Circulating sphingolipids and relationship to cardiac remodelling before and following a low-energy diet in asymptomatic Type 2 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogenous multi-system syndrome with limited efficacious treatment options. The prevalence of Type 2 diabetes (T2D) continues to rise and predisposes patients to HFpEF, and HFpEF remains one of the biggest challenges in cardiovascular medicine today. Novel therapeutic targets are required to meet this important clinical need. Deep phenotyping studies including -OMIC analyses can provide important pathogenic information to aid the identification of such targets. The aims of this study were to determine; 1) the impact of a low-energy diet on plasma sphingolipid/ceramide profiles in people with T2D compared to healthy controls and, 2) if the change in sphingolipid/ceramide profile is associated with reverse cardiovascular remodelling.

METHODS

Post-hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial (NCT02590822) including adults with T2D with no cardiovascular disease who completed a 12-week low-energy (∼810 kcal/day) meal-replacement plan (MRP) and matched healthy controls (HC). Echocardiography, cardiac MRI and a fasting blood for lipidomics were undertaken pre/post-intervention. Candidate biomarkers were identified from case-control comparison (fold change > 1.5 and statistical significance p < 0.05) and their response to the MRP reported. Association between change in biomarkers and change indices of cardiac remodelling were explored.

RESULTS

Twenty-four people with T2D (15 males, age 51.1 ± 5.7 years), and 25 HC (15 male, 48.3 ± 6.6 years) were included. Subjects with T2D had increased left ventricular (LV) mass:volume ratio (0.84 ± 0.13 vs. 0.70 ± 0.08, p < 0.001), increased systolic function but impaired diastolic function compared to HC. Twelve long-chain polyunsaturated sphingolipids, including four ceramides, were downregulated in subjects with T2D at baseline. Three sphingomyelin species and all ceramides were inversely associated with LV mass:volume. There was a significant increase in all species and shift towards HC following the MRP, however, none of these changes were associated with reverse cardiac remodelling.

CONCLUSION

The lack of association between change in sphingolipids/ceramides and reverse cardiac remodelling following the MRP casts doubt on a causative role of sphingolipids/ceramides in the progression of heart failure in T2D.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02590822.

Biomarkers for Heart Failure Prediction and Prevention

Heart failure (HF) is a global pandemic affecting over 64 million people worldwide. Its prevalence is on an upward trajectory, with associated increasing healthcare expenditure. Organizations including the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) have identified HF prevention as an important focus. Recently, the ACC/AHA/Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA) Guidelines on heart failure were updated with a new Class IIa, Level of Evidence B recommendation for biomarker-based screening in patients at risk of developing heart failure. In this review, we evaluate the studies that have assessed the various roles and contributions of biomarkers in the prediction and prevention of heart failure. We examined studies that have utilized biomarkers to detect cardiac dysfunction or abnormality for HF risk prediction and screening before patients develop clinical signs and symptoms of HF. We also included studies with biomarkers on prognostication and risk prediction over and above existing HF risk prediction models and studies that address the utility of changes in biomarkers over time for HF risk. We discuss studies of biomarkers to guide management and assess the efficacy of prevention strategies and multi-biomarker and multimodality approaches to improve risk prediction.

Reclassification of Pre-Heart Failure Stages Using Cardiac Biomarkers: The ARIC Study

BACKGROUND

The recent heart failure (HF) guideline recommends the inclusion of cardiac biomarkers in defining Stage B HF.

OBJECTIVES

The authors evaluated the impact of incorporating cardiac biomarkers to reclassify HF in 5,324 participants (mean age: 75.8 years) without prevalent HF enrolled in the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) study and assessed prognosis of Stage B using cardiac biomarkers.

METHODS

Using N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (<125 pg/mL or ≥125 pg/mL), high-sensitivity troponin T (<14 ng/L or ≥14 ng/L), and abnormal cardiac structure/function by echocardiography, individuals were classified as Stage Anew and Stage Bnew HF, respectively. Stage Bnew was further evaluated as elevated biomarker only, abnormal echocardiogram only, and abnormalities in both (echo + biomarker). The authors assessed risk for incident HF and all-cause death using Cox regression.

