Formulating an effective and efficient written asthma action plan

Development and psychometric evaluation of the asthma Action plan questionnaire (AAPQ)

OBJECTIVE

To develop a practical and psychometrically sound tool to evaluate caregiver knowledge of their child's asthma action plan (AAP).

METHODS

A pilot study was conducted in a sample of 40 caregivers of children with asthma to assess the content validity, item difficulty, and item discrimination of the Asthma Action Plan Questionnaire (AAPQ). The inter-rater and intra-rater agreement of the AAPQ's scoring rubric were also examined. Subsequently, a large-scale study was conducted in a sample of 80 caregivers of children with asthma and 40 caregivers of children without current asthma and no prior exposure to patients with asthma to evaluate the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and known-groups validity of the AAPQ.

RESULTS

The 7-item AAPQ demonstrated acceptable content validity (a scale-content validity index of 0.98) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha =.63 and mean inter-item correlation coefficient of.20) and very strong test-retest reliability over a two-to-four-week period (r = .88, p < .001). The AAPQ discriminated between caregivers of children with asthma and caregivers of children without asthma (M ± SD 8.3 ± 1.6 vs. 4.3 ± 1.7, p < .001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The AAPQ is a valid and reliable questionnaire that provides an assessment of caregivers' knowledge of their child's AAP and can guide educational interventions by healthcare providers.

Environmental management of asthma in clinical practice: Results from the 2012 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey

Background

The National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidelines emphasize environmental control as an integral part of asthma management; however, limited national-level data exist on how clinicians implement environmental control recommendations.

Objective

We analyzed data on clinicians' self-reported use of recommended environmental control practices in a nationally representative sample (n = 1645) of primary care physicians, asthma specialists, and advanced practice providers from the National Asthma Survey of Physicians, a supplemental questionnaire to the 2012 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

Methods

We examined clinician and practice characteristics as well as clinicians' decisions and strategies regarding environmental trigger assessment and environmental control across provider groups. Regression modeling was used to identify clinician and practice characteristics associated with implementation of guideline recommendations.

Results

A higher percentage of specialists assessed asthma triggers at home, school, and/or work than primary care or advanced practice providers (almost always: 53.6% vs 29.4% and 23.7%, respectively, P < .001). Almost all clinicians (>93%) recommended avoidance of secondhand tobacco smoke, whereas recommendations regarding cooking appliances (eg, proper ventilation) were infrequent. Although assessment and recommendation practices differed between clinician groups, modeling results showed that clinicians who reported almost always assessing asthma control were 5- to 6-fold more likely to assess environmental asthma triggers. Use of asthma action plans was also strongly associated with implementation of environmental control recommendations.

Conclusions

Environmental assessment and recommendations to patients varied among asthma care providers. High adherence to other key guideline components, such as assessing asthma control, was associated with environmental assessment and recommendation practices on environmental control.

Autism Spectrum Disorder: The New Asthma?

While autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has traditionally been diagnosed in specialty care, rising prevalence rates have strained specialist capacity and created significant diagnostic bottlenecks. With long wait times for specialist evaluations, pediatricians are increasingly being asked to play a greater role in identifying, diagnosing, and managing ASD within the medical home. In this commentary we draw parallels between the challenges pediatricians faced two decades ago learning how to manage pediatric asthma in the medical home, to those faced today in the field of primary care ASD management. Reflecting on the lessons learnt in primary care asthma management may help us construct a roadmap towards a higher and more consistent standard of ASD primary care for patients and their families.

Allergy clinics in times of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: an integrated model

BACKGROUND

Almost the entire World is experiencing the Coronavirus-Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, responsible, at the end of May 2020, of more than five million people infected worldwide and about 350,000 deaths. In this context, a deep reorganization of allergy clinics, in order to ensure proper diagnosis and care despite of social distancing measures expose, is needed.

MAIN TEXT

The reorganization of allergy clinics should include programmed checks for severe and poorly controlled patients, application of digital medicine service for mild-to-moderate disease in well-controlled ones, postponement of non urgent diagnostic work-ups and domiciliation of therapies, whenever possible. As far as therapies, allergen immunotherapy (AIT) should not be stopped and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) fits perfectly for this purpose, since a drug home-delivery service can be activated for the entire pandemic duration. Moreover, biologic agents for severe asthma, chronic spontaneous urticaria and atopic dermatitis should be particularly encouraged to achieve best control possible of severe disease in times of COVID-19 and, whenever possible, home-delivery and self-administration should be the preferred choice.

