Nafamostat mesylate attenuates the pathophysiologic sequelae of neurovascular ischemia

Efficacy and safety of Nafamostat mesylate in patients with end-stage renal failure

BACKGROUND

Recent studies on dialysis anticoagulation therapy in patients with renal failure have shown that Nafamostat mesylate, a broad-spectrum potent serine protease inhibitor, has strong anticoagulation and anti-fiber activity.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Nafamostat mesylate in patients with end-stage renal failure.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients with end-stage renal failure who received hemodialysis at our hospital between January 2020 and August 2021 were selected and divided into the observation group (Nafamostat mesylate for injection, n = 33) and control group (heparin sodium injection, n = 32). General patient data, indicators of clinical efficacy, dialyzer hemocoagulation parameters, coagulation function indices, and hemoglobin concentration and platelet count before and after treatment, and the occurrence of adverse reactions after treatment were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The two groups showed no significant differences in general patient data (P > 0.05). The post-treatment effectiveness rate in the control group was lower than that in the observation group (P < 0.05). The two groups showed no significant difference in the number of patients in grade I (P > 0.05), while the number of patients in grade 0 was lower in the control group, and the number of patients in grades II and III was higher in the control group (P < 0.05). The post-treatment prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin time, and international normalized ratio values in the control group were higher than those in the observation group, while the fibrinogen level in the control group was lower than that in the observation group (P < 0.05). The two groups showed no significant difference in the platelet count and hemoglobin level before and after treatment (P > 0.05). The total number of post-treatment adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Treatment of patients showing end-stage renal failure with Nafamostat mesylate can significantly improve therapeutic efficacy and has high safety and clinical value.

Mechanistic Implications of GSK and CREB Crosstalk in Ischemia Injury

Ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury is a damage to an organ when the blood supply is less than the demand required for normal functioning, leading to exacerbation of cellular dysfunction and death. IR injury occurs in different organs like the kidney, liver, heart, brain, etc., and may not only involve the ischemic organ but also cause systemic damage to distant organs. Oxygen-glucose deprivation in cells causes oxidative stress, calcium overloading, inflammation, and apoptosis. CREB is an essential integrator of the body's various physiological systems, and it is widely accepted that dysfunction of CREB signaling is involved in many diseases, including ischemia-reperfusion injury. The activation of CREB can provide life to a cell and increase the cell's survival after ischemia. Hence, GSK/CREB signaling pathway can provide significant protection to cells of different organs after ischemia and emerges as a futuristic strategy for managing ischemia-reperfusion injury. Different signaling pathways such as MAPK/ERK, TLR4/MyD88, RISK, Nrf2, and NF-κB, get altered during IR injury by the modulation of GSK-3 and CREB (cyclic AMP response element (CRE)-binding protein). GSK-3 (protein kinase B) and CREB are the downstream targets for fulfilling the roles of various signaling pathways. Calcium overloading during ischemia increases the expression of calcium-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CaMK), which subsequently activates CREB-mediated transcription, thus promoting the survival of cells. Furthermore, this review highlights the crosstalk between GSK-3 and CREB, promoting survival and rendering the cells resistant to subsequent severe ischemia.

Clinical Value of the Prognostic Nutrition Index in the Assessment of Prognosis in Critically Ill Patients with Stroke: A Retrospective Analysis

Purpose

The purpose of study was to evaluate the association between prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and all-cause mortality of critically ill patients with stroke.

Methods

Clinical data derived from Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care were analyzed. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality; secondary endpoints were 90-day mortality and one-year cause mortality. The potential prognostic roles of PNI were analyzed by Cox proportional hazard models. The independent prognostic roles of PNI in the cases were analyzed by smooth curve fitting.

Results

Concerning 30-day mortality, the HR (95% CI) for a high PNI (≥39.7) was 0.700 (0.544, 0.900; P = 0.00539), compared to a low PNI (<39.7). After adjusting for multiple confounders, the HR (95% CI) for a high PNI (≥39.7) was 0.732 (0.547, 0.978; P = 0.03514), compared to a low PNI (<39.7). Regarding 90-day and one-year mortality, a similar trend was observed. In addition, a nonlinear association between PNI and 30-day mortality was found. Using recursive algorithm and two-piecewise linear regression model, inflection point (IP) was calculated, which was 49.4. On the right side of the IP, there was a positive relationship between PNI and 30-day mortality, and the effect size, 95% CI, and P value were 1.04 (1.01, 1.07), P = 0.0429, respectively. On the left of the IP, the effect size, 95% CI, and P value were 0.97 (0.96, 0.99) and 0.0011, respectively.

Conclusions

The PNI was an independent predicting factor of 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality of the critically ill patients with stroke. In addition, there was a U-shaped relationship between PNI and all-cause mortality of stroke patients. PNI was a risk factor for the outcome of stroke when PNI was >49.4, while PNI was a protective factor for outcome of stroke when PNI was <49.4.

Use of nafamostat mesilate for anticoagulation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) represents an advanced option for supporting refractory respiratory and/or cardiac failure. Systemic anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH) is routinely used. However, patients with bleeding risk and/or heparin-related side effects may necessitate alternative strategies: among these, nafamostat mesilate (NM) has been reported.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search (PubMed and EMBASE, updated 12/08/2021), including all studies reporting NM anticoagulation for ECMO. We focused on reasons for starting NM, its dose and the anticoagulation monitoring approach, the incidence of bleeding/thrombosis complications, the NM-related side effects, ECMO weaning, and mortality.

