Health-related quality of life assessment for head-and-neck cancer patients during and at 3 months after radiotherapy - A prospective, analytical questionnaire-based study

A narrative review of the relationship between head and neck cancer and obstructive sleep apnea: Clinical studies and statistical analysis

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an underestimated and overlooked comorbidity in head and neck cancer (HNC) care. Refining HNC-OSA management requires an improved grasp of the HNC-OSA relationship. Thus, this paper reviews the current course of HNC therapy, causal and associative relationships before and after treatment, and statistical methods quantifying HNC-OSA interactions. This evaluation serves a dual purpose: to support oncologists and sleep physicians in improving the treatment outcomes of patients undergoing HNC treatment by considering OSA as a comorbidity and to assist researchers in selecting suitable analytical models for investigating the correlation between OSA and HNC. The investigation confirms a positive correlation between the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and primary tumor size, consistent with prior findings. Case studies also reported new evidence of lipoma and head-neck tumors triggering OSA, and sleep apnea surgery prompting tumor development. This paper provides an overview of existing statistical models and offers suggestions for model selection and a framework for designing experiments that delve into research questions surrounding the link between OSA and HNC across various stages of cancer treatment. Despite progress, understanding the HNC-OSA interplay remains incomplete due to limited histological, molecular, and clinical data. Future studies with longitudinal data are crucial for comprehensive insights.

Pre- and Post-Operative Quality of Life in Patients with Osteoradionecrosis of the Jaw

Osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORNJ) is a feared complication following radiation therapy performed for oncological treatment of head and neck cancers (HNC). To date, there is no clear evidence regarding the impact of surgical treatment of ORNJ on the quality of life (QoL) of affected patients. However, understanding the significance of the surgical treatment approach and its effects on QoL is an essential factor in the decision-making process for optimal, individualized therapy. In this prospective clinical study, QoL was assessed in relation to health related QoL (HRQoL) and oral health related QoL (OHQoL) before and after surgical treatment of ORNJ using standardized questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-HN35, OHIP-14). The overall QoL scores as well as individual domains of the collected scales regarding functional and symptom-related complaints were statistically analyzed. Subgroups concerning age, gender, different risk factors and type of ORNJ therapy were compared using Kruskal Wallis test. In addition, clinical and demographic patient data were collected and analyzed. QoL improvement correlated with the type of surgical ORNJ and the length of hospitalization. Better QoL scores were achieved post-operatively regarding different symptoms like pain, swallowing and mouth opening. Long-term effects of radiation therapy remained visibly restrictive to QoL and worsen over time.

Prospective study on health-related quality of life, oral mucositis and oral health on during treatment of head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Few studies have examined health related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) during the treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) with even fewer focusing on the impact of oral mucositis (OM) on HR-QoL. Studies performed during treatment of HNC makes it possible to follow fluctuations in HR-QoL, OM and other treatment related side effects. The aim was to prospectively analyze HR-QoL, changes in clinical variables and the impact of OM on HR-QoL during HNC treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were recruited before commencing curative cancer treatment and were given professional oral care weekly during oncologic treatment. HR-QoL was reported before, during (week 2, 4 and 6) and three months after treatment using the EORTC Quality of Life questionnaires C30 and H&N35 and the stimulated whole salivary secretion rate was determined at the same time-points. OM (erythema and ulceration) was registered using the Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS), at baseline, weekly during treatment and post treatment. Differences in HR-QoL between different timepoints were analyzed. To analyze the impact of OM on HR-QoL the patients were categorized into two groups: no/mild OM (OMAS ulceration score 0-1) or severe OM (OMAS ulceration score ≥ 2) and HR-QoL was compared between the two OM groups at three timepoints during treatment.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients (43 men, 14 women), with a mean age of 58 years were included. Patients reported progressively impaired HR-QoL, with peak issues noted at weeks 4 and 6, particularly in social eating, senses, appetite loss, sticky saliva, and decreasing salivary secretion rates were determined. Patients with severe OM reported worse HR-QoL compared to those with no/mild OM. Persistent problems 3 months post treatment were appetite loss, dry mouth, senses (smell and taste) and problems with social eating.

