Indian Academy of Cytologists Guidelines for Collection, Preparation, Interpretation, and Reporting of Serous Effusion Fluid Samples

Utility of anticoagulation, pre-smearing and post-smearing hemolytic techniques on morphological assessment and reproducibility in fluid cytology

Objective

Knowledge of proper collection, storage, preservation, and processing techniques is critical to ensuring proper handling and analysis of fluid cytology specimens. This study was conducted to determine the effect of anticoagulation, pre-smearing acetic acid treatment technique, and saline rehydration technique on morphological assessment, reproducibility, and reporting in fluid cytology.

Material and Methods

The study was carried out in the cytopathology laboratory over 2 months (April-May 2022), where 100 effusion samples were analyzed. At least 20-40 mL of fluid was collected in heparinized and non-heparinized containers for each patient. Samples were processed in cytospin and stained with Giemsa and Papanicolaou stains. For 70 hemorrhagic specimens, an extra smear was prepared from the sediment and subjected to the saline rehydration technique as per the Indian Academy of Cytologists (IAC) guidelines. Seventy-three hemorrhagic specimens whose quantity received was more than 35 mL were subjected to the pre-smearing technique. These smears were evaluated for (a) the presence or absence of blue background/any other background staining, (b) cellularity, (c) cell morphology and (d) the presence/absence of microclots.

Results

Heparinized samples showed no compromise in cellular morphology or cellularity although a blue background was observed in an occasional case. The pre-smearing technique had less background hemorrhage and preserved cell characteristics. The post-smearing saline rehydration technique did not compromise the cellularity but distorted morphology and showed background staining.

Conclusion

The pre-smearing acetic acid treatment showed better-preserved cellularity and cytomorphology with the absence of background staining when compared to the post-smearing saline rehydration technique.

Root Cause Analysis: Unraveling Common Laboratory Challenges

Diverse errors occur in a pathology laboratory and manual mistakes are the most common. There are various advancements to replace manual procedures with digitized automation techniques. Guidelines and protocols are available to run a standard pathology laboratory. But, even with such attempts to reinforce and strengthen the protocols, the complete elimination of errors is yet not possible. Root cause analysis (RCA) is the best way forward to develop an error-free laboratory, In this review, the importance of RCA, common errors taking place in laboratories, methods to carry out RCA, and its effectiveness are discussed in detail. The review also highlights the potential of RCA to provide long-term quality improvement and efficient laboratory management.

Contemporary art of cell-block preparation: Overview

Cell blocks (CBs) are paraffin-embedded versions of cytology specimens. These versions are contrasted with tissues made from surgical pathology specimens of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. CBs enable various elective ancillary studies of a range of specimens. These studies include the potential to perform molecular tests with the enhanced cytopathological interpretation. CBs are increasingly reported in cytology specimens. The enhanced role of CBs incorporates additives with new markers for immunohistochemistry (IHC), including the multicolored approach to IHC, and the subtractive coordinate immunoreactivity pattern. Even when archived material is retrospectively retrieved, CBs are a major tissue source for many supplementary studies. The CBs have been qualitatively and quantitatively improved. CBs are significant since they have increased molecular markers standardized on FFPE tissue. High-quality CBs can serve as useful additions to cytological smear preparations and touch imprint cytology. Most cytological specimens, such as fine-needle aspirations, cavitary effusion, washings, brushings, and gynecological and non-gynecological liquid specimens, may be used to produce CBs. This review deals with the CB-making process and discusses various historical limitations with an emphasis on recent advances.

Role of cytoblock on pleural effusion for diagnosis of malignant disease

BACKGROUND

Thoracocentesis of pleural effusion is a simple technique for pleural fluid examination through cytology. In addition to cytological examination to assess the nature of pleural fluid content, we can also perform more detailed examinations through cytoblocks of residual fluid. These paraffin-embedded cytoblock samples are important because we can perform examinations as in other bioptic samples. In these samples, immunohistochemical and molecular analyses can be performed.

METHODS

Two hundred fifty-five cytological samples from patients with pleural effusion were examined. In cases in which the presence of malignant cells was identified in the cytological examination, as well as cases that were suspicious but not definitive for the presence of a malignant effusion, a cytoblock was prepared. Histological examination and immunohistochemical analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Among 255 cases with pleural effusion, 152 had the presence of malignant cells and 6 cases were suspicious, but uncertain for the presence of malignant cells, while 86 cases had inflammatory pleural effusion or other pathologies but were not malignant. After histological analysis of the cytoblock and immunohistochemical analysis, we identified 82 malignant tumors of the lung, 8 malignant tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, 15 malignant tumors of the breast, and 6 malignant tumors of the female genital tract, as well as 24 tumors of undetermined origin.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytoblocks are important for the diagnosis of the primary nature of malignant pleural effusions. The highest importance is primary lung tumors, as well as those tumors in which the primary site of the tumor cannot be determined clinically.