RESULTS

Overall, 4,326 (81.3%) individuals were classified as Stage Bnew with 1,123 (21.1%) meeting criteria for elevated biomarkers only. Compared with Stage Anew, Stage Bnew was associated with increased risk for incident HF (HR: 3.70 [95% CI: 2.58-5.30]) and death (HR: 1.94 [95% CI: 1.53-2.46]). Stage Bbiomarkers only and Stage Becho only were associated with increased HF risk, whereas Stage Bbiomarkers only was also associated with increased death. Stage Becho+biomarker had the highest risk for HF (HR: 6.34 [95% CI: 4.37-9.19]) and death (HR: 2.53 [95% CI: 1.98-3.23]).

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating biomarkers based on the new HF guideline reclassified approximately 1 in 5 older adults without prevalent HF to Stage B. The routine measurement of biomarkers can help to identify individuals at higher HF risk who may benefit most from HF prevention efforts.

Prevalence and prognosis of frailty in older patients with stage B heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

AIMS

Frailty in older patients with stage B heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has not been fully explored. We evaluated the prevalence and prognostic significance of frailty in older patients diagnosed with stage B HFpEF.

METHODS

Our prospective cohort study included inpatients aged ≥65 years who were followed up for 3 years. Stage B HFpEF was defined as cardiac structural or functional abnormalities with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% without signs or symptoms. Frailty was assessed using the Fried phenotype. The primary outcome was 3-year all-cause mortality or readmission.

RESULTS

Overall, 520 older inpatients diagnosed with stage B HFpEF [mean ± standard deviation age: 75.5 ± 6.25 years, male: 222 (42.7%)] were included in the study. Of these, 145 (27.9%) were frail. Frail patients were older (78.5 ± 6.23 vs. 74.3 ± 6.22 years, P < 0.001), with a lower body mass index (24.6 ± 3.60 vs. 25.7 ± 3.27 kg/m² , P = 0.001), higher level of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [279 (interquartile range: 112.4, 596) vs. 140 (67.1, 266) pg/mL, P < 0.001], longer timed up-and-go test result (19.9 ± 9.71 vs. 13.3 ± 5.08 s, P < 0.001), and poorer performance in the short physical performance battery (4.1 ± 3.26 vs. 8.2 ± 2.62, P < 0.001), basic activities of daily living (BADL, 4.7 ± 1.71 vs. 5.7 ± 0.57, P < 0.001), and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL, 4.4 ± 2.73 vs. 7.4 ± 1.33, P < 0.001). Frail patients were more likely to have a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score <24 (55.9% vs. 28.8%, P < 0.001) and take more than five medications (64.1% vs. 47.2%, P = 0.001). Frail patients had a higher incidence of all-cause mortality or readmission (62.8% vs. 47.7%, P = 0.002), all-cause readmission (56.6% vs. 45.9%, P = 0.029), and readmission for non-heart failure (55.2% vs. 41.3%, P = 0.004) during the 3-year follow-up, with a 1.53-fold (95%CI 1.11-2.11, P = 0.009) higher risk of all-cause mortality or readmission, a 1.52-fold (95%CI 1.09-2.11, P = 0.014) higher risk of all-cause readmission, and a 1.70-fold (95%CI 1.21-2.38, P = 0.002) higher risk of readmission for non-clinical heart failure, adjusted for sex, age, polypharmacy, Athens Insomnia Scale, MMSE, LVEF, BADL, and IADL.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty is common in elderly patients with stage B HFpEF. Physical frailty, particularly low physical activity, can independently predict the long-term prognosis in these patients.

Epidemiology of Asymptomatic Pre-heart Failure: a Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To quantify the prevalence of asymptomatic pre-heart failure (pre-HF), progression to more severe stages, and associated mortality.

RECENT FINDINGS

A systematic review was conducted between 01 January 2010 and 12 March 2020 (PROSPERO: CRD42020176141). Data of interest included prevalence, disease progression, and mortality rates. In total, 1030 sources were identified, of which, 12 reported on pre-HF (using the ACC/AHA definition for stage B HF) and were eligible. Prevalence estimates of pre-HF ranged from 11 to 42.7% (10 sources) with higher estimates found in the elderly, in patients with hypertension, and in men. Three studies reported on disease progression with follow-up ranging from 13 months to 7 years. The incidence of symptomatic HF (HF/advanced HF) ranged from 0.63 to 9.8%, and all-cause mortality from 1.6 to 5.4%. Further research is required to investigate whether early detection and intervention can slow or stop the progression from asymptomatic to symptomatic HF.