CONCLUSION

Patients experienced exacerbated symptoms and problems weeks 4 and 6 of oncological treatment, especially among those with severe OM, stressing the importance of clinically monitoring the patients to reduce and alleviate their symptoms. Persistent problems three months post treatment are likely associated with the reduced salivary secretion rate indicating that patients should be monitored also after completed oncological treatment.

Neurocognitive function following (chemo)radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer and other head and neck cancers: A systematic review

When radiotherapy is used in the treatment of head and neck cancers, the brain commonly receives incidental doses of radiotherapy with potential for neurocognitive changes and subsequent impact on quality of life. This has not been widely investigated to date. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Psycinfo Info and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) electronic databases was conducted. Of 2077 records screened, 20 were eligible comprising 1308 patients. There were no randomised studies and 73.3% of included patients were from single center studies. IMRT was delivered in 72.6% of patients, and chemotherapy used in 61%. There was considerable heterogeneity in methods. Narrative synthesis was therefore carried out. Most studies demonstrated inferior neurocognitive outcomes when compared to control groups at 12 months and beyond radiotherapy. Commonly affected neurocognitive domains were memory and language which appeared related to radiation dose to hippocampus, temporal lobe, and cerebellum. Magnetic Resonance Imaging could be valuable in the detection of early microstructural and functional changes, which could be indicative of future neurocognitive changes. In studies investigating quality of life, the presence of neurocognitive impairment was associated with inferior quality of life outcomes. (Chemo)radiotherapy for head and neck cancer appears to be associated with a risk of long-term neurocognitive impairment. Few studies were identified, with substantial variation in methodology, thus limiting conclusions. High quality large prospective head and neck cancer studies using standardised, sensitive, and reliable neurocognitive tests are needed.

Quality of life and its correlates in pretreatment patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer: A cross-sectional study in Thailand

Background

Locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) can significantly impact the quality of life of patients in various ways. However, several factors can contribute to the decrease in quality of life. In Thailand, there is limited knowledge about the factors that affect the quality of life of patients with LAHNC before they receive treatment.

Objective

This study aimed to examine the correlations between Palliative Performance Scale (PPS), family income, body mass index (BMI), age, comorbidity index, and the quality of life of patients with LAHNC before they undergo treatment.

Methods

A correlational cross-sectional study was conducted, and data were collected from 94 pretreatment patients with LAHNC who were admitted to a cancer center in central Thailand using purposive sampling. The data collection instruments included a demographic data form, a medical record form, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), the Palliative Performance Scale (PPS), and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACT-H&N) version 4. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation, and Spearman's rank correlation were used to analyze the data.

Results

All study participants completed the questionnaire. The results showed that the overall quality of life of the patients was moderate. PPS, family income, and body mass index were moderately positively correlated with quality of life (r = 0.494, p <0.01; r = 0.420, p <0.01; r = 0.339, p <0.01, respectively). Age had a moderate negative correlation with quality of life (r = -0.596, p <0.01), while comorbidity was not significantly associated with quality of life.

Conclusion

The quality of life of patients with LAHNC before treatment was associated with various factors, including PPS, family income, body mass index, and age. These findings highlight the importance of nutritional support before treatment and the need for social support, especially for older adult patients, to improve their quality of life. The results of this study can be valuable for nurses in developing care programs that enhance the quality of life for patients with LAHNC during the pretreatment phase.

Photobiomodulation in the management of oral mucositis for adult head and neck cancer patients receiving irradiation: the LiTEFORM RCT

BACKGROUND

Oral mucositis is a debilitating and painful complication of head and neck cancer irradiation that is characterised by inflammation of the mucous membranes, erythema and ulceration. Oral mucositis affects 6000 head and neck cancer patients per year in England and Wales. Current treatments have not proven to be effective. International studies suggest that low-level laser therapy may be an effective treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of low-level laser therapy in the management of oral mucositis in head and neck cancer irradiation. To identify barriers to and facilitators of implementing low-level laser therapy in routine care.

DESIGN

Placebo-controlled, individually randomised, multicentre Phase III superiority trial, with an internal pilot and health economic and qualitative process evaluations. The participants, outcome assessors and therapists were blinded.

