A review of pharmacologic strategies for switching to atypical antipsychotics

Association of antipsychotic treatment switching in patients with schizophrenia, bipolar, and major depressive disorders

Aims: To evaluate the association of relapse and healthcare resource utilization in patients with schizophrenia (SZ), bipolar disorder (BD), or major depressive disorder (MDD) who switched antipsychotic medication versus those who did not.Materials and methods: Medicaid claims from six US states spanning six years were retrospectively analyzed for antipsychotic switching versus non-switching. For all patients with SZ, BD, or MDD, and for the subset of patients who also had ≥1 extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) diagnosis at baseline, times to the following outcomes were analyzed: underlying disease relapse, other psychiatric relapse, all-cause emergency room (ER) visit, all-cause inpatient (IP) admission, and EPS diagnosis.Results: Switchers (N = 10,548) had a shorter time to disease relapse, other psychiatric relapse, IP admissions, ER visits, and EPS diagnosis (all, log-rank p < .001) than non-switchers (N = 31,644). Switchers reached the median for IP admission (21.50 months) vs non-switchers (not reached) and for ER visits (switchers, 9.07 months; non-switchers, 13.35 months). For disease relapse, other psychiatric relapse, and EPS diagnosis, <50% of patients had an event during the two-year study period. Subgroup analysis of those with ≥1 EPS diagnosis revealed similar associations.Limitations: Only association, not causation, may be inferred, and there may be differences between the patient groups in parameters not evaluated.Conclusions: These results show that disease and other psychiatric relapse, all-cause ER visits, IP admissions, and EPS diagnosis occurred earlier for patients who switched antipsychotics than for those who did not, suggesting that switching is associated with an increased risk of relapse in patients with SZ, BD, and MDD. This may be attributed to more-severely ill patients being less responsive than those with less-severe illness, which, in turn, may require more episodes of switching.

Functional Recovery in Major Depressive Disorder: Providing Early Optimal Treatment for the Individual Patient

Major depressive disorder is an often chronic and recurring illness. Left untreated, major depressive disorder may result in progressive alterations in brain morphometry and circuit function. Recent findings, however, suggest that pharmacotherapy may halt and possibly reverse those effects. These findings, together with evidence that a delay in treatment is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, underscore the urgency of rapidly treating depression to full recovery. Early optimized treatment, using measurement-based care and customizing treatment to the individual patient, may afford the best possible outcomes for each patient. The aim of this article is to present recommendations for using a patient-centered approach to rapidly provide optimal pharmacological treatment to patients with major depressive disorder. Offering major depressive disorder treatment determined by individual patient characteristics (e.g., predominant symptoms, medical history, comorbidities), patient preferences and expectations, and, critically, their own definition of wellness provides the best opportunity for full functional recovery.

Diabetes and Cardiovascular Care Among People with Severe Mental Illness: A Literature Review

Close to 19 million US adults have severe mental illnesses (SMI), and they die, on average, 25 years earlier than the general population, most often from cardiovascular disease (CVD). Many of the antipsychotic medications used to treat SMI contribute to CVD risk by increasing risk for obesity, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. Based on compelling evidence, the American Diabetes Association and the American Psychiatric Association developed guidelines for metabolic screening and monitoring during use of these medications.In this manuscript, we have reviewed the evidence on diabetes and other CVD risk screening, prevalence, and management among populations with SMI. We also review differences in screening among subpopulations with SMI (e.g., racial/ethnic minorities, women, and children). We found that despite national guidelines for screening for diabetes and other cardiovascular risk factors, up to 70 % of people taking antipsychotics remain unscreened and untreated. Based on estimates that 20 % of the 19 million US adults with SMI have diabetes and 70 % of them are not screened; it is likely that over 2 million Americans with SMI have unidentified diabetes. Given that undiagnosed diabetes costs over $4,000 per person, this failure to identify diabetes among people with SMI represents a missed opportunity to prevent morbidity and translates to over $8 billion in annual preventable costs to our healthcare system.Given the high burden of disease and significant evidence of suboptimal medical care received by people with SMI, we propose several clinical and policy recommendations to improve diabetes and other CVD risk screening and care for this highly vulnerable population. These recommendations include reducing antipsychotic medication dose or switching antipsychotic medications, enhancing smoking cessation efforts, sharing electronic health records between physical and mental health care systems, and promoting integration of care.

