A Study of 24 Patients with Colistin-Resistant Gram-negative Isolates in a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India

Combination therapy with IV fosfomycin for adult patients with serious Gram-negative infections: a review of the literature

Treatment of patients with serious infections due to resistant Gram-negative bacteria remains highly problematic and has prompted clinicians to use existing antimicrobial agents in innovative ways. One approach gaining increased therapeutic use is combination therapy with IV fosfomycin. This article reviews the preclinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) infection model and clinical data surrounding the use of combination therapy with IV fosfomycin for the treatment of serious infections caused by resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Data from dynamic in vitro and animal infection model studies of highly resistant Enterobacterales and non-lactose fermenters are positive and suggest IV fosfomycin in combination with a β-lactam, polymyxin or aminoglycoside produces a synergistic effect that rivals or surpasses that of other aminoglycoside- or polymyxin-containing regimens. Clinical studies performed to date primarily have involved patients with pneumonia and/or bacteraemia due to Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Acinetobacter baumannii. Overall, the observed success rates with fosfomycin combination regimens were consistent with those reported for other combination regimens commonly used to treat these patients. In studies in which direct treatment comparisons can be derived, the results suggest that patients who received fosfomycin combination therapy had similar or improved outcomes compared with other therapies and combinations, especially when it was used in combination with a β-lactam that (1) targets PBP-3 and (2) has exceptional stability in the presence of β-lactamases. Collectively, the data indicate that combination therapy with IV fosfomycin should be considered as a potential alternative to aminoglycoside or polymyxin combinations for patients with antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative infections when benefits outweigh risks.

Study of Colistin Resistant Gram Negative Organism in Hospitalized Patients: A Retrospective Study

Background

Intensive care units have become hotspots for antimicrobial resistance, particularly concerning colistin resistance, posing a threat of untreatable infections.

Aim

This study aims to analyze the epidemiological and clinical aspects of patients carrying colistin-resistant organisms. It focuses on identifying risk factors, the microbiological profile, susceptibility patterns, and treatment outcomes.

Materials and methods

Isolates with colistin MIC >2 µg/mL, identified via BD PHOENIX, were subjected to colistin broth disc elution testing (as per CLSI guidelines) in our Microbiology Department between January and December 2022.

Results

Among the 30 patients, colistin-resistant gram-negative isolates were found predominantly in blood cultures (50%), followed by ET/TT cultures (23.3%), urine cultures (10%), and other sites (16.7%). Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common organism (80%), showing the highest sensitivity to Ceftazidime-avibactam + Aztreonam (CAZ-AVI + ATM) (76.7%). Of these patients, 66.7% recovered and were discharged, while 33.3% succumbed during hospitalization despite treatment.

Conclusion

The study underscores a notable presence of colistin-resistant gram-negative isolates, predominantly in blood cultures, with K. pneumoniae being predominant. The combination of CAZ-AVI + ATM exhibited the highest sensitivity. However, the mortality rate of 33.3% despite sensitive antibiotic treatment highlights the urgency for ongoing vigilance and research to combat colistin-resistant infections and improve patient outcomes.

How to cite this article

Diwane D, Rajhans PA, Jog SA, Dalvi M. Study of Colistin Resistant Gram Negative Organism in Hospitalized Patients: A Retrospective Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(3):286-289.

Comparative evaluation of Vitek®2 and broth microdilution method for colistin susceptibility testing of Gram-negative isolates from intensive care unit in a tertiary care hospital

INTRODUCTION

Colistin is the last resort treatment against resistant Gram-negative bacteria, necessitating reliable and rapid means for sensitivity testing of colistin. Automated systems like VITEK®2 are adopted to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) due to easy usage. Broth microdilution (BMD) for colistin MIC was suggested by EUCAST and CLSI.

OBJECTIVE

To compare and evaluate colistin MIC by BMD and VITEK®2 against Gram-negative organisms from the ICU in a tertiary care hospital.