Conventional versus Liquid-based Cytology: "Man versus Machine"

Background

Liquid-based cytology (LBC) can improve adequacy, monolayer quality with a clean background compared to conventional smears (CS).

Aims and Objectives

The objective was to compare the quality and diagnostic yield of CS and LBC in routine cytological investigations.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study consisted of 306 samples (255 gynecological, 39 nongynecological, and 12 fine needle aspiration cytology [FNAC]) during a 2-year period (2019-2020). From each patient, two samples were collected in the same manner in the same sitting and processed by CS and LBC (ThinPrep® 2000, Hologic Inc.). Both CS and LBC were compared for adequacy, quality, representativeness, inflammation, hemorrhage, necrosis, preservation, reactive changes, organisms, atypia/dysplasia/malignancy, and preparation/screening time. Statistical analysis was performed.

Results

No statistically significant difference was noted for adequacy, representativeness, reactive changes, preservation, and atypia/dysplasia/malignancy. CS was better in cellularity and diagnosis of inflammation and organisms, whereas LBC had a clean background and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0005).

Conclusions

CS was equivalent to LBC in adequacy, representativeness, reactive changes, and atypia/dysplasia/malignancy. Adequacy comparable to LBC can be achieved in CS by careful sample collection, processing, and screening by trained cytotechnologists. CS was better in detecting organisms and inflammation than LBC. The advantages of LBC were monolayer smear, clean background, and lesser screening time, but the demerit was higher cost and longer processing time. Therefore, LBC is best suited to those laboratories having high sample inadequacy rates, lack of competent cytotechnologists, and no financial constraints. Either man or machine, appropriate and adequate sample collection by trained personnel forms the cornerstone for ensuring adequacy in both CS and LBC.

Diagnostic Utility of Claudin4 and Comparison with BerEp4 as a Marker for Metastatic Adenocarcinoma in Serous Effusions

INTRODUCTION

Fluid cytology for malignant cells is important for diagnosis and staging of malignancies. Morphological overlap between reactive mesothelial cells and adenocarcinoma poses challenges, for which many immunohistochemical markers like BerEp4 and MOC-31 have been used extensively. Claudin4 is a new marker with promising results; however, further studies are required to establish its role as a pan-carcinoma marker in serous effusions. This study aimed to determine the utility of Claudin4 in diagnosing metastatic adenocarcinoma in effusions and comparing its performance with BerEp4.

METHODS

Claudin4 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on effusion cell blocks (n = 60) reported as positive or suspicious for metastatic adenocarcinoma on cytology over a 1-year period and was scored for intensity (0-3) and percentage of positive cells (0-4). The results were compared with BerEp4 IHC and correlated with follow-up. Ten benign effusions were included as negative controls.

RESULTS

Claudin4 IHC was positive in all 60 (100%) cases, irrespective of the primary site. BerEp4 IHC was positive in 58 (96.7%) fluids and negative in 2 (3.3%) cases. All 10 benign effusions were negative for Claudin4 and BerEp4. Claudin4 showed higher intensity and proportion scores as compared to BerEp4 in cases where tumor cells were predominantly singly scattered and was comparable to BerEp4 where tumor cells were arranged in groups. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of Claudin4 in our study was 100%. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of BerEP4 was 96.7%, 100%, 100%, and 83.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Claudin4 IHC staining results were comparable to BerEp4, irrespective of the primary site, and it performed better in cases where tumor cells were predominantly scattered singly.

Categorisation of peritoneal serous effusions using the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology-A study on gynaecological samples

BACKGROUND

Cytology of serous effusions is an indispensable diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of non-neoplastic as well as neoplastic effusions, aiding in the categorisation, staging, and prognostication of the patient. This study focuses on reclassifying cases of peritoneal fluid cytology following the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (TIS), highlighting various challenges encountered and adding to the body of data regarding the risk of malignancy (ROM), focussing on peritoneal effusions due to gynaecological causes.