Effectiveness and tolerability of switching to aripiprazole from risperidone in subjects with autism spectrum disorders: a prospective open-label study

BACKGROUND

Subjects with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) often exhibit behavioral symptoms such as aggressiveness and irritability. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and the tolerability of aripiprazole switched from risperidone in children and adolescents with ASD.

METHODS

This prospective, 12-week, open-label study included 9 male subjects with ASD (age range, 9-22 years; mean ± SD age, 14.8 ± 4.0 years) followed up for 12 weeks after switching to aripiprazole from risperidone. The primary outcome measures were the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scales and the irritability subscale of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD maintenance dosages of risperidone and aripiprazole were 0.6 ± 0.4 mg/d and 4.8 ± 4.0 mg/d, respectively. The mean ± SD scores of the irritability subscale of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist before switching to aripiprazole (baseline) and 12 weeks after switching to aripiprazole (end point) were 14.8 ± 7.6 and 13.1 ± 8.0, respectively. The mean ± SD Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score, a comparison from baseline to end point, was 2.4 ± 0.7. Mild somnolence was observed only in 1 subject. No significant changes in vital signs, weight, electrocardiogram, or laboratory measures occurred during switching to aripiprazole. Serum prolactin levels decreased significantly from 17.3 ± 9.4 ng/mL (baseline) to 2.3 ± 1.7 ng/mL (end point).

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that aripiprazole might be generally well tolerated and might constitute an alternative treatment of subjects with ASD who experience poor efficacy or tolerability issues with risperidone treatment. Additional long-term controlled studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of switching to aripiprazole from other antipsychotics in subjects with ASD.

Switching to ziprasidone in the clinical practice setting: an open-label study

OBJECTIVE

This observational study evaluates the long-term outcome of switching to ziprasidone in patients with schizophrenia in the clinical practice setting.

METHODS

Patients (208) with schizophrenia who had been switched to ziprasidone monotherapy due to partial response or tolerability problems were followed for 1 year. Efficacy was assessed at baseline and months 1, 3, and 12 with Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Clinical Global Impression-severity (CGI-S), and CGI-improvement. Quality of life, functionality, and safety measures, including metabolic parameters, were also assessed; 195 subjects comprised the per protocol analysis population.

RESULTS

A reduction > or = 30% in BPRS total score was observed in 42.5% of the subjects. Mean scores of the BPRS (global and positive and negative clusters), CGI-S and CGI-I significantly decreased at endpoint (p < 0.001). Ziprasidone treatment was also associated with statistically significant improvements in the GAF, WHO-DAS-II, and SF-12. After 1-year follow-up, a mean weight decrease of -1.6 kg (p < 0.05) was observed. Mean levels of LDL cholesterol and triglycerides also decreased (p < 0.01) while HDL cholesterol levels increased (p < 0.05) at endpoint. No significant changes in mean glucose levels at study end were detected.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that switching to ziprasidone is effective and well tolerated in patients with schizophrenia requiring a change in antipsychotic medication.

Long-acting Injectable Antipsychotics in First-episode Schizophrenia

Antipsychotic medications are important for the successful management of schizophrenia. Continuous treatment with medication is superior in relapse prevention and non-adherence to antipsychotic medication is associated with a poor clinical outcome. Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) that can guarantee adherence to a treatment regimen could be a useful treatment option. With the introduction of second-generation atypical antipsychotics-long acting injection (SGA-LAI), the risks for extrapyramidal adverse events are decreased. The indications for SGA-LAI have been extended from chronic, stabilized patients to acute psychotic patients. Some studies investigated the use of LAI in first-episode schizophrenia patients and raised the possibility of prescribing LAI as a treatment option. However, there is still limited research using LAI in first-episode schizophrenia. More well-designed, randomized, controlled clinical trials using SGA-LAIs in first episode schizophrenia are needed. Additionally, studies on side effects of SGA-LAI in long-term use are required prior to recommending LAI for patients with first episode schizophrenia.