CONCLUSION

During COVID-19 pandemic, allergists have the responsibility of balancing individual patients' needs with public health issues, and innovative tools, such as telemedicine and digital medicine services, can be helpful to reduce the risk of viral spreading while delivering up-to-date personalized care.

Change in Inhaler Use, Lung Function, and Oxygenation in Association with Symptoms in COPD

Despite clinical guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients to self-treat worsening respiratory symptoms with supplemental inhaler/nebulizer use, few studies have investigated if symptom changes are associated with differences in oxygenation, lung function, or self-treatment. A total of 26 former smokers (mean age 72.7 ±7.5 years; 57.7% female) with COPD (≥ Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Stage 2) were followed for up to 4 months, during which they recorded daily oxygenation, lung function, and inhaler/nebulizer use. Differences in these health measures were assessed in association with self-reported worsening symptoms and COPD exacerbations, as defined by validated questionnaire. We collected 2451 observations with spirometry and questionnaire data and identified 253 symptom days (10.3%) and 47 (1.92%) exacerbation days. In linear mixed effects models adjusted for age, sex, race, height, weight, and season, each respiratory symptom reported worse than baseline was associated with a 0.19 percentage point (95% CI -0.31 to -0.07) lower daily oxygen saturation (p=0.002). On major symptom days (defined as worse-than-baseline dyspnea, sputum purulence or sputum amount), oxygen saturation was 0.56 percentage points lower (95% CI -0.89 to -0.23, p=0.001) than days without increased major symptoms. We found no association of symptom days or exacerbations with forced expiratory volume in 1 second. There were 8 reports of increased inhaler/nebulizer use from baseline on symptom days (1.5% of 253). In this moderate-to-severe COPD population, worsening respiratory symptoms were common and associated with lower oxygenation. However, participants did not self-treat symptoms with increased inhaler/nebulizer use, which may suggest poor perceived clinical benefit from short-acting bronchodilators and a potential target for patient education.

Does an Eczema Action Plan Improve Atopic Dermatitis? A Single-Site Randomized Controlled Trial

The multitude of treatment options for atopic dermatitis (AD) makes management frustrating for providers and patients. Eczema action plans (EAPs) have been proposed to improve parental and provider management. We developed a single-site randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of an EAP on quality of life (QOL), provider knowledge, and comfort with AD management. Providers were randomized into an EAP-use group and a traditional care group. All patients completed validated AD QOL surveys, and those with AD were verbally administered the survey 1 month later. Providers' perceptions on managing AD were compared in the EAP and usual use groups. Parents in the EAP group demonstrated a significantly increased understanding of AD treatment, and providers in the EAP group had a significantly increased understanding and management of AD. The EAP is a feasible tool that can be integrated into a busy clinic practice with a positive impact on physicians and patients.

Patient and Public Outreach Initiatives in Chronic Rhinosinusitis from the Canadian Sinusitis Working Group: Support for Affected Patients and Extending an Understanding of CRS to the General Public

Chronic rhinosinusitis is an important disease entity that affects patients worldwide, yet there is limited public awareness regarding the disease. The Canadian Rhinosinusitis Working Group, a group of diverse medical professionals, has made a multitude of efforts to help improve the health literacy of patients and important stakeholders, as well as the quality of life of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. This review will aim to outline these initiatives.

There is an "app" for that: Designing mobile phone technology to improve asthma action plan use in adolescent patients

PURPOSE

Asthma burden affects mortality, morbidity, quality of life, and the economy. Written asthma action plans are standard of care according to national guidelines, but these plans are often not prescribed. The purpose of this project was to develop an asthma action plan application for smartphones.

DATA SOURCES

A development studio was consulted for support in developing a smartphone application to code the software for the asthma action plan and assist in the design process. During development of the application, a survey was conducted to assist in design of the application and functionality.

CONCLUSIONS

All survey participants agreed that the application was easy to use, could be used without written instruction, and was designed for adolescents with asthma of any severity. Patients and providers mostly agreed that the app would help provide information about what to do in the event of an asthma exacerbation, and the application would be used frequently.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

There was consensus from both patients and providers that this application is not only functional but also helpful in the event of an asthma exacerbation. The project met the goal of designing a mobile phone application that would improve patient access to asthma action plans.

A Low-Literacy Asthma Action Plan to Improve Provider Asthma Counseling: A Randomized Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The use of written asthma action plans (WAAPs) has been associated with reduced asthma-related morbidity, but there are concerns about their complexity. We developed a health literacy-informed, pictogram- and photograph-based WAAP and examined whether providers who used it, with no training, would have better asthma counseling quality compared with those who used a standard plan.