Frailty related all-cause mortality or hospital readmission among adults aged 65 and older with stage-B heart failure inpatients

BACKGROUND

Frailty increases the adverse outcomes of clinical heart failure; however, the relationship between frailty and stage-B heart failure (SBHF) remains unknown. We aimed to explore the epidemiology and predictive value of frailty in older adults with SBHF.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of SBHF inpatients aged 65 years or older who were hospitalized between September 2018 and February 2019 and were followed up for 6 months were included. SBHF was defined as systolic abnormality, structural abnormality (left ventricular enlargement, left ventricular hypertrophy, wall motion abnormalities, valvular heart disease), or prior myocardial infarction. Frailty was assessed by the Fried frailty phenotype. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to explore the independent risk and prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Data of 443 participants (age: 76.1 ± 6.79 years, LVEF: 62.8 ± 4.92%, men: 225 [50.8%], frailty: 109 [24.6%]) were analyzed. During the 6-month follow-up, 83 (18.7%) older SBHF inpatients experienced all-cause mortality or readmission, and 29 (6.5%) of them developed clinical HF. Frail individuals had a 1.78-fold (95%CI: 1.02-3.10, P = 0.041) higher risk of 6-month mortality or readmission and a 2.83-fold (95%CI 1.24-6.47, P = 0.014) higher risk of developing clinical HF, independent of age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty is common in older SBHF inpatients and should be considered to help identify individuals with an increased risk of mortality or readmission, and developing clinical HF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR1800017204 .

Association between electrocardiographic and echocardiographic markers of stage B heart failure and cardiovascular outcome

Aims

The detection of non‐ischaemic (mainly hypertension, diabetes, and obesity) stage B heart failure (SBHF) may facilitate the recognition of those at risk of progression to overt HF and HF prevention. We sought the relationship of specific electrocardiographic (ECG) markers of SBHF to echocardiographic features of SBHF and their prognostic value for development of HF. The ECG markers were Cornell product (Cornell‐P), P‐wave terminal force in lead V1 (PTFV1), ST depression in lead V5 V6 (minSTmV5V6), and increased heart rate. Echocardiographic assessment of SBHF included left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), impaired global longitudinal strain (GLS), and diastolic dysfunction (DD).

Method and results

Asymptomatic subjects ≥65 years without prior cardiac history, but with HF risks, were recruited from the local community. At baseline, they underwent clinical assessment, 12‐lead ECG, and comprehensive echocardiography. New HF was assessed clinically at mean follow‐up of 14 ± 4 months, and echocardiography was repeated in subjects with HF. Of the 447 study subjects (age 71 ± 5, 47% men) with SBHF, 13% had LVH, 32% impaired GLS, and 65% ≥grade I DD (10% ≥grade II DD). Forty were lost to follow‐up. Clinical HF developed in 47 of 407, of whom 20% had echocardiographic LVH, 51% abnormal GLS, and 76% DD at baseline. Baseline LVH and abnormal GLS (not grade I DD) were independently associated with outcomes (clinical HF and cardiovascular death). Cornell‐P and heart rate (not minSTmV5V6 nor PTFV1) were independently associated with LVH, impaired GLS, and DD. Cornell‐P and minSTV5V6 (not heart rate nor PTFV1) were independently associated with outcomes. More ECG abnormalities improved sensitivity, but ECG‐markers were not independent of or incremental to echocardiographic markers to predict HF in SBHF.

Conclusions

In this elderly study population, ECG markers showed low diagnostic sensitivity for non‐ischaemic SBHF and low prognostic value for outcomes. Cornell‐P and minSTmV5V6 had predictive value for outcomes in non‐ischaemic SBHF independent of age, gender, and common comorbidities but were not incremental to echocardiography.

Management of ACCF/AHA Stage A and B patients

Heart failure remains a major health problem in the United States, affecting 5.8 million Americans. Its prevalence continues to rise due to the improved survival of patients. Despite advances in treatment, morbidity and mortality remain very high, with a median survival of about 5 years after the first clinical symptoms. This article describes the causes, classification, and management goals of heart failure in Stages A and B.