The effect of paliperidone extended release on subjective well-being and responses in patients with schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the subjective well-being and attitudes toward antipsychotic medication of patients with schizophrenia who had switched to paliperidone extended release (ER).

METHODS

A total of 291 patients with schizophrenia treated with antipsychotics participated in this open-label, 24-week switching study. The primary outcome measures were the Subjective Well-Being under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale-short version (SWN-K) and the Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI). The Krawiecka scale, Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia (CGI-SCH), Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP) were used to evaluate psychopathology and psychosocial functioning, respectively.

RESULTS

Data from a total of 243 subjects who received the study medication and had at least one follow-up assessment without a major protocol violation were analyzed. Scores on the DAI and SWN-K showed significant improvement between baseline and end-point measurements beginning during the second week. Scores on the Krawiecka scale, all five subscales of the CGI-SCH scale, and the PSP scale were also significantly improved at the end point compared with the baseline. Significant predictors of improvements in the SWN-K and DAI after a switch to paliperidone ER were baseline scores, reductions in scores on the Krawiecka scale, and previous risperidone use. A clinically relevant increase in body weight (≥7% weight gain) occurred in one-fourth of the participants who completed the 24-week study.

CONCLUSION

Switching to paliperidone ER improved the subjective well-being and attitudes towards antipsychotic medication in patients with schizophrenia. Exploratory analyses revealed that these improvements were particularly pronounced in patients who had been treated with risperidone before treatment with paliperidone ER.

Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) as a valid proxy measure for remission in schizophrenia: analyses of ziprasidone clinical study data

OBJECTIVE

To determine the degree to which a proxy measure of remission in schizophrenia correlates with the criteria identified by the Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group, and how well early treatment response to ziprasidone predicts remission.

METHODS

Data from 10 ziprasidone studies were analyzed to determine rates of remission achieved with ziprasidone using a remission definition of Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) of 1, and compared with rates of remission achieved using the remission working group criteria. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) scores were then investigated as predictors of remission.

RESULTS

A CGI-I score of 1 correlated with the remission criteria developed by the remission working group. In the combined ziprasidone arms, BPRS scores at Weeks 1, 3, and 4 successfully predicted PANSS remission (p<0.01) and BPRS remission (p<0.0001) at study endpoint (44-196weeks). PANSS scores (at Weeks 1, 3, and 4) successfully predicted PANSS remission (p<0.01) at study endpoint. PANSS scores at Week 3 successfully predicted BPRS remission (p=0.02) at study endpoint. A CGI-I score of 1 or 2 at Week 1 also successfully predicted remission in schizophrenia.

CONCLUSION

The findings show a correlation between clinical and research scales (remission working group criteria) for the assessment of remission in schizophrenia. This proxy measure for the assessment of remission should be easy to apply in a clinical setting and facilitates the prediction of remission in schizophrenia.

Experience with injectable long-acting risperidone in long-term therapy after an acute episode of schizophrenia: the SPHERE Study

BACKGROUND

Risperidone long-acting injectable (RLAI) is the first long-acting formulation of an atypical antipsychotic introduced into clinical practice. RLAI combines the benefits of atypical antipsychotic agents with an extended duration of activity and is intended for long-term management of schizophrenia. This study evaluated the use of RLAI as part of a long-term management strategy in patients with an acute episode of schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to determine clinicians' approaches to the use of RLAI in patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia by examining the prescribing patterns of antipsychotic and other psychotropic medications. Other objectives were to evaluate the overall safety of switching patients to RLAI from previous antipsychotic therapy and to determine patients', caregivers' and relatives' attitudes towards RLAI treatment.

METHODS

The Safety and Profile of Handling and Employing of Risperdal Consta in Emergency/Acute Care Settings (SPHERE) study was an observational, non-interventional, multicenter, retrospective study involving a large cohort of patients with acute psychotic exacerbation who attended Spanish emergency/acute care facilities (between August and December 2003) and were treated with RLAI during hospitalization.