METHODS

Physicians at 2 academic centers randomized to use a low-literacy or standard action plan (American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology) to counsel the hypothetical parent of child with moderate persistent asthma (regimen: Flovent 110 μg 2 puffs twice daily, Singulair 5 mg daily, Albuterol 2 puffs every 4 hours as needed). Two blinded raters independently reviewed counseling transcriptions.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

medication instructions presented with times of day (eg, morning and night vs number of times per day) and inhaler color; spacer use recommended; need for everyday medications, even when sick, addressed; and explicit symptoms used.

RESULTS

119 providers were randomly assigned (61 low literacy, 58 standard). Providers who used the low-literacy plan were more likely to use times of day (eg, Flovent morning and night, 96.7% vs 51.7%, P < .001; odds ratio [OR] = 27.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.1-123.4), recommend spacer use (eg, Albuterol, 83.6% vs 43.1%, P < .001; OR = 6.7; 95% CI, 2.9-15.8), address need for daily medications when sick (93.4% vs 34.5%, P < .001; OR = 27.1; 95% CI, 8.6-85.4), use explicit symptoms (eg, "ribs show when breathing," 54.1% vs 3.4%, P < .001; OR = 33.0; 95% CI, 7.4-147.5). Few mentioned inhaler color. Mean (SD) counseling time was similar (3.9 [2.5] vs 3.8 [2.6] minutes, P = .8).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a low-literacy WAAP improves the quality of asthma counseling by helping providers target key issues by using recommended clear communication principles.

Canadian paediatric asthma action plans and their correlation with current consensus guidelines

BACKGROUND

While written action plans are standard in the treatment and management of asthma, significant variability exists in the content and format among plans. This variability results in inconsistent educational messages that lend themselves to patient confusion and suboptimal health outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the content of Canadian paediatric written action plans for consistency in format, layout, zone-defining symptoms, suggested treatment options and adherence to current Canadian asthma care guidelines.

METHODS

Written action plans were sought from Canadian paediatric hospitals, major teaching hospitals associated with academic centres and three national organizations, for a total of 17 plans. An analysis was performed to assess the similarities and differences among plans.

RESULTS

Of all the Canadian paediatric written action plans, 76% were found to consist of three zones and 82% incorporated a traffic light-style design. The plans were divided between symptom-based (59%) and combined symptom- and peak-flow rate approaches (41%). Nominal concordance with the 2012 Canadian Thoracic Society guidelines existed with respect to inhaled corticosteroid and oral corticosteroid therapy. Considerable variability existed among the symptom descriptors that defined each zone. Greater consistency existed among treatment strategies, although the suggested treatment was often difficult to ascertain from the plan templates.

CONCLUSION

Canadian written action plans would be improved by nationally clarifying the symptom descriptors for each zone, adding asthma trigger information to the plans, increasing the emphasis of the common cold as a potential harbinger of worsening asthma symptoms and further incorporating national guideline recommendations.

Asthma self management in adults: a review of current literature

Self management programs for chronic conditions, such as asthma, have an important place in healthcare delivery. When properly implemented, they can curb the impact of disease and reduce both the high personal costs for individuals and significant financial costs for health care systems. The purpose of this review was to establish an understanding of current published literature on asthma self management programs in adults and to identify any reported attributes or components which serve to either assist or obstruct the uptake of self management strategies. Electronic data sources including Scopus, Proquest 5000, CINAHL, PubMed and Web of Science were accessed and literature searches were conducted using the key terms: asthma, chronic disease, self management, morbidity, quality of life, health outcomes, patient education and best practice. Inclusion criteria for the search included journal articles relating to adults with asthma published in English in peer reviewed journals from 1995 to 2011. Exclusion criteria included research targeting children, parents of children or families; and articles examining Asthma and COPD (or any other co-morbidity). Sixty four articles were included in this review due to their relevance to the major components of asthma self management, as defined by the Australian Asthma Management Handbook. A major conclusion from this review was that the uptake of asthma self management strategies is poor despite global recommendations for over twenty years; and that a likely reason for this is that generic asthma self management advice does not engage the individual with asthma.

The effectiveness of a pictorial asthma action plan for improving asthma control and the quality of life in illiterate women

BACKGROUND

Written asthma action plans are an important part of asthma management, but cannot be used for illiterate people.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to establish the effectiveness of a pictorial asthma action plan on asthma control, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and asthma morbidity in a population of illiterate women with asthma.

