Impact of surgical approach on postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing gastrectomy: laparoscopic versus open approaches

Preoperative cognitive function as a risk factor of postoperative delirium in cancer surgeries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Postoperative delirium (POD) after cancer surgeries can be a result of chemo brain, anesthesia, surgery duration, and preoperative cognitive impairment. Although older age and preoperative cognitive dysfunction were reported to increase the risk of POD in noncardiac surgery, the role of preoperative cognitive function and age in the development of POD after all types of cancer surgeries is not clear. This study aimed to determine the relationship between preoperative cognitive function and likelihood of POD after cancer surgeries. This study used three main online databases and followed PRISMA guidelines. English language original articles that examined preoperative cognitive function before solid tumor cancer surgery and assessed patients for postoperative delirium were included. We employed the random effect meta-analysis method. The overall incidence of POD ranged from 8.7% to 50.9%. The confusion assessment method was the most common tool used to assess delirium. Mini-mental state evaluation (MMSE), Mini-cog, and Montreal cognitive assessment were the most common tools to assess cognitive function. The pooled (total observation = 4676) random effects SMD was estimated at -0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.30 to -0.31), indicating that lower MMSE scores before surgery are associated with a higher risk of POD. The pooled (total observation = 2668) random effects OR was estimated at 5.17 (95% CI: 2.51 to -10.63), indicating preoperative cognitive dysfunction can significantly predict the occurrence of POD after cancer surgeries. In conclusion, preoperative cognitive function is an independent and significant predictor of POD after solid tumor cancer surgeries.

Update of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine evidence-based and consensus-based guideline on postoperative delirium in adult patients

Postoperative delirium (POD) remains a common, dangerous and resource-consuming adverse event but is often preventable. The whole peri-operative team can play a key role in its management. This update to the 2017 ESAIC Guideline on the prevention of POD is evidence-based and consensus-based and considers the literature between 01 April 2015, and 28 February 2022. The search terms of the broad literature search were identical to those used in the first version of the guideline published in 2017. POD was defined in accordance with the DSM-5 criteria. POD had to be measured with a validated POD screening tool, at least once per day for at least 3 days starting in the recovery room or postanaesthesia care unit on the day of surgery or, at latest, on postoperative day 1. Recent literature confirmed the pathogenic role of surgery-induced inflammation, and this concept reinforces the positive role of multicomponent strategies aimed to reduce the surgical stress response. Although some putative precipitating risk factors are not modifiable (length of surgery, surgical site), others (such as depth of anaesthesia, appropriate analgesia and haemodynamic stability) are under the control of the anaesthesiologists. Multicomponent preoperative, intra-operative and postoperative preventive measures showed potential to reduce the incidence and duration of POD, confirming the pivotal role of a comprehensive and team-based approach to improve patients' clinical and functional status.

Incidence of delirium in older people with cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Delirium is a prevalent neuropsychiatric syndrome in older people with cancer. However, there are no meta-analyses assessing its incidence exclusively in this population. This study aims to assess the incidence proportion of delirium in older people with cancer in the hospital area.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out. MEDLINE, Scopus, and EBSCO were searched from inception to December 2021. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Inclusion criteria were original peer-reviewed studies with experimental (randomised controlled trials), observational, and cross-sectional designs assessing delirium older inpatients (≥65 years) with oncological diseases in medical and post-surgical hospital areas and using validated screening or diagnostic methods. A web-based system was used to manage the screening process. Study quality was assessed with Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools. The statistical analysis was performed in RevMan v5.4.0 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK), using a random-effects model to calculate incidence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Based on 37 included articles, the incidence proportion of delirium ranged from 3.8% to 61.4%, in a total of 11,847 older patients with cancer. Meta-analysis showed a pooled incidence of 22.6% (95% confidence interval 18.5%, 26.7%; I2 = 97%, p < 0.001). The main tools for detection were the Diagnostic Statistical Manual criteria and the Confusion Assessment Methods scale.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence proportion of delirium in older inpatients with cancer is 22.6%. Incidence in the medical setting was higher than in the post-surgical areas. There is a need for high-quality studies examining delirium in older people with cancer.

