. The administration of [(131)I]MIP-1145 at 25 MBq or 2.5 GBq/m(2) in single or multiple doses significantly reduced SK-MEL-3 tumor growth, with multiple doses resulting in tumor regression and a durable response for over 125 days. To estimate human dosimetry, gamma camera imaging and pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in cynomolgus monkeys. The melanin-specific binding of [(131)I]MIP-1145 combined with prolonged tumor retention, the ability to significantly inhibit tumor growth, and acceptable projected human dosimetry suggest that it may be effective as a radiotherapeutic pharmaceutical for treating patients with metastatic malignant melanoma.

Determinants of survival in patients with brain metastases from cutaneous melanoma

Background:

This retrospective study aimed to identify prognostic factors in patients with brain metastases from cutaneous melanoma.

Methods:

In all, 265 patients under regular screening according to valid national surveillance guidelines were included in the study. Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed to estimate and to compare overall survival. Cox modeling was used to identify independent determinants of the overall survival, which were used in explorative classification and regression tree analysis to define meaningful prognostic groups.

Results:

In total, 55.5% of our patients presented with two or less brain metastases, 82.6% had concurrent extracranial metastasis and 64% were asymptomatic and diagnosed during surveillance scans. In all, 36.7% were candidates for local treatment (neurosurgery or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)). The median overall survival of the entire collective was 5.0 months (95% confidence interval: 4.3–5.7). Favourable independent prognostic factors were: normal pre-treatment level of serum lactate dehydrogenase (P<0.001), administered therapy (neurosurgery or SRS vs other, P=0.002), number of brain metastases (single vs multiple, P=0.032) and presence of bone metastasis (false vs true, P=0.044). Three prognostic groups with significantly different overall survival were identified. Candidates for local treatment (group I) had the longer median survival (9 months). Remaining patients could be further classified in two groups on the basis of serum lactate dehydrogenase.

Conclusion:

Applied treatment and serum lactate dehydrogenase levels were independent predictors of survival of patients with brain metastases from cutaneous melanoma. Patients receiving local therapy have overall survival comparable with general stage IV melanoma patients.

Surgical treatment of advanced melanoma

Primary surgical treatment should be considered for patients with metastatic melanoma. Because of the poor response of melanoma to chemotherapy or radiation therapy, surgery can be the best approach to quickly eliminate detectable disease and return the patient to normal activities. In properly selected patients, surgery can lead to significant palliation and prolongation of survival. This article reviews the principles of patient selection and the potential benefits of surgical management of melanoma metastatic to various sites. Novel adjuvant therapies are being developed to augment the benefits of surgical treatment of advanced melanoma in the future.

Surgery and radiotherapy in the treatment of cutaneous melanoma

Adequate surgical management of primary melanoma and regional lymph node metastasis, and rarely distant metastasis, is the only established curative treatment. Surgical management of primary melanomas consists of excisions with 1–2 cm margins and primary closure. The recommended method of biopsy is excisional biopsy with a 2 mm margin and a small amount of subcutaneous fat. In specific situations (very large lesions or certain anatomical areas), full-thickness incisional or punch biopsy may be acceptable. Sentinel lymph node biopsy provides accurate staging information for patients with clinically unaffected regional nodes and without distant metastases, although survival benefit has not been proved. In cases of positive sentinel node biopsy or clinically detected regional nodal metastases (palpable, positive cytology or histopathology), radical removal of lymph nodes of the involved basin is indicated. For resectable local/in-transit recurrences, excision with a clear margin is recommended. For numerous or unresectable in-transit metastases of the extremities, isolated limb perfusion or infusion with melphalan should be considered. Decisions about surgery of distant metastases should be based on individual circumstances. Radiotherapy is indicated as a treatment option in select patients with lentigo maligna melanoma and as an adjuvant in select patients with regional metastatic disease. Radiotherapy is also indicated for palliation, especially in bone and brain metastases.

A rational surgical approach to the treatment of distant melanoma metastases

The optimal treatment of melanoma involves multidisciplinary care. To many, this means surgical resection of early, localized disease and treatment of metastatic disease with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiation. Because it is effective, results in little morbidity and may be repeated, surgery should have a central role in the treatment of selected patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage IV melanoma.

Treatments for metastatic melanoma: synthesis of evidence from randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Advanced melanomas (non-resectable Stage-III/IV) are fatal, with few effective treatments. It remains unclear if other drugs offer improvements over the standard, dacarbazine.

PURPOSE

We quantified objective response rates (Complete+Partial response) of dacarbazine versus comparators for advanced cutaneous melanoma.

METHODS

We retrieved all head-to-head randomized controlled trials involving dacarbazine and other drugs/combinations. Two reviewers searched MEDLINE (1966-Jan 2006), EMBASE (1980-2006), CINAHL (1982-2006) and Cochrane library, then compared results. Differences were resolved through consensus. Rates were combined using random effects meta-analysis. chi2 tested heterogeneity; points from Jadad's method were assessed to examine study quality.

