Prognostic Value of a Tissue Doppler Index of Systodiastolic Function in Patients with Asymptomatic Heart Failure

Impact of first-line antihypertensive drug class and intensity on NT-proBNP improvement and cardiovascular outcomes among hypertensive patients with pre-heart failure: findings from SPRINT trial

Five first-line classes of antihypertensive drugs are recommended for hypertension treatment. However, it is unclear which class should be chosen for hypertensive patients with pre-heart failure (pre-HF). The study aimed to investigate the association between antihypertensive drug classes and intensity with probability of NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) improvement and risk of cardiovascular events among pre-HF hypertensive patients. Utilizing the data from SPRINT, we included pre-HF hypertensive patients, identified by NT-proBNP ≥125 pg/mL at baseline. NT-proBNP improvement is defined as a reduction of ≥50% to a level below 125 pg/mL. A total of 3293 patients (mean age: 71.9 years; female: 43.8%) were included. NT-proBNP improvement was observed in 415 patients (12.6%) over 1-year follow up. Thiazide-type diuretics users were associated with a higher likelihood of NT-proBNP improvement (odds ratio [OR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.70), a lower risk of HF (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.78) and primary composite outcome (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57-0.89). ACEI/ARB users were only associated with a lower risk of primary composite outcome (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.63-0.99). In contrast, beta-blockers users were associated with a lower likelihood of NT-proBNP improvement (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.34-0.55), while a higher risk of HF (HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.21-2.64) and primary composite outcome (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.18-1.87). These associations varied across subgroups of different drug intensities. This post hoc analysis supports the use of thiazide-type diuretics and ACEI/ARB for prevention of cardiovascular events. The use of beta-blockers is associated with an increased risk of HF and primary outcomes, which requires further validation. Association between antihypertensive drug classes and intensity with NT-proBNP improvement and long-term clinical outcome.

Epidemiology of Asymptomatic Pre-heart Failure: a Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To quantify the prevalence of asymptomatic pre-heart failure (pre-HF), progression to more severe stages, and associated mortality.

RECENT FINDINGS

A systematic review was conducted between 01 January 2010 and 12 March 2020 (PROSPERO: CRD42020176141). Data of interest included prevalence, disease progression, and mortality rates. In total, 1030 sources were identified, of which, 12 reported on pre-HF (using the ACC/AHA definition for stage B HF) and were eligible. Prevalence estimates of pre-HF ranged from 11 to 42.7% (10 sources) with higher estimates found in the elderly, in patients with hypertension, and in men. Three studies reported on disease progression with follow-up ranging from 13 months to 7 years. The incidence of symptomatic HF (HF/advanced HF) ranged from 0.63 to 9.8%, and all-cause mortality from 1.6 to 5.4%. Further research is required to investigate whether early detection and intervention can slow or stop the progression from asymptomatic to symptomatic HF.

Arterial Hypertension and Cardiopulmonary Function: The Value of a Combined Cardiopulmonary and Echocardiography Stress Test

Arterial hypertension (AH) is a global burden and the leading risk factor for mortality worldwide. Haemodynamic abnormalities, longstanding neurohormonal and inflammatory activation, which are commonly observed in patients with AH, promote cardiac structural remodeling ultimately leading to heart failure (HF) if blood pressure values remain uncontrolled. While several epidemiological studies have confirmed the strong link between AH and HF, the pathophysiological processes underlying this transition remain largely unclear. The combined cardiopulmonary-echocardiography stress test (CPET-ESE) represents a precious non-invasive aid to detect alterations in patients at the earliest stages of HF. The opportunity to study the response of the cardiovascular system to exercise, and to differentiate central from peripheral cardiovascular maladaptations, makes the CPET-ESE an ideal technique to gain insights into the mechanisms involved in the transition from AH to HF, by recognizing alterations that might be silent at rest but influence the response to exercise. Identifications of these subclinical alterations might allow for a better risk stratification in hypertensive patients, facilitating the recognition of those at higher risk of evolution towards established HF. This may also lead to the development of novel preventive strategies and help tailor medical treatment. The purpose of this review is to summarise the potential advantages of using CPET-ESE in the characterisation of hypertensive patients in the cardiovascular continuum.

Risk factors for asymptomatic echocardiographic abnormalities that predict symptomatic heart failure

Aims

Risk factors for asymptomatic echocardiographic abnormalities that predict symptomatic heart failure (HF) may provide insight into early mechanisms of HF pathogenesis. We examined risk factors associated with asymptomatic echocardiographic structural, systolic, and diastolic abnormalities, separately and in combination, and interactions between risk factors, in the prospective community‐based SCReening Evaluation of the Evolution of New HF (SCREEN‐HF) Study cohort of 3190 participants at increased risk of cardiovascular disease.