Preoperative Risk Factors Associated with Increased Incidence of Postoperative Delirium: Systematic Review of Qualified Clinical Studies

Postoperative delirium (POD) is an acute alteration of mental state, characterized by reduced awareness and attention, occurring up to five postoperative days after recovery from anesthesia. Several original studies and reviews have identified possible perioperative POD risk factors; however, there is no comprehensive review of the preoperative risk factors in patients diagnosed with POD using only validated diagnostic scales. The aim of this systematic review was to report the preoperative risk factors associated with an increased incidence of POD in patients undergoing non-cardiac and non-brain surgery. The reviewed studies included original research papers that used at least one validated diagnostic scale to identify POD occurrence for more than 24 h. A total of 6475 references were retrieved from the database search, with only 260 of them being suitable for further review. Out of the 260 reviewed studies, only 165 that used a validated POD scale reported one or more preoperative risk factors. Forty-one risk factors were identified, with various levels of statistical significance. The extracted risk factors could serve as a preoperative POD risk assessment workup. Future studies dedicated to the further evaluation of the specific preoperative risk factors' contributions to POD could help with the development of a weighted screening tool.

The Assessment of Immediate Postoperative Delirium in Neurologically Intact Adult Patients Admitted to the Post-anesthesia Care Unit: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background

Immediate postoperative delirium (IPD) in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) can cause significant morbidity affecting everyday activities and length of stay with cost implications. This study was undertaken to find the proportion of IPD in PACU and its association with anesthesia and other perioperative factors.

Methods

After obtaining ethical approval and informed consent, this cross-sectional study was conducted in the PACU. A total of 600 consecutive adult patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1-3) posted for surgery were approached between January and March 2019, of which 402 patients without neurological diseases and language and hearing discrepancies were studied. All patients had the intervention of surgery under anesthesia in a usual manner. Delirium was assessed preoperatively, postoperatively at 15 and 30 minutes, and before discharge from the PACU. IPD was assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) score, while sedation/agitation was assessed using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). The primary outcomes were the proportion of IPD, association with anesthesia, and perioperative risk factors. The secondary outcomes were the length of stay, delirium treatment, and mortality.

Results

Overall, the IPD proportion was 14.7%. A significant association was demonstrated with premedication with midazolam (odds ration (OR): 3.2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.42-7.35; P=0.003), general anesthesia (GA) (OR: 6.3; 95% CI: 2.23-17.8; P<0.001), duration of anesthesia (126 versus 95 minutes; P=0.001), laparoscopic mode of surgical access (OR: 3.4; 95% CI: 1.8-6.4; P<0.001), and postoperative RASS >/< 0 (OR: 10.6; 95% CI: 4.69-24.11; P<0.001) at 30 minutes and before discharge from the PACU. Multivariate analysis showed the strongest association of RASS at 30 minutes with IPD.

Conclusion

The proportion of IPD was found to be 14.7% in this study, and the chances of developing IPD are high if the patient is not awake and calm in the PACU, especially if midazolam is administered as premedication, followed by general anesthesia (GA) for a long duration.

Mechanical Bowel Preparation Is a Risk Factor for Postoperative Delirium as It Alters the Gut Microbiota Composition: A Prospective Randomized Single-Center Study

Background and Objective

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a frequent complication in patients undergoing gastrectomy. Increasing evidence suggests that abnormal gut microbiota composition may contribute to its morbidity. However, it is unclear whether mechanical bowel preparation would cause postoperative delirium by altering the gut microbiota of patients. This study aimed to investigate the association between mechanical bowel preparation and postoperative delirium in patients undergoing gastrectomy.

Methods

A prospective randomized single-center study was performed. A total of 81 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups: preparation group and non-preparation group according to whether the patient received MBP before surgery. To diagnose postoperative delirium, we used the 3-Min Diagnostic Interview for Confusion Assessment Method-defined delirium for five successive days after surgery. 16s rRNA gene sequencing was used to investigate changes in the intestinal bacteria. The linear discriminant analysis and effect size (LefSe) analysis were also used to identify the different taxa of fecal microbiota between the postoperative delirium and non-postoperative delirium groups.