METHODS

Peritoneal effusion samples were retrieved from our department's archives and reclassified according to the TIS. The ROM for each category was calculated based on available surgical follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 818 peritoneal effusions were studied. Following the definitions and guidelines of the TIS, the cases were reclassified with 125 (15.2%) in the category of non-diagnostic (ND), 595 (72.7%) as negative for malignancy (NFM), 26 (3.2%) as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), 12 (1.5%) as suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and 60 (7.3%) as malignant (MAL). The respective ROM values for each category were 16.9%, 12.1%, 50%, 80%, and 100%, respectively. By considering the MAL and SFM groups as positive, and the ND, NFM, and AUS groups as negative, the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were determined as 85.2%, 36.7%, 99.1%, 91.7%, and 84.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritoneal cytology categorisation following the proposed TIS offered a practical approach for categorisation of the fluids received. The ROMs reported in our study were mostly concordant with those published according to the TIS.

Cytomorphological analysis of effusion fluids for detection of malignant cells in a tertiary care hospital in northern India

INTRODUCTION

All body cavities are lined by monolayered mesothelial cells and contain a minimal amount of fluid for lubrication and for protecting the underlying viscera. The peritoneal, pleural, cerebrospinal, sputum, urine, and pericardial fluids comprise the major chunk of body fluids.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was conducted in the Department of Pathology of a tertiary care hospital in northern India, over a period of 1 year, from January 2021 to December 2021. A total of 241 samples were included in the study.

RESULTS

Out of the 241 samples studied, 99 were peritoneal fluid, 94 were pleural fluids, 29 were CSF, and 18 were sputum samples. Maximum number of patients affected were in the age group of 41-50 years. Female preponderance was seen with male to female ratio of 1:1.7. A total of 143/241 cases (59.33%) were of transudative nature and 98/241 (27.8%) cases were exudative. Out of 241 cases, 43 (17.84%) were neoplastic, 190 (78.83%) were non-neoplastic, four (1.65%) were suspicious for malignancy, and four (1.65%) were where no opinion was possible. Peritoneal fluid was the most frequently encountered fluid accounting for 99 cases (41.07%). Adenocarcinoma was the most common malignancy accounting for 29 cases (67.44%) out of 43 malignant effusions in the present study.

CONCLUSION

Cytological evaluation of body fluids is of significant utility in diagnostic medicine as it allows us to distinguish between benign and malignant etiologies and at the same time offers rapid diagnosis and staging of metastatic disease.

Diagnosis of Pleural Fluid Effusions by Cell Block and Pleural Biopsy - A Comparative Study

Background

Cytological smear and cell block are commonly used to diagnose pleural fluid effusion. However, there is a paucity of information in the literature where a comparison between a cytological smear and a cell block with corresponding pleural biopsy has been done. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of cytological smears, cell blocks, and pleural biopsy for the diagnosis of malignant tumors.

Material and Methods

In this cross-sectional study, analysis of successive pleural fluid samples received by the department was done. The sample was divided into equal halves of 5 ml each. One was used for conventional smear and the second was used for the preparation of cell block. The cell block was prepared by centrifuging the specimen of fluid at 2500 rpm for 15 min. A pleural biopsy was obtained by using Cope's pleural biopsy needle.

Results

A total of n = 50 cases were included in the study. A total of n = 8 cases were diagnosed as malignant by cell smear and n = 4 cases were suspicious for malignancy. By cell block, n = 10 cases of malignancy were diagnosed and n = 1 case was suspicious for malignancy. By biopsy, n = 11 cases were diagnosed as malignant and n = 1 case was suspicious for malignancy. Out of the total, n = 2 cases were diagnosed as squamous cell carcinoma by biopsy; one case was diagnosed by cell block; and the other was reported as suspicious for malignancy.

Conclusion

The study shows that cell blocks are complementary to the cell smear technique in over diagnosis and categorization of benign as well as malignant cells. The cell blocks were more useful in the diagnosis of malignancy because of better preserved architectural patterns as seen in corresponding histopathology sections. It, therefore, appears that the cell blocks are a perfect fit to bridge the cytology and histopathology.

Application of the international system for reporting serous fluid cytopathology on reporting various body fluids; experience of a tertiary care hospital

Objectives:

Cytological examination of effusion sample is a preliminary and minimally invasive method for the diagnosis of body fluids. Recently, the International System For Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC) and the Indian Academy of Cytologist (IAC) have published guidelines for reporting effusion cytology and calculating the risks of malignancy (ROMs) for each defined category. We report our 2 years of experience in reclassifying and assessing the feasibility of applying ISRFSC and IAC categories to effusion fluid and to provide an estimate of the risk of malignancy for each diagnostic category.

Material and Methods:

Cytological reports of patients from January 2019 to December 2020 were retrieved and reclassified into a five-tiered classification scheme as per ISRSFC guidelines. Cellblock and immunohistochemistry were performed in selected cases. Clinico radiological and histopathological information were obtained and correlated with the cytological findings wherever available.