METHODS

Forty illiterate women with moderate-severe persistent asthma were assigned alternatively to receive either asthma education alone (control group) or asthma education and a pictorial asthma action plan (study group). Asthma control was assessed using the asthma control test (ACT), HRQoL was assessed using the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and the frequency of non-scheduled hospital or emergency visits was monitored.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients completed the study. The ACT and SGRQ scores of both groups improved at every follow-up time point compared with baseline (p < 0.001). The ACT scores at 1 month (22.44 versus 20.75, p = 0.034) and 2 months (23.28 versus 21.81, p = 0.010) were higher in the study group than in the control group, but this was not maintained at 6 months (24.00 versus 23.25, p = 0.069). The SGRQ scores at 6 months were better in the study group (18.12) than in the control group (23.96, p = 0.033). No hospital admissions were recorded for either group.

CONCLUSION

Education provides a significant improvement in asthma control and HRQoL while managing illiterate asthma patients, additionally the pictorial asthma action plan can be a helpful tool for self-medication.

How often do providers discuss asthma action plans with children? Analysis of transcripts of medical visits

OBJECTIVE

To examine how often providers discussed asthma action plans with children and their caregivers and child, clinical, and provider characteristics that were associated with those discussions.

METHOD

This was a cross-sectional analysis of audio-recorded visits between 35 general pediatric providers and 260 children (8-16 years old) with asthma and their caregivers. The visits were transcribed into text. The transcripts were coded for discussions about written asthma action plans.

RESULTS

Providers discussed written asthma action plans with 21.0% of children and caregivers. Providers were significantly more likely to discuss asthma action plans when the child was enrolled in Medicaid, the visit was asthma related, the visit was longer, the provider was not White, or more provider education.

CONCLUSION

In our sample, providers rarely discussed action plans with children and their caregivers. Providers should discuss asthma action plans with every child with persistent asthma and their caregivers and revise them regularly.

Enhancing school asthma action plans: qualitative results from southeast Minnesota beacon stakeholder groups

BACKGROUND

This study explores ways southeast Minnesota schools currently address asthma problems, identifies areas for improvement, and assesses the potential value of asthma action plans (AAPs) in schools.

METHODS

Focus groups were used to query stakeholder groups on asthma care in schools. Groups were held separately for elementary school personnel, parents of elementary school children with asthma, and health professionals (N = 103). Transcripts were analyzed by hand and by using NVivo 9 software.

RESULTS

Overall 103 stakeholders participated in focus groups. Major themes were (1) Communication; no uniform way of exchanging information between schools and health professionals. (2) Asthma Control Continuum; students require individualized instructions and information related to their asthma care. (3) Policy/Protocol; school staff roles and rules vary and are unclear. (4) Self-Reliance; older children self-manage their asthma and are unknown until they need emergent support. Solution recommended included AAPs used systematically with a method to communicate back from schools to physicians and parents.

CONCLUSIONS

The AAP may solve several of the school's concerns regarding their ability to provide asthma support in school. However, the AAP must reach the school, and that is currently not happening. In addition, schools would like tools and systems to assess asthma control and share information back with parents and physicians.

Readability, suitability, and characteristics of asthma action plans: examination of factors that may impair understanding

OBJECTIVE

Recognition of the complexity of asthma management has led to the development of asthma treatment guidelines that include the recommendation that all pediatric asthma patients receive a written asthma action plan. We assessed the readability, suitability, and characteristics of asthma action plans, elements that contribute to the effectiveness of action plan use, particularly for those with limited literacy.

METHODS

This was a descriptive study of 30 asthma action plans (27 state Department of Health (DOH)-endorsed, 3 national action plans endorsed by 6 states).

OUTCOME MEASURES

(1) readability (as assessed by Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Forcast), (2) suitability (Suitability Assessment of Materials [SAM], adequate: ≥ 0.4; unsuitable: <0.4), (3) action plan characteristics (peak flow vs symptom-based, symptoms, recommended actions).

RESULTS

Mean (SD) overall readability grade level was 7.2 (1.1) (range = 5.7-9.8); 70.0% were above a sixth-grade level. Mean (SD) suitability score was 0.74 (0.14). Overall, all action plans were found to be adequate, although 40.0% had an unsuitable score in at least 1 factor. The highest percent of unsuitable scores were found in the categories of layout/typography (30.0%), learning stimulation/motivation (26.7%), and graphics (13.3%). There were no statistically significant differences between the average grade level or SAM score of state DOH developed action plans and those from or adapted from national organizations. Plans varied with respect to terms used, symptoms included, and recommended actions.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific improvements in asthma action plans could maximize patient and parent understanding of appropriate asthma management and could particularly benefit individuals with limited literacy skills.