Results

We found that there was a significant difference in β-diversity of the gut microbiota between the preparation group and non-preparation group (P = 0.048). Furthermore, patients in the preparation group had a much higher rate of postoperative delirium (13/40, 32.5%) compared with that in non-preparation groups (4/41, 9.8%). Multivariate regression analysis adjusted by other risk factors indicated that mechanical bowel preparation was associated with the occurrence of delirium (odds ratio = 4.792; 95% confidence interval: 1.274–18.028; P = 0.020). When comparing the gut microbiota of patients with and without POD, Bacteroides and Veillonella (genus), which were higher in the preparation group, were also higher in delirium patients (P < 0.05). Genus Olsenella was both relatively higher in the non-preparation group and non-POD group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Mechanical bowel preparation not only altered the gut microbiota composition of patients with gastric cancer but also increased the incidence of postoperative delirium. Among all the gut microbiota altered by mechanical bowel preparation, Bacteroides and Veillonella genus might be a risk factor of POD. Genus Olsenella might be a beneficial bacteria to reduce the incidence of POD.

Preoperative Status of Gut Microbiota Predicts Postoperative Delirium in Patients With Gastric Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Post-operative delirium (POD) is a serious complication which occurs after surgery, especially in the elderly undergoing abdominal surgery. Increasing evidence has revealed an association between the gut microbiota and psychological disorders involving the "brain-gut" axis. However, the association between the pathogenesis of POD after abdominal surgery in aging and composition of the gut microbiota remains unclear.

METHODS

Forty patients (≥65 years old) who underwent abdominal surgery were included in the study. Twenty patients had POD, whereas 20 patients did not. POD was diagnosed and assessed using the confusion assessment method (CAM) during the postoperative period. Total DNA fractions were extracted from all fecal samples of patients. 16S rRNA sequencing was performed to determine the composition of the gut microbiota. The quality of the samples was determined by calculating the α- and β-diversities.

RESULTS

The α- and β-diversities indicated that the samples were eligible for detection and comparison. We observed multiple differentially abundant bacteria in patients with and without POD. Generally, Proteobacteria, Enterbacteriaceae, Escherichia shigella, Klebsiella, Ruminococcus, Roseburia, Blautia, Holdemanella, Anaerostipes, Burkholderiaceae, Peptococcus, Lactobacillus, and Dorea were abundant in the POD cohort, whereas Streptococcus equinus and Blautia hominis were abundant in the control cohort. The results of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of Escherichia shigella was 0.75. Phenotype prediction showed that the gut microbiota may influence POD by altering the tolerance to oxidative stress.

CONCLUSION

There were significant associations between the pathogenesis of POD and composition of the gut microbiota. Escherichia shigella are promising diagnostic bacterial species for predicting POD onset after abdominal surgery in elderly people.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx, Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR200030131.

Consistent patterns in the inconsistent associations of Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), C-Reactive Protein (C-RP) and Interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels with delirium in surgical populations. A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Biomarkers for delirium could increase diagnostic accuracy and may help to identify pathological pathways. Until now study findings concerning cytokine levels have been inconsistent.

AIMS

Systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the association between peripheral levels of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1), C-Reactive Protein (C-RP) and Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and delirium in surgical patients, and to explore if there are distinct/specific patterns that may potentially explain inconsistent results.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were: prospective studies, surgical populations excluding preoperative delirium, available data. The following were collected: type of operation (orthopaedic, abdominal, etc), the timing of operation (acute, elective, both), demographics, number of participants with delirium, time of preoperative blood withdrawal, and preoperative levels of each biomarker.

RESULTS

Low levels of IGF-1 (n = 7 studies) are significantly associated with post-operative delirium in abdominal surgical samples. High levels of C-RP (n = 9) are associated with delirium in acute orthopaedic and elective abdominal operations. IL-6 (n = 14) is a significant predictor of post-operative delirium in a variety of surgical conditions (elective or acute).