METHOD

Clinically significant organisms isolated from ICU patients were included. MIC was determined using BMD and VITEK®2. Very major error (VME), major error (ME), essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, and specificity were analysed.

RESULT

533 isolates were obtained from blood (435,81.60%), respiratory samples (57,10.70%), pus and exudates (20,3.80%), urine (18,3.40%), and CSF (3,0.60%). The Enterobacterales were K. pneumoniae (185,34.70%) E. coli (73,13.70%) and E. cloacae (26,4.90%) while non-fermenters were A. baumannii (209,39.20%) and P. aeruginosa (40,7.50%). The VITEK®2 sensitivity was >99%; specificity ranged from 14.28 to 52.94%. PPV was 93.81% while NPV was 93.75%. VME ranged from 47 to 100% between isolates. ME was up to 20%. The highest VME was obtained in E. coli (100%). The total EA and CA observed were 68.5% and 99.79% respectively.

CONCLUSION

Automated system VITEK®2 failed to detect the resistance in 32 (60%) isolates. The obtained VME and ME values were >3%, which is unacceptable as per the standard guidelines. EA of ≥90% wasn't obtained. Sensitivity for VITEK®2 was >99%, but had low specificity (14.28%). Hence, VITEK®2 is not reliable for colistin susceptibility testing.

Risk Factors and Outcomes for Isolation with Polymyxin B-Resistant Enterobacterales from 2018-2022: A Case-Control Study

Purpose

To analyze the risk factors and clinical outcomes of patients isolated with polymyxin B-resistant (PR) Enterobacterales from various clinical specimens to prevent and control the spread of these strains.

Methods

This retrospective case-control study included 72 PR Enterobacterales-positive cases and 144 polymyxin B-susceptible (PS) Enterobacterales controls from 2018 to 2022. Patients with PR Enterobacterales isolated in various clinical cultures were defined as cases. Patients with PS Enterobacterales cultures at similar anatomic sites during the same period were randomly selected as controls. Data were collected from clinical and laboratory test records. Bivariable logistic regression and Pearson's chi-square tests were used to assess risk factors.

Results

PR strains were predominantly Klebsiella pneumoniae (72.2%) and Salmonella enteritidis (8.3%). Of the patients, 66.04% were admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). Risk factors for isolation with PR strains included chronic heart disease (P = 0.012; odds ratio [OR] 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.28), immunosuppressant use (P = 0.016; OR 1.04 [1.0-1.07), drainage tube [head] (P = 0.006; OR 1.1 [1.0-1.1]), and polymyxin B exposure (P = 0.007; OR 1.03 [1.0-1.06]. With respect to outcomes, admission to an ICU (P = 0.003; OR 7.1 [1.9-25.4]), hypertension (P = 0.035; OR 1.4 [1.02-1.83]), and drainage tube [head] (P = 0.044; OR 1.1 [1.0-1.15]) were associated with treatment failure. Additionally, treatment failure was more frequent in patients (45.83%) than in controls (14.58%).

Conclusion

The major risk factors for isolation with PR strains were chronic heart disease, exposure to immunosuppressants, use of drainage tubes, and polymyxin B exposure. The isolation of PR strains in patients was a predictor of unfavorable outcomes. These findings provide a basis for monitoring the spread of PR Enterobacterales.

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial colonization in patients, carriage by healthcare workers and contamination of hospital environments in Ghana

BACKGROUND

Patients already colonized with multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) on admission to critical care units may be an important source of transmission of these bacteria in hospitals. We sought to determine the prevalence of MDR GNB colonization in patients, staff and the ward environment and to assess the risk factors for colonization of patients in wards.