SETTING

Nine NHS head and neck cancer sites in England and Wales.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 87 out of 380 participants were recruited who were aged ≥ 18 years and were undergoing head and neck cancer irradiation with ≥ 60 Gy.

INTERVENTION

Random allocation (1 : 1 ratio) to either low-level laser therapy or sham low-level laser therapy three times per week for the duration of irradiation. The diode laser had the following specifications: wavelength 660 nm, power output 75 mW, beam area 1.5 cm², irradiance 50 mW/cm², exposure time 60 seconds and fluence 3 J/cm². There were 20-30 spots per session. Sham low-level laser therapy was delivered in an identical manner.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The mean Oral Mucositis Weekly Questionnaire-Head and Neck Cancer score at 6 weeks following the start of irradiation. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 231 patients were screened and, of these, 87 were randomised (low-level laser therapy arm, n = 44; sham arm, n = 43). The mean age was 59.4 years (standard deviation 8.8 years) and 69 participants (79%) were male. The mean Oral Mucositis Weekly Questionnaire-Head and Neck Cancer score at 6 weeks was 33.2 (standard deviation 10) in the low-level laser therapy arm and 27.4 (standard deviation 13.8) in the sham arm.

LIMITATIONS

The trial lacked statistical power because it did not meet the recruitment target. Staff and patients willingly participated in the trial and worked hard to make the LiTEFORM trial succeed. However, the task of introducing, embedding and sustaining new low-level laser therapy services into a complex care pathway proved challenging. Sites could deliver low-level laser therapy to only a small number of patients at a time. The administration of low-level laser therapy was viewed as straightforward, but also time-consuming and sometimes uncomfortable for both patients and staff, particularly those staff who were not used to working in a patient's mouth.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial had a robust design but lacked power to be definitive. Low-level laser therapy is relatively inexpensive. In contrast with previous trials, some patients found low-level laser therapy sessions to be difficult. The duration of low-level laser therapy sessions is, therefore, an important consideration. Clinicians experienced in oral cavity work most readily adapt to delivering low-level laser therapy, although other allied health professionals can be trained. Blinding the clinicians delivering low-level laser therapy is feasible. There are important human resource, real estate and logistical considerations for those setting up low-level laser therapy services.

FUTURE WORK

Further well-designed randomised controlled trials investigating low-level laser therapy in head and neck cancer irradiation are needed, with similar powered recruitment targets but addressing the recruitment challenges and logistical findings from this research.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered as ISRCTN14224600.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research ( NIHR ) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 46. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Acute Impact of Cancer Treatment on Head and Neck Cancer Patients: FIT4TREATMENT

Simple Summary

Head and neck cancer treatment causes toxicities that compromise health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and treatment efficacy. Exercise training (ET) benefits are reported for many cancer types. The aim of our prospective observational study was to analyse acute treatment’s impact and ET preferences. In the pretreatment phase (n = 18), most patients presented low physical function, were moderately malnourished or at risk of malnutrition, and were willing to participate in an ET program. Patients submitted to radical chemoradiotherapy (n = 7) experienced a significant decline in HRQoL and social functioning, an increase in dysphagia severity, a reduction in handgrip strength, and nutritional status deterioration. An ET program may optimize patients’ physical fitness, achieving more efficacy with less toxicity.

Abstract

Head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment’s toxicities impact several health domains. Exercise training (ET) may be beneficial. This prospective observational study (NCT04996147) aimed to analyse the acute impact of HNC curative multimodal treatment on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), nutritional status, physical and cognitive functions, and ET preferences. Eighteen patients with stage III/IV HNC were evaluated at baseline (T0), and 10 patients were evaluated at the end of treatment (T1), 7 of them after radical chemoradiotherapy (rCRT). At T0, the majority referred a good HRQoL on the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (median score: 70.8), were moderately malnourished or at risk of malnutrition (78%), recognized the benefits of an ET program, and were willing to participate (78%). After rCRT, there was worsening in HRQoL (75 vs. 50 score, p = 0.014), dysphagia severity (Eating Assessment Tool: 7 vs. 31, p = 0.027; Functional Oral Intake Scale: 6 vs. 4, p = 0.041), handgrip strength (dominant: 40.9 vs. 35.8 kgf, p = 0.027; nondominant: 37.2 vs. 33.9 kgf, p = 0.043), and nutritional status (Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment: 7 vs. 18, p = 0.028). HNC patients subjected to radical treatment represent a vulnerable population that might benefit from multimodal supportive care strategies including an ET program.