DISCUSSION

A common pattern exists in the otherwise conflicting reported findings. This similarity may reflect different underling mechanisms and predisposing factors like cachexia and catabolic stages. It seems that delirium in abdominal surgery is triggered by IGF-1 disturbances, while in other surgeries by an inflammatory reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the contradictory results concerning the association of IGF-1, C-RP and IL-6 with postoperative delirium, the present meta-analysis shows that there are certain patterns. IL-6 seems a consistent predictor for delirium in surgical samples.

Body mass index affects postoperative daily activities of older patients after gastrectomy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the impact of preoperative body mass index (BMI) on postoperative activities of daily living (ADL) and clinical outcomes in older patients who underwent curative gastrectomy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study using a nationwide inpatient database in Japan. The study included 1769 patients with gastric cancer, aged ≥ 65 years old, who underwent gastrectomy. BMI was defined as per the World Health Organization classifications for Asian populations. Primary outcome was ADL at discharge, assessed by Barthel index. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Patients analyzed included 890 (50.3%) aged 65-74 years, 745 (42.1%) aged 75-84 years, and 134 (7.6%) aged ≥ 85 years; 71.5% were male. According to BMI classification, 11.9% patients were considered underweight (< 18.5 kg/m²), 46.7% were in the standard range (18.5 to < 23 kg/m²), 34.1% were classified as overweight (23-27.5 kg/m²), and 7.3% were in the obese group (≥ 27.5 kg/m²). In multivariate analysis, a significant association was observed between BMI and Barthel index scores (underweight group: standardized coefficient, - 0.040; compared with standard group; p = 0.013), postoperative complication (obese group: odds ratio, 1.562; compared with standard group; p = 0.034), and length of hospital stay (obese group: standardized coefficient, 0.047; compared with standard group; p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Perioperative management with a focus on BMI is important in older patients undergoing elective curative gastrectomy.

Risk factors of elderly patients with postoperative delirium following major abdominal surgery for cancer

Purpose

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common complication in elderly patients after major abdominal surgery for cancer. Although POD is related with a poor outcome, there have not been many reports about POD after abdominal surgery in Korea. The aims of study were to analyze the characteristics and surgical outcomes of elderly patients with POD and to identify the risk factors of POD.

Methods

From November 2016 to January 2019, we prospectively enrolled 63 patients who were aged ≥75 years and underwent major abdominal surgery for cancer. POD was daily assessed for up to 10 days postoperatively with the Confusion Assessment Method and a validated chart review.

Results

POD occurred in eight patients (12.7%). Univariate analysis showed that the occurrence of POD was related to sodium <135 mEq/L (P=0.037), combined resection (P=0.023), longer surgery/anesthesia time (P=0.023 and P=0.037, respectively), increased blood loss (P=0.004), postoperative admission to intensive care unit (ICU) (P=0.023), and duration of Foley catheter (P=0.011), however, multivariate analysis identified no significant risk factors of POD. There was no difference in postoperative outcomes such as hospital stay, mortality, reoperation, and morbidity between patients with POD and without POD.

Conclusion

Elderly patients with hyponatremia, combined resection, longer operation/anesthesia time and admission to ICU had tendencies to develop POD after major abdominal surgery. Surgeons should pay more attention to prevent POD, and a large-scale prospective study is needed to identify the risk factors of POD.

Risk factors for postoperative delirium in elderly patients after spinal fusion surgery

Background

Postoperative delirium (POD) has an incidence rate of 9% to 41%. It is directly linked to decreasing cognitive function, increasing length of hospitalization and cost, as well as other complications and mortality. We aimed to assess the risk factors for POD among elderly patients by analyzing data from those who underwent spinal surgery.

Methods

This study included 446 patients aged 65 years or older who underwent spinal surgery at our institution between March 2013 and May 2018. Data were collected retrospectively from the patients' electronic medical records, and logistic regression was used to identify the risk factors associated with POD. The diagnosis of POD was based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, and was made through consultation with a psychiatrist during postoperative hospitalization and before discharge.

Results

Seventy-eight (78/446, 17.4%) patients were diagnosed with POD. The most relevant risk factor for POD was preoperative cognitive dysfunction (odds ratio [OR], 4.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60 to 11.93; P = 0.004), followed by emergency surgery (OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.27 to 5.74; P = 0.01), age (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.26; P < 0.001), and anesthesia time (OR, 1.01; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.01; P = 0.002).