METHODS

The study was conducted from April 2021 to July 2021 in a teaching hospital in Ghana. MDR GNB were isolated from rectal, and hand swabs were taken from patients on admission and after 48 h. Swabs from HCW's hands and the ward environment were also taken. Risk factors for colonization with MDR GNB were assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

MDR GNB rectal colonization rate among patients was 50.62% on admission and 44.44% after 48 h. MDR GNB were isolated from 6 (5.26%) and 24 (11.54%) of HCW's hand swabs and environmental swabs, respectively. Previous hospitalization (p-value = 0.021, OR, 95% CI= 7.170 (1.345-38.214) was significantly associated with colonization by MDR GNB after 48 h of admission. Age (21-30 years) (p-value = 0.022, OR, 95% CI = 0.103 (0.015-0.716) was significantly identified as a protective factor associated with a reduced risk of rectal MDR GNB colonization.

CONCLUSION

The high colonization of MDR GNB in patients, the carriage of MDR GNB on HCW's hands, and the contamination of hospital environments highlights the need for patient screening and stringent infection prevention and control practices to prevent the spread of MDR GNB in hospitals.

Comparative Evaluation of Broth Microdilution With Disc Diffusion and VITEK 2 for Susceptibility Testing of Colistin on Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria

Background The rise of antibiotic resistance, particularly in Gram-negative bacteria, poses a significant global health threat. Colistin, a last-resort antibiotic, has witnessed renewed use. However, accurate susceptibility testing for colistin is challenging, with various methods available, leading to potential discrepancies. Ensuring reliable testing is crucial for effective patient treatment and antimicrobial stewardship. This study addresses the need to compare different colistin susceptibility testing methods, providing insights into their accuracy and relevance in clinical settings. Methods In this one-year prospective observational cross-sectional study conducted at Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (IGIMS), Bihar, India, a tertiary care hospital from July 2021 to June 2022, we aimed to evaluate the concordance between two widely used methods, VITEK 2 and Disc Diffusion, for antibiotic susceptibility testing in clinical multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial isolates. These isolates, including species like Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella oxytoca, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Citrobacter freundii, and Escherichia coli, were isolated from various clinical specimens. After rigorous species-level identification and quality control measures, antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using both methods, and their agreement was assessed through Percentage Agreement analysis. Results In our study, we isolated and identified bacterial isolates from 105 patients, with a mean age of 47.30 years, demonstrating a wide age range. Pus samples were the most common type (25.7%), and K. pneumoniae was the most prevalent organism (45.7%). Antibiotic resistance patterns revealed significant challenges in treating infections caused by K. pneumoniae and A. baumannii, with resistance rates exceeding 70% for certain antibiotics. Among the 48 isolates of K. pneumoniae, the agreement was 93.8%, with 89.6% being sensitive and 6.3% being resistant by Disc Diffusion, while VITEK 2 indicated 0% resistance. E. coli isolates (n=21) had an agreement of 90.5%, with 90.5% sensitivity and 9.5% resistance by Disc Diffusion, and no resistance by VITEK 2. Conclusion The comparative analysis of antibiotic susceptibility testing methods reveals the superior performance of the VITEK 2 system, particularly in sensitivity and negative predictive value, emphasizing its potential as a reliable tool for guiding antibiotic therapy decisions.

Risk factors associated with colistin resistance in carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales: a multicenter study from a low-income country

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the risk factors for colistin-resistant carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CR-CPE), and describe the mortality associated with this organism, in a low-income country.

METHODS

A descriptive, observational, and prospective multicenter study was carried out in Guayaquil, Ecuador. All patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales admitted between December 2021 and May 2022 were enrolled. Infection definitions were established according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) protocols. The presence of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales was confirmed with a multiplex PCR for blaKPC, blaNDM, blaOXA-48, blaVIM, and blaIMP genes. MCR-1 production was studied molecularly, and MLST assays were carried out.

RESULTS

Out of 114 patients enrolled in the study, 32 (28.07%) had at least one positive sample for CR-CPE. Klebsiella pneumoniae ST512-KPC-3 was the most frequent microorganism isolated. Parenteral feeding, β-lactamase inhibitor use, recent hemodialysis, and renal failure were all considered independent risk factors for carrying CR-CPE. A mortality of 41.22% was detected, but we could not find any difference between colistin-resistant and colistin-susceptible CPE. MCR-1 production was not detected in any of the isolates studied.