Results:

In the study, 652 cases were included during the 2 years. Out of these, 328 (50.3%) were women and 314 (47.3%) were men. Patient’s ages ranged between 2 92 years with a mean age of 47.4 years. There were 366 (56.1%) cases of ascitic fluid followed by 262 (40.1%) cases of pleural fluid and 24 (3.8%) cases of pericardial fluid in the analysis. Of all the cases, 13 (2%) were non-diagnostic (ND), 464 (71.6%) were negative for malignant (NFM) cells, 16 (2.4%) were atypia of uncertain significance, 31 (4.7%) were suspicious of malignancy, and 125 (19.3%) were malignant. Cellblock was prepared in 65 cases. Lung cancer followed by breast cancer was the most common malignancies involving the pleural effusion and ovarian cancer was the most common cause of peritoneal effusion. ROM for each diagnostic category was 23% for ND, 25% for NFM, 56% for the atypical category, 80.6% in suspicious, and 90% were for positive for malignancy category.

Conclusion:

The use of a five-tiered system as per the ISRFC and IAC guidelines are feasible for the standardized reporting of effusion samples, thus avoiding subjective variation of reporting.

Serous fluid: Reactive conditions

This chapter highlights the steps that would help to analyze any fluid. It highlights importance of knowing gross analysis of fluid along with biochemical information. These parameters along with clinical information are very important in arriving at a differential diagnosis. Morphologic appearances in the fluid can often become challenging and occasionally reactive conditions can reveal changes that may mimic malignancies. This chapter provides not only a framework of approach to assessment of fluid cytology but also shows how to distinguish some of the challenging reactive conditions from the diagnosis of carcinoma. The chapter also utilizes two cases to demonstrate approach to reactive conditions. This review article will be incorporated finally as one of the chapters in CMAS (CytoJournal Monograph/Atlas Series) #2. It is modified slightly from the chapter by the initial authors in the first edition of Cytopathologic Diagnosis of Serous Fluids.

Approach to Diagnostic Cytopathology of Serous Effusions

Collection of most serous fluids from various effusions is a relatively simple procedure. Because of this, serous fluids are commonly submitted for pathologic examination including cytopathologic evaluation by various clinical institutions. As a consequence, even a general pathology laboratory which may not have expertise with highly trained cytopathologist would be confronted with serous fluids for cytologic evaluation.

However, cytopathologic evaluation of serous fluids is complex as compared to evaluation of fine needle aspiration cytology. This signifies the fact that all pathologists, irrespective of subspeciality cytopathology training and level of subspeciality expertise, should be conversant with the diagnostic challenges and pitfalls of effusion fluid cytology.

Although, majority of effusions are due to reactive and non-neoplastic etiologies, cancer is one of the causes of an effusion as a manifestation of advanced cancer. Detecting neoplastic cells in effusion specimens in most of clinical settings is related to the advanced status of the disease, which usually is equivalent to incurable stage. Thus, interpretation of cytopathology as positive for cancer cell is highly critical in planning the trajectory of the clinical management with an obvious negative impact of false positive interpretation.

Apart from cancer, effusions may be secondary to hemodynamic pathologies such as heart failure, hypoalbuminemia, cirrhosis etc. in addition to the different inflammatory conditions including parasitic infestations, bacterial, fungal, or viral infections, and other non-neoplastic etiologies including collagen diseases. Due to the cytomorphologic overlap of reactive mesothelial cells with malignant cells, general cytologic criteria for diagnosis of malignancy in single cells cannot be applied in most of the effusion specimens. This challenge is further amplified because of surface tension related phenomenon which ‘round up’ the cells after exfoliation in serous fluids. As a result, the native shapes of cancer cells cannot be a guiding feature. Thus the cytomorphologic features of cancer cells in serous fluids may not be same as seen in routine cytopathology of exfoliative, brushing, and fine-needle aspiration specimens.

The cancer cells may continue to proliferate after exfoliation in the nutrient rich effusion fluids and may form proliferation spheres. It is crucial to consider these factors when interpreting effusion cytology. Amongst malignant effusions, adenocarcinomas are the most common cause of metastatic cancers, but almost any type of malignancy including melanomas, hematopoietic neoplasms, sarcomas, and mesotheliomas may involve serous cavities. The interpreter must be aware of the wide range of the cytomorphologic appearances of reactive mesothelial cells in effusion fluids. It is essential to understand these and other nuances related to effusion fluid cytology. Understanding potential pitfalls during various stages from processing to application of ancillary studies would increase the diagnostic accuracy and minimize atypical interpretations and false positivity.