RESULTS

A total of 1232 patients (70% men; mean age 37 years; median of 8 months since most recent admission) were included in the analyses; 79% had been receiving antipsychotic therapy prior to admission. All patients received RLAI post-stabilization. The main reasons for initiating RLAI were the need for long-term treatment (76%) and a low adherence to previous treatment (71%). RLAI doses administered during hospitalization were: 25 (26%), 37.5 (29%), 50 (42%) and 75-100 mg (3%). The mean number of injections per patient (2 +/- 1) and mean hospitalization time (25 +/- 16 days) indicated that RLAI was administered every 2 weeks as per the manufacturer's recommendations. All patients were discharged on RLAI treatment; 62% were prescribed concomitant therapy, mainly oral risperidone (39%), anxiolytics (25%), antiparkinsonians (15%), hypnotics (11%) and anticonvulsants (11%). Only 5.7% of patients reported adverse events, most commonly extrapyramidal symptoms (1.1%) and somnolence (0.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

As part of a long-term management strategy aimed at improving treatment adherence in schizophrenic patients, RLAI was prescribed to a wide spectrum of patients with an acute episode of schizophrenia during hospitalization and at the time of discharge from emergency/acute care facilities. RLAI was well tolerated in the study population and the overall impression of patients, primary caregivers and relatives to RLAI therapy was positive.

Assessment of clinical and metabolic status, and subjective well-being, in schizophrenic patients switched from typical and atypical antipsychotics to ziprasidone

The objective of this paper was to assess the effects of switching from typical and/or atypical antipsychotics to ziprasidone, owing to inadequate response or intolerance, in chronic schizophrenic patients. A total of 312 patients were switched to an 8-week, open-label, flexible dose (40-160 mg/day) of ziprasidone. Psychiatric status was evaluated by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Clinical Global Impression Severity scale. Other measures included functioning, subjective response and attitude toward therapy, and cognition. Laboratory tests and electrocardiography with QTc interval were carried out. Extrapyramidal symptoms and sexual dysfunction symptoms were also assessed. Of the 312 enrolled patients, 73.1% completed the study. Olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol were the most common psychotropic drugs taken before entry. Poor efficacy was the main reason for change in therapy. Significant improvements from baseline to endpoint were reported for mean Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores (P<0.0001), Clinical Global Impression Severity (P<0.0001), Global Assessment of Functioning (P<0.0001), Subjective Well-being scores (P<0.0001), and Trail Making Test (P<0.05). Significant improvements were also found for mean Simpson-Angus scale score (P<0.0001), sexual dysfunction, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides. In addition, mean body weight significantly decreased from baseline (P<0.0001). A favorable profile for ziprasidone was found with regard to improved subjective tolerability, quality of life, and medication adherence behavior.

Clinical consequences of switching antipsychotic drugs in outpatients with schizophrenia: 36-month results from the European Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes study

Data from the European Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes, a 3-year, prospective, observational study of health outcomes associated with antipsychotic treatment in outpatients with schizophrenia (n=10 972 enrolled), were used to assess the impact of the first switching of antipsychotic medications, with a focus on olanzapine, on clinical status and tolerability outcomes. Patients were defined as those who (1) started olanzapine at baseline and changed treatment; (2) started another antipsychotic at baseline and changed to olanzapine; and (3) changed from and to a non-olanzapine antipsychotic. A logistic regression model was used to analyse the impact of switching on treatment response and tolerability. Patients switching from olanzapine were less likely to respond than patients switching to olanzapine (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.40, 0.87). Patients who switched from olanzapine and those who switched neither from nor to olanzapine were more likely to have extrapyramidal symptoms (OR: 3.79; 95% CI: 2.02, 7.10 and OR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.23, 3.86, respectively) and loss of libido (OR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.21, 2.96 and OR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.04, 2.35, respectively) compared with patients who switched from another antipsychotic to olanzapine. Patients who switched to olanzapine experienced a higher weight gain. In conclusion, among patients switching antipsychotic medication, those who switched to olanzapine had better long-term outcomes.