CONCLUSION

A significant burden for CR-CPE was found in a South American country that was mainly caused by the high-risk clone K. pneumoniae ST512-KPC-3 and not mediated by mcr-1 production. Its acquisition involved parenteral feeding, β-lactamase inhibitor use, recent hemodialysis, and renal failure as independent risk factors, demonstrating the critical need for infection prevention and stewardship programs to avoid dissemination to other countries in the region.

Evaluation of in-vitro colistin susceptibility and clinical profile of carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae related invasive infections

PURPOSE

To determine the colistin susceptibility. To compare E-test vs broth-microdilution (BMD) method for invasive carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. To study treatment options for the CRE. To analyze the clinical profile and outcome of CRE infections.

METHODS

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed for 100 invasive CRE isolates. Gradient diffusion and BMD methods were performed to determine colistin MICs. Essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), very major error (VME), and major error (ME) were worked out between BMD method and E-test. The clinical profile of patients was analyzed.

RESULTS

The majority of the patients suffered from bacteremia [47(47%)]. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common organism isolated overall as well as among bacteremic isolates. 9(9%) CRE isolates were colistin resistant by BMD of which six were Klebsiella pneumoniae. There was 97% CA between E-test and BMD. EA was 68%. VME was found in three out of nine colistin resistant isolates. No ME was found. Among the other antibiotics tested for CRE isolates, the highest susceptibility was seen to tigecycline [43(43%)] followed by amikacin [19 (19%)]. The most common underlying condition was post solid organ transplantation [36(36%)]. A higher survival rate was seen among non-bacteremic CRE infections (58.49%) than bacteremic CRE infections (42.6%). Four out of nine patients with colistin resistant CRE infections survived and had a satisfactory outcome.

CONCLUSION

Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common organism causing invasive infection. Survival rates were higher in non-bacteremic CRE infections than bacteremic infections. Good CA was seen between E-test and BMD for colistin susceptibility, but the EA was poor. VME was more common than ME when E-tests were used for colistin susceptibility testing resulting in false susceptibility. Tigecycline and aminoglycosides are possible adjunct drugs for the treatment of invasive CRE infections.

Emergence of colistin-resistant gram-negative rods in intensive care units: A cross-sectional study from a developing country

Objectives

To determine the clinical features, outcomes, and factors associated with the emergence of colistin-resistant gram-negative rods isolated from patients admitted to intensive care units.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted at the intensive care units of Liaquat National Hospital, from April 2019 to February 2020. Gram-negative rods resistant to colistin with minimum inhibitory concentrations ⩾ 4 mcg/mL according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute criteria as reported in cultures were included. Clinical, demographical data and treatment given were recorded and analyzed using SPSS version 25.

Results

A total of 93 patients were included; 58.1% were males. The mean age of patients was 59.48 ± 18.36 years. The most common organism isolated was Klebsiella pneumoniae (91.4%). The most common specimen was the tracheal (62.4%). Ventilator-acquired pneumonia was seen in 38.7%. The most common co-morbid disease seen in patients was diabetes (41%); 77% had a symptomatic infection and were treated with a combination of 2 or more antibiotics, most commonly meropenem plus fosfomycin. The most common susceptible antibiotics were fosfomycin (72%) and tigecycline (50.5%). Mean intensive care unit stay and total duration of hospital stay were prolonged (16.83 ± 12.93 and 23.34 ± 17.52 days, respectively). Forty-eight (62.3%) patients with symptomatic infection with colistin-resistant isolates were treated and discharged, and mortality was seen in 23 (29.9%). A significant association was found between mortality and symptomatic infection, endotracheal intubation with mechanical ventilation (p = 0.003), and a prolonged hospital stay of >20 days (p = 0.041).

Conclusion

Colistin-resistant gram-negative rods pose a significant problem especially in developing countries because of limited therapeutic options. Stringent infection control and comprehensive antimicrobial stewardship programs are needed to overcome this challenge.

