Quality Indicators of Intravenous Thrombolysis from North India

Stroke systems of care in South-East Asia Region (SEAR): commonalities and diversities

The Southeast Asia Region (SEAR) accounts for nearly 50% of the developing world's stroke burden. With various commonalities across its countries concerning health services, user awareness, and healthcare-seeking behavior, SEAR still presents profound diversities in stroke-related services across the continuum of care. This review highlights the numerous systems and challenges in access to stroke care, acute stroke care services, and health care systems, including rehabilitation. The paper has also attempted to compile information on the availability of stroke specialized centers, Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) ready centers, Endovascular therapy (EVT) ready centers, rehabilitation centers, and workforce against a backdrop of each country's population. Lastly, the efforts of WHO (SEARO)-CMCL (World Health Organization-South East Asia region, Christian Medical College & Hospital Ludhiana) collaboration towards improving stroke services and capacity among the SEAR have been described.

Safety and efficacy of low-cost alternative urokinase in acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Use of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) varies greatly between countries, ranging from 10% to 15% in high-income countries to less than 2% in low- and middle income countries (LMICs). This is because alteplase is expensive and has been cited as one of the most common barriers to IVT in LMICs. Urokinase (UK) is a thrombolytic agent which is almost 50 times cheaper with easier production and purification than alteplase. UK may become a cost-effective option for IVT in LMICs if it is found to be safe and effective. We conducted this study to assess the existing evidence on the safety and efficacy of UK vs alteplase for IVT in AIS.

METHODS

The study was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta-Analyses) guideline. Systematic literature search was done in PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar for English literature published from 2010 to 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 4061 participants in the alteplase and 2062 participants in the UK group were included in the final statistical analysis. After IVT, a good functional outcome at last follow-up was found among 80.57 % of patients in the alteplase group compared to 73.79 % of patients in the UK group (OR: 1.11; 95 % CI: 0.95- 1.31; I2 = 0 %; P = 0.18). Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage (sICH) was found among 1.77 % of patients in the alteplase group compared to 2.83 % of patients in the UK group (OR: 0.84; 95 % CI: 0.56- 1.26; I2 = 0 %; P = 0.41). Similarly, mortality was found among 5.03 % of patients in the alteplase group compared to 5.42 % of patients in the UK group (OR: 0.87; 95 % CI: 0.66-1.14; I2 = 0 %; P = 0.30).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis found that intravenous UK is not inferior to alteplase in terms of safety and efficacy and can be a viable alternative for IVT in AIS patients in LMICs.

Low-dose alteplase for the management of acute ischemic stroke in South Asians: A systematic review on cost, efficacy and safety

INTRODUCTION

South Asia is responsible for more than 40% of the stroke burden and stroke mortality in the developing world. South Asia, which is home to one-fourth of the world's population, is the most densely populated and one of the poorest regions. The majority of patients in this region are unable to afford intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). If low-dose alteplase proves effective and safe in South Asians, it may be a more cost-effective treatment option.

METHODS

The study was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta-Analyses) guideline. Researchers searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar for English literature from 2005 to 2021. END, ENI, good functional outcome, SICH, and all-cause mortality were used to assess efficacy and safety.

RESULTS

In the low-dose alteplase treated patients, different studies reported 32 to 57% ENI 24 h after IVT, and 7% to 9.7% END. At 3 months follow-up, good functional outcome was achieved by 48%-76.92% of low-dose alteplase treated patients. SICH rates ranged from 0% to 16.6% across studies. Asymptomatic ICH occurred in 5-14% of patients. The mortality rate in all included studies varied from none to 25%.

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review demonstrates that the use of low-dose alteplase for AIS in the South Asians offer comparable efficacy and reduced risk of SICH at a significantly lower cost than standard alteplase dose. Future well-randomized clinical trials are necessary to validate the findings of our study.

Regional differences in ischemic stroke in India (north vs. south)

BACKGROUND

India is a large country with geographically diverse populations and varying risk factors. Identification of regional differences can improve healthcare policy decisions.

AIM

To study regional differences in stroke between North and South India.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the Indo-US Collaborative Stroke Project, a National Institute of Health-funded multicentre prospective study conducted in five academic centers in India with a US-based coordinating center. Risk factors, severity, mechanisms, management, complications, and outcomes among ischemic stroke patients were compared between North and South Indian centers.

RESULTS

Of the 2066 patients enrolled from North (n = 1060) and South India (n = 1006), North Indian patients were significantly older with fewer men and had lower rates of diabetes (32.8% vs. 38.7%, p < 0.01), dyslipidemia (3.5% vs. 25.7%, p < 0.01), tobacco use (27% vs. 38%, p < 0.001), and alcohol use (30.1% vs. 38.6%, p < 0.01). North Indian patients had higher median National Institute of Health stroke scale scores (10 vs. 9, p < 0.01), more frequent large-artery atherosclerosis mechanism (34% vs. 25.6%, p < 0.001), intravenous thrombolysis (14.0% vs. 6.1%, p < 0.001), and lower rates of pneumonia (10.5% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.02). The three-month outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2, 45.8% vs. 50.3%, p = 0.08) did not differ; however, North Indian patients had higher 90-day mortality (23.5% vs. 13.5%, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The substantial regional differences in stroke risk factors and mechanisms may be partly explained by factors such as differing dietary habits and lifestyle, which can be addressed at a national level. Differences in acute and inpatient stroke care suggest a need for better adoption of national stroke management guidelines.