RESULTS

We found 48 studies having 111 active treatment arms [24 with dacarbazine monotherapy (n=1390), 75 with dacarbazine combinations (n=4962), and 12 with non-dacarbazine treatments (n=783)] treating 7135 patients. Overall, study quality was poor. Response to dacarbazine monotherapy ranged between 5.3% and 28.0% (average 15.3%), OR=1.31, CI(95%): 1.06-1.61; N=3356. Partial responses comprised 73% of successes. Only adding interferons improved response rates (OR=1.69, CI(95%): 1.07-2.68, N=778) but survival duration was not significantly longer (P=0.32), and trials with larger sample sizes found lower success rates. All other treatments alone or in combination were ineffective P>0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

Dacarbazine generally produces poor outcomes. Adding other therapies offers minimal clinical advantages (possibly with interferons). In general, study quality was poor and sample sizes were small. This meta-analysis highlights the unmet need for effective treatment options for advanced melanoma.

GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF MALIGNANT MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES

OBJECTIVE

Radiosurgery is increasingly used to manage malignant melanoma brain metastases. We reviewed our series of patients who underwent radiosurgery for melanoma brain metastases to assess clinical outcomes and identify prognostic factors for survival and cerebral disease control.

METHODS

Two hundred forty-four patients had radiosurgery for the management of 754 metastatic tumors. A mean of 2.6 tumors were irradiated per procedure. The median tumor volume was 4.4 cm3. The median margin and maximum doses used were 18 and 32 Gy, respectively.

RESULTS

The median survival was 5.3 months after radiosurgery (mean, 10 mo; range, 0.2–114.3 mo). Patients survived a median of 7.8 months (mean, 13.4 mo) from the diagnosis of brain metastases and 44.9 months (mean, 69 mo) after the diagnosis of the primary tumor. Survival was better in patients with controlled systemic disease (12.7 mo), single brain metastasis (6.8 mo), and a Karnofsky performance score of 90 or 100% (6.3 mo). Sustained local control was achieved in 86.2% of tumors. Increased tumor volume and previous evidence of hemorrhage increased the risk of local failure. Multiple lesions and failure to provide systemic immunotherapy were predictors for the occurrence of new brain metastases, which developed in 41.7% of the patients. Symptomatic radiation changes occurred in 6.6% of the patients. Overall, 71.4% of the patients improved or remained clinically stable. Brain disease was the cause of death in 40.5% of the patients, usually from the development of new metastases.

CONCLUSION

Gamma knife radiosurgery for malignant melanoma brain metastases is safe and effective and provides a high rate of durable local control. Improved survival can be achieved in patients with single metastasis, controlled systemic disease, and a high Karnofsky performance score.

The role of surgery in treatment of stage IV melanoma

The prognosis for patients with melanoma has not improved over the last 30 years. So far, almost without exception, clinical trials conducted with single or multiple agent chemotherapy, biological therapy (interferon-alpha, interleukin-2), and biochemotherapy have failed to demonstrate consistent survival benefit. Without effective alternate treatments, surgery must be considered the primary treatment of melanoma, independent of disease stage. Although surgery is clearly favored as the treatment of localized melanoma, consensus opinion and clinician preference become divided once melanoma progresses beyond its primary site. Many physicians will adopt an attitude of resignation and hesitancy when treating metastatic melanoma. As a result, patients with advanced disease are often treated with medications that produce little survival or palliative benefit at the expense of significant toxicity. Numerous studies have demonstrated clear and durable survival advantages for patients undergoing complete resection of metastatic melanoma. Further, surgical resection can produce an immediate decrease in tumor burden with minimal morbidity and mortality at a reasonable cost.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for four or more intracranial metastases

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes after a single stereotactic radiosurgery procedure for the care of patients with 4 or more intracranial metastases.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two hundred five patients with primary malignancies, including non-small-cell lung carcinoma (42%), breast carcinoma (23%), melanoma (17%), renal cell carcinoma (6%), colon cancer (3%), and others (10%) underwent gamma knife radiosurgery for 4 or more intracranial metastases at one time. The median number of brain metastases was 5 (range, 4-18) with a median total treatment volume of 6.8 cc (range, 0.6-51.0 cc). Radiosurgery was used as sole management (17% of patients), or in combination with whole brain radiotherapy (46%) or after failure of whole brain radiotherapy (38%). The median marginal radiosurgery dose was 16 Gy (range, 12-20 Gy). The mean follow-up was 8 months.