Sepsis Management in Southeast Asia: A Review and Clinical Experience

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that causes a global health burden associated with high mortality and morbidity. Often life-threatening, sepsis can be caused by bacteria, viruses, parasites or fungi. Sepsis management primarily focuses on source control and early broad-spectrum antibiotics, plus organ function support. Comprehensive changes in the way we manage sepsis patients include early identification, infective focus identification and immediate treatment with antimicrobial therapy, appropriate supportive care and hemodynamic optimization. Despite all efforts of clinical and experimental research over thirty years, the capacity to positively influence the outcome of the disease remains limited. This can be due to limited studies available on sepsis in developing countries, especially in Southeast Asia. This review summarizes the progress made in the diagnosis and time associated with sepsis, colistin resistance and chloramphenicol boon, antibiotic abuse, resource constraints and association of sepsis with COVID-19 in Southeast Asia. A personalized approach and innovative therapeutic alternatives such as CytoSorb® are highlighted as potential options for the treatment of patients with sepsis in Southeast Asia.

Detection of Colistin Resistance in Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae by Reference Broth Microdilution and Comparative Evaluation of Three Other Methods

Objective Challenges in susceptibility testing of colistin along with increase in the prevalence of colistin-resistant carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) pathogens needs addressal. Evaluation of user-friendly methods is necessary as an alternative to broth microdilution (BMD), the reference susceptibility testing method, for routine implementation in diagnostic clinical microbiology laboratories. Genotypic detection of the plasmid-mediated colistin resistance is also needed for infection control purposes.

Materials and Methods Colistin susceptibility of 200 nonduplicate clinical CRE isolates from December 2017 to June 2019 was determined by BMD, agar dilution (AD), E test, and rapid polymyxin NP test and interpreted as per the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. The results of AD, E test, and NP test were compared with that of BMD, considering minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤ 2 µg/mL as susceptible and > 2 µg/mL as resistant. Presence of any plasmid-mediated colistin resistance (mcr-1 and 2) was evaluated in 27 colistin-resistant CRE isolates by polymerase chain reaction.

Statistical Analysis Performance of different phenotypic methods was analyzed by comparing MIC results of AD and E test with that of reference BMD method. Agreement between BMD and the other two methods was expressed in terms of categorical agreement and essential agreement. Errors were expressed as very major error (VME: false-susceptible) and major error (ME: false-resistance) by AD/E test. VME and ME of 3% disagreement were considered unacceptable.

Results Colistin resistance was found in 27 (13.5%) isolates by BMD method. The VME rates of both AD (11%) and E test (37%) could not meet the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommendation (< 3% VME rate is acceptable) as alternative tests to the reference BMD. Colistin NP test showed sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 98%, respectively. The percentage discordant result in NP test was highest in Enterobacter spp. (17%). None of the 27 colistin resistant isolates showed presence of mcr-1 and mcr-2 genes.

Conclusion High VME rate in AD and E tests precludes their use as alternatives to BMD for colistin susceptibility testing. NP test with moderate sensitivity but excellent specificity can be a good alternative for testing colistin susceptibility in CRE isolates, except in Enterobacter spp. Absence of mcr-1 and mcr-2 gene necessitates the exploration of other mechanisms of colistin resistance.

Prevalence of Colistin-resistant Gram-negative Isolates Carrying the mcr-1 Gene among Patients Visiting a Tertiary Care Center

Introduction:

Gram-negative isolates harboring mobilized colistin resistance (mcr-1) gene are a great threat to human health. They have been reported worldwide among various bacterial isolates. This work aimed to study the prevalence of colistin resistance among Gram-negative bacteria and the incidence of mcr-1 gene among these isolates.

Methods:

A descriptive cross-sectional study was done at a tertiary care center from June 2016 to February 2017. An ethical approval was taken from review board of the Nepal Health Research Council (Reg. no: 274/2016). Convenience sampling was used. The data was collected and analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2010 and Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 16 . Point estimate at 95% Confidence Interval was calculated along with frequency and proportion for binary data.