Quality of life in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma undergoing concurrent chemoradiation with once-a-week versus once-every-3-weeks cisplatin

Introduction

This trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of low dose once‐a‐week cisplatin and once‐every‐3‐weeks cisplatin with radiation in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC). The current analysis focuses on the quality of life (QoL) of patients in this trial.

Methods

In this phase III randomized trial, patients with nonmetastatic LAHNSCC were randomized to receive cisplatin 30 mg/m² once‐a‐week or 100 mg/m² once every‐ 3‐weeks concurrently with radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was locoregional control. QoL was a key secondary endpoint. QoL was assessed using EORTC QLQ‐C30 and QLQ‐H&N35. QoL data were assessed at baseline, days 22 and 43 during treatment; and at 6, 12, 24 months. The linear mixed‐effects model was used for longitudinal analysis of QoL to determine the impact of treatment (arm) and time on QoL.

Results

Three hundred patients were enrolled, data of 150 patients with available baseline QoL were analyzed. There was no significant difference in the global health status/QoL of the two treatment arms (p = 0.8664). There was no significant difference in the longitudinal QoL scores between the two treatment arms in all scales except constipation (p = 0.0096), less sexuality (p = 0.0002,), and financial difficulty (p = 0.0219). There was a worsening of the QoL scores in all scales in both arms during treatment, which improved after treatment completion in most scales.

Conclusion

The use of once‐every‐3‐weeks cisplatin did not adversely impact QoL as compared to once‐a‐week cisplatin in combination with radiotherapy in LAHNSCC.

Quality of life in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiation with cisplatin and nimotuzumab versus cisplatin alone - Additional data from a phase 3 trial

INTRODUCTION

The addition of Nimotuzumab to radical chemoradiation (CRT) improved outcomes in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC) undergoing radical CRT in a phase 3 randomized trial. The current study focuses on the quality of life (QoL) of patients in this trial.

METHODS

In this phase III randomized trial, patients with newly diagnosed, nonmetastatic, stage III/IV LAHNSCC of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx were randomized to receive cisplatin 30 mg/m² or cisplatin 30 mg/m² with nimotuzumab once a week with curative radiotherapy. The primary end point of the trial was PFS. The aim of the current study was to compare the QoL between the two arms. QoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 (v3.0) and HN-35 (v1.0). The linear mixed-effects model was used for longitudinal analysis of QoL.

RESULTS

536 patients were randomized in this trial (268 in each arm) and 423 patients were included for QoL analysis. There was a significant change in the global health status QoL scores over time (p = 0.0016) with no difference between the two arms (p = 0.396). On longitudinal analysis there was a significant difference in the QoL scores in most of the function & symptom scales over time, but there was no significant difference in these scores between the two arms. QoL scores for most symptom scales worsened during treatment and improved thereafter in both arms.

CONCLUSION

The addition of nimotuzumab to cisplatin based chemoradiation in LAHNSCC improved PFS, LRC and DFS without negatively impacting QoL.

Change in Physical Performance Correlates with Decline in Quality of Life and Frailty Status in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiation with and without Chemotherapy

Simple Summary

Quality of life (QoL) scores and frailty status are becoming increasingly important criterion with implications on both how patients are treated and survival in head and neck cancer (HNC). Despite this, physicians lack tools to identify patients who are at risk of suffering declines in QoL and becoming frail following treatment. Therefore, we investigated whether functional decline, as measured by a series of physical tests called the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), correlated with a reduction in QoL and increased risk of frailty. In the current study, patients who experienced a decline in SPPB scores were significantly more likely to have changes in physical functioning QoL measures as well as transition to frail status following treatment. In conclusion, the SPPB may be a useful tool to identify patients who may benefit from additional rehabilitation in future studies.