Analytical and post analytical phase of an ISO 15189:2012 Certified cytopathology laboratory-a five year institutional experience

Objective:

Analytical and post analytical phase are integral part of total quality management system and include steps from submission of slides till reports are dispatched. The present study was conducted to analyze the analytical and post analytical phase of the ISO15189:2012 certified cytopathology laboratory. It was also intended to study the various errors which were encountered and steps taken to reduce these discrepancies.

Methods:

The study included all documents of quality program from 1 November 2014 till 31 Oct 2019 in medical institute situated in north Himalayan region of India. All the data was recorded and analyzed for analytical and post analytical phase.

Results:

The number of samples received in cytopathology lab was 21,566 with total quality errors of 5.19%. Out of these pre-analytical errors were 55%, analytical 10.5% and post analytical errors constituted 34.4%. The maximum errors detected were due to typographical errors followed by delayed turnaround time. Cyto-histopathological discordance was 10.5% in non-gynecological cases and 2.2% in gynecological cases.

Conclusion:

Analytical and post analytical phase analysis is essential to minimize the errors and improve the quality of cytopathology lab. Cyto-histopathological correlation is valuable for continuous data tracking in the cytopathology with analytical errors analysis. Maintenance of external, internal quality program, turnaround time with documentation, continuous training and communication with clinician is fundamental for quality improvement in any cytopathology lab. Acknowledgement of nonconformance with root cause analysis and sincere efforts to minimize them is the basic key for successful quality management.

Cardiac tamponade and massive pleural effusion in a young COVID-19-positive adult

COVID-19 has a broad spectrum of cardiac manifestations, and cardiac tamponade leading to cardiogenic shock is a rare presentation. A 30-year-old man with a history of COVID-19-positive, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) done 1 week ago and who was home-quarantined, came to the emergency department with palpitations, breathlessness and orthopnoea. His ECG showed sinus tachycardia with low-voltage complexes, chest X-ray showed cardiomegaly and left pleural effusion and two-dimensional echocardiography showed large pericardial effusion with features suggestive of cardiac tamponade. He was taken up for emergency pericardiocentesis which showed haemorrhagic pericardial fluid. Intercostal drainage insertion was done for left-sided large pleural effusion. After ruling out all the other causes for haemorrhagic pericardial effusion, the patient was started on colchicine, steroids, ibuprofen and antibiotics to which he responded. Both pericardial and pleural effusions resolved completely on follow-up.

'Rollover' abdominal paracentesis versus standard technique: protocol of a crossover randomized comparative trial

The sensitivity of single abdominal paracentesis for diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with malignant ascites is 40-70%. Tumor cells shed from the peritoneum settle preferentially in certain recesses of the peritoneum. We aim to compare the standard technique of abdominal paracentesis versus a rollover technique in a randomized crossover study to assess the cytological yield in patients suspected to have peritoneal carcinomatosis. Each patient will serve as their own control and the outcome assessor (cytopathologist) will be blinded to the method of paracentesis performed. The primary objective will be to compare the tumor cell positivity between the standard paracentesis group and the rollover group among enrolled patients. Clinical Trial registration: CTRI/2020/06/025887 and NCT04232384.

Application of Indian Academy of Cytologists Guidelines for Reporting Serous Effusions: An Institutional Experience

Background:

Recently, the Indian Academy of Cytologists (IAC) has published the guidelines for interpretation and reporting of serous effusions. Till date, there are no studies on its applicability.

Aims:

The present study was carried out to assess the feasibility of applying the IAC reporting categories to effusions, determine the frequency, and provide an estimate of the risk of malignancy (ROM) for individual diagnostic categories.

Materials and Methods:

All cases of serous effusion fluids reported in the year 2019 were retrieved from the archives and reassigned as per the IAC diagnostic categories. The clinical and histopathological follow-up information was obtained wherever possible.

Results:

A total of 1340 effusion samples were received from 1085 patients. There were 561 (51.7%) males and 524 (48.3%) females. Majority were pleural (1066, 79.5%), followed by peritoneal (187, 14%) and pericardial (87, 6.5%) effusions. The age ranged from 7 months to 92 years. There were 35 (2.6%) samples in category 1 (non-diagnostic), 954 (71.2%) in category 2 (benign), 17 (1.3%) in category 3 (atypical), 59 (4.4%) in category 4 (suspicious for malignancy) and 275 (20.5%) in category 5 (malignant). The estimated ROM in serous effusion samples was 20% for category 1, 16.7% for category 2, 50% for category 3, 94.4% for category 4 and 100% for category 5.

Conclusions:

The categorization of serous effusion cytology samples as per the IAC diagnostic categories and as per the reporting format developed by the IAC is feasible and the management recommendations are mostly appropriate.