Results:

Among 485 gram-negative isolates, only 13 (2.68%) (1.26-6.62 at 95% Confidence Interval) isolates were colistin-resistant and mcr-1 was present in two isolates. Predominant colistin-resistant isolates were E. coli 6 (4.1%), Enterobacter spp 2 (2.81%), and Acinetobacter spp 2 (2.81%). A high level of colistin-resistance was noted in 4 (30.7%) isolates as indicated by the very high value of colistin MIC (>256 μg/ml). ICU was the major site of isolation of colistin-resistant and mcr-1 positive pathogens. The majority of colistin-resistant isolates were highly drug-resistant and were sensitive only to polymyxin B. Antibiotics like imipenem, amikacin, gentamicin, aztreonam, ciprofloxacin, and piperacillin-tazobactam were effective for few of these isolates.

Conclusions:

Though the prevalence of mcr-1 gene was low among colistin-resistant gram-negative isolates, the resistant pattern was quite alarming as these isolates were highly drug-resistant.

ent-Beyerane Diterpenes as a Key Platform for the Development of ArnT-Mediated Colistin Resistance Inhibitors

Colistin is a last-resort antibiotic for the treatment of multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. Recently, a natural ent-beyerene diterpene was identified as a promising inhibitor of the enzyme responsible for colistin resistance mediated by lipid A aminoarabinosylation in Gram-negative bacteria, namely, ArnT (undecaprenyl phosphate-alpha-4-amino-4-deoxy-l-arabinose arabinosyl transferase). Here, semisynthetic analogues of hit were designed, synthetized, and tested against colistin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains including clinical isolates to exploit the versatility of the diterpene scaffold. Microbiological assays coupled with molecular modeling indicated that for a more efficient colistin adjuvant activity, likely resulting from inhibition of the ArnT activity by the selected compounds and therefore from their interaction with the catalytic site of ArnT, an ent-beyerane scaffold is required along with an oxalate-like group at C-18/C-19 or a sugar residue at C-19 to resemble L-Ara4N. The ent-beyerane skeleton is identified for the first time as a privileged scaffold for further cost-effective development of valuable colistin resistance inhibitors.

ChloS-HRM, a novel assay to identify chloramphenicol-susceptible Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Malawi

OBJECTIVES

Chloramphenicol is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial widely available in sub-Saharan Africa. With susceptibility re-emerging among Enterobacteriaceae in Blantyre, Malawi, we designed and evaluated a new high-resolution melt (HRM) RT-PCR assay, ChloS-HRM, to identify chloramphenicol-susceptible infections in a hospital setting.

METHODS

Seventy-two previously whole-genome sequenced isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae from the Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Malawi, were subjected to determination of chloramphenicol MICs. Primers were designed to detect 18 chloramphenicol resistance genes that produce seven distinct peaks correlating with different gene groups (catA1, catA2, catA3, catB2, catB group 3, cmlA and floR) following HRM analysis. ChloS-HRM results were compared with MIC and WGS results.

RESULTS

ChloS-HRM correctly identified 15 of 17 phenotypically susceptible isolates and 54 of 55 resistant isolates, giving an accuracy of 88% in identifying susceptibility and 98% in identifying resistance. WGS identified 16 of 17 susceptible and 54 of 55 resistant isolates, giving an accuracy of 94% in identifying susceptibility and 98% in identifying resistance. The single false-susceptible result had no detectable gene by ChloS-HRM or WGS. Compared with WGS, ChloS-HRM had 100% sensitivity and specificity for catA (catA1-3), cmlA and floR, and 96% specificity for catB; sensitivity could not be estimated due to the lack of catB in the clinical sample collection. The overall agreement between MIC and HRM was 96% and between MIC and WGS it was 97%.

CONCLUSIONS

ChloS-HRM could support antimicrobial stewardship in enabling de-escalation from third-generation cephalosporins by identifying chloramphenicol-susceptible infections. This would be valuable in areas with chloramphenicol-susceptible MDR and XDR Enterobacteriaceae.