Conclusions

Preoperative cognitive dysfunction, emergency surgery, age, and anesthesia time were factors that affected POD occurrence after spinal surgery. Patients with such associated factors may be at a higher risk for POD when undergoing spinal surgery, and hence, careful management may be necessary for these patients.

Preoperative Circulating MiR-210, a Risk Factor for Postoperative Delirium Among Elderly Patients with Gastric Cancer Undergoing Curative Resection

BACKGROUND

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a very common complication in elderly patients with gastric cancer (GC) and associated with poor prognosis. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) serve as key post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression via targeting mRNAs and play important roles in the nervous system. This study aimed to investigate the potential predictive role of miRNAs for POD.

METHODS

Elderly GC patients who were scheduled to undergo elective curative resection were consequently enrolled in this study. POD was assessed at 1 day before surgery and 1-7 days after surgery following the guidance of the 5th edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM V, 2013). The demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics and preoperative circulating miRNAs by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) were compared between patients with or without POD. Risk factors for POD were assessed via univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 370 participants were enrolled, of which 63 had suffered from POD within postoperative 7 days with an incidence of 17.0%. Preoperative miR-210 was a predictor for POD with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.921, a cut-off value of 1.67, a sensitivity of 95.11%, and a specificity of 92.06%, (P<0.001). In the multivariate logistic regression model, the relative expression of serum miR-210 was an independent risk factor for POD (OR: 3.37, 95%CI: 1.98-5.87, P=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the present study highlighted that preoperative miR-210 could serve as a potential predictor for POD in elderly GC patients undergoing curative resection.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes after Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Elderly Gastric Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: With the rapid aging of global population, the number of elderly patients with gastric cancer is increasing. This study aimed to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) versus open gastrectomy (OG) in elderly gastric cancer patients. Materials and Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library databases from January 1994 to May 2019. Surgical safety, postoperative complications, number of harvested lymph nodes, and overall survival rate were included and analyzed. The qualities of the included studies were evaluated by Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The evidence of outcomes was evaluated using the GRADE approach. The Review Manager^® 5.3 (Cochrane, London, UK) and Stata^® 14.0 (StataCorp., College Station, Texas) were used to analyze the outcomes. Results: Thirteen studies containing 4768 elderly patients with gastric cancer were included in this meta-analysis. LG was more favorable than OG in terms of overall postoperative morbidity (odds ratio [OR]: 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44 to 0.70; P < .00001), the postoperative stay (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.56; 95% CI: -0.76 to (-0.37); P < .00001), and the number of harvested lymph nodes (SMD: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.29; P = .0003). No significant difference was found in anastomotic leakage rate (OR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.59 to 1.12; P = .21), mental disease (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.44; P = .44), or overall survival rate (P = .62) between two groups. However, in the subgroup with a cutoff age of 80 years, the anastomotic leakage rate was higher in LG (OR: 10.27; 95% CI: 1.31 to 80.35; P = .03). Conclusions: LG was more favorable than OG in the elderly patients <80 years old with gastric cancer.

Laparoscopic vs. open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study in elderly people