Abstract

Patient-reported quality of life (QoL) metrics, frailty status, and physical functioning are emerging concepts in head and neck cancer (HNC) with implications on both treatment decision-making and prognosis. The impact of treatment-related functional decline on QoL and frailty has not been well-characterized in HNC and was the focus of this investigation. Methods: Patients who underwent radiation therapy for HNC from 2018 to 2020 were evaluated as a prospective observational cohort. Functional decline, QoL, and the frailty phenotype were measured via the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) qlq-C30, and Fried Frailty index, respectively. Results: A total of 106 HNC patients were included, 75 of which received concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) and 31 received radiation alone, both with and without surgery. There was a decrease in SPPB overall (p < 0.001) from the beginning to the end of treatment in the CCRT group but not the radiation group (p = 0.43). Change in overall SPPB points following treatment correlated with the decline in physical QoL for both groups (p < 0.05) as well as transition frail status in the CCRT group (p < 0.001) with a trend in the radiation group (p = 0.08). Conclusions: Change in SPPB correlates with QoL and transition to frailty status in patients undergoing definitive CCRT for HNC with similar trends in those receiving radiation alone. Decline in SPPB could potentially be useful in identification of those who may benefit from rehabilitation in future studies.

Quality of life among head and neck cancer treated patients in South India: A cross-sectional study

Background and aim

The impact of oral health related disease and treatment on the patient's overall well-being and functioning is a topic of growing interest in clinical research and practice. Research shows that there is a significant reduction in the quality of life for the patients throughout the treatment of head and neck cancer. Therefore, the aim of the study is to assess the quality of life among treated head and neck cancer patients.

Materials and method

The cross sectional study was conducted among 225 head and neck cancer patients. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC QLQ C-30), Quality Of Life Head and Neck35" (QLQ-HN35) instruments were used to assess their quality of life. The study population was divided into three groups based on the treatment done: Group I (Surgery), Group II (Surgery and Radiotherapy) and Group III (Surgery, Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy). Independent t-test and one way ANOVA test were done to analyze the data.

Results

Trouble with opening mouth (34.66 ​± ​30.58) was one of the highest rated symptoms among the study population. Salivary dysfunction leading to dry mouth (33.33 ​± ​34.06), sticky saliva (33.33 ​± ​26.72) were also found to be severe. Among the three groups, the Global Health Status, Symptom Scale mean scores were more high in Group I, Functional Scale and H&N35 symptoms mean scores was high in Group III however no statistical significance was observed (p ​> ​0.05).

Conclusion

Head and neck cancer has severe effects on the quality of life. As observed from the findings of the current study, Global Health Status indicated a healthy level of living among patients who have undergone surgery alone; head and neck symptoms were more severe and problematic among patients who had surgery and radiotherapy. Therefore, assessing health related quality of life can be a factor that is weighed against treatment burden, toxicity, survival benefit. It can be more integral to treatment planning, refining treatment protocols and a better post-operative care and support.

Body mass index and self-care behaviors related to oral health-related quality of life in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma within three months posttreatment

PURPOSE

Oral dysfunction is a common adverse event of treatment and may affect oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). This study aimed to identify factors associated with OHRQoL in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) within the first three months posttreatment.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study examined OSCC patients who received treatment from the outpatient radiation department of a single cancer center in northern Taiwan. Demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded, and patients were assessed using the Self-Care Behaviors Scale (SCB), Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP), and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) questionnaires.

RESULTS

Among 148 OSCC patients, 11.5% reported being underweight and 70.3% reported normal weight. The most common self-care factors associated with adverse effects were decreased appetite and fatigue. Psychological disability, functional limitation, and physical pain were the most negative OHRQoL factors. Poor OHRQoL was associated with more severe adverse effects after self-care behaviors, using feeding tubes during treatment, and having BMI less than 25, which together explained 33.5% of the variance in OHRQoL.

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of adverse effects after self-care behaviors and using feeding tubes during treatment strongly influenced overall OHRQoL and seven specific dimensions of OHRQoL.