Understanding policy dilemmas around antibiotic use in food animals & offering potential solutions

The looming concern of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has prompted the government of many countries of the world to act upon and come up with the guidelines, comprehensive recommendations and policies concerning prudent use of antibiotics and containment of AMR. However, such initiatives from countries with high incidence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in food animals are still in infancy. This review highlights the existing global policies on antibiotics use in food animals along with details of the various Indian policies and guidelines. In India, in spite of availability of integrated policies for livestock, poultry and aquaculture sector, uniform regulations with coordinated initiative are needed to formulate strict policies regarding antimicrobial use both in humans and animals. In an attempt to create effective framework to tackle the AMR, the Indian Council of Medical Research initiated a series of dialogues with various stakeholders and suggested various action points for urgent implementation. This review summarizes the recommendations made during the various consultations. The overarching aim of this review is to clearly delineate the action points which need to be carried out urgently to regulate the antibiotic use in animals.

Risk Factors for Colistin Resistance among Gram-Negative Rods and Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates

Infections due to colistin-resistant (Col^r) Gram-negative rods (GNRs) and colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in particular result in high associated mortality and poor treatment options. To determine the risk factors for recovery on culture of Col^r GNRs and Col^rK. pneumoniae, analyses were chosen to aid decisions at two separate time points: the first when only Gram stain results are available without any bacterial species information (corresponding to the Col^r GNR model) and the second when organism identification is performed but prior to reporting of antimicrobial susceptibility testing results (corresponding to the Col^rK. pneumoniae model). Cases were retrospectively analyzed at a major academic hospital system from 2011 to 2016. After excluding bacteria that were intrinsically resistant to colistin, a total of 28,512 GNR isolates (4,557 K. pneumoniae isolates) were analyzed, 128 of which were Col^r (i.e., MIC > 2 μg/ml), including 68 of which that were Col^rK. pneumoniae In multivariate analysis, risk factors for Col^r GNRs were neurologic disease, residence in a skilled nursing facility prior to admission, receipt of carbapenems in the last 90 days, prior infection with a carbapenem-resistant organism, and receipt of ventilatory support (c-statistic = 0.81). Risk factors for Col^rK. pneumoniae specifically were neurologic disease, residence in a skilled nursing facility prior to admission, receipt of carbapenems in the last 90 days, receipt of an anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus antimicrobial in the last 90 days, and prior infection with a carbapenem-resistant organism (c-statistic = 0.89). A scoring system derived from these models can be applied by providers to guide empirical antimicrobial therapy in patients with infections with suspected Col^r GNR and Col^rK. pneumoniae isolates.

Risk factors for colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in a low-endemicity setting for carbapenem resistance - a matched case-control study

BackgroundEmergence of colistin resistance has been related to increased use in clinical settings, following global spread of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Use of colistin in animal production may constitute a further source of spread of resistant strains to humans. We sought to determine risk factors for human colonisation or infection with colistin-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in a setting where colistin is mainly used for animal production. Methods: This retrospective matched case-control study was performed during a 5-year period at two university-affiliated hospitals in Basel, Switzerland. Conditional univariable logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) for colistin resistance. All variables found to be significant in univariable analyses were included in the conditional multivariable regression model using stepwise forward and backward selection. Results: Forty-two cases (33 with colistin-resistant E. coli, 9 with colistin-resistant K. pneumoniae) and 126 matched controls were identified. Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, prior exposure to antibiotics and healthcare settings did not differ between cases and controls, except for prior exposure to carbapenems, hospitalisation and stay abroad during the prior 3 months. In multivariable analyses, only prior exposure to carbapenems remained associated with colistin resistance (OR: 5.00; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.19-20.92; p = 0.028). Conclusion: In a low-endemicity setting for carbapenem resistance, prior exposure to carbapenems was the only risk factor for colonisation or infection with colistin-resistant E. coli or K. pneumoniae. Prior exposure to colistin was not significantly associated with detection of colistin resistance, which mainly occurred in the absence of concurrent carbapenem resistance.