RESULTS

The search revealed 11 relevant findings, all with retrospective design. Of these, three large studies reported a control group receiving UFH, the other were case series (n = 3) or case reports (n = 5). The main reason reported for NM use was an ongoing or high risk of bleeding. The NM dose varied largely as did the anticoagulation monitoring approach. The average NM dose ranged from 0.46 to 0.67 mg/kg/h, but two groups of authors reported larger doses when monitoring anticoagulation with ACT. Conflicting findings were found on bleeding and thrombosis. The only NM-related side effect was hyperkalemia (n = 2 studies) with an incidence of 15%-18% in patients anticoagulated with NM. Weaning and survival varied across studies.

CONCLUSION

Anticoagulation with NM in ECMO has not been prospectively studied. While several centers have experience with this approach in high-risk patients, prospective studies are warranted to establish the optimal space of this approach in ECMO.

A comprehensive review of COVID-19 biology, diagnostics, therapeutics, and disease impacting the central nervous system

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is a highly transmissible disease. SARS-CoV-2 is estimated to have infected over 153 million people and to have caused over 3.2 million global deaths since its emergence in December 2019. SARS-CoV-2 is the seventh coronavirus known to infect humans, and like other coronaviruses, SARS-CoV-2 infection is characterized by a variety of symptoms including general flu-like symptoms such as a fever, sore throat, fatigue, and shortness of breath. Severe cases often display signs of pneumonia, lymphopenia, acute kidney injury, cardiac injury, cytokine storms, lung damage, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multiple organ failure, sepsis, and death. There is evidence that around 30% of COVID-19 cases have central nervous system (CNS) or peripheral nervous system (PNS) symptoms along with or in the absence of the previously mentioned symptoms. In cases of CNS/PNS impairments, patients display dizziness, ataxia, seizure, nerve pain, and loss of taste and/or smell. This review highlights the neurological implications of SARS-CoV-2 and provides a comprehensive summary of the research done on SARS-CoV-2 pathology, diagnosis, therapeutics, and vaccines up to May 5.

Dopaminergic Receptors as Neuroimmune Mediators in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis

The dopaminergic system plays an essential role in maintaining homeostasis between the central nervous system (CNS) and the immune system. Previous studies have associated imbalances in the dopaminergic system to the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS). Here, we examined the protein levels of dopaminergic receptors (D1R and D2R) in different phases of the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model. We also investigated if the treatment with pramipexole (PPX)-a dopamine D2/D3 receptor-preferring agonist-would be able to prevent EAE-induced motor and mood dysfunction, as well as its underlying mechanisms of action. We report that D2R immunocontent is upregulated in the spinal cord of EAE mice 14 days post-induction. Moreover, D1R and D2R immunocontents in lymph nodes and the oxidative damage in the spinal cord and striatum of EAE animals were significantly increased during the chronic phase. Also, during the pre-symptomatic phase, axonal damage in the spinal cord of EAE mice could already be found. Surprisingly, therapeutic treatment with PPX failed to inhibit the progression of EAE. Of note, PPX treatment inhibited EAE-induced depressive-like while failed to inhibit anhedonic-like behaviors. We observed that PPX treatment downregulated IL-1β levels and increased BNDF content in the spinal cord after EAE induction. Herein, we show that a D2/D3 receptor-preferred agonist mitigated EAE-induced depressive-like behavior, which could serve as a new possibility for further clinical trials on treating depressive symptoms in MS patients. Thus, we infer that D2R participates in the crosstalk between CNS and immune system during autoimmune and neuroinflammatory response induced by EAE, mainly in the acute and chronic phase of the disease.

Bidirectional communication between mast cells and the gut-brain axis in neurodegenerative diseases: Avenues for therapeutic intervention

Although the global incidence of neurodegenerative diseases has been steadily increasing, especially in adults, there are no effective therapeutic interventions. Neurodegeneration is a heterogeneous group of disorders that is characterized by the activation of immune cells in the central nervous system (CNS) (e.g., mast cells and microglia) and subsequent neuroinflammation. Mast cells are found in the brain and the gastrointestinal tract and play a role in "tuning" neuroimmune responses. The complex bidirectional communication between mast cells and gut microbiota coordinates various dynamic neuro-cellular responses, which propagates neuronal impulses from the gastrointestinal tract into the CNS. Numerous inflammatory mediators from degranulated mast cells alter intestinal gut permeability and disrupt blood-brain barrier, which results in the promotion of neuroinflammatory processes leading to neurological disorders, thereby offsetting the balance in immune-surveillance. Emerging evidence supports the hypothesis that gut-microbiota exert a pivotal role in inflammatory signaling through the activation of immune and inflammatory cells. Communication between inflammatory cytokines and neurocircuits via the gut-brain axis (GBA) affects behavioral responses, activates mast cells and microglia that causes neuroinflammation, which is associated with neurological diseases. In this comprehensive review, we focus on what is currently known about mast cells and the gut-brain axis relationship, and how this relationship is connected to neurodegenerative diseases. We hope that further elucidating the bidirectional communication between mast cells and the GBA will not only stimulate future research on neurodegenerative diseases but will also identify new opportunities for therapeutic interventions.