The purpose of the study is to evaluate whether laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) is safe and feasible for elderly patients. From December 2015 to January 2019, 142 LPD surgeries and 93 OPD surgeries were performed by the same surgeon in the third affiliated hospital of Soochow University. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we retrospectively collected the date of three defined groups: LPD aged < 70 years (group I, 84 patients), LPD aged ≥ 70 years (group II, 56 patients) and OPD aged ≥ 70 years (group III, 28 patients). Baseline characteristics and short-term surgical outcomes of group I and group II, group II and group III were compared. Totally, 168 patients were included in this study; 100 cases were men; 68 cases were women; mean age was 67.9 ± 9.5 years. LPD does not perform as well in elderly as it does in non-elderly patients in terms of intraoperative blood loss (300.0 (200.0-500.0) ml vs. 200.0 (100.0-300.0) ml, p = 0.003), proportion of intraoperative transfusion (17.9% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.026) and time to oral intake (5.0 (4.0-7.0) day vs. 5.0 (3.0-6.0) day, p = 0.036). Operative time, conversion rate, postoperative stay, and proportion of reoperation, Clavien-Dindo classification, 30-day readmission and 90-day mortality were similar in two groups. In elderly patients, when compared with OPD, LPD had the advantage of shorter time to start oral intake (5.0 (4.0-7.0) day vs. 7.0 (5.0-11.3) day, p = 0.005) but the disadvantage of longer operative time (380.0 (306.3-447.5) min vs. 292.5 (255.0-342.5) min, p < 0.001) and higher hospitalization cost (12447.3 (10,189.7-15,340.0) euros vs. 7251.9 (8994.0-11,717.4) euros, p < 0.001). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative stay, and proportion of reoperation, Clavien-Dindo classification, 30-day readmission and 90-day mortality. LPD is safe and feasible for elderly people, but we need to consider its high cost and long operative time over OPD.

Incidence and risk factors of subsyndromal delirium after curative resection of gastric cancer

Background

Subsyndromal delirium, a condition in which patients exhibit some, but not all, of the symptoms of delirium, can negatively affect the outcomes of patients with cancer. However, the incidence of subsyndromal delirium in patients with gastric cancer is unknown. Here, we investigated the incidence and risk factors of subsyndromal delirium after curative resection of gastric cancer.

Methods

We recruited consecutive patients with gastric cancer who were scheduled for curative resection at a tertiary hospital. Patients’ subsyndromal delirium symptoms were serially assessed preoperatively and 1, 2, 3, and 7 days postoperatively using the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98). A DRS-R-98 score of 8–14 at any postoperative assessment was considered to indicate subsyndromal delirium. Sociodemographic and pre−/intra-operative clinical data were also assessed. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine the associated risk factors.

Results

Data were analysed from 163 out of 217 eligible patients. Postoperative delirium occurred in one patient (0.6%) and subsyndromal delirium occurred in 19 patients (11.7%). Age ≥ 70 years (odds ratio, [OR] 3.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36–10.92; p = 0.011) and education level ≤ 9 years (OR, 3.98; 95% CI, 1.39–11.41; p = 0.010) were independent risk factors of subsyndromal delirium after adjusting for preoperative cognitive function. Other pre−/intra-operative variables including anxiety/depression, poor sleep quality, and anaesthesia duration were not associated with subsyndromal delirium.

Conclusions

In contrast to the low incidence of delirium among patients undergoing curative resection of gastric cancer, a substantial proportion of such patients experienced subsyndromal delirium. Considering the prognostic implications, more careful detection and management of subsyndromal delirium may be warranted in patients with gastric cancer.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4681-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy for elderly gastric cancer patients: meta-analysis of non-randomized controlled studies

The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for elderly gastric cancer patients by comparing laparoscopic and conventional open gastrectomies (OG). Comprehensive search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases revealed nine non-randomized controlled studies that compared LG and OG in elderly gastric cancer patients We then analyzed dichotomous or continuous parameters using odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs). Overall survival was estimated using hazard ratios (HRs) with a fixed effects or random effects model. We observed that the age distribution was similar between the LG and OG patient groups (WMD -0.22 95% CI, -1.26-0.82). LG patients experienced less blood loss (WMD -119.14 95% CI, -204.17--34.11) and had shorter hospital stays (WMD -3.48 95% CI, -5.41--1.56), but endured longer operation times (WMD 10.87 95% CI, 2.50-19.24). Postoperatively, LG patients exhibited lower incidences of postoperative morbidities (OR 0.59 95% CI, 0.43-0.79), surgery related morbidities (OR 0.58 95% CI, 0.41-0.81) and systemic morbidities (OR 0.56 95% CI, 0.38-0.82). We observed no differences between the LG and OG patient groups regarding anastomotic leakage (OR 0.69 95% CI, 0.34-1.41), mental disease (OR 0.72 95% CI, 0.37-1.41) and long term effects (HR 0.98 95% CI, 0.74-1.32). We therefore conclude that laparoscopic gastrectomy might be technically feasible for elderly gastric cancer patients.