Asthma action plans are highly variable and do not conform to best visual design practices

BACKGROUND

Asthma action plans improve asthma outcomes and are recommended in guidelines. However, delivery by physicians and usage by patients remain low. This may be because of variability in existing plans and a failure to consider visual design and usability factors in plan development.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the variability in both the content and the format of existing plans, and the extent to which their format conforms to evidence-based visual design recommendations.

METHODS

We collected plans from the internet, Canadian experts and associations, guidelines, and published trials. We inductively developed analytic criteria for format and content analyses.

RESULTS

We collected 69 unique English or French-language adult outpatient plans from around the world. We found large variability in format, and plans fulfilled a mean of only 3.5 out of 8 evidence-based visual design recommendations. Content was also variable, including different descriptions of the baseline clinical state and descriptions and instructions at each "action point" (point recommending a change in treatment).

CONCLUSION

Existing plans vary widely in content and format. Accordingly, studies evaluating the effectiveness of action plans may not be directly comparable. Also, visual design may affect usability, uptake, and effectiveness. Our results suggest that this has not been adequately addressed in most plans, and design evidence and experts should be included in future development.

The asthma ePrompt: a novel electronic solution for chronic disease management

OBJECTIVE

This study tested the ability of an electronic prompt to promote an asthma assessment during primary care visits.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study of all eligible adult patients with previously diagnosed asthma in three geographically distinct ambulatory family medicine clinics within a 4-month period. The usual clinic visit process was performed at two geographically distinct control sites (n = 75 and n = 55 patients, respectively). The intervention group site (n = 64) had an electronic flag embedded in the Patient Check-in Locator field which prompted the distribution of a self-administered Asthma Management Questionnaire (AMQ) in the waiting room. The primary outcome measure was a documented asthma severity assessment.

RESULTS

The front desk distributed the AMQ successfully in 100% of possible opportunities and the AMQ was completed by 84% of patients. Providers in the intervention group were significantly more likely than providers in the two non-intervention groups to document asthma severity in the medical record during a non-asthma ambulatory clinic visit (63.3% vs. 18.7% vs. 3.6%; p < .001).

CONCLUSION

The provision of standardized asthma information triggered by an electronic prompt at the time of check-in effectively initiates an asthma assessment during the primary care visits.

Comparative effectiveness of asthma interventions within a practice based research network

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a chronic lung disease that affects more than 23 million people in the United States, including 7 million children. Asthma is a difficult to manage chronic condition associated with disparities in health outcomes, poor medical compliance, and high healthcare costs. The research network coordinating this project includes hospitals, urgent care centers, and outpatient clinics within Carolinas Healthcare System that share a common electronic medical record and billing system allowing for rapid collection of clinical and demographic data. This study investigates the impact of three interventions on clinical outcomes for patients with asthma. Interventions are: an integrated approach to care that incorporates asthma management based on the chronic care model; a shared decision making intervention for asthma patients in underserved or disadvantaged populations; and a school based care approach that examines the efficacy of school-based programs to impact asthma outcomes including effectiveness of linkages between schools and the healthcare providers.

METHODS/DESIGN

This study will include 95 Practices, 171 schools, and over 30,000 asthmatic patients. Five groups (A-E) will be evaluated to determine the effectiveness of three interventions. Group A is the usual care control group without electronic medical record (EMR). Group B practices are a second control group that has an EMR with decision support, asthma action plans, and population reports at baseline. A time delay design during year one converts practices in Group B to group C after receiving the integrated approach to care intervention. Four practices within Group C will receive the shared decision making intervention (and become group D). Group E will receive a school based care intervention through case management within the schools. A centralized database will be created with the goal of facilitating comparative effectiveness research on asthma outcomes specifically for this study. Patient and community level analysis will include results from patient surveys, focus groups, and asthma patient density mapping. Community variables such as income and housing density will be mapped for comparison. Outcomes to be measured are reduced hospitalizations and emergency department visits; improved adherence to medication; improved quality of life; reduced school absenteeism; improved self-efficacy and improved school performance.

DISCUSSION

Identifying new mechanisms that improve the delivery of asthma care is an important step towards advancing patient outcomes, avoiding preventable Emergency Department visits and hospitalizations, while simultaneously reducing overall healthcare costs.