RESULTS

The median overall survival after radiosurgery for all patients was 8 months. The 1-year local control rate was 71%, and the median time to progressive/new brain metastases was 9 months. Using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification system, the median overall survivals for RPA classes I, II, and III were 18, 9, and 3 months, respectively (p < 0.00001). Multivariate analysis revealed total treatment volume, age, RPA classification, and marginal dose as significant prognostic factors. The number of metastases was not statistically significant (p = 0.333).

CONCLUSION

Radiosurgery seems to provide survival benefit for patients with 4 or more intracranial metastases. Because total treatment volume was the most significant predictor of survival, the total volume of brain metastases, rather than the number of metastases, should be considered in identifying appropriate radiosurgery candidates.

RNA interference and nonviral targeted gene therapy of experimental brain cancer

The human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays an oncogenic role in solid cancer, including brain primary and metastatic cancers. Transvascular nonviral gene therapy in combination with EGFR-RNA interference (RNAi) represents a new therapeutic approach to silencing oncogenic genes in solid cancers. This is achieved with pegylated immunoliposomes (PIL) carrying short hairpin RNA expression plasmids driven by the U6 RNA polymerase promoter and directed to target EGFR expression by RNAi. The PIL is comprised of a mixture of known lipids containing polyethyleneglycol (PEG), which stabilizes the PIL structure in vivo in circulation. The tissue target specificity of PILs is given by conjugation of approximately 1% of the PEG residues to monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that bind to specific endogenous receptors (i.e., insulin and transferrin receptors) located in the brain vascular endothelium, which forms the blood brain barrier (BBB), and brain cellular membranes, respectively. These mAbs are known to induce 1) receptor-mediated transcytosis of the PIL complex through the BBB and 2) transport to the brain cell nuclear compartment. Treatment of an experimental human brain tumor model in scid mice is possible with weekly intravenous RNAi gene therapy causing reduced tumor expression of EGFR and 88% increase in survival time of these mice with advanced intracranial brain cancer. The availability of additional RNAi tumor targets may improve the therapeutic efficacy of this new anticancer drug. The accessibility to chimeric and/or humanized mAbs directed to human BBB and brain cell specific-receptors may accelerate the application of this technology to the treatment of human tumors.

Temozolomide plus thalidomide in patients with brain metastases from melanoma: a phase II study

BACKGROUND

Temozolomide plus thalidomide is a promising oral combination regimen for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. The current Phase II study examined the efficacy and safety of this combination in chemotherapy-naive patients with brain metastases.

METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic melanoma and measurable brain metastases received temozolomide (75 mg/m2 per day for 6 weeks with a 2-week break between cycles) plus concomitant thalidomide (200 mg/day escalating to 400 mg/day for patients < 70 years or 100 mg/day escalating to 250 mg/day for patients > or = 70 years). The primary end point was tumor response in the brain assessed every 8 weeks.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients with a median age of 60 years were treated. All patients had progressive brain metastases: 16 were symptomatic and 25 had extensive extracranial metastases. Eight patients had received whole-brain radiotherapy, 4 had received stereotactic radiotherapy, and 8 had received craniotomy with resection of hemorrhagic lesions. Fifteen patients completed > or = 1 cycle (median, 1 cycle; range, 0-4 cycles), and 11 discontinued treatment before completing 1 cycle (7 for intracranial hemorrhage, 2 for pulmonary embolism, 1 for deep vein thrombosis, and 1 for Grade 3 rash). Of 15 patients assessable for response, 3 had a complete or partial response (12% intent to treat) and 7 had minor response or stable disease in the brain. However, 5 of these 10 patients had disease progression at extracranial sites. The median survival period was 5 months for all 26 patients and 6 months for the 15 assessable patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Temozolomide plus thalidomide was an active oral regimen for patients with brain metastases from malignant melanoma.

Antiangiogenic potential of 10-hydroxycamptothecin

To investigate the antiangiogenic potential of 10-hydroxycamptothecin (HCPT), the proliferation of human microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC) and seven human tumor cell lines were detected by SRB assay, and the endothelial cell migration and tube formation were assessed using two in vitro model systems. Also, inhibition of angiogenesis was determined with a modification of the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay in vivo. Morphological assessment of apoptosis was performed by fluorescence microscope. HCPT 0.313-5 micromol x L(-1) treatment resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of proliferation, migration and tube formation in HMEC cells, and HCPT 6.25-25 nmol x egg(-1) inhibited angiogenesis in CAM assay. HCPT 1.25-5 micromol x L(-1) elicited typical morphological changes of apoptosis including condensed chromatin, nuclear fragmentation, and reduction in volume in HMEC cells. HCPT significantly inhibited angiogenesis both in vitro and in vivo at relatively low concentrations, and this effect was related with induction of apoptosis in HMEC cells. These results taken collectively suggest that HCPT may be a potent antiangiogenetic and cytotoxic drug and further investigation is warranted.