Methods and results

Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 60 years with one or more of hypertension, diabetes, ischaemic heart disease, valvular heart disease, abnormal heart rhythm, cerebrovascular disease, or renal impairment. Exclusion criteria were known HF, ejection fraction < 50%, or >mild valve abnormality. Structural, systolic, and diastolic echocardiographic abnormalities were defined according to the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study criteria, and risk factors for asymptomatic structural, systolic, and diastolic abnormalities were identified using logistic regression analysis. In multivariable analysis, increased body mass index (BMI), non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug therapy, and alcohol intake were risk factors for isolated structural abnormality, whereas male gender, increased heart rate, atrial fibrillation (AF), angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor therapy, and obstructive sleep apnoea were associated with a lower risk. Moreover, male gender, smoking, increased systolic blood pressure, and physical inactivity were risk factors for isolated systolic abnormality, whereas increased pulse pressure and antihypertensive therapy were associated with a lower risk. Furthermore, increased age, blood pressure, amino‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide level, and warfarin therapy (associated with AF) were risk factors for isolated diastolic abnormality, whereas increased heart rate and triglyceride level (associated with BMI) were associated with a lower risk. The association of increased heart rate with lower risk of structural and diastolic abnormalities was independent of β‐blocker therapy. Interactions between risk factors differed for structural, systolic, and diastolic abnormalities.

Conclusions

The different risk factors for asymptomatic structural, systolic, and diastolic abnormalities that predict symptomatic HF, and the interactions between risk factors, illustrate how these structural, systolic, and diastolic abnormalities represent unique trajectories that lead to symptomatic HF. Improved understanding of these trajectories may assist in the design of HF prevention strategies.

The Incremental Prognostic Value of E/(e'×s') Ratio in Non-ST-Segment Elevated Acute Coronary Syndrome

It has been shown that the E/(e’×s’) index, which associates a marker of diastolic function (E/e’, early transmitral/diastolic mitral annulus velocity ratio) and a parameter that explores LV systolic performance (s’, systolic mitral annulus velocity), is a good predictor of outcome in acute anterior myocardial infarction. There are no studies that have investigated the prognostic value of E/(e’×s’) in a non-ST-segment elevated acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) population. Echocardiography was performed in 307 consecutive hospitalized patients with NSTE-ACS and succesful percutaneous coronary intervention, before discharge and six weeks after. The primary endpoint consisted of cardiac death or readmission due to re-infarction or heart failure. During the follow-up period (25.4 ± 3 months), cardiac events occurred in 106 patients (34.5%). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified E/(e’×s’) at discharge as the best independent predictor of composite outcome. The optimal cut-off value was 1.63 (74% sensitivity, 67% specificity). By multivariate Cox regression analysis, E/(e’×s’) was the only independent predictor of cardiac events. Kaplan–Meier analysis identified that patients with an initial E/(e’×s’) > 1.63 that worsened after six weeks presented the worst prognosis regarding composite outcome, readmission, and cardiac death (all p < 0.001). In conclusion, in NSTE-ACS, E/(e’×s’) is a powerful predictor of clinical outcome, particularly if it is accompanied by worsening after 6-weeks.

[Why not integrate the spectral tissue Doppler E/(e'xs') in the multiparametric assessment of cardiovascular diseases by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography?]

Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography is based on a multiparametric approach which includes the spectral tissue Doppler-derived E/e'. Recently, a new Doppler index, E/(e'xs'), which combines E/e' with a spectral tissue Doppler-derived marker of systolic function, s', has been proposed in noninvasive assessment of left ventricular myocardial dysfunction. Current literature provides evidence that E/(e'xs') has good correlation with NT proBNP levels and invasive left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, both used as markers of left ventricular myocardial dysfunction, irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction and wall motion abnormalities. More specifically, E/(e'xs') has good diagnostic accuracy in patients with intermediate values for E/e' (8 to 15). Average E/(e'xs')>1.6 is reported to predict invasive left ventricular end-diastolic pressure>15mmHg with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 85%. Current literature provides evidence that E/(e'xs') could offer better prognostic information than E/e' in patients with systolic heart failure and heart failure with normal ejection fraction, as well as in patients with asymptomatic heart disease. A few clinical studies also suggest that E/(e'xs') could predict recurrence of atrial fibrillation after cardioversion and left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction. Further experimental and clinical investigation is critically needed to determine the role of this under-recognized tissue Doppler index in noninvasive assessment of cardiovascular diseases, in particular heart failure with normal ejection fraction.